A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Spreadsheet started June 25, 2016 by Robert Sulej, not updated in a while. See https://web.fnal.gov/collaboration/DUNE/SitePages/ProtoDUNEs%20simulation%20and%20reconstruction%20activities.aspx for more recent info. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | Task | what data is needed | space-charge can affect | beamline/window sensitive (todo: details on needed beamline instrumentation, e.g. for PID, wether beam plug needed) | reco tools notes | MCC7 ProtoDUNE sample available at: http://dune-data.fnal.gov/mc/mcc7/index.html | who would like to work on it? (free to edit, most tasks contain several parts that can be done in collaboration of gropus, please, sign up even if names are already in box interesting to you) | |||||||||||||||||||
3 | Development of calibration procedures and data-MC studies required for FD physics | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | electron shower: 1) energy resolution (proves instrumental resolution), 2) energy scale | e beam, range of momenta | √ | √ need beam plug | need work on cosmic mu subtraction (never tried) | electrons, range of momenta | C.-J. Lin | |||||||||||||||||||
5 | muon energy scale | mu beam, range of momenta | √ | √ | ~ready for calorimetry; no tools for multiple culomb scattering (MCS can be very difficult with space charge deformations) | beam mu+ 1 GeV/c, may need range of p up to high values | Ajib Paudel, Fabio Spagliardi (see ProtoDUNE simulation and reconstruction web page) | |||||||||||||||||||
6 | hadron energy scale at different complexity of hadronic shower topology (incl. studies of EM fraction - listed in "physics" goals) | hadron beam, range of momenta | √ | √ (need PID & momentum; no beam window OK for partial program) | tools OK for single tracks and small track systems, need track system classification (how many classes, consider calib. factors for each); need to subtract mu as well | p 1GeV/c (MCC6) 2GeV/c, K 1GeV/c, pi+ 200MeV/c (MCC6), pi+ 2GeV/c; range of p up to high values on request | P. Sala.( Available: FLUKA simulations) | |||||||||||||||||||
7 | missing energy in hadron events (part of energy scale study, important, therefore listed as a separate task), can be considered as a "physics" goal as well | hadron beam, 1-5GeV or higher | p 1GeV/c (MCC6) 2GeV/c, K 1GeV/c, pi+ 200MeV/c (MCC6), pi+ 2GeV/c; | P. Guzowski, P. Sala (Available: FLUKA simulations) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | absolute ADC to energy calibration (cosmic mu, pi0's from beam events), uniformity (e.g. using cosmic muons) | cosmic mu, pi0's, stopping beam particles (protons) | √ | need precise pi0 reco | pi+ 2 GeV/c; cosmic mu simulation (separate and overlayed with beam events) - not part of MCC7, please ask for directions | Muons: Ajib Paudel, Fabio Spagliardi (see ProtoDUNE simulation and reconstruction web page) | ||||||||||||||||||||
9 | diffusion, E-field response (signal induction), noise effects --> study of deconvolution and image pattern recognition capabilities in real data | 1-5GeV/c hadr. beam, cosmic muons (tracks, pi0 vertices) | pi+ 2 GeV/c, should be OK for start of interaction vertex region study (and many other features of events affected by effects studied in this task) | M. Mooney (& BNL) X. Li (Stony Brook) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | e/gamma separation (1 - use photons from pi0's) | pions, 1-5GeV/c (use pi0 vertices and dE/dx of gamma cascades); | √ (dE/dx) | vertex reco OK, ongoing work on EM cascade ID (easier than full pi0 reco) | pi+ 2 GeV/c | D.Stefan, R.Sulej | ||||||||||||||||||||
11 | e/gamma separation (2 - use electrons) | starting part of electron cascades | √ | √ need beam plug | simple tools for dE/dx in well defined position of cascade start | range of electron momenta | D.Stefan, R.Sulej | |||||||||||||||||||
12 | recombination angular dependecy | protons, 1-2GeV/c (use secondary stopping protons) | √ | ~ready | p 2GeV/c (1GeV/c in MCC6) | |||||||||||||||||||||
13 | PID (stopping or low energy) | hadrons up to 1GeV/c; secondary particles in any momenta beam | √ | √ need PID for involved species | ~ready | MCC6: p 1GeV/c, K 1GeV/c, pi+ 200MeV/c, mu+ 200MeV/c - those have stoppers and most features needed for PID in low energy; MCC7: p, pi+ at 2GeV, more interactions | ||||||||||||||||||||
14 | stopping/decaying muons: 1) calibration with Michel electrons and stopping mu features; 2) muon capture detection for charge identification | cosmic and beam muons, momenta allowing to stop in TPC | √ | cosmic mu sample (includes plenty of stoppers), mu+ 200MeV/c (MCC6) | J. Brown(?), R. Sulej, D. Stefan | |||||||||||||||||||||
15 | Michel electrons for supernova (tools the same as for the above row, should be easy to reuse most work) | cosmic and beam muons, momenta allowing to stop in TPC | √ | available cosmic mu sample (includes plenty of stoppers), mu+ 200MeV/c; | ||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | ? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | ProtoDUNE physics | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | EM fraction in hadronic shower for shower energy estimation (i.e. separate treatment of EM component and hadron tracks) | hadron beam 1-5GeV/c | EM/track ID coming now (efficiency>96%) | p, K 1GeV/c, pi+ 200 MeV/c (MCC6); p, pi+ 2GeV/c (MCC7) | P. Sala | |||||||||||||||||||||
19 | multiplicity in hadronic interactions, exclusive crossections (inlc. pi0 production models) | hadron beam 1-5GeV/c | Laura Manenti | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20 | pi interaction crossections, if statistics is enough one can look for features due to resonances production | hadr. beam 0.5-xxGeV/c | √ PID needed to mu vs pi, pi vs K and protons | ~ready and can improve where needed | pi+ 200 MeV/c (MCC6); pi+ 2GeV/c (MCC7) | Jarek Nowak, S. Bordoni | ||||||||||||||||||||
21 | hadron shower topology, development of showers: compare with MC models | hadr. beam 1- ~5GeV/c | P. Sala | |||||||||||||||||||||||
22 | kaons (identification, crosections, ...): very interesting, can be difficult to obtain primary kaons with momentum; can count on secondary; please, sign up if you are interested | hadr beam <= 1GeV/c, kaons in secondaries in high energy beam | √ (PID) | ~ready and can improve where needed | K 1GeV/c | Pablo Fernandez (see ProtoDUNEs simulation and reconstruction activities page) | ||||||||||||||||||||
