| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | OUSD Town Hall survey | Responses: | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | [to auto-analyze: paste ONLY columns A-L of updated raw results at row 22 below] | Total | Average strength: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | Merger of Peralta and Sankofa at Sankofa | Answered: | 7 | Yes: | 144 | 4.25 | ||||||||||||||||||||
4 | Skipped: | 1 | No: | 22 | 1.18 | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | Reopen Santa Fe | Answered: | 6 | Yes: | 84 | 2.65 | ||||||||||||||||||||
7 | Skipped: | 2 | No: | 63 | 3.68 | |||||||||||||||||||||
8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | Relocate Kaiser to Santa Fe | Answered: | 6 | Yes: | 84 | 2.21 | ||||||||||||||||||||
10 | Skipped: | 2 | No: | 84 | 4.80 | |||||||||||||||||||||
11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | Build more classrooms at Kaiser | Answered: | 7 | Yes: | 113 | 3.88 | ||||||||||||||||||||
13 | Skipped: | 1 | No: | 33 | 1.03 | |||||||||||||||||||||
14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | Merger of Kaiser and Sankofa | Answered: | 7 | Yes: | 63 | 1.40 | ||||||||||||||||||||
16 | Skipped: | 1 | No: | 105 | 4.75 | |||||||||||||||||||||
17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | Add programs to schools that are targeted for closure | Answered: | 5 | Yes: | 84 | 4.23 | ||||||||||||||||||||
19 | Skipped: | 3 | No: | 42 | 2.52 | |||||||||||||||||||||
20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22 | OUSD Town Hall survey | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
23 | Q1. How strongly do you feel each proposal attends to each criterion (answer EITHER the "Yes" column OR the "No" column for each proposal and criterion)? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
24 | 1 (weak) | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 (very strong) | Total | "Yes" weighted average: | (weighted total:) | ||||||||||||||||||
25 | Equitable access to quality educational experiences available to all families at every school | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 14.29% | 1 | 85.71% | 6 | 7 | 4.857142857 | 34 | ||||||||||||
26 | Active commitment to transform racial and class differences in outcomes | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 100.00% | 7 | 7 | 5 | 35 | ||||||||||||
27 | Involving the most-impacted people in the decisions that affect them | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 28.57% | 2 | 0.00% | 0 | 71.43% | 5 | 7 | 4.428571429 | 31 | ||||||||||||
28 | Directing resources to where the need is | 0.00% | 0 | 14.29% | 1 | 14.29% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 71.43% | 5 | 7 | 4.285714286 | 30 | ||||||||||||
29 | Preserving the resources of the school district for district schools | 0.00% | 0 | 14.29% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 14.29% | 1 | 71.43% | 5 | 7 | 4.428571429 | 31 | ||||||||||||
30 | Care for students drives decisions and priorities | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 14.29% | 1 | 14.29% | 1 | 71.43% | 5 | 7 | 4.571428571 | 32 | ||||||||||||
31 | In all decisions, have consideration for students with special needs | 0.00% | 0 | 14.29% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 14.29% | 1 | 71.43% | 5 | 7 | 4.428571429 | 31 | ||||||||||||
32 | Care for school sites as assets of the district and the community | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 14.29% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 85.71% | 6 | 7 | 4.714285714 | 33 | ||||||||||||
33 | Make all decisions on the basis of data available to the community | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 14.29% | 1 | 14.29% | 1 | 71.43% | 5 | 7 | 4.571428571 | 32 | ||||||||||||
34 | Attends to relationships in community between parents and between schools | 0.00% | 0 | 14.29% | 1 | 14.29% | 1 | 14.29% | 1 | 57.14% | 4 | 7 | 4.142857143 | 29 | ||||||||||||
35 | Building on existing achievements in shaping future decisions | 14.29% | 1 | 14.29% | 1 | 14.29% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 57.14% | 4 | 7 | 3.714285714 | 26 | ||||||||||||
36 | A financially sustainable district that can care for all its priorities | 14.29% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 28.57% | 2 | 14.29% | 1 | 42.86% | 3 | 7 | 3.714285714 | 26 | ||||||||||||
37 | Finding constructive ways to address the controversies surrounding charter schools | 33.33% | 2 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 16.67% | 1 | 50.00% | 3 | 6 | 3.5 | 21 | ||||||||||||
38 | Addressing the root causes of under-enrollment | 14.29% | 1 | 28.57% | 2 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 57.14% | 4 | 7 | 3.571428571 | 25 | ||||||||||||
39 | Addressing the needs that charter schools are aiming to address | 50.00% | 3 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 50.00% | 3 | 6 | 3 | 18 | ||||||||||||
