A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Value | Source | Notes | |||||
2 | Moral weights | |||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | Moral weights assigned to different benefits | |||||||
5 | Value assigned to averting the death of an individual under 5 from malaria | 116 | GW's analysis of moral weights for malaria | |||||
6 | Value assigned to averting the death of an individual 5 or older from malaria | 73 | GW's analysis of moral weights for malaria | |||||
7 | Value assigned to increasing ln(consumption) by one unit for one person for one year | 1.44 | GW's analysis of moral weights for malaria | |||||
8 | ||||||||
9 | Counterfactual value of other actors' spending | |||||||
10 | ||||||||
11 | Counterfactual value of government health spending | |||||||
12 | Estimated proportion of counterfactual government health spending spent on programs targeting people under age 5 | 45% | GiveWell counterfactual value of government funds calculation spreadsheet | These are rough, back-of-the-envelope calculations. As a simplifying modeling assumption, we assume that all health spending is on programs aimed at preventing mortality, rather than morbidity. | ||||
13 | Estimated cost per life saved for marginal government spending on health programs targeting people under age 5 | $12,254 | GiveWell counterfactual value of government funds calculation spreadsheet | |||||
14 | Estimated proportion of counterfactual government health spending spent on programs targeting people over age 5 | 55% | GiveWell counterfactual value of government funds calculation spreadsheet | |||||
15 | Estimated cost per life saved for marginal government spending on health programs targeting people over age 5 | $30,000 | GiveWell counterfactual value of government funds calculation spreadsheet | |||||
16 | Units of value generated per government health dollar spent on programs targeting people under age 5 | 0.0095 | Calculation | |||||
17 | Units of value generated per government health dollar spent on programs targeting people over age 5 | 0.0024 | Calculation | |||||
18 | Overall units of value generated per government health dollar spent | 0.0056 | Calculation | |||||
19 | ||||||||
20 | Counterfactual value of government education spending | |||||||
21 | Estimated proportion of counterfactual government education spending spent on primary education | 59% | GiveWell counterfactual value of government funds calculation spreadsheet | Estimates based on World Bank data for Uganda | ||||
22 | Estimated proportion of counterfactual government education spending spent on secondary education | 25% | GiveWell counterfactual value of government funds calculation spreadsheet | |||||
23 | Estimated proportion of counterfactual government education spending spent on tertiary education | 16% | GiveWell counterfactual value of government funds calculation spreadsheet | |||||
24 | Value generated by government spending on primary education in terms of increasing future consumption, relative to GiveDirectly | 100% | Guesstimate based on accumulated GiveWell knowledge. We recognize this parameter is highly uncertain. | |||||
25 | Value generated by government spending on secondary education in terms of increasing future consumption, relative to GiveDirectly | 70% | Guesstimate based on accumulated GiveWell knowledge. We recognize this parameter is highly uncertain. | |||||
26 | Value generated by government spending on tertiary education in terms of increasing future consumption, relative to GiveDirectly | 50% | Guesstimate based on accumulated GiveWell knowledge. We recognize this parameter is highly uncertain. | |||||
27 | Units of value generated per dollar donated to GiveDirectly's unconditional cash transfer program | 0.0034 | GiveWell's CEA for GiveDirectly's unconditional cash transfers | |||||
28 | Units of value generated per government education dollar spent | 0.0028 | Calculation | |||||
29 | ||||||||
30 | Counterfactual value of government social security spending | |||||||
31 | Estimated proportion of counterfactual government social security spending in the form of in-kind contributions to social security programs | 53% | GiveWell counterfactual value of government funds calculation spreadsheet | Estimates based on World Bank data for Uganda | ||||
32 | Estimated proportion of counterfactual government social security spending spent on social pension | 19% | GiveWell counterfactual value of government funds calculation spreadsheet | |||||
33 | Estimated proportion of counterfactual government social security spending spent on conditional cash transfers | 18% | GiveWell counterfactual value of government funds calculation spreadsheet | |||||
34 | Estimated proportion of counterfactual government social security spending spent on unconditional cash transfers | 9% | GiveWell counterfactual value of government funds calculation spreadsheet | |||||
35 | Value generated by in-kind government contributions to social security programs, relative to GiveDirectly | 70% | Guesstimate based on accumulated GiveWell knowledge. We recognize this parameter is highly uncertain. | |||||
36 | Value generated by government spending on social pension, relative to GiveDirectly | 70% | Guesstimate based on accumulated GiveWell knowledge. We recognize this parameter is highly uncertain. | |||||
37 | Value generated by government spending on conditional cash transfers, relative to GiveDirectly | 100% | Guesstimate based on accumulated GiveWell knowledge. We recognize this parameter is highly uncertain. | |||||
38 | Value generated by government spending on unconditional cash transfers, relative to GiveDirectly | 100% | Guesstimate based on accumulated GiveWell knowledge. We recognize this parameter is highly uncertain. | |||||
39 | Units of value generated per dollar donated to GiveDirectly's unconditional cash transfer program | 0.0034 | GiveWell's CEA for GiveDirectly's unconditional cash transfers | |||||
40 | Units of value generated per government social security dollar spent | 0.0026 | Calculation | |||||
41 | ||||||||
42 | Value of grantee spending (to use as reference points) | |||||||
43 | Units of value generated by AMF's spending on ITN distributions in DRC (before final adjustments) | 0.0404 | GW's CEA for long-lasting insecticide-treated net (LLIN) distributions | |||||
44 | Units of value generated by Helen Keller International's spending on VAS in Kenya (before final adjustments) | 0.0190 | GW's CEA for vitamin A supplementation (VAS) | |||||
45 | ||||||||
46 | Counterfactual value of spending by other actors | |||||||
47 | Counterfactual units of value generated by government spending on deworming | 0.0035 | Calculation | Weighted average of 25% health, 70% education, 5% social security | ||||
48 | Counterfactual units of value generated by government spending on malaria, VAS, and immunization programs | 0.0051 | Calculation | Weighted average of 80% health, 10% education, 10% social security | ||||
49 | Counterfactual units of value generated by donated deworming drug costs | 0.0040 | Calculation | 10% as good as AMF in DRC (before supplemental adjustments) | ||||
50 | Counterfactual units of value generated by philanthropic actors' spending on VAS and vitamin A capsule procurement (in countries where VAS is supported by a grant from Global Affairs Canada) | 0.0123 | Calculation | 50/50 weighted average of (a) our estimate of the value of delivering VAS in Kenya (before supplemental adjustments), and (b) our estimate of the value of domestic government health spending. | ||||
51 | Counterfactual units of value generated by philanthropic actors's spending on VAS and vitamin A capsule procurement (in other countries) | 0.0056 | Calculation | Assumed to be same as 100% government health spending | ||||
52 | Counterfactual units of value generated by Gavi spending | 0.0070 | US allocations to Gavi and Maternal and Child Health | Assumed to be the counterfactual value of other opportunities that Gavi donors (primarily high-income countries and private philanthropy) would fund | ||||
53 |