Which financial/organizational aspect of journals should be the community's top priority?

Which should be the community's 2nd-highest priority?

What should the vision community do NOW?

What should the academics on the editorial boards of overpriced journals (be they subscription or open access) do?

Which should be the community's 3rd-highest priority?

Nothing, carry on as normal

Wait until a majority or supermajority of editors agree to resign, and then resign en masse, with a plan agreed among the editors to join or start something else

Don't think any of the remaining are important.

Full academic or professional society control.

Transparent financial accounts

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Transparent financial accounts

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Simply continue in their role at their present journal providing valuable services

Transparent financial accounts

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Transparent financial accounts

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Transparent financial accounts

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Accepts submissions in LaTeX. Desired by a minority of our community, but we don't know how many., keep it simple, don't increase work and efforts for authors by adding well-meant policies.

Full academic or professional society control.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Transparent financial accounts

Transparent financial accounts

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) membership, or a commitment to follow their guidelines., Professional proofreading and typesetting. Improves professionalism of final product (useful if sending articles as evidence on job applications), but obviously increases cost. Soem open access journals go without this to reduce costs., Accepts submissions in LaTeX. Desired by a minority of our community, but we don't know how many.

Full academic or professional society control.

Transparent financial accounts

Full academic or professional society control.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Wait until a majority or supermajority of editors agree to resign, and then resign en masse, with a plan agreed among the editors to join or start something else

Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) membership, or a commitment to follow their guidelines., Professional proofreading and typesetting. Improves professionalism of final product (useful if sending articles as evidence on job applications), but obviously increases cost. Soem open access journals go without this to reduce costs., Accepts submissions in LaTeX. Desired by a minority of our community, but we don't know how many.

Don't think any of the remaining are important.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Don't think any of the remaining are important.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Simply continue in their role at their present journal providing valuable services

Full academic or professional society control.

Nothing, carry on as normal

Simply continue in their role at their present journal providing valuable services

Full academic or professional society control.

Nothing, carry on as normal

Simply continue in their role at their present journal providing valuable services

Full academic or professional society control.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Wait until a majority or supermajority of editors agree to resign, and then resign en masse, with a plan agreed among the editors to join or start something else

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Wait until a majority or supermajority of editors agree to resign, and then resign en masse, with a plan agreed among the editors to join or start something else

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Full academic or professional society control.

Full academic or professional society control.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Full academic or professional society control.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Transparent financial accounts

Full academic or professional society control.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Accepts submissions in LaTeX. Desired by a minority of our community, but we don't know how many.

Nothing, carry on as normal

Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) membership, or a commitment to follow their guidelines.

Full academic or professional society control.

Full academic or professional society control.

Nothing, carry on as normal

Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) membership, or a commitment to follow their guidelines.

Transparent financial accounts

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Wait until a majority or supermajority of editors agree to resign, and then resign en masse, with a plan agreed among the editors to join or start something else

Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) membership, or a commitment to follow their guidelines., Professional proofreading and typesetting. Improves professionalism of final product (useful if sending articles as evidence on job applications), but obviously increases cost. Soem open access journals go without this to reduce costs.

Full academic or professional society control.

Nothing, carry on as normal

Wait until a majority or supermajority of editors agree to resign, and then resign en masse, with a plan agreed among the editors to join or start something else

Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) membership, or a commitment to follow their guidelines., Professional proofreading and typesetting. Improves professionalism of final product (useful if sending articles as evidence on job applications), but obviously increases cost. Soem open access journals go without this to reduce costs.

Transparent financial accounts

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) membership, or a commitment to follow their guidelines., Professional proofreading and typesetting. Improves professionalism of final product (useful if sending articles as evidence on job applications), but obviously increases cost. Soem open access journals go without this to reduce costs.

Full academic or professional society control.

Don't think any of these are important.

Don't think any of the remaining are important.

Nothing, carry on as normal

Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) membership, or a commitment to follow their guidelines., Professional proofreading and typesetting. Improves professionalism of final product (useful if sending articles as evidence on job applications), but obviously increases cost. Soem open access journals go without this to reduce costs., Quality (!!) of the reviews, which ensures a quality product. I am a bit annoyed (and surprised) by the fact that this survey did not ask about the importance of quality!

Don't think any of the remaining are important.

