Motorcycle Slide Index.xlsx

	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I	J	K	L	M	N	O
1			means paper was checked
2
3	REFERENCE	Author	Year	Paper	Drag factor low range	Drag factor Average	Drag factor high range	speed	drop?	Tumbling?	Method	Surface	Motorcycle type	Special conditions	Notes

4	11	DiTallo, M.	2020	“3 Different Methodologies for Determining the Drag Factor for Motorcycles Sliding on Their Sides"	0.28 (Clamp test), 0.39 (Dragged lateral, tries trailing)				Yes	No	Dragged and Clamp test	Asphalt - sharp	2000 Yamaha R6 with Frame Sliders	1 Sport bike with frame sliders
5	4	Carter, Enderle, Gambardella, Trester	1996	SAE 961017 Measurement of Motorcycle Slide Coefficients		0.57		30 mph	Yes	No	Dropped from upright position in test fixture - left side	Asphalt	Cruiser 1981 Kawasaki KZ440A LTD	Light damage - accessory backrest/rack installed
6	4	Carter, Enderle, Gambardella, Trester	1996	SAE 961017 Measurement of Motorcycle Slide Coefficients		0.66		30 mph	Yes	No	Dropped from upright position in test fixture - right side	Asphalt	Cruiser 1981 Kawasaki KZ440A LTD	Light damage - accessory backrest/rack installed
7	4	Carter, Enderle, Gambardella, Trester	1996	SAE 961017 Measurement of Motorcycle Slide Coefficients		0.91		30 mph	Yes	No	Dropped from upright position in test fixture - right side	Dirt	Cruiser 1981 Kawasaki KZ440A LTD	Light damage - accessory backrest/rack installed
8	4	Carter, Enderle, Gambardella, Trester	1996	SAE 961017 Measurement of Motorcycle Slide Coefficients		0.59		60 mph	Yes	No	Dropped from upright position in test fixture - right side	Asphalt	Cruiser 1982 Yamaha XJ650 Maxim	Light damage
9	4	Carter, Enderle, Gambardella, Trester	1996	SAE 961017 Measurement of Motorcycle Slide Coefficients		0.67		30 mph	Yes	No	Dropped from upright position in test fixture - left side	Asphalt	Cruiser 1982 Yamaha XJ650 Maxim	Moderate damage
10	4	Carter, Enderle, Gambardella, Trester	1996	SAE 961017 Measurement of Motorcycle Slide Coefficients		1.19		30 mph	Yes	No	Dropped from upright position in test fixture - right side	Dirt	Cruiser 1982 Yamaha XJ650 Maxim
11	4	Carter, Enderle, Gambardella, Trester	1996	SAE 961017 Measurement of Motorcycle Slide Coefficients		0.51		60 mph	Yes	No	Dropped from upright position in test fixture - right side	Asphalt	Cruiser 1984 Yamaha Virago 700	Light damage
12	4	Carter, Enderle, Gambardella, Trester	1996	SAE 961017 Measurement of Motorcycle Slide Coefficients		0.62		30 mph	Yes	No	Dropped from upright position in test fixture - left side	Asphalt	Cruiser 1984 Yamaha Virago 700	Light damage
13	4	Carter, Enderle, Gambardella, Trester	1996	SAE 961017 Measurement of Motorcycle Slide Coefficients		0.83		30 mph	Yes	No	Dropped from upright position in test fixture - left side	Gravel	Cruiser 1984 Yamaha Virago 700	Light damage
14	7	Bartlett, W.	2007	Motorcycle Slide-to-Stop Tests: IPTM Data through 2006		1.05					Drop test	Grassy Soil	Harley Davidson Sportster	1 test
15	11	DiTallo, M.	2019	“3 Different Methodologies for Determining the Drag Factor for Motorcycles Sliding on Their Sides"	0.35, 0.54				Yes	No	Dragged and Clamp Test.	Asphalt - sharp	Moped	2 Mopeds tested. 1 drop test. 1 dragged.
