A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | School and District or Organization | Which CESA are you in? (if you know, 1-12) | Are your professional learning needs being met in science? | From where do you receive professional learning? (WSST, your school/ district, online or in-person courses, online communities, colleagues, DPI, other…) | What further professional learning would you like? | How much time is allotted for science in the grades you teach (or administer)? | Is there a clear, consistent scope and sequence for what is taught in science at your school (or district)? | If you have a clear scope and sequence, do teachers consistently follow it? | Grades K-5 (if you know for your district) - Which instructional materials are used? Select or list all that apply. | Grades 6-8 (if you know for your district) - Which instructional materials are used? Select or list all that apply. | Grades 9-12 (if you know for your district) - Which instructional materials are used? List others at that button and select all that apply. | Is your school looking for new instructional materials? Answer yes/no and explain why. | What has your school or district worked on in relation to implementation of the new Wisconsin Science Standards (NGSS)? Select all that apply. | What are your next implementation steps? | Are students taken out of science for special services, like interventions, special education, or other supports? | (If you know) What is the typical high school course sequence and how many students are in that sequence? [Bio, chem, physics] | (If you know) What is the typical high school course sequence and how many students are in that sequence? [Bio, chem, and various third options] | (If you know) What is the typical high school course sequence and how many students are in that sequence? [Physical science, bio, chem] | (If you know) What is the typical high school course sequence and how many students are in that sequence? [Physical science, bio, and various third options] | (As relevant) If there is a different high school course sequence, what is it and how often is it used? | What, if anything, does your high school do to make sure that students, particularly underrepresented students, are not placed into particular science courses or sequences? (or answer N/A). | Does your school or district have an equity initiative? Answer yes/no and provide a brief description. | Does your school have a STEM program? Answer yes/no, and if yes, is it connected to science learning or separate? | Does your school have a maker space, FabLab, or similar space? Answer yes/no, and if yes, is it connected to science learning or separate? | Does your school use standards-based grading at your grade(s)? Answer yes/no, and if yes, please list the categories (a link to a reference document or website would be ideal for this answer). | |
2 | Milwaukee Public Schools | 1 | No | I am pretty much left on my own to beg to attend PD and other learning opportunities | How to support science when the state and district do not see it as a priority, yet still expect me to answer for test data and failure rates | The district does not enforce suggested minutes in grades K-5, barely does in 6-8 and will not allow any specific courses to be required in high school | Yes | No | HMH Science Dimensions | HMH - Houghton Mifflin Harcourt | PLTW - Project Lead the Way, STEMscopes, McGraw Hill and a few other older resources | We just adopted everything except for Physics and Environmental science so we will be looking at those in a couple of years in theory | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Brought in more student sensemaking of phenomena, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations | This year we are focused on designing and implementing investigations and CER and Science notebooks, we have not set the goal for next year yet. | Often | Few students | Some students | No students | No students | Schools can do whatever they want - there is no district enforced sequence of courses, only a suggested path | nothing - requiring biology was seen as gatekeeping and is not allowed | on paper, not in reality | Yes - it is just PLTW and separate from science | we have six innovation labs in teh district - they are currently separate from science but we are hoping to change that | on paper, rarely in reality | |
3 | Shorewood School District/ Shorewood Intermediate School | 1 | Yes | Networking with building-level colleagues, WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), NSTA - National Science Teaching Association | Coaching on improving 3D assessment/ design | 40-50 min daily | In some grades, but not others | Mostly | FOSS | Locally created lessons/units, IQWST, Mosa Mack | Locally created lessons/units, Following traditional textbook | Yes, middle school always looking to improve (and lots of staff turnover with new ideas) | Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Developed new standards-aligned units, Revised assessments | Getting new staff through a first year to design better units | Rarely | Most students | Some students | No students | No students | Got rid of freshman course- everyone now starts in Bio | Yes- currently working on ICS equity | PLTW, doesn't count as science | Yes at high school- separate from science | No, elementary only | ||
4 | Brookfield Christian School | 1 | Yes | School or district provided learning, Curriculum Trainers, PD Support, i.e. FOSS | 35 - 45 min every other day | Yes | Yes | FOSS | TCI Science Alive | No, we just concluded a curriculum review for science content. | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Support more student talk/dialogue | Further PD on student talk and dialogue | Rarely | Most students | Not at this time. | Yes, separate as part of technology class | Yes, connected to technology | No | ||||||||
5 | Whitnall High School | 1 | Yes | School or district provided learning, CESA, DPI - Department of Public Instruction | 40-50 min daily | Yes | Mostly | Locally created lessons/units, Open Education Resources (OER) such as ML-PBL, etc. | Locally created lessons/units, DiscoveryEd | Locally created lessons/units, Open Education Resources (OER) such as iHub, HHMI, etc. | No. | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Revised assessments, Developed rubrics based on the standards | Common Assessments, continued development of standards based units and instruction. | Rarely | Most students | We have multiple versions of our science classes to support various student levels and needs. | not that I know of. | no | not specific to science | yes-trying to. Grading rubrics were built around the SEP's. | ||||||
6 | Waukesha STEM Academy-Saratoga Campus at SDW | 1 | Yes | School or district provided learning, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups) | > 60 min daily | Yes | Yes | Locally created lessons/units, SEPUP | No | Revised assessments, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations, Developed rubrics based on the standards | We are fully implemented. | Never | Most students | Our academies have their own science sequences for engineering and health sciences. | I have no clue. | No. It was cancelled. No signage of any kind is allowed related to equity. | Yes. It is the science program at my school. | Yes. Separate. | Yes. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16r1Fb_yDQyuXO7WcpJgx0uGkr4WGsm7g_s5TK1lUaO4/edit#gid=0 | |||||||
7 | Greenfield School District | 1 | No | Networking with building-level colleagues, NSTA - National Science Teaching Association, Workshops or meetings from other non-profit partners (e.g. nature centers, community groups), Reading | More workshops choices with higher frequency | 40-50 min daily | No | FOSS | OpenSciEd, Amplify | Locally created lessons/units, Open Education Resources (OER) such as iHub, HHMI, etc., American Modeling Teachers Association (AMTA) | Waiting for OpenSciEd at the HS level | Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Developed new standards-aligned units, Revised assessments, Brought in more student sensemaking of phenomena, Brought in more storylines where students make sense of phenomena over multiple units, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations, Developed rubrics based on the standards | Transition from Amplify to OpenSciEd at MS. Adopt new Bio curriculum at HS and explore opportunities for upgrades in other subjects. | Rarely | Most students | NA | Yes | Yes, PLTW | Yes, PLTW labs | Yes | ||||||
8 | University School of Milwaukee | 1 | Yes | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, CESA, WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), NSTA - National Science Teaching Association, Workshops or meetings from other non-profit partners (e.g. nature centers, community groups), DPI - Department of Public Instruction | Retreats for intensive discussion and formation of strong professional relationships | 35 - 45 min every other day | Yes | We adopted the NGSS DCIs and SEPs. Teachers are moving away from NSES pedagogy. | Locally created lessons/units, Mystery Science, NSTA | Locally created lessons/units, NSTA | Locally created lessons/units | Yes, we are always looking for innovative ideas and resources. | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Developed new standards-aligned units, Revised assessments, Brought in more student sensemaking of phenomena, Brought in more storylines where students make sense of phenomena over multiple units, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations, Developed rubrics based on the standards, Presentations and peer review of rudimentary scientific scholarship | Cross Cutting Concepts, Curriculum Development, Professional Development of faculty | Often | Most students | NA | Yes: Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion director | Yes, connected | Yes, connected | No | |||||
9 | St. Joseph Catholic Academy | 1 | Yes | School or district provided learning, WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), NSTA - National Science Teaching Association, Workshops or meetings from other non-profit partners (e.g. nature centers, community groups) | At this time, I am fully committed. | 40-50 min daily | No | Open Education Resources (OER) such as iHub, HHMI, etc., AP | No - funding is restricted. | Developed new standards-aligned units, Brought in more student sensemaking of phenomena, Brought in more storylines where students make sense of phenomena over multiple units, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations | Advance Standards-Based Assessment from MS to HS | Sometimes | Most students | N/A | N/A | STEM elective course | no | no | ||||||||
10 | Kettle Moraine Middle School | 1 | Yes | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers, NSTA - National Science Teaching Association, Workshops or meetings from other non-profit partners (e.g. nature centers, community groups), Summit Learning | Competency-based models in Science: how to write competencies & create continuua for assessment; Project-based learning in Science | 50-60 min daily | Yes | Mostly | Locally created lessons/units, Mystery Science, Open Education Resources (OER) such as ML-PBL, etc., Inspire Science | Locally created lessons/units, Summit Learning Curriculum | Locally created lessons/units, Open Education Resources (OER) such as iHub, HHMI, etc. | Not right now. Social studies is going through a curriculum review period right now. | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Developed new standards-aligned units, Revised assessments, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations, Developed rubrics based on the standards | Shift to a competency-based model and continuua for assessment aligned to NGSS. We are using models such as the Stanford SCALE cognitive skills rubric & Building 21 (PA) as a model. | Rarely | Most students | N/A | Not explicitly, and we are consistently focusing on growth for all learners. | Yes. It is integrated into science course work. | Yes. Design lab connected to learning. Makerspace is separate. | Yes. Scientific Inquiry, Evaluation and Communication, Interpretation of Data, Disciplinary Core Ideas. | |||||
