1 | What is your affiliation with Lawrenceville? (Select All that Apply) | What do you like about the proposed Mobility Enhancement District? (MED) | What are your concerns about the proposed MED? | What challenges to mobility do you currently face in Lawrenceville? | Safety Improvements for Pedestrians & Cyclists | Accessibility Improvements | Traffic Calming | Bus Shelters | Bike Infrastructure | Shuttle from Satellite Lot to the Business District | Please feel free to use this space to share any other priorities you have for uses of these funds. | Do you support the proposed Mobility Enhancement District? | Do you support expanding Residential Permit Parking to residential blocks of LOWER LAWRENCEVILLE? | If you answered yes, do you support nighttime hours of enforcement for Residential Permit Parking (e.g. noon to midnight, instead of 7 AM to 7 PM) in LOWER LAWRENCEVILLE? | City code also permits "hybrid zones" in Residential Permit Parking areas where residents would be able to acquire RPP and visitor permits and park in the zone, but there would additionally be parking meters for other users. This would potentially improve | Please share any specific feedback on these questions for LOWER LAWRENCEVILLE. | Do you support expanding Residential Permit Parking to residential blocks of CENTRAL LAWRENCEVILLE (BELOW Butler Street)? | If you answered yes, do you support nighttime hours of enforcement for Residential Permit Parking (e.g. noon to midnight, instead of 7 AM to 7 PM) in CENTRAL LAWRENCEVILLE (BELOW Butler Street)? | City code also permits "hybrid zones" in Residential Permit Parking areas where residents would be able to acquire RPP and visitor permits and park in the zone, but there would additionally be parking meters for other users. This would potentially improve | Please share any specific feedback on these questions for CENTRAL LAWRENCEVILLE (BELOW Butler Street). | In general, how is the current Residential Permit Parking in CENTRAL LAWRENCEVILLE (ABOVE Butler Street) working for you? Are you overall happy with it? | Do you support nighttime hours of enforcement for Residential Permit Parking (e.g. noon to midnight, instead of 7 AM to 7 PM) in CENTRAL LAWRENCEVILLE (ABOVE Butler Street)? | City code also permits "hybrid zones" in Residential Permit Parking areas where residents would be able to acquire RPP and visitor permits and park in the zone, but there would additionally be parking meters for other users. This would potentially improve | Please share any specific feedback on these questions for CENTRAL LAWRENCEVILLE (ABOVE Butler Street). | Do you support expanding Residential Permit Parking to residential blocks of UPPER LAWRENCEVILLE? | Do you support nighttime hours of enforcement for Residential Permit Parking (e.g. noon to midnight, instead of 7 AM to 7 PM) in UPPER LAWRENCEVILLE? | City code also permits "hybrid zones" in Residential Permit Parking areas where residents would be able to acquire RPP and visitor permits and park in the zone, but there would additionally be parking meters for other users. This would potentially improve | Please share any specific feedback on these questions for UPPER LAWRENCEVILLE. | What questions do you still have about potential Residential Permit Parking changes? | Any other feedback for Lawrenceville United and Lawrenceville Corporation? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | Renter | The focus on safety for pedestrian crossing | not addressing how cars fly down side streets and Stanton ave | broken sidewalks, cars blocking street crossings, limited crosswalk options in lower Lawrenceville, cars speeding | 10 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 5 | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | No | No | No | I need a map of what blocks permits would be required. I do not support having to pay to street park at my own home. How much funds would be need to be used to run this program? | Please provide a map of where you want to add RPP | It feels like you are being transparent about MED (which is great!) but the RPP seems to be very vague which is concerning. | |||||
3 | Homeowner | Nothing? Honestly. I listened in to the meeting and read all the documents, and nothing good is in it. "putting money into a pot just for Lawrenceville" is just an illusion that means less money from the general city fund, so it's a net neutral. | It's a tax raise that just goes into a black box and end up in a general fund. This will increase city reliance on automobiles, which long-term will harm moving on from cars. The RPP program is terrible (I've lived in one before), and even worse now than | Beyond county-level bus schedule woes, nothing. The openness of the neighborhood is part of what makes it an awesome place to live! Stop being "xenophobic". Visitors are GOOD for us. | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 8 | The law has a "pilot" phase that is entirely undefined. For something that is supposedly good for the community (it's not), you should be able to state clear, measurable objectives (that aren't just revenue). Why not do something instead city-wide to targ | No | No | Yes | No | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Poorly. It's super challenging to get permits as a homeowner who is not a driver, but has a spouse who is a driver but is not attached to the deed utilities. | No | I don't have an opinion | No | No | No | This would absolutely stifle Upper Lawrenceville's development. | Why can we not have guests anonymously without submitting information to an online database? | |||||
4 | Homeowner | I like extending the hours until late and seeing more walking, biking, and bus improvements in Lawrenceville. | I think the MED needs to be paired with RPP for residents. | The intersections at 47th & Butler and 40th & Butler feel unsafe when I am walking. | 10 | 7 | 10 | 7 | 10 | 1 | Yes | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Yes | Yes | I live in Central Lawrenceville. My answer for hybrid is actually "I don't know." I am intrigued by the idea, but want more information on how it compares to RPP parking from a resident perspective. If RPP is done, I would want it to be 1 hour parking ins | N/A | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | What are the pros and cons of hybrid parking? | |||||
5 | Renter | Extending meter hours to create a fund Hybrid zones Nighttime meter enforcement Bike infrastructure | I want to be able to walk and bike more places safely. Parking is a concern as well. Coming home from work late/working weekends makes it hard for me to find parking even with an RPP. I would like to see more businesses have outdoor seating and more green | 10 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 10 | 7 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No, I find it hard to find parking in evenings and weekends when I am returning from work. I drive around the block a few times. | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||||||||
6 | Renter | Improve public infra, no subsidized parking at residents’ cost | Not ambitious enough, but a good start | Carbrains endangering everyone. Cross lights don’t stay long enough for pedestrians | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 5 | Aggressive ticketing and fines for any illegal parking (fire hydrant, disabled, on sidewalk etc). Perform a holistic study with residents to identify other pet peeves and low hanging fruit | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | It’s incredibly difficult to find parking due to non residents taking up all the free parking spots. Parking cannot be free. We can even increase the cost of the residential parking permit in order to support the neighborhood invest into needed improvem | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||||||
7 | Homeowner | That it would include RPP for residential parking (dire need on Thursday and Friday nights and weekends) | Reduced business traffic perhaps? | Not many, just parking as we live right by the Foundry and soon to be other apartment building and know for a fact 50-100 cars are from there (or will be with the new building) | 10 | 10 | 10 | 6 | 10 | 1 | Foster and Plummer Streets are really dangerous for pedestrians. Would love to see a separate bike lane or river trail extend to downtown | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Yes | Yes | Hybrid limited though perhaps to just the first block below Butler St? | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | ||||||
8 | Homeowner | Parking enforcement. Money spent on non-car related mobility projects (sidewalks, bike lanes, bus priority, etc) | None | Sidewalks consistently blocked by vehicles making it hard to navigate baby stroller. Lack of bike lanes connecting infra in the strip and east end. Non existent parking enforcement—especially on cars parked too close to curb causing intersection blind s | 10 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 8 | 1 | Anything to fix issues I outlined above | Yes | No | I don't have an opinion | Living in the 6th ward between Penn and liberty, we don’t have much issue with non resident parking, likely because of the lack of businesses around our home and distance from butler street. | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Don’t have an opinion as this is not my home area | Not affected | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Don’t have an opinion as this is not my home area | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Don’t have an opinion as this is not my home area | |||
9 | Renter;Business Owner | Nothing | Lawrenceville has become one of the top destinations in the city for both local and out of town visitors. This is entirely because of the small businesses - restaurants and bars, retail shops, salons, entertainment venues - which have made Lawrenceville | None | 10 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 1 | No | No | No | No | The proposal limits metered parking in RPP/Hybrid zones to ONE HOUR - this is absurdly short and will only result in folks not coming here. It also doesnt allow ANY EMPLOYEES of local businesses to park while they work. It is so inconsiderate of the peopl | No | No | No | n/a | No | No | Again, no option for employees who park here and are essential in keeping the neighborhood running. | No | No | No | same | What research and consideration has been made regarding the impact these proposed changes will have on local businesses, foot-traffic, and general accessibility of those coming here to shop, dine, etc? Why have these issues not been addressed in the prop | |||
10 | Homeowner;Business Owner | I think funds generated by parking infractions in Lawrenceville would stay in Lawrenceville. No general â pot. Otherwise leave things be. | Stated above, a general pot does not guarantee any funds will make it back to Lawrence. Keeping infraction ticket funds where they are generated would guarantee monies for mobility improvements. | Proper safe crosswalks at 53rd and properly signaled and sign crosswalks most of the way down Butler street. | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | If the pot is not general, but keep kept in Lawrenceville and not scattered around the whole city. | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | Upper Lawrenceville doesn’t have the madness that central and lower has. | |||||||||
11 | Homeowner | Who is enforcing this? | I don't think it will generate additional revenue and will cause a loss in local business | Parking availability | 5 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 10 | Fix the bad sideways before doing any other types of improvement | Not sure / need more information | Yes | Yes | Yes | Enforcement times should be from 1PM to 10PM (latest). Let people park for lunch then move and if you aren't home by 10PM then you shouldn't be guaranteed a spot | Yes | Yes | Yes | RPP should only be enforced 1-10 | RPP doesn't need to be enforced before noon or 1 PM | Yes | No | RPP should be $100/ year for 1st vehicle and $1000/ year for any additional vehicles registered to a property | No | No | No | Several streets in upper Lawrenceville should be made to be 1 way streets or parking only on 1 side. Then permits maybe necessary | Why are permits so cheap? This disincentivizes residence from using parking on their property and having multiple vehicles | Stronger enforcement of No parking near intersections, stop signs and other areas so that emergency vehicles are not impeded |
12 | Homeowner | 1. Would be nice if it were easier for non-lville residents to get into lville without needing to drive + find parking. Bike infrastructure and bus infrastructure would be great. 2. People drive way too fast on residential / pedestrian streets in lville. | The current parking permit system makes no sense. 1. I never have trouble parking within a block of my house, even on Friday and Saturday nights. And I live on one of the busiest streets. Just get ride of parking permits all together. The problem with pa | Parking permits are a huge waste of everyone's time | 10 | 8 | 10 | 3 | 10 | 1 | Not sure / need more information | No | No | No | Expanding permit zones will make life worse for residents and adding meters will lead to fewer people visiting restaurants and stores. | No | No | No | Expanding permit zones will make life worse for residents and adding meters will lead to fewer people visiting restaurants and stores. | The current parking permit system makes no sense. 1. I never have trouble parking within a block of my house, even on Friday and Saturday nights. And I live on one of the busiest streets. Just get ride of parking permits all together. The problem with pa | No | No | Expanding permit zones will make life worse for residents and adding meters will lead to fewer people visiting restaurants and stores. | No | No | No | Expanding permit zones will make life worse for residents and adding meters will lead to fewer people visiting restaurants and stores. | |||
13 | Renter | It doesn't address wheelchair accessibility at all. I want to be sure it doesn't add the weird protrusions into the street and deep wells with plantings on corners that have been put in places like Oakland, Squirrel Hill, and Ellsworth St. These pose haz | Wheelchair access to a lot of businesses. This is really shocking in 2022, more than 30 years after passage of the ADA, and especially in businesses that have done extensive renovations - like the candle business on Butler St. The city building departmen | 10 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 2 | Not sure / need more information | Yes | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | N/A | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | ||||||||
14 | Lawrenceville Business Employee | I like that the quality of the pedestrian experience will be improved and that residents are the major beneficiaries of change | The MED appears to be focused on increasing revenues through expanded metering and fee based permits. These actions will not expand the amount of parking available. They will either push visitors to go elsewhere where parking is free or create hardships f | Curb cuts have significantly reduced the available parking in favor of single-family garage access. The condition of infrastructure has also reduced parking availability due to potholes, collapsing drains, placement of equipment blocking access, etc. Doub | 6 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | More consideration for business employees who commute would be appreciated since this area is not connected to bus lines utilized by commuters to the downtown area. Optimization and Improvements to the existing parking areas to accommodate more vehicles. | Not sure / need more information | No | No | No | No | I am less concerned with parking enforcement than I am with availability, access, opportunity and working with the various cycles of parking by residents, workers, visitors, deliveries, etc. | I don't have an opinion | Yes | No | No | No | ||||||||
15 | Renter | More study needed to determine if parking meter collection should be extended to evening hours with caution that if done it may push even more evening parking into residential areas, especially on weekends. | Believe issue is that there is not enough available parking in neighborhood to support weekend traffic, are residential developers required to provide adequate on-site parking? | Only occasionally on weekend evenings and I walk to Butler St. On weekends, it works okay for now. | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | We cannot lose more parking to traffic calming, it hurts retail. There does not seem to be enough bus ridership to justify bus shelters which will crowd already narrow sidewalks and require cleaning and maintenance, they are not necessary in this laegely | Not sure / need more information | It works well except when Thunderbird has very popular weekend night time programming. | I don't have an opinion | No | Main Street works well right now in area where I live. | Good process, keep it going! | ||||||||||||||
16 | Renter | Pedestrian and bike safety. Cars parked illegally limit visibility and create unsafe conditions. Cars clutter streets and should be more limited on narrow streets that can't accommodate 2 way traffic | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 6 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | |||||||||
17 | Business Owner | Metered parking expansion to include all of butler st | The impact to residents and workers | There is no parking for business customers because cars remain parked on butler at all day | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 5 | General neighborhood improvements- most of the proposed uses of these funds are vague - I'd like to understand, specifically, what improvements these funds will be used for. | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | No | No | No | |||||||
18 | Homeowner;Business Owner;Landlord;Lawrenceville Business Employee | I am in full support of increased metering of Butler street, with longer hours, and higher costs, and using that revenue to support much-needed bike/ped improvements. Those meters could extend half a block perpendicular to Butler Street if necessary. | I am nervous about the increased perception of "lack of parking" in Lawrenceville from visitors and how that perception can negatively impact area businesses. | I would like to see increased protected bike lanes and trails for recreational bike and walking use. | 10 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 1 | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | How have employee parking needs been considered in this process? I would be more inclined to support RPP areas if employers/employees were able to purchase permits, similar to how residents can purchase permits. There are many businesses in Lawrenceville | With larger RPP districts, I am nervous about the increased perception of "lack of parking" in Lawrenceville from visitors and how that perception can negatively impact area businesses. | |||||||||
19 | Homeowner | Fully supportive! Parking rates are so low, do not think will disincentive | Don't want businesses to suffer | Car centric - need ped & bike improvements for safety | 10 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 3 | Sidewalk & curb cuts/step removal first. Let lanes & shuttles follow | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Live in Bloomfield side of border & already use RPP - makes sense to expand neighborhood wide | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Upper does feel different than other side neighborhood - will defer to those residents & business owners | |||||
