| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| ECIP-1049 Keccak256 Consensus Tracker |
| | | | | | |
| Name | Role | For/Against/Neutral | Argument | Last Commented - Github | Last Commented - Discord | Twitter |
| saturn-network | participant | For | recognized ProgPoW as trojan horse, wants small ASIC makers to compete | Apr-19 | N/A | |
| drd34d | participant | Neutral | against ProgPoW, no comment on Keccak-256 | Jan-19 | N/A | |
| oberondelafay | participant | Against | against PoW altogether, thinks PoW is centralizing | Jan-19 | N/A | |
| p3c-bot / antsankov | author | For | see ECIP-1049 | Feb-21 | N/A | |
| xaoyaolee | participant | For | sees no problem with switching algos as needed | Jan-19 | N/A | |
| phyro | participant | Neutral | | Nov-19 | Feb 2022 | |
| stevanlohja | participant | For | Links to ETC Coop article for the Upgrade | Feb-22 | N/A | |
| pyskell | participant | Neutral | SHA-3 is more secure than etchash, but concerns for asic transistor limits | Jul-19 | N/A | |
| zmitton | participant | For | believes Keccak256 is best option for many current ETC challenges Excited when Keccak256 was decided | Nov-19 | Sep 2020 | |
| Harriklaw | participant | For | short term - pro MESS/Thanos, long term - Pro Keccak-256 | Apr-19 | N/A | |
| AndreaLanfranchi | participant | Neutral | Differentiates SHA3 from KEC, clarifies algo changes in ECIP is removing DAG | Nov-19 | N/A | |
| soc1c | participant | For | Believes SHA3 is the most effective PoW solution | Nov-19 | N/A | |
| BelfordZ | participant | Neutral | Contradicts himself. Against improving efficiency in github, then pro efficiency on twitter. | Nov-2019 | N/A | Nov 2020 |
| realcodywburns | participant | Neutral | wants to see proposal completed, also treasury dropped first | Sept 2020 | Feb 2022 | |
| mckie | participant | For | created a Keccak256 mining client | | May 2019 | |
| prestwich | participant | For | Keccak256 is superior algo to solve security, light client support, and cross chain comms | Nov 2019 | N/A | |
| YazzyYaz | participant | For | "I am in favor of this proposal to move to Keccak256" | Nov 2019 | N/A | Nov 2019 |
| Wolf-Linzhi | participant | Against | Against Keccak256, unless hybrid mining or "unless those miners turn against users" | Nov 2019 | Nov 2019 | |
| serialp | participant | For | Agrees, suggests considering multiple algos. | Nov 2019 | N/A | |
| Fox Protocol Mining | participant | For | pro Keccak-256 | | Dec-20 | |
| TheEnthusiasticAs | participant | For | Should have highest security standard. Higher algo standard = more attractive it will get. | Dec 2020 | N/A | |
| tzdybal | participant | Against | Wants Flyclient, likes Keccak256, but see move as risky. | Nov 2019 | N/A | |
| developerkevin | participant | Neutral | Keccak possible in future, but not now. | Nov 2019 | Jan 2022 | |
| snissn | participant | For | Suggests Keccak256 does not need double hashing as SHA256 did | Dec 2019 | N/A | |
| bobsummerill | Champion | For | For Keccak256 and wiling to champion the proposal | Feb 2022 | Jan 2022 | |
| jean-m-cyr | participant | For | wrote a Keccak256 mining client | Jul 2020 | N/A | |
| ghost | participant | For | clean and proven algo, distinguishing the chain from all others | Aug 2020 | N/A | |
| crazypool2019 | participant | Against | does not feel algo change is fair to miners | Aug 2020 | N/A | |
| gitr0n1n | ECIP Editor | Against | feels the proposal violates the ETC Core Principles | Feb 2022 | N/A | |
| ponchoetc | participant | For | supports, and also wants to see more miners support | Sept 2020 | N/A | |
| block-head | participant | For | contingent on keeping mixhash function in block header | Sept 2020 | N/A | |
| Spaceguide | participant | Against | asics = centralization | Sept 2020 | N/A | |
| x724 | participant | For | GPUs = weak security, FPGA's = decentralized, ASICs = will garner suppor | Sept 2020 | N/A | |
| sjococo | participant | Neutral | wait and see, then decide | Sept 2020 | N/A | |
| iquidus | participant | Neutral | requests clarification | Sept 2020 | N/A | |
