| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | RIZVI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | NBA SAR CALCULATOR | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | Criteria | Statement | Points | Evaluation | Expected | Status | ||||||||||||||||||||
8 | 1 | Vision, Mission and Program Educational Objectives | 60 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | 1 | 1 | State the Vision and Mission of the Department and Institution | 5 | Availability of the Vision & Mission statements of the Department (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||
10 | Appropriateness/Relevance of the Statements (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
11 | Consistency of the Department statements with the Institute statements (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | 1 | 2 | State the Program Educational Objectives (PEOs) | 5 | Listing of the Program Educational Objectives (3 to 5) of the program under consideration (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||
13 | 1 | 3 | Indicate where the Vision, Mission and PEOs are Published and Disseminated among Stakeholders | 10 | Adequacy in respect of publication & dissemination (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||
14 | Process of dissemination among stakeholders (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | Extent of awareness of Vision, Mission & PEOs among the stakeholder (6) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | 1 | 4 | State the Process for Defining the Vision and Mission of the Department, and PEOs of the Program | 25 | Description of process involved in defining the Vision, Mission of the Department (10) | |||||||||||||||||||||
17 | Description of process involved in defining the PEOs of the program (15) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | 1 | 5 | State the Process for Defining the Vision and Mission of the Department, and PEOs of the Program | 15 | Preparation of a matrix of PEOs and elements of Mission statement (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||
19 | Consistency/justification of co-relation parameters of the above matrix (10) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
20 | Criteria 1 Total | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
21 | 2 | Program Curriculum and Teaching –Learning Processes | 120 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
22 | 2 | 1 | Program Curriculum | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
23 | 2 | 1 | 1 | State the Process used to Identify Extent of Compliance of the University Curriculum for Attaining the Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes as Mentioned in Appendix I of SAR . Also Mention the Identified Curricular Gaps, if any | 10 | Process used to identify extent of compliance of university curriculum for attaining POs & PSOs (6) | ||||||||||||||||||||
24 | List the curricular gaps for the attainment of defined POs & PSOs (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
25 | 2 | 1 | 2 | State the Delivery Details of the Content Beyond the Syllabus for Attainment of POs and PSOs | 10 | Steps taken to get identified gaps included in the curriculum.(e.g. letter to university/BOS) (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||
26 | Delivery details of content beyond syllabus (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
27 | Mapping of content beyond syllabus with the POs & PSOs (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
28 | 2 | 2 | Teaching - Learning Processes | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
29 | 2 | 2 | 1 | Describe Processes Followed to Improve Quality of Teaching & Learning | 25 | Adherence to Academic Calendar (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||
30 | Use of various instructional methods and pedagogical initiatives (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
31 | Methodologies to support weak students and encourage bright students(4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
32 | Quality of classroom teaching (Observation in a Class) (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
33 | Conduct of experiments (Observation in Lab) (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
34 | Continuous Assessment in the laboratory (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
35 | Student feedback of teaching learning process and actions taken (6) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
36 | 2 | 2 | 2 | Quality of Internal Semester Question papers, Assignments and Evaluation | 20 | Process for internal semester question paper setting and evaluation and effective process implementation (5) | ||||||||||||||||||||
37 | Process to ensure questions from outcomes/learning levels perspective (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
38 | Evidence of COs coverage in class test / mid-term tests (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
39 | Quality of Assignment and its relevance to COs (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
40 | 2 | 2 | 3 | Quality of Student Projects | 25 | Identification of projects and allocation methodology to Faculty Members (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||
41 | Types and relevance of the projects and their contribution towards attainment of POs and PSOs(5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
42 | Process for monitoring and evaluation (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
43 | Process to assess individual and team performance (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
44 | Quality of completed projects/working prototypes (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
45 | Evidences of papers published /Awards received by projects etc. (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
46 | 2 | 2 | 4 | Initiatives related to Industry Interaction | 15 | Industry supported laboratories (5) | ||||||||||||||||||||
47 | Industry involvement in the program design and partial delivery of any regular courses for students (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
48 | Impact analysis of industry institute interaction and actions taken thereof (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
49 | 2 | 2 | 5 | Initiatives related to Industry Internship / Summer Training | 15 | Industrial training/tours for students (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||
50 | Industrial /internship /summer training of more than two weeks and post training Assessment (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