40 | Addressing the geographic distribution of schools within Oakland and the drawing of attendance boundaries to ensure equitable access | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 28.57% | 2 | 0.00% | 0 | 71.43% | 5 | 7 | 4.428571429 | 31 | ||||||||||||
41 | Prioritizing, attracting and retaining quality staff | 0.00% | 0 | 14.29% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 28.57% | 2 | 57.14% | 4 | 7 | 4.285714286 | 30 | ||||||||||||
42 | Acknowledgement of the complexity and interrelatedness of the systemic issues | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 42.86% | 3 | 14.29% | 1 | 42.86% | 3 | 7 | 4 | 28 | ||||||||||||
43 | School Community/Culture: Sustaining a welcoming, safe, connected, and rigorous environment within all schools and the community | 0.00% | 0 | 16.67% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 16.67% | 1 | 66.67% | 4 | 6 | 4.333333333 | 26 | ||||||||||||
44 | Capacity: Utilizing available funding to support adequate and stable staffing and the best possible care for the specific needs of students, families, teachers and administrators | 0.00% | 0 | 14.29% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 28.57% | 2 | 57.14% | 4 | 7 | 4.285714286 | 30 | ||||||||||||
45 | Enrollment: Evidence-based strategies to boost enrollment which are attentive to race impacts and community perceptions, aiming to build and sustain trust in the existence of care for families’ needs | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 28.57% | 2 | 71.43% | 5 | 7 | 4.714285714 | 33 | ||||||||||||
46 | Answered | 7 | Average strength: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
47 | Skipped | 1 | Total Yes: | 144 | 4.25 | |||||||||||||||||||||
48 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
49 | Merger of Peralta and Sankofa at Sankofa - No (scale 1-5 of strength) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
50 | 1 (weak) | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 (very strong) | Total | "No" weighted average: | (weighted total:) | ||||||||||||||||||
51 | Equitable access to quality educational experiences available to all families at every school | 100.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
52 | Active commitment to transform racial and class differences in outcomes | 100.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
53 | Involving the most-impacted people in the decisions that affect them | 100.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
54 | Directing resources to where the need is | 100.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
55 | Preserving the resources of the school district for district schools | 100.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
56 | Care for students drives decisions and priorities | 100.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
57 | In all decisions, have consideration for students with special needs | 100.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
58 | Care for school sites as assets of the district and the community | 100.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
59 | Make all decisions on the basis of data available to the community | 100.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
60 | Attends to relationships in community between parents and between schools | 100.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
61 | Building on existing achievements in shaping future decisions | 100.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
62 | A financially sustainable district that can care for all its priorities | 100.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
63 | Finding constructive ways to address the controversies surrounding charter schools | 50.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 50.00% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | ||||||||||||
64 | Addressing the root causes of under-enrollment | 100.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
65 | Addressing the needs that charter schools are aiming to address | 100.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
66 | Addressing the geographic distribution of schools within Oakland and the drawing of attendance boundaries to ensure equitable access | 100.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
67 | Prioritizing, attracting and retaining quality staff | 100.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
68 | Acknowledgement of the complexity and interrelatedness of the systemic issues | 100.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
69 | School Community/Culture: Sustaining a welcoming, safe, connected, and rigorous environment within all schools and the community | 100.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
70 | Capacity: Utilizing available funding to support adequate and stable staffing and the best possible care for the specific needs of students, families, teachers and administrators | 100.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
71 | Enrollment: Evidence-based strategies to boost enrollment which are attentive to race impacts and community perceptions, aiming to build and sustain trust in the existence of care for families’ needs | 100.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