Full academic or professional society control.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) membership, or a commitment to follow their guidelines., Quicker turnaround to get reviewers confirmed

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Wait until a majority or supermajority of editors agree to resign, and then resign en masse, with a plan agreed among the editors to join or start something else

Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Professional proofreading and typesetting. Improves professionalism of final product (useful if sending articles as evidence on job applications), but obviously increases cost. Soem open access journals go without this to reduce costs.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Professional proofreading and typesetting. Improves professionalism of final product (useful if sending articles as evidence on job applications), but obviously increases cost. Soem open access journals go without this to reduce costs.

Transparent financial accounts

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Professional proofreading and typesetting. Improves professionalism of final product (useful if sending articles as evidence on job applications), but obviously increases cost. Soem open access journals go without this to reduce costs.

Full academic or professional society control.

Full academic or professional society control.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Professional proofreading and typesetting. Improves professionalism of final product (useful if sending articles as evidence on job applications), but obviously increases cost. Soem open access journals go without this to reduce costs., Accepts submissions in LaTeX. Desired by a minority of our community, but we don't know how many.

Transparent financial accounts

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Professional proofreading and typesetting. Improves professionalism of final product (useful if sending articles as evidence on job applications), but obviously increases cost. Soem open access journals go without this to reduce costs., Signed reviews--no anonymity, or full anonymity for both authors and reviewers with coded reference list

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.)

Transparent financial accounts

Full academic or professional society control.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Wait until a majority or supermajority of editors agree to resign, and then resign en masse, with a plan agreed among the editors to join or start something else

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.)

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Wait until a majority or supermajority of editors agree to resign, and then resign en masse, with a plan agreed among the editors to join or start something else

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.)

Full academic or professional society control.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.)

Transparent financial accounts

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.)

Don't think any of the remaining are important.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.)

Don't think any of the remaining are important.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.)

Transparent financial accounts

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Accepts submissions in LaTeX. Desired by a minority of our community, but we don't know how many.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Accepts submissions in LaTeX. Desired by a minority of our community, but we don't know how many.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Accepts submissions in LaTeX. Desired by a minority of our community, but we don't know how many.

Transparent financial accounts

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Accepts submissions in LaTeX. Desired by a minority of our community, but we don't know how many.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Redirect our submissions and support to i-Perception, Support the new MDPI journal, http://www.mdpi.com/journal/vision, Start setting up a new journal from scratch, Encourage the VR Editorial Board to jump ship, Encourage the JoV Editorial Board to jump ship

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) membership, or a commitment to follow their guidelines., Professional proofreading and typesetting. Improves professionalism of final product (useful if sending articles as evidence on job applications), but obviously increases cost. Soem open access journals go without this to reduce costs.

Full academic or professional society control.

Full academic or professional society control.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) membership, or a commitment to follow their guidelines., Professional proofreading and typesetting. Improves professionalism of final product (useful if sending articles as evidence on job applications), but obviously increases cost. Soem open access journals go without this to reduce costs.

Full academic or professional society control.

Don't think any of the remaining are important.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Simply continue in their role at their present journal providing valuable services

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Professional proofreading and typesetting. Improves professionalism of final product (useful if sending articles as evidence on job applications), but obviously increases cost. Soem open access journals go without this to reduce costs.

Don't think any of the remaining are important.

Full academic or professional society control.

Transparent financial accounts

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Professional proofreading and typesetting. Improves professionalism of final product (useful if sending articles as evidence on job applications), but obviously increases cost. Soem open access journals go without this to reduce costs.

Full academic or professional society control.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Professional proofreading and typesetting. Improves professionalism of final product (useful if sending articles as evidence on job applications), but obviously increases cost. Soem open access journals go without this to reduce costs., consider a review format like at eLife: http://elifesciences.org/about#process

Transparent financial accounts

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Openness Badges. One way to encourage open practices is to reward authors for doing them. Journal articles making raw data and study materials available will feature Open Data and Open Materials badges in the article itself and on the journal contents page. Additionally, articles with preregistered studies will include a Preregistered badge. These badges make it easy for the community to see who is doing their science in the open. These badges have already been adopted by the Association for Psychological Science.

