Probable Cause debates -- Yale

	A	C	F	G	I	L	O
1
2
3
4
5
6	Pro Constructive	Con Rebuttal	Pro Summary		Con Summary	Pro FF	Con FF
7
8	RS is subjective	90% warrantless, same	Decrease the amount of		Won't get a warrant because	Schools Safer Under PR
9	-- RS based on		warrantless searches (only exigences)		searches are voluntary	(a) SROS will be more careful
10	previous experiences	Racism perpetuated -- 5X stops				about why and who they are
11		30% of the time even with PC	Racism the root cause of violence		Students won't know about PC	arresting -- need to use evidence
12	Johnson -- Race legally				or why it is better	in a search
13	permissible as a factor	NC -- AA searched 2X much, but	Ngurente -- Race can be used for RS
14		more contraband with whites			We solve for root of violence -- trust	(b) PC less prone to racial bias	90% consent
15	X -7X the searches		Cal Western Law Review -- Under PC, 89%		for school adminsiitratoin	because of individualized suspicion
16	in minority school districts	Security outweighs	of searches corroborated
17					Kall -- safety leads to trust	Johnson-- SC allows racial bias	With PC still perpetuated
18	With PC officers need	SQ -- SROS will increase	Under RS - can't use generalizations		and acievement		still searched
19	corrobarating evidence				more abuse of drugs	Racism is the root of violence
20		SROS won't decrease	No comparative substance abuse -- not
21	Should have individualized		show it is a problem		All schools don't have surveillance	Not show how much violence will	RS creates perception
22	suspicion	says can search if undocumented			Scope -- big impact	increase	Kall, criminalization
23	Individualized Suspicion Key	not that can search on race	Restorative justice -- any change
24			in policies signals hope		Harvard LR -- education will decrease	More social movements*	No hope, no security
25	Impacts						Complacency turns this
26							people see it as a failure, give up hope
27	1 -- Cycle of violence
28	internalizing racism
29	leads to aggressive behavior
30
31	2 -- Youth disengagement
32	SROS bad
33	RS subjective
34	Can arrest for anytihng
35	RS means arrest for petty
36	crimes
37
38	C2: Restorative Justice	Con Rebuttal Continued
39
40	Link	Assumes PC works
41	1 -- Makes safety reform ppossible
42		They are making this up
43	2 -- Increasing legitimacy --	There is no link evidence
44	PC would legitimate claims
45		People willl see PC is a failure
46	Schools in Col Restorative justice
47	works	Creates complacency
48
49	Doyle -- young offenders	More punitive
50	incarcerated
51	more likely to go to prison
52	themsselves if their parents do
53
54
55		Con Constructive		Pro Rebuttall
56
57		90% consent, not constrained		yes, what warrantless searches are
58				not all the searches
59		Safety -- RS deters drug use		PC higher standard, won't consent
60		Tiller -- students think they won't
61		be caught, warrant requirement link		Marshall College -- PC increases trust
62
63		(1) -- violence in firearams in schools		More careful because more likely to keep the evidence
64				(huh?)
65		(2) - Education -- 2011
66				RS -- 4X as likely to be searched than
67		General security measures will increase		in a world of PC
68				This solve STPP
69		(a) School officials PERCEIVE LESS ACCESS
70		will ust metal detectors, drug sniffing dogs		Securitization now
71				68% of schools have SROS
72		(b) Conducted without restraint
73		TLO, ACTON, EARLS		Have metal detectors (11%)
74
75		Widespread securtiy measures cause		Wilely -- 79% of students have positive
76		STTP		impacts with police officers
77
78		Wilely -- policy legitimacy
79
80		Strict security measures + ZTPs
81		lead to imprisonment
82
83		suspensions cause academic problems
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100