ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAAABACADAEAFAGAHAIAJAK
1
JURY SELECTION 1.1https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735Jury points and comments
2
-1:9e8683 ···· 5ca52d653-1:36cd2a ···· 5186d8585-1:17519b ···· 3c4674e8c-1:8ba9fd ···· 7668fa60a-1:046374 ···· a8f25cba0 -1:8b0ea5 ···· ff8249946 -1:f18a64 ···· ef1601efd 0:7dd2b7e ···· b8d6115e0 -1:e70a86 ···· 5c1532990 -1:de8568 ···· 613e33e86-1:f6967e ···· 465cd62af 0:8eca6c0 ···· cd447cd8b
3
Submission №Submission IDLink to discussionLink to PDFLink to SubmissionJurors votedVotes ForVotes AgainstResultPointsCommentsPointsCommentsPointsCommentsPointsCommentsPointsCommentsPointsCommentsPointsCommentsPointsCommentsPointsCommentsPointsCommentsPointsCommentsPointsComments
4
1
0:7ccbe4a3bfac4afd44b20d8042925af13a9fc5aeaec1d600dadd70798f64d9ad
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/3?u=stanislavLinkLink12120Accepted1010101010Very active and popular community member10real, active, has FreeTON works10Goes without saying. Good man. Busts his butt for Free TON. Great addition. All links solid.10Active community member10good, quite familiar with the project9Used the bot, nicely done, would like to see more past projects and better description of expertise.10active in chats, quite familiar with the project and its ecosystem, seems to be a good choice10good and active community member10Very active in chats. Community knows him well. Proven understanding of Free TON10Good community member
5
2
0:a1ea34dca2e765275b40837a54174708a9904442378016595b0b3817ce2e4f8d
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/6?u=giarmulLinkLink12120Accepted1010101010Very active in chats, good expertise10seems real, relatively active, good skills10Speaking of verification - there's one way to do it! :) Solid + solid. Not to mention the activity. Total yes.10I applaud your enthusiasm.10active and experienced enthusiast10good experience and description10enthusiastic, multilingual, familiar with ecosystem, exp developer, seems to be a good choice10enthusiastic and good tech skills10Strong technical background. Enthusiasm good. Verification in discussion link not in PDF--
6
3
-1:efd9afcf6ebc4d73ccd6dae4e3649cd03d7a985f298c4d2d9bfc99781e8a4422
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/4LinkLink12120Accepted1010101010Strong expertise and good submission10real, active, strong skills10PDF is just words but links confirmed. Go back to submitter. CV excellent.10I say YES. The experience and CV are excellent.10excellent CV10good technical experience and working experience10good technical background, strong in UX, familiar with networking protocols. math is a plus10good CV, technical and working experience10Solid technical background. Understands blockchain and decentralization. Provided all necessary links for verification10Good technical experience
7
4
0:fae4aee90538f36117a48eea6e58f3eafb2e39f81b35ba8c5f5aaceabcac5ee8
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/9LinkLink12012RejectedRejectrejectReject-RejectNo prooflinks, no message history on forum, no idea if this is a good candidateRejectreject; the only post on forum is jury contest submission, no linksRejectNot even a submission. Waste of time. No effort. Lazy work.RejectNo info. No linksRejectnot a submission, no infoRejectno information to make decisionRejectno cv links any info at all. rejectedRejectno cv, no links, can't verifyRejectNo info. No links. No way to verify. Link to forum is copy of submission.RejectRejected
8
5
0:a851b466cf7d865d8873d7ef89dff10477735ceb7a99829e95a97ed8d2258097
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/19LinkLink12120Accepted1010101010Good submission, strong competencies, good choice for community10real; active (wiki)10Oh this guy! Yeah. Active member. All links are solid. Not even a question - yes10Here 10 without talking10active member, good choice10g00d experience and technical skills10good cv, enthusiastic, active member, seems to be a good choice10googd cv, solid 1010Excellent CV. Very active in chats. Clearly has solid understanding1010!