Don't think any of the remaining are important.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Simply continue in their role at their present journal providing valuable services

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Openness Badges. One way to encourage open practices is to reward authors for doing them. Journal articles making raw data and study materials available will feature Open Data and Open Materials badges in the article itself and on the journal contents page. Additionally, articles with preregistered studies will include a Preregistered badge. These badges make it easy for the community to see who is doing their science in the open. These badges have already been adopted by the Association for Psychological Science.

Transparent financial accounts

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Openness Badges. One way to encourage open practices is to reward authors for doing them. Journal articles making raw data and study materials available will feature Open Data and Open Materials badges in the article itself and on the journal contents page. Additionally, articles with preregistered studies will include a Preregistered badge. These badges make it easy for the community to see who is doing their science in the open. These badges have already been adopted by the Association for Psychological Science., Accepts submissions in LaTeX. Desired by a minority of our community, but we don't know how many.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Openness Badges. One way to encourage open practices is to reward authors for doing them. Journal articles making raw data and study materials available will feature Open Data and Open Materials badges in the article itself and on the journal contents page. Additionally, articles with preregistered studies will include a Preregistered badge. These badges make it easy for the community to see who is doing their science in the open. These badges have already been adopted by the Association for Psychological Science., Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available.

Transparent financial accounts

Full academic or professional society control.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Openness Badges. One way to encourage open practices is to reward authors for doing them. Journal articles making raw data and study materials available will feature Open Data and Open Materials badges in the article itself and on the journal contents page. Additionally, articles with preregistered studies will include a Preregistered badge. These badges make it easy for the community to see who is doing their science in the open. These badges have already been adopted by the Association for Psychological Science., Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available.

Full academic or professional society control.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Openness Badges. One way to encourage open practices is to reward authors for doing them. Journal articles making raw data and study materials available will feature Open Data and Open Materials badges in the article itself and on the journal contents page. Additionally, articles with preregistered studies will include a Preregistered badge. These badges make it easy for the community to see who is doing their science in the open. These badges have already been adopted by the Association for Psychological Science., Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available.

Full academic or professional society control.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Wait until a majority or supermajority of editors agree to resign, and then resign en masse, with a plan agreed among the editors to join or start something else

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Openness Badges. One way to encourage open practices is to reward authors for doing them. Journal articles making raw data and study materials available will feature Open Data and Open Materials badges in the article itself and on the journal contents page. Additionally, articles with preregistered studies will include a Preregistered badge. These badges make it easy for the community to see who is doing their science in the open. These badges have already been adopted by the Association for Psychological Science., Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Accepts submissions in LaTeX. Desired by a minority of our community, but we don't know how many.

Transparent financial accounts

Nothing, carry on as normal

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Openness Badges. One way to encourage open practices is to reward authors for doing them. Journal articles making raw data and study materials available will feature Open Data and Open Materials badges in the article itself and on the journal contents page. Additionally, articles with preregistered studies will include a Preregistered badge. These badges make it easy for the community to see who is doing their science in the open. These badges have already been adopted by the Association for Psychological Science., Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Accepts submissions in LaTeX. Desired by a minority of our community, but we don't know how many.

Full academic or professional society control.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Redirect our submissions and support to i-Perception, Support the new MDPI journal, http://www.mdpi.com/journal/vision, Start setting up a new journal from scratch, Encourage the VR Editorial Board to jump ship, Encourage the JoV Editorial Board to jump ship

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Openness Badges. One way to encourage open practices is to reward authors for doing them. Journal articles making raw data and study materials available will feature Open Data and Open Materials badges in the article itself and on the journal contents page. Additionally, articles with preregistered studies will include a Preregistered badge. These badges make it easy for the community to see who is doing their science in the open. These badges have already been adopted by the Association for Psychological Science., Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) membership, or a commitment to follow their guidelines.

Transparent financial accounts

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Openness Badges. One way to encourage open practices is to reward authors for doing them. Journal articles making raw data and study materials available will feature Open Data and Open Materials badges in the article itself and on the journal contents page. Additionally, articles with preregistered studies will include a Preregistered badge. These badges make it easy for the community to see who is doing their science in the open. These badges have already been adopted by the Association for Psychological Science., Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) membership, or a commitment to follow their guidelines.

Full academic or professional society control.

