ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
Institution: Dominican UniversitySecond Review Finding Second Review FeedbackThird Review Finding Third Review FeedbackFourth Review Finding Fourth Review Feedback
2
Program(s) and Pathway(s): Multiple Subject- Student Teaching, Residency, Intern and Education Specialist MMSN - Student Teaching, Residency, Intern
3
Link to Submission: https://sites.google.com/dominican.edu/cctcaccreditation?usp=sharing
4
Initial Review
5
Table 3.1 - 7.5/U7.5 Foundational SkillsIntroducedPracticedAssessed
6
The information provided in 3.1 indicates that the concepts are clearly introduced/included in coursework
(Indicate Y or N)		The information provided in 3.1 indicates that the concepts are clearly practiced by candidates in coursework or clinical practice
(Indicate Y or N) 		The information provided in 3.1 indicates that candidates are assessed on these concepts
(Indicate Y or N)		If no is indicated on any of the previous three columns, please comment on what is missing or unclear.Reviewer Instructions
For any element that was not addressed in the initial review, review institution's response.

Select Yes or No from the drop down menu. If feedback is fully addressed, select Yes. If additional information is needed, select No and use Column G to provide additional feedback. 		Reviewer Instructions
If the response is not sufficient, please provide additional feedback.

If the response addresses the feedback, no additional feedback is needed.		Reviewer Instructions
For any element that was not addressed in the second review, review institution's response.

Select Yes or No from the drop down menu. If feedback is fully addressed, select Yes. If additional information is needed, select No and use Column I to provide additional feedback. 		Reviewer Instructions
If the response is not sufficient, please provide additional feedback.

If the response addresses the feedback, no additional feedback is needed.		Reviewer Instructions
For any element that was not addressed in the third review, review institution's response.

Select Yes or No from the drop down menu. If feedback is fully addressed, select Yes. If additional information is needed, select No and use Column K to provide additional feedback. 		Reviewer Instructions
If the response is not sufficient, please provide additional feedback.

If the response addresses the feedback, no additional feedback is needed.
7
a. print concepts, including letters of the alphabetYesYesNoI: I: I: I:
8
P: P: P: P:
9
A: Reviewers did not see the evidence as to how the candidates will be assessed in this element. A link to a rubric, metric, or standard of measurement for the assignment/activity was not found. YesA: A: A:
10
b. phonological awareness, including phonemic awarenessYesYesNoI: I: I: I:
11
P: P: P: P:
12
A: Reviewers did not see the evidence as to how the candidates will be assessed in this element. Evidence of a rubric, metric, or standard of measurement for the assignment/activity was not found. yesA: A: A:
13
c. phonics, spelling, and word recognition, including letter-sound, spelling-sound, and sound-symbol correspondencesYesYesNoI: I: I: I:
14
P: P: P: P:
15
A: Reviewers did not see the evidence as to how the candidates will be assessed in this element. A link to a rubric, metric, or standard of measurement for the assignment/activity was not found. NOA: Reviewers were unable to open 2 links. 1. Progress Monitoring Florm and 2. Final Evaluation. A message of "access denied" pops NoA: Reviewers were able to open the links. Evidence of each element of TPE 7.5 was not found in either form.YesA:
16
d. decoding and encoding, including morphological awarenessNoNoNoI: Reviewers did not find evidence of the substance (slides, website, video, chapter reading(s), articles, etc) that is being introduced for this element. YesI: I: I:
17
P: Reviewers did not find the evidence of the discussion prompts for this elementYesP: P: P:
18
A: Reviewers did not find evidence of how a candidate's ability to undertsand and teach this element is being assessed. NoA:NoA: Reviewers were able to open the links. Evidence of each element of TPE 7.5 was not found in either form.YesA:
19
e. text reading fluency, including accuracy, prosody (expression), and rate (as an indicator of automaticity)YesYesNoI: I: I: I:
20
P: P: P: P:
21
A: Reviewers did not find evidence of how a candidate's ability to undertsand and teach this element is being assessed. YesA: A: A:
22
f. instruction that is structured and organized as well as direct, systematic, and explicitNoNoNoI: Reviewers did not find evidence of the substance (slides, website, video, chapter reading(s), articles, etc) that is being introduced for this element. YesI: I: I:
23
P: Reviewers did not find the evidence of the discussion prompts for this elementYesP: P: P:
24
A: Reviewers did not find evidence of how a candidate's ability to undertsand and teach this element is being assessed. NoA: Reviewers were unable to open 2 links. 1. Progress Monitoring Florm and 2. Final Evaluation. A message of "access denied" pops NoA: Reviewers were able to open the links. Evidence of each element of TPE 7.5 was not found in either form.YesA:
25
g. connected, decodable textNoNoNoI: Reviewers did not find evidence of how connected text is introduced.YesI: I: I:
26
P: Reviewers did not find evidence of how connected text is being practiced.YesP: P: P:
27
A: Reviewers did not find evidence of how a candidate's ability to undertsand and teach this element is being assessed. NoA: Reviewers were unable to open 2 links. 1. Progress Monitoring Florm and 2. Final Evaluation. A message of "access denied" pops NoA: Reviewers were able to open the links. Evidence of each element of TPE 7.5 was not found in either form.YesA:
28
h. Provide instruction in text reading fluency that emphasizes spelling and syllable patterns, semantics, morphology, and syntax.YesNoNoI: Reviewers would have liked to see evidence of the lecture substance (slides, website, video, chapter reading(s), articles, etc) that is being introduced for this element. YesI: I: I:
29
P: Reviewers did not find evidence of role playing that includes text reading fluency that emphasizes spelling and syllable patterns, semantics, morphology, and syntax.NoP: Reviewers are unable to determne how a discussion on pre and post-test addressing teaching candidates how to Provide instruction in text reading fluency that emphasizes spelling and syllable patterns, semantics, morphology, and syntax". Are their questions that the institutuion is using in the discussion with each acandidate to make that determonation. NoP: Reviewers did not find new evidence for Practice of 7.5.hYesP:
30
A: Reviewers did not find evidence of how a candidate's ability to undertsand and teach this element is being assessed. NoA: Reviewers are unable to determine how retaking a pottest addresses assessing candidates in their ability to "Provide instruction in text reading fluency that emphasizes spelling and syllable patterns, semantics, morphology, and syntax." ALSO- Reviewers were unable to open 2 links. 1. Progress Monitoring Florm and 2. Final Evaluation. A message of "access denied" pops NoA: Reviewers were able to open the links. Evidence of each element of TPE 7.5 was not found in either form.YesA:
31
i. Advance students’ progress in the elements of foundational skills, language, and cognitive skills that support them as they read and write increasingly complex disciplinary texts with comprehension and effective expression.YesYesNoI: I: I: I:
32
P: P: P: P:
33
A: Reviewers did not find evidence of how the program is assessing candidate's ability to understand and teach to advance students’ progress in the elements of foundational skills, language, and cognitive skills that support them as they read and write increasingly complex disciplinary texts with comprehension and effective expression.
NoA: Reviewers were unable to open 2 links. 1. Progress Monitoring Florm and 2. Final Evaluation. A message of "access denied" pops NoA: Reviewers were able to open the links. Evidence of each element of TPE 7.5 was not found in either form.YesA:
34
Standard 7a. Foundational Skills: English Learners