51 | Impact analysis of industrial training (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
52 | Student feedback on initiative (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
53 | Criteria 2 Total | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
54 | 3 | Course Outcomes (CO) and Program Outcomes (PO) | 120 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
55 | 3 | 1 | Establish the Correlation between the Courses and the Program Outcomes (POs) and Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs) | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
56 | 3 | 1 | 1 | Course Outcomes (COs) (SAR should include course outcomes of one course from each semester of study, however, should be prepared for all courses and made available as evidence, if asked) | 5 | Evidence of COs being defined for every course (5) | ||||||||||||||||||||
57 | 3 | 1 | 2 | CO-PO matrices of courses selected in 3.1.1 (six matrices to be mentioned; one per semester from 3rd to 8th semester) | 5 | Explanation of table to be ascertained (5) | ||||||||||||||||||||
58 | 3 | 1 | 3 | Program Level Course-PO Matrix of all Courses INCLUDING First Year Courses | 10 | Explanation of tables to be ascertained (10) | ||||||||||||||||||||
59 | 3 | 2 | Attainment of Course Outcomes | 50 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
60 | 3 | 2 | 1 | Describe the Assessment Processes used to Gather the Data upon which the Evaluation of Course Outcome is based | 10 | List of assessment processes (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||
61 | The quality /relevance of assessment processes & tools used (8) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
62 | 3 | 2 | 2 | Record the Attainment of Course Outcomes of all Courses with respect to Set Attainment Levels | 40 | Verify the attainment levels as per the benchmark set for all courses (40) | ||||||||||||||||||||
63 | 3 | 3 | Attainment of Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes | 50 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
64 | 3 | 3 | 1 | Describe Assessment Tools and Processes Used for Measuring the Attainment of each of the Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes | 10 | List of assessment tools & processes (5) | ||||||||||||||||||||
65 | The quality/relevance of assessment tools/processes used (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
66 | 3 | 3 | 2 | Provide Results of Evaluation of each PO & PSO | 40 | Verification of documents, results and level of attainment of each PO/PSO (24) | ||||||||||||||||||||
67 | Overall levels of attainment (16 marks) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
68 | Criteria 3 Total | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
69 | 4 | Students’ Performance | 150 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
70 | 4 | 1 | Enrolment Ratio (20) Enrolment Ratio= N1/N | 20 | FORMULA | |||||||||||||||||||||
71 | 4 | 2 | Success Rate in the Stipulated Period of the Program | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
72 | 4 | 2 | 1 | Success rate without backlogs in any Semester/year of study Without Backlog means no compartment or failures in any semester/year of study | 25 | FORMULA | ||||||||||||||||||||
73 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Success rate in stipulated period (actual duration of the program) | 15 | FORMULA | ||||||||||||||||||||
74 | 4 | 3 | Academic Performance in Third Year | 15 | FORMULA | |||||||||||||||||||||
75 | 4 | 4 | Academic Performance in Second Year | 15 | FORMULA | |||||||||||||||||||||
76 | 4 | 5 | Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship | 40 | FORMULA | |||||||||||||||||||||
77 | 4 | 6 | Professional Activities | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
78 | 4 | 6 | 1 | Professional Societies / Chapters and Organizing Engineering Events | 5 | Availability & activities of professional societies/chapters (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||
79 | Number, quality of engineering events (organized at institute) (2) (Level - Institute/State/National/International) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
80 | 4 | 6 | 2 | Publication of Technical Magazines, Newsletters, etc. | 5 | Quality & Relevance of the contents and Print Material (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||
81 | Participation of Students from the program (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
82 | 4 | 6 | 3 | Participation in Inter-institution Events by Students of the Program of Study | 10 | Events within the state (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||
83 | Events outside the state (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
84 | Prizes/awards received in such events (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
85 | Criteria 4 Total | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
86 | 5 | Faculty Information and Contributions | 200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
87 | 5 | 1 | Student-Faculty Ratio (SFR) | 20 | FORMULA | |||||||||||||||||||||
88 | 5 | 2 | Faculty Cadre Proportion | 25 | FORMULA | |||||||||||||||||||||
89 | 5 | 3 | Faculty Qualification | 25 | FORMULA | |||||||||||||||||||||
90 | 5 | 4 | Faculty Retention | 25 | FORMULA | |||||||||||||||||||||
91 | 5 | 5 | Innovations by the Faculty in Teaching and Learning | 20 | The work must be made available on Institute Website (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||
92 | The work must be available for peer review and critique (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
93 | The work must be reproducible and developed further by other scholars (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
94 | Statement of clear goals, use of appropriate methods, significance of results, effective presentation and reflective critique (10) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
95 | 5 | 6 | Faculty as participants in Faculty development /training activities /STTPs | 15 | FORMULA | |||||||||||||||||||||
96 | 5 | 7 | Research and Development | 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
97 | 5 | 7 | 1 | Academic Research | 10 | Number of quality publications in refereed/SCI Journals, citations, Books/Book Chapters etc. (6) | ||||||||||||||||||||
98 | PhD guided /PhD awarded during the assessment period while working in the institute (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
99 | 5 | 7 | 2 | Sponsored Research | 5 | FORMULA | ||||||||||||||||||||
100 | 5 | 7 | 3 | Development Activities | 10 | Product Development | ||||||||||||||||||||