ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
Paper Title01_02_03_04_05_06_07_
2
Reviewer Initials:
3
Evaluation Criteria
4
Topic
5
Support
6
Appropriateness for IASSIST Quarterly
7
Organization (also flow)
8
Conventions (grammar, punctuation, spelling)
9
Overall Comments
10
Total Score000000000000
11
12
13
Rubric:
14
Criteria4321
15
TopicPaper is focused and reflects original and insightful ideasPaper is focused and includes relevant but not insightful or original ideasPaper is focused on topic but ideas are loosely relatedPaper addresses topic poorly
16
SupportPersuasive arguments and use of evidence or description of case studySupports main points with developed ideas. Some examples are not concrete or need elaboration.Supports arguments but underdeveloped evidence.Little or no support/evidence
17
Appropriateness for IQPaper topic fits target audience for IQPaper topic is within scope of IASSIST's interestsPaper topic is relevant to IASSIST but not a main topic of interestPaper topic is not within IQ or IASSIST's scope
18
OrganizationEffectively organizes ideas to support argumentOrganized overall but some revisions necessary Organization supports argument but needs major revisionsLittle to no organization
19
Conventions (grammar, punctuation, spelling, flow)Uses correct conventions with very few errorsUses correct conventions, but several errors Contains frequent errors. Needs revision.Many errors making comprehension difficult
20
Overall CommentsAnything worth noting can be helpful when scores between papers are close.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100