| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | AA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Concept identification | Concept definition | Context | Use case selection | eProcurement Phases selection | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ID | Concept | Definition | WG Approval Date | Github issue | Definition Source | Additional information | Related eForms BT | Choice | Justification | Phases | UC 1 | UC 2 | UC 3 | e-Notification (TED) | e-Access (e-Tendering) | e-Submission | e-Evaluation | e-Awarding | e-Request | e-Ordering | e-Fulfilment | e-Invoicing | e-Payment | |||
3 | C-112 | Abnormally Low Tender | A tender that is judged abnormally low based on technically, economically or legally unsound assumptions or practices. | WG approval 18/04/2018 | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/51 | YES | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | C-112 | Abnormally Low Tender | Tender deemed to have an unrealistically low value | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/51 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | C-112 | Abnormally Low Tender | A tender that is judged by the contracting authority as abnormally low based on technically, economically or legally unsound assumptions or practices. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/51 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | C-112 | Abnormally Low Tender | There are one or several bids with unexpected cheap prices. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/51 | Ontology proposal | An indicator to specify whether the tenders are abnormally low or not | BT-194 | NO | Having not found any clear enough definition, another has been proposed from other sources and from the knowledge of the team. | e-Evaluation; e-Awarding; | YES | YES | |||||||||||||||
7 | C-112 | Abnormally Low Tender | Tenders that appear abnormally low in relation to the works, supplies or services might be based on technically, economically or legally unsound assumptions or practices. Where the tenderer cannot provide a sufficient explanation, the contracting authority should be entitled to reject the tender. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/51 | DIRECTIVE 2014/24/EU | Whereas (103) | BT-194 | NO | |||||||||||||||||||
8 | C-112 | Abnormally Low Tender | Contracting authorities shall require economic operators to explain the price or costs proposed in the tender where tenders appear to be abnormally low in relation to the works, supplies or services. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/51 | DIRECTIVE 2014/24/EU | Article 69 | BT-194 | NO | |||||||||||||||||||
9 | C-112 | Abnormally Low Tender | Text describing the exclusion criterion for abnormally low tenders. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/51 | UBL | BT-194 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
10 | C-112 | Abnormally Low Tender | Text describing the exclusion criterion for abnormally low tenders. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/51 | ESPD | BT-194 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
11 | C-001 | Accelerated Procedure | A procurement procedure where the time limit for receipt of tenders can be reduced due to a state of urgency. | WG approval 18/04/2018 | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/50 | YES | |||||||||||||||||||||
12 | C-001 | Accelerated Procedure | A procurement procedure where the time limit for receipt or requests to partipate or tenders are reduced due to a state of urgency. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/50 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | C-001 | Accelerated Procedure | A procurement procedure where the time limit for receipt of tenders can be reduced due to a state of urgency or some administrative steps of the tendering procedure can be skipped due to a state of emergency. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/50 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | C-001 | Accelerated Procedure | A process where the time limit for receipt of tenders can be reduced due to a state of urgency. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/50 | Ontology proposal | Based on DIRECTIVE 2009/81/EC and DIRECTIVE 2014/24/EU It applies to open procedures, restricted procedures or competitive procedures with negotiation. | BT-106 | NO | When there are more than one Directive that refers to the BT in question, the combination of these Directives helps to get a better definition and more understandable | e-Notification; e-Access; e-Submission; e-Evaluation; e-Awarding; | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | ||||||||||||
15 | C-001 | Accelerated Procedure | A procedure where the time limit for receipt of requests to participate or tenders can be reduced due to a state of urgency. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/50 | Jáchym Hercher 20180207 | BT-106 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
16 | C-001 | Accelerated Procedure | Where a state of urgency duly substantiated by the contracting authority renders impracticable the time limit laid down in the second subparagraph of paragraph 1, it may fix a time limit which shall be not less than 15 days from the date on which the contract notice was sent. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/50 | DIRECTIVE 2014/24/EU | Article 27.3 | BT-106 | NO | |||||||||||||||||||
17 | C-001 | Accelerated Procedure | Restricted procedures and negotiated procedures with publication of a contract notice, where urgency renders impracticable the minimum time-limits. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/50 | DIRECTIVE 2009/81/EC | Article 33.7 | BT-106 | NO | |||||||||||||||||||
