A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | AA | AB | AC | AD | AE | AF | AG | AH | AI | AJ | AK | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | JURY SELECTION 1.1 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735 | Jury points and comments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | -1:9e8683 ···· 5ca52d653 | -1:36cd2a ···· 5186d8585 | -1:17519b ···· 3c4674e8c | -1:8ba9fd ···· 7668fa60a | -1:046374 ···· a8f25cba0 | -1:8b0ea5 ···· ff8249946 | -1:f18a64 ···· ef1601efd | 0:7dd2b7e ···· b8d6115e0 | -1:e70a86 ···· 5c1532990 | -1:de8568 ···· 613e33e86 | -1:f6967e ···· 465cd62af | 0:8eca6c0 ···· cd447cd8b | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | Submission № | Submission ID | Link to discussion | Link to PDF | Link to Submission | Jurors voted | Votes For | Votes Against | Result | Points | Comments | Points | Comments | Points | Comments | Points | Comments | Points | Comments | Points | Comments | Points | Comments | Points | Comments | Points | Comments | Points | Comments | Points | Comments | Points | Comments | ||||
4 | 1 | 0:7ccbe4a3bfac4afd44b20d8042925af13a9fc5aeaec1d600dadd70798f64d9ad | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/3?u=stanislav | Link | Link | 12 | 12 | 0 | Accepted | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Very active and popular community member | 10 | real, active, has FreeTON works | 10 | Goes without saying. Good man. Busts his butt for Free TON. Great addition. All links solid. | 10 | Active community member | 10 | good, quite familiar with the project | 9 | Used the bot, nicely done, would like to see more past projects and better description of expertise. | 10 | active in chats, quite familiar with the project and its ecosystem, seems to be a good choice | 10 | good and active community member | 10 | Very active in chats. Community knows him well. Proven understanding of Free TON | 10 | Good community member | ||||
5 | 2 | 0:a1ea34dca2e765275b40837a54174708a9904442378016595b0b3817ce2e4f8d | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/6?u=giarmul | Link | Link | 12 | 12 | 0 | Accepted | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Very active in chats, good expertise | 10 | seems real, relatively active, good skills | 10 | Speaking of verification - there's one way to do it! :) Solid + solid. Not to mention the activity. Total yes. | 10 | I applaud your enthusiasm. | 10 | active and experienced enthusiast | 10 | good experience and description | 10 | enthusiastic, multilingual, familiar with ecosystem, exp developer, seems to be a good choice | 10 | enthusiastic and good tech skills | 10 | Strong technical background. Enthusiasm good. Verification in discussion link not in PDF | - | - | ||||
6 | 3 | -1:efd9afcf6ebc4d73ccd6dae4e3649cd03d7a985f298c4d2d9bfc99781e8a4422 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/4 | Link | Link | 12 | 12 | 0 | Accepted | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Strong expertise and good submission | 10 | real, active, strong skills | 10 | PDF is just words but links confirmed. Go back to submitter. CV excellent. | 10 | I say YES. The experience and CV are excellent. | 10 | excellent CV | 10 | good technical experience and working experience | 10 | good technical background, strong in UX, familiar with networking protocols. math is a plus | 10 | good CV, technical and working experience | 10 | Solid technical background. Understands blockchain and decentralization. Provided all necessary links for verification | 10 | Good technical experience | ||||
7 | 4 | 0:fae4aee90538f36117a48eea6e58f3eafb2e39f81b35ba8c5f5aaceabcac5ee8 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/9 | Link | Link | 12 | 0 | 12 | Rejected | Reject | reject | Reject | - | Reject | No prooflinks, no message history on forum, no idea if this is a good candidate | Reject | reject; the only post on forum is jury contest submission, no links | Reject | Not even a submission. Waste of time. No effort. Lazy work. | Reject | No info. No links | Reject | not a submission, no info | Reject | no information to make decision | Reject | no cv links any info at all. rejected | Reject | no cv, no links, can't verify | Reject | No info. No links. No way to verify. Link to forum is copy of submission. | Reject | Rejected | ||||
8 | 5 | 0:a851b466cf7d865d8873d7ef89dff10477735ceb7a99829e95a97ed8d2258097 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/19 | Link | Link | 12 | 12 | 0 | Accepted | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Good submission, strong competencies, good choice for community | 10 | real; active (wiki) | 10 | Oh this guy! Yeah. Active member. All links are solid. Not even a question - yes | 10 | Here 10 without talking | 10 | active member, good choice | 10 | g00d experience and technical skills | 10 | good cv, enthusiastic, active member, seems to be a good choice | 10 | googd cv, solid 10 | 10 | Excellent CV. Very active in chats. Clearly has solid understanding | 10 | 10! | ||||
9 | 6 | 0:041e61fdf3ba6d2582fa7ee8de18a97c6972f842e8aaea06cf79debcabfd55c9 | https://forum.freeton.org/ | Link | Link | 12 | 0 | 12 | Rejected | Reject | reject | Reject | - | Reject | No prooflinks, wrong link to discussion, no idea is this is a good candidate | Reject | reject; broken forum link, can't check anything, no links | Reject | If this is the Daniil from chats then you should know better. How do I know it's you? That's why = Reject | Reject | No proofs, no forum discussions | Reject | no proofs | Reject | lack of identity to make a decision | Reject | no links (erroneous submission?) | Reject | can't verify, reject | Reject | Enthusiastic. Understands attacks. Good background. No links. Link to forum goes to main site. No way to verify | Reject | Rejected | ||||