Reviewers can find information on 7a in Section 3.2 of the institution's submission.		The evidence contained in the literacy coursework indicates program is aligned to standard 7a as it relates to multilingual and English Learner students. (Indicate Y or N)If the response in the previous column is no, please indicate what is missing or unclear related to this aspect of standard 7a.Reviewer Instructions
For any element that was not addressed in the initial review, review institution's response.

Select Yes or No from the drop down menu. If feedback is fully addressed, select Yes. If additional information is needed, select No and use Column G to provide additional feedback. 		Reviewer Instructions
If the response is not sufficient, please provide additional feedback.

If the response addresses the feedback, no additional feedback is needed.		Reviewer Instructions
For any element that was not addressed in the second review, review institution's response.

Select Yes or No from the drop down menu. If feedback is fully addressed, select Yes. If additional information is needed, select No and use Column I to provide additional feedback. 		Reviewer Instructions
If the response is not sufficient, please provide additional feedback.

If the response addresses the feedback, no additional feedback is needed.		Reviewer Instructions
For any element that was not addressed in thethird review, review institution's response.

Select Yes or No from the drop down menu. If feedback is fully addressed, select Yes. If additional information is needed, select No and use Column K to provide additional feedback. 		Reviewer Instructions
If the response is not sufficient, please provide additional feedback.

If the response addresses the feedback, no additional feedback is needed.
35
Standard 7a: The program also includes evidence-based means of teaching foundational skills to multilingual and English learner students while they are simultaneously developing oral English language proficiency, and in some cases literacy skills in an additional language. The program teaches candidates to plan foundational skills instruction based on students’ previous literacy experiences in their home languages and to differentiate instruction using guidance from the ELA/ELD Framework, including knowledge of cross-language transfer between the home languages and English.NoReviewers did not find the program's links for this standard. We were unable to determine where the proram included evidence-based means of teaching foundational skills to multilingual and English learner students while they are simultaneously developing oral English language proficiency, and in some cases literacy skills in an additional language. The program teaches candidates to plan foundational skills instruction based on students’ previous literacy experiences in their home languages and to differentiate instruction using guidance from the ELA/ELD Framework, including knowledge of cross-language transfer between the home languages and English.Yes
36
The feedback on this sheet is provided for all programs and pathways listed on Row 2 of this sheet.The feedback above is for all programs and pathways (Indicate Y or N)General Comments:
37
Yes
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100