9
6
0:041e61fdf3ba6d2582fa7ee8de18a97c6972f842e8aaea06cf79debcabfd55c9
https://forum.freeton.org/ LinkLink12012RejectedRejectrejectReject-RejectNo prooflinks, wrong link to discussion, no idea is this is a good candidateRejectreject; broken forum link, can't check anything, no linksRejectIf this is the Daniil from chats then you should know better. How do I know it's you? That's why = RejectRejectNo proofs, no forum discussionsRejectno proofsRejectlack of identity to make a decisionRejectno links (erroneous submission?)Rejectcan't verify, rejectRejectEnthusiastic. Understands attacks. Good background. No links. Link to forum goes to main site. No way to verifyRejectRejected
10
7
0:0c65c3eebc36d2d0f9a12ac002985e211c5b3bb1711944081f3bffbd6ca472f9
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/17?u=bakaraparaLinkLink1266AcceptedRejectreject10109Good submission, but not really sure about motivation. Still, deserves a high score10participated in several contestsRejectOne link doesn't work. Other link goes to grea work, but even I can copy it and call it mine. No proof.RejectI'm not sure what you are. Not enough informationRejectno proofsRejecttoo fishy imho10doubt that the experience is relevant; no creds besides linkedinRejectnot enought information10Great submission. Everything checks out through forum links3May be..
11
8
0:455c3bbb018b46a90fab5518013aab68b27a3cb8854d978e27530d1b2489ee29
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/20LinkLink12012RejectedRejectrejectReject-RejectNo prooflinks, no message history on forum, no idea if this is a good candidateRejectreject; the only post on forum is jury contest submission, no linksRejectThis is not a submission. This is someone writing something and little more. Need evidence. RejectNo info. No linksRejectlack of infoRejectlack of descriptionRejectno cv/links/any info at all. rejectedRejectno info, cv, linksRejectNo details. Link only goes to forum with exact same text. Cannot verifyRejectBeing jury isn't the only way to participate
12
9
0:64298da7b9a4dbbe3ab9e8770c73fc0105c384098d93382013d7e318f604c5f8
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735LinkLink11011Rejected--Reject-RejectNo prooflinks, wrong link to discussion, no idea is this is a good candidateRejectreject; the only post on forum is jury contest submission, no working linksRejectJust words in PDF. Forum link leads to the contest description. Nothing. RejectMen, create a profile on the forumRejectno linksRejectlack of information to make decisionRejectno cv/links/any info at all. rejectedRejectno info, links, cvRejectNo details. No links. Discsussion link only goes to forum main page. Cannot verify RejectRejected
13
10
0:b909fb7401d201bc89a7329515f6efdd7d23a5473cac6d272a35b98d864f8af0
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/21LinkLink1256Accepted10score 10Reject-10Enthusiastic, active in forum, good choice for the communityRejectreject; no activity, two posts on forum, one is jury contest submission, links prove nothingRejectThis is all good, but what connects any of this work to you? Links to "stuff" 10Why not? The profile is present.10Decent submission. Would have liked to see more community involvement. Still good.Rejectnot convincedRejectseems like a purely marketing person; doubt that the experience is relevant10Link to contestant through forum shows correlation to work. PDF ok. Welcome!RejectBackground good. Link to discussion is copy of submission. No links that connect work to contestant-Nothing I can say about him
14
11
0:08b374020021936f394d67b4cde921c534b3ba3aa79b37febdfa251bf2e9c355
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/7LinkLink1265Accepted10Github viable. Submission not that great but it passes1010RejectNo prooflinks, no idea is this is a good candidate10active, participated in contestsRejectI see your link to the forum and a good job on the diagram logic, but no way to prve it's yours. Sorry.RejectWe all know how to criticize, but we must keep the balance10It's ok. Not the best but okRejectunfortunately no way to check validityRejectno cv/links. unable to vet, rejected10Forum discussion confirmed work-contestant. PDF short but ok10Previous DevOps contestant. Verification checks out through link on forum discussion. Submission very short. Not enough -Being jury isn't the only way to participate
15
12
0:b1af91c036e373c4f54a75877a350287cac7e32340a8d21e712e151ee44983e7
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/16?u=alexLinkLink12120Accepted10Could have spent a bit more time on the PDF description but still good101010Enthusiastic, active in forum, good choice for the community10active, made bots/services for FreeTON10Links work (except one). Resume solid. Submission qualified. Welcome.10Welcome! You are active community member10Good reference links and work shown. Works for me.10liked the projects10good dev, familiar with TON tech, made some projects, active in community. good choice10Verifiable context and good activity. Passes10https://webproxy.grmhub.com/ link doesn't work. Airdrop Mechanics link noted. Other links check out10Good enthusiasm