11 | School District of Waukesha | 1 | Yes | Networking with building-level colleagues, WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), NSTA - National Science Teaching Association, Workshops or meetings from other non-profit partners (e.g. nature centers, community groups), DPI - Department of Public Instruction | Yes | Mostly | Locally created lessons/units | IQWST | Locally created lessons/units, Open Education Resources (OER) such as iHub, HHMI, etc. | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Developed new standards-aligned units, Revised assessments, Brought in more student sensemaking of phenomena, Brought in more storylines where students make sense of phenomena over multiple units, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations, Developed rubrics based on the standards | Sometimes | Most students | n/a | no | yes, but charter schools | yes, and building in LAUNCH into science k-5 | yes (based on science practices k-8) | |||||||||
12 | Lake Shore MS - Mequon-Thiensville School District | 1 | No | WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups) | It would be nice to work to get more of a K-8 or even K-12 continuum of learning for the district. | > 60 min daily | documented, but many NGSS topics and standards seem to have been skipped to focus on "priority standards" | Yes | Unsure | OpenSciEd, HMH - Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, PLTW - Project Lead the Way - Gateway | PLTW - Project Lead the Way, Unsure | Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations | Apparently work upcoming for K-5 work on science curriculum | Never | Most students | Unsure | Unsure | Yes - https://www.mtsd.k12.wi.us/district/commitments/equity | PLTW | No | At elementary, but not MS or HS (yet) | |||||
13 | Milwaukee Excellence Charter School | 1 | No | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues | > 60 min every other day | No | FOSS science kits and curriculum | Locally created lessons/units, Materials created by Achievement First | Yes. We do not have a comprehensive, guaranteed curriculum for any of our science courses currently. They either are teacher created or need to be heavily modified to meet our needs. | Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Revised assessments, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations | Complete assessment revision for all courses. Train science teachers in CCRS standards and NGSS instruction. | Sometimes | No students | No students | No students | No students | All students take the following sequence in High School: Bio, Physics, AP Chem. | All students take AP Chem junior year. | no | no | no | no | ||||
14 | Kenosha Unified School District | 1 | No | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers, NSTA - National Science Teaching Association | Summer intense workshops | 50-60 min daily | No | Not sure | Not sure. I am hearing HMH | HMH - Houghton Mifflin Harcourt | HMH | Teachers pick their own to fit topic and get it on their own filling in gaps in HMH and seeing need. | Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations, Working on common assessments for natively and summatively in PLT’s for big section offering courses. | Common formative assessments and CLose reading strategies appears this next PRofessional Development day. | Sometimes | Some students | Most students | Few students | Some students | Bio—>. Chem/Matter & Energy—>. Physics/Earth Sci/Adv Bio | Everyone is equal in choice and opportunity | Not sure | Middle school yes it is separate enrichment | PLTW. Separately with tech Ed in competition with science classes at high school | No, but has retesting, and appears to be heading that way (about 10 years behind). Yet, there are a lot of new people here in positions | |
15 | St. Anthony School - Milwaukee | 1 | No | Networking with building-level colleagues, WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), NSTA - National Science Teaching Association | Varies depending on grade span K-5 45-60 every other day, 6-12 50-60 daily | Yes but it can always be reviewed and improved | Mostly | Locally created lessons/units, Mystery Science | Locally created lessons/units, McGraw Hill iScience | Locally created lessons/units, Open Education Resources (OER) such as iHub, HHMI, etc. | Yes. We follow a 5-7 year review cycle and Science is currently in its year of research. We want to be able to provide students with more experiences that meet the Performance Expectations outlined in the NGSS. | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Developed new standards-aligned units, Revised assessments, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations, Developed rubrics based on the standards | We need to re-visit our alignment across grade spans. Individual grade and course work has been the focus thus far. | Never | Some students | Some students | No students | No students | N/A | Yes. Our network has spent the past 3 years offering professional development to our staff around equity related topics. | Yes. We offer afterschool STEM programing at our Middle School only | NO | Yes we use the Archidocese of Milwaukee standards. | |||
16 | Muskego High School - Muskego-Norway School District | 1 | Yes | Networking with building-level colleagues, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), Workshops or meetings from other non-profit partners (e.g. nature centers, community groups), AP Reading, UW-Oshkosh CAPP community, UW-Milwaukee SEPA group | I'm always learning within biology, many topics are of interest to me, especially new applications (ex. CRISPR, cancer treatments) | 50-60 min daily | Yes | Yes | FOSS | Locally created lessons/units, FOSS | Locally created lessons/units, Open Education Resources (OER) such as iHub, HHMI, etc., PLTW - Project Lead the Way | We are always looking for new instructional materials. However, I do not think that we are looking for a new entire suite of instructional materials (ex. a replacement for FOSS). | I am not certain what was done at the grade levels below high school level. At the high school, we reexamined our standards and materials. We developed standards of focus that incorporate many of the NGSS standards as well as the ACT standards. After that, our programming was examined to determine level of fit. Finally, adjustments were made to the instructional resources to better meet these new standards. | The 5-12 group is at the point in our PDSA cycle where we are beginning the planning for our next 7 year cycle this year. Adjustments to the curriculum will likely be made, but no decisions have been made yet. | Never at the high school. Sometimes they are taken out for intervention in the elementary and middle grades. | Some students | Some students | No students | No students | All students take biology. There are 2 sections of biology that are team-taught with a special education teacher. However, these sections have 1/2 regular ed students along with the students that are getting extra support. Chemistry is similar, where there is one team-taught section. Both of these courses teach exactly the same curriculum as the non-team taught classes, so any student in these classes is able to move on to any next-level science class. | No | Yes. It is connected to science. There is one PLTW class that can be taken for science credit. However, the majority of the PLTW classes are separate. | No | Standards based grading is not done at the high school. However, it is done in grades K-8. | ||
17 | Menomonee Falls | 1 | Yes | Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), NSTA - National Science Teaching Association, Online or in-person courses from higher ed | 90 min every other day | No | FOSS, PLTW - Project Lead the Way - Launch | Locally created lessons/units, DiscoveryEd, PLTW - Project Lead the Way - Gateway | Locally created lessons/units, PLTW - Project Lead the Way | 6-8 is looking | Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Brought in more student sensemaking of phenomena, Brought in more storylines where students make sense of phenomena over multiple units, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations | Sometimes | Some students | Some students | No students | No students | no sequence. Must take bio as grade 9 and then whatever other 2 desired | We discuss with level previous | not sure | Yes - is science | STEM Lab space | no | ||||
18 | Kenosha Unified School District | 1 | Yes | Networking with building-level colleagues, WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers, NSTA - National Science Teaching Association, Online or in-person courses from higher ed, Workshops or meetings from other non-profit partners (e.g. nature centers, community groups), DPI - Department of Public Instruction | Elementary twice a week for thirty minutes, MS daily for fifty minutes and HS daily for fifty minutes | Yes | sometimes and at what grade level | Amplify | HMH - Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, HMH is the adopted materials but a lot of teacher use local created | Locally created lessons/units, HMH | Yes, I am new to the role and the adoption is still a couple of years away but I cant sit back and watch this happen. Looking at open source for MS-HS. Elementary is going well | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations | Not really sure at this point since it is so far away. I am looking at open sourced materials. Maybe we can move forward faster | Sometimes | Some students | Most students | N/A | we are currently working on it | Kinda - we have a high school that has a stem program and one middle school as well | not really | only one ms/hs is standards based | |||||
19 | Greendale Middle School/Greendale schhol district | 1 | Yes | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues | 45-60 min every other day | Yes | Yes | Amplify | IQWST | Locally created lessons/units | yes, we are piloting SEPUP and OpenSciEd | Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials | piloting new curriculm | Rarely | Some students | Some students | all freshman start in bio | all classes are open to students | yes | no | yes; not connected but we can use it | no | ||||
20 | North Middle School Menomonee Falls | 1 | No | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers, NSTA - National Science Teaching Association | NGSS, CER work, technology integrations | 40-50 min daily | Yes | Yes | Nat Geo and McGraw Hill | IScience with McGraw Hill | Locally created lessons/units | Yes | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Developed new standards-aligned units, Revised assessments, Brought in more student sensemaking of phenomena, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations | Looking at new programs for 6-8 | Never | Some students | Some students | Bio first and then 2 choices | NA | Yes, major part of HS support system | Yes, we have a STEM academy | Yes in TEch Ed dept | No | |||
21 | Germantown High School | 1 | Yes | WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), NSTA - National Science Teaching Association | I would like more training in phenomenon-based teaching/learning. | 40-50 min daily | Yes at the high school. Not sure about grades K - 8 | Mostly | They use some Einstein Kits. | Not sure | Locally created lessons/units, Open Education Resources (OER) such as iHub, HHMI, etc., PLTW - Project Lead the Way, Illinois Storylines for Biology | Not that I am aware of. Personally, I am always looking for new ideas and ways to teach concepts. | Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Developed new standards-aligned units, Revised assessments, Brought in more storylines where students make sense of phenomena over multiple units, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations | My district is having us do UBD for each unit that we teach in science. | Never | Some students | Few students | Some students | Our freshman physical science course has changed to a blend of Chem, Physics and Earth Science. | Nothing that I am aware of. | Great question. I don't know. | Not to my knowledge | We have a wonderful tech ed dept. but I am not aware of any space like this in our district. | No | ||
22 | Kenosha Lutheran Academy, Kenosha, WELS Synod | 1 | Yes | School or district provided learning, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), NSTA - National Science Teaching Association, Online or in-person courses from higher ed, Workshops or meetings from other non-profit partners (e.g. nature centers, community groups) | 40-50 min daily | Yes | Yes | Locally created lessons/units, Mystery Science, PLTW - Project Lead the Way - Launch | Locally created lessons/units, PLTW - Project Lead the Way - Gateway | Locally created lessons/units, PLTW - Project Lead the Way | No. Not many teachers know how to implement more instructional materials than they already have. | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Support more student talk/dialogue, Developed rubrics based on the standards | Student led discussions and projects | Rarely | Most students | Bio, Chem, various third option. Used when students MAP scores are high enough to test out of physical science | N/A | I do not know | Sort of. We implement it when we can into units and topics. Mostly involved in the science classroom. | No. | No, I do not believe so. | |||||
