ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
LEA #243LEA Name: Salmon River Joint School District
2
3
METRICS
4
5
LINK to LEA / District Report Card with Demographics and Previous Data (required): Salmon River Joint School District - About Us
6
7
Section I: Student Achievement & Growth Metrics - Current & Previous Year Performance Targets (blue shaded metrics are required)
8
GoalPerformance Metric2023-24 Performance Targets (From LEA's 2023-24 CIP)2024-25 Performance Targets (LEA's Chosen Goals)2024-25 Results2025-26 Performance Targets (LEA's Chosen Goals)
9
All students will be college and career ready4-year cohort graduation rate2023 cohort2024 cohort2025 cohort
10
89.0%87.5%%100%100%
11
5-year cohort graduation rate (optional metric)2022 cohort2023 cohort2024 cohort
12
N/AN/AN/AN/A
13
% of students who meet the college ready benchmark on the college entrance exam (optional metric)N/AN/AN/AN/A
14
All students will be prepared to transition from middle school / junior high to high school % students who score proficient on the grade 8 Math ISAT44.0%33%23%8/12 62%
15
% students who make adequate growth on the grade 8 Math ISAT7058%55%10/12 83%
16
% students who score proficient on the grade 8 ELA ISAT75.0%47%62%9/12 75%
17
% students who make adequate growth on the grade 8 ELA ISAT85.0%58%64%10/12 83%
18
All students will be prepared to transition from grade 6 to grade 7% students who score proficient on the grade 6 Math ISAT33.0%77%36%5/6 83%
19
% students who make adequate growth on the grade 6 Math ISAT73.0%77%18%5/6 83%
20
% students who score proficient on the grade 6 ELA ISAT56.0%62%45%5/6 83%
21
% students who make adequate growth on the grade 6 ELA ISAT85.0%77.0%60%5/6 83%
22
23
24
Section II: Literacy Proficiency & Growth Metrics - Current & Previous Year Targets (Section II data is required)
25
GoalPerformance Metric2023-24 Performance Targets (From LEA's 2023-24 CIP)2024-25 Performance Targets (LEA's Chosen Goals)2024-25 Results2025-26 Performance Targets (LEA's Chosen Goals)
26
All students will demonstrate the reading readiness needed to transition to the next grade% students who score proficient on the Kindergarten Spring IRI100.0%70.0%88%80.0%
27
% students who score proficient on the Grade 1 Spring IRI80.0%75.0%88%80.0%
28
% students who score proficient on the Grade 2 Spring IRI70.0%70.0%67%80.0%
29
% students who score proficient on the Grade 3 Spring IRI75.0%70.0%68%70.0%
30
% students who score proficient on the Grade 4 ELA ISAT70.0%70.0%43%70.0%
31
% students who make adequate growth on the Grade 4 ELA ISAT90.0%90.0%N/A90.0%
32
33
34
35
Section III: How LEA Measures Progress Towards Literacy Goals and Targets (required) Instructions: To indicate how your LEA intends to measure your progress towards your literacy goals and targets, you may choose to complete either Section III.A or Section III.B. Section III.A allows you to identify at least one LEA Chosen Performance Metric (note that it must be distinctly different than the metrics listed in Sections I and II), which may be consistent with previously chosen LEA chosen metrics. Section III.B allows you to address your plan to measure progress through a short narrative.
36
Section III.A: Measuring Literacy Progress - LEA Chosen Performance Metrics (at least 1)
37
Performance Metric2023-24 Performance Targets (From LEA's 2023-24 CIP)SY 2023-24 RESULTS (if available)2024-25 Performance Targets (LEA's Chosen Goals)2024-25 Results2025-26 Performance Targets (LEA's Chosen Goals)
38
% students K-3rd who score proficient given the Spring IRI/Amira reading ISIP100.0%90.00%100%73.30%80%
39
To ensure adequate instruction, students district wide pre-k to 12th will maintain 90% or better attendance. 90909081% district wide90%
40
% students 4-5th grade who score proficient on the Spring Amira Reading ISIP benchmark testn/an/an/a16/20 80%80%
41
Section III.B: Narrative on Measuring Literacy Progress Instructions: If you are choosing to use section III.B to address the Section III requirement, please use the box below to provide a brief narrative describing how your LEA is measuring your progress towards your LEA's literacy goals and targets. Please note that your description must include at least one clear performance metric that is measurable, has a performance target / goal for 2024-25, and is distinctly different from the required metrics in Sections I and II, above.
42
43
44
45
46
Section IV: How LEA Measures Progress Towards College & Career Advising & Mentoring Goals (required) Instructions: To indicate how your LEA intends to measure your progress towards your college and career advising and mentoring goals and targets, you may choose to complete either Section IV.A or Section IV.B. Section V.A allows you to identify at least one LEA Chosen Performance Metric (note that it must be distinctly different than the metrics listed in Sections I and IV), which may be consistent with previously chosen LEA chosen metrics. Section IV.B allows you to address your plan to measure progress through a short narrative.
47
Section IV.A: College and Career Advising - LEA Chosen Performance Metrics (at least 1)
48
Performance Metric2023-24 Performance Targets (From LEA's 2023-24 CIP)SY 2023-24 RESULTS (if available) 2024-25 Performance Targets (LEA's Chosen Goals)SY 2024-25 RESULTS (if available)
49
Percentage of 12th grade students who complete the Career Pathway Plan on the NextSteps Dashboard100%66.0%100.0%100%
50
Percentage of 8th grade students who will successfully complete a Careers Exploration Course and define 1 career pathway for their future.100.0%100%100%100%
51
Percentage of high school seniors who applied to attend at least one post secondary institution.100.0%100.0%100%100%
52
Section IV.B: Narrative on Measuring College and Career Advising and Mentoring Progress Instructions: If you are choosing to use section IV.B to address the Section IV requirement, please use the box below to provide a brief narrative describing how your LEA is measuring your progress towards your LEA's college and career advising and mentoring goals and targets. Please note that your description must include at least one clear performance metric that is measurable, has a performance target / goal for 2024-25, and is distinctly different than those required in Section I, above.
53
54
Section V: Report of Progress Narrative (required) Instructions: In the provided box, please address the progress your LEA made towards your 2023-2024 Performance Targets (as chosen for your 2023-2024 CIP and included in the sections above). We recommend your reflection include a) your successes in meeting performance targets; b) your areas of challenge (including those where previously set performance targets were not met); and c) any plans you have to build on your success and/or address challenges. You may expand the size of the box, if needed.
55
Salmon River Jr./Sr. High School:

Although we only met/exceeded our goals in one area (6th grade math growth), we very nearly met our goals in four other areas (6th grade math proficency, 6th grade ELA proficency and growth, and 8th grade math proficiency).
With our small population, one or two students have a big impact on our final percentages. For example, we set a goal of having 56% of 6th graders meet proficiency levels in ELA; we ended up with 45% meeting proficiency. One more student in this cohort meeting proficiency would have put us at 55%, right at our goal. We are proud of our work with these cohorts who met or were very close to meeting our goals.

There were areas, particulary with student growth goals, that are disappointed by and will continue to focus our improvement efforts. Eighth grade math is one such area were our goals far exceeded reality. In general, our math scores are a point of focus building wide. We are attending PD provided by the SDE to help us unpack our ISAT data and utilize the Tools for Teachers site to target our instruction in areas of deficiency as revealed by our data. We will also be working with the regional math center at Lewis Clark State to target ways we can improve our math outcomes. Riggins Elementary- This year’s Continuous Improvement Plan demonstrated improvement in some student academics, particularly in the lower grades, and showed that some areas will need additional focus in the coming year. Kindergarten and first grade both met their goals and improved to 88% of their students scoring proficient on the 2025 Spring IRI. Second and third grade narrowly missed their targets by one student in each class. The elementary was able to boost their attendance rate to over 91% for the year. We will continue to make this a focus.


The 5th-grade class also showed notable success, exceeding expectations with 80% proficiency, demonstrating that students are leaving elementary school with solid literacy skills.

While these results highlight areas of success, they also indicate where increased instructional focus and interventions are necessary to ensure all students reach their full potential. The district will continue refining its strategies to support growth across all grade levels, particularly focusing on grades that did not meet their benchmarks.
56
57
Section VI: Notes (Optional space for contextual information about data and/or target-setting process)
58
NOTES: In setting our 2025-26 Performance Targets, we reviewed previous years of available data, as well as fall data when available. The Leadership Team, which includes parents, staff, and community members, provided feedback and suggestions for goals and strategies for the coming school year. NOTES: We are a very small district and do not have any groups of 5 or more instructional staff that use the same assessment tool, so we are unable to provide staff performance data.
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100