16
13
0:773090a13b058ca60e50b85684bfd7c12b2e085c2d4d06110d86af4d185f7d35
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/12?u=igorLinkLink12012RejectedRejectWhere's the work?Reject-RejectNo prooflinks, no idea is this is a good candidateRejectreject; the only post on forum is jury contest submission, no linksRejectBoth forum link and PDF are just text with no proof of anything. RejectNo info. No linksRejectSorry Boris. How can I know it's really you?Rejectcan't verifyRejectno cv/links/any info at all. rejectedRejectI see nothing but a paragraph. This could be anybodyRejectManaged to find on forum but no details. No background info. Discussion link copy of submission. No way to verify.RejectRejected
17
14
0:8fa6a61eac6bb416797c85ee8c1716e06ed9c47c3d4d2563248ca90aec4aebb1
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/22?u=korgLinkLink12012RejectedRejectWhere's the work? All I see is someone's textReject-RejectNo prooflinks, no idea is this is a good candidateRejectreject; some activity, but gives no trust for me; no linksRejectI mean come on! I can write that and then what? Guys please understand we need to SEE your work and that it's yoursRejectYou have at least pasted github link.RejectVery little to go on. Anyone can write thisRejectlink to cv or github needed, can't verifyRejectno links. rejectedRejectJust putting a paragraph without any evidence can be an attackRejectGood on paper. No links to verify. Good description but you need links for verification RejectRejected
18
15
-1:807329ac262bbcbc212cc9c8059d797f1a22f5a521e2502740482df2077b2251
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/11LinkLink12111Accepted10The resume is good. Thanks for your devops work1010RejectNo prooflinks, no idea is this is a good candidate10participated in contest, good skills10Your Github saved you. Next time please make your PDF as explicit as your forum link. More links = more info10Good job with freeton-infra. Don't stop - the last commit was a month ago.10Good technical background. Link is hard to use as proof, but someone knew you10good motivation, lack of links to past projects10experience seems relevant. developed tools for freeton10The only reason you made it is from your link to the devops contest which check out. Next time confirm your form10Full CV. Previous DevOps contestant. Strong technical background. Link checks out. 10Good skills
19
16
0:f2213f09ab26d0cf80b7fd91cf7e3e3b5ce2238a3a58902f43a7dbd14b9a184d
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/14LinkLink11011RejectedRejectWhere's the work? Just textReject-RejectNo prooflinks, no message history on forum, no idea if this is a good candidateRejectno links, no activityRejectNo idea who you other than Arthur. I can be Arthur too. This is why we need links. RejectNo proofs, no linksRejectI can't assess just words with no way to check themRejectcan't verifyRejectno info. rejectedRejectJust a paragraph with stuff in it. No way to tell if it's really your workRejectShort but ok. Discussion link is copy of submission. No links menas no way to verify--
20
17
0:e3361cc316683a2f04a2181b0fc452a367c9ce3e9c1813d490e7c1ccdf536253
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/5?u=br3dLinkLink11110Accepted10Decent submission. Can confirm it's you.10106The prooflink is correct, but not really active in forum, at least deserves a try10participated in contests, has FreeTON-related github repo10Your Github link saved you. If not for that I wouldn't have known who you are. Good work.10Good job with ansible-freeton. Don't stop - the last commit was a almost month ago.10This is ok. Good work. Would like to see more links to other work10good github project10good technical background, familiar with the project, security specialization. seems to be a good choice10Managed to find and confirm your ID through Github, otherwise would not have passed. A yes for me10Everything checks out. Link works. Background excellent--
21
18
0:5ff3f061501aba4d225a4fb2737df39db73e067a375127e06f8d6b2537c4ab29
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/25?u=freetoniLinkLink11011RejectedRejectOnce again, no work, no links, no confirmationReject-RejectNo prooflinks, no message history on forum, no idea if this is a good candidateRejectdeclares he wrote a bot, but the bot simply doesn't work; no activity (3 posts on forum), didn't find in tgRejectShort "here's who I am" paragraph in both PDF and forum link. Where's the proof? RejectNo proofs, no linksRejectI need to see more than this in order to know it's your workRejectcan't verifyRejectno links, can't verify their statements. rejectedRejectShort description with no evidence to support it. PassRejectNo links. Discussion link copy of submission. Not much info. Can't verify--
