A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | AA | AB | AC | AD | AE | AF | AG | AH | AI | AJ | AK | AL | AM | AN | AO | AP | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | COORD_OP_CODE | COORD_OP_NAME | COORD_OP_TYPE | SOURCE_CRS_CODE | TARGET_CRS_CODE | COORD_TFM_VERSION | COORD_OP_VARIANT | AREA_OF_USE_CODE | COORD_OP_SCOPE | COORD_OP_ACCURACY | COORD_OP_METHOD_CODE | UOM_CODE_SOURCE_COORD_DIFF | UOM_CODE_TARGET_COORD_DIFF | REMARKS | Coordinate_Operation_INFORMATION_SOURCE | Coordinate_Operation_DATA_SOURCE | Coordinate_Operation_REVISION_DATE | Coordinate_Operation_CHANGE_ID | SHOW_OPERATION | Coordinate_Operation_DEPRECATED | PARAMETER_NAME | PARAMETER_VALUE | PARAM_VALUE_FILE_REF | UOM_CODE | DESCRIPTION | Coordinate_Operation Parameter_INFORMATION_SOURCE | Coordinate_Operation Parameter_DATA_SOURCE | Coordinate_Operation Parameter_REVISION_DATE | Coordinate_Operation Parameter_CHANGE_ID | Coordinate_Operation Parameter_DEPRECATED | SORT_ORDER | PARAM_SIGN_REVERSAL | |||||||||||
2 | 1571 | Amersfoort to ETRS89 (1) | transformation | 4258 | 4326 | NCG-Nld 2000 | 1 | 1172 | Accuracy 0.5m | 9607 | Dutch sources also quote an equivalent transformation with parameter values dX=+593.032 dY=+26.000 dZ=+478.741m, rX rY rZ and dS as this tfm. These values belong to a different transformation method and cannot be used with the Coordinate Frame method. | http://rdnap.kadaster.nl/rd/index.html Also Nederlandse Commissie voor Geodesie publication 30; 3rd edition 1997. Also with change of method and parameter units at EuroGeographics; http://crs.bkg.bund.de/crs-eu/ | OGP | 19/10/2000 | 1 | 1 | X-axis translation | 565,04 | 9001 | The difference between the X values of a point in the target and source coordinate reference systems. | EPSG guidance note number 7-2. | OGP | 21/07/2013 | 2013021 | 0 | 1 | Yes | ||||||||||||||||
3 | 1571 | Amersfoort to ETRS89 (1) | transformation | 4258 | 4326 | NCG-Nld 2000 | 1 | 1172 | Accuracy 0.5m | 9607 | Dutch sources also quote an equivalent transformation with parameter values dX=+593.032 dY=+26.000 dZ=+478.741m, rX rY rZ and dS as this tfm. These values belong to a different transformation method and cannot be used with the Coordinate Frame method. | http://rdnap.kadaster.nl/rd/index.html Also Nederlandse Commissie voor Geodesie publication 30; 3rd edition 1997. Also with change of method and parameter units at EuroGeographics; http://crs.bkg.bund.de/crs-eu/ | OGP | 19/10/2000 | 1 | 1 | Y-axis translation | 49,91 | 9001 | The difference between the Y values of a point in the target and source coordinate reference systems. | EPSG guidance note number 7-2. | OGP | 21/07/2013 | 2013021 | 0 | 2 | Yes | ||||||||||||||||
4 | 1571 | Amersfoort to ETRS89 (1) | transformation | 4258 | 4326 | NCG-Nld 2000 | 1 | 1172 | Accuracy 0.5m | 9607 | Dutch sources also quote an equivalent transformation with parameter values dX=+593.032 dY=+26.000 dZ=+478.741m, rX rY rZ and dS as this tfm. These values belong to a different transformation method and cannot be used with the Coordinate Frame method. | http://rdnap.kadaster.nl/rd/index.html Also Nederlandse Commissie voor Geodesie publication 30; 3rd edition 1997. Also with change of method and parameter units at EuroGeographics; http://crs.bkg.bund.de/crs-eu/ | OGP | 19/10/2000 | 1 | 1 | Z-axis translation | 465,84 | 9001 | The difference between the Z values of a point in the target and source coordinate reference systems. | EPSG guidance note number 7-2. | OGP | 21/07/2013 | 2013021 | 0 | 3 | Yes | ||||||||||||||||