16	11	DiTallo, M.	2020	“3 Different Methodologies for Determining the Drag Factor for Motorcycles Sliding on Their Sides"	0.43			41.1 mph	Yes	No	Release from a rear hydraulic lift (6in off the ground). The motorcycle lands on asphalt LATERALLY. (Drop Test)	Asphalt - sharp	Motocross	1 Motocross bike, drop tested
17	5	Medwell, C.	1997	SAE 970963		0.28		50 mph	Yes	No	released from platform on the side of a truck	Asphalt	Sport 1992 Kawasaki ZX-7 Ninja	Fully Faired, left side down	1 MC that had been involved in single vehicle accident prior to tests. Repairs were made prior to testing - 4 tests: 3 on right side, 1 on left, 2 tests were asphalt then grass, left side test involved releasing the MC backwards Tests 3&4 corrected for an error resulting in 0.28 to 0.38 range
18	5	Medwell, C.	1997	SAE 970963		0.38		50 mph	Yes	No	released from platform on the side of a truck	Asphalt	Sport 1992 Kawasaki ZX-7 Ninja	Fully Faired, right side down	1 MC that had been involved in single vehicle accident prior to tests. Repairs were made prior to testing - 4 tests: 3 on right side, 1 on left, 2 tests were asphalt then grass, left side test involved releasing the MC backwards. Tests 3&4 corrected for an error resulting in 0.28 to 0.38 range
19	5	Medwell, C.	1997	SAE 970963		0.4		50 mph	Yes	No	released from platform on the side of a truck	Asphalt -end on grass	Sport 1992 Kawasaki ZX-7 Ninja	Fully Faired, right side down	1 MC that had been involved in single vehicle accident prior to tests. Repairs were made prior to testing - 4 tests: 3 on right side, 1 on left, 2 tests were asphalt then grass, left side test involved releasing the MC backwards
20	5	Medwell, C.	1997	SAE 970963		0.45		50 mph	Yes	No	released from platform on the side of a truck	Asphalt -end on grass	Sport 1992 Kawasaki ZX-7 Ninja	Fully Faired, right side down	1 MC that had been involved in single vehicle accident prior to tests. Repairs were made prior to testing - 4 tests: 3 on right side, 1 on left, 2 tests were asphalt then grass, left side test involved releasing the MC backwards
21	5	Medwell, C.	1997	SAE 970963	0.55		0.78	33 mph	No	No	Calculated for grass portion of first 2 tests	Grass	Sport 1992 Kawasaki ZX-7 Ninja	Fully Faired, right side down	Not directly measured. Calcd by authors for grass portion of slide for first 2 tests (right side down) that slide from pavement to grass
22	10	Peck, L., Focha, W., Gloekler, T.	2014	Motorcycle Sliding Friction for Accident Investigation	0.36	0.45	0.53	Track speeds	Yes	No	Track crashes monitored by GPS	15 crashes on Asphalt race track	sport bike	Frame sliders - authors conclude that sliders do not lower drag factor they INCREASE it
23	10	Peck, L., Focha, W., Gloekler, T.	2014	Motorcycle Sliding Friction for Accident Investigation		0.45		Track speeds	Yes	No	Track crashes monitored by GPS	1 crash involved sliding on asphalt & dirt no change in drag factor	sport bike	Frame sliders - authors conclude that sliders do not lower drag factor they INCREASE it
24	10	Peck, L., Focha, W., Gloekler, T.	2014	Motorcycle Sliding Friction for Accident Investigation	0.4	0.48	0.56	Track speeds	Yes	No	Controlled crash front wheel towed, bike released to fall	Asphalt training facility	sport bike	Frame sliders - authors conclude that sliders do not lower drag factor they INCREASE it
25	10	Peck, L., Focha, W., Gloekler, T.	2014	Motorcycle Sliding Friction for Accident Investigation	0.61		1.11	Track speeds	Yes	No	Track crashes monitored by GPS	2 crashes on dirt	sport bike	Frame sliders - authors conclude that sliders do not lower drag factor they INCREASE it