20 | Business Owner | Nothing, it is going to hurt our small businesses. We are the heart of upper Lawrenceville and we are extremely different from lower and central. We have all put in so much work to keep our businesses afloat and to turn this area into such a beautiful spo | We do not have enough foot traffic as it is in upper lawrenceville, the parking meters will bring less and less people to our area and our businesses will lose business and eventually not be able to survive at all and in turn everyones homes in the area w | None at all, i have no issue parking and i come to Lawrenceville every single day. | No | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Please consider how much the parking meters and stricter parking rules will affect Upper Lawrenceville. We really need this area to be as accessible as possible when we do not have even a fraction of the foot traffic that there is in the rest of the neigh | |||||||||||||
21 | Renter | I like that it will encourage PRT bus use and give more parking to residents | I am concerned it will be detrimental to small business, and the bus schedules aren't strong enough yet to enable people who don't live in Lawrenceville to still want to come shop/hang out here. | Drivers often make turns off of Butler into the crosswalks before checking for pedestrians. I have been almost hit by cars driving too fast through intersections or turning right on red. This is worse for pedestrians in wheelchairs or with low vision/blin | 1 | 10 | 10 | 2 | 10 | 1 | Traffic cameras may help reduce driver speed and ignorance of traffic lights. The speed limit is sufficient but drivers do not abide by it, especially in lower Lawrenceville and around 40th street bridge. | Not sure / need more information | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | This could be detrimental to Children's employees | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | ||||||
22 | Homeowner;Business Owner | Encourages non-vehicular travel to Lawrenceville. It doesn't make sense that driving to the bars is cheaper than taking a bus. We should incentive people to not drink and drive. The drivers are loud late at night when going back to their cars â and this s | Employees of businesses should have a reliable method to park. We should have reasonable limits: perhaps, parking is no more than 20% more expensive than the bus fare, and no more than a ten minute walk from their place of employment. We can play with t | Sidewalks are broken. Drivers park on them and block them. Not enough bike lanes. Waiting for the 91 in the snow sucks. | 10 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 3 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | It's common to have multiple evening guests. If we live in a non-hybrid zone, we should still have a way of paying for additional guest passes. Physical passes would be great too. My elderly neighbors won't be happy using an app or website to get five p | |||||||
23 | Homeowner | In terms of paid for parking that doesn't impact me as much since I have a residential permit. | I think it could deter people from visiting especially depending on the limit for parking. For example I know some places have 2 hour limits which if you are here for longer makes things tricky. There are also just not that many spots available. | The fact that I can only register 1 visitor pass for friends or family make things very difficult. A lot of my visitors are concerned with parking far away and want to be close to the house. But that means only 2-3 visitors at the time when normally we ha | 9 | 3 | 10 | 2 | 6 | 7 | Our streets are very tight, but I also love parking close to my home. I'm not sure how to handle these two opposing ideas but parking is definitely a huge issue in my mind. As I walk along the street closer to the river there is so many open areas or old | If you mean supporting specifically the increased parking meter hours, I don't support that. I would rather there be expanded area of meters but make it cheaper. So basically, increase the volume but decrease amount per car | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | No | Yes | Currently if we have more than one car visiting us they have to park on the other side of Butler. If this was also turned into rpp parking then that would make it very hard for us to have visitors so we would need the option for more visitor passes. | Overall happy, however we need the option for more visitor passes. The only issue we have is if we want to go to trace brewery and the zone changes then we don’t feel that we can drive because the permit goes until 7. This is where a hybrid zone where w | No | Yes | In the hybrid approach are you saying that the parking meters would be required at all time? That seems a bit rough if people just want to come visit for a few hours. If some funds went into updating the app for parking that might alleviate that issue. | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Would like more information on hybrid zone: what would the price per hour be? What would be the hours of “operation?†Will there be changes to visitor passes? Do you have to find a specific “zone†for the meter or would it apply to all of Lawrence | I don’t like the 12-12 parking situation because then any friends who come for an hour or so after work go through more trouble to have to visit. | ||
24 | Homeowner | More parking for residents | Less parking for business visitors | Finding parking at church, biking safetly | 10 | 8 | 10 | 6 | 10 | 1 | Yes | Too many illegal parkers and poor enforcement | Yes | No | Effective enforcement at residential is key, I would support hybrid if it had limits on paid parkers to protect residents | |||||||||||||||
25 | Homeowner;Business Owner | As both a homeowner and business owner in Lawrenceville, there is nothing in this current plan that appeals to me. | You are making it more difficult and costly for those coming from outside of the neighborhood, which is numerous, to visit and frequent the shops, restaurants, and other establishments. The dynamic pricing that is proposed will even further curtail people | Two things: 1. Potholes. 2. Intersection of 40th St Bridge and Foster is dangerous. This intersection desperately needs a light. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | No | No | No | No | No | No | I don't have an opinion | No | No | No | No | Are there limits to visitor passes? | Go out and solicit feedback directly from businesses. I can tell you many do not know about this and are unaware of these proposed changes. We have to consider both residents AND businesses needs. You won't have a bustling neighborhood without both. | |||||||
26 | Homeowner | I oppose the installation of parking meters on 39th St between Penn Ave and Butler St. Parking meters would create a significant inconvenience for family and friends that visit my house. Additionally, parking meters would discourage people from visiting | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | Thank you for your service to the neighborhood and for the great work that you do! | |||||||||
27 | Homeowner | I like the metered parking and collecting revenue for the community. | In all planned RPP proposals, none of the zones go back far enough to address the parking issues Harrison Street faces due to several commercial property staff and patrons. I'd like to see Harrison Street included in the RPP. | It is very dangerous walking in Lawrenceville, especially at the intersection of Butler and. Plumber street. I'd like to see better crosswalks and more enforcement of traffic laws to protect pedestrians. | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 1 | If funds can be used to help residents that are not able to afford the residential parking fee, I'd like to see if used for that as well. | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | None | Yes | Yes | Yes | Please ensure the zone extends to Harrison Street. There are several residents on that street and if we are not included, people will just find parking here and it will be even more difficult for residents who live on Plum Way and Harrison to find street | I do not park in that area. | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Will business owners be able to get permits for their staff? | There are major parking issues from Trash Kings and RE2 staff. Trash Kings staff parks on 50 street everyday (including weekends) in an area where residents on Plum Ave typically park. | ||
28 | Homeowner | Increased turnover at metered spaces and revenue for mobility improvements | May cause spillover parking if not well designed | There are a number of intersections that are dangerous to walk across (Plummer St and Butler, 40th and Butler) | 10 | 7 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 4 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Options B and C do not extend the RPP to Harrison St. Harrison street has a number of residential properties and if there is RPP on the streets towards Butler then people will park on Harrison or the nearby blocks and walk the few blocks to Butler. This i | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||||||
29 | Homeowner | I do not like it nor am I in favor of it. | This is a bad idea because people will then look for parking in front of our homes and we residents will not have our spots available. | Too many vehicles already but bikes and spin scooters make walking more hazardous since they run stop signs, traffic lights, drive on sidewalks (almost hit a few people including me) and spin scooters go up one-way streets then are left in the middle of s | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 8 | For years we asked for help to keep up Arsenal Park , restore the pond , restore the restrooms,pave the walkways,fix pot holes or restore the former pool area at Leslie park but there was never any money. You could fund our Fisk library too. | No | I don't have an opinion | No | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | It is not enforced enough as people visiting still take our spots so it's a waste of money. | Yes | No | Having residential parking permit area in addition to hybrid will create more of a cluster in addition to limiting parking spaces for residents. Why not have a designated parking lot that will allow visitors to leave their vehicles and then be shuttled t | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | In my opinion the spin scooters are a hazard. | ||||||
30 | Lawrenceville Business Employee | I like that this plan allows for a place for people in Lawrenceville to have guaranteed parking near their homes. | I dislike there not being an option for employee parking. A lot of the businesses that are along Lawrenceville have employees that work in those establishments, it seems like the plan doesn't take into account the people who help these businesses thrive. | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 1 | Not sure / need more information | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Why would there be a complete removal of a grace period for the people that don't have residential permits? | No | Yes | Why would there be a complete removal of a grace period for the people that don't have residential permits? | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | What would this parking enforcement mean for people that work in the area? During the day and in the service industry in the evenings? | |||||||
31 | Homeowner;Business Owner | Seems like a good way to generate revenue that hopefully goes back into the neighborhood | Pushing more people to park off of Butler where parking is already at a premium for residents | Personally none, but a lot of cars park on the sidewalks due to lack of options and narrow streets creating unsafe passage for pedestrians and disallowing wheelchairs | 10 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 1 | Safer crosswalks would be great as well as creating more lots for parking | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | We need parking lots for visitors. There isn't nearly enough street parking for them and all of the residents who typically are a more than one vehicle household. There's a prime brown lot at 36th and Smallman St that would be a convenient place for such. | I don't have an opinion | None | I hope that part of this included traffic safety and usage studies. So many of these side streets below Butler St like Charlotte, 38th, 37th are too narrow for 2 way traffic, emergency vehicles and large trucks. Fire trucks often can't turn down 38th, sem | |||||||||||
32 | Homeowner;Business Owner | I like that the revenues stay local and can continue to support mobility needs in the neighborhood. Continuing to meter in high use hours feels appropriate. | Adding metered hours outside of parking enforcement times may just lead to abuse of the situation. It may also lead to more parking on nearby residential streets. Parking permits throughout the neighborhood are abused and enforcement doesn't feel consiste | Biking within the neighborhood is really challenging for me. Parking on sidewalks is commonplace, impeding other uses and causing damage over time. In general the neighborhood is extremely congested with cars. | 10 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 10 | 10 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Generally it works well for our own needs, but we do observe many people using permits in the district who are clearly not residents but are working at Children's Hospital. The same is true for people renting out their (usually illegal) parking pads on th | Yes | No | The reason I don't support adding parking meters to this area is that it is likely to encourage more Children's Hospital employees and/or visitors to park within the residential areas at meters vs. paying to park in the lot or along Penn Avenue which is a | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||||||
33 | Homeowner | I like that non residents will be discouraged from driving into Lawrenceville. When they do decide to drive here, they will help us make it more accessible. | It doesnt go far enough to discourage non residents from driving in. | The sidewalks on the backstreets are in dire need of repairs. Biking on Butler St can be more dangerous than I'd like. Bus stops need to have more covered benches. | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 1 | I would love to see Green Blvd recieve some funding. Basically anything that offers an alternative to driving. | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | I think hybrid or RPP for central would make sense. | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||||||
34 | Homeowner;Landlord | I like having a pool of funds to help our neighborhood. | We need another metered lot to handle car volume. I don't like resident street permit parking | CROSSWALKS at Butler and Main and the terrible timing of the turn arrow at 40th and Butler. These are two incredibly dangerous intersections. Also, people parking right up to the intersection blocking sidewalks and safe views should be ticketed and towed | 10 | 3 | 9 | 6 | 10 | 5 | Visible crosswalks, protected bike lanes, outdoor dining | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | No | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Not applicable | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Yes | What about guests? Residents need the ability to allow family and friends to park while Visiting | |||||
35 | Renter | Attention to the ongoing parking issue. Support for residential parking areas and metered zones on business streets. | Creating less spaces for residents | Available parking for residents - Every weekend spots are taken by business visitors. Current streets are too small to handle the amount of traffic (ie. Foster). Lack of bus shelters. Poor sidewalks. | 9 | 6 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 1 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Parking for residents is hard enough given the small roads and increasing amount of people moving here. Adding business traffic makes it nearly impossible to find parking options, especially on weekends. There is a need for proper spacing for residents on | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Though expensive, the most ideal situation is one that is similar to shady side and squirrel hill, where infrastructure exists specifically for business visitors. | ||||||
36 | Homeowner | Making sidewalks safer; encouraging parking turnover; increasing foot traffic | i don't have any | pedestrian safety | 10 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 6 | 1 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | My neighbors, who have lived in Lawrenceville forever (way longer that me, and I've been here for nearly 15 years) hate the idea because they don't want to get permissions for visitors and they don't want to pay. Just FYI. I'm in support of it but I also | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | |||||||
37 | Homeowner | Generation of much needed funds to address needed accessibility and mobility repairs and upgrades in Lawrenceville. I think night time metered on parking on Butler, particularly on the weekends, makes a lot of sense because those are some of the peak tim | My only potential concern is around how "dynamic" the dynamic pricing is. I think we want to make the fee structure as simple as possible (e.g., only having two prices like a "general rate" and a "peak rate") | Broken, uneven, and closed sidewalks; Lack of bus shelters | 8 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 7 | 7 | I think we should focus on transit improvements (such as bus shelters) as much as biking and pedestrian improvements. Low income folks and people with disabilities are more likely to need and use transit. | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | From my experience, Central Lawrenceville below Butler gets a lot of non-resident parking during evening hours, particularly on the weekends. I think getting parking revenue from these visitors would be great. Since I don't live in this part of Lawrencevi | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | No | No | I don't have an opinion | Based on my experience, I don't see a need for RPP in Upper Lawrenceville. I would be open to considering hybrid RPP for streets close to Butler, but once you get 3 or 4 blocks away from Butler, I think visitor/business traffic is essentially null. | Thanks for the thoughtful public process :) | ||||
38 | Homeowner | extension of meter parking collection and creation of fund for mobility enhancement | that it won't be enacted | uneven sidewalks - dangerous intersections | 10 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 6 | some kind of bumpouts on corner/intersections where cars park all the way to the corners and you can't see to be able to safely turn cornersd. | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | seems to be working well | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | enforcement needs to be beefed up or it won't succeed | ||||||
