Account Options>

  1. Sign in
rubric_techplancritique_EDL-670-jan12
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
$
%
123
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
|
 
Still loading...
ABCDEF
1
Rubric for Technology Plan Critique
2
4321 or 0
3
CriterionExceptionalAcceptableMarginalUnacceptableScore
4
CompletenessYour critique includes the complete technology plan; fully describes the environment and the administrative and instructional applications; incorporates the 4 Cs of planning; and concludes with five or more recommendations for improvement.Your critique includes the technology plan; describes the environment and the administrative and instructional applications; incorporates the 4 Cs of planning; and concludes with at least four recommendations for improvement.Your critique includes a partial technology plan; somewhat describes the environment and the administrative and instructional applications; somewhat incorporates the 4 Cs of planning; and concludes with at least three recommendations for improvement.Your critique includes an incomplete technology plan; minimally describes the environment and the administrative and instructional applications; incorporates some of the 4 Cs of planning; and concludes with two or fewer recommendations for improvement.
5
Integration of 4 Cs of planningYou make clear reference to the 4 Cs of planning and integrate them well into your critique.You make reference to the 4 Cs of planning and integrate them into your critique.You make passing reference to the 4 Cs of planning and integrate them minimally into your critique.You make little if any reference to the 4 Cs of planning and integrate them poorly into your critique.
6
RecommendationsYour recommendations are relevant and clearly explained.Your recommendations are mostly relevant and adequately explained.Your recommendations are somewhat relevant and minimally explained.Your recommendations are minimally relevant and minimally explained.
7
Comments to othersYour comments to others demonstrate analysis of their posts and extend meaningful discussion by building on previous posts.Your comments to other elaborate on their postings and further the discussion.Your comments to others are mostly shallow (e.g., "I agree" or "I disagree") and do not enrich or further the discussion.You do not post comments to others.
8
ParticipationYou contribute regularly and on a timely basis, meet or exceed minimum requirement for replying to classmates, and always observe proper online etiquette (are respectful, courteous, and professional).You contribute occasionally and on a timely basis, meet the minimum requirement for replying to classmates, and observe proper online etiquette.You contribute infrequently and not on a timely basis and do not meet requirement for replying to classmates or always observe proper online etiquette.You do not contribute to discussion on a timely basis or observe proper online etiquette or both.
9
Total:
10
Copyright © 2012 by Thomas Edison State College. All rights reserved.
11
Note: Criteria are evaluated on a 4-3-2-1-0 basis. Total rubric points are converted first to a letter grade and then to a numerical equivalent based on a 0-100 scale.
12
Scale: 19-20 = A (93-100); 18 = A- (90-92); 17 = B+ (88-89); 14-16 = B (83-87); 13 = B- (80-82); 12 = C+ (78-79); 9-11 = C (73-77); 8 = C- (70-72); 4-7 = D (60-69); 0-3 = F (below 60).
Loading...
 
 
 
Written Assignment Rubric