22
19
0:f8abf53f70c1983c904a90be4c9afe04641a0d86d8639fae57a1ca7c550c44e9
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/27?u=krismrzzLinkLink11110Rejected10Some have thought this is a false submission but the work is good. Will take a risk. 10 for meReject-RejectNew account at forum, no link between provided proofs and contestantRejectthe only post on forum is jury contest submission, seems multi-accRejectThrough a bit of diligence we confirmed that this submission came from the submitter's girlfriend. Sorry. No go. RejectNo proofs, no linksRejectYou did a good job, but it was discovered that this is not your work. SorryRejectdon't know regarding girlfriend story, but submission do lack authenticityRejectvoted to reject after checking out the "lack of connection" discussionRejectAs other have pointed out, this work was done by someone else. Not falling for itRejectLinks in PDF say "doesn't exist". In forum discussion link they do. No connection between Kristina Morozova and the link--
23
20
0:d00da4657f3d33a966f55e5e731db5a775127f204dfcc1313da2e18354bf0bf8
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/10?u=ansLinkLink1129RejectedRejectWe need the Chinese community to be jurors, but we also need to see it's really your workReject-RejectNo prooflinks, no name, no idea is this is a good candidateRejectno links, even those can easy prove some submission statements; somewhat active on forum, but shows no trust for meRejectI mean I'd love to say yes, but it's kust a copy-paste job. Next time please provide proof that his is your workRejectI'm not sure what you are. Not enough informationRejectI wish I could say yes but there is no way to know that this is you10probably description was corrected, everything seems present10quite relevant tech background. very active on github. seems to be a good choice. unfortunately no link to git in PDFRejectCopy-paste and no back-check to who you are.RejectNo links in submission. Discussion link is copy of submission. Submission itself is ok but cannot verify--
24
21
0:c79e1810036a3bbb77b496cc994cadd82d62ea5a83c7397a57af25451bdd8e74
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/24?u=aleksandrLinkLink11011RejectedRejectText and nothing else. Submissions need to show proof of workReject-RejectNo prooflinks, recent activity started two days agoRejecttoo big names in submission but no links; somewhat active on forum, but seems fake for meRejectZero proof, just good writing. Please try again in next jury selection contest with provale links. Thanks.RejectNo proofs, no linksRejectNo link to work. No way to fact-checkRejectcan't verifyRejectno info. rejectedRejectYour description of yourself is good. The fact is that's all there is.RejectResume ok. No links. Discussion link is copy of submission. No way to verify--
25
22
0:75d9fdd183d5c126d9b08633044f0bc40d26310d31f4d0de8bdf320e158e0a8f
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/28?u=pipdiipLinkLink11011RejectedRejectDead PDF = no goReject-RejectCorrupted PDF, no prooflinksRejectno links, no activity, two posts on forum, one is jury contest submissionRejectDead PDF. Forum comment with no proof. Sorry no-go.RejectNo proofs, no links, bad PDFRejectPDF is corrupt. Forum discussion is just words with no proofRejectbroken link, can't verifyRejectno info. very brief presentation. rejectedRejectPDF doesn't open - rejectedRejectPDF does not open. Discussion link goes to very short write-up with little info--
26
23
0:8d9cf4902ff25eaa265a6341c82dbc3d1b030a3be4a94a589ea505b285ac3e55
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/30LinkLink11110Accepted10Great skills and has been very active in chats. Helps us all a lot.101010Managed to contact Roman in person, he is reliable and a good candidate10very active community member10Simple = yes! Known. Link. Always in every dev chat. Free TON C++ chat guru. Welcome! 10I say YES. Your experience is impressive10A yes for me. 10. Popular community activist with a clear way to confirm it's him10perfect candidate)10quite active community member with a relevant experience. seems to be a good choice10Excellent application! Very detailed. Good work10Great submission. Everything checks out. Support many chats. Super-active in community--
27
24
0:3427ab94b07473b4c7a98519072dd037c24fa5c96b41088f4d24cbed5ed00940
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/31LinkLink11110Accepted10Verifiable. Active. Welcome aboard (hopefully)!101010Very active in the forum, managed to contact him personally, deserves to be a member of juror's family10active community member10Seen Platon on all the chats, the forum, etc. If not for that = rejected. Your reputation saved you. Links! 10Your verified profile on forum saved you. 10One of the better contestants in terms of work shown and community work too10lack of links but verified profile on forum and in chats10unfortunately no links were provided, has to look up in the chats. experience checks out. good choice10You will make a great juror. Good work. Good submission10Active community member. Verified on forum. Does a lot of work for the community now. Knowledgable--