39 | Homeowner;Business Owner;Landlord | That it raises money to improve mobility in the neighborhood. | Without also increasing public transport and non-car options to access the neighborhood (bus lines, bike lanes, etc) it will deter people from visiting lawrenceville and spending money on shopping and dining out. | None. | 9 | 10 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 8 | A lot of these sound great! | Yes | No | No | No | I live and operate a business in lower lawrenceville. Currently, there is plenty of street parking available nearby and it is easy, uncomplicated, and hassle free for my household and business patrons. I like the simplicity and lack of needing to acquire | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | None. | N/A | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | None | No | I don't have an opinion | No | I used to reside in upper lawrenceville and still visit many businesses there regularly. I feel that the current parking situation works well and is easy, uncomplicated, and permit-free for residents and those visiting the area. | None. | Nope! Thanks for all the work you do. |
40 | Homeowner | Dynamic meter pricing. New Hybrid RPP areas below Butler Street. | The proposal does not address the influx of parking demands that are direct result of new residents from the apartment complexes. Since they have limited and expensive parking options for their residents, them and their guests are forced to park on the st | Parking near my house. In the morning I have to compete for spaces with the employees of Techmill 41, in the evening I compete with residents/guests of The Foundry who don't pay for parking at the apartments, and on the weekend I have to compete for space | 8 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 8 | Speed bumps on on busy side streets like Willow, Foster, Eden Way, Hatfield Street, and 44th street where street racers and speeders billow down to get to Butler and 40th. | Not sure / need more information | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | As the Foundry at 41st Street continues to have events in the bay and the Techmill limits employee parking on premises, the option for metered parking on Willow Street for employees/event goers would produce even more revenue. | |||||||||||
41 | Homeowner | Focus on safety/accessibility and beautification of our neighborhood | Resources and sustainability/maintenance | Stroller accessibility/trip hazards | 10 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 10 | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | If there could be an expanded public parking lot for nightlife in Lawrenceville, that would be amazing so many times we are left scrambling if we have to leave for an emergency or an outing and come home to no parking on the weekend. | moderately dissatisfied | Yes | Yes | It would be amazing if homeowners own the spots in front of their home in order to have a dedicated parking spot. | Yes | Yes | Yes | How are fees used? Will they be reinvested into our neighborhood? | ||||
42 | Homeowner;I also work in the neighborhood, on Butler | Extended enforcement of *EXISTING* meters. | It doesn't seem that meters from Plummer to Stanton (where I work) are necessary at the moment--there's plenty of parking available. This part of the neighborhood is finally getting attention/business, so I don't think metering all of Butler will be benef | Being a pedestrian in the neighborhood is dangerous. I was working near 49th and Butler when someone was struck by a vehicle in that crosswalk. I don't know if you've ever heard someone get hit by a car, but it hasn't been something I can un-hear. Certain | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 1 | While I think we need parking lots, having a shuttle that drives people to the "business district" is ridiculous. Enforcing businesses leave enough room on their sidewalks for those in wheelchairs to get around. | Not sure / need more information | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | No | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | If expanding RPP goes into effect, the permit zone for all of Lville should be the same (all A). Sometimes residents who live above Butler can't find parking and have to park below. The neighborhood is only getting denser and condos with garages are remov | ||||||
43 | Renter | 5 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 1 | No | No | No | No | ||||||||||||||||||||
44 | Renter | Additional funds for Lawrenceville development (street cleaning, sidewalks, infrastructure improvements) | Parking on side streets is already tight on weekends. Aren't people just going to not park on butler and go to the side streets because Lawrenceville is so walkable? I'm sure a study would be done to set pricing appropriately though. | Uneven sidewalks. Dangerous intersections at butler and 44th and foster and 44th. Trash stays around for quite a while on sidewalks | 10 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 1 | Yes | No | No | No | No | Residential permitting discourages people to come to the neighborhoodsâ Lawrenceville is walkable and has access to public transit. Better bike infrastructure would be nice. Improving these things would mean even less cars! | I actually understand this one | No | No | No | No | No | Why aren't garages that don't allow street parking in FRONT of houses banned (if the back of a house is an alleyâ so be it)? It encourages car ownership, unnecessarily increases housing prices and makes parking all that more difficult. Useless | |||||||
45 | Homeowner | Funds created for infrastructure | Loss of street parking as a Penn Ave resident | Sidewalks in disrepair. Would love to see more trees | 10 | 10 | 5 | 8 | 10 | 1 | Trees/greenspace | Yes with allowance for RPP for residents | Yes | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | |||||||
46 | Homeowner | Sounds great | Free parking is bad and we should have less of it: therefore the MED is a good step forward. If people want to park on public land they should pay for it! | Not enough bodegas / a neighborhood grocery store. Also a bike/ped underpass under the 40th St Bridge would be great. | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 1 | Whatever makes walking/transit a viable option for everyday trips. | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Less free parking! | Yes | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Less free parking! | Too much goddamn free parking | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Less free parking! | Yes | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Less free parking! | Can we also reduce off street parking mandates for new construction? | We need Shoup teach-ins |
47 | Homeowner | Service worker parking | 1) pedestrian safety. 2) bike safety 3) Parking Thur - Sat night. | 10 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 10 | 9 | Traffic calming | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Nighttime dynamic pricing for non-residents | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Meter to match demand at night. Make driving to bar more expensive than bus / other. Invest in train service on existing tracks. Offer a shuttle from elsewhere - less parking in Lawrenceville neighborhood | ||||||
48 | Homeowner;Lawrenceville Business Employee | Evening enforcement, parking costing more than busing (incentivizing bus through cost), targeting areas of congestion | Cost to residents, cost should go to the "Lawrenceville Goer." A destination cost. Serivce employees need somehwere to park. Parking should not fall to someone getting paid ~$15/hr + trying to afford living in the city. | Speeding, Blind turns onto Penn as you come up from Butler, no crossing guards on Butler by Arsenal Elementary + K-5 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 4 | I feel like these are all connected, so if you touch "traffic calming" you are doing that w/ accessibility, bike, and pedestrian safety in mind. | In phases, see how one change to metering effects side streets before deciding on next steps. | No | I don't have an opinion | Yes | I'm concerned about visitor parking. If we have a dinner party or have grandparents visit, it just adds another complication. | Yes | Yes | Yes | I feel like this is the hardest hit area | I want there to be a way to make local employees exempt. | |||||||||
49 | Homeowner | I like the idea of fixing the sidewalk infrastructure, but I'm not sure why our taxes aren't already being utilized for this | Upper Lawrenceville's parking along butler street is mostly people who live on butler street. I don't think that permit parking is going to solve anything and just make it more expensive to live here. For the people barely getting by it's just going to ma | None. | 5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 5 | Half walk signs at ALL intersections along butler street and change the timing for the walk signs to come one BEFORE the green lights for traffic, because for some reason pittsburghers don't give pedestrians the right of way. Other cities let the pedestri | Consider what the business owners are saying about this and who has a butler street address seriously. I honestly don't feel like this is going to generate the funds to make the impact that you are proposing it will | No | No | No | Whose going to enforce this? If the answer is, we don't know. Then this whole plan falls apart. | No | No | No | Same as above | N/a | No | No | Same as my answer to lower Lville | No | No | No | Upper Lawrenceville is in a growing stage and this will set it back. Please don't slow the progress of what we have going in upper by doing this | Whose going to enforce this? | RPP in other cities are always an added stressor on residents. I have family and friends in Philly, Seattle and NYC and they only have complaints about their permit parking situation. When we go to visit it's ALWAYS a concern and headache. |
50 | Homeowner;Landlord | Additional parking meters/permits | Additional meters creating even more parking issues on streets on the river side of Butler Street. | Parking is horrendous. On top of the retail visitors taking up street parking spots many of the larger new apartment complexes have renters taking up spots as well because they don't want to pay for the parking fees at the apartments. | 7 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 7 | I know there is always some pushback with residential permits but at this stage it's almost a necessity with the influx of new residents and new retail establishments. | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Having lived in Shadyside and Friendship I can say residential permits have a positive effect on the lack of parking. | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes, same as my previous comment. Permit would greatly help the parking shortage. | Yes, same as my previous comment. Permit would greatly help the parking shortage. | Yes | Yes | Yes, same as my previous comment. Permit would greatly help thd parking shortage. | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes, same as my previous comment. Permit would greatly help thd parking shortage. | ||
51 | Homeowner | Hyper local revenue and demand pricing | I genuinely think we need a garage and to remove street parking in favor of bike lanes and pedestrian space. Walnut in shadyside isn't great but the garage is a huge help for limiting parking on walnut itself. | Butler is sort of an industrial highway which can make biking during business house kinda stink and bumper to bumper during popular times. I think the strategy of searching for street parking makes this worse and leads to lots of on-curb parking, etc. A g | 10 | 8 | 10 | 7 | 10 | 2 | Yes | I don't understand the incentives enough. Do these lead to more car ownership because it's easier to park? That feels bad. Do these lead to more people taking transit to Lawrenceville because parking is hard? That feels maybe good? Ideal world means as f | ||||||||||||||||||
52 | Homeowner | Extending meters into evening for commercial district. Dynamic parking makes a lot of sense and additional revenues will support mobility initiatives. | People not understanding it | None really, although would always like to see continued improvements to sidewalk conditions and bike infrastructure. | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | All of the above are important priorities. Love idea of shuttle although it would need to be regular and frequent so users will know they can depend on it. | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Thank you for this initiative, and numerous oppportunities to get information | ||||||
53 | Homeowner | The neighborhood's rapid growth has outpaced the current mobility infrastructure, and the MED is a solid attempt to course correct. | Only concern is for residents that live on the edges of the expanded paid parking areas, where non residents will park; so enhanced enforcement to discourage illegal parking in resident areas would be important. | Would be nice to have safer pedestrian crossings of Butler St. above 40th street. | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 6 | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Works well as is. We do have people that are non-residents parking in Zone GG, and am not sure how they get permits. | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | I don't have an opinion | Yes | |||||||
54 | Renter | Sidewalks would be more accessible to pedestrians | Extending metered parking could deter visitors from shopping/dining in Lawrenceville OR push them to the side streets and take parking from residents which is already a problem during the weekend. A multilevel parking garage would make the area accessible | Parking in Central Lawrenceville | 9 | 10 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 2 | Build a tasteful parking garage similar to the one on Walnut St (Shadyside) | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | I said no to enforcement in Lower Lawrenceville because Central has businesses that are more frequented in the evening hours (after 7) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Central has businesses that attract evening visitors: bars, clubs, restaurants and parking is a nightmare for those visitors and residents. | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Most businesses in Upper Lawrenceville tend to close at 7 with the exception of a couple bars and restaurants. I'm not sure that permits need to be required above Butler in this area due to accessibility. I live on a hill and don't find that visitors woul | How many visitors would residents be allowed? | I truly believe parking garages would improve accessibility and be a solution to many of the parking challenges in the neighborhood. They can be done tastefully, similarly to the one on Walnut Street. There are vacant buildings close to The Abbey that cou | |
55 | Renter | I currently have no mobility or parking problems, and I'm concerned that the changes you are proposing will actually create problems for me. As a resident, I am not happy with the idea of losing my free parking there because of newly installed parking met | I currently have no mobility or parking problems, and I'm concerned that the changes you are proposing will actually create problems for me. | 10 | 10 | 1 | 10 | 5 | Not sure / need more information | Maybe I'm not understanding how the RPP works, but one of the things I love about where I live is that I never have issues parking and my parking is free. This means that my visitors can also park for free near me. One of the proposed changes is adding me | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | ||||||||||||
56 | Frequent Visitor | More landscaping | Meter parking at night... No more free parking. To me spending money on parking equals less money for me to spend at business. | None, all is well | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | Trash cleaning/more parking spaces/bring in more businesses | No | No | No | Leave parking as is. | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | ||||||
57 | Renter | Nothing. | I do not think this is necessary. This is not the Southside as we were compared to during the first meeting. There’s no need to extend enforcement hours if the hours currently in place were enforced. There is very little enforcement now, and if you walk | Missing crosswalks on Butler, signage for pedestrians in crosswalks (the sign that goes in the middle of the road that instructs drivers to stop for pedestrians). I also think we need to do something about all the cutting through the neighborhood to avoid | 10 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 8 | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | This program is not needed. | The presentation that was held with LU and some city departments was rather embarrassing. We're new to LU, but I was disappointed at how little preparation was done in advance. City officials (DOMI) could not answer the most basic of questions. Frankly, i | ||||||
58 | Homeowner | Parking at night is as much as a premium as daytime parking so it makes sense for people coming in from outside neighborhoods to have to pay. | Trying to safely cross 40th and Butler. It is ridiculously dangerous | 9 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 8 | Not sure how the shuttle would work but could be good idea. I would also consider designated space for ride share as frequently cars stop traffic for pickups/ drop offs. | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | We need a big public lot or garage | No | I don't support it because it will make parking on my street (right above Butler) that much more difficult. Very selfish, I know. | At night when Thunderbird, Belvedere etc open is when there is the toughest parking challenge. | Yes | Yes | I am unsure of parking kiosks on sidewalks as it is already difficult getting in and out of cars because of street trees (which I love, but do get in the way frequently). Thinking parking kiosks will be yet another obstacle. | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Why not use /get funding for a parking garage in the defunct Leslie Pool area? It seems like a perfect location (wouldn't annoy too many neighbors) and the land is just sitting there. All of this new development being planned without sufficient parking as | ||||||
59 | Homeowner;Business Owner;Landlord | Shuttle buses, more bike lanes & safety for cyclists & pedistrian. | If you increase the amount of time one must pay for parking meters doesn't that just create more of a problem for those of us who live in the neighborhood & have to park on the street?Those visiting who have driven into the neighborhood will try to park i | People visiting the area taking up local residential parking. | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Not sure / need more information | Yes | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | |||||||||||
60 | Homeowner | The extended time of meter collection in the business area. With most people Below the age of 50 using the parking authority app, it's very easy to pay the meter and the few extra dollars to park aren't going to stop most people from going out | Living in lower lawrenceville, we currently aren't RPP, and despite the occasional challenge of finding a parking spot within a few blocks of home, I would prefer if lower lawrenceville continues to be RPP free. RPP's discourage people from different area | Occasional parking, but a very minor issue. My wife and I have 3 vehicles so it's mostly our own fault. However, some better signage in some area could help. Along smallman between 33rd and 36th, it seems as if there is parking available on either side of | 7 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 5 | Not sure / need more information | No | No | I do not like parking permit areas because it discourages people from coming into the area | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | ||||||||