23 | Eastbrook Academy | 1 | Yes | Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), Continuing Education Courses reimbursed under Title II | 40-50 min daily | Yes | Yes | Amplify, HMH | HMH - Houghton Mifflin Harcourt | HMH Science I believe | No, recently purchased new curriculum for all grades. | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials | In our second year of implementing new science curriculum. | Rarely | Most students | All students are on the same science sequence at our very small HS | Yes, we appointed a new DEI supplemental role coming into this school year and are working on discussing DEI matters with our staff through professional development. While diversity has always been one of the 4 pillars of our school, we are seeking to be more intentional about building the skills in our staff and students to navigate conversations constructively. | Yes, integrated within our existing science sources, involves a STEM week in partnership with MSOE each week. | No; limitation has been funding but it is something we have proposed. | |||||||
24 | Racine Lutheran High School | 1 | Yes | Networking with building-level colleagues, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), Online or in-person courses from higher ed, Workshops or meetings from other non-profit partners (e.g. nature centers, community groups) | Any available would be nice. | Three science credits are required for graduation. Students take Lab Science (physical science content) as freshmen, Biology as sophomores, and have a variety of options as Juniors and seniors. Normal class periods are approximately 50 minutes 3 times a week, block periods occur for each class once a week and are approximately 80 minutes. | Yes | Yes | Locally created lessons/units, Open Education Resources (OER) such as iHub, HHMI, etc. | The school specifically, no. Our teachers are always interested in new material that can be used to support classroom goals and standards. | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Developed new standards-aligned units, Revised assessments, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations | We will continue to assess the tools and techniques we are using to teach the standards. | Rarely | Most students | Physical science, and biology are required for freshmen and sophomores. Many of our students take Chemistry, but we also offer a variety of half credit electives that can be taken to complete the required three science credits for graduation. | We offer all of our classes to students based on common pre-requisites. | No. We work with all of our students to provide each of them with the support and help they need to be successful and offer them the classes the they are interested in taking. | No. Each of our classes incorporates aspects of STEM, and in addition we have shop classes and CAD that engage students in many STEM concepts and practices. | Yes, We have a small number of 3D printers used primarily for CAD classes. This is typically separate from our science classes. | No | ||||||
25 | Racine Unified | 1 | No | I have to seek professional learning for specific subjects in science | middle school chemistry | 40-50 min daily | They have selected 4 power standards that we are to teach but we don't assess the other standards that are taught in the process. I wouldn't say it is clear but the teachers that write curriculum over the summer did create a scope and sequence. | I think most of our teachers see we only assess on 4 standards so they glaze through things but don't necessarily follow it. | Mystery Science | TCI | no we just adopted TCI 3 years ago | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Developed new standards-aligned units, Developed rubrics based on the standards | I have no idea they don't really ask the teachers what we need | Sometimes | Most students | N/A | yes our entire district's year long PD is based on equity. | no | no | yes, Practice, formative and summative | ||||||
26 | St. Mary Menomonee Falls | 1 | No | Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), NSTA - National Science Teaching Association | More collaboration in best practices of teaching in an NGSS/3 dimensional classroom | 40-50 min daily | One exists but no time is allowed to discuss with elementary science teachers | Mostly | Locally created lessons/units, Mystery Science | Locally created lessons/units, OpenSciEd, Amplify | No, not until our Amplify contract is up in the next few years. | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Revised assessments, Brought in more student sensemaking of phenomena, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations | I wish I could collaborate with other middle school science teachers on maintaining best practices (i.e. - so much disagreement on should certain topics still be taught in middle school like Newton's Laws or mitosis/meiosis, etc.) | Never | Most students | N/A | Unsure | No | No | Yes, we use the science and engineering practices. | ||||||
27 | Hamilton School District | 1 | Yes | School or district provided learning, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), NSTA - National Science Teaching Association, Workshops or meetings from other non-profit partners (e.g. nature centers, community groups), Jason Crean and Kristin Rademaker (All Species Consulting) - NGSS Storylining | More on standards-based NGSS assessment practices | Elementary - 30-40 minutes 4x per week is the goal that we are switching to, 5-8th = 60 minutes per day or 96 min every other day, high school 83 min semester blocks | Yes | We are still in the process of consistent implementation. We are strongest at the lower grades and working on more alignment and consistency at the upper grades | Amplify, Mystery Science, TCI - Science Alive (K-2) | Locally created lessons/units, Amplify, SEPUP, Gizmos; Amplify Grade 6 only | Locally created lessons/units, Open Education Resources (OER) such as iHub, HHMI, etc. | no | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Developed new standards-aligned units, Revised assessments, Brought in more student sensemaking of phenomena, Brought in more storylines where students make sense of phenomena over multiple units, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations, Developed rubrics based on the standards | Consistent feedback and alignment to standards and rubrics; storylining and rubric usage at the high school level, implementation walk-throughs for program evaluation | Sometimes | Most students | not enough | yes, we have just begun and contracted with AWSA to support this work | Yes, separate | Our intermediate and middle schools do | yes at K-6 (we've prioritized 2-4 SEPs and also have categories for Content Understanding (DCIs). The CCCs are incorporated into our rubrics for both. | |||||
28 | Franklin Public Schools | 1 | Yes | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, CESA, NSTA - National Science Teaching Association, DPI - Department of Public Instruction, College Board | We're delving deeper into all teachers better understanding the three dimensions, particularly science practices and crosscutting concepts and what the progression really looks like. | I'm a curriculum coordinator - amount of science varies by grade level | Yes | Yes | PLTW - Project Lead the Way - Launch | Locally created lessons/units, OpenSciEd, PLTW - Project Lead the Way - Gateway | Locally created lessons/units, Pre-AP from the College Board | We have a few units to finalize with our multi-year implementation work, but we know where we're getting the materials. | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Developed new standards-aligned units, Revised assessments, Brought in more student sensemaking of phenomena, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations, Developed rubrics based on the standards | Continue to implement remaining new units; continue to improve instruction based on evidence-based strategies, deeply understand three dimensions of science for particular grade levels | Never | Most students | We have leveled up at the high school level and all students are enrolled in Pre-AP Biology in 9th grade and Pre-AP Chemistry in 10th grade. | Yes. We have values and equity is one of them. | We don't have something labeled "STEM program" but our high school students on average take FAR more than 3 credits of science and we have a strong biomedical career pathway and extensive engineering embedded in our science education. | Yes. It's a separate space, not connected to a science learning space. | Yes at K-8 and classes are graded based on standards converted to a single grade at 9-12. All are based on the science practices. | |||||
29 | School District of New Berlin | 1 | Yes | self | 50-60 min daily | Yes | Yes | Locally created lessons/units, Open Education Resources (OER) such as iHub, HHMI, etc., PLTW - Project Lead the Way | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials | Rarely | Most students | yes; separate | yes | |||||||||||||
30 | 1 | No | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers, NSTA - National Science Teaching Association, Online or in-person courses from higher ed | 50-60 min daily | It's in progress | Mostly | Locally created lessons/units | No- resource adoption was last year | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials | Rarely | Most students | Nothing | Yes- we have equity non-negotiables and work incorporate equity into instruction. We've have several days of PD dedicated to it. However, having said that no major changes have happened | yes- it is a club/team | no | no | ||||||||||
31 | Genesee Lake School | 1 | No | Networking with building-level colleagues, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), DPI - Department of Public Instruction | Other resources that are out there to support special ed students, especially students with significant learning needs. | 30 min or less every other day | No | Mostly | Locally created lessons/units, Mystery Science, FOSS, Scholastic magazines | Locally created lessons/units, Scholastic magazines | Locally created lessons/units, McGraw Hill Biology | Not at the moment, but this is an area that will be explored sometime in the future. | Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations | We have a company and school curriculum committee who will be looking at a timeline to adopt new science materials. | All of our students are in self-contained classrooms. | Most students | N/A | N/A | No | Yes- our library media specialist teaches STEM classes using standard supported materials. | Not yet. Looking into it. Would be connected to STEM. | No- we do not give letter grades at our school. We use a rubric to measure progress. | ||||
32 | Siena Catholic Schools of Racine | 1 | No | School or district provided learning | Our teachers need some professional development on integrating STEM within their curriculum. Would love to have you sometime if you are traveling. | I'd have to verify but I believe 40-50 minutes daily | we are working on that :) | see previous response | PLTW - Project Lead the Way - Launch, we had teachers trained in PLTW but they left... | PLTW - Project Lead the Way - Gateway, we had teachers trained in PLTW but they left... | PLTW - Project Lead the Way | Yes! Free is best but we might have some money. | we need to work on this. | Right now our focus has been on math but science will be next. If I had help we could get there faster. | Sometimes | Most students | Yes - too detailed to get into right now | Guidance works with that in scheduling with students | no | better at the high school but we need to build our K-8's | our high school does, yes and it is connected | we are transitioning to SBG and will have it next year | ||||
