ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAAAB
1
2
WARNING - please do not modify this without contacting gwatts@uw.edu!
3
4
If you agree to the meeting, please add your frontier name in this column. If not, please do not add anythingColors:
White: Not yet reviewed
Yellow: Not signed off on yet
Green: Signed off
WARNING: If Status says "done", and you modify it here, you have to make sure to explicitly tell gwatts@uw.edu or it won't make it back into the master schedule!
5
Frontier Signon
Requesting Frontier
Session NameInter Frontier ThemeToipcal Groups
Meeting Duration (hr)
Discussion TopicsIs Same As SessionCommentsStatus In Master Schedule
6
CFNFXNF1Neutrino mass scale with beta decay kinematics, double beta decay, and cosmologyNF, CF4CF Comment: Should also discuss cosmological measurements of neutrino massesDone
7
EFNFXNF2Cross-cutting issuesNF, EF2Comment from EF -- 4 hours is way too much for these discussions. we do not see many whitepapers on such issues. Reply from NF: agree, I am not sure how 4 hours was determined to be the default, will reduce to 2Done
8
NFXNF3Success stories from NFNF, CEF2Convert to NF ONLY Session (see email)Done
9
CF, IFNFXNF4Dark matter detectorNF, CF, IF4focus on common detector/instrumentation issues between neutrinos (both accelerator nu and 0nbb) and dark matter detection: liquid noble detectors, low background detector components, possibilities for dark matter detection using detectors designed for neutrino experiments (eg: DUNE module of opportunity).XIF4Done
10
TFNFXNF5Neutrino theory networkNF, TF2XTF1TF: Ok to include TF here? NF: Yes, good, CEF removed as doesn't want to be part of itDone
11
RFNFXNF6Netrinoless double beta decayNF, RF4XUF2UF: Suggestion below to add UF 0nuBB facility topics to this session. OK. Is 4 hours enough for all three Frontiers? (But 4 hours is also long). This is a duplicate after sign off from NFDone
12
CF, TFNFXNF7high energy and ultrahigh energy astrophysical neutrinoNF, CF, TF4XTF1Done
13
AFNFXNF8Accelerator neutrino sources/cross-cutting issuesNF, AF4AF: AF02 topical group needs to be involved in planningDone
14
15
Frontier Signon
Requesting Frontier
Session NameInter Frontier ThemeToipcal Groups
Meeting Duration (hr)
Discussion TopicsIs Same As SessionCommentsStatus In Master Schedule
16
UF, CompF, IFCFXCF1Future FacilitiesCF, IF, CompF, UF2Future facilities for each frontier; synergies between themXIF4UF: XUF3 was *just* with CF and XUF4 *just* with IF, but these can readily combine into this one (XCF1), assuming IF signs-on.Done
17
EF, RF, TFCFXCF2CF1 CF2 CF3 CF7 DM ComplementarityCF, EF, RF, TF4Intro to DM; Dark matter searches at each frontier; complementarity of the searches (Maybe expand to 4 hous?)XUF3?, XRF5?, XEF15Increased length to 4 hoursDone
18
19
Frontier Signon
Requesting Frontier
Session NameInter Frontier ThemeToipcal Groups
Meeting Duration (hr)
Discussion TopicsIs Same As SessionCommentsStatus In Master Schedule
20
CompFIFXIF1readout and AI/MLIF, CompF2Done
21
UFIFXIF2facilities (and training?)IF, UF1.5XAF8, XAF9UF: Happy to particpate. Was not in our plans. Recomment 1.5 hours.Done
22
NFIFXIF3Instrumentation for Neutrino experimentsIF, NF4XNF10NF: XNF4 is just DM complementarity, NF-IF have other crosscuts as well that would go in this sessionDone
23
NF, CompF, UFIFXIF4Instrumentation for Cosmic frontierIF, CF, NF4Photon Detectors, Quantum Sensors, DM detectorsXCF1, XNF4Done
24
EF, AFIFXIF5detectors and MDIIF, EF, AF4XEF2, XEF9AF: among other topics - MDI in Muon Colliders; detector backgrouns in linear colliders incl plasma based; please involve AF1,3,4 and 6 in planningDone
25
RF, EFIFXIF6focus on timing and more generally tracking detectors.IF, RF, EF2EF comment --- it would be helpful to understand what will be dicussed here - which witepapers. 4 hours is a bit too much. RF comment: agree with EF. IF: that's fine.Done
26
27
Frontier Signon
Requesting Frontier
Session NameInter Frontier ThemeToipcal Groups
Meeting Duration (hr)
Discussion TopicsIs Same As SessionCommentsStatus In Master Schedule
28
TF, RF, EF, AF, UF, NF, IF, CompFCEFXCEF1Feedback of other frontiers for other frontiers