18 | C-141 | Added Category Buyer In Framework Agreement | Any additonal categories of purchasing agents participating in the framework agreement. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/76 | Ontology proposal | Based on eForms consultation | BT-111 | YES | Taking into account the BT, and the definition provided by eForms consultation for the same term, it has been considered that this is a good definition. | e-Notification; | YES | ||||||||||||||||
19 | C-141 | Added Category Buyer In Framework Agreement | Any additonal categories of buyers participating in the framework agreement and not mentioned in the buyer section of this notice: | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/76 | eForms consultation | BT-59, BT-300 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
20 | C-262 | Agent | Members of an evaluation committee (e.g..: jury members) that take into account the requirements, specifications and conditions of the tenders in order to evaluate them. | To be discussed further 14/11/2018 | To be discussed when addressing eEvaluation | YES | |||||||||||||||||||||
21 | C-218 | Agreement | A formal decision between two or more parties. | WG approval 13/07/2018 | YES | ||||||||||||||||||||||
22 | C-062 | Agreement Duration | Period during which an agreement is valid. | WG approval 13/07/2018 | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/72 | Can be expressed as a time period or with a start and end date An agreement could be for example a contract, a framework agreement or a dps. | YES | ||||||||||||||||||||
23 | C-062 | Agreement Duration | Interval between the award of the contract or closing of the framework agreement and its ending, including options and renewals. This duration may be expressed using two dates (start date and end date). | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/72 | Ontology proposal | Based on eForms consultation and the OP internal working. | BT-36 | NO | When there is more than one Source that refers to the BT in question, it is possible to get a better and/or complete definition by combining these sources. In that case, the information of the OP internal working has been complemented by the definition given in the eForms consultation. | e-Notification; e-Request; e-Ordering; | YES | YES | YES | ||||||||||||||
24 | C-062 | Agreement Duration | Duration since the award of the contract or closing of the framework agreement. In case of qualification systems, the duration indicates for how long the qualification system is open. This should include options and renewals. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/72 | eForms consultation | BT-36 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
25 | C-062 | Agreement Duration | For contracts and framework agreements, please give their duration since their signature. For dynamic purchasing systems and qualification systems, please give the duration since the publication of the notice. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/72 | eForms consultation | BT-36 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
26 | C-062 | Agreement Duration | Duration since the award of the contract or closing of the framework agreement. Duration of this period. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/72 | OP internal working | BT-36 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
27 | C-062 | Agreement Duration | The period during which this framework agreement applies. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/72 | UBL | BT-36 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
28 | C-062 | Agreement Duration | The period during which this contract is valid. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/72 | UBL | BT-36 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
29 | C-062 | Agreement Duration | Time-frame for delivery or provision of supplies, works or services and, as far as possible, duration of the contract. (a) In the case of a framework agreement, indication of the planned duration of the framework agreement, stating, where appropriate, the reasons for any duration exceeding four years; as far as possible, indication of value or order of magnitude and frequency of contracts to be awarded, number and, where appropriate, proposed maximum number of economic operators to participate. (b) In the case of a dynamic purchasing system, indication of the planned duration of that system; as far as possible, indication of value or order of magnitude and frequency of contracts to be awarded. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/72 | DIRECTIVE 2014/24/EU | ANNEX V PART C Information to be included in contract notices | BT-119 | NO | |||||||||||||||||||
30 | C-225 | Ancillary Purchasing Activities. | Provision of support to procuring entities including: (a) technical infrastructure enabling procuring entities to award public contracts or to conclude framework agreements for works, supplies or services; (b) advice on the conduct or design of procurement procedures; (c) preparation and management of procurement procedures on behalf and for the account of the procuring entity concerned; | WG approval 18/05/2018 | YES | ||||||||||||||||||||||
31 | C-003 | Award Criterion | Describes a rule or a condition to be taken into account for the award decision. | WG approval 27/04/2018 | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/78 | YES | |||||||||||||||||||||
32 | C-003 | Award Criterion | Specific means for the comparative assessment of tenders. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/78 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||||