26	7	Bartlett, W.	2007	Motorcycle Slide-to-Stop Tests: IPTM Data through 2006	0.292	.374+/- .082	0.456	Varied	Yes	Varied	Drop Test	Varied Hard Surfaces (Concrete and Pavement)	Sport Motorcycles
27	11	DiTallo, M.	2017	“3 Different Methodologies for Determining the Drag Factor for Motorcycles Sliding on Their Sides"	0.28		0.61		Yes	No	Dragged, Drop Test, and Clamp Test	Asphalt - sharp	Sport Motorcycles	All 3 tests, looking only at Sport Motorcycles
28	8	McNally, B.	2007	Motorcycle Sliding Coefficient of Friction Tests	0.39		0.42		Yes	No	Towed upright then released	pavement	Sport Suzuki GSX 750 Katana		Higher decel initially when falling, then lower
29	3	Raftery, B.	1995	SAE 950197: Determination of the Drag Factor of a Fairing Equipped Motorcycle		0.26		53 mph	Yes	No	Dropped Boom held moto upright until release at speed	Asphalt	Sport Touring Suzuki Katana	Fully Faired	It appears that only 3 tests were run. Two with fairing and one without fairing
30	3	Raftery, B.	1995	SAE 950197: Determination of the Drag Factor of a Fairing Equipped Motorcycle		0.33		50 mph	Yes	No	Dropped Boom held moto upright until release at speed	Asphalt	Sport Touring Suzuki Katana	Unfaired	It appears that only 3 tests were run. Two with fairing and one without fairing
31	4	Carter, Enderle, Gambardella, Trester	1996	SAE 961017 Measurement of Motorcycle Slide Coefficients		0.41		30 mph	Yes	No	Dropped from upright position in test fixture - left side	Asphalt	Sports 1987 Yamaha FZ700T	Small fairing
32	4	Carter, Enderle, Gambardella, Trester	1996	SAE 961017 Measurement of Motorcycle Slide Coefficients		0.42		60 mph	Yes	No	Dropped from upright position in test fixture - right side	Asphalt	Sports 1987 Yamaha FZ700T	Small fairing
33	4	Carter, Enderle, Gambardella, Trester	1996	SAE 961017 Measurement of Motorcycle Slide Coefficients		0.45		30 mph	Yes	No	Dropped from upright position in test fixture - right side	Asphalt	Sports 1987 Yamaha FZ700T	Small fairing
34	1	Day, T. and Smith, J.	1984	SAE 840250: Friction Factors for Motorcycles Sliding on Various Surfaces		0.7		25 mph	No	No	Dragged	grassy earth	Standard (UJM) 67 Honda CB305, 73 Yamaha 550 special	1 test on Sodded Earth with right side of Honda
35	1	Day, T. and Smith, J.	1984	SAE 840250: Friction Factors for Motorcycles Sliding on Various Surfaces	0.68		0.79	25 mph	No	No	Dragged	gravel	Standard (UJM) 67 Honda CB305, 73 Yamaha 550 special	3 tests on gravel with right & left sides
36	1	Day, T. and Smith, J.	1984	SAE 840250: Friction Factors for Motorcycles Sliding on Various Surfaces	0.45		0.58	25 mph	No	No	Dragged	asphalt	Standard (UJM) 67 Honda CB305, 73 Yamaha 550 special	5 tests on asphalt with right & left sides	UJM = Universal Japanese motorcycle
37	11	DiTallo, M.	2018	“3 Different Methodologies for Determining the Drag Factor for Motorcycles Sliding on Their Sides"	0.28		0.6		Yes	No	Dragged, Drop Test, and Clamp Test	Asphalt - sharp	Touring	All 3 tests, looking only at Touring Motorcycles
38	4	Carter, Enderle, Gambardella, Trester	1996	SAE 961017 Measurement of Motorcycle Slide Coefficients		0.38		60 mph	Yes	No	Dropped from upright position in test fixture - left side	Asphalt	Touring 1985 Yamaha XV 1200 Venture	Fairing
39	4	Carter, Enderle, Gambardella, Trester	1996	SAE 961017 Measurement of Motorcycle Slide Coefficients		0.38		30 mph	Yes	No	Dropped from upright position in test fixture - right side	Asphalt	Touring 1985 Yamaha XV 1200 Venture	Fairing
40	4	Carter, Enderle, Gambardella, Trester	1996	SAE 961017 Measurement of Motorcycle Slide Coefficients		0.72		30 mph	Yes	No	Dropped from upright position in test fixture - right side	Gravel	Touring 1985 Yamaha XV 1200 Venture	Fairing