61 | Homeowner | I like that it generates revenue for infrastructure improvements aimed at safety for cyclists and pedestrians, while keeping cars in mind. Steps need to be taken to make the neighborhood walkability and accessibility better. There is plenty of car traffic | I don't know if this is the works, but there needs to be more attention placed on bike lane protection. Aside from that, I'm not too concerned about the transition from unpaid to permit parking, which would affect me as an Upper Lawrenceville resident. It | Parking is rarely a challenge, though as the neighborhood grows that will likely be more of a problem. Permitting will (hopefully) help. | 10 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 10 | 7 | Please try to put up protective barriers for bike lanes. Example: On Butler St. at 48th, people often drive into the bike lane to go around people turning left. A hard barrier would go a long way to protecting cyclists heading north on Butler. | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Add more mini parking lots. How? I don't know, but there have to be better solutions. Parking is a NIGHTMARE down there. | Yes | Yes | Yes | See above essay answer. | It's... fine. But see my above answer. It applies to Lower and Central Lawrenceville. It's hard to find parking anywhere. | Yes | Yes | See above answers. More space needs to be created for parking. There have to be better options - the unused pool at the Boys & Girls Club comes to mind. Maybe the city can use the space to knock down the pool and put additional parking that includes EV ch | Yes | Yes | Yes | Parking isn't as bad up here, but I fear it will be eventually. I support the hybrid zones as a trial, they wouldn't affect me directly. I'd like to see it in practice in my neighborhood and others. | ||
62 | Homeowner | Lack of bike lanes, aggressive and speeding cars | 10 | 8 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 6 | Speed humps and traffic calming on 46th St would be nice. Continuous bike lane connecting Lville to Strip District and Bloomfield would be nice | Not sure / need more information | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | What is the status of the Green Boulevard? | |||||||||||||
63 | Homeowner | I love that mobility is being more greatly considered! | I think meters potentially will make parking even harder on residential streets | Accessibility throughout the neighborhood for wheelchair users (curb cuts, store entrances, business restrooms, uneven sidewalks, etc.) | 1 | 10 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 3 | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | ||||||||||
64 | Homeowner | Increased meter times will likely bring more people from outside of the neighborhood parking in front of my house. Small price to pay for increased public seating. | Losing access to parking near my home because of people from outside the neighborhood parking there to skirt parking meters on Butler. Potential for sidewalk access loss with meter installation. | I think the neighborhood's lack of shared spaces like benches make spending time out in the community difficult. | 10 | 6 | 10 | 6 | 10 | 3 | I'd love to prioritize biking, walking, and bussing over funding for personal car use! | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | No | No | No | Mostly happy, though concerned about the increase in outsiders parking in the RPP area with the installation of meters. | No | No | Hybrid zoning penalizes residents and the enforcement increases traffic, noise, and pollution. Not ok with hybrid zoning, not worth the benefits. | No | No | No | Residential Permit Parking seems to work best as it discourages people not familiar with the hill from parking dangerously on narrow roads. I'm not sure expansion of the Residential Permit Parking would benefit those who live in the neighborhood in terms | |||||
65 | Homeowner;Commuter through Lawrenceville | I love the idea of a demand-driven program. I am a Shoupista (ever since I read the High Cost of Free Parking in 2005) and think it would be a big improvement. | Educating the public on how it will work; getting supply/demand numbers right; ease of use (need to download/use extra apps vs. street kiosks--but also preserving sidewalk space for pedestrians). | I am a daily bike commuter from Lawrenceville to Downtown, and have to dodge construction sites, as well as navigate traffic signals that are not optimized for cyclists. On my non-electric bike, going uphill is a challenging reality I have to contend with | 9 | 5 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 2 | Street trees, litter pickup teams, small grants for street art, occasional small grants for other needs of residents/owners. | I think I support it, but obviously a lot will come down to the option that is selected, and its implementation. | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I would most support a plan that allows some period of free parking, but would permit purchasing extra time. For example, first hour free (as it is now), can purchase more time, perhaps up to a maximum time limit. Maybe mandatory registration at a parking | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I would most support a plan that allows some period of free parking, but would permit purchasing extra time. For example, first hour free (as it is now), can purchase more time, perhaps up to a maximum time limit. Maybe mandatory registration at a parking | This is where my house is. In my opinion, it works pretty well as-is. When we need it, we use the visitor pass option on the website to add our guests. Our house seems to be far enough up the hill from Butler that we don't have much business district spil | No | No | I would most support a plan that allows some period of free parking, but would permit purchasing extra time. For example, first hour free (as it is now), can purchase more time, perhaps up to a maximum time limit. Maybe mandatory registration at a parking | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I would most support a plan that allows some period of free parking, but would permit purchasing extra time. For example, first hour free (as it is now), can purchase more time, perhaps up to a maximum time limit. Maybe mandatory registration at a parking | - We could experiment with the timing of RPP (7-7, 12-12) probably more easily than with the geographical scope of it. - I understand there are certian buildings (large apartments, mostly) that are not permitted to apply for RPP permits. I also heard tha | - I am underwhelmed by people complaining about the $20 annual cost, which is very cheap for what it gets us. - Most of the time, we don't have a parking problem, we have a "too lazy to walk a block or two" problem - As far as mobility goes, parking only |
66 | Homeowner | People who don't live here have to pay to park here | We are a family of 4 with one vehicle. Increasing gentrification of my neighborhood means that every year more neighbors have households with one car per person and many renovations from house flippers who's equipment eats up parking spaces. This means th | 10 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 5 | Not sure / need more information | No | No | No | Our parking problem is not something RPP and MED will fix. If there were more strict building codes, developers would not be building 4 story rooftop decks that eliminate existing families views from their homes, with 2 car garages built in that take stre | Guests. Doesn't RPP make it hard for guests I invite to come to my home? | |||||||||||||||
67 | Homeowner;Parent | Traffic | 8 | 6 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 5 | Not sure / need more information | No | I don't have an opinion | No | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | No | No | No | No | No | |||||||||||
68 | Homeowner | I support it. Pay parking should follow demand. It's not fair to businesses that operate during the morning and afternoon that their customers have to pay for parking while evening operated businesses customers don't have to pay | Pushing more cars (people) onto residential streets. Infrequent enforcement. | Pedestrian safety: cars not yielding to pedestrians in crosswalks. Cars parked in/near crosswalks blocking sight lines. Tripping over lifted/crumbling sidewalks, scooters parked on sidewalks. Commercial dumpsters blocking sidewalks. Traffic congestion. | 10 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 5 | Cleaning Business district, beautification. | Yes, if enforcement improves. | Enforcement has been dwindling in recent years. The hours of enforcement are not when it's needed. | Yes | Yes | Can code be modified to allow PPA to enforce all parking violations, some are currently police only violations | ||||||||||||||
69 | Homeowner | The increased revenue to use for mobility improvements from the increased visitors from other areas. | My only concern would be to include Lawrenceville residents in deciding how to use the newly generated funds for mobility improvements. | Getting people to walk, bike, or use the bus instead of driving when coming to Lawrenceville. | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 7 | Planting more street trees is also another way to calm traffic. | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | I love the fact that most of Lawrenceville does not require a parking permit. I always thought it was one of the best things about this neighborhood. I also specifically don't think it is needed in upper lawrenceville. | |||||||
70 | Homeowner | Lack of parking near residence. | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 5 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Yes | No | ||||||||||
71 | Homeowner | The opportunity to raise and use funds to support infrastructure in our community | None | As a pedestrian often walking a dog, sidewalk infrastructure is challenging (and often unsafe) to navigate - visibility at intersections, general speed of vehicles, closed sidewalks without a safe alternate route (construction or due to cars parking on th | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 5 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | It's fine, enforced regularly, parking not a problem and annual cost not a personal barrier | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||||||
72 | Renter | The increase of safety for walking around in our neighborhood | there's a lot of focus on Butler & creating space - which is great!! - but, we also need to address how broken our side street sidewalks are and how those are barriers for residents to walk down to Butler. We also need to address how people speed down sid | broken sidewalks!!! construction not providing signage that the upcoming sidewalk will be closed then needing to jaywalk across busy Butler | 10 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 5 | Yes | No | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | As someone who worked in lower L, seems like RPP would hurt workers - theres already so much limited parking there | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | No | Hybrid zones seem to make it harder to run in and out of businesses | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | No | I don't have an opinion | No | Paying $20 a year for not guaranteed parking spot on a public street is pretty frustrating and then needing to jump through hoops to have friends or family visit. If visitors are creating the mess here let them pay for the clean up | Using a parking study from 2015 is a hard sell. So much has changed in 8 years - from ride share, scooters, and remote work. I understand it's challenging to get new data but can we something more recent? | Seems like we should extend meters first then see if there's a need for RPP. If parking becomes too expensive or complicated, people will just stop coming to Lawrenceville. I'm looking forward to seeing how this develops! Thanks! | |||
73 | Homeowner | The funds from parking meter collection staying in the neighborhood and improving the mobility of Lawrenceville for all of our neighbors. | That the extended hours for parking meters is a more regressive way of improving our mobility. | Some of the sidewalks where I live, by the 40th street bridge, are uneven and are tripping hazards. And the road ,41st street, near Butler has been in rough shape for a couple of months now. We should also make some streets pedestrian only to make the nei | 9 | 10 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 10 | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | ||||||||
74 | Renter;Healthy Active Living Center member | Yes | OK | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||||||||||
75 | Renter;Healthy Active Living Center member | Yes, I won't have to walk when the place that I'm to is near. | Okay | Put lights on bus shelters and steps | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | I don't like it | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||||||
76 | Homeowner;Healthy Active Living Center member | I like living in Lawrenceville and I'd like to see improvements to sidewalks and bus shelters. I don't have a car and either walk or bus. Sitting in the rain and broken brick sidewalks are issues for me. Want grocery store in walking distance. | Scooters block sidewalks. | Brick sidewalks aren't straight. Need shelter from rain and place to sit while waiting for the bus. | 10 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 1 | Stop sign or signal @ 35th and Butler - trucks are big issue | Yes | Yes | No | No | Make Leech Street one way | ||||||||||||||
77 | Business Owner | The shutter idea is nice. Walking safety is excellent already. | Concerned it will turn clients away. We already get complaints about coming to park in Lawrenceville. When they arrive, they all saw and relieved that they don't have to pay for parking on our end. That's one of the benefits of our side of which has helpe | I don't really face challenges parking. That's why it's so nice not having to meters. The only thing I would say is there are a lot of strange people walking at night and not anyone around so walking to our cars at night is a concern. | 1 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | as far as safety measures, go walking It's very clear that it's already paved sidewalks on both side and very safe to walk on. Also, creating extra bus, shuttles and cycling areas is only going to bring more traffic. The main concern about traffic is the | No | No | No | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | No | No | there's not much parking available in the first place. there should be more laws created for residence. Businesses don't have much street or side parking as it is. Treating it as a permit would cause a lot of issues for customers. | ||||||||||
78 | Business Owner | Nothing | We do all day trainings and purchased our building partly based on free parking in Upper Lawrenceville. Where will we do for people who need to park all day? | No | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | No | No | No | |||||||||||||||
79 | Business Owner | Parking meters in upper Lawrenceville | For permitted parking, how/where will non resident workers and biz owners park? | We've long needed parking meters in upper Lawrenceville and people policing them. | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 5 | Not sure / need more information | No | I don't have an opinion | No | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | No | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | ||||||||||
80 | Renter | Increased revenue by extending metered hours to when people actually visit Lawrenceville Using that revenue to create better design for bikers, walkers, and residents | Visitors will not want to park in metered zones and instead will park in residential areas and could potentially reduce my ability to park near my residence | Not a lot of streetlights near the cemetery making walking home at night questionable | 10 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 4 | Yes | No | No | No | I live in upper Lawrenceville but visit my boyfriend that lives in lower Lawrenceville. Adding a RPP would make life more difficult considering I’d have to pay for parking every time I visited him. | Yes | Yes | Yes | I have no issues trying to find parking or navigating these roads | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | I live in upper Lawrenceville but my boyfriend lives in lower Lawrenceville. Adding a RPP would make life more difficult considering he’d have to pay for parking every time he visited me. Also, RPP never guarantees a spot. In my experience, the permit | I think adding revenue generating measures along butler is fine but impacting the residents with RPP will do more harm than good | ||||
81 | Homeowner | nothing | this is a money grab by the City | Make Arsenal 201 keep their renters on their property. This started because of 650 apartments involved. | Yes | No | No | No | Remove signs at bottom of 39th St and move them to Butler St where they belong for pay parking. Permit parking is nothing but a money grab by the city. Make Arsenal 201 renters park on Arsenal 201 lots not all over the side streets that is the biggest pro | |||||||||||||||||||||
82 | Renter;Healthy Active Living Center member | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 6 | 10 | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Lights at the bus stop at Shop & Save. It gets very dark or move the stop back over to Shop & Save. | ||||||||||
83 | Homeowner | Nothing | Residential Parking will get even worse. I don't go anywhere Wed-Sun now. I will be home locked for fear of not having a Parking spot for our van. I cannot get a handicap spot because we are a corner lot with a stop sign in front, no garage or spot in my | No handicap parking. No ability to leave and come home to a parking spot that isn't miles away. | 1 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 4 | I feel like those who come to visit the area do not want to pay for parking and will do anything to not pay. As a city resident when I go (rarely) to, for example, the South Side, I expect to pay and park in a lot. Maybe initiatives to teach those from ou | Not sure / need more information | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Yes | Yes | No it is a thousand times worse than it was prior to RPP | Yes | Yes | It is exponentially worse since RPP started. | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I would like handicap parking to be available to those who do not have a spot directly in front of their house. We park across the street, and therefore cannot have handicap parking. That's unfair. | Forcing landlords to have sufficient parking for their tenants would ease the situation. All of the new builds have 1 car allocation for a percentage of their tenants and previous properties that have parking do not necessarily have enough for even a perc | |||
