Sprint5_Testing
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

View only
 
 
ABCDNOPQRSTUV
1
10/12/2018 - Testing . Sprint 3P1P2P3Possible solutionNotes
2
3
Says something about the nameSubmit my Application (not my Plan)
4
The landing page is not clear enough. Is it only for submission? How can I know I can also find out about my site constraints?
5
Expected to sign in before finding out about a siteAfter site constraints page, go back to app/pre-app/find out about a site
P2 did not want to sign in until they were ready to submit an application.
6
Confused by not naming an applicationN/AN/AN/ANot tested
7
Didn't understand not having to choose an applicantion type before starting the processAll asked when they had to choose the type of app.
8
Understands the purpose of find out about a siteP2 was't clear about the level of detailed info on the map
9
Says something positive about the constraint finder page umprompted
10
Thinks info is missing on the constraints finder pageInfo you could browse on the mapP3 would like to have access to local policy maps, Article 4D and PTAL (Public transport accessibility level) data, applications nearby, planning history (description, reasons why it was rejected when clicking on that app)
11
Has doubts about the info displayed on the constraints finder page.P3 wouldn't trust the detials: size, use.
12
Uses 'share by email' buttonP3 suggested "Download as a PDF" or provide a link
13
Sees benefits on having the option to download the OS mapDrawing tool What if you plan to change the red boundary?
14
Ask for help with finding where to start an application on the dashboard
15
Confused by the switching feature on dashboardReorder apps by location in app list (dashboard)nobody recognised teh switching feature but also preferred to see all the apps on one page.
16
The user experiences flow
17
Compairs to Planning Portal (in a negative way)
18
Would consider use a phoneN/AN/AN/ANot tested
19
Would like to have multiple log in for 1 single accountAll participans have 1 single login (but they understand that for big practices it would be useful)
20
Would use 'share app with client'Concers about clients making changes.
21
Understands the question "are you an agent" in the sign inAccount details shouldn't be linked to the person signing the app.
22
Agress with the labels on apps list (dashboard)P3 would prefer: In progress, Submitted, Decided Not useful to keep record of apps submitted long ago. In case you would need them, you could go to the site constraints page, and download the app form from previous apps
23
24
25
Notes from P1 & P2 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QiNrWYxNEfZuejw5NTfyMgHf4IiuZlXZ86bMKBe83Nk/edit#
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
Loading...
Main menu