33 | Glenwood, School District of Greenfield | 1 | No | School or district provided learning, DPI - Department of Public Instruction | More learning around phenomenon based science | 50-60 min daily | No | No scope | Locally created lessons/units, Mystery Science | yes. I would like some resources for our teachers to help them with the science standards. | Brought in more student sensemaking of phenomena, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations | Would love to look more into storylines. Also, just developed a science leadership team to develop scope and sequence at our school. | Rarely | yes, it is a part of each schools growth plan | no | no | yes, but not yet for science | |||||||||
34 | Glenwood - Greenfield School District | 1 | No | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), Workshops or meetings from other non-profit partners (e.g. nature centers, community groups), DPI - Department of Public Instruction | Alignment of units across grades and design of science units | 30 -40 min daily | No | Locally created lessons/units, Mystery Science | No, instructional materials are purchased at the district level. | Developed new standards-aligned units, Revised assessments, Brought in more student sensemaking of phenomena, Brought in more storylines where students make sense of phenomena over multiple units, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations | Continued alignment and development of units | Rarely | Yes - focused on equity, access and inclusion | Yes - developed by teachers and linked to science | Some classrooms have a maker space and it is separate | Yes, but currently our report card is being redesigned so I can not link it. | ||||||||||
35 | Prairie Hill Waldorf School | 1 | Yes | Networking with building-level colleagues, Online or in-person courses from higher ed, Workshops or meetings from other non-profit partners (e.g. nature centers, community groups) | we teach in blocks of 4 weeks; we have 3 science blocks / year (2 hours/day during the block) | Yes | Yes | Locally created lessons/units, Materials from Waldorf organizations | Locally created lessons/units, Materials from Waldorf organizations | no. We just went through a review and are confident in what we offer. | Developed rubrics based on the standards | Rarely | no | no | no | |||||||||||
36 | Milwaukee Jewish Day School | 1 | Yes | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, Workshops or meetings from other non-profit partners (e.g. nature centers, community groups), Ed consultants and science curriculum providers | Help unpacking and aligning NGSS to K-8th classrooms | 30-60min 2-3x a week in k-4th, 60mi 4x a week in 5-8th | Yes for 5th-8th. Not yet for younger grades. | Yes | Locally created lessons/units | Locally created lessons/units, IQWST | No | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Developed new standards-aligned units, Revised assessments, Brought in more student sensemaking of phenomena, Brought in more storylines where students make sense of phenomena over multiple units, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations, Developed rubrics based on the standards | Continue this work in our K-4th classrooms | Rarely | Yes | Yes, connected to science learning | Yes and yes | Yes | ||||||||
37 | West Allis-West Milwaukee | 1 | No | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, CESA | More resources for teachers | Switch back and forth between science and social studies | There are I Can statements for each grade | Teachers follow the I Can Statements for each grade | Locally created lessons/units, Mystery Science, FOSS | Yes, we would be interested in more science materials | Created common grade level I Can Statements/GVC | We try not to. | NA | NA | Yes, our district adopted Equity Beliefs | No | Depends on each school. | Yes | ||||||||
38 | New Testament Christian Academy | 1 | No | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, CESA, Online or in-person courses from higher ed, DPI - Department of Public Instruction | STEM/ STEAM , robotics, Legos, Project Lead the Way,... STEM/STEAM opportunities and lessons for young children lessons (K3-8 grades) | Science is planned and alternated with social studies by the quarter. | Yes | Mostly | Purposeful Design and Ignitia(?) | Ignitia | N/A | Possibly. | New curricula | Sometimes | No, we are primarily African- American. | We are attempting to develop a STEM program. | We have a limited science lab. | Yes, to a limited extent. | ||||||||
39 | Seton Catholic Schools | 1 | Yes | School or district provided learning | 40-50 min daily | Yes | Yes | Locally created lessons/units, Mystery Science | Amplify | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations | We just adopted Amplify for 6-8 this trimester. That is our focus! | Rarely | Yes. Instructionally: Closing the instructional gap by 10% in ELA and Math (also goals in hiring, anti racist PD, etc.) | no | no | Yes based on NGSS | ||||||||||
40 | Milwaukee College Prep | 1 | Yes | School or district provided learning, NSTA - National Science Teaching Association | 45-60 min every other day | Yes | Yes | Locally created lessons/units, Amplify | Amplify | No | Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Brought in more student sensemaking of phenomena | Rarely | yes | no | no | no | ||||||||||
41 | Shining Star Christian Schools | 1 | No | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), Workshops or meetings from other non-profit partners (e.g. nature centers, community groups) | Depending on the campus, Middle School has science either every day or every other day. Elementary School it is 30 minutes or less, every other day or if they can fit it in. | Yes | No | Flexpoint/FLVS (Online curriculum) | Flexpoint/FLVS (Online curriculum) | No- We just implemented FLVS and it appears to be meeting our needs. | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials | Sometimes | No | No | No | Yes; Just implemented this year; no link available. There are about 3 standards for Science at each grade level. | ||||||||||
42 | Hamilton School District | 1 | No | School or district provided learning | More professional learning about the science practices and cross cutting concepts and how to naturally incorporate them into my instruction to model for students | 40-50 min daily | Yes | Mostly | Amplify, TCI | Locally created lessons/units, Lab Aids | No | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Developed new standards-aligned units, Revised assessments, Brought in more storylines where students make sense of phenomena over multiple units, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations, Developed rubrics based on the standards | Continue to roll our our current plan | Rarely | yes | yes separate | no | yes-content and practices are assessed using rubrics | ||||||||
43 | Richmond School | 1 | Yes | School or district provided learning, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), Online or in-person courses from higher ed | I am good right now, working on Kesler Science and Blended Learning and how to incorporate in the science classroom. | 40-50 min daily | Yes | Mostly | Mystery Science | PLTW - Project Lead the Way - Gateway, Kesler and Saavas | No, we are in the middle of a Saavas Subscription right now. | Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Revised assessments, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations, Developed rubrics based on the standards | Don't have any as of now. | Rarely | Not sure. | Yes, we use it as an elective that is science based. | Yes, it is a stand alone class for grades K-5. | Yes. | ||||||||
44 | St. Paul Lutheran Grafton WI | 1 | Yes | WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), Online or in-person courses from higher ed | 40-50 min daily | Yes | Mostly | SAVVAS Elevate | SAVVAS Elavate | No Just purchased this curriculum | Developed new standards-aligned units | Never | No | No | No | |||||||||||
45 | Wauwatosa School District- Roosevelt Elementary | 1 | No | School or district provided learning, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups) | 30 min or less every other day | Yes | No | Locally created lessons/units, Sangari | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Revised assessments, Brought in more student sensemaking of phenomena, Work started on the ones checked above, however, there has not been much follow through. | Unknown | Often | Yes | My specific school does not, however, we have two elementary STEM schools and two middle school STEM programs in our district. | My school does not, but other schools in the district have them. | Yes- Communicate scientific information; Core concepts and ideas of science; Model to represent ideas, explanations, and events; Gather and analyze data; Overall Effort | |||||||||||
46 | St. Josaphat Parish School / Archdiocese of Milwaukee | 1 | Yes | School or district provided learning | 40-50 min daily | Yes | Yes | Locally created lessons/units | Not at this time. What I do with what I have works. | Revised assessments, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations | Continue to implement the new standards throughout the what we do. | Sometimes | Robotics Club is separate. | Yes. Separate. | Yes. The Archmil Standards. | |||||||||||
47 | Notre Dame School of Milwaukee, Archdiocese of Milwaukee | 1 | Yes | WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), NSTA - National Science Teaching Association, Online or in-person courses from higher ed, Workshops or meetings from other non-profit partners (e.g. nature centers, community groups) | 45 min, three days a week | No | FOSS | Personally created lessons (me), Museum of Science and Industry (girls campus0 | NO - the younger grades are happy enough with FOSS and I'm happy enough doing my own thing! | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Developed new standards-aligned units, Revised assessments, Brought in more student sensemaking of phenomena, Brought in more storylines where students make sense of phenomena over multiple units, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations, Developed rubrics based on the standards, The Archdiocese of Milwaukee has a set of standards that look exactly like the NGSS.... | none | Sometimes | I'm not sure. | Sort of - Supposedly I am the STEM coordinator- what it means is that I share resources as i find them and then I teach the 1st -4th grade classes once or twice a month. Those lessons are typically 45 minutes and I try to design a lesson that is engineering based and related to what they are currently learning. | No | not really - we are standards based learning but traditional grading (don;t get me going on this). We should be moving to a 4 pint scale next year. | ||||||||||
48 | Mt. Olive Lutheran School | 1 | Yes | School or district provided learning, Workshops or meetings from other non-profit partners (e.g. nature centers, community groups) | 30 min or less every other day | Yes | Yes | BJU Press Science Curriculum | No, just chose this curriculum this year | Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Support more student talk/dialogue | Review curriculum after initial year's use | Never | NA | We have STEM specific projects built in throughout our new curriculum | No | No | ||||||||||
49 | Meadowbrook Elementary School- Waukesha | 1 | Yes | School or district provided learning | N/A | Science alternates with Social Studies instruction. This typically is about a 30-minute block each day. If a unit requires daily instruction for a prolonged period of time, we honor that. | Yes | Mostly | FOSS | Not to my knowledge | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence | I implement what is shared with me. We have a Science representative from our building who is part of this work as a district. | Sometimes | We are in the midst of redeveloping one. | We do not have a STEM program at our school, but our district offers both an elementary and middle STEM school. | Yes- we have carts that are occasionally used by teachers for PBL projects. | Yes | |||||||||
