ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
2
TimestampWhat class do you represent?Would you like FMOTQ to be replaced, minorly changed, or stay as is?Can you elaborate on your response?What ideas do you have, if any, for a new Stanford tradition different from FMOTQ?If changes are made, what do you think of the following changes: [Earlier in the night]If changes are made, what do you think of the following changes: [No nudity]If changes are made, what do you think of the following changes: [No alcohol]If changes are made, what do you think of the following changes: [No LSJUMB]If changes are made, what do you think of the following changes: [No music]If changes are made, what do you think of the following changes: [A jazz band]If changes are made, what do you think of the following changes: [Separate kissing and non-kissing zones]
3
3/7/2016 21:29:01Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAgree
4
3/7/2016 21:29:21Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventAmbivalentAgreeAgreeAmbivalentDisagreeAmbivalentAgree
5
3/7/2016 21:29:57Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventAmbivalentDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalentDisagreeAgreeAmbivalent
6
3/7/2016 21:29:59Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventAmbivalentDisagreeAgreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalentAgree
7
3/7/2016 21:31:13Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventI would advocate for less rules and strict times and more sober monitors/oversightI have many but this is a wonderful event that does not need replacingDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalentAmbivalentDisagreeAmbivalentAmbivalent
8
3/7/2016 21:31:32Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventDisagreeAgreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalentAgree
9
3/7/2016 21:31:58Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventKissing hella people spreads diseases, right?noneDisagreeAmbivalentAmbivalentDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalent
10
3/7/2016 21:32:00Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventthink the idea of seniors giving freshmen roses is really cute! maybe reinstate flowers?DisagreeAgreeAmbivalentAmbivalentDisagreeAmbivalentDisagree
11
3/7/2016 21:32:35Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventCould have other events or options for students not interested in FMOTQ as it is, but still want to participate in a fun eventAmbivalentAmbivalentAmbivalentAmbivalentDisagreeAgreeAgree
12
3/7/2016 21:32:43Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventI would like it to last more than 20 minutes past midnight, but I love how safe, open, and accepting it feels. As a woman on campus, it can be hard to find parties with as much emphasis on consent and safety in addition to fun. DisagreeDisagreeAmbivalentDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalent
13
3/7/2016 21:32:44Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventWe do a pretty good job of keeping the high schoolers out, but for me the uncomfortable experiences come from the way older male grad students who don't seem to understand the word no. Any way to create a separate event for them or make it undergrad only?dance party on the quad? DisagreeAmbivalentAgreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalent
14
3/7/2016 21:32:46Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalentAgree
15
3/7/2016 21:33:02Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventFMOTQ is such an engrained part of Stanford's culture that if it were "replaced" by the administration, it would happen underground. That would be dangerous. A lot more alcohol abuse, a lot more participants unaffiliated with the university, and lot less discussion of consent and safety. FMOTQ is part of what makes Stanford so amazing. Keep it! DisagreeAmbivalentDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalentAmbivalent
16
3/7/2016 21:33:10Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventAgree
17
3/7/2016 21:33:52Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAgreeDisagreeAgreeAgree
18
3/7/2016 21:34:44Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventGoing back to the original tradition of seniors giving freshmen a rose or something. Taking the event back to being a way of welcoming freshmen. Also, more music!DisagreeAgreeAmbivalentDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAgree
19
3/7/2016 21:34:53Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventI don't care deeply about the event, so I don't have loads to say one way or another. I feel like the start of the tradition was cute--can we move back toward that?AgreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAgreeAgree
20
3/7/2016 21:35:09Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventDisagreeAmbivalentAmbivalentDisagreeDisagreeAgreeAmbivalent
21
3/7/2016 21:35:59Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventFull Moon is a pretty gross event. But that doesn't mean we should get rid of it. Help get rid of the grossness (painted people).DisagreeAgreeAgreeAgreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagree
22
3/7/2016 21:36:02Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventi've heard issues with sexual assault but I don't think eradicating the event is addressing the real problembetter sober monitors and a pledge people need to say before going in (psychology ftw!)DisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalentAgree
23
3/7/2016 21:36:42Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventFMOTQ should go back to its roots and start with a classier premise and can devolve as the night goes on. Provide roses/flowers for those who'd like to give one to anyone they meet or see that night, and say it's in exchange for a kiss on the cheek or a hug. Then, people can go with that fun expectation for nothing more than a kiss on the cheek, and if they choose to, go for more. It's the reputation of FMOTQ as being a make-out fest that puts unnecessary pressure on students to engage in unsafe behavior.DisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalent
24