10 | 7 | 0:0c65c3eebc36d2d0f9a12ac002985e211c5b3bb1711944081f3bffbd6ca472f9 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/17?u=bakarapara | Link | Link | 12 | 6 | 6 | Accepted | Reject | reject | 10 | 10 | 9 | Good submission, but not really sure about motivation. Still, deserves a high score | 10 | participated in several contests | Reject | One link doesn't work. Other link goes to grea work, but even I can copy it and call it mine. No proof. | Reject | I'm not sure what you are. Not enough information | Reject | no proofs | Reject | too fishy imho | 10 | doubt that the experience is relevant; no creds besides linkedin | Reject | not enought information | 10 | Great submission. Everything checks out through forum links | 3 | May be.. | ||||
11 | 8 | 0:455c3bbb018b46a90fab5518013aab68b27a3cb8854d978e27530d1b2489ee29 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/20 | Link | Link | 12 | 0 | 12 | Rejected | Reject | reject | Reject | - | Reject | No prooflinks, no message history on forum, no idea if this is a good candidate | Reject | reject; the only post on forum is jury contest submission, no links | Reject | This is not a submission. This is someone writing something and little more. Need evidence. | Reject | No info. No links | Reject | lack of info | Reject | lack of description | Reject | no cv/links/any info at all. rejected | Reject | no info, cv, links | Reject | No details. Link only goes to forum with exact same text. Cannot verify | Reject | Being jury isn't the only way to participate | ||||
12 | 9 | 0:64298da7b9a4dbbe3ab9e8770c73fc0105c384098d93382013d7e318f604c5f8 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735 | Link | Link | 11 | 0 | 11 | Rejected | - | - | Reject | - | Reject | No prooflinks, wrong link to discussion, no idea is this is a good candidate | Reject | reject; the only post on forum is jury contest submission, no working links | Reject | Just words in PDF. Forum link leads to the contest description. Nothing. | Reject | Men, create a profile on the forum | Reject | no links | Reject | lack of information to make decision | Reject | no cv/links/any info at all. rejected | Reject | no info, links, cv | Reject | No details. No links. Discsussion link only goes to forum main page. Cannot verify | Reject | Rejected | ||||
13 | 10 | 0:b909fb7401d201bc89a7329515f6efdd7d23a5473cac6d272a35b98d864f8af0 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/21 | Link | Link | 12 | 5 | 6 | Accepted | 10 | score 10 | Reject | - | 10 | Enthusiastic, active in forum, good choice for the community | Reject | reject; no activity, two posts on forum, one is jury contest submission, links prove nothing | Reject | This is all good, but what connects any of this work to you? Links to "stuff" | 10 | Why not? The profile is present. | 10 | Decent submission. Would have liked to see more community involvement. Still good. | Reject | not convinced | Reject | seems like a purely marketing person; doubt that the experience is relevant | 10 | Link to contestant through forum shows correlation to work. PDF ok. Welcome! | Reject | Background good. Link to discussion is copy of submission. No links that connect work to contestant | - | Nothing I can say about him | ||||
14 | 11 | 0:08b374020021936f394d67b4cde921c534b3ba3aa79b37febdfa251bf2e9c355 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/7 | Link | Link | 12 | 6 | 5 | Accepted | 10 | Github viable. Submission not that great but it passes | 10 | 10 | Reject | No prooflinks, no idea is this is a good candidate | 10 | active, participated in contests | Reject | I see your link to the forum and a good job on the diagram logic, but no way to prve it's yours. Sorry. | Reject | We all know how to criticize, but we must keep the balance | 10 | It's ok. Not the best but ok | Reject | unfortunately no way to check validity | Reject | no cv/links. unable to vet, rejected | 10 | Forum discussion confirmed work-contestant. PDF short but ok | 10 | Previous DevOps contestant. Verification checks out through link on forum discussion. Submission very short. Not enough | - | Being jury isn't the only way to participate | ||||
15 | 12 | 0:b1af91c036e373c4f54a75877a350287cac7e32340a8d21e712e151ee44983e7 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/16?u=alex | Link | Link | 12 | 12 | 0 | Accepted | 10 | Could have spent a bit more time on the PDF description but still good | 10 | 10 | 10 | Enthusiastic, active in forum, good choice for the community | 10 | active, made bots/services for FreeTON | 10 | Links work (except one). Resume solid. Submission qualified. Welcome. | 10 | Welcome! You are active community member | 10 | Good reference links and work shown. Works for me. | 10 | liked the projects | 10 | good dev, familiar with TON tech, made some projects, active in community. good choice | 10 | Verifiable context and good activity. Passes | 10 | https://webproxy.grmhub.com/ link doesn't work. Airdrop Mechanics link noted. Other links check out | 10 | Good enthusiasm | ||||
16 | 13 | 0:773090a13b058ca60e50b85684bfd7c12b2e085c2d4d06110d86af4d185f7d35 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/12?u=igor | Link | Link | 12 | 0 | 12 | Rejected | Reject | Where's the work? | Reject | - | Reject | No prooflinks, no idea is this is a good candidate | Reject | reject; the only post on forum is jury contest submission, no links | Reject | Both forum link and PDF are just text with no proof of anything. | Reject | No info. No links | Reject | Sorry Boris. How can I know it's really you? | Reject | can't verify | Reject | no cv/links/any info at all. rejected | Reject | I see nothing but a paragraph. This could be anybody | Reject | Managed to find on forum but no details. No background info. Discussion link copy of submission. No way to verify. | Reject | Rejected | ||||