| chrisfranko | participant | For | can provide opcode implementation on client | Nov 2020 | N/A | |
| q9f | participant | For | helping plan the ECIP through | Nov 2020 | Feb 2022 | |
| Jaska8 | participant | Against | concerns for GPU miners | April 2021 | N/A | |
| DirtyRusski | participant | For | disagrees with arguments against proposal | Apr 2021 | Dec 2021 | |
| VieYang | participant | For | adds that keccak256 is a solidity function and even could add sha256 | Jun 2021 | N/A | |
| wpwrak | participant | Against | concerned that better asics will be produced quickly | Aug 2021 | Community Call 2-15-22 | |
| stoweeo | participant | Against | invested 18k in a10 and wants to mine...ETC | Aug 2020 | N/A | |
| ghost2 | participant | For | prioritizes security over all else | Aug 2020 | N/A | |
| nicknick-tech | participant | Against | wants to keep mining GPUs | Aug 2020 | Aug2020 | |
| Dav-UVC | participant | For | supports the algo change, superior algo is best for long term health | Sept 2020 | N/A | |
| slashbinslashnoname | participant | Against | worried about 30% attacks... | Sept 2020 | N/A | |
| st0ckiz | participant | Against | for ProgPoW | Sept 2020 | N/A | |
| IstoraMandi | ECIP Editor | Neutral | supports the algo change with a laddered transition implemention | Nov 2019 | Community Call 2-15-22 | |
| DonaldMcIntyre | participant | For | supports SHA3 (Keccak256) as part of ETC's timeline for growth ETC will eventually need to move to sha3 | April 2021 | Feb 2022 | |
| sterky | participant | For | Likes the SHA3 (Keccak256) proposal | Jan 2021 | 2021 | |
| atoulme | ECIP Editor | For | besu implementation and mining testing on Astor Net | Aug 2021 | N/A | |
| rorshachrev | participant | For | likes the NIST approval of Keccak256 (SHA3) for ETC | | Nov 2017 | |
| marrych | participant | For | long term SHA3 (Keccak256) is most profitable for ETC | | Mar 2019 | |
| Danny Kane | participant | Against | we do not need an algo change | | Mar 2019 | |
| Red Panda Mining | participant | Against | is pro SHA3 (Keccak256), wants to support testnet changed stance to against in video | | Apr 2019 | |
| Pokemachamp00 | participant | For | very excited, wants to know when it starts | | May 2019 | |
| ETCpunk#2491 | participant | For | Keccak256 supports security, decentralization, and growth | | Feb 2022 | |
| WX2#7746 | participant | Neutral | Requesting information from, Neutral as far as support | | Aug 2020 | |
| a.s.#8019 | participant | For | I am for Sha3 Last active sha3 comment | | June 2021 | |
| ClassicCakes#8208 | participant | Neutral | Sha3 benefits sha3 users. Sha256 benefits sha256 users. ethash benefits ethashusers | | Sep 2019 | |
| g0st#3248 | participant | For | Sha3 algo change for ETC would in my view place ETC at the top (5 coins) | | Nov 2019 | |
| Foenix#4240 | participant | Neutral | Multiple post providing info on sha3 but no stance either way | | Sep 2020 | |
| Honey#1886 | participant | For | | | Jan 2020 | |
| Zerog#9751 | participant | For | I think if there are technical advantages, it makes sense to switch to sha3 Might as well move to a better algo | | Nov 2019 | |
| TJ#4776 | participant | Neutral | I've been clear, more research is needed | | Feb 2020 | |
| Jesse#4016 | participant | Against | Sha3 is dangerous Sha3 may kill etc | | Aug 2020 | |
| Vhdrlrband#9477 | participant | Against | Sha3 is the worse course | | Aug 2020 | |
| JackG#1775 | participant | For | I was against sha3, now I go for it | | Aug 2020 | |
| CryptoClutch#2861 | participant | For | Was for making any change at the time Had months to fix and something needs to change now | | Aug 2020 | |
| Cyrille#5918 | participant | Against | Sha3 will bring centralization | | Aug 2020 | |
| iogcharles#7422 | participant | For | Would fully support the move to sha3 | | Aug 2020 | |
| cReepas#3882 | participant | Against | Believe Sha3 is a joke and will destroy etc | | Aug 2020 | |
| Ozymandias#2082 | participant | Against | Wants etc to remain as is. Will move his rigs after the eth update | | Sept 2021 | |
| Buzzlite#3739 | participant | For | I support sha3, i agree with all what....] | | Jan 2022 | |