50 | Mahone Middle School, KUSD | 1 | No | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers, NSTA - National Science Teaching Association, Online or in-person courses from higher ed, Workshops or meetings from other non-profit partners (e.g. nature centers, community groups) | I woul dlike our district to align itself with WSST and NSTA's philosphy on use of specific strategies that help us develop students to think like scientists in the classroom. | 50-60 min daily | not in the district, but we have taken the curriculum purchased and developed the scope and sequence so we can scaffold the units based on development needs of our students and in preparation for the 8th grade expectations on the FORWARD. | Yes | HMH - Houghton Mifflin Harcourt | No, however, science should be starting their first year of the adoption cycle sometime this summer for the next school year (2022.23 school year). | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Developed new standards-aligned units, Revised assessments, Brought in more student sensemaking of phenomena, Brought in more storylines where students make sense of phenomena over multiple units, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations, Developed rubrics based on the standards | Determining levels of proficiency for standards being assess within in each unit of study. We focus heavily on the formal lab report (CER) with each grade level prioritizing the level of proficiency by scaffolding the CER process. By the time they exit 8th grade, our students are proficient or at the very least have a foundation of the scientific inquiry process and can justify their thinking through inquiry (formal lab process). | Never | Yes, Educational outcome disparities are not the result of deficiencies in marginalized communities' cultures, mind sets, or grittiness, but rather of inequities. Equity initiatives focus, not on fixing marginalized people, but on fixing the conditions the marginalize people. - Paul Giorski - Equity in our district is about 1. Reducint the predictability of who succeeds and who fails. 2. Equity is interrupting reproductive practices that negatively impact vulnerable and marginalized students. 3. Equity is cultivating the unique gifts and talents of every student. | Ye, but unfortunately it is separate. | Yes, but it is not connected to science learning. It is housed in the library and does have many inquiry supported thinking. | No. | (said they don't receive it) | ||||||||
51 | Garland School Milwaukee Public Schools | 1 | Yes | School or district provided learning | In-person professional development. | 40-50 min daily | Yes | Yes | HMH - Houghton Mifflin Harcourt | No, as we just began a new adoption this year. | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Developed new standards-aligned units | Follow the new adoption while differentiating it for all learners. | Never | Yes, we do and always have an equity initiative | Yes, we implement STEM into our science, math, technology, and art programs. | No! | Yes, though we grade by rubrics. | |||||||||
52 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
53 | School District of Monroe | 2 | Yes | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, CESA, WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), NSTA - National Science Teaching Association, Online or in-person courses from higher ed, DPI - Department of Public Instruction | > 60 min daily | Yes | Mostly | Locally created lessons/units, Open Education Resources (OER) such as iHub, HHMI, etc., PLTW - Project Lead the Way | Not for a few years | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Developed new standards-aligned units, Revised assessments, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations, Developed rubrics based on the standards | Rarely | Few students | Some students | Most students | No students | no | na | yes | separate | yes separate | starting to | |||||
54 | Delavan-Darien High School | 2 | Yes | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, CESA, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), Workshops or meetings from other non-profit partners (e.g. nature centers, community groups) | 40-50 min daily | Yes | Yes | HMH | No. We just adopted new curriculum for science materials. | Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Revised assessments, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations, Incorporating Close Read strategy, along with John Hattie strategies of "Teacher Clarity" and "Classroom Discourse", while also implementing TPT's (Total Participation Techniques). | Continually review data in our PLC's to show we're impacting the growth of all students. | Never | Few students | Most students | No students | No students | We strive to treat all students equitably, therefore requiring Biology as an entry point, followed by either Core-Chemistry or Chemistry, based on a students college/career pathway. | No, however, we do strive to meet the individual needs/desires/goals of all students, regardless of gender, race, etc... | Yes, but not connected necessarily to science/math. If a student desires to take a STEM course, they're openly invited, and they commit to that out of self-selection based on college/career interest. | Yes, it began as a stand-alone lab, but is now integrated into our business/science/CTE space. | No. | |||||
55 | Jefferson High School School District of Jefferson | 2 | Yes | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), DPI - Department of Public Instruction | > 60 min every other day | Yes | Mostly | Mystery Science | FOSS | Locally created lessons/units, Open Education Resources (OER) such as iHub, HHMI, etc., Biology- Storylines from Illinois Teachers | Yes- We are currenlty realigning our core curriculum courses and looking for gaps in our curriculum. We are also looking at Storylines that have been developed for Chemistry. In addition we are looking to add a new semester course in Zoology. | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Revised assessments, Brought in more storylines where students make sense of phenomena over multiple units, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations | We are in the 3rd year of implementing the Biology Storylines. We are looking to add Zoology and to implement some units of study next fall in Chemsitry involving Storylines. | Rarely | Few students | Most students | No students | No students | N/A | No | Yes; no it is not. | No | ||||
56 | School District of Jefferson | 2 | Yes | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups) | I like to be continually updated on best practices in teaching science and using the NGSS. | 40-50 min daily | Yes | Yes | Locally created lessons/units, Open Education Resources (OER) such as iHub, HHMI, etc., ISTA Storylines in Biology | Our physical science and chem teachers are looking at different storylining curricula | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Developed new standards-aligned units, Revised assessments, Brought in more storylines where students make sense of phenomena over multiple units, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations | Aligning all of our courses with NGSS. | Never | Few students | No students | No students | Bio, Phys Sci, various 3rd year | N/A | No | No | Yes. It is connected to our tech ed department. | No. | ||||
57 | School District of Janesville | 2 | No | Networking with building-level colleagues, WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), NSTA - National Science Teaching Association, Workshops or meetings from other non-profit partners (e.g. nature centers, community groups), DPI - Department of Public Instruction | 3D implementation frameworks (adoption, professional learning, resource alignment, curriculum, SBG, instructional frameworks, etc.) | ES: supposed to be 30 min every other day but some do not get to it, MS/HS: ~42-48 minutes | at some levels fully implemented and others are re-working related to adoption cycles | mixed based on level and/or building and course | Inspire Science | Currently using iScience and supplementing with Gizmos. We will implement openscied in 22-23 | Locally created lessons/units, Open Education Resources (OER) such as iHub, HHMI, etc., PLTW - Project Lead the Way, AP, articulated, Glencoe, really a mixture across the board based on core and/or elective area | yes- general chemistry, Earth (earth/space integrated), A&P, K-5 | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Revised assessments, Brought in more student sensemaking of phenomena, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations, Developed rubrics based on the standards, depends on grade band K-5: none, MS: SEP integration and new adoption, HS: curriculum work and bio adoption | MS: implementation of Openscied followed by curriculum work; ES: eventual adoption, HS: curricular work around common asseessments and SBG, as well as resource adoption and alignment | mostly happens K5 if it does- we keep students in core | Few students | Few students | Some students | Some students | we have an equity statement and utilize equity practices | Yes, both | Yes in some schools, usage and purpose of space varies by building, teacher, etc. | yes, K-8 and are moving that way 9-12 | |||
58 | Wisconsin Heights Middle School | 2 | Yes | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), NSTA - National Science Teaching Association | Making inquiry based labs | 40-50 min daily | Kind of mixed around. Middle school is more structured than the high school as for grade levels | Mostly | Locally created lessons/units, Amplify, DiscoveryEd | Unsure | Developed new standards-aligned units, Revised assessments, Brought in more student sensemaking of phenomena, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations | Still working on implementing CER in building steps from 6th all the way to 12th grade, gradually releasing supports | Sometimes | Few students | Most students | Some students | Few students | N/A, unsure | Unsure | no | no but there is a space for tech ed | yes | ||||
59 | Shabazz High School, Madison Metropolitan School District | 2 | Yes | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, Workshops or meetings from other non-profit partners (e.g. nature centers, community groups) | I'd love to have space and time to shadow other schools/programs. | > 60 min daily | Yes | Mostly | Locally created lessons/units | It would be nice to have access to them at least to utilize as useful. | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Developed new standards-aligned units, Revised assessments, Brought in more student sensemaking of phenomena, Brought in more storylines where students make sense of phenomena over multiple units, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations, Developed rubrics based on the standards | Continue to work on sequencing classes and experiences within classes. | Rarely | Few students | Some students | Some students | Some students | We try to give students a wide range of choices in courses that are high interest, so we have a high amount of choice. | WE do our best to support students on all levels and assess data as such. | Yes. Continue to support and assess how we address the needs of students of color in our buildings'. | Yes. Only math and science class. Not something explicitly STEM. | No. It would be great though to have the space. | Not yet. Slowly working on it. | |||
60 | Janesville School District | 2 | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), NSTA - National Science Teaching Association, DPI - Department of Public Instruction | Varies by level and building. 6-12 ~47 min and K-5 ~0-30 min 0-3 times per week | Yes | varies by level | inspire | OpenSciEd | Locally created lessons/units, Open Education Resources (OER) such as iHub, HHMI, etc., PLTW - Project Lead the Way | Yes- in an adoption cycle | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Revised assessments, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations, Developed rubrics based on the standards | Curriculum adoption and support for the instructional shifts | Rarely | Few students | Some students | Some students | Some students | Yes | yes- both, varies by level/building | yes- both, varies by level/building | yes- K-8. Varies by level but gist is a DCI type standard and the rest reflect grouped SEPs/skills | |||||
61 | Clinton Community School District | 2 | Yes | School or district provided learning, NSTA - National Science Teaching Association | 40-50 min daily | No | No scope & sequence | Locally created lessons/units | Yes--new science class is being taught | Developed new standards-aligned units, Revised assessments, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations, Developed rubrics based on the standards | Rarely | Most students | Few students | Few students | Few students | N/a | Yes--honors students and non-honors students are placed in the same science course so that they are all provided the same learning opportunities. | No | No | Yes--there are three Pillars used throughout all science courses: data investigation, modeling, and communicating science ideas. | ||||||