17 | 14 | 0:8fa6a61eac6bb416797c85ee8c1716e06ed9c47c3d4d2563248ca90aec4aebb1 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/22?u=korg | Link | Link | 12 | 0 | 12 | Rejected | Reject | Where's the work? All I see is someone's text | Reject | - | Reject | No prooflinks, no idea is this is a good candidate | Reject | reject; some activity, but gives no trust for me; no links | Reject | I mean come on! I can write that and then what? Guys please understand we need to SEE your work and that it's yours | Reject | You have at least pasted github link. | Reject | Very little to go on. Anyone can write this | Reject | link to cv or github needed, can't verify | Reject | no links. rejected | Reject | Just putting a paragraph without any evidence can be an attack | Reject | Good on paper. No links to verify. Good description but you need links for verification | Reject | Rejected | ||||
18 | 15 | -1:807329ac262bbcbc212cc9c8059d797f1a22f5a521e2502740482df2077b2251 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/11 | Link | Link | 12 | 11 | 1 | Accepted | 10 | The resume is good. Thanks for your devops work | 10 | 10 | Reject | No prooflinks, no idea is this is a good candidate | 10 | participated in contest, good skills | 10 | Your Github saved you. Next time please make your PDF as explicit as your forum link. More links = more info | 10 | Good job with freeton-infra. Don't stop - the last commit was a month ago. | 10 | Good technical background. Link is hard to use as proof, but someone knew you | 10 | good motivation, lack of links to past projects | 10 | experience seems relevant. developed tools for freeton | 10 | The only reason you made it is from your link to the devops contest which check out. Next time confirm your form | 10 | Full CV. Previous DevOps contestant. Strong technical background. Link checks out. | 10 | Good skills | ||||
19 | 16 | 0:f2213f09ab26d0cf80b7fd91cf7e3e3b5ce2238a3a58902f43a7dbd14b9a184d | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/14 | Link | Link | 11 | 0 | 11 | Rejected | Reject | Where's the work? Just text | Reject | - | Reject | No prooflinks, no message history on forum, no idea if this is a good candidate | Reject | no links, no activity | Reject | No idea who you other than Arthur. I can be Arthur too. This is why we need links. | Reject | No proofs, no links | Reject | I can't assess just words with no way to check them | Reject | can't verify | Reject | no info. rejected | Reject | Just a paragraph with stuff in it. No way to tell if it's really your work | Reject | Short but ok. Discussion link is copy of submission. No links menas no way to verify | - | - | ||||
20 | 17 | 0:e3361cc316683a2f04a2181b0fc452a367c9ce3e9c1813d490e7c1ccdf536253 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/5?u=br3d | Link | Link | 11 | 11 | 0 | Accepted | 10 | Decent submission. Can confirm it's you. | 10 | 10 | 6 | The prooflink is correct, but not really active in forum, at least deserves a try | 10 | participated in contests, has FreeTON-related github repo | 10 | Your Github link saved you. If not for that I wouldn't have known who you are. Good work. | 10 | Good job with ansible-freeton. Don't stop - the last commit was a almost month ago. | 10 | This is ok. Good work. Would like to see more links to other work | 10 | good github project | 10 | good technical background, familiar with the project, security specialization. seems to be a good choice | 10 | Managed to find and confirm your ID through Github, otherwise would not have passed. A yes for me | 10 | Everything checks out. Link works. Background excellent | - | - | ||||
21 | 18 | 0:5ff3f061501aba4d225a4fb2737df39db73e067a375127e06f8d6b2537c4ab29 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/25?u=freetoni | Link | Link | 11 | 0 | 11 | Rejected | Reject | Once again, no work, no links, no confirmation | Reject | - | Reject | No prooflinks, no message history on forum, no idea if this is a good candidate | Reject | declares he wrote a bot, but the bot simply doesn't work; no activity (3 posts on forum), didn't find in tg | Reject | Short "here's who I am" paragraph in both PDF and forum link. Where's the proof? | Reject | No proofs, no links | Reject | I need to see more than this in order to know it's your work | Reject | can't verify | Reject | no links, can't verify their statements. rejected | Reject | Short description with no evidence to support it. Pass | Reject | No links. Discussion link copy of submission. Not much info. Can't verify | - | - | ||||
22 | 19 | 0:f8abf53f70c1983c904a90be4c9afe04641a0d86d8639fae57a1ca7c550c44e9 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/27?u=krismrzz | Link | Link | 11 | 1 | 10 | Rejected | 10 | Some have thought this is a false submission but the work is good. Will take a risk. 10 for me | Reject | - | Reject | New account at forum, no link between provided proofs and contestant | Reject | the only post on forum is jury contest submission, seems multi-acc | Reject | Through a bit of diligence we confirmed that this submission came from the submitter's girlfriend. Sorry. No go. | Reject | No proofs, no links | Reject | You did a good job, but it was discovered that this is not your work. Sorry | Reject | don't know regarding girlfriend story, but submission do lack authenticity | Reject | voted to reject after checking out the "lack of connection" discussion | Reject | As other have pointed out, this work was done by someone else. Not falling for it | Reject | Links in PDF say "doesn't exist". In forum discussion link they do. No connection between Kristina Morozova and the link | - | - | ||||
