ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
General Purpose Fund, Comparison of Financial Position 2024 vs. 2020. UPDATED MAY 22, 2024)
Data Sources:
https://oaklandca.opengov.com/transparency#
2
Oakland Fiscal Year (FY) runs July 1 to June 30. For example, FY 2024 means July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1kU7PPfHQJIabEi8daOMIqnxQu_CFuQ0V&usp=drive_fs
3
4
2024 GPF Financial Summary
Explanation
5
GPF 2024 budgeted revenue, including use of 2023 fund balance$834,121,344In FY2020, the City was running a 5.6% operating deficit in the GPF. By 2024, this deficit had expanded by another 11.9% in real dollars due to a decline in revenue (a 7.8% real dollar decline) and an increase in expenses (a 2.6% real dollar increase). The net impact is a $111M structural (ongoing operations) deficit in 2024 (16% of budgeted revenues).

When including one-time adjustments (carry over of 2023 expenses) this defict increases to $165M (23% of budgeted revenues). But carry-over expenses are not structural deficit because they are just a deferal of unpaid obligations from the prior-year budget. Thus the deficit of primary concern is the structural deficit.

COVID emergency funding masked this structural deficit problem with an influx of federal and state one-time funding (ARPA and CARES), and even exacerbated it by allowing expenses to jump during COVID years. All GPF funded departments saw an average increase in operating expenses of 14% in real dollars since 2020, except for the police which saw a 16% cut, and workforce dev wich saw a 2% cut. These increases generally focused on dramatic expansion of social services, such as (for example) a nutrition program extablished using COVID emergency funding but not subsequently withdrawn after exhaustion of that funding.

This was followed by 'austerity' measures in the 2023-2025 budget to rectify both the starting operating deficit and COVID-era spending expansion. These austerity measures included freezing open positions, declaring a state of "extreme fiscal necessiry" to allow use of Vital Services Stabilization Fund (VSSF) reserves and use of GPF fund balances to cover ongoing operating expenses. (Such reserves, in general, should be used only for one-time expenses.)

However, such austerity measures were insufficient. Revenue expectations in the budget were based on continuation of historically high real-estate transactions and associated taxes, and did not account for the post-COVID business downturn (reduced business licenses, sales taxes, and transient occupancy taxes). Such declines are due to the high interest rates, inflation, and public safety problems.

Of the $111M structural deficit, only $40M was anticipated in the budgeting process. Thus the City now faces an unresolved $92M operating deficit for 2024.

Because the City is not allowed to run deficits or issue debt to cover such deficits, the unresolved deficit must be addressed through additional operational cuts in the next 3 months, or use of any remaining GPF Fund Balances.

Presently there is only $8M of unassigned GPF fund balance remaining, which may be applied to the deficit under the current 'extreme fiscal necessity' and an additional $65M of GPF Emergency Reserve Funding that has not yet been tapped. That $65M is intended only for extreme seemingly insurmountable events war or a natural disaster. While it is debatable whether the City is in such a situation, the City Council has the power, via a new Resolution, to override the Fiscal Policy it previously set and use those Emergency funds regardless.

While we anticipate that the City will be tempted to do exactly such an act, it is tempered by another issue: it will not resolve the structural deficit. Thus the City will face the full spectre of the $145M total structural defict in 2025, with no emergency reserve funds left to cover it or to cover unanticipated emergencies like natural disasters.

Thus we anticipate that the City will necessarily cut expenses in a dramatic fashion, cuts amounting to approximately 16% of presently budgeted GPF expenses. Such cuts will come on top of departments already running 16% below approved operating staff, and the previously-mentioned 16% real decline in police budget.