62 | Union Grove Union High School District | 2 | No | Networking with building-level colleagues, CESA, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), WSELA | 3-D Assessment, How to help those who are reluctant to adjust from the "old way" of teaching | ~83 minute block each day for 2 terms for most classes (AP Chem and AP Bio are 83 minute blocks each day for 4 terms) | The process is currently in progress. | Depends on the teacher | N/A: We are a 9-12 district | N/A: We are a 9-12 district | Locally created lessons/units, American Modeling Teachers Association (AMTA), PLTW - Project Lead the Way | No. We are fairly happen the skeletons of the AMTA materials, but we are always modifying to improve and fill "holes" | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Developed new standards-aligned units, Revised assessments, Brought in more student sensemaking of phenomena, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations, Developed rubrics based on the standards | Continue the development of updated Scope/Sequence and find development opportunities for those who are reluctant to adapt to the new changes | Rarely | Most students | Some students | No students | No students | Next year we will be adding an Earth and Space Science option so that most students will go Bio --> Chem --> Physics or Earth and Space | N/A | Not that I am aware of | Yes, but it is largely separate. We, the Science Department, have been pushing for stronger ties, but it does not seem to be a high priority item. | No, but the engineering teacher has been working hard on securing fund for this type of space. | No | |
63 | New Glarus School District | 2 | Yes | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, DPI - Department of Public Instruction | > 60 min daily | Yes | Yes | CKLA | PLTW - Project Lead the Way - Gateway | Locally created lessons/units | Yes. We are waiting to see some reviews on EdReports for high quality high school curriculum. | Developed new standards-aligned units, Revised assessments | Implement a high quality curriculum at the middle and high school level | Never | Most students | Most students | We have eliminated any lower tracks that would take students out of our expected courses. | Yes- closing gaps with our most underrepresented populations. | No | No | Not formally, but several departments do. | |||||
64 | O'Keeffe MS, MMSD | 2 | Yes | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers, NSTA - National Science Teaching Association | None. I'd like the district to honor science more and give us more time and latitude for integrated science learning. | 40-50 min daily | Yes | Mostly | Amplify | Locally created lessons/units | Not that I know of. We recently adopted Amplify. It's not popular with teachers in my building. | Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials | In my first year of Amplify, I'm focusing on getting the gist of the phenomena and story lines. | Rarely | Most students | ? | ? | Yes. | I think the HS does. I've been discouraged from using my Advanced Math space as a STEM space. I don't know why. | Yes. Separate from science, but available to us if we can make the time. | Yes. Categories are the unit names from Amplify. | |||||
65 | Washington Caldwell School District | 2 | No | School or district provided learning, CESA, Workshops or meetings from other non-profit partners (e.g. nature centers, community groups), DPI - Department of Public Instruction | NSTA and WSST PD for all staff focusing on science and STEAM philosophy and application integration. | 35 - 45 min every other day | Yes | Mostly | Locally created lessons/units, PLTW - Project Lead the Way - Launch | Locally created lessons/units, PLTW - Project Lead the Way - Gateway | n/a | Yes, we are beginning to identify and align our science curriculum, resources and practices. | Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations | Continue to identify needs, resources and create consistent and clear expectations for science instruction. We are developing a strategic plan to embed STEAM into our daily work across the content areas. | Sometimes | No students | No students | No students | No students | n/a | n/a | yes, to provide resources to support all students. | no- we are in the process of defining and identifying needs to build a strong platform for STEAM as a focus of our work. | yes, being developed. It is somewhat connected. | yes. | |
66 | Williams Bay School District | 2 | Yes | Networking with building-level colleagues, WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), NSTA - National Science Teaching Association, Online or in-person courses from higher ed, Workshops or meetings from other non-profit partners (e.g. nature centers, community groups) | > 60 min every other day | Yes | Mostly | Locally created lessons/units, HMH | Locally created lessons/units, HMH - Houghton Mifflin Harcourt | Locally created lessons/units, Open Education Resources (OER) such as iHub, HHMI, etc. | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Developed new standards-aligned units, Brought in more student sensemaking of phenomena, Brought in more storylines where students make sense of phenomena over multiple units, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations | Revising our assessments and rubrics based upon performance expectations | Rarely | Some students | Most students | No students | No students | N/A | We do not have a formal equity initiative as it relates to science instruction. | Connected to science learning. We are working towards implementing a complete STEM program with the inclusion of a menu of engineering elective options. | Yes, it is formally connected to both science learning and the technology department. | Not formally. We are working towards curriculum alignment that incorporates standards-based grading at the moment. | ||||
67 | FJ Turner High School, School District of Beloit Turner | 2 | No | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, CESA, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), Individual Contracts | Rigor and Alignment of Assessments to the standards | > 60 min every other day | Yes | Mostly | Locally created lessons/units | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Developed new standards-aligned units, Revised assessments | Some students | Most students | No students | No students | Bio, Broadfield, Chem (as alternative to Bio-Chem) | We have de-tracked all our course sequences. The "regular" pathway has the same rigor expectations as the "alternative" pathway. Passion drives the decisions, not performance. | Equity is a constant lens, though no formal identified "initiative" | Yes, separate. | Yes, available to whole building. Primarily used by STEM | Yes https://turnerschools.org/academics/curriculum_and_assessment/standards_based_grading | ||||||
68 | Oregon High School | 2 | Yes | Networking with building-level colleagues, WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), ChemEd and AACT Webinars | I honestly have no time for more professional learning this year | 40-50 min daily | Yes | Mostly | Locally created lessons/units, American Modeling Teachers Association (AMTA), PLTW - Project Lead the Way | We are always adding new ideas to our locally created lessons. We have adopted NGSS | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Developed new standards-aligned units, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations, I am only aware of work done at the high school level | Adding more 3-D assessments | Rarely | Some students | Most students | No students | No students | We do not have a course called physical science. Freshmen who are not ready for biology take Environmental Science, Applied Physics, and/or Earth and Space Science. All are one semester stand alone courses. | I don't know | We have a focus on equity and I can't describe it | We have a STEM course at the middle school level | Yes. At the high school it is connected to and used by our Technology Education department, but is near science. | No | |||
69 | Union Grove Union High School | 2 | No | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues | I need to pro-actively search out other options listed above. I know that NSTA, AAPT have good resources. I just need to use them. | Yes | Yes | Locally created lessons/units, American Modeling Teachers Association (AMTA), PLTW - Project Lead the Way | Not at this time - the above materials are well-structured. | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Revised assessments, Brought in more student sensemaking of phenomena | Reviewing alignment | Some students | Some students | No students | No students | Unsure | Unsure | Unsure | Unsure | No | ||||||
70 | DeForest Area High School, DeForest Area Schools | 2 | Yes | School or district provided learning, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups) | differentiated instruction in higher level classes, like Physics | > 60 min every other day | Yes | Mostly | Locally created lessons/units | Locally created lessons/units, Open Education Resources (OER) such as iHub, HHMI, etc., American Modeling Teachers Association (AMTA), PLTW - Project Lead the Way | no, I think we are generally happy with what we have and are doing, and are seeing positive student interest and performance growth. | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Developed new standards-aligned units, Revised assessments, Brought in more storylines where students make sense of phenomena over multiple units, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations, Developed rubrics based on the standards | We are eliminating Physical Science as our 9th grade course, and moving all 9th graders to taking Biology. This will mean that Chemistry moves down to a largely 10th grade class, and Physics to 11th. These changes will require revising the curriculum in all three course to meet those students at their level, and to differentiate to wider range of student needs. | Sometimes | Some students | Some students | Some students | Some students | No systematic process exists, but the change to 9th grade Biology is in part to equalize access to biology as the 9th grade course. In the past, parents 'in the know' would agitate that their kid should be allowed to skip Physical Science and take Biology, and there was really nothing we could do to stop it. We have tried in the past few years to seek out 8th graders who are academically advanced, and suggest that they take Biology, but that pool is still underrepresenting non-white student populations. The Science Dept. is starting to collect data on under-represented groups in the upper level courses, to see if any changes we make impact student enrollment in those classes. | yes, the district has a strong commitment to Equity, but I don't think there is a clear set of actions to improve educational equity in the high school. | No | no, because while we have the tools and materials, the district is not willing to pay staff to supervise a maker space in after school hours, and no staff are interested in doing so voluntarily. | Yes, sort of. We are all supposed to be using standards-based grading, but each course is allowed to determine what that looks like, so some courses are much more standards-based in the grading than others. | |||
71 | Oregon High School | 2 | Yes | School or district provided learning, WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), NSTA - National Science Teaching Association, WSELA | 40-50 min daily | Yes | Mostly | Locally created lessons/units, FOSS | Locally created lessons/units | Locally created lessons/units, Open Education Resources (OER) such as iHub, HHMI, etc. | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Developed new standards-aligned units, Revised assessments, Brought in more student sensemaking of phenomena, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations | Rarely | Some students | We purposely do not have a standard pathway to allow students to make their own path | We are trying to encourage kids to have at least one course in each strand of the NGSS (Earth/Space, Physical, Life) but the district isn't ready to mandate that. | I know we are currently working on our equity initiative, but I don't know that we have anything formal yet. | Separate...it's part of tech ed. | Not yet...definitely coming though | ||||||||