23 | 20 | 0:d00da4657f3d33a966f55e5e731db5a775127f204dfcc1313da2e18354bf0bf8 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/10?u=ans | Link | Link | 11 | 2 | 9 | Rejected | Reject | We need the Chinese community to be jurors, but we also need to see it's really your work | Reject | - | Reject | No prooflinks, no name, no idea is this is a good candidate | Reject | no links, even those can easy prove some submission statements; somewhat active on forum, but shows no trust for me | Reject | I mean I'd love to say yes, but it's kust a copy-paste job. Next time please provide proof that his is your work | Reject | I'm not sure what you are. Not enough information | Reject | I wish I could say yes but there is no way to know that this is you | 10 | probably description was corrected, everything seems present | 10 | quite relevant tech background. very active on github. seems to be a good choice. unfortunately no link to git in PDF | Reject | Copy-paste and no back-check to who you are. | Reject | No links in submission. Discussion link is copy of submission. Submission itself is ok but cannot verify | - | - | ||||
24 | 21 | 0:c79e1810036a3bbb77b496cc994cadd82d62ea5a83c7397a57af25451bdd8e74 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/24?u=aleksandr | Link | Link | 11 | 0 | 11 | Rejected | Reject | Text and nothing else. Submissions need to show proof of work | Reject | - | Reject | No prooflinks, recent activity started two days ago | Reject | too big names in submission but no links; somewhat active on forum, but seems fake for me | Reject | Zero proof, just good writing. Please try again in next jury selection contest with provale links. Thanks. | Reject | No proofs, no links | Reject | No link to work. No way to fact-check | Reject | can't verify | Reject | no info. rejected | Reject | Your description of yourself is good. The fact is that's all there is. | Reject | Resume ok. No links. Discussion link is copy of submission. No way to verify | - | - | ||||
25 | 22 | 0:75d9fdd183d5c126d9b08633044f0bc40d26310d31f4d0de8bdf320e158e0a8f | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/28?u=pipdiip | Link | Link | 11 | 0 | 11 | Rejected | Reject | Dead PDF = no go | Reject | - | Reject | Corrupted PDF, no prooflinks | Reject | no links, no activity, two posts on forum, one is jury contest submission | Reject | Dead PDF. Forum comment with no proof. Sorry no-go. | Reject | No proofs, no links, bad PDF | Reject | PDF is corrupt. Forum discussion is just words with no proof | Reject | broken link, can't verify | Reject | no info. very brief presentation. rejected | Reject | PDF doesn't open - rejected | Reject | PDF does not open. Discussion link goes to very short write-up with little info | - | - | ||||
26 | 23 | 0:8d9cf4902ff25eaa265a6341c82dbc3d1b030a3be4a94a589ea505b285ac3e55 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/30 | Link | Link | 11 | 11 | 0 | Accepted | 10 | Great skills and has been very active in chats. Helps us all a lot. | 10 | 10 | 10 | Managed to contact Roman in person, he is reliable and a good candidate | 10 | very active community member | 10 | Simple = yes! Known. Link. Always in every dev chat. Free TON C++ chat guru. Welcome! | 10 | I say YES. Your experience is impressive | 10 | A yes for me. 10. Popular community activist with a clear way to confirm it's him | 10 | perfect candidate) | 10 | quite active community member with a relevant experience. seems to be a good choice | 10 | Excellent application! Very detailed. Good work | 10 | Great submission. Everything checks out. Support many chats. Super-active in community | - | - | ||||
27 | 24 | 0:3427ab94b07473b4c7a98519072dd037c24fa5c96b41088f4d24cbed5ed00940 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/31 | Link | Link | 11 | 11 | 0 | Accepted | 10 | Verifiable. Active. Welcome aboard (hopefully)! | 10 | 10 | 10 | Very active in the forum, managed to contact him personally, deserves to be a member of juror's family | 10 | active community member | 10 | Seen Platon on all the chats, the forum, etc. If not for that = rejected. Your reputation saved you. Links! | 10 | Your verified profile on forum saved you. | 10 | One of the better contestants in terms of work shown and community work too | 10 | lack of links but verified profile on forum and in chats | 10 | unfortunately no links were provided, has to look up in the chats. experience checks out. good choice | 10 | You will make a great juror. Good work. Good submission | 10 | Active community member. Verified on forum. Does a lot of work for the community now. Knowledgable | - | - | ||||
28 | 25 | 0:a1706fcdc297bbcbaf283cd7b408b660dfe3bbd3cbe41af0c010f9b11955716b | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/32 | Link | Link | 11 | 0 | 10 | Rejected | - | I cannot confirm that you are you but the St. Petersburg metro page is decent. Not sure I am able to judge | Reject | - | Reject | No prooflinks, no message history on forum, no idea if this is a good candidate | Reject | seems interesting, but the only post on forum is jury contest submission, site ownership can't be checked | Reject | CV short. "Cute" link leads all to one place regardless of media, with little work. Plz try again | Reject | I'm not sure what you are. Not enough information | Reject | You have to show me that you did that work. Where can I see that? | Reject | not enough to decide | Reject | no info except just one link to a marketing project. rejected | Reject | reject: All I see is a link to your Telegram but no way to know that https://cute.wtf/en is your work. Sorry. | Reject | Submission and forum link copies. Link to work is very good but can be anybody's. No way to verify | - | - | ||||