3/7/2016 21:36:51Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventI think the freedom to make these choices safely is essential to Stanford; I myself don't participate in FMOTQ, but the idea of removing it feels like an infringement on my rights as a Stanford student, particularly in a tradition that isn't hurting anyone (and if it is due to transports, it's out of a person's own stupidity)DisagreeAgreeAmbivalentDisagreeDisagreeAgreeAmbivalent
25
3/7/2016 21:37:00Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventI think there should be more emphasis on having a good time without kissing. There should definitely still be recognition of the kissing tradition, however, so people remain consensual and safe. Perhaps within the talk of kissing, it should be known that sober kissing is fun too! But for me, a person who likes FMOTQ but does not want to kiss strangers, more options for entertainment would be nice. In past years I've just stood around awkwardly and uncomfortably not knowing what to do.DisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAgree
26
3/7/2016 21:37:13Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventAmbivalentAmbivalentAgreeDisagreeDisagreeAgreeAgree
27
3/7/2016 21:37:20Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventI would like full moon on the quad to return to a slightly more traditional scene rather than such a strange party. I do not think that it should be destroyed by stanford admin as it is a long tradition that connects the entire student body. I will attend regardlessMake it start at 10, end at 1. Good music. Prepared countdown. Roses. etc.DisagreeAmbivalentDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalentDisagree
28
3/7/2016 21:37:46Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventThrowback to the roses? Probably once every four years so that every student will get to experience it.AmbivalentAmbivalentAgreeAmbivalentDisagreeDisagreeAgree
29
3/7/2016 21:37:49Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventI think all of the consent education is really great and some of the best available on campus. But I think that has made "the main event" shorter which I don't think necessarily has to coincide with consent. We can still have 30 mins of kissing for those who want to and keep having a huge push for consent. AmbivalentDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalent
30
3/7/2016 21:39:03Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventAmbivalentAmbivalentAmbivalentAmbivalentAmbivalentAmbivalentAmbivalent
31
3/7/2016 21:39:23Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventI don't think FMOTQ suits couples because it's meant for single people to kiss each other randomly. It makes me uncomfortable that it exists. Maybe have a separate party for people who are in relationships somehow?Everyone can be paired for a date with someone from their class, or if they're in a relationship Stanford can fund them $10 towards a date together. Possibly have it be a relaxing day on the quad stillAgreeAgreeAgreeAgreeDisagreeAmbivalentAgree
32
3/7/2016 21:39:41Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventAgreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalent
33
3/7/2016 21:40:24Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventAdditional activities featured in the event for individuals who are not interested in participating in the kissing exchanges. DINING HALL HOPPING! Low key themed dance parties will be hosted in specific dining halls -- and students will be welcomed to venture from one dining hall to the next. They could even do the bingo thing that is usually done at FMOTQ here! AmbivalentAmbivalentAmbivalentDisagreeDisagreeAgreeAgree
34
3/7/2016 21:41:17Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventI believe that FMOTQ could serve as a platform for consent and a space in which to demonstrate and practice what consent looks like. I do not think banning FMOTQ will solve our issues of sexual assault-- it is not a bandaid solution. However, I do think instituting programming targeted toward sexual violence prevention, similar to RA training events, during NSO would help introduce incoming students to the issue. More importantly, it would cause a gradual shift in culture and change the way we approach issues of sexual violence as an institution. I also think the University needs to provide more spaces to discuss these issues and put on various programming events throughout the year that would facilitate conversation among students, giving survivors of sexual assault, harassment and abuse an opportunity to share their story and that would give others a chance to engage with the issue.None.DisagreeAmbivalentAmbivalentDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAgree
35
3/7/2016 21:42:45Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventAgreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAgreeAgree
36
3/7/2016 21:44:31Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventDisagreeAgreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalentDisagree
37
3/7/2016 21:45:43Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventWell since it's clear Administration won't help us out, let's organize our own stuff with SCN/KZSU. They're probably better entertainers anyway. Everything else is fine honestly.DisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalent
38
3/7/2016 21:46:24Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventStage with a ceremony of seniors with roses kissing freshmen girls at midnight and then everyone else starts kissing. AgreeDisagreeAgreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalentAgree
39
3/7/2016 21:46:58Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventAn even greater focus on consent would be greatDisagreeAgreeAgreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalentAmbivalent
40
3/7/2016 21:47:37Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventI completely respect the rights of others to feel comfortable in a space, however, I think that (a) FMOTQ is a wonderful tradition we should keep and (b) if you aren't comfortable you should choose another activity for the night -- maybe there could be an alternate activity for those who did not/do not enjoy FMOTQ?