84 | Homeowner;Business Owner | Changing parking on Main St near trace brewing is going to push cars onto howley/mintwood/cabinet and make it even worse for home owners. Trace is creating a problem that the residents of the neighborhood are going to bear the burden of. | Enforcing the law would go a lot further for pedestrian safety than creating more parking regulations will. Maybe enforce the laws regarding speeding, red light running and not yielding to pedestrians. Trace brewing and their parties and food trucks have | 10 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 10 | 10 | Enforce the laws that are on the books for drivers. | It should be temporary to see if anything changes. ALSO: I currently do not have permit parking, nor do I want permit parking. We dealt with this when children was built and my block was not for it then. This was a block by block decision then and parki | No | I don't have an opinion | A blanket answer for all areas is not a solution. Charlotte Street is different than the 3800 or 3900 blocks of howley or mintwood. Let the people who live on the blocks decide. I DO NOT want permit parking in our area. It has been fine since Childrens wa | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | No | How can I prevent permit parking in my area? I really do not want it. We do not need it. | |||||||||||
85 | Homeowner | I don't, we pay enough taxes & tolls | Why, it's fine the way it is | None | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Don't need any | No | No | No | It's fine the way it is, enforce what you have now | No | No | Same as above | IDK | No | No | No | No | No | Why | It's fine the way it us | No | |||
86 | Homeowner | I am in favor | To ensure the proposed funding is used appropriately to make lawrenceville a more pedestrian and bike friendly environment for residents. | Speeding in general and especially on 39th street (foster to penn), dangerous intersections at 40th/butler and 39th/penn | 10 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 8 | 1 | The funds should be used for the benifit of those residing in lawrenceville, the shuttle concept (while it would be nice) seems to be a benifit for those in the suburbs, and is very unlikely to actually reduce parking concerns without heavily restrictive | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | I am supportive of permit parking especially with restrictions to remove grace period and charge non residents hourly to fund other neighborhood improvements | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | No impact | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | |||||
87 | Homeowner | Trying to cross Butler street safely. | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 10 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Thank you for your time and efforts! | |||||||||
88 | Renter | The improvements would be much appreciated by pedestrians in our walkable neighborhood | If we're only talking about butler and Penn meters, I have no concerns in extending the hours of enforcement | Being a pedestrian can be difficult or dangerous at certain locations, I sometimes use alternatives (walking under 40th bridge to avoid butler and 40th intersection) to stay safe. | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | Yes | No | No | Doesn't seem necessary for this area. I have little issues parking there when I need to pick up items along this route with a car | No | No | I'm not sure that this area has a massive need, I have had little issues with visitors finding parking by me, on Willow and at Plummer and 45th where I lived before, but I'd support what other people in the area supported. I don't know if enforcement woul | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | No | I appreciate the effort made by you all in the info sessions! I think sometimes this issue goes hand in hand in how easy mass transit is, and how comfortable people are with using it. Driving isn't the only option even if you own a car! | |||||||
89 | Homeowner | I like the protections for residents. | 9 | 9 | 6 | 10 | 3 | 5 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | I do not live in that area so it does not affect me. | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||||||||||
90 | Homeowner | Discourage parking and thus reduce air pollution and reduce danger to pedestrians/cyclists | Too many cars, aggressive drivers, Butler street very unfriendly to cyclists | 10 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 1 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | I would love if you could also work to reduce minimum parking requirements for new developments. I notice that every new single family home has two off-street parking spaces, which both encourages car ownership and increases the price of housing. It also | ||||||||
91 | Renter;I help operate a booth at seasonal local markets hosted in our neighborhood and I was previously a Lawrenceville business employee. | Really excited that this conversation around mobility in Lawrenceville is happening and thank you for hosting multiple ways to provide feedback! I like all the features of this plan that can help make our neighborhood's design a little more people-centric | My main concern is that this seems like a great plan to increase parking revenue, but not necessarily a plan that will meaningfully solve a number of the problems listed in the survey below. I imagine I'd have a better understanding if I had attended one | The lack of enforcement of existing laws/ordinances. Cars blasting through 4-way stops, cars parked fully on the sidewalk, cars parallel parked egregiously far away from the curb making narrow roads even more narrow, cars parked at stop signs and/or hangi | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 8 | This is far more than a small local fund could accomplish on its own, but if extending the T from downtown to the Zoo via The Strip and Lawrencville were ever on the table, funds should be used to support that. | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No opinion | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | This question sort of covers my concern for all the zones -- will RPP be implemented for some zones and not others? If not everyone takes part, the zones without RPP would likely be inundated with people avoiding RPP tag fees and hybrid parking. How big | |||||
92 | Homeowner | Funding source | Will push parking into residential areas. | Unsafe intersections as a pedestrian and crowded streets (too narrow) as a driver | 8 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 3 | Not sure / need more information | I don't have an opinion | Yes | No | No | No | There is almost always parking available in this area. | No | No | There is a lot of parking on the streets available, with the exception of lower Lawrenceville | I would love some redesign of the driving/parking on numbered streets. Two way streets should often be one way. There should be better enforcement of no parking at curbs, which makes walking dangerous because drivers cannot see pedestrians (ex: 44th and F | ||||||||||
93 | Homeowner | I like almost all of it. Definitely need applicability of meters and enforcement to go much later into the evening in a district like this. Love the dynamic pricing. As a homeowner in the area, I'd probably like an RPP option in addition to the meters, bu | Enforcement. I get that the fund isn't going to be funded with enforcement (tickets). I hope there will still be strong enforcement, though. Unlike with other parking laws, such as parking on sidewalks, where there is absolutely no enforcement whatsoever, | Vehicles on sidewalks. It's illegal, but it's allowed without ever being addressed. It leads to degraded, obstructed, impassable, and dangerous sidewalks. Additionally, the signaling in some areas is garbage -- 55th and Butler, a walk signal comes up ONLY | 10 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 1 | Shuttle would be a ridiculous use of the funds. People should take the buses that already exists or take an Uber. They're coming to drink anyway -- they can leave their cars at home or park near a city bus stop. | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Do it. | ||||||
94 | Homeowner | Thinking about the community | None | When I am driving the traffic is terrible. People don't stop for pedestrians. No parking in central Lawrenceville. | 10 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 10 | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Yes | No | No parking meters. | |||||||
95 | Homeowner;Business Owner;Landlord | As a longtime resident, business owner, property owner, and landlord in the lawrenceville area, I am concerned this new proposed district will negatively affect my lifestyle and business. My clients use parking in the area to come to classes and this will | None | 5 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 1 | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | ||||||||
96 | Homeowner;Business Owner | More pressure on finding alternative modes of transportation not centered on automobiles | It is going to cause more conversations on 'lack' of parking which isn't necessary a big concern | Inability to cross streets safely as a pedestrian and no bicycle connection through Lawrenceville | 10 | 8 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 1 | Not sure / need more information | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||||||
97 | Lawrenceville Business Employee | More trees, public seating and better bus stops | That much of the money will be wasted on things such as bump outs and safety poles that do nothing but distract drivers. Bump outs do not slow drivers down and the poles just confuse people into paying more attention to the poles than the pedestrians. | None, I walk up and down the street shopping and eating and I cross the streets at intersections with lights or stop signs. | 1 | 10 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 5 | If we want to continue to attract great people to work in the area, making people pay more to go to work is not a healthy option. | No | No | No | No | No | No | Lawrenceville attracts some of the best people in the service industry. Respectful of their neighbors and giving great service to guests. This helps continue to attract people from other areas to come spend money here. By forcing these employees to have t | No | No | No | No | No | Is there no possibility of providing more parking such as taking current flat lots and building up to provide more parking? Using already unused lots on the weekend to direct people too? Providing parking for people who not only want to spend money here b | ||||||
98 | Homeowner | Funds to support mobility improvements in Lawrenceville | none | Crosswalk and sidewalk safety (as a pedestrian) and dedicated bike lanes/sharrows (as as cyclist) | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 7 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||||||||
99 | Homeowner | The lighting and seating | Focusing too much on parking instead of enhancing streetscapes and pedestrian and other transport mobility | Not many at all beyond normal for a city | 10 | 7 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 6 | Seating, lighting, and street trees | Yes | No | No | No | It is generally not enforced and not a good use of funds, should encourage and enable alternative transport for visitors and/or use funds for safety and streepacapes | No | No | No | Same as above | It is almost never enforced.. essentially useless | No | No | Same as above | No | No | No | |||
100 | Renter | squeeze out cars from neighborhood | money might be used to make things easier for non-ADA cars | Risk of dying when I try to get places without a car; not enough bus service | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 5 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | I want full RPP/hybrid; ideally no one should be coming into neighborhood without paying for parking | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | even just a small stretch starting at carrick rates (0.50/hr) could free up parking | need way in for residents on unwritten leases without utilities in their name | :) | ||||
101 | Homeowner | I think extending metered parking is a great idea. Lawrenceville is a very business place in the evenings with some of the best restaurants in the city. This is a great way to generate money for the community without hurting anyone. I also like the idea o | I live in upper lawrenceville, one block off of butler. My block sees a lot of traffic during rush hour and I believe it is because people want to avoid the traffic lights along butler street. At Stanton, they come up to Carnegie and the drive far too fas | 10 | 7 | 10 | 4 | 10 | 1 | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||||||||
102 | Homeowner | Funds for mobility improvement sounds like a good idea | Cost of parking on Butler and Penn will drive parkers onto neighborhood streets | Bad sidewalks make walking unpleasant and sometimes dangerous. | 10 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 3 | Not sure / need more information | Yes, we're happy with it. Except that renewing it each year with multiple documents is onerous. Renewal process should be simpler once eligibility is established. | No | I don't have an opinion | ||||||||||||||||
103 | Renter | Mobility improvement addresses outdated infrastructure | Introducing new costs to longterm residents who face already ballooning costs to stay a resident | Increased traffic moving at high speed and limited parking | 10 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 7 | 5 | A garage in the business district | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | n/a | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||||||
104 | Homeowner;Business Owner | I like that it takes both parking and encouraging more pedestrians into consideration at the same time, without being too car-centric or too pedestrian-centric. I also like how it takes care of the problem of Penn Avenue being free parking for hospital e | Penn Avenue is marked as a metered zone from Doughboy to 40th Street. While there are some businesses in that area, it is still majorly a residential area. I would prefer it to be permit-only, but it needs to be hybrid at the very least. Woolslayer Way | There are long, dark stretches that are unsafe for walking, but driving is also not an option due to parking issues | 10 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 10 | 4 | Bicycle lift on 40th Street! https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicycle_lift. | Yes | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I am very unsure about the metered parking. I need to know more from people who live in hybrid zones how that works. | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | Isn't it at least 90% residential there? And I feel like there are a lot of older residents | I love it. | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Please can we have it on Penn? | Please remember that many of these alley houses have no parking on their streets and would need access to permits if they came to the surrounding areas. | ||
105 | Homeowner | I think Butler and Penn draw people regardless, so might as well make more $ to be used for positive imporovements from that demand. | Someone is going to be upset no matter what is done or not done. | Cars go too fast; it's the same problem everywhere. | 10 | 10 | 10 | 6 | 10 | 1 | It's expensive, but I think a physical crossing guard and/or cop at Stanton & Butler and 40th & Butler for the entire duration of the morning and evening rush would be good for everyone. | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||||||
106 | Homeowner | Improved accessibility | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 7 | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | ||||||||||
107 | Homeowner | not real excited about it if it only extends parking meter times | I am not a business owner, but I believe this will impact the businesses that make our neighborhood so vital, do you really want them to go somewhere else. | other than walking on the sidewalks (they're dangerous) none. Fix the sidewalks. | 6 | 6 | 2 | 4 | not surre what traffic calming means and sidewalks need to be wider if you're going to add bus shelters. | Not sure / need more information | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | no impact on me | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Re: parking meters in Hybrid zones, would parking meters be placed on residential side streets? | |||||||
108 | Homeowner | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 1 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | |||||||||||||
109 | Homeowner;Renter;Business Owner;Landlord | I do not believe the funds will improve anything except add more expense to everyone and add money to the city's bottom line | "Cost", No real Improvement, Inconvience | None, but assume that will change | 5 | 5 | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | Use funds to enforce can/garbage laws/waste & cans out constantly | No | ||||||||||||||||||
110 | Homeowner | I like the investments in mobility needs. | We need traffic calming on Butler in 9/10th Ward. People crossing Butler street at 49th and between Stanton and 52nd need more visible crosswalks. | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 3 | I think investing in the Green Blvd. to get bikes away from Butler St. | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||||||||
111 | Homeowner | More $ for the neighborhood | People will park in permit areas to avoid meters | My parked car has been hit so many times it doesn’t even phase me anymore. People blow through stop signs especially on Davison and drive the wrong way on one way streets especially 45th. | 3 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 5 | Not sure / need more information | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||||||||||||||||
112 | Homeowner;Business Owner;Landlord | Please don't do this. It would be incredibly detrimental to our staff and all of our students. We host hundreds of people daily and adding parking meters would cost us greatly on many levels. | People doing yoga and buying juice, and teachers/ employees who have to spend long hours at our businesses, it would be a major unnecessary expense and cost our businesses in convenience and well beyond | None. Love it. | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Please do not add meters to Penn Avenue. We cannot afford a shift of this nature. | No | No | No | No | Please don't do this. Our employees will deeply suffer. | No | No | No | Our employees and students will suffer from this change greatly. Hundreds of people daily. It's not useful to us at all. | Yes | No | No | Please do not add meters to Penn avenue, and night enforcement would be terrible for our evening classes, which are daily. | No | No | No | Please don’t make any changes. This is not useful to the businesses of this area | Please do not make this incredibly detrimental change for our businesses. | |
113 | Homeowner;Business Owner | Accessibility improvements, fixing sidewalks, unobstructed walking | Parking for employees, parking for family and friends visiting | unsafe sidewalks with cars parked on them, cracks and dips, rocks filling tree cutouts | 8 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 1 | updated signage | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | With the narrow streets and people looking for parking, there are many hit and runs on residential side streets, there is also increased noise pollution late at night (during bar hours) from those parking and driving on side streets | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Would love to see more safe walking and rolling options for people living with disabilities and navigating our neighborhood. Also would appreciate accountability for new (within last 5/6 years) buildings and developments to follow ADA accessibility standa | |||||