29 | 26 | 0:8403285fb4cb3486ece2e4cce3c3404db7c2618d9adc7520ec1880bfa4308a0c | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/35?u=omic | Link | Link | 11 | 0 | 11 | Rejected | Reject | I wanted to give you a 10 but I just cannot confirm this is really you | Reject | - | Reject | No prooflinks, no message history on forum, no idea if this is a good candidate | Reject | the only post on forum is jury contest submission, no links, joined tg, but wrote nothing | Reject | Telegram link leads to an Alexander and that's about it. Could be anybody. | Reject | No proofs, no links | Reject | Just text. Contact info could be a fake. I can do the same | Reject | can't verify | Reject | no links, can't verify their statements. rejected | Reject | Your Telegram ID and your nickname in forum are different. It's ok, but how do I know it's you? Sorry | Reject | Submission and discussion are copies. PDF is 5 pgs, 4 blank. Telegram ID checks out + belongs to 5 Free TON groups. Cann | - | - | ||||
30 | 27 | 0:0aab2d6561e424c88b0e94d5827e48a896b640a4654b7813bb99a411b175f094 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/33?u=aestlist | Link | Link | 11 | 6 | 5 | Accepted | 10 | Do you know the link in your PDF isn't highlighted? If I didn't figure that out I would have said no. Be diligent | 10 | - | Reject | No proof of knowledge of blockchain, no contact information, no idea if he is a good candidate | 10 | some activity on forum, has proposal and contests submissions | Reject | Forum link is busted. Managed to isolate a link on your PDF that leads to 1 sentence in the forum thread, i.e., nothing. | Reject | some activity on forum, has proposal and contests submissions | Reject | The link in the forum takes me to "Oops! That page doesn’t exist or is private." | 10 | not enough links to judge, poor pdf, but good incentives | Reject | no cv/links. unable to vet, rejected | Reject | Not enough information on your background. Needed to see more experience | 10 | Submission and discussion links are copies. Link to contest proposal checks out. Good proposal. Community active. Verifi | - | - | ||||
31 | 28 | 0:1ee972c0d84c6138fd4d10fa70489907c596c2c91f4361e359beabc94078bf06 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/29?u=creator | Link | Link | 11 | 2 | 9 | Rejected | Reject | No way to verify submission is real | Reject | - | Reject | No prooflinks, no message history on forum, no idea if this is a good candidate | 10 | no links, but forum activity and used terms show some teck knowledge; have questions, but giving a chance | Reject | Just words. No proof. | 10 | Having studied your activity on the forum - I tell you Yes | Reject | The only thing I know about you is you are Peter. I can be Peter too | Reject | no links, can't verify unfortunately | Reject | no links, can't verify their statements. rejected | Reject | It's a very good CV but neither the discussion or the PDF show who you are | Reject | Submission and discussion links copies. Resume is good but no links to verify | - | - | ||||
32 | 29 | 0:00043491512ae14f6f2eef295c58457f528c65e9aaddec3822d83a5e98250f19 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/34?u=alexs | Link | Link | 11 | 1 | 10 | Rejected | Reject | Have to reject even though I like it. No proof it's your work | Reject | - | Reject | No proof of knowledge of blockchain, claimed Instagram account cannot be publicly verified | 10 | can check that posted FreeTON info in his instagram group (125k followers); have some questions, but giving a chance | Reject | Lots of colored font words in a "nowhere-to-go" file. Links in forum to obscure soc. media profiles | Reject | Who puts up an Instagram account in the resume? Anyone can write a few words and send a link to the instu on which, alas | Reject | This is ok. No way to verify if it is yours | Reject | poor description | Reject | seems like a SMM person, no way to verify the relevant experience. rejected | Reject | I really like the submission but I can't connect your work to "AlexS". I see 2 different nicknames | Reject | Submission and discussion links copies. Insta and Telegram links check out but neither has anything to do with Free TON. | - | - | ||||
33 | 30 | 0:9197e61b8ba1665f1161ed809d112afe606b2261b36d7f7fedb209fa122e5680 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/37?u=profpk | Link | Link | 11 | 9 | 2 | Accepted | 10 | I agree with all the other jurors here. This is a fantastic resume | 10 | - | 9 | Excellent personal background, however not active at forum at all. Deserves a high score, as we believe, him being a pro | Reject | beautiful CV, but no proofs that its owner is the same man who posted it on forum, didn't confirmed through twitter, the | 10 | A model entry. Fine addition to the jury. Please be ready to work for the community! It needs you. | Reject | Very little activity on the forum. Photo on the forum from Google. It looks like a fake. The link does not open. | 10 | Impeccable credentials. Everything can be verified. Great contest entry | 10 | good descritpion and relevant academic works | 10 | excellent background and experience. would be interesting to see them on board | 10 | Probably the best submission out of all | 10 | That is one-heck-of-a-resume! Everything easily checks out. Will make a great juror | - | - | ||||
34 | 31 | 0:fd7d01ca536e5742aeee59386a9894f0d65064469ce8b8aa9412feae04618fa3 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/36 | Link | Link | 11 | 11 | 0 | Accepted | 10 | High activity level and community activism. Good resume | 10 | - | 10 | Enthusiastic, active in forum, good choice for the community | 10 | very active, has real FreeTON-related works | 10 | Seen the effort in chats, mostly forum. A lot of work. Obviously a contender. Will do well as juror | 10 | Welcome! You are active community member | 10 | He will make a good juror. All links can be proven | 10 | good description, links, relevant skills | 10 | an active community member with relevant experience | 10 | nAMI is in almost every contest. Yet another great submission | 10 | A lot of work done. Very recognizable community member. Super-active. | - | - | ||||