28
25
0:a1706fcdc297bbcbaf283cd7b408b660dfe3bbd3cbe41af0c010f9b11955716b
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/32LinkLink11010Rejected-I cannot confirm that you are you but the St. Petersburg metro page is decent. Not sure I am able to judgeReject-RejectNo prooflinks, no message history on forum, no idea if this is a good candidateRejectseems interesting, but the only post on forum is jury contest submission, site ownership can't be checkedRejectCV short. "Cute" link leads all to one place regardless of media, with little work. Plz try again RejectI'm not sure what you are. Not enough informationRejectYou have to show me that you did that work. Where can I see that?Rejectnot enough to decideRejectno info except just one link to a marketing project. rejectedRejectreject: All I see is a link to your Telegram but no way to know that https://cute.wtf/en is your work. Sorry.RejectSubmission and forum link copies. Link to work is very good but can be anybody's. No way to verify--
29
26
0:8403285fb4cb3486ece2e4cce3c3404db7c2618d9adc7520ec1880bfa4308a0c
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/35?u=omicLinkLink11011RejectedRejectI wanted to give you a 10 but I just cannot confirm this is really youReject-RejectNo prooflinks, no message history on forum, no idea if this is a good candidateRejectthe only post on forum is jury contest submission, no links, joined tg, but wrote nothingRejectTelegram link leads to an Alexander and that's about it. Could be anybody. RejectNo proofs, no linksRejectJust text. Contact info could be a fake. I can do the sameRejectcan't verifyRejectno links, can't verify their statements. rejectedRejectYour Telegram ID and your nickname in forum are different. It's ok, but how do I know it's you? SorryRejectSubmission and discussion are copies. PDF is 5 pgs, 4 blank. Telegram ID checks out + belongs to 5 Free TON groups. Cann--
30
27
0:0aab2d6561e424c88b0e94d5827e48a896b640a4654b7813bb99a411b175f094
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/33?u=aestlistLinkLink1165Accepted10Do you know the link in your PDF isn't highlighted? If I didn't figure that out I would have said no. Be diligent10-RejectNo proof of knowledge of blockchain, no contact information, no idea if he is a good candidate10some activity on forum, has proposal and contests submissionsRejectForum link is busted. Managed to isolate a link on your PDF that leads to 1 sentence in the forum thread, i.e., nothing.Rejectsome activity on forum, has proposal and contests submissionsRejectThe link in the forum takes me to "Oops! That page doesn’t exist or is private."10not enough links to judge, poor pdf, but good incentivesRejectno cv/links. unable to vet, rejectedRejectNot enough information on your background. Needed to see more experience10Submission and discussion links are copies. Link to contest proposal checks out. Good proposal. Community active. Verifi--
31
28
0:1ee972c0d84c6138fd4d10fa70489907c596c2c91f4361e359beabc94078bf06
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/29?u=creatorLinkLink1129RejectedRejectNo way to verify submission is realReject-RejectNo prooflinks, no message history on forum, no idea if this is a good candidate10no links, but forum activity and used terms show some teck knowledge; have questions, but giving a chanceRejectJust words. No proof.10Having studied your activity on the forum - I tell you YesRejectThe only thing I know about you is you are Peter. I can be Peter tooRejectno links, can't verify unfortunatelyRejectno links, can't verify their statements. rejectedRejectIt's a very good CV but neither the discussion or the PDF show who you areRejectSubmission and discussion links copies. Resume is good but no links to verify--
32
29
0:00043491512ae14f6f2eef295c58457f528c65e9aaddec3822d83a5e98250f19
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/34?u=alexsLinkLink11110RejectedRejectHave to reject even though I like it. No proof it's your workReject-RejectNo proof of knowledge of blockchain, claimed Instagram account cannot be publicly verified10can check that posted FreeTON info in his instagram group (125k followers); have some questions, but giving a chanceRejectLots of colored font words in a "nowhere-to-go" file. Links in forum to obscure soc. media profiles RejectWho puts up an Instagram account in the resume? Anyone can write a few words and send a link to the instu on which, alasRejectThis is ok. No way to verify if it is yoursRejectpoor descriptionRejectseems like a SMM person, no way to verify the relevant experience. rejectedRejectI really like the submission but I can't connect your work to "AlexS". I see 2 different nicknamesRejectSubmission and discussion links copies. Insta and Telegram links check out but neither has anything to do with Free TON.--