41	4	Carter, Enderle, Gambardella, Trester	1996	SAE 961017 Measurement of Motorcycle Slide Coefficients		0.4		60 mph	Yes	No	Dropped from upright position in test fixture - left side	Asphalt	UJM Standard 1981 Kawasaki KZ400	Damaged from previous crash
42	4	Carter, Enderle, Gambardella, Trester	1996	SAE 961017 Measurement of Motorcycle Slide Coefficients		0.49		30 mph	Yes	No	Dropped from upright position in test fixture - left side	Asphalt	UJM Standard 1981 Kawasaki KZ400	Damaged from previous crash
43	4	Carter, Enderle, Gambardella, Trester	1996	SAE 961017 Measurement of Motorcycle Slide Coefficients		0.42		60 mph	Yes	No	Dropped from upright position in test fixture - right side	Asphalt	UJM Standard 1984 Yamaha FJ1100	Fairing
44	4	Carter, Enderle, Gambardella, Trester	1996	SAE 961017 Measurement of Motorcycle Slide Coefficients		0.47		30 mph	Yes	No	Dropped from upright position in test fixture - left side	Asphalt	UJM Standard 1984 Yamaha FJ1100	Fairing
45	4	Carter, Enderle, Gambardella, Trester	1996	SAE 961017 Measurement of Motorcycle Slide Coefficients		0.54		60 mph	Yes	No	Dropped from upright position in test fixture - right side	Asphalt	UJM Standard 1988 Yamaha Radian	Light damage
46	4	Carter, Enderle, Gambardella, Trester	1996	SAE 961017 Measurement of Motorcycle Slide Coefficients		0.55		30 mph	Yes	No	Dropped from upright position in test fixture - left side	Asphalt	UJM Standard 1988 Yamaha Radian	Light damage
47	2	Lambourn	1991	SAE 910125 The Calculation of Motorcycle Speeds from Sliding Distances	0.54	0.6	0.66	6 mph	No	No	Dragged	Asphalt - course	UJM Standard Honda C90	left side	MCs used for multiple tests. Friction may have reduced slightly due to wear from prior tests
48	2	Lambourn	1991	SAE 910125 The Calculation of Motorcycle Speeds from Sliding Distances	0.36	0.505	0.65	23 - 50 mph	Yes	No	Dropped - slid off a low platform trailer	Asphalt - course	UJM Standard Honda C90	left side	MCs used for multiple tests. Friction may have reduced slightly due to wear from prior tests
49	2	Lambourn	1991	SAE 910125 The Calculation of Motorcycle Speeds from Sliding Distances	0.54	0.54	0.54	6 mph	No	No	Dragged	Asphalt - course	UJM Standard Honda C90	right side	MCs used for multiple tests. Friction may have reduced slightly due to wear from prior tests
50	2	Lambourn	1991	SAE 910125 The Calculation of Motorcycle Speeds from Sliding Distances	0.49	0.53	0.57	30 - 49 mph	Yes	No	Dropped - slid off a low platform trailer	Asphalt - course	UJM Standard Honda C90	right side	MCs used for multiple tests. Friction may have reduced slightly due to wear from prior tests
51	2	Lambourn	1991	SAE 910125 The Calculation of Motorcycle Speeds from Sliding Distances	0.46	0.52	0.58	6 mph	No	No	Dragged	Asphalt - course	UJM Standard Honda C90	right side	MCs used for multiple tests. Friction may have reduced slightly due to wear from prior tests
52	2	Lambourn	1991	SAE 910125 The Calculation of Motorcycle Speeds from Sliding Distances	0.5	0.56	0.62	25 - 57 mph	Yes	No	Dropped - upright position	Asphalt - course	UJM Standard Honda C90	right side	MCs used for multiple tests. Friction may have reduced slightly due to wear from prior tests
53	2	Lambourn	1991	SAE 910125 The Calculation of Motorcycle Speeds from Sliding Distances	0.49	0.52	0.55	6 mph	No	No	Dragged	Asphalt - course	UJM Standard Honda C90	left side	MCs used for multiple tests. Friction may have reduced slightly due to wear from prior tests
54	2	Lambourn	1991	SAE 910125 The Calculation of Motorcycle Speeds from Sliding Distances	0.49	0.51	0.53	25 - 57 mph	Yes	No	Dropped - upright position	Asphalt - course	UJM Standard Honda C90	left side	MCs used for multiple tests. Friction may have reduced slightly due to wear from prior tests