35 | 32 | 0:64b9890a1e1cb306e53cf9d8461fafda92111ed8944233611a451d7ad0063214 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/38?u=woyuk | Link | Link | 11 | 0 | 11 | Rejected | Reject | Application is ok but no real way to prove background | Reject | - | Reject | No prooflinks, no message history on forum, no idea if this is a good candidate | Reject | the only post on forum is jury contest submission, no links | Reject | Self-description is fine, but where's the proof? | Reject | No proofs, no links, very little activity on the forum | Reject | Text submissions and both PDF and discussion are the same with no proof of who this is. | Reject | can't verify | Reject | no links. rejected | Reject | Hi Yuk. I wish you would have provided links to show some work you've done | Reject | Really good background. Would have voted but discussion and submission links are copies. No links to verify. | - | - | ||||
36 | 33 | 0:1fa58d83a9529a3a2fce002ec909f7b78a568b9f0df8eb998c1b2b5087035f6b | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/40?u=rusl | Link | Link | 11 | 0 | 11 | Rejected | Reject | Application good. Wish I could say yes but no way to verify if it's really you | Reject | - | Reject | No prooflinks, no message history on forum, no idea if this is a good candidate | Reject | the only post on forum is jury contest submission, no links | Reject | Short but ok, only nothing leads to confirming who this is . The link to the forum is just a copy of the PDF | Reject | No proofs, no links, very little activity on the forum | Reject | Text submission and PDF both are mirrors of each other with no proof f who this is | Reject | can't verify | Reject | no links, can't verify. rejected | Reject | Once again it is just a written statement with no links | Reject | Submission and discussion links are copies. Good based on text only but no way to verify. | - | - | ||||
37 | 34 | 0:0f19bb0376091ae2d7d3bc65e1a7033fb442c99dd99bd086bef5189cac9a6d9b | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/23?u=ryangoxling | Link | Link | 10 | 4 | 6 | Accepted | 10 | I was going to reject until I saw that others could match your name. Then I did too. Yes, be more careful. Links!!! | - | - | 10 | Although the submission doesn't provide the proof links, we managed to reach Mr. Kim in person and consider to be jury. | Reject | the only post on forum is jury contest submission, no links | Reject | Wonderful words but no way to know it's true. Links and confirmations are mandatory or else who knows it's true. | Reject | No proofs, no links, very little activity on the forum. It looks like a fake. | 10 | You should have provided links to your work but I can verify you through Telegram | Reject | unfortunately can't verify | Reject | description of quite relevant experience but no links to verify. sadly rejected | 10 | The only reason I gave you a yes is I could match your discussion name to your Telegram ID. Next time be more careful | Reject | As I go through some submissions I feel terrible because so many like this could be great, but! No links. No way to veri | - | - | ||||
38 | 35 | 0:104bfafca3fd3c928b5548233c9f86d90e4fbe6eecca152cd0ecc32ec848ad61 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/39 | Link | Link | 9 | 9 | 0 | Accepted | 10 | Very good contest entry. Should make a fine juror | - | - | 10 | Good submission, excellent reviews as of professional, participatig in discussions on forum | 10 | has some forked TON repos in github, joined FreeTON tg, not very active on forum, but seems real | 10 | Holy submission, Batman! Your work is respectable. Background solid. Welcome! | 10 | I say YES. The experience and CV are excellent. | 10 | Everything can be proven. Resume very good. | 10 | good submission, relevant skills | - | - | 10 | Very good contestant. Great CV. Welcome! | 10 | Great resume. Followed directions well. Links easily verifiable. Very good. | - | - | ||||
39 | 36 | 0:6a5acbcc33452dbcdd3716f6fb17732beccf7ec2b9a224a58a3715518fd39f36 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-jury-selection-1-1/1735/41 | Link | Link | 11 | 0 | 11 | Rejected | Reject | This appears to be someone else's work | Reject | - | Reject | Conflicting PDF and discussion on forum, different names of contestant | Reject | pdf and submission are with different names, referred site is inactive | Reject | I can't match the names. Petr vs. Alexander vs. useless PDF | Reject | Some kind of dissonance. It looks like a fake. | Reject | Your name in discussion and on PDF are different. No way. | Reject | poor submission | Reject | mismatched names (Petr vs Alexander) in the PDF and forum link. malformed sumbission? rejected | Reject | The names don't match. This looks like a forgery. | Reject | PDF says name is Petr. Discussion link description says you're Alexander. PDF pointless. No links to verify anything. | - | - | ||||
40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
41 | Decentralized Support Contest Part II – Latest Supporters | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-decentralized-support-contest-part-ii-latest-supporters-finished/1404 | Jury points and comments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
42 | -1:9e8683 ···· 5ca52d653 | -1:36cd2a ···· 5186d8585 | -1:17519b ···· 3c4674e8c | -1:8ba9fd ···· 7668fa60a | -1:046374 ···· a8f25cba0 | -1:8b0ea5 ···· ff8249946 | -1:f18a64 ···· ef1601efd | 0:7dd2b7e ···· b8d6115e0 | -1:e70a86 ···· 5c1532990 | -1:de8568 ···· 613e33e86 | -1:f6967e ···· 465cd62af | 0:8eca6c0 ···· cd447cd8b | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
