ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAA
1
QuestionAnswerSentenceDocument link
2
Should Adirondack, Humphrey, and Mazatzal be linked to olivine and andesite?Yes43https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2005_1413
3
Should we consider "Humphries" as an alias for "Humphrey"? Or separate target?It is the same target25-26, 32https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2005_2064
4
Should we include terms like "Haskin Ridge" and "Husband Hill" as Targets? (Sometimes they are observing targets or stated to have properties; sometimes they are mentioned as localities.)These are regions or areas, but in this case they are being used as a target with a bunch of individual rocks9, 16, 21https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2006_1989
5
Same question hereSame answer. I don't see the harm in including them as targets24https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2006_2057
6
Should we include "Low Ridge" as a Target?Yes if above areas are treated as targets31https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2007_1122
7
Should Husband Hill be marked as containing illmenite? Here it is based on unnamed rocks.Yes40https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2006_2087
8
Similar example with West Spur and goethiteYes71https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2006_2087
9
Should named localities "inherit" properties associated with a Target at that locality? (example: Wishstone has plagioclase; these rocks are on Husband Hill; should Husband Hill be marked as "contains plagioclase"?)Yes15https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2006_1989
10
Similar example with Husband Hill and chromite (based on Targets Independence and Assemblee)Yes42https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2006_2087
11
Similar example with West Spur and WishstoneYes66, 68https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2006_2176
12
Should named rocks "inherit" properties associated with a Target on the rock? (example: Ebenezer vs. Ratchit2 (sentence 59); Koolik2 vs. Uchben (sentence 61)I woud say yes59, 61https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2006_1816
13
14
Should we include "Backstay contains plagioclase" (sent. 46) and olivine (sent. 50) when this abstract refers to lab experiments from a Backstay composition with water added?I would say No46, 50https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2008_1802
15
Should oxides (Na2O, MgO, etc.) in Table 1 be marked as "contains" for Humphrey, Mazatzal, and Adirondack? Here is the source PDF: https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2008/pdf/1965.pdfYes72https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2008_1965
16
Same question for oxides in Table 1 and targets Irvine and Backstay. Here is the source PDF: https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2008/pdf/2219.pdfYes34https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2008_2219
17
Same question for oxides in Table 1 for Adirondack. Here is the source PDF: https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2009/pdf/1879.pdfNo here, because it is experimental results -> Update: these are measurements so we will keep them29https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2009_1879
18
Should West Spur and Husband Hill inherit "layered" and "clastic" and "altered" from Clovis class?Yes34-35https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2009_2160
19
Should Fastball be said to contain oxides and carbonates?No here, because it is experimental results23https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2010_1238
20
Should Fastball be said to contain olivine and pyroxene?Yes35https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2010_1238
21
Should Fastball be said to contain olivine and orthopyroxene (opx)?No here, because it is experimental results49https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2010_1238
22
Should we mark Backstay as containing Cl and S, and should we mark Humphrey as containing olivine, plagioclase, pyroxene, and glass? (this is a lab study recreating Backstay/Humphrey compositions)
No again, because it is experimental results
16https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2010_1774
23
Should we consider "glass" to be a Mineral or a Property?Technically glass is not a mineral (actually a liquid), so make it a property16https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2010_1774
24
Should we mark Humphrey as containing olivine, orthopyroxene, pigeonite, and plagioclase? (this is a lab study recreating Backstay/Humphrey compositions)No again, because it is experimental results30https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2010_1774
25
Should we mark Backstay as containing MgCl2, MgF2, CaSO4, Cl, F, and S?No again, because it is experimental results39, 46, 53https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2010_1774
26
Should we mark Fastball as containing nontronite, hematite, chlorite? (lab study)Yes, because describing the rock here53https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2011_2072
27
Should we mark Fastball as containing amphibloe, chlorite, feldspar?Yes, because describing the rock here54https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2011_2072
28
Should "basalt" and "trachybasalt" (etc.) be considered a Mineral or a Property?We don't have a category for rock (which is composed on many minerals), so I guess property11https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2013_1265
29
Should we mark Irvine as having "spectra" given that this is talking about synthesized samples?No, because it is experimental results58https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2013_1543
30
Should we mark Irvine thoughout as a Target when it is used to refer to a lab synthesized sample akin to Irvine?No again, because it is experimental results22, 29, 31, 39, etc.https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2013_1543
31
Is "silica" sufficient to mark, or should it be "opaline silica"?Opaline silica includes silica, but it is amophous (yes, include modifier)8, 9https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2013_1612
32
33
Should we mark Comanche as having Mg, Fe, carbonates, silicate, and basaltic? (it is "modeled as..")Yes16https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2014_1739
34
Is it sufficient to mark "silicate" or should we use "amorphous silicate"?prefer amorphous silicate57-58https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2014_1739
35
If augite and olivine compositions were "subtracted" from Humphrey's RAT composition, should we mark Humphrey as containing augite and olivine?Yes65-66https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2016_2160
36
Many papers refer to hydrothermal or silica features found "near" or "adjacent" to Home Plate. Should we mark Home Plate as containing them, or omit because it describes nearby (unnamed) features, not Home Plate itself?I would identofy them with Hom Plate7, 23, 40, 41https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2016_2827
37
The text refers to the "Avg Humphrey" and "Avg Mazatzal" composition; should we mark these as Targets (would come up on a search for Humphrey or Mazatzal respectively)?Yes53https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2017_1608
38
Should we mark Home Plate as containing "opaline silica" when it appeared "adjacent to" Home plate? (This is mentioned in many abstracts)Yes7https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2017_2879
39
Should we mark "Homeplate" as containing Ge (sent. 12) when it is in "some samples around Homeplate" (sent. 15)?Yes12, 15https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2018_2259
40
Should we mark "Home Plate" as having properties "windabraded", "vesicular" and "basalt" when this is referring to rocks "around" Home Plate (sent. 29)?Yes31https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2018_2367
41
Likewise, should we include these elements and minerals for Home Plate?Yes11https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2020_2915
42
Should Home Plate contain Ti since Gertrude Weiss does ("near")?Yes - being inclusive53, 54https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2020_2915
43
Should Home Plate contain SiO2, Fe?(Assuming yes)26https://ml.jpl.nasa.gov/mte/brat/#/mer-a/all-jsre-reviewed+properties-v2/2008_2208
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100