55	2	Lambourn	1991	SAE 910125 The Calculation of Motorcycle Speeds from Sliding Distances	0.26	0.295	0.33	6 mph	No	No	Dragged	Asphalt - fine textured	UJM Standard Honda CB750G (crash bars)	Crash bars - right side.	MCs used for multiple tests. Friction may have reduced slightly due to wear from prior tests
56	2	Lambourn	1991	SAE 910125 The Calculation of Motorcycle Speeds from Sliding Distances	0.25	0.3	0.35	21 - 49 mph	Yes	No	Dropped - slid off a low platform trailer	Asphalt - fine textured	UJM Standard Honda CB750G (crash bars)	Crash bars - right side. MCs used for multiple tests. Friction may have reduced slightly due to wear from prior tests	MCs used for multiple tests. Friction may have reduced slightly due to wear from prior tests
57	2	Lambourn	1991	SAE 910125 The Calculation of Motorcycle Speeds from Sliding Distances	0.26	0.28	0.3	6 mph	No	No	Dragged	Asphalt - fine textured	UJM Standard Honda CB750G (crash bars)	Crash bars - left side.	MCs used for multiple tests. Friction may have reduced slightly due to wear from prior tests
58	2	Lambourn	1991	SAE 910125 The Calculation of Motorcycle Speeds from Sliding Distances	0.25	0.275	0.3	32 - 50 mph	Yes	No	Dropped - slid off a low platform trailer	Asphalt - fine textured	UJM Standard Honda CB750G (crash bars)	Crash bars -left side.	MCs used for multiple tests. Friction may have reduced slightly due to wear from prior tests
59	8	McNally, B.	2007	Motorcycle Sliding Coefficient of Friction Tests	0.39		0.41		Yes	No	Towed upright then released	pavement	UJM Standard Honda CBR 360	Equipped with crash bars	Higher decel initially when falling, then lower
60	8	McNally, B.	2007	Motorcycle Sliding Coefficient of Friction Tests	0.47		0.48		Yes	Yes	Towed upright then released - slid on both sides	pavement	UJM Standard Honda CBR 360	Equipped with crash bars	Higher decel initially when falling, then lower
61	2	Lambourn	1991	SAE 910125 The Calculation of Motorcycle Speeds from Sliding Distances	0.35	0.355	0.36	6 mph	No	No	Dragged	Asphalt - fine textured	UJM Standard Honda CG125	Leg shields - right side	MCs used for multiple tests. Friction may have reduced slightly due to wear from prior tests
62	2	Lambourn	1991	SAE 910125 The Calculation of Motorcycle Speeds from Sliding Distances	0.32	0.37	0.42	25 - 57 mph	Yes	No	Dropped - upright position	Asphalt - fine textured	UJM Standard Honda CG125	Leg shields - right side	MCs used for multiple tests. Friction may have reduced slightly due to wear from prior tests
63	2	Lambourn	1991	SAE 910125 The Calculation of Motorcycle Speeds from Sliding Distances	0.35	0.36	0.37	6 mph	No	No	Dragged	Asphalt - fine textured	UJM Standard Honda CG125	NO Leg shields - left side	MCs used for multiple tests. Friction may have reduced slightly due to wear from prior tests
64	2	Lambourn	1991	SAE 910125 The Calculation of Motorcycle Speeds from Sliding Distances	0.33	0.375	0.42	25 - 56 mph	Yes	No	Dropped - upright position	Asphalt - fine textured	UJM Standard Honda CG125	NO Leg shields - left side	MCs used for multiple tests. Friction may have reduced slightly due to wear from prior tests
65	2	Lambourn	1991	SAE 910125 The Calculation of Motorcycle Speeds from Sliding Distances	0.44	0.505	0.57	6 mph	No	No	Dragged	Asphalt - course	UJM Standard Honda CX500 (partial fairing)	Partial fairing - right side.	MCs used for multiple tests. Friction may have reduced slightly due to wear from prior tests
66	2	Lambourn	1991	SAE 910125 The Calculation of Motorcycle Speeds from Sliding Distances	0.37	0.455	0.54	29 - 50 mph	Yes	No	Dropped - slid off a low platform trailer	Asphalt - course	UJM Standard Honda CX500 (partial fairing)	Partial fairing - right side.	MCs used for multiple tests. Friction may have reduced slightly due to wear from prior tests