33
30
0:9197e61b8ba1665f1161ed809d112afe606b2261b36d7f7fedb209fa122e5680
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/37?u=profpkLinkLink1192Accepted10I agree with all the other jurors here. This is a fantastic resume10-9Excellent personal background, however not active at forum at all. Deserves a high score, as we believe, him being a proRejectbeautiful CV, but no proofs that its owner is the same man who posted it on forum, didn't confirmed through twitter, the10A model entry. Fine addition to the jury. Please be ready to work for the community! It needs you. RejectVery little activity on the forum. Photo on the forum from Google. It looks like a fake. The link does not open.10Impeccable credentials. Everything can be verified. Great contest entry10good descritpion and relevant academic works10excellent background and experience. would be interesting to see them on board10Probably the best submission out of all10That is one-heck-of-a-resume! Everything easily checks out. Will make a great juror--
34
31
0:fd7d01ca536e5742aeee59386a9894f0d65064469ce8b8aa9412feae04618fa3
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/36LinkLink11110Accepted10High activity level and community activism. Good resume10-10Enthusiastic, active in forum, good choice for the community10very active, has real FreeTON-related works10Seen the effort in chats, mostly forum. A lot of work. Obviously a contender. Will do well as juror10Welcome! You are active community member10He will make a good juror. All links can be proven10good description, links, relevant skills10an active community member with relevant experience10nAMI is in almost every contest. Yet another great submission10A lot of work done. Very recognizable community member. Super-active. --
35
32
0:64b9890a1e1cb306e53cf9d8461fafda92111ed8944233611a451d7ad0063214
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/38?u=woyukLinkLink11011RejectedRejectApplication is ok but no real way to prove backgroundReject-RejectNo prooflinks, no message history on forum, no idea if this is a good candidateRejectthe only post on forum is jury contest submission, no linksRejectSelf-description is fine, but where's the proof? RejectNo proofs, no links, very little activity on the forumRejectText submissions and both PDF and discussion are the same with no proof of who this is.Rejectcan't verifyRejectno links. rejectedRejectHi Yuk. I wish you would have provided links to show some work you've doneRejectReally good background. Would have voted but discussion and submission links are copies. No links to verify. --
36
33
0:1fa58d83a9529a3a2fce002ec909f7b78a568b9f0df8eb998c1b2b5087035f6b
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/40?u=ruslLinkLink11011RejectedRejectApplication good. Wish I could say yes but no way to verify if it's really youReject-RejectNo prooflinks, no message history on forum, no idea if this is a good candidateRejectthe only post on forum is jury contest submission, no linksRejectShort but ok, only nothing leads to confirming who this is . The link to the forum is just a copy of the PDFRejectNo proofs, no links, very little activity on the forumRejectText submission and PDF both are mirrors of each other with no proof f who this isRejectcan't verifyRejectno links, can't verify. rejectedRejectOnce again it is just a written statement with no linksRejectSubmission and discussion links are copies. Good based on text only but no way to verify. --
37
34
0:0f19bb0376091ae2d7d3bc65e1a7033fb442c99dd99bd086bef5189cac9a6d9b
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/23?u=ryangoxlingLinkLink1046Accepted10I was going to reject until I saw that others could match your name. Then I did too. Yes, be more careful. Links!!!--10Although the submission doesn't provide the proof links, we managed to reach Mr. Kim in person and consider to be jury.Rejectthe only post on forum is jury contest submission, no linksRejectWonderful words but no way to know it's true. Links and confirmations are mandatory or else who knows it's true. RejectNo proofs, no links, very little activity on the forum. It looks like a fake.10You should have provided links to your work but I can verify you through TelegramRejectunfortunately can't verifyRejectdescription of quite relevant experience but no links to verify. sadly rejected10The only reason I gave you a yes is I could match your discussion name to your Telegram ID. Next time be more carefulRejectAs I go through some submissions I feel terrible because so many like this could be great, but! No links. No way to veri--
38
35
0:104bfafca3fd3c928b5548233c9f86d90e4fbe6eecca152cd0ecc32ec848ad61