33 | C-003 | Award Criterion | It describes a rule or a condition from the buyer that will be taken into account for the selection of the most economically advantageous tender, and which will be the basis for a comparative assessment of the quality of tenders. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/78 | Ontology proposal | Based on DIRECTIVE 2014/24/EU An awarding criterion can be objective, when it can be evaluated following a formula, or subjective, when human analysis is required. | BG-38, BT-539, BT-540, BT-541 | NO | It makes the definition of the Directive more comprehensible either because of its complexity, vocabulary, or semantics. | e-Notification; e-Evaluation; e-Awarding; | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | |||||||||||
34 | C-003 | Award Criterion | A concept to define a criterion from the contracting party that will be taken into account when awarding a contract. An awarding criterion can be objective, when it can be evaluated following a formula, or subjective, when human analysis is required. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/78 | OP internal working | BG-38, BT-539, BT-540, BT-541 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
35 | C-003 | Award Criterion | Contract award criteria are the basis for a comparative assessment of the quality of tenders. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/78 | DIRECTIVE 2014/24/EU | Whereas (104) | BG-38, BT-539, BT-540, BT-541 | NO | |||||||||||||||||||
36 | C-003 | Award Criterion | Without prejudice to national laws, regulations or administrative provisions concerning the price of certain supplies or the remuneration of certain services, contracting authorities shall base the award of public contracts on the most economically advantageous tender. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/78 | DIRECTIVE 2014/24/EU | Article 67 | BG-38, BT-539, BT-540, BT-541 | NO | |||||||||||||||||||
37 | C-003 | Award Criterion | Objective criteria which comply with the principle of equal treatment, non-discrimination and transparency and which ensure that tenders are assessed in conditions of effective competition so as to identify an overall economic advantage for the contracting authority or the contracting entity. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/78 | DIRECTIVE 2014/23/EU | Article 41 | BG-38, BT-539, BT-540, BT-541 | NO | |||||||||||||||||||
38 | C-003 | Award Criterion | Criteria for the procurement, using the award criteria code list, which describes the basis on which contract awards will be made. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/78 | OCDS ontology | http://standard.open-contracting.org/latest/en/schema/reference/#award http://standard.open-contracting.org/latest/en/schema/codelists/#award-criteria | BG-38, BT-539, BT-540, BT-541 | NO | |||||||||||||||||||
39 | C-003 | Award Criterion | Defines a criterion for awarding this tender. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/78 | UBL | BG-38, BT-539, BT-540, BT-541 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
40 | C-003 | Award Criterion | A class to define a criterion from the contracting party that will be taken into account when awarding a contract. An awarding criterion can be objective, when it can be evaluated following a formula, or subjective, when human analysis is required. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/78 | UBL | BG-38, BT-539, BT-540, BT-541 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
41 | C-003 | Award Criterion | A class to define the terms for awarding a contract. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/78 | ESPD | BG-38, BT-539, BT-540, BT-541 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
42 | C-003 | Award Criterion | Class describing criterioa that depend on a value judgement. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/78 | PPROC Ontology | http://contsem.unizar.es/def/sector-publico/PPROC Ontology#ObjectiveAwardCriterion | BG-38, BT-539, BT-540, BT-541 | NO | |||||||||||||||||||
43 | C-003 | Award Criterion | Class used to describe criteria that depend on a subjetive opinion. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/78 | PPROC Ontology | http://contsem.unizar.es/def/sector-publico/PPROC Ontology#SubjectiveAwardCriterion | BT-539 | NO | |||||||||||||||||||
44 | C-273 | Award Criterion Evaluation Dimension | The information needed to ponder award criteria dimensions. | The award is computed on the basis of different several dimensions such as quality, price and cost. One dimension, e.g. quality, provides the information necessary to measure how the overall quality criteria will be evaluated, as opposed to the individual quality criterion (which has its own weight and threshold). | YES | ||||||||||||||||||||||
45 | C-074 | Award Evaluation Method Type | The category of the criterion whether it be concerned with the quality of the offer or the financial offer. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/79 | Ontology proposal | BT-539 | YES | Having not found any clear enough definition, another has been proposed from other sources and from the knowledge of the team. | YES | YES | |||||||||||||||||
46 | C-074 | Award Evaluation Method Type | Category of Award Criteria | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/79 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||||
47 | C-074 | Award Evaluation Method Type | A code used to define this awarding criterion. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/79 | OP internal working | BT-539 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
48 | C-074 | Award Evaluation Method Type | A quality criterion is any non-price non-cost criterion. Please note that the European Commission maintains a detailed technical list of examples of green award criteria. This list is available in most EU languages at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/eu_gpp_criteria_en.htm. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/79 | eForms consultation | BT-539 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