5 | 1571 | Amersfoort to ETRS89 (1) | transformation | 4258 | 4326 | NCG-Nld 2000 | 1 | 1172 | Accuracy 0.5m | 9607 | Dutch sources also quote an equivalent transformation with parameter values dX=+593.032 dY=+26.000 dZ=+478.741m, rX rY rZ and dS as this tfm. These values belong to a different transformation method and cannot be used with the Coordinate Frame method. | http://rdnap.kadaster.nl/rd/index.html Also Nederlandse Commissie voor Geodesie publication 30; 3rd edition 1997. Also with change of method and parameter units at EuroGeographics; http://crs.bkg.bund.de/crs-eu/ | OGP | 19/10/2000 | 1 | 1 | X-axis rotation | 1,9848 | 9109 | The angular difference between the Y and Z axes directions of target and source coordinate reference systems. This is a rotation about the X axis as viewed from the origin looking along that axis. The particular method defines which direction is positive, and what is being rotated (point or axis). | EPSG guidance note number 7-2. | OGP | 21/07/2013 | 2013021 | 0 | 4 | Yes | ||||||||||||||||
6 | 1571 | Amersfoort to ETRS89 (1) | transformation | 4258 | 4326 | NCG-Nld 2000 | 1 | 1172 | Accuracy 0.5m | 9607 | Dutch sources also quote an equivalent transformation with parameter values dX=+593.032 dY=+26.000 dZ=+478.741m, rX rY rZ and dS as this tfm. These values belong to a different transformation method and cannot be used with the Coordinate Frame method. | http://rdnap.kadaster.nl/rd/index.html Also Nederlandse Commissie voor Geodesie publication 30; 3rd edition 1997. Also with change of method and parameter units at EuroGeographics; http://crs.bkg.bund.de/crs-eu/ | OGP | 19/10/2000 | 1 | 1 | Y-axis rotation | -1,7439 | 9109 | The angular difference between the X and Z axes directions of target and source coordinate reference systems. This is a rotation about theY axis as viewed from the origin looking along that axis. The particular method defines which direction is positive, and what is being rotated (point or axis). | EPSG guidance note number 7-2. | OGP | 21/07/2013 | 2013021 | 0 | 5 | Yes | ||||||||||||||||
7 | 1571 | Amersfoort to ETRS89 (1) | transformation | 4258 | 4326 | NCG-Nld 2000 | 1 | 1172 | Accuracy 0.5m | 9607 | Dutch sources also quote an equivalent transformation with parameter values dX=+593.032 dY=+26.000 dZ=+478.741m, rX rY rZ and dS as this tfm. These values belong to a different transformation method and cannot be used with the Coordinate Frame method. | http://rdnap.kadaster.nl/rd/index.html Also Nederlandse Commissie voor Geodesie publication 30; 3rd edition 1997. Also with change of method and parameter units at EuroGeographics; http://crs.bkg.bund.de/crs-eu/ | OGP | 19/10/2000 | 1 | 1 | Z-axis rotation | 9,0587 | 9109 | The angular difference between the X and Y axes directions of target and source coordinate reference systems. This is a rotation about the Z axis as viewed from the origin looking along that axis. The particular method defines which direction is positive, and what is being rotated (point or axis). | EPSG guidance note number 7-2. | OGP | 21/07/2013 | 2013021 | 0 | 6 | Yes | ||||||||||||||||
8 | 1571 | Amersfoort to ETRS89 (1) | transformation | 4258 | 4326 | NCG-Nld 2000 | 1 | 1172 | Accuracy 0.5m | 9607 | Dutch sources also quote an equivalent transformation with parameter values dX=+593.032 dY=+26.000 dZ=+478.741m, rX rY rZ and dS as this tfm. These values belong to a different transformation method and cannot be used with the Coordinate Frame method. | http://rdnap.kadaster.nl/rd/index.html Also Nederlandse Commissie voor Geodesie publication 30; 3rd edition 1997. Also with change of method and parameter units at EuroGeographics; http://crs.bkg.bund.de/crs-eu/ | OGP | 19/10/2000 | 1 | 1 | Scale