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/39LinkLink990Accepted10Very good contest entry. Should make a fine juror--10Good submission, excellent reviews as of professional, participatig in discussions on forum10has some forked TON repos in github, joined FreeTON tg, not very active on forum, but seems real10Holy submission, Batman! Your work is respectable. Background solid. Welcome!10I say YES. The experience and CV are excellent.10Everything can be proven. Resume very good. 10good submission, relevant skills--10Very good contestant. Great CV. Welcome!10Great resume. Followed directions well. Links easily verifiable. Very good.--
39
36
0:6a5acbcc33452dbcdd3716f6fb17732beccf7ec2b9a224a58a3715518fd39f36
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/41LinkLink11011RejectedRejectThis appears to be someone else's workReject-RejectConflicting PDF and discussion on forum, different names of contestantRejectpdf and submission are with different names, referred site is inactiveRejectI can't match the names. Petr vs. Alexander vs. useless PDFRejectSome kind of dissonance. It looks like a fake.RejectYour name in discussion and on PDF are different. No way.Rejectpoor submissionRejectmismatched names (Petr vs Alexander) in the PDF and forum link. malformed sumbission? rejectedRejectThe names don't match. This looks like a forgery.RejectPDF says name is Petr. Discussion link description says you're Alexander. PDF pointless. No links to verify anything. --
40
41
Decentralized Support Contest Part II – Latest Supportershttps://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-decentralized-support-contest-part-ii-latest-supporters-finished/1404

Jury points and comments
42
-1:9e8683 ···· 5ca52d653-1:36cd2a ···· 5186d8585-1:17519b ···· 3c4674e8c-1:8ba9fd ···· 7668fa60a-1:046374 ···· a8f25cba0 -1:8b0ea5 ···· ff8249946 -1:f18a64 ···· ef1601efd 0:7dd2b7e ···· b8d6115e0 -1:e70a86 ···· 5c1532990 -1:de8568 ···· 613e33e86-1:f6967e ···· 465cd62af 0:8eca6c0 ···· cd447cd8b
43
Submission №Submission IDLink to discussionLink to PDFLink to SubmissionJurors votedOverall scoreWinner rankingRewardPointsCommentsPointsCommentsPointsCommentsPointsCommentsPointsCommentsPointsCommentsPointsCommentsPointsCommentsPointsCommentsPointsCommentsPointsCommentsPointsComments
44
10:939679934588f32c2ca121c70f37c5e9cb7fa55502a3f6a9ffb77f0e93ba06a1
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-decentralized-support-contest-part-ii-latest-supporters/1404/10
LinkLink118,094170008I always compare the work to the work of other submissions. Since there are only 10 to choose from: 88810Good job6Working 4 chats and showing good statistics. Thanks.10Remarkable input and hard work gets you... paid! A 10 for me. 10Good job. Maximum point.5Thank you for your assistance. It was helpful.9impressive8good job7I like your support. It was very helpful several times.8A lot of of work done and shown. Excellent job! --
45
2
0:d65dea8792176b2d0ac2a54fcc3dd3cd0419b8c4c1b368ec4e1646390b0e5d2f
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-decentralized-support-contest-part-ii-latest-supporters/1404/12
LinkLink119,9021900010Yes and yes. No doubt Ann has done a lot.101010Good job10This must be Anny from the podcasts. Thanks for all your hard work10Well there she is. The queen of streams. What can I say. Work is work. Everyone should take a page out of her book. 10Ann even helped me10Very long and thorough contest submission. If you ever need a job in tech support, call me :)10no questions)10Awesome streams!9A lot of support everywhere. Good work is easy to see.10Everyone knows the contestant. Wow so much work. Amazing! No questions.--
46
3
0:259100ce5079e693ac09e1a7aa72d91cdda66a35fd0b5d4e4a70ecb25e36e191
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-decentralized-support-contest-part-ii-latest-supporters/1404/11
LinkLink1110,0012000010He answers everything me or my devops ask within 2 minutes. Excellent manager.101010Shut up and take my money10What is there to say other than hi Roma! This is all he does. Deserves a 100 but I can only give a 10.10Yeah I secind that motion. Roman is a workhorse. Does this dude ever sleep? Choke on tokens! :)10Here 10 without talking10Of course I will give you a 1010even I know Roman))10good job!10Roman is all over the place all the time. It almost seems like he is the leader of everything. Great support. Thank you.10Who doesn't know Roman? Busts his butt! No need to even comment. A 10!--
47
4
0:5240ec4dc00ab2dfed511b905a73264023fb3dbc695452efb7a1b968a089dbaa
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-decentralized-support-contest-part-ii-latest-supporters/1404/15?u=weirdopossum
LinkLink115,546150005I think your work is ok but I judge base on what others did and then compare.666A good beginning4It is ok. You deserve tokens but not top for me. More would be good.4Just ok. Please get more involved.6Good beginning, don't stop!5 Yes, very good, but only in 1 community. Would give a 3, but because it's big community give 55good start!)7good beginning7Work done well. Definitely a contender in my book.6Very good work. Would love to see even more next go-around--
