ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXY
1
This tool can be downloaded, filled out, and used together with the Responsible Research Practices Self-Assessment. This file is View Only. Please click File and 'Download' to obtain an editable version for your team.
2
3
4
5
Transparent Reporting Reflect-List
6
7
Section/TopicItem #DescriptionSelf-Assessment
8
9
Title and Abstract
10
Title1Identify the study as developing and/or validating a multivariable prediction model, the target population, and the outcome to be predicted.
11
Abstract2Provide a summary of objectives, study design, setting, participants, sample size, predictors, outcome, statistical analysis, results, and conclusions.
12
Introduction
13
Background and Objectives3aExplain the medical context (including whether diagnostic or prognostic) and rationale for developing or validating the multivariable prediction model, including references to existing models. This includes an explanation the rationale behind the intended use, the choice of patients, and the defintion of outcome.
14
3bSpecify the objectives, including whether the study describes the development or validation of the model or both.
15
Methods
16
Source of Data4aDescribe the study design or source of data (e.g., randomized trial, cohort, or registry data), separately for the development and validation data sets, if applicable.
17
4bSpecify the key study dates, including start of accrual; end of accrual; and, if applicable, end of follow-up.
18
Participants5aSpecify key elements of the study setting (e.g., primary care, secondary care, general population) including number and location of centres.
19
5bDescribe eligibility criteria for participants.
20
5cGive details of treatments received, if relevant.
21
Outcome6aClearly define the outcome that is predicted by the prediction model, including how and when assessed.
22
6bReport any actions to blind assessment of the outcome to be predicted.
23
Predictors7aClearly define all predictors used in developing or validating the multivariable prediction model, including how and when they were measured.
24
7bReport any actions to blind assessment of predictors for the outcome and other predictors.
25
Sample Size8Explain how the study size was arrived at.
26
Missing Data9Describe how missing data were handled (e.g., complete-case analysis, single imputation, multiple imputation) with details of any imputation method.
27
Statistical Analysis Methods10aDescribe how predictors were handled in the analyses.
28
10bSpecify type of model, all model-building procedures (including any predictor selection), and method for internal validation.
29
10cFor validation, describe how the predictions were calculated.
30
10dSpecify all measures used to assess model performance and, if relevant, to compare multiple models.
31
10eDescribe any model updating (e.g., recalibration) arising from the validation, if done.
32
Risk Groups11Provide details on how risk groups were created, if done.
33
Development vs. Validation12For validation, identify any differences from the development data in setting, eligibility criteria, outcome, and predictors.
34
Results
35
Participants13aDescribe the flow of participants through the study, including the number of participants with and without the outcome and, if applicable, a summary of the follow-up time. A diagram may be helpful.
36
13bDescribe the characteristics of the participants (basic demographics, clinical features, available predictors), including the number of participants with missing data for predictors and outcome.
37
13cFor validation, show a comparison with the development data of the distribution of important variables (demographics, predictors and outcome).
38
Model Development14aSpecify the number of participants and outcome events in each analysis.
39
14bIf done, report the unadjusted association between each candidate predictor and outcome.
40
Model Specification15aPresent the full prediction model to allow predictions for individuals (i.e., all regression coefficients, and model intercept or baseline survival at a given time point).
41
15bExplain how to the use the prediction model.
42
Model Performance16Report performance measures (with CIs) for the prediction model.
43
Model-updating17If done, report the results from any model updating (i.e., model specification, model performance).
44
Discussion
45
Limitations18Discuss any limitations of the study (such as nonrepresentative sample, few events per predictor, missing data).
46
Interpretation19aFor validation, discuss the results with reference to performance in the development data, and any other validation data.
47
19bGive an overall interpretation of the results, considering objectives, limitations, results from similar studies, and other relevant evidence.
48
Implications20Discuss the potential clinical use of the model and implications for future research.
49
Other Information
50
Supplementary Information21Provide information about the availability of supplementary resources, such as study protocol, Web calculator, and data sets.
51
Funding22Give the source of funding and the role of the funders for the present study.
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100