ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
GAD Checklists 2: For the Project Identification and Design Stages
2
3
Note: Put 'X' mark on appropriate box
4
Done?
Score for
Comments/
5
Element and items/question
(col.2) an item/ gender issues
6
 (col.1)No Partly Yes element identified
7
 (2a) (2b) (2c) (col.3) (col.4)
8
1.0 Involvement of women and men (max score: 2; for
0
9
each item, 1)
00.51
10
1.1 Participation of women and men in beneficiary
11
groups in the identification of the problem
12
(possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
13
1.2 Participation of women and men in beneficiary
14
groups in project design (possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
15
2.0 Collection of sex-disaggregated data and gender-
0
16
related information (possible scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)
17
3.0 Conduct of gender analysis and identification of
0
18
gender issues (max score: 2; for each item, 1)
19
3.1 Analysis of gender gaps and inequalities related to
20
gender roles, perspectives and needs, or access to
21
and control of resources (possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
22
3.2 Analysis of constraints and opportunities related
23
to women's and men's participation in the project
24
(possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
25
4.0 Gender equality goals, outcomes, and outputs
0
26
(possible scores:0, 1.0, 2.0)
27
Does the project have clearly stated gender
28
equality goals, objectives, outcomes or outputs?
29
5.0 Matching of strategies with gender issues
0
30
(possible scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)
31
Do the strategies and activities match the gender
32
issues and gender eqality goals identified?
33
6.0 Gender analysis of the likely impacts of the
0
34
project (max score: 2, for each item, 0.67)
35
6.1 Are women and girl chldren among the direct or
36
inderect beneficiaries? (possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)
37
6.2 Has the project considered its long-term
38
impact on women's socioeconomic status and
39
Empowerment? (possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)
40
6.3 Has the project included strategies for avoiding or
41
minimizing negative impacts on women's status
42
and welfare? (possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.66)
43
7.0 Monitoring targets and indicators (possible
0
44
scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)
45
Does the project include gender equality targets
46
and indicators to measure gender equality
47
outputs and outcomes?
48
8.0 Sex-disaggregated database requirements (possible
0
49
scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)
50
Does the project M&E system require the
51
collection of sex-disaggregated data?
52
9.0 Resources (max score: 2; for each item, 1)
0
53
9.1 Is the budget allotted by the project sufficient
54
for gender equality promotion or integration?
55
OR, will the project tap counterpart funds from
56
LGUs/ partners for its GAD efforts? (possible
57
scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
58
9.2 Does the project have the expertise to promote
59
gender equality and women's empowerment?
60
OR, is the project committed to investing project
61
staff time in building capacities within the project
62
to integrate GAD or promote gender equality?
63
(possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
64
10.0 Relationship with the agency's GAD efforts
0
65
(max score: 2; for each item, 0.67)
66
10.1 Will the project build on or strengthen the
67
agency/ PCW/ government's commitment
68
to the empowerment of women?
69
(possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)
70
IF THE AGENCY HAS NO GAD PLAN: Will
71
the project help in formulating the implementing
72
agency's GAD plan?
73
10.2 Will the project build on the initiatives or actions
74
of other organization in the area? (possible
75
scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)
76
10.3 Does the project have an exit plan that will ensure
77
the sustainability of GAD efforts and benefits?
78
(possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)
79
TOTAL GAD SCORE FOR THE PROJECT IDENTIFICATION
0
80
AND DESIGN STAGES
81
82
83
84
Interpretation of the GAD score
85
86
0 - 3.9 GAD is invisible in the project (proposal is retured).
87
88
4.0 - 7.9 Proposed project has promising GAD prospects (proposal earns
89
a "conditional pass," pending identification of gender issues and
90
strategies and activities to address these and inclusion of the collection of
91
sex-disaggregated data in the monitoring and evaluation plan).
92
93
8.0 - 14.9 Proposed project is gender-sensitive (proposal passes the GAD test)
94
15.0 - 20.0 Proposed project is gender-responsive (proponent is commended).
95
96
97
98
99
100