48
5
0:75c878e4a3f8339d7d6e4e5b7dddb78112fa0087baec768d78460ea1f60381ea
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-decentralized-support-contest-part-ii-latest-supporters/1404/14?u=c_support050
LinkLink98,22318000-I want to give you a 10 but I am concerned about my ability to judge this particular entry. Abstain7710Well done8Excellent rankings. Highly active group leader. Good growth and potential 88Personally speaking I think you are doing a fantastic job! Keep it up.10You are a good example of how to develop a community.5Let's call it an even 6 because there were a few submission that were just so good. Grading on a curve. 5--10great international community building, that what's the project need9Strong community leadership. Very good. 97Great community. Lots of members. Keep up the good work.--
49
6
0:0c65c3eebc36d2d0f9a12ac002985e211c5b3bb1711944081f3bffbd6ca472f9
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-decentralized-support-contest-part-ii-latest-supporters/1404/8?u=bakarapara
LinkLink114,098130003Minimal effort. Still an effort. I think a 3 is fair.446A good beginning6Rasim does a good job. I have seen it myself.3Ehhhhh it's ok :) Good start.5Move on, you can!2Not a lot to go on. Sorry.4room to improve3good start though lacking effort compared to other submissions5Pretty good work. Good for the community as a whole.4Good effort. Appreciate the help with validators. But compared to other submissions, more would be good --
50
7
0:9bebf7e42b70b552cbe0e67b9ede327b177b27b91e8e454c81e009c21f67ddce
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-decentralized-support-contest-part-ii-latest-supporters/1404/16?u=boris
LinkLink100,00--RejectWhere's the work?--RejectNot qualified as there are no proofsRejectAll I see is someone wrote something about what they did and said "Hi I'm Boris"RejectDear folks, this is not a submission of work performed. I solved fro gravity, but that means nothing if I can't prove itRejectThere is no proofs or links.RejectI cannot really call this a contest submission. The task was to provide support and show what you did.RejectobviousRejectno evidence of job done, rejectedRejectNothing to support your supportRejectZero evidence or links. A short note about what you did is not enough. --
51
8
0:f6466adf8b0490dda4fd7d217cfe3d4267fd296fa7ed6af5640a5b31c7f2a898
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-decentralized-support-contest-part-ii-latest-supporters/1404/17?u=encipher
LinkLink104,807140003I would like to see more, but I think you could have done more226A good beginning-I haven't noticed that much from you personally. I see what you've done but can't judge its relevance2Like you said. It's a start. Want to see you get more involved. 8Try even more, everything will work out!6Not the best. Not the worst. But Surf is very important so sure. Why not.3good start, room to improve7good start. catching bugs is quite important. would be nice if they would invest more effort3Pretty good but I have to compare to others. Judgng by that I give you a 38Honestly you tried. You did something. It's appreciated. But like you said it's very little. Hope you can do more soon. --
52
9
0:fd7d01ca536e5742aeee59386a9894f0d65064469ce8b8aa9412feae04618fa3
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-decentralized-support-contest-part-ii-latest-supporters/1404/19?u=nami
LinkLink117,725160008I have seen you in the forum chats and support. You do a lot.8810Well done6Very good support work. Thank you6Decent stats. Decetn profile. Involvment and support noticeable. Good.10You can become famous7Good ole nAMI! ))) Way to work it bro. You deserve it.7remember the guy but expected more activity8active indeed. please carry on7Good stats. Good feedback to others on the forum. Also some good proposals.8Yes the community knows who you are and know what you do. You're a rock star. Keep it up! --
53
10
0:a6fb5b5d1372d3a6aee6ef371e26f04ef2b0313e871d67e0fb34d48a43702d04
https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-decentralized-support-contest-part-ii-latest-supporters/1404/20?u=india
LinkLink112,639120005Your support is appreciated. More work = more tokens334Very small group involved, please be active in other chats/forums as well2India is a very important market with 50 million _ Telegram users but I don't see the activity.2Thank you Indiachain, but like another juror said: results? 74 chat members in all of India? I know you can do better. 441Not a lot of activity. Let's try to grow your community. Very important2good start but huge room to improve)2very little activity, lot of room to improve tbh170 users? Thanks for trying to hype yourself up. Not enough though. Please try harder3India may have 600M users as you say but your Telegram group has 70. You're top Free TON India group but you are the onl--
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100