difference | 4,0772 | 9202 | The scale difference increased by unity equals the ratio of an the length of an arbitrary distance between two points in target and source coordinate reference systems. This is usually averaged for the intersection area of the two coordinate reference systems. \n\nIf a distance of 100 km in the source coordinate reference system translates into a distance of 100.001 km in the target coordinate reference system, the scale difference is 1 ppm (the ratio being 1.000001). | EPSG guidance note number 7-2. | OGP | 21/07/2013 | 2013021 | 0 | 7 | Yes | ||||||||||||||||
9 | 1751 | Amersfoort to ETRS89 (1) | transformation | 4289 | 4258 | NCG-Nld 2000 | 1 | 1275 | Accuracy 0.5m | 0,5 | 9607 | Replaced by Amersfoort to ETRS89 (3) (tfm code 15739). Dutch sources also quote an equivalent transformation using the Molodenski-Badekas 10-parameter method (M-B) - see tfm code 1066. | http://www.rdnap.nl/ Also Nederlandse Commissie voor Geodesie publication 30; 3rd edition 1997. Also with change of method and parameter units at EuroGeographics; http://crs.bkg.bund.de/crs-eu/ | OGP | 22/03/2007 | 2005.080 2005.180 2005.460 2007.043 | 1 | 0 | X-axis translation | 565,04 | 9001 | The difference between the X values of a point in the target and source coordinate reference systems. | EPSG guidance note number 7-2. | OGP | 21/07/2013 | 2013021 | 0 | 1 | Yes | ||||||||||||||
10 | 1751 | Amersfoort to ETRS89 (1) | transformation | 4289 | 4258 | NCG-Nld 2000 | 1 | 1275 | Accuracy 0.5m | 0,5 | 9607 | Replaced by Amersfoort to ETRS89 (3) (tfm code 15739). Dutch sources also quote an equivalent transformation using the Molodenski-Badekas 10-parameter method (M-B) - see tfm code 1066. | http://www.rdnap.nl/ Also Nederlandse Commissie voor Geodesie publication 30; 3rd edition 1997. Also with change of method and parameter units at EuroGeographics; http://crs.bkg.bund.de/crs-eu/ | OGP | 22/03/2007 | 2005.080 2005.180 2005.460 2007.043 | 1 | 0 | Y-axis translation | 49,91 | 9001 | The difference between the Y values of a point in the target and source coordinate reference systems. | EPSG guidance note number 7-2. | OGP | 21/07/2013 | 2013021 | 0 | 2 | Yes | ||||||||||||||
11 | 1751 | Amersfoort to ETRS89 (1) | transformation | 4289 | 4258 | NCG-Nld 2000 | 1 | 1275 | Accuracy 0.5m | 0,5 | 9607 | Replaced by Amersfoort to ETRS89 (3) (tfm code 15739). Dutch sources also quote an equivalent transformation using the Molodenski-Badekas 10-parameter method (M-B) - see tfm code 1066. | http://www.rdnap.nl/ Also Nederlandse Commissie voor Geodesie publication 30; 3rd edition 1997. Also with change of method and parameter units at EuroGeographics; http://crs.bkg.bund.de/crs-eu/ | OGP | 22/03/2007 | 2005.080 2005.180 2005.460 2007.043 | 1 | 0 | Z-axis translation | 465,84 | 9001 | The difference between the Z values of a point in the target and source coordinate reference systems. | EPSG guidance note number 7-2. | OGP | 21/07/2013 | 2013021 | 0 | 3 | Yes | ||||||||||||||
12 | 1751 | Amersfoort to ETRS89 (1) | transformation | 4289 | 4258 | NCG-Nld 2000 | 1 | 1275 | Accuracy 0.5m | 0,5 | 9607 | Replaced by Amersfoort to ETRS89 (3) (tfm code 15739). Dutch sources also quote an equivalent transformation using the Molodenski-Badekas 10-parameter method (M-B) - see tfm code 1066. | http://www.rdnap.nl/ Also Nederlandse Commissie voor Geodesie publication 30; 3rd edition 1997. Also with change of method and parameter units at EuroGeographics; http://crs.bkg.bund.de/crs-eu/ | OGP | 22/03/2007 | 2005.080 2005.180 2005.460 2007.043 | 1 | 0 | X-axis rotation | 1,9848 | 9109 | The angular difference between the Y and Z axes directions of target and source coordinate reference systems. This is a rotation about the X axis as viewed from the origin looking along that axis. The particular method defines which direction is positive, and what is being rotated (point or axis). | EPSG guidance note number 7-2. | OGP | 21/07/2013 | 2013021 | 0 | 4 | Yes | ||||||||||||||