49 | C-074 | Award Evaluation Method Type | Cost refers to any monetary value, except price, that the buyer wants to take into account, e.g. running costs, switching costs, disposal costs. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/79 | eForms consultation | BT-539 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
50 | C-074 | Award Evaluation Method Type | Price refers to the acquisition price. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/79 | eForms consultation | BT-128 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
51 | C-262 | Award Decision | Resolution of the buyer as to the result of the procurement procedure. | WG approval 14/11/2018 | The award decsion should identify what is awarded to who. The final result could be not awarded. In the case of variants a tenderer could have submitted more than 1 tender therefore the result has to identify the tender as well as the tenderer. The award decision can be made in favour of more than one tender for example in the case of framework contracts and lots. | YES | |||||||||||||||||||||
52 | C-261 | Award Result | To be discussed further | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
53 | C-110 | Awarded Contract | The decision on the winner of the procurement procedure has been taken. | To be discussed further | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/81 | Ontology proposal | An indicator to specify whether a contract is awarded or not | BT-142 | YES | Having not found any clear enough definition, another has been proposed from other sources and from the knowledge of the team. | e-Notification; e-Awarding; | YES | YES | YES | YES | ||||||||||||
54 | C-110 | Awarded Contract | Result of the procedure. | NO | |||||||||||||||||||||||
55 | C-110 | Awarded Contract | Points to the body agreement where a tender has been awarded. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/81 | PPROC Ontology | http://contsem.unizar.es/def/sector-publico/PPROC Ontology#awardAgreement | BT-142 | NO | |||||||||||||||||||
56 | C-110 | Awarded Contract | Property for awarded tender submitted by a bidder. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/81 | PPROC Ontology | http://purl.org/procurement/public-contracts#awardedTender | BT-142 | NO | |||||||||||||||||||
57 | C-110 | Awarded Contract | A class to describe the awarding of a tender in a tendering process. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/81 | UBL | BT-142 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
58 | C-110 | Awarded Contract | The awarded tendered project associated with this tender result. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/81 | UBL | BT-166 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
59 | C-168 | Awarded to Small or Medium Enterprise (SME) | The award decision is attributed to an organisation that is an SME (small or medium enterprise) at the time of submitting a tender. | WG approval 04/05/2018 | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/84 | YES | |||||||||||||||||||||
60 | C-168 | Awarded to Small or Medium Enterprise (SME) | The winner of the contract is a SME (small or medium enterprise). | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/84 | Ontology proposal | An indicator to specify whether the procurement procedure is awarded to a SME or not) | BT-165 | NO | Having not found any clear enough definition, another has been proposed from other sources and from the knowledge of the team. | e-Notification; e-Awarding; | YES | YES | |||||||||||||||
61 | C-168 | Awarded to Small or Medium Enterprise (SME) | awarded to SME winner. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/84 | OP internal working | BT-164 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
62 | C-078 | Bargain Purchase Value | The financial worth of a bargain purchase, taking advantage of a particularly advantageous opportunity available for a very short time at a price considerably lower than market prices. | WG approval 25/05/2018 | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/98 | Ontology proposal | Based on the DIRECTIVE 2014/25/EU | BT-164 | YES | It makes the definition of the Directive more comprehensible either because of its complexity, vocabulary, or semantics. | e-Notification; | YES | |||||||||||||||
63 | C-078 | Bargain Purchase Value | Price paid for bargain purchases. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/98 | OP internal working | BT-164 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
64 | C-078 | Bargain Purchase Value | (...) for bargain purchases, where it is possible to procure supplies by taking advantage of a particularly advantageous opportunity available for a very short time at a price considerably lower than normal market prices; | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/98 | DIRECTIVE 2014/25/EU | Article 50 (h) | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
65 | C-044 | Buyer | Organisation that manages the budget allocated for the procedure and pays for the items being procured. | WG approval 14/11/2018 | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/53 | YES | |||||||||||||||||||||
66 | C-044 | Buyer | Body that manages the budget allocated for the procedure and pays for the items being procured. It may be different from the procuring entity. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/53 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||||
67 | C-044 | Buyer | The party whose budget will be used to purchase the works, supplies or services. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/53 | Jáchym Hercher 20180207 | NO | |||||||||||||||||||||
68 | C-044 | Buyer | The buyer is the entity whose budget will be used to purchase the goods. This may be different from the procuring entity who may be specified in the tender data. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/53 | OCDS ontology | Voted WG 21/9/2017. http://standard.open-contracting.org/latest/en/schema/reference/#award | NO | Taking into account the BT, and the definition provided by OCDS ontology for the same term, it has been considered that this is a good definition. | e-Notification; e-Access; e-Submission; e-Evaluation; e-Awarding; e-Request; e-Ordering; e-Fulfiltment; e-Invoicing; e-Payment; | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | |||||