114 | Homeowner | Improving pedestrian/cycling comfort/safety and sprucing up sidewalks and the area | Too much RPP/metering can easily detract people from coming. Also, if additional RPP/hybrid areas are added, it would be very nice if Lawrenceville were not split into so many zones so I could temporarily park a few blocks away before/after work and not h | Cycling is less safe than it could be, pedestrian night-time lighting could be better, and vehicle traffic in general seems significantly higher than 2-3 years ago | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | Yes | No | No | Lower Lawrenceville being a separate RPP zone would be a significant disadvantage - a single RPP zone for the general lower, central, and upper Lawrenceville areas would be much nicer for residents who run errands before/after work. | No | No | No | It is very nice having some areas that are not RPP at all. | Yes, overall it is good. | No | No | No | No | No | Upper Lawrenceville doesn't seem to have significant street parking congestion like Central lawrenceville, so RPP/hybrid doesn't make much sense to me here as it would detract more than it helps. | ||||
115 | Homeowner | I'd prefer the increased revenue go to the City's general fund - Lawrenceville is already well ahead of many other neighborhoods in terms of quality of infrastructure | Aggressive drivers come to Leslie field for baseball games. They park on the sidewalks and block the crosswalk at 46th and Lawrence Street. Hospital workers park for free on 46th between Lawrence Street and Butler Street and walk up the hill during the | 9 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 2 | I support more revenue but don't think it should go just to Lawrenceville | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | |||||||||
116 | Homeowner | I like that the funds will be used to improve the neighborhood with a focus on mobility. As Lawrenceville continues to become a more popular destination, resident concerns and livability should always be centered | Enforcement. Also if the funds will be dispersed / used in a timely manner, and if residents will get to have a say in how the funds are used (beyond this survey) | Walking in the neighborhood is scary. I walk daily in the neighborhood, and I have close encounters with cars on a weekly basis. I'm sure this is extra dangerous for children and disabled residents. Sidewalk safety, traffic control, intersection and cross | 9 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 3 | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I'm unsure still, because I'm wary of enforcement here. If it's enforced, I will gladly support, especially a hybrid zone in certain high-traffic parts (like Penn Ave). But if I have to pay for basically no change (aka cars can still park illegally or lon | Yes | Yes | Yes | I think this area will benefit from RPP given the amount of businesses and nightlife, more so than other parts of Lawrenceville. | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Unsure about nighttime hours because I don't live in this part of the neighborhood and don't feel like I have an accurate understanding of current usage - I'll defer to residents on it. | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | As above, enforcement. Also, will there be a fund or a waiver for residents who cannot afford the $20 / year fee? | Thanks! | ||||
117 | Homeowner | Increase funds for improving the neighborhood transit and parking. Encourage people to take public transit or alternatives | lack of enforcement, forcing residents to pay for parking. Permit holders should be able to park on their own street. | crossing 40th street at Butler street; crossing 48th Street at Butler and Foster. | 7 | 5 | 8 | 10 | 5 | 8 | Build parking lots | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | The only problem we had is with contractors parking on the street. The permitee must unravel the maze that is PPA's website to obtain a variance to allow the contractor to park. Needs to be easier. | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | ||||||
118 | Renter;Lawrenceville Business Employee | I'm excited to potentially see some sidewalks repaired, as well as parking solutions. | Other than congestion, I don't personally face many, other than the occasional sidewalk in shambles. | 10 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 9 | 3 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||||||||
119 | Homeowner | I do not want RPP parking in my neighborhood or on Smallman St | Proposals may negatively impact the local economy by deterring visitors | None | 10 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | No | No | No | No | Please do not enact any parking restrictions in Lower Lawrenceville | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | None - please do not enact in Lower Lawrenceville | Please do not enact permit parking in Lower Lawrenceville. The ticketing will not lead to improved parking for residents and it may negatively impact business with no appreciable benefit to the community. It appears to be a lose-lose | |||||
120 | Homeowner;Business Owner;Landlord | Pedestrian & cyclist safety | Reducing vehicular traffic and large truck traffic. Who will maintain the planted areas proposed for traffic calming? | The alley ways are filled with litter and potholes. Our neighbor across the street tripped in an alley pothole and broke her ankle. | 10 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 5 | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | NA | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | |||||||
121 | Homeowner | Nothing. It would force visitors to park in residential areas. To prevent this you propose a $20 residential yearly parking permit. Why should the residents have to put out more $. | See above. | Being handicapped and having had my family doctor fill out papers to get a handicapped parking sign by my house. But on busy days, times any handicapped car can park there. Not fair to truly handicapped residents. It should be for them only. Also why do w | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Put more trees in and plant flowers around them. Lawrenceville is no green enough. | No | No | No | No | Residential parking is a real mess . This is not the way to address it. | No | No | No | No!! All bad ideas!! None of this would help the residents. Go back to the drawing board and try to find more ideas so the residents are happy. We pay enough in taxes and we need help not be told to buy a parking permit. | Not enough handicapped spots. And parking meters are far away enough from cars that the handicap park in. Meters for handicap spaces should be right at the parking space. | No | Visitor hybrid parking should not be allowed in residential hybrid parking areas. And if a handicapped person has a hybrid car, they should be allowed to still park in their handicapped spot! | Why not allow a few handicap residents be involved in this planning? | ||||||
122 | Homeowner | Increased funding for improvements, focus on safety | By only focusing on Butler Street for traffic calming and safety improvements parallel side streets will see an increase in already dangerous driving. | Drivers not stopping sufficiently at stop signs, yielding to pedestrians, and speeding. Sidewalks in poor condition and not properly cleared in winter. | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 7 | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | No | No | No | Perhaps there is appetite for this on other streets but we don;t have significant parking issues on Hatfield due to larger industrial spaces and no large apartment complexes besides IW Abel. | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | |||||||
123 | Renter | If this money goes towards making Lawrenceville more Ada accessible then this is great. And i think we need a lot more bus shelters along Butler Street, as I occasionally ride the bus and can'tt tell you if there are any shelters on butler street. I'm not | A big concern is that business owners might get less business if you charge after 6 pm. Additionally, this is something that south side has implemented and how is that going? Is it bringing in the revenue that is needed? It seemed to be implemented to que | I would say it's minimal. I'e lived in Lawrenceville since 2010- upper Lawrenceville- and the last 5 years it seems like there has been more and more traffic. However, that doesn't deter me from driving and inching along Butler Street. I have a nice advan | 5 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 5 | 10 | I think what has been laid out seems like a really good use to the funds. | Not sure / need more information | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Yes | Yes | Fine | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | Thanks for all that you do! | |||||
124 | Renter | Not a fan of permit parking to park where I live I'll end of with tickets all the time | Bikers who do not follow the rules of the roads And litters cut off cars a lot I actually had a drunk biker run into my car because of carelessness | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | No | No | No | No | NO PERMIT S | No | No | No | No permits! | No | No | No | No | NO PERMITS | No permits | ||||||
125 | Homeowner | better regulation and enforcement of street parking, accelerating sidewalk repairs, traffic calming measures ti improve pedestrian safety, improve bicycle infrastructure. | increased parking on side/residential streets as an unintended consequences | safely cross streets on foot due to cars not stopping for pedestrians and cars blocking sight lines when parked on corners | 10 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 10 | 3 | improved sidewalks | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Will RPP improve how and where cars park on streets? Many cars park on corners and sidewalks, making walking around the neighborhood more difficult. Will RPP enforcement also enforce other parking regulations as a side-effect? | ||||||
126 | Homeowner | Parking meters on commercial corridors incentivize the use of alternative modes of transportation and the fund is a great idea to address an extremely antiquated transit corridor. | Negatively impacting nearby residents. | Residential streets overcrowded with parked vehicles makes for poor visibility at intersections which results in dangerous crossings. | 10 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 1 | Satellite parking won't ease congestion in the neighborhoods, only alleviate parking. | Yes | I don't have an opinion | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | I don't have an opinion | Central Lawrenceville clearly has the worst issues with parking. I don't live in this section but do on occasion try to park here, typically going past Willow St to reliably find a spot. I know residents are frustrated by the limited parking, but my under | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | I don't have an opinion | II never had an issue finding parking within a block of our home. | |||||
127 | Homeowner | Improvements to infrastructure. Our street is just outside the rpp zone, so we get a lot of people parking here both for business, but also all day to work at the businesses school, Canterbury, etc. Evening enforcement would be critical to our support, | Reduced traffic to businesses with more difficult/expensive parking. Possible limits on number of owner permits issued per property could be both good and bad depending... | Ease of getting around with strollers (when our kids were younger) and bikes. Blind turn from 38th onto Penn in vehicles is very dangerous. | 10 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 9 | Yes | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | Hybrid maybe, depending on number of permits/temp passes issued per household for our guests etc. | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Works pretty well. Having the grace period is nice for quick trips to businesses without so much hassle of paying for parking. | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | If most of the neighborhood becomes permitted parking, what options will workers at the businesses have for parking that they need all day? | We need to consider traffic to businesses, and how much pay parking will effect that. We have our struggles with parking as residents, but we also love living here because of the thriving business scene, and the fact is, a lot of people won't come if park | |||||
128 | Homeowner | Added lights, seating. Curb cut ideas for reducing dangers to pedestrians at intersections | Seating ideas may become outdated and unused. Avoiding things like the glowing cubes in Garfield, for example, those are so weird and not used for anything. | Crossing (as a pedestrian) at Butler and Main. It really needs a walk-only timer. It's a dangerous corner! | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 5 | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | It's fine. | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | |||||||
129 | Homeowner | As a bicyclist, traffic in Lawrenceville is a bit of a pain, but this new plan doesn't really address that. I usually bike through the cemetery, but when I bike down butler it isn't particularly fun. One can of course go through the neighborhood on the bi | 8 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 1 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | I'll add this comment here - parking has gotten hard in upper Lawrenceville (and on my block), but honestly I don't think this will help. I think most of the parking is residents - it's just that people keep building new houses and putting in garages and | |||||||||
130 | Lawrenceville Business Employee | More money going into the blah blah. | It'll just push people into residential parking | 10 | 10 | 1 | 6 | 10 | 1 | There should, in no way, be money used for car based infrastructure. It should be (and it seems like thats what you're aiming for) turned into less of a highway, more of a neighborhood. Bike infrastructure is key, Lawrenceville is terrible to bike in. Esp | Not sure / need more information | Yes | No | Yes | I quite like the hybrid idea. Like residents have use, but it allows for business client use | Yes | No | Yes | I quite like the hybrid idea. Like residents have use, but it allows for business client use | No | Yes | I quite like the hybrid idea. Like residents have use, but it allows for business client use | Yes | No | Yes | I quite like the hybrid idea. Like residents have use, but it allows for business client use | ||||
131 | Homeowner | Not finding a parking space near my home. | 5 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 5 | 5 | Not sure / need more information | Yes | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | No, still have problems finding a space at times. | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Yes | |||||||||
132 | Homeowner | Metered parking the length of butler. | Changes to parking on side streets. | Pedestrian safety at crossings without traffic lights | 10 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 6 | 1 | Do not meter streets. | No | No | No zone parking. No meters on side streets. Focus changes solely on Butler and Penn | No | No | Keep changes focused on Butler only. | Yes | Yes | No | I don't have an opinion | No | What is the relationship between LU/LC and City Council. As a new member of LU but long time Lville resident I fail to see how the organization is pro neighborhood, and not just pro developer. Private developers are only beholden to their shareholders. | |||||||
133 | Renter | Residents have a say where the funds will go. | Parking is difficult to find on the weekends. | 8 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 7 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | Yes, but it doesn't really affect me. | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | ||||||||
134 | Bloomfield resident, frequent Lawrenceville pedestrian | Charging for parking beyond 6pm will incentivize more people to bike and take public transit when traveling to Lawrenceville | I imagine unless enforcement hours for RPP are extended like South Side, a lot of cars will park in RPP zones rather than pay for street parking on Butler | Cars driving too fast on Butler and Penn, creating dangerous conditions for pedestrians | 10 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 1 | Maybe help extend the hours of Lawrenceville's primary bus routes even later into the night | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | I don't have an opinion | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Some of my friends occasionally host church events at their house in the evening throughout the week, are there plans to help RPP holders get short duration guest passes for several cars rather than the current single pass for 1 car? Or would attendees ne | ||||||
135 | Lawrenceville Business Employee | I think it's a good idea. | possibly residential parking will take more of a hit. | personally, none, but for my business, not enough accessible parking spots | 10 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||||||||
136 | Lawrenceville Business Employee | The extended hours of the parking meter collection into the evening hours | Installing new meters close to the business I work at | Parking-We have 2 lots and have had several issues with having spaces for our customers | 5 | 7 | 9 | 3 | 7 | 9 | More garbage cans along Butler Street | Not sure / need more information | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||||||
137 | Business Owner | I like that these plans intend to fund adding accessibility and safety provisions throughout the neighborhood. | I think that adding parking meters to the 10th before it shows sufficient retail growth will curb stumble-upon foot traffic and drive away businesses. Personally, I'm also very concerned about how my workers (we have 30 small business owners in our locati | In the 10th, I have not experienced mobility issues other than people drive a little too fast at times. However, outside of having a larger police presence in the area, I don't know how nicer sidewalks, more bikes, more bus stops, etc, will curb that tren | 10 | 7 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 1 | I do, and I don't. I recognize that some changes are needed to better the community, for people who live here. But people live here because of the business culture of the area, and I fundamentally think that this proposal will hurt businesses, specificall | No | No | No | These plans will actually hurt businesses. As a business owner, I cannot support a plan that will hurt businesses. | No | I don't have an opinion | No | My answer is the same as above. I don't know whether I support longer enforcement hours in this region, but I definitely do not support a hybrid zone. | NA | No | No | It is concerning that parking enforcement is being discussed here, because I was told it was not the end goal. Though obviously, that will end up being the result. Lawrenceville gets none of the money from enforcing parking, it goes to the city. I was tol | No | No | No | I don't believe that any area of Lawrenceville should have extended RPP zones or hybrid zones. Small business owners in these districts were told that this isn't even on the table right now, so once again it is distressing to be asked these questions. I w | None | Please do not put meters in the 10th! During the week, no one is parked up on Penn avenue in Garfield. They park on the side streets, or they wait until the meters are no longer enforced to park in front of those businesses. I know this for a fact - We ha | |