72 | Kenosha Unified | 2 | Yes | Networking with building-level colleagues, WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers | > 60 min daily | Yes | Mostly | Locally created lessons/units, PLTW - Project Lead the Way | Developed new standards-aligned units | Rarely | Some students | ? | yes | no | yes | |||||||||||
73 | School District of Beloit | 2 | Yes | WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers, NSTA - National Science Teaching Association, Online or in-person courses from higher ed, DPI - Department of Public Instruction | I would like to see more on instructional leaders leading the change in their districts. | 30 -40 min daily | Yes | Mostly | Amplify, Mystery Science, HMH Science Dimensions | Amplify | Locally created lessons/units | Need to find more NGSS aligned materials for the high school level. | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Developed new standards-aligned units, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations | Getting high a school to have units more aligned to NGSS and then looking at redoing the K-3 program | Sometimes | Most students | This is a current focus. Very few students of color take AP and honors and a 4th science class. | Yea. We are working on providing all students with a solid science foundation. We are keeping our eye on the data to ensure what we are doing is working for all of our students. | We are in the process of connecting the various programs to make one STEM vision. | In the elementary schools it is part of the library. We also have a small maker space at our alternative school. | Yes for K-5. The standards are based on the practices. I hope this link works, otherwise, email me and I will directly share it with you. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Fg8RfnlMpmgf9V2gepa8cpEdFhHFVip9huVj4IdmJM8/copy | |||||
74 | Monroe High School | 2 | Yes | WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), Online or in-person courses from higher ed, Workshops or meetings from other non-profit partners (e.g. nature centers, community groups) | I do appreciate a good summer workshop | 50-60 min daily | We are getting there, but not there yet. | Mostly | Locally created lessons/units, FOSS | Locally created lessons/units | Locally created lessons/units | no | Developed new standards-aligned units, Revised assessments, Developed rubrics based on the standards | complete writing essential questions and learning targets | Rarely | Most students | bio and chem can be taken concurrently. | N/A | no | yes, separate. PLTW | yes...no | no (but working toward it) | ||||
75 | School District of Milton | 2 | Yes | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, Workshops or meetings from other non-profit partners (e.g. nature centers, community groups) | 30 -40 min daily | Yes | Yes | HMH - Houghton Mifflin Harcourt | PLTW - Project Lead the Way | no | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Developed new standards-aligned units, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations, Developed rubrics based on the standards | transition to SBG | Never | Most students | no | no | working on it this year | |||||||||
76 | Delavan-Darien School District | 2 | Yes | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, DPI - Department of Public Instruction | understanding different science curricula - what other districts are using? What is the most impactful? | 40-50 min daily | Yes | Mostly | HMH Science Dimensions | IQWST | Yes, we are in our last year with IQWST | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations | Science/social studies instructional coach is leading this process, so not sure what is coming next | Never | Most students | N/A | No - but we need to move forward with that | No | Yes, separate | No | ||||||
77 | Watertown High school | 2 | Yes | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), NSTA - National Science Teaching Association, Online or in-person courses from higher ed, DPI - Department of Public Instruction | > 60 min daily | For our school - yes - for the district - no | Yes | Locally created lessons/units, Open Education Resources (OER) such as iHub, HHMI, etc., PLTW - Project Lead the Way | Most likely AP Physics textbooks. | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Developed new standards-aligned units, Revised assessments, Brought in more student sensemaking of phenomena, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations, Developed rubrics based on the standards | WICOR and AVID strategies for literacy | Sometimes | Most students | We have guidance counselors help during the registration process, we also meet with students individually as needed, we talk about the courses in all of our science classes, and we get a list of students who have registered for each course to ensure they are taking the right courses for what they need/want. | I do not know. | Yes - yes it is connected to science learning. | Yes - both | The high school does not but our Endeavor Charter School does (a separate school entity than the high school). | ||||||||
78 | MMSD | 2 | Yes | School or district provided learning, WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers, NSTA - National Science Teaching Association, Workshops or meetings from other non-profit partners (e.g. nature centers, community groups), DPI - Department of Public Instruction | 30 -40 min daily | Yes | Mostly | Amplify | Amplify | no for k-8, yes for some specific HS courses | Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Revised assessments, Brought in more student sensemaking of phenomena, Brought in more storylines where students make sense of phenomena over multiple units, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations | Never | Most students | yes, but we are re-doing our website and I can't find the specific verbiage the district uses. | some schools have a specific STEM class students can choose to enroll in. It depends on the school on if it is connected to science learning or if it is more of a maker space. | some do | Yes-ish. We are standards based as in teachers are grading based on selected focus DCIs but we do not have a good rubric. All entered grades then get boiled down into one letter grade for Science. | |||||||||
79 | Yorkville Elementary | 2 | No | WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers | 40-50 min daily | Yes | Mostly | HMH Science Dimensions | HMH - Houghton Mifflin Harcourt | No | Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Brought in more student sensemaking of phenomena, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations | Rarely | Most students | no | no | no | no | |||||||||
80 | BASD - Burlington | 2 | No | Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), NSTA - National Science Teaching Association, Workshops or meetings from other non-profit partners (e.g. nature centers, community groups) | 40-50 min daily | Yes | Mostly | Locally created lessons/units, Open Education Resources (OER) such as iHub, HHMI, etc. | no. Show me the money | nothing | Sometimes | Most students | not much... | not sure | yes | no | we will be next year. Terrible concept. | |||||||||
81 | St John's Lutheran School | 2 | Yes | School or district provided learning, Online or in-person courses from higher ed | none | 40-50 min daily | Yes | Yes | Locally created lessons/units, PLTW - Project Lead the Way - Launch, McGraw-Hill | Locally created lessons/units, PLTW - Project Lead the Way - Gateway, McGraw-Hill | no | Sometimes | Most students | n/a | n/a | no | yes - connected | no | no | |||||||
82 | MMSD | 2 | Yes | WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers, NSTA - National Science Teaching Association, Online or in-person courses from higher ed, Amplify Science/Lawrence Hall of Science | 40-50 min daily | Yes | Mostly | Amplify | Amplify | Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Brought in more student sensemaking of phenomena, Brought in more storylines where students make sense of phenomena over multiple units, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations | Sometimes | Most students | yes - The office of Equity and Engagement actively uses universal and targeted strategies aimed to disrupt societal and historical inequities and eliminate disparities based on race and socioeconomic status so that our entire learning community, including all staff and all students, benefit and thrive. | |||||||||||||
83 | Beloit Memorial High School/ School District of Beloit | 2 | Yes | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, CESA, NSTA - National Science Teaching Association, Online or in-person courses from higher ed, Workshops or meetings from other non-profit partners (e.g. nature centers, community groups) | > 60 min daily | We are in the process of evaluating and revising our K-12 science articulation. | Mystery Science, K-3 is Mystery Science, 4-5 is Amplify | Amplify | Locally created lessons/units | Yes, looking to move to Project Based Learning for 9th grade Physical Science | Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations, Developed rubrics based on the standards, We use the NGSS. | Sometimes | Most students | All classes are open to all students. We do not have pre-requisite grade requirements. We very much focus on eliminating barriers for students. | Yes. Again, there is no tracking. We encourage all students to go as far as they can in the levels of science. | Yes - PLTW Engineering, provided by the Tech Ed. Dept. | No | Not yet, but we are moving in that direction. | ||||||||
84 | School District of Belleville | 2 | No | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, PLTW | More opportunities to explore science resources at reasonable costs | 30 -40 min daily | No | We know which units are taught in each grade level in PLTW but we know these units don't cover all science standards. | PLTW - Project Lead the Way - Launch | PLTW - Project Lead the Way - Gateway | I'm not sure | Yes- looking for science materials in grades 5-6 to supplement | Developed new standards-aligned units, Support more student talk/dialogue | Need to revisit with our ELA review as we take an integrated approach | Sometimes | I'm only at the elementary level | One of our district core values- not a true initiative | Yes- connected with PLTW and high school STEAM courses | High school yes- elementary school- no | Yes | ||||||
85 | Lakewood School/Twin Lakes District #4 | 2 | No | Current best practices | 30 min or less every other day | No | Fusion Houghton Mifflin Harcourt | Locally created lessons/units, Fusion Houghton Mifflin Harcourt | Yes. The teachers say the current materials are not engaging. We would also like to add PLTW back in. | I am just starting in this role. We need to create a scope and sequence and review materials. | I am not sure yet because there are issues with the reading materials and social studies materials as well. | Sometimes | No | No | No | Yes | ||||||||||
86 | Darien Elementary, Delavan-Darien School District | 2 | Yes | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, CESA | Not sure at this time | 40-50 min daily | Yes | Mostly | HMH Science Dimensions | No-just purchased within the last 2 years. | Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations | Discussions around asseessment | Sometimes | No | No | Yes | Yes (Science 3 (Overall Grade) Science Process Observes, asks questions, collects data Applies scientific process Science Content Discusses scientific ideas Demonstrates an understanding of scientific content and concepts | |||||||||
87 | Douglas Elementary - Watertown Unified School District | 2 | No | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, Videos found online about standards, Using online platforms - mystery science, generation genius | Clarification for my elementary teachers on the science standards, units for their grade level, and how to assess student learning —- specifically showing an “old” science test as compared to a new assessment for the current standards would be great. | 30 min or less every other day | We have the units mapped out for each grade level, not specific targets | Yes | Mystery Science, Generation Genius | Yes! We have mystery science and generation genius, and want to make sure we are on the right track. We have not explored other resources. | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Developed new standards-aligned units | I think our teachers would benefit from working with someone on assessments and understanding the targets/standards. Also, strategies for engaging students in science would be great. | Rarely | No - our media specialists do integrate stem into their classes | No | Yes - reading, writing, math, science, social studies, music, PE, art —- though we do not have specific science standards on our report card | ||||||||||