Full academic or professional society control.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Openness Badges. One way to encourage open practices is to reward authors for doing them. Journal articles making raw data and study materials available will feature Open Data and Open Materials badges in the article itself and on the journal contents page. Additionally, articles with preregistered studies will include a Preregistered badge. These badges make it easy for the community to see who is doing their science in the open. These badges have already been adopted by the Association for Psychological Science., Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) membership, or a commitment to follow their guidelines., I worry about MDPI: http://scholarlyoa.com/?s=mdpi

Transparent financial accounts

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Openness Badges. One way to encourage open practices is to reward authors for doing them. Journal articles making raw data and study materials available will feature Open Data and Open Materials badges in the article itself and on the journal contents page. Additionally, articles with preregistered studies will include a Preregistered badge. These badges make it easy for the community to see who is doing their science in the open. These badges have already been adopted by the Association for Psychological Science., Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) membership, or a commitment to follow their guidelines., Professional proofreading and typesetting. Improves professionalism of final product (useful if sending articles as evidence on job applications), but obviously increases cost. Soem open access journals go without this to reduce costs., Accepts submissions in LaTeX. Desired by a minority of our community, but we don't know how many.

Don't think any of the remaining are important.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Openness Badges. One way to encourage open practices is to reward authors for doing them. Journal articles making raw data and study materials available will feature Open Data and Open Materials badges in the article itself and on the journal contents page. Additionally, articles with preregistered studies will include a Preregistered badge. These badges make it easy for the community to see who is doing their science in the open. These badges have already been adopted by the Association for Psychological Science., Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full)., Accepts submissions in LaTeX. Desired by a minority of our community, but we don't know how many.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Wait until a majority or supermajority of editors agree to resign, and then resign en masse, with a plan agreed among the editors to join or start something else

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Openness Badges. One way to encourage open practices is to reward authors for doing them. Journal articles making raw data and study materials available will feature Open Data and Open Materials badges in the article itself and on the journal contents page. Additionally, articles with preregistered studies will include a Preregistered badge. These badges make it easy for the community to see who is doing their science in the open. These badges have already been adopted by the Association for Psychological Science., Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full)., Accepts submissions in LaTeX. Desired by a minority of our community, but we don't know how many., I would prefer the opposite of the last point, i.e. an option for the journal to do no copy editing or typesetting - the author would do all this in return for a very low publication charge. I find that journal copy editors create more work than they save, rewording my text so that it no longer reads the way I want it to, messing up my figures, and introducing errors, particularly in equations. In some papers I have had to correct dozens of errors; in one paper that I published in PLOS ONE, I found over 100 errors in the published paper that were not in the final manuscript that I uploaded. I would MUCH rather do all typesetting and copy editing myself, and this should make the publication cost minimal.

Full academic or professional society control.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Openness Badges. One way to encourage open practices is to reward authors for doing them. Journal articles making raw data and study materials available will feature Open Data and Open Materials badges in the article itself and on the journal contents page. Additionally, articles with preregistered studies will include a Preregistered badge. These badges make it easy for the community to see who is doing their science in the open. These badges have already been adopted by the Association for Psychological Science., Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full)., Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) membership, or a commitment to follow their guidelines.

Full academic or professional society control.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Wait until a majority or supermajority of editors agree to resign, and then resign en masse, with a plan agreed among the editors to join or start something else

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Openness Badges. One way to encourage open practices is to reward authors for doing them. Journal articles making raw data and study materials available will feature Open Data and Open Materials badges in the article itself and on the journal contents page. Additionally, articles with preregistered studies will include a Preregistered badge. These badges make it easy for the community to see who is doing their science in the open. These badges have already been adopted by the Association for Psychological Science., Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full)., Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available.

Full academic or professional society control.

Transparent financial accounts

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Openness Badges. One way to encourage open practices is to reward authors for doing them. Journal articles making raw data and study materials available will feature Open Data and Open Materials badges in the article itself and on the journal contents page. Additionally, articles with preregistered studies will include a Preregistered badge. These badges make it easy for the community to see who is doing their science in the open. These badges have already been adopted by the Association for Psychological Science., Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full)., Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available.

Full academic or professional society control.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Openness Badges. One way to encourage open practices is to reward authors for doing them. Journal articles making raw data and study materials available will feature Open Data and Open Materials badges in the article itself and on the journal contents page. Additionally, articles with preregistered studies will include a Preregistered badge. These badges make it easy for the community to see who is doing their science in the open. These badges have already been adopted by the Association for Psychological Science., Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full)., Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Accepts submissions in LaTeX. Desired by a minority of our community, but we don't know how many.