13 | 1751 | Amersfoort to ETRS89 (1) | transformation | 4289 | 4258 | NCG-Nld 2000 | 1 | 1275 | Accuracy 0.5m | 0,5 | 9607 | Replaced by Amersfoort to ETRS89 (3) (tfm code 15739). Dutch sources also quote an equivalent transformation using the Molodenski-Badekas 10-parameter method (M-B) - see tfm code 1066. | http://www.rdnap.nl/ Also Nederlandse Commissie voor Geodesie publication 30; 3rd edition 1997. Also with change of method and parameter units at EuroGeographics; http://crs.bkg.bund.de/crs-eu/ | OGP | 22/03/2007 | 2005.080 2005.180 2005.460 2007.043 | 1 | 0 | Y-axis rotation | -1,7439 | 9109 | The angular difference between the X and Z axes directions of target and source coordinate reference systems. This is a rotation about theY axis as viewed from the origin looking along that axis. The particular method defines which direction is positive, and what is being rotated (point or axis). | EPSG guidance note number 7-2. | OGP | 21/07/2013 | 2013021 | 0 | 5 | Yes | ||||||||||||||
14 | 1751 | Amersfoort to ETRS89 (1) | transformation | 4289 | 4258 | NCG-Nld 2000 | 1 | 1275 | Accuracy 0.5m | 0,5 | 9607 | Replaced by Amersfoort to ETRS89 (3) (tfm code 15739). Dutch sources also quote an equivalent transformation using the Molodenski-Badekas 10-parameter method (M-B) - see tfm code 1066. | http://www.rdnap.nl/ Also Nederlandse Commissie voor Geodesie publication 30; 3rd edition 1997. Also with change of method and parameter units at EuroGeographics; http://crs.bkg.bund.de/crs-eu/ | OGP | 22/03/2007 | 2005.080 2005.180 2005.460 2007.043 | 1 | 0 | Z-axis rotation | 9,0587 | 9109 | The angular difference between the X and Y axes directions of target and source coordinate reference systems. This is a rotation about the Z axis as viewed from the origin looking along that axis. The particular method defines which direction is positive, and what is being rotated (point or axis). | EPSG guidance note number 7-2. | OGP | 21/07/2013 | 2013021 | 0 | 6 | Yes | ||||||||||||||
15 | 1751 | Amersfoort to ETRS89 (1) | transformation | 4289 | 4258 | NCG-Nld 2000 | 1 | 1275 | Accuracy 0.5m | 0,5 | 9607 | Replaced by Amersfoort to ETRS89 (3) (tfm code 15739). Dutch sources also quote an equivalent transformation using the Molodenski-Badekas 10-parameter method (M-B) - see tfm code 1066. | http://www.rdnap.nl/ Also Nederlandse Commissie voor Geodesie publication 30; 3rd edition 1997. Also with change of method and parameter units at EuroGeographics; http://crs.bkg.bund.de/crs-eu/ | OGP | 22/03/2007 | 2005.080 2005.180 2005.460 2007.043 | 1 | 0 | Scale difference | 4,0772 | 9202 | The scale difference increased by unity equals the ratio of an the length of an arbitrary distance between two points in target and source coordinate reference systems. This is usually averaged for the intersection area of the two coordinate reference systems. \n\nIf a distance of 100 km in the source coordinate reference system translates into a distance of 100.001 km in the target coordinate reference system, the scale difference is 1 ppm (the ratio being 1.000001). | EPSG guidance note number 7-2. | OGP | 21/07/2013 | 2013021 | 0 | 7 | Yes | ||||||||||||||
16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | Deprecated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20 |