CEF, EF, NF, RF, CF, TF, AF, IF, CompF, UF
4Any CEF issues or topics from other frontiers, summary of major topics, to be presented to the community, see if aspects not captures, or needs updating, etc.XEF1NF: Possibly covers same as line 8 requested by NF? CEF: Reports presented earlier, NF: not sure I understand this response? Or maybe this is a separate comment? We thought it might be interesting to have a session to focus on details of successful CEF programs within NF which may be too detailed for this larger all-frontier meeting - Should this become a large afternoon session?Done
29
AFCEF, AFXCEF3Accelerator Technology spin-offs - colloquiumWas added here by AFXAF9(added by AF to match AF request - see AF) - Colloquia, will likely be afternoon - move to colloquia document!Done
30
31
Frontier Signon
Requesting Frontier
Session NameInter Frontier ThemeToipcal Groups
Meeting Duration (hr)
Discussion TopicsIs Same As SessionCommentsStatus In Master Schedule
32
RFXRF1RF4 EF9 on exotics at collidersRF1, EF092XEF13?EF Comments - can this be discussed during one of the EF09 teport review sessions, as by CSS, the report will be out for comment and a seperate discussion would be uncessary. This then should be discussed as an integra; part of the EF9 report Done
33
TF, EF, RFRFXRF2RF1RF, EF, TF2Flavor anomalies, exotics at collidersXTF1, XEF13?EF Comments - which whitepapers will be discussed here? RF: the ones submitted to RF1 and of interest to EF (flavor anomalies, for example)?Done
34
IFRFXRF3RF1RF, IF2Discuss picosecond detectors (fast timing in tracking and calorimetry)Done
35
TF, EFRFXRF4RF7-EF6-EF7 RF, EF, TF2hadrons as production probes; production mechanisms probing the internal structure of exotic hadronsXEF16EF Comment - can this be discussed during one of the EF6/7 teport review sessions, as by CSS, the report will be out for comment and a seperate discussion would be uncessary. This then should be discussed as an integra; part of the EF6/7 report RF: I don't understand your point. You don't want a meeting to discuss physics, you want RF to confirm EF6/7 report?Duplicate of othersDone
36
NF, TF, CFRFXRF5DM ComplementarityRF, CF, EF, NF, TF3Topics are duplicates of other group'sXCF2?, XTF1EF-comment - merge with line 17 (CF agrees-- maybe expand line 17 to four hours?) RF: yes, that was the idea NF: Should we do two sessions (line 9 from NF and line 17 from CF or are these similar enough that we should merge them all? TF: Adding TF here to align with XCF2. Then this would cover the XTF1 request.Done
37
NFRFXRF6RF5 to discuss CLFV and neutrinosRF, NF2Relation between intensity frontier muon facilities (mu2e, etc) and nutrino facilitiesDone
38
CFRFXRF7RF1RF, CF2
large-volume data analysis and simulation and usage of HPC in data analysis
Done
39
AF, EFRFXRF8RF5 RF, EF, AF2to discuss CLFV and heavy statesXAF6EF Comment - which EF topical group would this belong to? AF comment :don't you want to have AF folks, too? RF: yes, we do want AF as well, please add. AF :agree, AF5 should take part in organizationDone
40
UF, NFRFXRF9RF4-NF5 double beta decayRF, NF, UF2Double Beta DecayXUF2
There are duplicate entries. NF: duplicates XNF6
Done
41
42
Frontier Signon
Requesting Frontier
Session NameInter Frontier ThemeToipcal Groups
Meeting Duration (hr)
Discussion TopicsIs Same As SessionCommentsStatus In Master Schedule
43
NFUFXUF1Long BaselineUF, NF1.5Discussion with DUNE community about what future underground needs are (planned or desired).UF: Do not see equivalent XNF sessionDone
44
NFUFXUF20nuBBUF, NF, RF1Discussion with 0nuBB neutrino community about what future underground needs are (planned or desired).XNF6, XRF9UF: Reworked row based on suggestion to add UF to XNF6. It probably means more time is needed and XNF6 only covers 0nuBB. Thus, create XUF2.5 in the next row.
45
NFUFXUF6Nu from Natural Sources (non-0nuBB)UF, NF, RF1Discussion with (non-DUNE, non-0nuBB) neutrino community about what future underground needs are (planned or desired).UF: New X session. It appears there may not be X-interest in this topic. Let's discuss.