67	2	Lambourn	1991	SAE 910125 The Calculation of Motorcycle Speeds from Sliding Distances	0.33	0.39	0.45	30 - 48 mph	Yes	No	Dropped - slid off a low platform trailer	Asphalt - course	UJM Standard Honda CX500 (partial fairing)	Partial fairing - left side.	MCs used for multiple tests. Friction may have reduced slightly due to wear from prior tests
68	2	Lambourn	1991	SAE 910125 The Calculation of Motorcycle Speeds from Sliding Distances	0.42	0.465	0.51	6 mph	No	No	Dragged	Asphalt - fine textured	UJM Standard Suzuki 125ER	left side	MCs used for multiple tests. Friction may have reduced slightly due to wear from prior tests
69	2	Lambourn	1991	SAE 910125 The Calculation of Motorcycle Speeds from Sliding Distances	0.45	0.49	0.53	25 - 59 mph	Yes	No	Dropped - upright position	Asphalt - fine textured	UJM Standard Suzuki 125ER	left side	MCs used for multiple tests. Friction may have reduced slightly due to wear from prior tests
70	2	Lambourn	1991	SAE 910125 The Calculation of Motorcycle Speeds from Sliding Distances	0.34	0.355	0.37	6 mph	No	No	Dragged	Asphalt - fine textured	UJM Standard Suzuki 125ER	right side	MCs used for multiple tests. Friction may have reduced slightly due to wear from prior tests
71	2	Lambourn	1991	SAE 910125 The Calculation of Motorcycle Speeds from Sliding Distances	0.34	0.37	0.4	25 - 60 mph	Yes	No	Dropped - upright position	Asphalt - fine textured	UJM Standard Suzuki 125ER	right side	MCs used for multiple tests. Friction may have reduced slightly due to wear from prior tests
72	2	Lambourn	1991	SAE 910125 The Calculation of Motorcycle Speeds from Sliding Distances	0.35	0.405	0.46	6 mph	No	No	Dragged	Asphalt - course	UJM Standard Yamaha TZR125	Fairing - right side	MCs used for multiple tests. Friction may have reduced slightly due to wear from prior tests
73	2	Lambourn	1991	SAE 910125 The Calculation of Motorcycle Speeds from Sliding Distances	0.39	0.465	0.54	24 - 59 mph	Yes	No	Dropped - upright position	Asphalt - course	UJM Standard Yamaha TZR125	Fairing - right side	MCs used for multiple tests. Friction may have reduced slightly due to wear from prior tests
74	2	Lambourn	1991	SAE 910125 The Calculation of Motorcycle Speeds from Sliding Distances	0.51	0.525	0.54	6 mph	No	No	Dragged	Asphalt - course	UJM Standard Yamaha TZR125	left side	MCs used for multiple tests. Friction may have reduced slightly due to wear from prior tests
75	2	Lambourn	1991	SAE 910125 The Calculation of Motorcycle Speeds from Sliding Distances	0.47	0.53	0.59	25 - 48 mph	Yes	No	Dropped - upright position	Asphalt - course	UJM Standard Yamaha TZR125	left side	MCs used for multiple tests. Friction may have reduced slightly due to wear from prior tests
76	6	Hague, D.	2004	Calculation of Speed from Motorcycle Slide Marks	0.28	0.355	0.43	18 - 54 mph	Yes	UNK	Review of studies - dropped from upright or dropped from a horizontal position with CG below riding position	Normal road (and runway) surfaces - coarse and fine	Unknown	Fully faired	This paper is a review of other studies for the purpose of proposing analysis approach and splitting into 2 categories based on presence of fairing, crash bars and/or panniers. Figure 2 shows range of drag factors from the studies that this paper reviewed. Drag factor range approximated by reviewing Figure 2
77	6	Hague, D.	2004	Calculation of Speed from Motorcycle Slide Marks	0.25	0.305	0.36	9 - 52 mph	Yes	UNK	Review of studies - dropped from upright or dropped from a horizontal position with CG below riding position	Normal road (and runway) surfaces - coarse and fine	Unknown	Crash bars	This paper is a review of other studies for the purpose of proposing analysis approach and splitting into 2 categories based on presence of fairing, crash bars and/or panniers. Figure 2 shows range of drag factors from the studies that this paper reviewed. Drag factor range approximated by reviewing Figure 2