138 | Business Owner;Landlord | In favor of the improvements, but against the new funding coming from parking meters. We already pay taxes and the improvements should be completed without double dipping on funding. | Most importantly, there are many residential units on Butler Street that will be left without a viable parking alternative once meters are installed. Creating new revenue from parking could greatly hinder the momentum in Upper Lawrenceville. | None | Sidewalks and uniform lamppost lighting | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | The absence of parking meters has allowed Upper Lawrenceville to catch up to the rest of the neighborhood and adding them could dampen the momentum. | Can you identify a Pittsburgh neighborhood that has benefitted from the MED? What are the specific improvements are not otherwise stakeholder entitlements as included in the City of Pittsburgh budget. | |||||||||||
139 | Homeowner;Business Owner;Landlord | Very little. When metered parking was implemented, it made it noticeably more difficult for residential parking spots. By requiring a majority of residents on a street to approve permit parking, the houses that have parking are disinclined to approve perm | It will continue to make residential parking more difficult to find for residents. Been asking for years to get permit parking. Especially on streets adjacent/parallel to Butler and Penn. | None | 10 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 10 | 5 | Not without permit parking!! | Yes | Yes | Yes | Permit parking please! | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Yes | No | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | ||||||
140 | Homeowner | An opportunity to park near our homes. Projected funds to help fix up the neighborhood. | One option is to place meters on streets, that kind of negates the reason for RPP and I don't believe it would change things much. | Currently it's people parking on the streets and taking the bus downtown or walking to Children's Hospital. Weekends are a struggle for parking as well. | 6 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | Upgrading crosswalks (40th Street) intersection as well numerous on Butler Street. Residential sidewalk repair (not businesses), potholes in the alley ways | Yes | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Yes | No | I am not a supporter of the hybrid idea. | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | The city is short handed as it is to keep up with parking enforcement, will the city be willing to hire more employees for parking enforcement? | |||||||
141 | Lawrenceville Business Employee | Streetscaping improvements, bike and ped focus | I drive, bike, walk, and take the bus in Lawrenceville. More places to lock my bike would be nice, but there's been enough to make do. The intersection of 40th and Butler can feel treacherous on a bike during peak hours, mostly worrying about people who m | 10 | 10 | 6 | 9 | 7 | 8 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | I think the bike infrastructure is as good as it gets for small streets, and same feeling for traffic calming. The shuttle sounds great, but would it get used? Is the one that goes from downtown to the South Side still functioning? Curious to know what re | Thanks! | |||||||||||||||
142 | Homeowner | Use of funds for more pedestrian and cyclist safety, beautification of the neighborhood. | - Specific indications about how the funds generated will be used. It would be a big shame if the money ends up unspent in an account because it's too much trouble for it to be allocated to projects for public good. - If enforcement hours increase on But | As a motorist, cyclist, and pedestrian, aggressive/impatient drivers like to speed on roads with fewer obstructions -- e.g. going up 44th st above Davison St is a popular place for motorists to lay on the gas, which is also where I cycle uphill to Penn av | 9 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 5 | Speed humps or other traffic calming measures! e.g. something on 44th near Hugo Way / Bruce would be nice. | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | (I live in this zone.) It's working well today I think. Enforcement could be better but I am seeing more PPA vehicles these days so I think that is improving. I live just far enough from butler (Bessemer St) that we don't typically see a surge of vehicle | Yes | Yes | Mentioned on the prior page, but RPP enforcement should be extended to encompass hours of the metered parking enforcement on butler street, should that be extended. I've answered YES to the hybrid option because it simplifies enforcement, but I am unsure | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | To consolidate from the other parts: - When will we see clarity on the process and allocation of the revenues from the parking? - Will any hybrid RPP extensions also be subject to the dynamic pricing as well (I feel like it should)? | Thank you for the open house sessions, it was great to discuss this with several folks including LU, LC, and Deb Gross's office, which gave me more perspective. In general I now support this proposal. I think we need to make sure there is flexibility to c | |||
143 | Business Owner | Car lot at 5332-4 has cars parked on Butler Street for Months, months, months. bumper to bumper. Can not sweep, can not get through their cars. They are always there, night and day. | Paid parking places are taken by non-paying businesses. | 1 | 1 | 10 | Have handicap areas no longer used removed. 5326 Butler Str | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Please have unused cars removed from Butler St. They are a constant problem and are always there. | ||||||||||
144 | Homeowner;Business Owner | It's attempting to address a big concern of mineâ specifically related to current parking limitations for residents (esp. elder neighbors), and the impact planned developments will have. I like the proposed improvements along butler that will provide bett | I am concerned about the traffic (both volume and driving behavior) that will result from the new development at the end, where 42nd feeds directly into the current Foundry parking lot and future structure. Driving behavior can be aggressive and fast for | We are fortunate to have a garage rental close to us on 42nd Street, but that is rare. Our guests struggle to find parking on most days. | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 8 | Generally, I support all of these proposed efforts. | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I'm less knowledgable of this area and would defer to the residents and business owners. | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I'm concerned about the hybrid model and left wondering if it is equitable/accessible for everyone. If it makes it easier for residents to park, then great. But then I wonder does this hybrid model just make it so people with higher incomes have access to | I would be curious to understand how this approach helps. Does This current parking limitation just push parking into our area? | I don't have an opinion | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | ||||
145 | Business Owner | very little | Southside has proven the money is not returned to the neighborhood | none | 3 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 8 | increased police presence | No | No | No | you have a lot of churches schools and retail that this would impact | No | No | happy | No | No | No | No | No | |||||||
146 | Lawrenceville Business Employee | Nothing | none | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | central has a lot of businesses. we need the parking for the non-residential consumers to be able to easily park and shop. | no | No | No | No | No | No | |||||||
147 | Business Owner | New sidewalks- those are so needed! | More meters might lead to more frustrated customers trying to find parking | Finding parking in general- would be great if a lot could be built somewhere | 5 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 5 | Not sure / need more information | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | ||||||||
148 | Renter | 5 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 4 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | |||||||||||
149 | Business Owner;Landlord | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | Not sure / need more information | No | No | No | I would be more supportive if efforts to add more off street parking besides the current 33 off street spaces that we have for the entire business district. It is obvious that there are not only no efforts to address this but quite the opposite. | No | No | No | I will be more supportive when business interests and employees are given equal interests and benefits. Workshop meetings with business owners, employees, and shoppers would be a good start. | This is feedback (there is no space to write in the feedback section) A one hour visitation period is far too short. While business owners are essentially being given the message that parking for their employees and customers isnt all that necessary and | |||||||||||||
150 | Lawrenceville Business Employee | I like that more funds would be generated | Concerns about parking for employees of Lawrenceville businesses, like myself. This will put a financial strain on us as well as safety concerns if we are having to park farther away (or pay at metered parking) | Finding a free place spot to park in. The side streets are vary narrow and my car has been side-swiped twice. This has cost me $1500 out of pocket to repaire | 1 | 10 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 4 | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | Not Applicable | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Can businesses apply for these parking permits? | ||||||
151 | Homeowner | The RPP on Harrison St. People leave cars/vans/trucks on our street all the time and there's no way to enforce getting rid of them. Enforcing commercial loading off of Butler or in designated areas only. Creating parking using old unused cut outs. | Mobility should include upkeep of the roads. Berlin Way for example is nearly undriveable. | Parking in lower and central LV is barely existent. New parking areas in the busiest areas need to be created. Also the intersections on 44th St at Plummer and Foster frequently present a blind turn on to 44th St because of the proximity of parked cars at | 6 | 8 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 8 | shorter term parking (15-30 mins) to increase turnover of spots and a little more predictability | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||||||
152 | Homeowner | 10 | 10 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 2 | Has there been a study on the feasibility of parking lines along Stanton Avenue and other major roads? In Etna there are parking spots on residential streets (such as Highland Ave & Vilsack St). This could benefit Stanton, where often more than one spot i | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | No | Yes | No | The only parking issues we face are in the evening hours, so I would prefer that enforcement be from 4pm-midnight so that anyone doing work on our house isn't as concerned with enforcement. It only seems to be along Stanton that there are parking issues w | Keep doing what you're doing. I appreciate you all and your work, even though my life has been too hectic to take an active role in any of it. You do a great job at communicating with residents and providing me with multiple opportunities to provide input | ||||||||
153 | Homeowner;Lawrenceville Business Employee | Opportunity to invest in safety improvements in the neighborhood. | Distribution of funds. | Pedestrian safety: distracted drivers, speeding drivers, drivers ignoring crosswalks. | 10 | 3 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 3 | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Thanks for doing this work! | ||||||||
154 | Homeowner | That people coming from outside the neighborhood would contribute to needed upgrades from their added congestion and that hopefully people will be encouraged to use other forms of less intrusive transportation. | That it could hurt local business if demand pricing is not implemented properly. | Crumbling sidewalks. Blocked sidewalks. Cars parking too close to corners. Too narrow streets for 2-way traffic plus bikes. Poor implementation of traffic light vs walk/don't walk signal timing. Poor traffic flow. | 10 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Not enough enforcement. | No | No | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Traffic congestion, bike safety, and property damage would be greatly improved if streets were converted to one-way as is common in every other older city. | ||||||||
155 | Homeowner | Mobility enhancements! Particularly interested in better serving pedestrians / making Lawrenceville as walkable as possible (plus added parking to enable people walking around) | We often have guests in the evening hours, and like that they can park near our house in a permit zone. Don't want them to have to pay for metered parking later or be unable to park in permit zone until later. Increased RPP guest passes per residence woul | Sidewalks are small and occasionally poorly maintained / blocked by construction. Parking is tough for guests. | 10 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 2 | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Can a change be made to add more than one visitor pass per residence? Amid changes would like to ensure residents & their guests have convenient parking | My concern with shifting RPP hours is it makes it tougher for guests to visit residents by forcing them to pay or park far away. Hybrid zones could help here, but I do like retaining dedicated RPP zones where there's less demand so residents know space wi | ||||||
156 | Business Owner | Sidewalk repairs and general ADA oriented upgrades. | Late night parking meters. Parking in Lawrenceville is already daunting to many customers. The looming threat of a parking ticket all the way up until midnight could certainly deter our current customer base. We are a PM operating business, and guests do | 6 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 3 | Not sure / need more information | I don't have an opinion | No | No | No | This is where my business is located. I'm having trouble envisioning where at all our customers will be able to park. | No | No | I'm not entirely opposed to placing meters in the RPP areas - but I am to the meters running past 6pm. | I don't have an opinion | No | No | Where would the meters be in the RPP areas? Will there be any free parking at all left for visitors? | |||||||||
157 | Homeowner;Business Owner;Building Owner | Nothing. It does nothing for parking, bringing more businesses to the neighborhood, makes it more expensive for shoppers and diners to come into the area. There really isn't a set plan, just a lot of, we can do this, and this, and this. There isn't eve | Look above. If upgrades are needed, then have the city pay for it through our tax dollars already being collected. Businesses of all sizes, and residents of all incomes, will find Lawrenceville a less desirable place to be - and move out. Also, limits | The only one I can think of is the crossing at 43rd street and Butler. Do what they did along Stanton Avenue, and place a speed bump. Done, without having to raise the costs of visiting and doing business in Lawrenceville. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | None. Let's not enact this plan. | No | No | No | No | Let's not enact this plan. | No | No | No | Let's not enact this plan. | No | No | let's not enact this plan | No | No | No | Stop making it hard for small businesses along Butler Street. This is not any part of this plan that will allow businesses here to prosper. | |||
158 | Homeowner;Business Owner | Expanded metering is good for our block since it would open up spaces for customers. Any pedestrian safety improvements are appreciated since the street crossings at 48th and Butler and Butler St in general are dangerous. | Street safety and mobility measures will take time and money and may not get started for years. A first phase of simple crossing lines with signs would be relatively inexpensive and would have an immediate impact. | Crossing Butler St at 48th St is very dangerous since vehicles race down Plummer to shortcut for the 40th St bridge. Its really a right turn but drivers regard it as an extension of Butler St, and many do not even use a turn signal. Speed bumps on Plummer | 10 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 5 | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | ||||||||
159 | Business Owner;Landlord | I am absolutely not in favor! | What makes Lawrencville a growing destination is the BUSINESSES! We need a parking garage, not bump outs and special parking for EV. Only the wealthy can even afford an EV, yet we are giving them preferred parking? Not a fan of any of this. None of it mak | We need MORE parking not less. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Use the money to buy a parking garage! You will generate all the income you want via a paid parking garage | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | |||||||
160 | Renter;Business Owner | Scooters, Random Bridge and Street Closures/Construction - especially during rush hour | 2 | 5 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 5 | Not sure / need more information | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | ||||||||||
161 | Landlord | Nothing | Parking for businesses | None | 10 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | Calling this the mobility enhancement is so misleading. Parking enforcement is not the issue. We need more parking options or better public transportation | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | |||||||||
162 | lived here all my life | trying to help parking situation | People parking on side streets | not enough parking | 3 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 9 | build a parking garage | I don't think parts of it would work | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | before you had to get signatures for RPP, now people don't answer door. How will this be done? I still think people coming for dinner and show will park anywhere no matter what we do. | I feel you are hurting the workers. They are here all day whereas others are only coming for a few hours. When a show lets out people don't want to wait for a shuttle. | |||||||||||||
163 | Homeowner | parking on my street | 4 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 4 | Not sure / need more information | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||||||||||||||||||
164 | Business Owner | We like the idea of having the funds go towards improvements in Lawrenceville. | Our private lot may get used more since people coming in have to pay for on street parking. | Traffic. There is a lot of traffic on Butler and there has not been a whole lot done to ease it. There are also not enough parking lots/garages, I think that is something most other neighborhoods (especially ones as populated as Lville) have that we don't | 5 | 5 | 9 | 8 | 5 | 9 | Not sure / need more information | Yes | No | Yes | No | |||||||||||||||
165 | Homeowner | Willow street has become a parking lot for non residents from visitors to the Bay 41 building to those going to butler street. As residents we need the permitted parking to discourage abuse of leaving cars or commercial vehicles here | 8 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 7 | 5 | Yes | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||||||||||