43 | Submission № | Submission ID | Link to discussion | Link to PDF | Link to Submission | Jurors voted | Overall score | Winner ranking | Reward | Points | Comments | Points | Comments | Points | Comments | Points | Comments | Points | Comments | Points | Comments | Points | Comments | Points | Comments | Points | Comments | Points | Comments | Points | Comments | Points | Comments | ||||
44 | 1 | 0:939679934588f32c2ca121c70f37c5e9cb7fa55502a3f6a9ffb77f0e93ba06a1 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-decentralized-support-contest-part-ii-latest-supporters/1404/10 | Link | Link | 11 | 8,09 | 4 | 17000 | 8 | I always compare the work to the work of other submissions. Since there are only 10 to choose from: 8 | 8 | 8 | 10 | Good job | 6 | Working 4 chats and showing good statistics. Thanks. | 10 | Remarkable input and hard work gets you... paid! A 10 for me. | 10 | Good job. Maximum point. | 5 | Thank you for your assistance. It was helpful. | 9 | impressive | 8 | good job | 7 | I like your support. It was very helpful several times. | 8 | A lot of of work done and shown. Excellent job! | - | - | ||||
45 | 2 | 0:d65dea8792176b2d0ac2a54fcc3dd3cd0419b8c4c1b368ec4e1646390b0e5d2f | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-decentralized-support-contest-part-ii-latest-supporters/1404/12 | Link | Link | 11 | 9,90 | 2 | 19000 | 10 | Yes and yes. No doubt Ann has done a lot. | 10 | 10 | 10 | Good job | 10 | This must be Anny from the podcasts. Thanks for all your hard work | 10 | Well there she is. The queen of streams. What can I say. Work is work. Everyone should take a page out of her book. | 10 | Ann even helped me | 10 | Very long and thorough contest submission. If you ever need a job in tech support, call me :) | 10 | no questions) | 10 | Awesome streams! | 9 | A lot of support everywhere. Good work is easy to see. | 10 | Everyone knows the contestant. Wow so much work. Amazing! No questions. | - | - | ||||
46 | 3 | 0:259100ce5079e693ac09e1a7aa72d91cdda66a35fd0b5d4e4a70ecb25e36e191 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-decentralized-support-contest-part-ii-latest-supporters/1404/11 | Link | Link | 11 | 10,00 | 1 | 20000 | 10 | He answers everything me or my devops ask within 2 minutes. Excellent manager. | 10 | 10 | 10 | Shut up and take my money | 10 | What is there to say other than hi Roma! This is all he does. Deserves a 100 but I can only give a 10. | 10 | Yeah I secind that motion. Roman is a workhorse. Does this dude ever sleep? Choke on tokens! :) | 10 | Here 10 without talking | 10 | Of course I will give you a 10 | 10 | even I know Roman)) | 10 | good job! | 10 | Roman is all over the place all the time. It almost seems like he is the leader of everything. Great support. Thank you. | 10 | Who doesn't know Roman? Busts his butt! No need to even comment. A 10! | - | - | ||||
47 | 4 | 0:5240ec4dc00ab2dfed511b905a73264023fb3dbc695452efb7a1b968a089dbaa | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-decentralized-support-contest-part-ii-latest-supporters/1404/15?u=weirdopossum | Link | Link | 11 | 5,54 | 6 | 15000 | 5 | I think your work is ok but I judge base on what others did and then compare. | 6 | 6 | 6 | A good beginning | 4 | It is ok. You deserve tokens but not top for me. More would be good. | 4 | Just ok. Please get more involved. | 6 | Good beginning, don't stop! | 5 | Yes, very good, but only in 1 community. Would give a 3, but because it's big community give 5 | 5 | good start!) | 7 | good beginning | 7 | Work done well. Definitely a contender in my book. | 6 | Very good work. Would love to see even more next go-around | - | - | ||||
48 | 5 | 0:75c878e4a3f8339d7d6e4e5b7dddb78112fa0087baec768d78460ea1f60381ea | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-decentralized-support-contest-part-ii-latest-supporters/1404/14?u=c_support050 | Link | Link | 9 | 8,22 | 3 | 18000 | - | I want to give you a 10 but I am concerned about my ability to judge this particular entry. Abstain | 7 | 7 | 10 | Well done | 8 | Excellent rankings. Highly active group leader. Good growth and potential 8 | 8 | Personally speaking I think you are doing a fantastic job! Keep it up. | 10 | You are a good example of how to develop a community. | 5 | Let's call it an even 6 because there were a few submission that were just so good. Grading on a curve. 5 | - | - | 10 | great international community building, that what's the project need | 9 | Strong community leadership. Very good. 9 | 7 | Great community. Lots of members. Keep up the good work. | - | - | ||||
49 | 6 | 0:0c65c3eebc36d2d0f9a12ac002985e211c5b3bb1711944081f3bffbd6ca472f9 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-decentralized-support-contest-part-ii-latest-supporters/1404/8?u=bakarapara | Link | Link | 11 | 4,09 | 8 | 13000 | 3 | Minimal effort. Still an effort. I think a 3 is fair. | 4 | 4 | 6 | A good beginning | 6 | Rasim does a good job. I have seen it myself. | 3 | Ehhhhh it's ok :) Good start. | 5 | Move on, you can! | 2 | Not a lot to go on. Sorry. | 4 | room to improve | 3 | good start though lacking effort compared to other submissions | 5 | Pretty good work. Good for the community as a whole. | 4 | Good effort. Appreciate the help with validators. But compared to other submissions, more would be good | - | - | ||||
50 | 7 | 0:9bebf7e42b70b552cbe0e67b9ede327b177b27b91e8e454c81e009c21f67ddce | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-decentralized-support-contest-part-ii-latest-supporters/1404/16?u=boris | Link | Link | 10 | 0,00 | - | - | Reject | Where's the work? | - | - | Reject | Not qualified as there are no proofs | Reject | All I see is someone wrote something about what they did and said "Hi I'm Boris" | Reject | Dear folks, this is not a submission of work performed. I solved fro gravity, but that means nothing if I can't prove it | Reject | There is no proofs or links. | Reject | I cannot really call this a contest submission. The task was to provide support and show what you did. | Reject | obvious | Reject | no evidence of job done, rejected | Reject | Nothing to support your support | Reject | Zero evidence or links. A short note about what you did is not enough. | - | - | ||||