78	6	Hague, D.	2004	Calculation of Speed from Motorcycle Slide Marks	0.38	0.485	0.59	29 - 47 mph	Yes	UNK	Review of studies - dropped from upright or dropped from a horizontal position with CG below riding position	Normal road (and runway) surfaces - coarse and fine	Unknown	Faired + Panniers	This paper is a review of other studies for the purpose of proposing analysis approach and splitting into 2 categories based on presence of fairing, crash bars and/or panniers. Figure 2 shows range of drag factors from the studies that this paper reviewed. Drag factor range approximated by reviewing Figure 2
79	6	Hague, D.	2004	Calculation of Speed from Motorcycle Slide Marks	0.3	0.59	0.88	16 - 74 mph	Yes	UNK	Review of studies - dropped from upright or dropped from a horizontal position with CG below riding position	Normal road (and runway) surfaces - coarse and fine	Unknown	Unfaired	This paper is a review of other studies for the purpose of proposing analysis approach and splitting into 2 categories based on presence of fairing, crash bars and/or panniers. Figure1 shows range of drag factors from the studies that this paper reviewed. Drag factor range approximated by reviewing Figure 1
80	6	Hague, D.	2004	Calculation of Speed from Motorcycle Slide Marks	0.31	0.5	0.69	16 - 74 mph	Yes	UNK	Review of studies - dropped from upright or dropped from a horizontal position with CG below riding position	Normal road (and runway) surfaces - coarse and fine	Unknown	Partially faired	This paper is a review of other studies for the purpose of proposing analysis approach and splitting into 2 categories based on presence of fairing, crash bars and/or panniers. Figure1 shows range of drag factors from the studies that this paper reviewed. Drag factor range approximated by reviewing Figure 1
81	6	Hague, D.	2004	Calculation of Speed from Motorcycle Slide Marks	0.9	1.14	1.38	UNK	Varied	UNK	Review of studies offroad surfaces includes studies where MC was dragged	Soil	Unknown	Unknown	This paper is a review of other studies for the purpose of proposing analysis approach and splitting into 2 categories based on presence of fairing, crash bars and/or panniers. Figure10 shows range of drag factors from the studies on offroad surfaces. Drag factor approximated by reviewing Figure 10
82	6	Hague, D.	2004	Calculation of Speed from Motorcycle Slide Marks	0.7	1.05	1.4	UNK	Varied	UNK	Review of studies offroad surfaces includes studies where MC was dragged	Grass	Unknown	Unknown	This paper is a review of other studies for the purpose of proposing analysis approach and splitting into 2 categories based on presence of fairing, crash bars and/or panniers. Figure10 shows range of drag factors from the studies on offroad surfaces. Drag factor approximated by reviewing Figure 10
83	7	Bartlett, W.	2007	Motorcycle Slide-to-Stop Tests: IPTM Data through 2006	0.458	.619+/- .161	0.78	Varied	Yes	Yes	Drop Test	Varied Hard Surfaces (Concrete and Pavement)	Varied	19 of the original 186 tests that say "Bounce, tumble, or flip"
84	7	Bartlett, W.	2007	Motorcycle Slide-to-Stop Tests: IPTM Data through 2006	0.362	.490+/- .128	0.618	Varied	Yes	Varied	Drop Test	Varied Hard Surfaces (Concrete and Pavement)	Varied	352 Tests. The same 368 without the lowest 16 outliers.
85	7	Bartlett, W.	2007	Motorcycle Slide-to-Stop Tests: IPTM Data through 2006	0.346	.480+/- .134	0.614	Varied	Yes	Varied	Drop Test	Varied Hard Surfaces (Concrete and Pavement)	Varied	368 tests including the original 186.