Transparent financial accounts

Transparent financial accounts

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Openness Badges. One way to encourage open practices is to reward authors for doing them. Journal articles making raw data and study materials available will feature Open Data and Open Materials badges in the article itself and on the journal contents page. Additionally, articles with preregistered studies will include a Preregistered badge. These badges make it easy for the community to see who is doing their science in the open. These badges have already been adopted by the Association for Psychological Science., Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full)., Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Accepts submissions in LaTeX. Desired by a minority of our community, but we don't know how many.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Openness Badges. One way to encourage open practices is to reward authors for doing them. Journal articles making raw data and study materials available will feature Open Data and Open Materials badges in the article itself and on the journal contents page. Additionally, articles with preregistered studies will include a Preregistered badge. These badges make it easy for the community to see who is doing their science in the open. These badges have already been adopted by the Association for Psychological Science., Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full)., Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Accepts submissions in LaTeX. Desired by a minority of our community, but we don't know how many.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Wait until a majority or supermajority of editors agree to resign, and then resign en masse, with a plan agreed among the editors to join or start something else

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Openness Badges. One way to encourage open practices is to reward authors for doing them. Journal articles making raw data and study materials available will feature Open Data and Open Materials badges in the article itself and on the journal contents page. Additionally, articles with preregistered studies will include a Preregistered badge. These badges make it easy for the community to see who is doing their science in the open. These badges have already been adopted by the Association for Psychological Science., Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full)., Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) membership, or a commitment to follow their guidelines.

Full academic or professional society control.

Transparent financial accounts

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Openness Badges. One way to encourage open practices is to reward authors for doing them. Journal articles making raw data and study materials available will feature Open Data and Open Materials badges in the article itself and on the journal contents page. Additionally, articles with preregistered studies will include a Preregistered badge. These badges make it easy for the community to see who is doing their science in the open. These badges have already been adopted by the Association for Psychological Science., Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full)., Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) membership, or a commitment to follow their guidelines.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Wait until a majority or supermajority of editors agree to resign, and then resign en masse, with a plan agreed among the editors to join or start something else

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Openness Badges. One way to encourage open practices is to reward authors for doing them. Journal articles making raw data and study materials available will feature Open Data and Open Materials badges in the article itself and on the journal contents page. Additionally, articles with preregistered studies will include a Preregistered badge. These badges make it easy for the community to see who is doing their science in the open. These badges have already been adopted by the Association for Psychological Science., Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full)., Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) membership, or a commitment to follow their guidelines., Professional proofreading and typesetting. Improves professionalism of final product (useful if sending articles as evidence on job applications), but obviously increases cost. Soem open access journals go without this to reduce costs.

Full academic or professional society control.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Openness Badges. One way to encourage open practices is to reward authors for doing them. Journal articles making raw data and study materials available will feature Open Data and Open Materials badges in the article itself and on the journal contents page. Additionally, articles with preregistered studies will include a Preregistered badge. These badges make it easy for the community to see who is doing their science in the open. These badges have already been adopted by the Association for Psychological Science., Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full)., Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Professional proofreading and typesetting. Improves professionalism of final product (useful if sending articles as evidence on job applications), but obviously increases cost. Soem open access journals go without this to reduce costs.

Transparent financial accounts

Full academic or professional society control.

Nothing, carry on as normal

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Openness Badges. One way to encourage open practices is to reward authors for doing them. Journal articles making raw data and study materials available will feature Open Data and Open Materials badges in the article itself and on the journal contents page. Additionally, articles with preregistered studies will include a Preregistered badge. These badges make it easy for the community to see who is doing their science in the open. These badges have already been adopted by the Association for Psychological Science., Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full)., Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Professional proofreading and typesetting. Improves professionalism of final product (useful if sending articles as evidence on job applications), but obviously increases cost. Soem open access journals go without this to reduce costs., Accepts submissions in LaTeX. Desired by a minority of our community, but we don't know how many.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Openness Badges. One way to encourage open practices is to reward authors for doing them. Journal articles making raw data and study materials available will feature Open Data and Open Materials badges in the article itself and on the journal contents page. Additionally, articles with preregistered studies will include a Preregistered badge. These badges make it easy for the community to see who is doing their science in the open. These badges have already been adopted by the Association for Psychological Science., Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full)., Professional proofreading and typesetting. Improves professionalism of final product (useful if sending articles as evidence on job applications), but obviously increases cost. Soem open access journals go without this to reduce costs.

