1 | Error Number | JPG Place Name | TDH Place Name: both INDEXES | County/Dept | TDH Place Name: Octavo table () given when spelling differs | TDH Place Name: (Folio table) () given when spelling differs | TDH Date OCTAVO INDEX | TDH Date FOLIO INDEX | TDH Date Octavo TABLE | TDH Date Folio TABLE | Comments (discrepancies of possible importance (Bold): (n=19) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 1 | Abingdon | Inter Newbury et Abingdon | Berkshire | (Abingdon) | (Abingdon) | 15/07/15 | 15/07/15 | Listed as Abingdon in both tables/duplicate entry | ||
3 | 2 | Ashley (2) | Ashley | Hampshire | Ashley | Ashley | 03/01/08 | 03/01/08 | 03/01/08 | Folio INDEX only MISSING DATA | |
4 | 3 | Bauge | Bauge | 18/09/06 | 18/09/06 | Missing from both indexes - see error 4 | |||||
5 | 4 | Bauge | Bauge | Anjou | 19/09/06 | 19/09/06 | Missing from both tables; differ by 1 day- see error 3 | ||||
6 | 5 | Bonneville sur Touque | Bonneville-sur-Touque | Normandie | (Bonneville) | 04/01/00 | 04/01/00 | 04/01/00 | Missing from Octavo table but found +1day- see see error 6 | ||
7 | 6 | Bonneville sur Touque | Bonneville-sur-Touque | Normandie | (Bonneville) | 05/01/00 | Found only in Octavo table- see see error 5 | ||||
8 | 7 | Bramber | Bramber | Sussex | Bramber | 25/05/15 | FOlIO TABLE & FOLIO INDEX MISSING DATA; year difference in Octavo - see error 8 | ||||
9 | 8 | Bramber | Bramber | Sussex | 25/05/16 | FOlIO TABLE & FOLIO INDEX MISSING DATA; year difference in Octavo - see error 7 | |||||
10 | 9 | Canterbury | Canterbury | Kent | Canterbury | Canterbury | 25/12/03 | 25/12/03 | 25/12/03 | FOlIO INDEX MISSING DATA | |
11 | 10 | Cardiff | Cardiff | Glamorganshire | Cardiff | 25/05/10 | 25/05/10 | FOlIO INDEX and TABLE MISSING DATA | |||
12 | 11 | Cherbourg | Cherbourg | Normandie | Cherbourg | Cherbourg | 04/12/03 | 04/12/03 | 04/12/03 | ?19thCentury clerical error in Octavo index because during Dec 1206 was in transit from Isle de Sain to England- see error 12 | |
13 | 12 | Cherbourg | Cherbourg | Normandie | Cherbourg | Cherbourg | 04/12/06 | see error 11 | |||
14 | 13 | Clarendon | Clarendon | Wiltshire | Clarendon | Clarendon | 25/04/12 | 25/04/12 | 25/04/12 | FOlIO INDEX MISSING DATA | |
15 | 14 | Clarendon | Clarendon | Wiltshire | Clarendon | Clarendon | 22/10/13 | 22/10/13 | 22/10/13 | FOlIO INDEX MISSING DATA | |
16 | 15 | Bishops Clere | Clere ( Bishop's) | Hampshire | (Bishop's Clere) | (Bishop's Clere) | 16/09/04 | 16/09/04 | missing from both indexes but different month - see error 18 | ||
17 | 16 | Bishops Clere | Clere | Clere | 16/12/04 | 16/12/04 | missing from both indexes - but see error 15 | ||||
18 | 17 | Bishops Clere | Clere ( Bishop's) | Hampshire | 18/12/04 | 18/12/04 | missing from both tables and would make error 16 more plausible | ||||
19 | 18 | Bishops Clere | Clere ( Bishop's) | Hampshire | (Bishop's Clere) | (Bishop's Clere) | 16/09/05 | 16/09/05 | missing from both tables but also see error 15 | ||
20 | 19 | Dorchester (1) | Doncaster | Yorkshire | 18/04/01 | 18/04/01 | These are recorded as DORCHESTER in both tables which is more likely geographically. | ||||
21 | 20 | Dorchester (1) | Doncaster | Yorkshire | 19/04/01 | 19/04/01 | These are recorded as DORCHESTER in both tables which is more likely geographically. | ||||
22 | 21 | Dorchester (1) | Dorchester | Dorchester | 18/04/01 | 18/04/01 | See errors 19 & 20 | ||||