88 | Reek Elementary Linn J6 | 2 | Yes | School or district provided learning, NGSS website | 50-60 min daily | We are about to adopt a new curriculum - so there will be. | Yes | Amplify, FOSS, We currently use dated Foss resources. We will soon have Amplify | Amplify, We currently use dated Foss resources. We will soon have Amplify | Yes, we enjoy a variety of options for reaching kids! | Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations | All of middle school will be switching to Amplify Science in the coming weeks. | Often | Yes - it is a separate class for all students - every day for a quarter of the year. | no | yes - (A= 90%-100%) (B=80%-89%) (C=70%-79%) (D=60%-69%) (F= <59%) | ||||||||||
89 | Marshall Public Schools | 2 | Yes | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, CESA | > 60 min every other day | No | No | Mystery Science | Locally created lessons/units | Locally created lessons/units | yes, we are in the process of prioritizing content standards, creating unit plans and a scope and sequence. | Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations | Prioritizing standards, creating unit plans and creating a k-12 scope and sequence | Sometimes | Science 9 (integrated year long course), Human Biology (1 sem) required for all various other options to meet requirements | N/A | yes -working on foundational instruction using GRR framework so all students are brought into CL and guided instruction is occurring. | no | no | yes | ||||||
90 | Preschool of the Arts | 2 | Yes | School or district provided learning, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), Workshops or meetings from other non-profit partners (e.g. nature centers, community groups), Felllow teachers at the school | How to implement inquiry based science in the classroom. | We typically touch on nature based science each day, even though it isn't scheduled into our curriculum. | No | N/A | Locally created lessons/units | Not exactly. We are always open to new ideas and materials, but we aren't actively searching at this time. | Brought in more student sensemaking of phenomena, Brought in more storylines where students make sense of phenomena over multiple units, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations, Developed rubrics based on the standards | Exploring science tops that are relevant to the lives of our students. | Never | We have a school-wide group called the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Committee | No | Yes. It is inclusive of our science expiration. | No. | |||||||||
91 | Hickory Hill Academy | 2 | No | School or district provided learning | I would love information on any science & STEM specific trainings available online or in my area in Dane county. | We get 45 minutes for 3 days a week for science and 45 for one day per week for STEM for each classroom.. | Yes, but I have a lot of freedom to add to the curriculum and create my own as well. | I am the lead and I do follow it and also add to it as our students are somewhat advanced in science and nature studies. | Locally created lessons/units, TCI - Bringing Science Alive | Looking for support materials but not a whole curriculum. | Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Developed new standards-aligned units, Brought in more student sensemaking of phenomena, Brought in more storylines where students make sense of phenomena over multiple units, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations | We have a curriculum that is aligned with NGSS but we also have our own private school standards (that are very similar to NGSS). | Rarely | I am not sure. | Yes, we began it this year but I am creating it as I go and utilizing online curriculum resources from various sources. It is directly connected to our science classes that I teach and often it ties into the curriculum lesson we are in. | We have a maker space for summer and are creating one for our new school that will be built in a year or two. We do have a science school bus that has heat and air conditioning that we can utilize for a nature oriented learning space. | We discuss standards goals with parents, but there are not specific grades. | |||||||||
92 | Saint Maria Goretti Catholic School, Diocese of Madison | 2 | No | Wer aren't really... beyond curriculum support from a publisher upon adopting a new curriculum. | Job-embedded; Planning Instruction (What do I want students to know / be able to do? How will I know they've learned it? What will I do if they've already learned it? What will I do if they haven't learned it yet?). | < 30min. 3-4x/week in elementary; approx. 50min/day 4x/week in Middle School | No | N/A | Amplify | Amplify | We don't go beyond Grade 8 | We will be renewing Science curriculum within the next 2-3 years. | Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials | Curriculum mapping; PLC planning and response to student learning (RtI) | Never | N/A as we don't go beyond Grade 8 | N/A | No, we are a Catholic school that acknowledges that every student being created in God's Image and Likeness. We want every child to know 1) Why they were created. 2) What their purpose in life is. 3) What is their ultimate destiny. | No | No | No | |||||
93 | Monroe Middle School - Monroe School District | 2 | Yes | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups) | 50-60 min daily | Yes | Yes | Locally created lessons/units | Not currently - we have worked hard to develop our scope and sequence and are happy with the rigor and variety of our curriculum. | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Revised assessments, Support more student talk/dialogue, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations | Rarely | Yes - maker space. It is separate from science learning. | No, but our department aligns each formative to one standard so we can easily determine if a student is meeting or exceeding proficiency. | |||||||||||||
94 | UW Madison, Create 4 STEM | 2 | No | Online or in-person courses from higher ed, DPI - Department of Public Instruction | I would like more connection between local scientists. the work they are doing on the ground, and educational communities. In my view, there needs to be a stronger network between the science world, social action groups, and educators and schools. | I think curriculum has taken the place of.developing that in schools. If the curriulum has a clear scope and sequence then the schools / districts don't worry about it. That is my sense any way. | Science in elementary is still a black box for a lot of teachers I speak with. They still don't feel personally connected to the science, or personally intrigued by the challenge of teaching it. | Amplify | Amplify | |||||||||||||||||
95 | Madison Metropolitan School District | 2 | Yes | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups), NSTA - National Science Teaching Association, Workshops or meetings from other non-profit partners (e.g. nature centers, community groups), DPI - Department of Public Instruction | 30 min or less every other day | No | Amplify, FOSS | No. In transition to new materials: Amplify | Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials | Continue K-5 implementation of new science resource, Amplify, and support connections to literacy. | Sometimes | Yes. Black Excellence: the learning and experience of students in our black community will be uplifted. | No | Some schools do, but no district support. | Sort of. | |||||||||||
96 | Monona Grove School District; MG21 | 2 | Yes | WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups) | More opportunities to work with science teachers who specialize in HS project-based learning. | > 60 min every other day | No | Locally created lessons/units, Open Education Resources (OER) such as iHub, HHMI, etc., American Modeling Teachers Association (AMTA) | Always - we are very small (70 students from 6-12), so all classes are created/taught by a small number of teachers. We integrate content whenever possible, and are focused on project-based learning. | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Developed new standards-aligned units, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations, Developed rubrics based on the standards | Continue to create a Scope and Sequence aligned with NGSS. | Never | 3-4 elective science projects each year - one bio, one chem, one physics, one earth | N/A | Yes - MG uses ICS | No | Yes - integrated | Yes - still under development | ||||||||
97 | Sharon J11 | 2 | No | CESA | Networking meetings | It varies by grade level, about 60 minutes per week isolated science K-4 (integrated topics in ELA)and 50 per day 5-8 | Yes | Mostly | Amplify, Mystery Science, FOSS | Amplify, FOSS, APEX | YES! Looking at Amplify STEM for 6-8 | Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials | More rigorous materials | Sometimes | Yes, related to achievement | Yes - in LMT | Makerspace/STEM lab in LMT | Yes | ||||||||
98 | Mt Horeb School District | 2 | Yes | School or district provided learning, Online communities (e.g. Facebook AP or subject groups) | 30 min or less every other day | Yes | Mostly | Mystery Science | No, we have been very happy with Mystery Science. | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Adopted new, standards-aligned curriculum materials, Developed new standards-aligned units, Revised assessments, Brought in more student sensemaking of phenomena, Support more student talk/dialogue | We are currently working on revising assessments and units. | Sometimes | Yes, we have an equity team. | No, we do have Genius Hour and outside STEM programs. | No | No, but working towards it. | ||||||||||
99 | McFarland | 2 | No | 35 - 40 min, 3 times per week | No | Locally created lessons/units, Mystery Science, Former Pearson Resources | No. It is not in the curriculum review cycle | Developed new standards-aligned units | To make sure we are covering the grade level standards with the units we have developed. | Sometimes | N/A | Yes. Our district goal is to reduce disparities in social-emotional and academic outcomes for students of color, students with disabilities, linguistically diverse students, and economically disadvantaged students, to the point where outcomes reflect our District’s demographic characteristics. | Yes.It is seperate. | Yes. It is separate. | Yes. Right now we are reporting on Science ELOs (Essential Learning Outcomes) (adapted from the NGSS Scientific and Engineering Practices) 1. Asking questions, then planning and carrying out investigations 2. Developing and using models 3. Analyzing and interpreting data/ computational thinking 4. Engaging in argument from evidence/ Constructing explanations 5. Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information | |||||||||||
100 | Madison Country Day School | 2 | Yes | School or district provided learning, Networking with building-level colleagues, WSST - Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers, NSTA - National Science Teaching Association, Workshops or meetings from other non-profit partners (e.g. nature centers, community groups) | 55 min 6/8 days | No | Locally created lessons/units | Locally created lessons/units | Locally created lessons/units | Yes, in some areas. We are working on aligning our curriculum with the IB requirements for primary years (PK-4) and middle years (5-10). | Re-developed or created a new scope and sequence, Have students writing claim, evidence, reasoning explanations, Developed rubrics based on the standards | Mapping the NGSS onto the IB requirements. | Rarely | Integrated Science (bio/chem/physics) for 9th & 10th grade. Then they choose at least one from Bio, Chem, Physics, Environmental Science to take for 2 years in 11/12. | Everyone takes the same science in 9/10 | yes, but I'm not entirely clear on the details. | Yes, lower school has a STEAM class that is a collaboration between science & art. We are currently looking to hire a new teacher for MS who will teach a Design class in the Makerspace, separate from science. | Yes, see above. The makerspace supports science classes at all levels. | For middle years (5-10): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-3NXIzsfJQB-qV3sOa3CPPAGydlR9ODS/view?usp=sharing |