23 | anti-protons or other exotic measurements? | what is needed? let us know, straight-forward to generate and run reconstruction | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
24 | ? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
25 | ProtoDUNE detector performance & monitoring | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
26 | reconstruction algorithms performance and energy (and any other) dependencies | tools are existing and being developed | need range of p, with SCE, with cosmic mu overlaid | D.Stefan, R.Sulej (contributing, since working on reconstruction anyway, please sign up with us) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
27 | photon detector characterization studies | 35t experience and tools for SP | Bruce Howard | |||||||||||||||||||||||
28 | integrate data from beamline detectors, triggers (beam&cosmic) in the reconstruction: test beam particle hierarchy tuned to include informaton on the beam particle entry point/direction, cosmic mu reconstruction, ... | untouched, potentialy LArIAT experience can be ported | beam particle simulations for development of particle hierarchy reco with known beam orientation; | Wes | ||||||||||||||||||||||
29 | integrate space charge monitoring (lasers or muons) with the reconstruction | depends on solution, e.g. muon taggers for space charge calibration | need simulation of such monitoring tools... | M. Mooney, K. McDonald | ||||||||||||||||||||||
30 | develop tools for APA-to-APA alignment that can use beam muons, beam halo muons and cosmic muons (in FD we're going to have muons in beam direction from nm and cosmic m as well so tools can be reused) | untouched, potentially can use 35t developments ("gap studies") | cosmic mu simulation | |||||||||||||||||||||||
31 | cosmic muons reconstruction, association of EM activity to muons, identification and reconstruction of mu with brems (need to develop tools important for mu background rejection/subtraction in analysis of protoDUNE test beam data; such tools are also needed in nucleon decay searches in FD) | work only started for this size of detector | cosmic mu simulation (quite enough for start); overlay with beam events - please, ask for directions to files | Dorota with Elizabeth, L. Whitehead | ||||||||||||||||||||||
32 | purity monitoring with muons | various approaches can be ported (e.g. 35t) | cosmic mu simulation | J. Hugon | ||||||||||||||||||||||
33 | green box: goal possible to achieve in any scenario (e.g. beam window cfg, or space-charge monitoring tools), with possibility to extend outcome depending on available calibration tools and beam wnd design; yellow box: monitoring and detector performance tasks (required to obtain usable data for analysis) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
34 | Location of MC samples: /mnt/nas00/software/protoDUNE_June_ws | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
35 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
36 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
37 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
38 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
39 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
41 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
42 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
43 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
44 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
45 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
46 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
47 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
48 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
49 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
50 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
51 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
52 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
53 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
54 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
55 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
56 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
58 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
59 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
60 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
61 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
62 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
63 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
64 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
65 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
66 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
67 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
68 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
69 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
71 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
72 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
73 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
74 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
75 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
76 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
77 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
78 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
79 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
80 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
81 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
82 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
83 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
85 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
86 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
87 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
88 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
89 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
90 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
91 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
92 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
93 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
94 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
95 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
96 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
97 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
98 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
99 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
100 |