23 | 22 | Dorchester (1) | Dorchester | Dorchester | 19/04/01 | 19/04/01 | See errors 19 & 20 | ||||
24 | 23 | n/a | Dunbar | Haddington | 19/01/16 | 19/01/16 | missing from both tables | ||||
25 | 24 | Farringdon (2) | Faringdon | Hampshire | Faringdon | 09/07/07 | 09/07/07 | 09/07/07 | mispelt? In Octavo table- see error 30 &31 | ||
26 | 25 | Farringdon (2) | Faringdon | Hampshire | 04/12/07 | 04/12/07 | mispelt? In Octavo and Folio tables- see error 30 &31 | ||||
27 | 26 | Farnham | Farnham | Surrey | Farnham | Farnham | 07/10/04 | 07/10/04 | missing from both indexes but see error 27 | ||
28 | 27 | Farnham | Farnham | Surrey | Farnham | Farnham | 09/10/04 | 09/10/04 | missing from both tables but see error 26 | ||
29 | 28 | Farnham | Farnham | Surrey | Farnham | Farnham | 07/11/04 | 07/11/04 | missing from both tables but see error29 | ||
30 | 29 | Farnham | Farnham | Surrey | Farnham | Farnham | 09/11/04 | 09/11/04 | missing from both indexes but see error 28 | ||
31 | 30 | Farringdon (2) | Farringdon | 09/07/07 | See error 24 & 25? misspelling | ||||||
32 | 31 | Farringdon (2) | Farringdon | Farringdon | 04/12/07 | 04/12/07 | See error 24 & 25 ? Misspelling | ||||
33 | 32 | Finmere | Finmere | Oxfordshire | Finmere | Finmere | 12/11/13 | 12/11/13 | 12/11/13 | MISSING DATA in FOlIO INDEX | |
34 | 33 | Freemantle | Freemantle | Hampshire | Freemantle | Freemantle | 19/10/13 | 19/10/13 | 19/10/13 | FOlIO INDEX MISSING DATA | |
35 | 34 | Gillingham (1) | Gillingham | Dorsetshire | Gillingham | Gillingham | 14/12/09 | 14/12/09 | 14/12/09 | FOlIO INDEX MISSING DATA | |
36 | 35 | Guildford | Guildford | Surrey | Guildford | Guildford | 07/10/04 | 07/10/04 | mssing from both indexes but differs by 1 day - see error35 | ||
37 | 36 | Guildford | Guildford | Surrey | Guildford | Guildford | 08/10/04 | 08/10/04 | mssing from both indexes-as above, see error 34 | ||
38 | 37 | Guildford | Guildford | Surrey | Guildford | Guildford | 07/11/04 | 07/11/04 | missing from both tables but differs by 1 year see error34 | ||
39 | 38 | Guildford | Guildford | Surrey | Guildford | Guildford | 08/11/04 | 08/11/04 | missing from both tables but differs by 1 year see error35 | ||
40 | 39 | Hanley | Hanley-Castle | Worcestershire | Hanley-Castle | Hanley-Castle | 22/11/13 | 22/11/13 | 22/11/13 | FOlIO INDEX MISSING DATA | |
41 | 40 | Hanley | Hanley-Castle | Worcestershire | Hanley-Castle | Hanley-Castle | 25/11/13 | 25/11/13 | 25/11/13 | FOlIO INDEX MISSING DATA | |
42 | 41 | Hereford | Hereford | Herefordshire | Hereford | Hereford | 14/11/12 | 14/11/12 | missing from both indexes | ||
43 | 42 | Hereford | Hereford | Herefordshire | Hereford | Hereford | 26/12/14 | only found in Folio index | |||
44 | 43 | Hereford | Hereford | Herefordshire | Hereford | Hereford | 27/12/14 | only found in Folio index | |||
45 | 44 | Lambeth | Lambeth | Surrey | Lambeth | Lambeth | 16/04/11 | 16/04/11 | missing from both indexes | ||
46 | 45 | Lexington | Lexington or Laxton | Nottinghamshire | Lexington | Lexington | 08/04/09 | 08/04/09 | 08/04/09 | 08/04/09 | Laxton 8 Apr 1209 : not in date order in both indices |
47 | 46 | Lire | Lire | Normandie | Lire | Lire | 07/01/00 | 07/01/00 | 07/01/00 | missing in Octavo table but 1 days differs- see error 47 | |