Also (c) it would be incredibly dangerous for the University to stop backing FMOTQ because people would do it anyways and that would be incredibly dangerous		DisagreeAgreeAmbivalentDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalentAmbivalent
41
3/7/2016 21:52:12Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventI like the idea of some sort of party, and the focus on consent and safe sex is great, but I think it could be refocused to more of a campus wide dance party (if the speakers are adequate) and less of an orgyAgreeAgreeAgreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalentAmbivalent
42
3/7/2016 21:52:52Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventHappy to see reforms. Don't want it to go awayDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAgreeAmbivalent
43
3/7/2016 21:53:01Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventsee below. no nudity, bring back the classy-ness of it.AmbivalentAgreeAgreeAmbivalentDisagreeAmbivalentAgree
44
3/7/2016 21:53:13Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventMake the atmosphere more romanticDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAgree
45
3/7/2016 21:54:09Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventmake sure it is obvious who is not willing to kissDisagreeAgreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAgree
46
3/7/2016 21:59:04Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventN/AAgree
47
3/7/2016 22:01:08Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventInstead of making it one big kiss-fest, also include alternative activities inside the quadAmbivalentAmbivalentDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalentAgree
48
3/7/2016 22:01:19Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventGo back to FMOTQ ca. 2013We should have a huge bonfire the week before the big game!AmbivalentDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalentDisagreeDisagreeDisagree
49
3/7/2016 22:05:09Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventI really like the history of FMOTQ, back when it started with the roses, so I would hate to see it eliminated. I think the way it's changed since then reflects the way the culture has changed around it, but it's still a tradition that's very unique to Stanford, and which was a part of my freshman experience I wouldn't give up.DisagreeAgreeAmbivalentDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalentAgree
50
3/7/2016 22:11:44Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventA defunded and unsanctioned FMOTQ is a public health nightmare waiting to happen. Legalize, regulate, and tax FMOTQ!DisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalentDisagreeAgreeAgree
51
3/7/2016 22:12:38Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventI just wish there was more stuff to do.AmbivalentDisagreeAmbivalentDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalentAgree
52
3/7/2016 22:16:48Class of 2017"Evolution, not revolution": I would like to see some changes made, but don't want to eliminate the eventAddress the specific concerns about the event, but don't eliminate it entirelyAgreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalentAgree
53
3/7/2016 21:53:15Class of 2017Can we go back to giving people flowers?Full Moon on the Quad is alienating for people who don't want to kiss anyone. The idea behind the tradition, to welcome new students to Stanford and welcome returning students back, is great. The food is awesome, the music is fun. But the premise that this event is based on making out with strangers means that a lot of people won't want to participate and will feel uncomfortable going, even if they don't plan to kiss anyone. There is an expectation that if you go, you kiss people. If you don't want to kiss anyone, it can be awkward to try to explain why. AmbivalentAgreeAmbivalentAmbivalentDisagreeAgreeAgree
54
3/7/2016 21:33:48Class of 2017FMOTQ doesn't need to be replaced. It can just end quietly.FMOTQ is one of the scummiest, slimiest events I've been to at Stanford. Having read everything you and other student representatives have sent, I have yet to be convinced that there is any reason it should continue to exist at all. Traditions that come to an end don't need to be replaced by new traditions. They can just end quietly.See aboveAmbivalentAmbivalentAgreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalent
55
3/7/2016 21:28:34Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalentAmbivalent
56
3/7/2016 21:28:57Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isAmbivalentAmbivalentAmbivalentAmbivalentDisagreeDisagreeAgree
57
3/7/2016 21:29:18Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isAmbivalentAmbivalentAmbivalentAmbivalentDisagreeAmbivalentAgree
58
3/7/2016 21:29:20Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isDisagreeAgreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalent
59
3/7/2016 21:29:29Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isDisagreeAmbivalentDisagreeAmbivalentDisagreeAmbivalentDisagree
60
3/7/2016 21:29:40Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isFMOTQ is a part of Stanford history!DisagreeAgreeAgreeAmbivalentDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalent
61
3/7/2016 21:29:50Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it is
62
3/7/2016 21:29:56Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalentAgree
63
3/7/2016 21:29:57Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalentAmbivalent
64
3/7/2016 21:29:59Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isDisagreeDisagreeAgreeAgreeDisagreeAgreeAgree
65
3/7/2016 21:30:06Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it is
66
3/7/2016 21:30:16Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isIt's safe, fun, and uniquely Stanford.DisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagree
67