| Zois#2363 | participant | Against | Worried about GPU's going away. Like's gpus because of availability | | Aug 2020 | |
| Sp4rrow#7067 | participant | For | Looking forward to Sha3 | | Feb 2021 | |
| DeanMachine#9058 | participant | For | Wanted Sha3 before treasury | | Aug2020 | |
| MikO#8333 | participant | For | I hope ETC goes SHA3, ASICs are developed through open hardware, and our network becomes as secure as BTC | | Aug 2020 | |
| Alfonsoponcho#2576 | participant | Against | damn again dev put sha3 on the table? | | May 2021 | |
| Paul#9095 | participant | For | Sha3 is neeed in order to get over $30 | | Feb 2021 | |
| donsyang#0623 | participant | For | ETC needs a new engine SHA3 | | March 2021 | |
| Andrew T. #9424 | participant | For | I want sha3 | | Aug 2020 | |
| HeavenBoy#1402 | participant | Against | Changing the algorithm away from Ethash is like shooting yourself in the foot | | Aug 2020 | |
| dexaran#7457 | participant | Against | believes the sha3 proposal is pointless | | Aug 2020 | |
| Seventhehun#1496 | participant | For | Sha3 is good for etc | | Feb 2022 | |
| Dan't#1558 | participant | For | I'm 100% for Sha3 | | Aug 2020 | |
| anonwhale#5588 | participant | For | I feel it'd be better to get sha3/keccac256 on the road | | Aug 2020 | |
| SysMan#0247 | participant | Neutral | Does not state an opinion but offers reserach on sha3 being rare | | Aug 2020 | |
| Leagueshop.com#8059 | participant | For | I think sha3 is one of the best things that can happen to this network | | Aug 2020 | |
| Paul Atreides#1489 | participant | For | wants what is best for ETC | | Jan 2022 | |
| Brotherlal#3637 | participant | Neutral | Pro sha3 but does not believe 2022 is the year | | Feb 2022 | |
| Pistdov#4212 | participant | Against | believes the current mining ecosystem is thriving as is | | Feb 2022 | |
| justjin#0220 | participant | Neutral | Seems to be leaning towards sha3 but more information needed | | Jan 2022 | |
| topperharley#5124 | participant | Against | Lower the dag even more... worried about centralization with Asics | | May 2021 | |
| ijustwoncod#9236 | participant | Neutral | Ive seen a multitude of pros and cons for sha3 | | Jan 2022 | |
| Henry_epic#8257 | participant | For | ProSha3- Proposing hybrid chain as back up | | Feb 2022 | |
| Lampus#7095 | participant | For | ETW will be moving to sha3 ETC + SHA3= ROCKET SHIP | | Feb 2022 | |
| Big Lou#1672 | participant | For | Why would anyone be opposed to Sha3? like saying they would rather remain average | | Feb 2022 | |
| Sans_Rival#3995 | participant | Neutral | I am not fixed to any outcome Because I am diversified | | Aug 2021 | |
| LimDik#8691 | participant | For | I'm a whale, if there's no sha3 I'm selling my entire ETC position | | Aug 2021 | |
| IamLucario#6081 | participant | Against | Sha3 hasn't happened and never will. Dont need it | | Oct 2021 | |
| Nautical_illusions#0270 | participant | For | Why is the work on Sha3 stalled, we are losing time | | Dec 2021 | |
| brucetech#3512 | participant | For | Moving to sha3 makes a lot of sense. It is good to progress | | Jan 2022 | |
| micado990#5020 | participant | For | Would be great to see sha3 in etc but reality is its unlikely to happen | | Jan 2022 | |
| Kimi Sian-Yu Chen#0166 | participant | For | Time for Sha3 | | Jan 2022 | |
| OmniEdge#4303 | participant | Neutral | I am not for or against sha3 | | Feb 2022 | |
| Vlad_vx#0827 | participant | Against | ETC will die if centralized to a few sha3 stakeholder | | Jan 2022 | |
| ./Brad#0461 | participant | For | Let's do it, my FPGA is ready! | | March 2021 | |
| Haikugoo#1801 | participant | For | only upside for investors and miners, especially after SHA3 | | June 2021 | |
| d_a#5848 | participant | Against | Totally Against SHA3 | | Feb 2022 | |
| TheGuitarHero#3363 | participant | For | Believes SHA3 would be great for ETC | | May 2022 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| For | 63 | 69% | | | |
| Against | 28 | 31% | | | |
| Total | 91 | 100% | | | |
| Rough Consensus | Yes | | | | |