51 | 8 | 0:f6466adf8b0490dda4fd7d217cfe3d4267fd296fa7ed6af5640a5b31c7f2a898 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-decentralized-support-contest-part-ii-latest-supporters/1404/17?u=encipher | Link | Link | 10 | 4,80 | 7 | 14000 | 3 | I would like to see more, but I think you could have done more | 2 | 2 | 6 | A good beginning | - | I haven't noticed that much from you personally. I see what you've done but can't judge its relevance | 2 | Like you said. It's a start. Want to see you get more involved. | 8 | Try even more, everything will work out! | 6 | Not the best. Not the worst. But Surf is very important so sure. Why not. | 3 | good start, room to improve | 7 | good start. catching bugs is quite important. would be nice if they would invest more effort | 3 | Pretty good but I have to compare to others. Judgng by that I give you a 3 | 8 | Honestly you tried. You did something. It's appreciated. But like you said it's very little. Hope you can do more soon. | - | - | ||||
52 | 9 | 0:fd7d01ca536e5742aeee59386a9894f0d65064469ce8b8aa9412feae04618fa3 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-decentralized-support-contest-part-ii-latest-supporters/1404/19?u=nami | Link | Link | 11 | 7,72 | 5 | 16000 | 8 | I have seen you in the forum chats and support. You do a lot. | 8 | 8 | 10 | Well done | 6 | Very good support work. Thank you | 6 | Decent stats. Decetn profile. Involvment and support noticeable. Good. | 10 | You can become famous | 7 | Good ole nAMI! ))) Way to work it bro. You deserve it. | 7 | remember the guy but expected more activity | 8 | active indeed. please carry on | 7 | Good stats. Good feedback to others on the forum. Also some good proposals. | 8 | Yes the community knows who you are and know what you do. You're a rock star. Keep it up! | - | - | ||||
53 | 10 | 0:a6fb5b5d1372d3a6aee6ef371e26f04ef2b0313e871d67e0fb34d48a43702d04 | https://forum.freeton.org/t/contest-proposal-decentralized-support-contest-part-ii-latest-supporters/1404/20?u=india | Link | Link | 11 | 2,63 | 9 | 12000 | 5 | Your support is appreciated. More work = more tokens | 3 | 3 | 4 | Very small group involved, please be active in other chats/forums as well | 2 | India is a very important market with 50 million _ Telegram users but I don't see the activity. | 2 | Thank you Indiachain, but like another juror said: results? 74 chat members in all of India? I know you can do better. | 4 | 4 | 1 | Not a lot of activity. Let's try to grow your community. Very important | 2 | good start but huge room to improve) | 2 | very little activity, lot of room to improve tbh | 1 | 70 users? Thanks for trying to hype yourself up. Not enough though. Please try harder | 3 | India may have 600M users as you say but your Telegram group has 70. You're top Free TON India group but you are the onl | - | - | ||||
54 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
55 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
56 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
58 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
59 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
60 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
61 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
62 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
63 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
64 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
65 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
66 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
67 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
68 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
69 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
70 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
71 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
72 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
73 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
74 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
75 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
76 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
77 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
78 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
79 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
80 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
81 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
82 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
83 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
85 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
86 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
87 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
88 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
89 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
90 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
91 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
92 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
93 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
94 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
95 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
96 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
97 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
98 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
99 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
100 |