rubric_WritAssgnt2_msp-530_jan12
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
$
%
123
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
|
 
Still loading...
ABCDEF
1
Rubric for Written Assignment 2
2
4321 or 0
3
CriterionExceptionalAcceptableMarginalUnacceptableScore
4
Completeness of responseSuperior in completeness; student has addressed every element of the question in a throrough mannerEssentially complete; student has addressed all elements of the question in an effective mannerIncomplete in some respects; student fails to address a part of the assignment or addresses one or more in a cursory mannerIncomplete in most respects; student does not address most elements of the assignment
5
Mastsery of issuesStudent demonstrates a systematic and methodical grasp of the issues in question; sets the issue in context successfullyStudent demonstrates a good grasp of the issues and includes relevant contexts in the presentationStudent presents some issues and provides some context but the treatment lacks depth and breadthStudent presents only an emerging awareness of the issues
6
Comparison and contrastCompares and contrasts items clearly, offering specific examples to illustrate the comparisonCompares and contrasts items clearly, but the supporting information is general; may fail to include foundational contextual informationCompares and contrasts items, but the supporting information is incomplete; may include information that is not relevant to the comparisonPresentation either compares or contrasts, but does not do both; There is no supporting information or support is incomplete or not valid
7
Critical thinkingDraws clear and insightful conclusionsDraws clear and well-supported conclusionsConclusions are poorly supported or vagueFails to draw conclusions or suggests false conclusions
8
Research and documentationPerforms thorough and appropriate research and documents all sources correctlyPerforms adequate and illuminating research and makes only minor errors in documentation (if any)Performs research but it is incomplete; documentation is incompleteDoes not perform necessary research or displays lack of familiarity with documentation procedures
9
Total:
10
Copyright © 2012 by Thomas Edison State College. All rights reserved.
11
Note: Criteria are evaluated on a 4-3-2-1-0 basis. Total rubric points are converted first to a letter grade and then to a numerical equivalent based on a 0-100 scale.
12
Scale: 19-20 = A (93-100); 18 = A- (90-92); 17 = B+ (88-89); 14-16 = B (83-87); 13 = B- (80-82); 12 = C+ (78-79); 9-11 = C (73-77); 8 = C- (70-72); 4-7 = D (60-69); 0-3 = F (below 60).
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Loading...
 
 
 
Written Assignment Rubric