72 | Answered | 7 | Average strength: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
73 | Skipped | 1 | Total No: | 22 | 1.18 | |||||||||||||||||||||
74 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
75 | Q2. How strongly do you feel each proposal attends to each criterion (answer EITHER the "Yes" column OR the "No" column for each proposal and criterion)? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
76 | 1 (weak) | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 (very strong) | Total | "Yes" weighted average: | (weighted total:) | ||||||||||||||||||
77 | Equitable access to quality educational experiences available to all families at every school | 50.00% | 2 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 4 | 2.5 | 10 | ||||||||||||
78 | Active commitment to transform racial and class differences in outcomes | 50.00% | 2 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 4 | 2.5 | 10 | ||||||||||||
79 | Involving the most-impacted people in the decisions that affect them | 25.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 50.00% | 2 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 4 | 3 | 12 | ||||||||||||
80 | Directing resources to where the need is | 50.00% | 2 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 4 | 2.5 | 10 | ||||||||||||
81 | Preserving the resources of the school district for district schools | 25.00% | 1 | 25.00% | 1 | 25.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 4 | 2.75 | 11 | ||||||||||||
82 | Care for students drives decisions and priorities | 25.00% | 1 | 25.00% | 1 | 25.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 4 | 2.75 | 11 | ||||||||||||
83 | In all decisions, have consideration for students with special needs | 25.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 50.00% | 2 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 4 | 3 | 12 | ||||||||||||
84 | Care for school sites as assets of the district and the community | 25.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 50.00% | 2 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 4 | 3 | 12 | ||||||||||||
85 | Make all decisions on the basis of data available to the community | 50.00% | 2 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 4 | 2.5 | 10 | ||||||||||||
86 | Attends to relationships in community between parents and between schools | 25.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 50.00% | 2 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 4 | 3 | 12 | ||||||||||||
87 | Building on existing achievements in shaping future decisions | 50.00% | 2 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 4 | 2.5 | 10 | ||||||||||||
88 | A financially sustainable district that can care for all its priorities | 50.00% | 2 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 4 | 2.5 | 10 | ||||||||||||
89 | Finding constructive ways to address the controversies surrounding charter schools | 50.00% | 2 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 4 | 2.5 | 10 | ||||||||||||
90 | Addressing the root causes of under-enrollment | 50.00% | 2 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 4 | 2.5 | 10 | ||||||||||||
91 | Addressing the needs that charter schools are aiming to address | 50.00% | 2 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 4 | 2.5 | 10 | ||||||||||||
92 | Addressing the geographic distribution of schools within Oakland and the drawing of attendance boundaries to ensure equitable access | 50.00% | 2 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 4 | 2.5 | 10 | ||||||||||||
93 | Prioritizing, attracting and retaining quality staff | 50.00% | 2 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 4 | 2.5 | 10 | ||||||||||||
94 | Acknowledgement of the complexity and interrelatedness of the systemic issues | 25.00% | 1 | 25.00% | 1 | 25.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 4 | 2.75 | 11 | ||||||||||||
95 | School Community/Culture: Sustaining a welcoming, safe, connected, and rigorous environment within all schools and the community | 25.00% | 1 | 25.00% | 1 | 25.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 4 | 2.75 | 11 | ||||||||||||
96 | Capacity: Utilizing available funding to support adequate and stable staffing and the best possible care for the specific needs of students, families, teachers and administrators | 50.00% | 2 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 4 | 2.5 | 10 | ||||||||||||
97 | Enrollment: Evidence-based strategies to boost enrollment which are attentive to race impacts and community perceptions, aiming to build and sustain trust in the existence of care for families’ needs | 25.00% | 1 | 25.00% | 1 | 25.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.00% | 1 | 4 | 2.75 | 11 | ||||||||||||
98 | Answered | 6 | Average strength: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
99 | Skipped | 2 | Total Yes: | 84 | 2.65 | |||||||||||||||||||||
100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||