Distribute Ignite

	B	C	D	E	F	G	H
1
2	The distribution of ignite damage according to contribution rate of critical damage dealed by each players
3
4	Problems with current distribution methods (AS-IS)
5	1. not an correct value
6	2. hard to analyze
7	3. be indistinguishable from the ranks (ex, If another mage dies early in the combat, will happen all mage DPS(ignite) loss)
8
9	2,3 are problems derived from 1
10
11
12
13	Improvement proposal (TO-BE)
14	the distribution of ignite damage according to contribution rate of critical damage dealed by each players
15
16	advantage			disadvantage
17	1. be relatively correct			1. It's not a perfectly correct value (because of different from Ignite formula)
18	2. be easy to analyze			2. The possibility of additional traffic due to the addition of a formula
19	3. discriminative Rank
20
21
22	See details
23	reference log	https://classic.warcraftlogs.com/reports/CYJNvWV1gT6Xw289#fight=1093&type=damage-done&sourceclass=Mage
24	ID		Total fire critical damage	Percentage	Distribute Ignite (AS-IS)	Distribute Ignite (TO-BE)	Remark
25	파반	A	36,294	27.37%	10,400	17,080	fulltime alive
26	Frostfire	B	28,300	21.34%	10,400	13,318	fulltime alive
27	Lucyxx	C	18,400	13.88%	10,400	8,659	6:26 death
28	라니라니고라니	D	22,900	17.27%	10,400	10,777	6:19 death
29	Lemonade	E	13,300	10.03%	10,400	6,259	5:11 death
30	백실장	F	13,400	10.11%	10,400	6,306	4:48 death
31		TOTAL	132,594	100.00%	62,400	62,400
32		Total Ignite damage	62,400
33
34
35		Total fire critical damage		Fireball + Scorch + Fire Blast + Pyroblast + Flamestrike etc...
36			AS-IS	Total Ignite / Number of mage
37			TO-BE	Total Ignite * Percentage (contribution to total fire critical damage)
38
39	Fireball detail log
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100