46
CFUFXUF3Direct Detection Dark MatterUF, CF2XCF2?See XCF2 - waiting for confirmation thereDone
47
IFUFXUF4Cross-cutting and FacilitiesUF, IF2XCF1See XCF1Done
48
IFUFXUF5QISUF, IF1.5Discussion on the potential need, use, and requirements to support future quantum information science (QIS) platforms underground. This is especially relevant to superconducting qubits for quantum computing applications.UF: Do not see equivalent XIF session. Propose UF organize/host the "Underground QIS" disccussion. Key invited group is IF, but it might be a "general audience interest" discussion session. Email sent to IF suggesting UF would "just do this".Done
49
50
Frontier Signon
Requesting Frontier
Session NameInter Frontier ThemeToipcal Groups
Meeting Duration (hr)
Discussion TopicsIs Same As SessionCommentsStatus In Master Schedule
51
TF, EFAFXAF1ITF report and discussionAF, EF, TF4suggest to make it plenary, mb Day 2? part can be done in AF only. TF: happy to be involved if AF would find it useful.Done
52
TF, EFAFXAF2Muon collider Forum report and discussionAF, EF, TF4XEF4same as in the EF request. TF: was also TF request that didn't make it into this spreadsheet.Done
53
TF, EFAFXAF3e+e- collider Forum report and discussionAF, EF, TF4XEF7same as in the EF requestDone
54
AFEFXAF4UnstructuredEF, AF2XEF11(AF comment - just copied from EF - topic tbd)Done
55
NFNF, AFXAF5NF-AF Accelerator neutrino sources/cross-cutting issuesNF, AF2 or 4NF: same as line 14XNF8(AF comment - copied from NF list - for completeness)Done
56
RFAFXAF6RPF-AF Cross-cutting issuesAF, RF4XRF8?Done
57
AFXAF7CompF-AF Cross-cutting issuesAF, CompF2 or 4
58
AFXAF8"Accelerator Education and Training" colloqAF, Young, CEF2 or 4XIF2?tbd with Young Duplicate (moved to colloquia sheet)Done
59
AFXAF9Accelerator Technology spin-offs colloquiumAF, CEF 2 or (initial title "Success Stories from AF")XCEF3, XIF2?duplicate (Moved to colloquia sheet)Done
60
AFXAF10"Limits of Colliders" colloquiumAF, EF2 or 4Other possibility "Accelerator R&D in the US and Overseas" (tbd with EF)duplicate (on colloquia sheet)Done
61
62
Frontier Signon
Requesting Frontier
Session NameInter Frontier ThemeToipcal Groups
Meeting Duration (hr)
Discussion TopicsIs Same As SessionCommentsStatus In Master Schedule
63
NFTFXTF1TF, NF, RF4XNF5, XNF7, XRF2, XRF5TF: Need met by combination of XNF5, XNF7, XRF2, XRF5, propose to drop this session request in favor of XNF5, XNF7, XRF2, XRF5.Done
64
EFTFXTF2Energy Frontier TheoryTF, EF4XEF10Propose 4h instead of 2hDone
65
CFTFXTF3Cosmic Frontier TheoryTF, CF4CF Suggests: interplay of models, new ideas for analyses/experiments, and calculations with CF activities. TF response: sounds good, would also propose to emphasize non-DM aspects of CF/TF interface here (e.g. inflation etc.) since DM complementarity has its own cross-frontier activity.Done
66
CompFTFXTF4Quantum Information ScienceTF, CompF2Was originally proposed by TF as a panel
Done (on colloquia sheet)
67
68
Frontier Signon
Requesting Frontier
Session NameInter Frontier ThemeToipcal Groups
Meeting Duration (hr)
Discussion TopicsIs Same As SessionCommentsStatus In Master Schedule
69
EFXEF1EF Centric DiscussionsEF, CEF2Not needed - merge with line 28XCEF1same as CEF request on line 28, so can be merged with itDone
70
EFXEF2EF Centric DiscussionsEF, IF2merge with line 24XIF5same as IF request on line 24 by IF - so can be merged with themDone
71
CompFEFXEF3EF Centric DiscussionsEF, CompF2provide feedback on EF centered topics in CompF reportXEF8Done
72
AF, TFEFXEF4Muon Forum ReportEF, AF, TF4XAF2, XTF2TF: same as XAF2, but 2h vs 4hDone
73
IFEFXEF5Finalizing Plots & Tables, Detector Resolutions, etc.EF, IF2Really need to sync reports and plotsDone
74
AFEFXEF6Finalizing Plots and TablesEF, AF2ITF Folks from AFAF: what kind of people needed?Done
75
AF, TF, IFEFXEF7e+e- ForumEF, IF, AF, TF2e+e- ForumXAF3TF: same as XAF3, but 2h vs 4hDone
76
EFXEF8EF, CompF1same as line 70 - not neededXEF3Done
77
EFXEF9DiscussionsEF, IF2XIF5Already 4 hours with IFDone
78
EFXEF10DiscussionsEF, TF2Generic EF focused TF discussionXTF2Done
79
AFEFXEF11UnstructuredEF, AF2combined EF/AF report discussion, ef/af combined report? Lots of connections, so this is "in case"XAF4Done
80
TFEFXEF12EF Centric DiscussionsEF, TF2XTF2 TF: propose 4h vs 2hDone
81
EFXEF13EF Centric DiscussionsEF, RF2XRF1?, XRF2?, XRF4?Done
82
NFEFXEF14EF Centric DiscussionsEF, NF2NF: Same as line 7XNF2Done
83
EFXEF15EF Centric DiscussionsEF, CF2same as line 17 -- mergeXCF2Done
84
EFXEF16DiscussionsEf, TF2 meeting between EF05-07 and TF would be helpful to communicate about the physics prospects and theoretical computations in precision SM studies.XRF4XTF2??? is that enough?Done
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100