Untitled spreadsheet

	A	B	C
1		Fortune & White (2006)	Nasir & Sahibuddin (2011)
2	Publications in total	63	43
3	Clear requirements and specifications	NA	26
4	Support from senior management	39	NA
5	Clear and realistic objectives	31	24
6	Strong/detailed plan kept up-to-date	29	NA
7	Up-to-date reporting	NA	12
8	Good/effective communication/feedback	27	20
9	User/client involvement	27	20
10	Skilled/suitably qualified/sufficient staff/team	20	18
11	Committed and motivated team	NA	9
12	Effective change/configuration management	19	10
13	Competent project manager	19	NA
14	Frozen/stable requirement	NA	17
15	Strong business case/sound basis for project	16	NA
16	Sufficient/well allocated resources	16	11
17	Good leadership	15	11
18	Proven/familiar technology/development methodology	14	15
19	Realistic schedule	14	23
20	Proper planning	NA	15
21	Risks addressed/assessed/managed	13	10
22	Project sponsor/champion/top mgmt support	12	22
23	Effective monitor/control	12	12
24	Adequate/realistic budget	11	NA
25	Organisational adaptation/structure	10	NA
26	Good performance by suppliers/contractors/consultants	10	4
27	Planned close down/review/acceptance of possible failure	9	NA
28	Good quality management	NA	9
29	Supporting tools and good infrastructure	NA	9
30	(End-user) training provision	7	2
31	Clear assignment of roles and responsibilities	NA	7
32	Political stability	6	NA
33	Correct choice/past experience of project management methodology/tools	6	23
34	Environmental influences	6	NA
35	Past experiences (learning from)	5	NA
36	Project size (large)/level of complexity (high)/ number of people/organisations involved (too many)/duration (over 3 years)	4	10
37	Different viewpoints	3	NA
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100