69 | C-044 | Buyer | The entity managing the procurement. This may be different from the buyer who pays for, or uses, the items being procured. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/53 | OCDS ontology | http://standard.open-contracting.org/latest/en/schema/reference/#organizationreference | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
70 | C-044 | Buyer | Body related to the contract. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/53 | PPROC Ontology | http://contsem.unizar.es/def/sector-publico/PPROC Ontology.html#ContractBodies | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
71 | C-044 | Buyer | Any authority of a State. A public authority is a type of public body, i.e. is a public body of a State apparatus, either at central and local level. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/53 | LOTED Ontology | LOTED ontology (http://loted.eu/ontology) | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
72 | C-044 | Buyer | The contracting authority or contracting entity who is buying supplies, services or public works using a tendering procedure as described in the applicable directive (Directives 2014/24/EU, 2014/25/EU). | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/53 | e-Sens | NO | |||||||||||||||||||||
73 | C-044 | Buyer | An entity which pursues one of the activities referred to in Annex II and award a concession for the pursuit of one of those activities, and which are one of the following: (a) State, regional or local authorities, bodies governed by public law or associations formed by one or more such authorities or one or more such bodies governed by public law; (b) public undertakings as defined in paragraph 4 of this Article; (c) entities other than those referred to in points (a) and (b) of this paragraph, but which operate on the basis of special or exclusive rights, granted for the exercise of one of the activities referred to in Annex II. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/53 | DIRECTIVE 2014/23/EU | Article 7 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
74 | C-044 | Buyer | Entities which: (a) are contracting authorities or public undertakings and which pursue one of the activities referred to in Articles 8 to 14; (b) when they are not contracting authorities or public undertakings, have as one of their activities any of the activities referred to in Articles 8 to 14, or any combination thereof and operate on the basis of special or exclusive rights granted by a competent authority of a Member State. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/53 | DIRECTIVE 2014/25/EU | Article 4 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
75 | C-044 | Buyer | A class representing the contracting authority or contracting entity who is buying supplies, services or public works using a tendering procedure as described in the applicable directive (Directives 2014/24/EU, 2014/25/EU). | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/53 | ESPD | Survey MS15/9/2017 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
76 | C-044 | Buyer | A contracting authority providing centralised purchasing activities and, possibly, ancillary purchasing activities. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/53 | DIRECTIVE 2014/24/EU | Whereas 16 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
77 | C-044 | Buyer | A role played by an entity operating in ordinary sectors in the context of any procurement competitive process. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/53 | LOTED Ontology | http://loted.eu/ontology | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
78 | C-044 | Buyer | State, regional or local authorities, bodies governed by public law or associations formed by one or more such authorities or one or more such bodies governed by public law. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/53 | DIRECTIVE 2014/24/EU | Article 2 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
79 | C-044 | Buyer | The contracting authority specifies the business entity which issues the contract. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/53 | OCDS ontology | https://github.com/opendatacz/public-contracts-ontology/blob/wiki/Cookbook_Contracting_authority.md | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
80 | C-044 | Buyer | The coordinates and identifiers relating to the organisation(s) that are procuring works, supplies and services. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/53 | Ontology proposal | BG-10 | NO | Having not found any clear enough definition, another has been proposed from other sources and from the knowledge of the team. | |||||||||||||||||||
81 | C-044 | Buyer | A concept to describe the buyer with the information about the contacting point and the address of this buyer. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/53 | OP internal working | NO | |||||||||||||||||||||
82 | C-044 | Buyer | a party that acquires, or agrees to acquire, ownership (in case of goods), or benefit or usage (in case of services), in exchange for money or other consideration under a contract of sale. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/53 | Financial Industry Business Ontology | NO | |||||||||||||||||||||
83 | C-044 | Buyer | It represents the organization. One organization maycomprise several sub-organizations and any organization may have one or moreorganizational units. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/53 | ISA CORE VOCABULARIES | NO | |||||||||||||||||||||