Full academic or professional society control.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Openness Badges. One way to encourage open practices is to reward authors for doing them. Journal articles making raw data and study materials available will feature Open Data and Open Materials badges in the article itself and on the journal contents page. Additionally, articles with preregistered studies will include a Preregistered badge. These badges make it easy for the community to see who is doing their science in the open. These badges have already been adopted by the Association for Psychological Science., Professional proofreading and typesetting. Improves professionalism of final product (useful if sending articles as evidence on job applications), but obviously increases cost. Soem open access journals go without this to reduce costs.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Openness Badges. One way to encourage open practices is to reward authors for doing them. Journal articles making raw data and study materials available will feature Open Data and Open Materials badges in the article itself and on the journal contents page. Additionally, articles with preregistered studies will include a Preregistered badge. These badges make it easy for the community to see who is doing their science in the open. These badges have already been adopted by the Association for Psychological Science., Professional proofreading and typesetting. Improves professionalism of final product (useful if sending articles as evidence on job applications), but obviously increases cost. Soem open access journals go without this to reduce costs.

Transparent financial accounts

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Support the new MDPI journal, http://www.mdpi.com/journal/vision, Start setting up a new journal from scratch, Encourage the VR Editorial Board to jump ship, Encourage the JoV Editorial Board to jump ship, Don;t use journals at all. Submit all work to repositories and let the community judge the quality.

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full).

Transparent financial accounts

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full).

Don't think any of the remaining are important.

Full academic or professional society control.

Transparent financial accounts

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full).

Transparent financial accounts

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full).

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full).

Transparent financial accounts

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full).

Don't think any of the remaining are important.

Full academic or professional society control.

Transparent financial accounts

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full).

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full).

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full).

Full academic or professional society control.

Full academic or professional society control.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full)., Accepts submissions in LaTeX. Desired by a minority of our community, but we don't know how many., Consider a procedure to let the author to remain anonymous, at least for the first stages of the review process: too often editors' and reviewers' decisions are biased by the popularity of the author(s)' name...

Transparent financial accounts

Full academic or professional society control.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Wait until a majority or supermajority of editors agree to resign, and then resign en masse, with a plan agreed among the editors to join or start something else

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full)., Accepts submissions in LaTeX. Desired by a minority of our community, but we don't know how many., I didn't know where to write this comment but I think the institutions should prevent their researchers to work as editors/reviewers for non open access journals

Transparent financial accounts

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full)., Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) membership, or a commitment to follow their guidelines.

Don't think any of the remaining are important.

Full academic or professional society control.

Transparent financial accounts

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full)., Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) membership, or a commitment to follow their guidelines., Accepts submissions in LaTeX. Desired by a minority of our community, but we don't know how many.

Don't think any of the remaining are important.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full)., Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available.

Full academic or professional society control.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full)., Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available.

Transparent financial accounts

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full)., Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available.

Transparent financial accounts

Full academic or professional society control.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Wait until a majority or supermajority of editors agree to resign, and then resign en masse, with a plan agreed among the editors to join or start something else

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full)., Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Accepts submissions in LaTeX. Desired by a minority of our community, but we don't know how many.

Transparent financial accounts

Transparent financial accounts

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Wait until a majority or supermajority of editors agree to resign, and then resign en masse, with a plan agreed among the editors to join or start something else

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full)., Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) membership, or a commitment to follow their guidelines.

Make a change (choosing this will lead to some possible options)

Open review, if the authors choose. (Upon initial submission of a manuscript, the authors can elect to have the reviews of the manuscript published along with the manuscript itself, should the manuscript be accepted. Reviewers could elect to sign their reviews or remain anonymous. This allows the community to judge the vetting of the manuscript after publication, as well as prevents the disappearance of the valuable information in many reviews.), Post publication review. Journal articles will have an associated forum page, in which readers can post comments on articles after publication. This allows the community to discuss papers in an immediate and transparent way. The system could additionally support numerical ratings of papers to allow automated analysis and ranking (see e.g. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2012.00079/full)., Open journal timeframes. The journal could make data on time to first review, acceptance, and time from review to publication available., Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) membership, or a commitment to follow their guidelines.