48 | 47 | Lire | Lire | Normandie | Lire | Lire | 08/01/00 | only found in Octavo table- see error 46 | |||
49 | 48 | Lisieux | Lisieux | Normandie | Lisieux | Lisieux | 06/01/00 | 06/01/00 | 06/01/00 | missing in Octavo table see error 49 | |
50 | 49 | Lisieux | Lisieux | Normandie | Lisieux | Lisieux | 07/01/00 | only found in Octavo table= see error 48 | |||
51 | 50 | London | London | Middlesex | [London] | [London] | 04/03/12 | 04/03/12 | see error 51 | ||
52 | 51 | Saint Brides London | Saint Brides, London | [St Brides. London] | [St Brides. London] | 04/03/12 | 04/03/12 | 04/03/12 | 04/03/12 | There is a full stop between St Bride's and London in both tables suggesting two locations and see above | |
53 | 52 | Marlborough | Marlborough | Wiltshire | 17/09/04 | 17/09/04 | missing from both tables but 1y differs see error 53 | ||||
54 | 53 | Marlborough | Marlborough | Wiltshire | Marlborough | Marlborough | 17/09/05 | 17/09/05 | missing from both indexes bit 1y differs see error 52 | ||
55 | 54 | Newark upon Trent | Newark-upon-Trent | Nottinghamshire | 27/12/15 | 27/12/15 | Missing from Octavo & Folio tables | ||||
56 | 55 | Newark upon Trent | Newark-upon-Trent | Nottinghamshire | Newark-upon-Trent | Newark-upon-Trent | 30/12/15 | 30/12/15 | Missing from Octavo & Folio indexes | ||
57 | 56 | Nottingham | Nottingham | Nottinghamshire | 20/03/15 | 20/03/15 | Both tables and indexes place KJ at Northampton ?duplicate entry | ||||
58 | 57 | Rouen | Rouen | Normandie | Rouen | Rouen | 23/07/03 | 23/07/03 | missing from both indexes but 1 day differ see error 58 | ||
59 | 58 | Rouen | Rouen | Normandie | 24/07/03 | 24/07/03 | missing from both tables but 1 day differ see error 57 | ||||
60 | 59 | Rouen | Rouen | Hampshire | 06/12/03 | 06/12/03 | missing from both tables but 1 day differ see error 60 | ||||
61 | 60 | Rouen | Southwick | Southwick | 07/12/03 | 07/12/03 | missing from both indexes but 1 day differ see error 59 | ||||
62 | 61 | Sutton at Hone | Sutton (at Hone) | Kent | 07/12/05 | 07/12/05 | missing from both tables but 1 day differ see error 62 | ||||
63 | 62 | Sutton at Hone | Sutton (at Hone) | Kent | Sutton | Sutton | 08/12/05 | 08/12/05 | missing from both indexes but 1 day differ see error 61 | ||
64 | 63 | Vouvant | Vouvant | Poitou | Vouvant | 18/05/14 | 18/05/14 | 18/05/14 | missing in Folio table | ||
65 | 64 | Waltham | Waltham | Essex | Waltham | Waltham | 31/05/05 | 31/05/05 | missing from both indexes but see Bishop's Waltham ? See error 65 | ||
66 | 65 | Bishops Waltham | Waltham ( Bishop's) | Hampshire | 31/05/05 | 31/05/05 | missing from both tables see error 64 | ||||
67 | 66 | Westminster | Westminster | Middlesex | 19/12/12 | 19/12/12 | missing from both tables but also recorded for Winchester ? Duplicate entry | ||||
68 | Totals ( Missing Data per source) | 27 | 36 | 28 | 31 | ||||||
69 | |||||||||||
70 | Printing Errors | ||||||||||
71 | Aylesbury | Aylesbury | Buckinghamshire | Aylesbury | Aylesbury | 26/11/05 | 26/11/05 | 26/11/05 | 26/11/05 | Octavo Index typo: Year 1405 instead of 1205 | |
72 | Aylesbury | Aylesbury | Buckinghamshire | Aylesbury | Aylesbury | 27/11/05 | 27/11/05 | 27/11/05 | 27/11/05 | Octavo Index typo: Year 1405 instead of 1205 | |
73 | Lewes | Lewes | Sussex | Lewes | Lewes | 24 to 28/2/05 | should be listed under next index entry, Lexington Nottinghamshire. Editing pencil mark on orginal copy |