84 | C-044 | Buyer | Each of the parties (organizations or other participants) referenced in a release must be included in the parties section. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/53 | OCDS ontology | NO | |||||||||||||||||||||
85 | C-044 | Buyer | A class representing the contracting authority or contracting entity who is buying supplies, services or public works using a tendering procedure as described in the applicable directive (Directives 2014/24/EU, 2014/25/EU). | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/53 | UBL | BT-508 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
86 | C-028 | Buyer Profile | Website address where the buyer publishes information on its procurement procedures and general information. | WG approval 04/05/2018 | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/64 | YES | |||||||||||||||||||||
87 | C-028 | Buyer Profile | Website address where the buyer publishes information regarding procurement processes, such as procurement notices, contract award notices, prior information notices, etc. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/64 | Ontology proposal | BT-508 | NO | Having not found any clear enough definition, another has been proposed from other sources and from the knowledge of the team. | e-Notification; e-Access; | YES | YES | ||||||||||||||||
88 | C-028 | Buyer Profile | Internet address of the ‘buyer profile’ (URL). | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/64 | DIRECTIVE 2014/24/EU | ANNEX V PART A Information to be included in notices of the publication of a prior information notice on a buyer profile | BT-508 | NO | |||||||||||||||||||
89 | C-028 | Buyer Profile | The buyer profile is typically located on a web site where the contracting party publishes its procurement opportunities. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/64 | UBL | BT-508 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
90 | C-028 | Buyer Profile | Address of the buyer profile: (URL). | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/64 | eForms consultation | BT-08 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
91 | C-047 | Buyer Role | It identifies the function of the buyer in this procurement process. | Discussed 04/05/2018 to be discussed further | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/54 | Ontology proposal | Based on the OP internal working. Possible roles of the buyer: sole contractor; central purchasing body; capacity of the buyer to buy for others, on behalf of others or jointly with others, etc. | BT-08 | YES | Taking into account the BT, and the definition provided by the OP internal working for the same term, it has been considered that this is a good definition. | e-Notification; | YES | |||||||||||||||
92 | C-047 | Buyer Role | Capacity of the buyer to buy for others/on behal of others together with others. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/54 | OP internal working | BT-08 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
93 | C-047 | Buyer Role | The buyer is a central purchasing body: â—¯ yes â—¯ no | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/54 | eForms consultation | BT-08 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
94 | C-047 | Buyer Role | The buyer is a central purchasing body or acts on behalf of another or participates in a joint procurement or as no speciifed role. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/54 | eForms consultation | BT-08 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
95 | C-047 | Buyer Role | • If the buyer is acquiring goods or services intended for other buyers, no other buyers need to be specified in the notice. (2014/24/EU Art. 2(1) 14a and Art. 37(1) first subparagraph.) • If the buyer is awarding public contracts intended for other buyers, these buyers must be indicated in this section. • If the buyer is concluding a framework agreement or a dynamic purchasing system intended for other buyers, these buyers must be clearly indicated in this section or in the techniques section (...). In case of dynamic purchasing systems, other buyers can join the system later (...). This box should not be ticked if the procurement is not intended for other buyers. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/54 | eForms consultation | BT-62 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||
96 | C-079 | Calculation Method | Formula for obtaining values. | WG approval 25/05/2018 | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/55 | The possible values are monetary values, ranking scores, criterion weighting. | YES | ||||||||||||||||||||
97 | C-079 | Calculation Method | The technique used for determining the estimated cost of a concession. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/55 | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||||
98 | C-079 | Calculation Method | The technique used for determining the estimated cost of the concession. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/55 | eForms consultation | BT-62 | NO | Taking into account the BT, and the definition provided by the eForms consultation for the same term, it has been considered that this is a good definition. | e-Notification; | YES | |||||||||||||||||
99 | C-079 | Calculation Method | In accordance with the calculation method set out in the GPA, the determination of such values shall be based on the average daily values of those currencies corresponding to the applicable threshold expressed in euro over the 24 months terminating on 31 August preceding the revision with effect from 1 January. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/55 | DIRECTIVE 2014/23/EU | Article 9 (2) | BT-62 | NO | |||||||||||||||||||
100 | C-079 | Calculation Method | Method used for calculating the estimated value of the concession. | https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/55 | eForms consultation | NO | |||||||||||||||||||||