Account Options>

  1. Sign in
rubric_staffdevelproject_EDL-670-jan12
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
$
%
123
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
|
 
Still loading...
ABCDEF
1
Rubric for Staff Development Program
2
4321 or 0
3
CriterionExceptionalAcceptableMarginalUnacceptableScore
4
CompletenessYour program includes at least three sessions and thoroughly describes the goals, needs assessment, activities, setting, trainer(s), incentives, and evaluation and review.Your program includes at least three sessions and describes the goals, needs assessment, activities, setting, trainer(s), incentives, and evaluation and review.Your program includes the requisite number of sessions and somewhat describes the goals, needs assessment, activities, setting, trainer(s), incentives, and evaluation and review.Your program does not include the requisite number of sessions and poorly describes the goals, needs assessment, activities, setting, trainer(s), incentives, and evaluation and review.
5
Alignment with overall school or district planYour program clearly aligns with the school's or district's vision, goals, and technology plans.Your program mostly aligns with the school's or district's vision, goals, and technology plans.Your program somewhat aligns with the school's or district's vision, goals, and technology plans.Your program does not align well with the school's or district's vision, goals, and technology plans.
6
Incorporation of best practicesYour program clearly incorporates best practices of staff development with multiple references to the readings and discussion forums.Your program incorporates best practices of staff development with appropriate references to the readings and Discussion Board.Your program incorporates some best practices of staff development with few, if any, references to the readings and Discussion Board.Your program incorporates few, if any, best practices of staff development and omits references to the readings and Discussion Board.
7
Overall presentationYour project is well-organized, clearly written, and attractively presented.Your project is organized, well-written, and attractively presented.Your project is attractively presented but lacks organization and is carelessly written.Your project is disorganized, poorly written, and unattractively presented.
8
Total:
9
Copyright © 2012 by Thomas Edison State College. All rights reserved.
10
Note: Criteria are evaluated on a 4-3-2-1-0 basis. Total rubric points are converted first to a letter grade and then to a numerical equivalent based on a 0-100 scale.
11
Scale: 16 = A (93–100); 15 = A– (90–92); 14 = B+ (88–89); 12–13 = B (83–87); 11 = B– (80–82); 10 = C+ (78–79); 8–9 = C (73–77); 7 = C– (70–72); 3–6 = D (60–69); 0–2 = F (below 60).
Loading...
 
 
 
Written Assignment Rubric