86	7	Bartlett, W.	2007	Motorcycle Slide-to-Stop Tests: IPTM Data through 2006	0.26, 0.27, 0.37, 0.60			Varied	Yes	Varied	Drop Test	Varied Hard Surfaces (Concrete and Pavement)	Varied	4 of the original 186 tests that had crash bars
87	7	Bartlett, W.	2007	Motorcycle Slide-to-Stop Tests: IPTM Data through 2006	0.277	.370+/- 0.093	0.463	Varied	Yes	No	Drop Test	Varied Hard Surfaces (Concrete and Pavement)	Varied	6 of the original 186 tests that say "smooth slide"
88	11	DiTallo, M.	2017	“3 Different Methodologies for Determining the Drag Factor for Motorcycles Sliding on Their Sides"	0.28		0.7	30.7 - 41.1 mph	Yes	No	Release from a rear hydraulic lift (6in off the ground). The motorcycle lands on asphalt LATERALLY. (Drop Test)	Asphalt - sharp	Varied. See paper for specific bikes and corresponding results.	12 Motorcycles. 12 Tests.
89	11	DiTallo, M.	2017	“3 Different Methodologies for Determining the Drag Factor for Motorcycles Sliding on Their Sides"	0.28		0.43	29-43.9 mph	Yes	No	Towed upright then released with the front wheel locked (Clamp Test)	Asphalt - sharp	Varied. See paper for specific bikes and corresponding results.	5 motorcycles. 5 tests. 1 had frame sliders.
90	11	DiTallo, M.	2017	“3 Different Methodologies for Determining the Drag Factor for Motorcycles Sliding on Their Sides"	0.4		0.59		No	No	Dragged	Asphalt - sharp	Varied. See paper for specific bikes and corresponding results.	Lateral Orientation. 18 out of the 36 tests.
91	11	DiTallo, M.	2017	“3 Different Methodologies for Determining the Drag Factor for Motorcycles Sliding on Their Sides"		0.54			No	No	Dragged	Asphalt - sharp	Varied. See paper for specific bikes and corresponding results.	Lateral orientation. Tires leading. 8 out of the 18 tests
92	11	DiTallo, M.	2017	“3 Different Methodologies for Determining the Drag Factor for Motorcycles Sliding on Their Sides"		0.51			No	No	Dragged	Asphalt - sharp	Varied. See paper for specific bikes and corresponding results.	Lateral orientation. Tires trailing. 10 out of the 18 tests
93	11	DiTallo, M.	2017	“3 Different Methodologies for Determining the Drag Factor for Motorcycles Sliding on Their Sides"		0.52			No	No	Dragged	Asphalt - sharp	Varied. See paper for specific bikes and corresponding results.	Longitudinal orientation. Front leading. 18 out of the 36 tests.
94	11	DiTallo, M.	2017	“3 Different Methodologies for Determining the Drag Factor for Motorcycles Sliding on Their Sides"	0.36	0.51	0.64		No	No	Dragged	Asphalt - sharp	Varied. See paper for specific bikes and corresponding results.	Varying orientations. 36 tests 9 motos
95	7	Bartlett, W.	2007	Motorcycle Slide-to-Stop Tests: IPTM Data through 2006		1.1					Drop test	Hardpack Dirt	Yamaha Unknown	1 test
96	6	Hague, D.	2004	Calculation of Speed from Motorcycle Slide Marks	0.62	0.715	0.81	UNK	Varied	UNK	Review of studies offroad surfaces includes studies where MC was dragged	Gravel
97	7	Bartlett, W.	2007	Motorcycle Slide-to-Stop Tests: IPTM Data through 2006	0.49			Varied	Yes	Varied	Drop Test	Varied Hard Surfaces (Concrete and Pavement)		1 of the original 186 tests that had crash bars and said "wet"
98	7	Bartlett, W.	2007	Motorcycle Slide-to-Stop Tests: IPTM Data through 2006	0.92, 1.07						drop test	Gravel			Reference to McNally 2006 report
99	9	Walsh, D.G.	2009	Motorcycle Capsize Mechanisms and Confidence Limits for Motorcycle Capsize Speeds from Slide/Bounce Distance	0.249	.286 +/- .037	0.323		Yes	No	Only sliding decel, viewed after falling			Crash bars. 1 motorcycle	Did not perform tests. Only analyzed data
100	9	Walsh, D.G.	2009	Motorcycle Capsize Mechanisms and Confidence Limits for Motorcycle Capsize Speeds from Slide/Bounce Distance	0.372	.408+/- .036	0.444		Yes	No	Only sliding decel, viewed after falling			Fully Faired, dependent on what engages the road	Did not perform tests. Only analyzed data