ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
Name Of StudentGradeComments
Note: many people got 8/9 on the quiz but their response at the bottom and on the utterances boosted that up
2
Peyton Leigh0.95 /1
Had a good grade on the MC, but the FRQ lacked slight detail.
KEY for MC
3
Justin Liporada0.92 /1
Decent grade on the MC, but solid FRQ
ACED9/9
4
Sharon Kodali0.94 /1
Had a good grade on the MC, but the FRQ lacked slight length.
Good/Great
8/9
5
Torin Wulf0.98 /1
Aced MC, Great FRQ, lengthy and indepth detail, exceptional
Decent7/9
6
Andrew Kim0.96 /1
Aced the MC, FRQ was good, lacked tiny detail
Bad6/9 and <
7
Isabel Marilla0.93/1
Decent on the MC, good on the FRQ, lacked length and detail, no support for the main idea
8
Tara Sehdave0.93 /1Did alright on the MC, FRQ was great
9
Matthew Wakayama0.95 /1
Aced the MC, FRQ was good, lacked evidence for his claim
10
Aditya Desai0.99/1had a lengthy and indepth response
11
Alisha Hussain0.95 /1
Did good on the MC, FRQ was great, very detailed
12
Ameer Hussain0.90 /1
Did good on the MC, FRQ lacked great detail and length
13
David Lee0.93 /1
Did decent on the MC, FRQ included decent details, claims, and evidence.
14
Nitin Balaji0.95 /1
Did decent on the MC, aced the FRQ, included great detail.
15
Trevor Huang0.92 /1
Did good on the MC, FRQ had great length but detail was slightly off topic,
16
Lincoln Crowell0.91 /1Did bad on the MC, but aced the FRQ
17
Abdullah Khanani0.95/1
Did decent on the MC, did great on the FRQ
18
Gurshawn B0.91 /1
Did good on the MC, FRQ had great detial, if expanded would be bumped up to a 0.94
19
Lakshanya0.92 /1
Did decent on the MC, FRQ included decent details, claims, and evidence.
20
Anika Bhatnagar0.95 /1
Did good on the MC, FRQ was great, very detailed
21
Matthew Wang 0.94 /1
Did great on the MC, FRQ lacked a bit od detail
22
Hanlun0.96 /1
Aced the MC and exceptional FRQ, great job!
23
Ashwin V0.90 /1
Did bad on the MC, did decent on FRQ
24
Ishan Cornick0.9 /1
Did great on the MC, FRQ lacked a lot of length, detail wasn't expanded whatsoever
25
Saathvik Gampa0.92 /1
Did very bad on the MC, but FRQ was amazing, raised from 0.86 to 0.89 due to solid FRQ
26
Kayden Le0.93 /1
Did good on the MC, FRQ was good, detail very on point yet the second hald of the evidence was slightly off topic
27
Akshay Nagesh0.94 /1
Did decent on the MC, FRQ was amazing, worthy of a 0.94
28
Sergi s.0.93 /1
Did good on the MC, FRQ lacked a bit of length
29
Dante A.0.92 /1
Did decent on MC, FRQ had great detail and length
30
Vance Reynolds0.91 /1
Did good on MC, did decent on FRQ, add more detail
31
Anusha0.92 /1
Did good on the MC, FRQ had wrong evidence
32
Nandan0.96 /1
Aced MC and did great on FRQ, good job!
33
Arnav 0.89 /1
Did bad on the MC, did good on the FRQ
34
Varun0.90 /1Did decent on both MC and FRQ
35
Vibha0.89/1
Did bad on the MC, did very good on the FRQ
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100