| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | EcoGrant Challenge - Website Rubric | |||||||||||||||||||
2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 9 - 10 | 7 - 8 | 6 or below | |||||||||||||||||
4 | Required Elements | All required pages and elements on Home Page, Proposal Page and Reference Page are present and are thorough and complete: | One required element on Home Page, Proposal Page or Reference Page is completely missing or is significantly incomplete and/or Several elements are somewhat incomplete. | Mulitple required element on Home Page, Proposal Page or Reference Page is completely are missing or are significantly incomplete. | ||||||||||||||||
5 | * Home Page: Background | |||||||||||||||||||
6 | * Home Page: Current Research | |||||||||||||||||||
7 | * Home Page: Proposal Summary | |||||||||||||||||||
8 | * Proposal Page: Statement of Need | |||||||||||||||||||
9 | * Proposal Page: Goals | |||||||||||||||||||
10 | *Proposal Page: Description of Prototype | |||||||||||||||||||
11 | *Proposal Page: Estimated Costs | |||||||||||||||||||
12 | * Reference Page has ALL required materials attached | |||||||||||||||||||
13 | Website Mechanics and Appearance | *Grammar and spelling are correct throughout website | *Some errors exist in grammar and/or spelling and/or | *Major errors exist in grammar and/or spelling throughout and/or Webpage appearance completely inconsistent and/or Appearance is unprofessional: information is difficult or impossible to find | ||||||||||||||||
14 | *Website looks consistent in formatting and appearance | *Webpage appearance is not consistent throughout site and/or Appearance and website structure does not thoroughly support academic credibility (info is difficult to find, etc.) | ||||||||||||||||||
15 | *Website has a very “professional,” academic appearance | |||||||||||||||||||
16 | *All content visible on website page | |||||||||||||||||||
17 | Group Process | *Group clearly shows evidence of having followed group processes as required. | *Group contract was not clear, and/or does not appear to have been followed closely | *Group contract was not clear, does not appear to have been followed at all | ||||||||||||||||
18 | *Group product reflects communication and working together. Group contract has been clearly established and followed | *Group clearly shows some evidence of having followed group processes, some mis-communication, etc., appeared to have taken place | *Group product clearly shows very little or no evidence of having followed group processes or communicating throughout project | |||||||||||||||||
19 | *Group contract has been clearly established and followed. | *Group product reflects poor or little communication and working together | *Group product does not reflect communication and working together | |||||||||||||||||
20 | ||||||||||||||||||||
21 | ||||||||||||||||||||
22 | Content - Home Page | *Information on Background is thorough, understandable, and evidently well-researched. | *Information in one or more section is somewhat vague or inaccurate, or does not clearly demonstrate knowledge from research. | *Much or all of the information on the Home Page is vague and/or inaccurate. | ||||||||||||||||
23 | Word Count:75 - 100 words per section. | *Information on Current Research is thorough, understandable, and evidently well-researched. | *Sections do not flow well - information is somewhat inconsistent. | *Sections contradict each other. | ||||||||||||||||
24 | - 1 point per section that does not meet requirements | *Proposal Summary clearly relates to Background and Current Research, and clearly provides information on why and how a specific issue will be addressed. | *Some information appears to be based more on opinion than data. | *Very little of the information presentation relates to research and scientific knlowdge of the topic. | ||||||||||||||||
25 | *Very little of the information presented relates to research and scientific knowledge of the topic. | |||||||||||||||||||
26 | Content: Proposal Page | *All sections clearly relate well. Information is consistently presented and understandable | One section is clearly missing required some elements or information. | Plan is clearly inaccurate or does not meet requirements of the proposal in significant ways | ||||||||||||||||
27 | Word Count: 200 to 250 words per section. | *Statement of Need: establishes clear and compelling reason to address a specific issue related to group topic. | OR | Major inconsistencies exist between different sections of the proposal. | ||||||||||||||||
28 | - 1 point per section that does not meet requirements | *The Goals section: presents clear, attainable goals for the proposed plan of action. | Plan has small vague or inaccurate elements in one or 2 sections. | Required information is missing in multiple sections of proposal | ||||||||||||||||
29 | *Desctiption of Prototype: Clear, detailed plan of action is outlined on Proposal Page. Plan addresses WHO will do WHAT, and WHEN and WHERE those actions will take place. Include visual and written description of prototype. | |||||||||||||||||||
30 | *Estimated costs: Budget clearly addresses potential costs for the Proposal. Costs appear to be realistic. | |||||||||||||||||||