166 | Business Owner | I believe that it will increase safety, create parking turnover, and bring in funds for infrastructure improvement. | ability to enforce. | pedestrian and bike safety. | 9 | 9 | 9 | 5 | 9 | 5 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||||||||
167 | Church on 37th Street and Arts School soon | So long as it is in the neighborhoods and not in front of the churches | That people will have to pay to go to a church function | Parking..... | 10 | 9 | 7 | 7 | 10 | 9 | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Stacked Parking would solve all your problems | Yes | Yes | Yes | As it stand now.... I am happy | No | Yes | Stacked Parking | Yes | Yes | Stacked Parking | I am thinking of the problem that might come around when we get the school up and running | Stacked Parking | |||
168 | Business Owner | The demand for more parking in evenings and weekends is very exciting! Parking demand reflects the energy and excellence of both new and long-standing businesses, bars, and restaurants in Lawrenceville! I support all the ideas that have encouraged visitor | Biking connections need improvement | 6 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 1 | Yes | I don't have an opinion | Yes | I don't have an opinion | Yes | I don't have an opinion | Yes | ||||||||||||||
169 | Renter | This is a great way to capitalize on the traffic we see in our business district, and allow for residents to still have access to on street parking. | I have some concerns/would like more information about the proposed shuttle. | curb improvements, more LED traffic signals, safe improvements for pedestrians. there should also be some conversations on how to mitigate any additional traffic from additional rideshares going to and from Butler Street. | 10 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 5 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I need to know more from residents how they feel it's going | I don't have an opinion | Yes | are there any implications for policing here with enforced RPP? | |||||||
170 | Business Owner | This would allow for funds to create better mobility changes in the neighborhoods | none at the moment. | BIKE LANES!!! I have a bike to commute but am terrified to bike in Lawrenceville! Butler street is a nightmare for bikers, and many people run the stop signs on the back streets so it's hard to trust my life with biking in this neighborhood. | 10 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 10 | 4 | Bike and walking infrastructure will change this community & city for the better. Get the riverfront trail connected to downtown and so many lives would be changed for the better! | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Just make sure there are places for non residents to park or it will dramatically effect businesses. | Yes | No | Yes | Just make sure there are places for non residents to park or it will dramatically effect businesses. | No | Yes | Just make sure there are places for non residents to park or it will dramatically effect businesses. | Yes | No | Yes | Just make sure there are places for non residents to park or it will dramatically effect businesses. | Connect the riverfront trail!! Also it would be great if you could kick out the creepy drunk guys at the riverfront trailhead on 43rd. As a woman walking the trail I do not appreciate their presence and catcalls objectifying women. It makes that end of th | ||
171 | Renter | I like that the proceeds would go to mobility enhancement in the neighborhoods | I am concerned that the parking fees would draw more visitors to butler street into the more residential areas to park causing some frustration with homeowners and renters in these parts of the neighborhood | I do not face many challenges but am aware that things could be much friendlier towards cyclists and that folks need to watch their speed while driving through the more residential streets of the neighborhood | 10 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 10 | 1 | Yes, but as long as the district is restricted to the more commercial/ less residential streets and areas of Lawrenceville | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | What about folks who mark spots with chairs? Can we please designate some spaces in front of the post office on 42nd St. for postal customers only! I am tired of getting yelled at by folks for parking in "claimed" spots held by chairs for under 15 min whi | Perfectly happy. It seems to work. | No | No | No | No | No | This is areas is currently all residential and parking seems ample and plentiful for residents. There are less commercial businesses drawing people here and so the parking situation seems to sort itself out. | If areas become RPP zones- will folks still put out chairs and yell at others for moving them? Who enforces these things? | ||||
172 | Homeowner | I like that they want to fund mobility improvement projects. | People will park on the off streets to avoid paying. They are already crowded. Meter maids will work late? | It's too hard to find parking and there's nowhere to be dropped off which makes everything too far away. | 10 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 10 | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | I don't park there. wouldn't know. Plenty of parking when I go by so it looks like it's working | Yes | I don't have an opinion | No | No | No | businesses there have a lot of parking on Butler St. | Will the fines go into the fund? Will the permits be expensive for residents? Will those funds go into the pool too? | ||||||
173 | Business Owner | The extended hours from the meters and adding new meters won't particularly affect my business. My concern mostly lies with adding resident only parking throughout central Lawrenceville on the river side of butler st. | 7 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 6 | Adding parking for customers and employees | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | No | No | Yes | yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | We need to keep parking available for our customers and employees. If all of our below butler street parking is turned into resident only we will not be able to continue business. We need other parking solutions. new lots, a garage, a shuttle. Anything in | |||||||||
174 | Lawrenceville Business Employee | I like the idea that the money is going specifically back into the neighborhood. I like the idea of extending paid parking hours where there are already meters. I like that more crosswalks will be added and enforced, people drive entirely too fast on Butl | My main concern is finding free parking when I come to work. I park in two general areas, These are very convenient for our employees and if these areas were to be metered it would be hard to park close to work due to cost. It's about $9 per day to park i | My main mobility issue is the lack of crosswalks in some areas but I truthfully don't personally have issues with finding parking when I'm out to eat or anything down here on Butler. That's not to say there isn't an issue but I'm not as affected by it. An | 10 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 10 | Not sure / need more information | No | No | All of the employees at Sanctuary park on either | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | If this moves forward will there be any permit option for workers in the area to park for free/low cost? | |||||||
175 | Lawrenceville Business Employee | Traffic calming mechanisms - just last week someone ran the light at 57th and Butler & came up onto the curb, and took out a sign and a tree in front of our building. I also like the replacement of unused sidewalk space for vehicular parking. I'd love met | I don't have any concerns, I think it's a great plan | As noted above, traffic needs to be slowed down on this end of Butler. It's dangerous how quickly cars are coming off of the 62nd Street Bridge down into this corridor if the lights are green and they aren't forced to slow. | 5 | 5 | 10 | 8 | 3 | 1 | It would be amazing to partner with businesses and artists if you do bike infrastructure / fixtures | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | No | Yes | ||||||||
176 | Homeowner | Mobility Improvements are definitely needed in Lawrenceville, especially along the Butler Street corridor. | Potentially more visitors parking along the residential streets. However, I don't think this is enough of a concern to not do the Mobility Enhancement District. | Cars go too fast along Butler Street for me to feel comfortable biking on it. Also, crossing Butler Street as a pedestrian can be difficult due to drivers going too fast and not looking for pedestrians. In addition, crossing Plummer Street near Butler Str | 10 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 10 | 1 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Upper Lawrenceville probably needs the parking permits less than Lower and Central Lawrenceville, but I think it would still help all Lawrenceville residents. | |||||||
177 | Business Owner | I can appreciate any efforts to improve an area. | There are already too many issues with parking, and I am truly concerned that this will simply cause more. If people already don't want to come to Lawrenceville because there is nowhere to park, this is going to aggravate the situation. In the long run, | Parking & Heavy Traffic | 5 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 8 | Create parking lots | No | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | In fairness, I don't live in Lawrenceville and can't answer questions about RPP; but can tell you that I hate having RPP in my neighborhood. | |||||||
178 | Homeowner;Business Owner | Nothing | 1. In Upper Lville, several homes are on Butler Street. These people need to be able to park there for free. 2. Because of inflation and gentrification, many people are already pinched financially. Putting more costs on the home owners and renters so tha | No | No | No | No | No | I don't have an opinion | No | No | No | No | You're calling this enhancement, but it is an inconvenience for many. I understand the business owners need foot traffic, but that is not the responsibility of the residents. My responsibility to these businesses is to support them by spending money at th | ||||||||||||||||
179 | Homeowner | Good | Need more permit parking for residents | Not enough street parking for my street | 7 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | Not sure / need more information | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||||||||||||||||
180 | Renter | Meter collection in the evening makes sense as those are the most in-demand hours | 10 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 9 | 4 | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | No | ||||||||||||||||
181 | Family caregiver for Lawrenceville resident | The idea of collecting parking fees that can be reinvested into the neighborhood and enforcement when it makes the most sense | Family will have to pay to visit my father and parking will still be an issue | Parking near my father's home. He has very limited mobility, so walking a block is not possible | 7 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 4 | Bike lanes on busy streets are part of the problem as the cyclists do not follow traffic laws and they are the ones who do not leave adequate space between them and vehicles on the street. The lanes need to be on secondary streets or along the river. Bu | Yes | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | This will be a significant change for residents. What is the data on how well the permit parking works for freeing up parking for residents? | Can a resident get a permit if they do not have a car? How does that work. How many visitors permits are you allowed and how often? | How are handicap parking spaces considered in this proposal? | ||||||||||||
182 | Homeowner | I love the idea that this could help to implement the streetscape guidelines and create a better and safer pedestrian experience - especially in the 10th world. It could also fund a parking garage? | I do think that residents could consider pursuing rpp if we get meters in 10th ward specifically near some hot spot areas and during early evening hours if they are concerned about cars now parking within a block or two of butler near restaurants and bars | Pedestrian safety at intersections, would love more traffic calming on McCandless Ave and at McCandless and Carnegie. I have a tough time pushing a stroller on uneven sidewalks or into inaccessible businesses. Would love more benches along the business d | 10 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 5 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Thanks for all you do :) | |||||||
183 | Renter | Better capture of value from patrons coming from outside of the neighborhood, and new revenue streams to support necessary local infrastructure | Further limitations to accessible/affordable parking for neighborhood residents, especially renters, who rely on vehicles for daily commute | Limited parking proximate to my home, sidewalk congestion with bicycle and pedestrian traffic | 10 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 10 | 2 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No RPP available for tenants of my building, often difficult to secure parking proximate to building | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||||||
184 | Homeowner | The funding is smart, and would go toward improvements for the neighborhood. | As a resident, I'm sure that I'll benefit from expanded RPP and/or hybrid solutions. I am concerned about the businesses (and the school) nearby that will suffer from employees that are edged out of affordable parking as well as the consumers. I love livi | The turn from 38th on to Penn is really challenging as a driver, which in turn impacts pedestrians who are attempting to cross at that intersection. I had heard that there was a mirror posted at some point, but it was damaged. It's been several years sinc | 8 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 8 | Yes | Yes | Yes | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | ||||||||
185 | Homeowner | I think there is some need to increase the hours of parking enforcement on Butler St from 36th St up until around 51st. I think there is need for resident permits parking on Penn Ave and on the streets close to Butler St to leave space for individuals to | I don't think there is need for meter parking on Penn Avenue. I am concerned how that would affect the residential parking and also affect the few businesses that are on Penn Ave. it is more of a residential street and does not have the commercial busin | We need to make Lawrenceville easier to walk and to cross streets with adding more sidewalk bump outs on Butler Street and Penn Avenue. Make it easier to bike in Lawrenceville will more bike lanes. It would be great to extend the riverfront trail into t | 10 | 10 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 3 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||||||||
186 | Homeowner | I oppose the installation of parking meters on 39th St between Penn Ave and Butler St. Parking meters would create a significant inconvenience for family and friends that visit my house. Additionally, parking meters would discourage people from visiting | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | No | No | No | |||||||||||||||||||
187 | Homeowner;Landlord | I like the parts that actually deal with infrastructure mobility improvements, rather than just parking meters. | That it would allow rich people to "buy out" parking from residents. Take hybrid zoning, near a hospital. If a doctor decides that having a reserved parking spot is worth the 24/7 meter cost, they can essentially just have it, boxing out a poorer resident | Please connect the river trail under the 40th st bridge to the tree rivers heritage trail. It's so close- literally 10 blocks. Failing an actual riverfront connection, at least extend the neighborhood to where TRHT starts on 28th st. | 10 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 1) why are there trains and train tracks- I've followed them to the end and they lead literally no where. Repossess and rails-to-trails that land! 2) pedestrian light timing on the river side of bultler and 40th is terrible- extremely long wait. Would lov | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | I'm somewhat skeptical of the hybrid zones. It feels like a transaction that directly benefits visitors (as customers/consumers of parking) and local government (as purveyors of parking) but only indirectly benefits residents (via improvements that govern | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | I don't think central Lawrenceville (or any other section) should get special treatment. | Yes | Yes | Yes | What options do residents having a guest have under RPP? Like if yo mu temporarily need an extra pass so your cousin from out of town doesn't get a ticket while crashing on your couch? | I love Larryville, and your work generally! I also have SO MANY THOUGHTS (see above) that I am always happy to share. | |||
188 | Renter | I do not like the proposed meters going up Penn Ave. After 10 years living in this house I have noticed that even on busy days for the neighborhood the parking going up Penn avenue is still largely available as this area is predominantly residential. Thos | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
189 | Homeowner | Revenue for improvements in the neighborhood | Parking is often difficult near our home, especially evenings. | 10 | 10 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 8 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | I'm a little unclear about the hybrid zone on residential streets. Does this mean adding some meters off Butler St? | Thank you all SO MUCH for your care in educating, communicating, and gathering feedback. | |||||||||||||||
190 | Homeowner | I like that the funds that would be generated would go to directly improving aspects of mobility in the neighborhood. | Quite frankly (and selfishly), I feel like having to get a parking pass for my street (which currently doesn't have parking requirements nor issues with capacity) would just be more of a headache. But if it serves the greater good of the community I'm fin | Cars driving too fast on tight roadways (Butler and off Butler particularly). Still many sidewalks and lack of curb cuts are difficult for parents with strollers, those in wheel chairs or walking aids, and for children on scooters and bikes. I would love | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 5 | I would love to see more benches and seating areas along Butler -- there are surprisingly quite few of those. If there were more bumped curbs that could be a good place for them. Would like to see some flashing pedestrian crossing signage at certain place | Mostly yes! My main concern is around permit parking and how that affects guests that visit (frequently have family from out of town) | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | Yes | No | No | Yes | Personally I don't think that this is necessary where I live. And as expressed elsewhere, I worry about visitors who are staying and where they are supposed to park without a permit. It's quite inconvenient to get them temporary permits for short term vi | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion | I don't have an opinion |