Given the severity of such necessary cuts, an even reduction in staff across deparements may not be sufficient. It will be necessary for the city to reconsider whether it can maintain new departments and functions established in the past 5 years.
6
GPF 2024 budgeted expenses$834,121,344
7
Fiscal year end forecast (estimated on May 22, 2024)
8
GPF 2024 forecasted revenue (with use of reserves)$705,400,000
9
GPF 2024 forecasted expenses$816,000,000
10
GPF 2024 forecasted adjusted expenses (with carry-overs)$871,000,000
includes $55M of carry-overs & unplanned expenses
11
GPF 2024 forecasted income-$110,600,000
structural deficit
12
GPF 2024 forecasted adjusted income-$165,600,000
total deficit including carry-overs
13
GPF 2024 forecasted income (relative to actual revenue)-15.7%
structural deficit
14
GPF 2024 forecasted adjusted income (relative to actual revenue)-23.5%
total deficit including carry-overs paid by prior-year fund balance
15
Use of remaining VSSF balance$10,300,000
budgeted transfer from VSSF
16
2024 Use of Funds for budgeted for operating expenses$30,120,000
budgeted transfer from 2023 year-end GPF fund balance
17
2024 Use of Funds for carry overs$55,240,000
planned transfer from 2023 year-end GPF fund balance
18
2024 Use of Funds for budgeted for operating expenses$7,920,000
unbudgeted transfer of remaining General Fund Balance
19
Forecasted June 30, 2024 GPF net position without mitigating actions
-$62,020,000
unresolved deficit
20
21
Deficit Mitigation Plan (as of May 22, 2024)
22
New Revenue: Use of Colosseum sale proceeds$42,020,000
City claims it will close before June 30
23
New Expense: Cancellation of carry-over expenses and transfer of CIP projects to General Fund
-$30,000,000
24
New Expense: Contingency expenses$10,000,000
25
Remaining deficit$0
26
27
Remaining one-time funds available to GPF
28
Proposed sale of Colosseum$62,980,000
29
GPF Emergency Reserve$65,410,000
City has not indicated any plan to use this as of May 2024
30
31
32
2020 GPF Financial Summary
33
GPF 2020 budgeted revenue$631,755,460
34
GPF 2020 budgeted expenses$631,755,460
35
actuals
36
GPF 2020 actual revenue$630,920,000
37
GPF 2020 actual expenses$666,271,934
38
GPF 2020 actual adjusted expenses$689,491,934
39
GPF 2020 actual income-$35,351,934
40
GPF 2020 actual adjusted income-$58,571,934
41
GPF 2020 actual income (relative to actual revenue)-5.6%
42
GPF 2020 actual adjusted income (relative to actual revenue)-9.3%
43
44
2024 DEFICIT COMPONENTS - SUMMARY
45
in 2020 dollars ------------------------
46
47
Structural deficit componentRelative to 2020 actual revenues
48
Starting income (2020 actuals)-5.6%
initial structural deficit (actual revenue vs actual expense)
49
Revenue change (2024 v 2020)-7.8%
2024 forecasted revenue vs 2020 actual revenue
50
Expense change (2024 v 2020)2.6%
2024 forecasted expenses vs 2020 actual expense
51
Forecasted 2024 relative net income-16.0%
relative to 2020 revenue basis
52
53
Total deficit component
54
2024 adjusted expense additions7.3%
2024 carry-over expense vs 2024 forecasted expenses
55
Forecasted 2024 relative adjusted net income-23.4%
56
57
58
in 2024 dollars ------------------------
59
60
Structural deficit componentRelative to 2024 budgeted revenues
61
Starting income (2020 actuals)-5.1%
initial structural deficit (actual revenue vs actual expense)
62
Revenue change (2024 v 2020)-7.0%
2024 forecasted revenue vs 2020 actual revenue
63
Expense change (2024 v 2020)2.4%
2024 forecasted expenses vs 2020 actual expense
64
Forecasted 2024 relative net income-14.5%
relative to 2020 revenue basis
65
66
Total deficit component
67
2024 adjusted expense additions5.4%
2024 carry-over expense vs 2024 forecasted expenses
68
Forecasted 2024 relative adjusted net income-19.9%
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100