3/7/2016 21:30:18Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isI like FMOTQ as it is, with its weirdness.Start earlier, go later.AmbivalentDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagree
68
3/7/2016 21:31:22Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAgree
69
3/7/2016 21:31:34Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalent
70
3/7/2016 21:31:35Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalentAmbivalent
71
3/7/2016 21:31:40Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isLove the tradition, fun, quirky, keep it the way it isKeep it the same!!!DisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalentDisagree
72
3/7/2016 21:32:05Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isDisagreeAgreeDisagreeAmbivalentDisagreeAmbivalentDisagree
73
3/7/2016 21:32:19Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagree
74
3/7/2016 21:32:33Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isIt is our oldest tradition and will happen anyway. Regulating it keeps it safe. Removing it will just endanger students. This is not some kind of Cardinal Nights bullshit where you can pull the wool over our eyes and pretend we like it. A tradition cannot be "new." Students who do not like it do not have to attend. DisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalent
75
3/7/2016 21:32:45Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it is
76
3/7/2016 21:32:46Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isAmbivalentAmbivalentAmbivalentAmbivalentDisagreeAgreeAgree
77
3/7/2016 21:32:53Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isI feel Full Moon is already safe because it is monitored by security and Sober Monitors. I see no reason to change it aside from funding issues. Those who feel unsafe at the event should exercise caution and diligence or stay with a group of trusted friends DisagreeAmbivalentAgreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAgree
78
3/7/2016 21:32:55Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isI think the university does a good job on reinforcing the importance of consent, providing mouthwash, and having PHE's and sober monitors to help ensure safetyDisagreeDisagreeAgreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalentDisagree
79
3/7/2016 21:32:57Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isDo not change the tradition just to pacify forces that take issue with everythingN/A--keep the old oneAmbivalentDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagree
80
3/7/2016 21:33:37Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isI don't participate in FMOTQ, but I don't see any value in cancelling it. AmbivalentAmbivalentAmbivalentAmbivalentAmbivalentAmbivalentAmbivalent
81
3/7/2016 21:33:40Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAgreeAgree
82
3/7/2016 21:33:57Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isI like that this year's FMOTQ emphasized consent so much. There were many messages going out to the student body even before the event, telling students that you must ask for consent before kissing anyone. I think this is one benefit of FMOTQ -- it encourages students to think about the importance of consent, not only in this situation, but in others as well. AmbivalentAmbivalentAmbivalentDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagree
83
3/7/2016 21:34:26Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isI think it's been a strong, fun, safe event in the past. This is one of the most protected events on campus and it shouldn't be encouraged to happen away from administrative support. Do things to keep it classy, more roses and stuff.DisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalent
84
3/7/2016 21:34:48Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isFMOTQ is the best! Love it. Even with a girlfriend it is a fun event. N/aDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalentDisagree
85
3/7/2016 21:35:09Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isIF YOU GET RID OF FULL MOON I WILL LITERALLY TRANSFER TO USC (and that is saying a lot because I hate USC)FMOTQ NAKEDDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagree
86
3/7/2016 21:36:11Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isits an tradition! One of the unique events that makes Stanford so specialDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagree
87
3/7/2016 21:36:14Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isAmbivalentAgreeAmbivalentDisagreeDisagreeAgreeAmbivalent
88
3/7/2016 21:36:30Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isHaving a no-kissing zone might be a good idea- I think it would be a first step towards addressing concerns regarding non-consensual behavior. However, I find other potential restrictions (no music, nudity, etc..) to be a bit patronizing. AmbivalentDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAgreeAgree
89
3/7/2016 21:36:34Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it is
90
3/7/2016 21:36:59Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isI don't really go to FMOTQ but I like that it exists. I think it is uniquely Stanford and a lot of my friends really love it as a tradition.AmbivalentDisagreeAmbivalentDisagreeDisagreeAgreeAmbivalent
91
3/7/2016 21:37:14Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isFMOTQ is a tradition that builds community on campus. It should not be canceled, and in fact canceling it would or could make alternatives more appealing and thus more dangerousAmbivalentDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAgreeAmbivalent
92
3/7/2016 21:37:32Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isDisagreeAmbivalentDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagree
93
3/7/2016 21:37:32Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isI think Full Moon does a good job of addressing important issues such as actual, affirmative consent, etc. There can always be improvement, but as a whole, I think there is a lot of emphasis on safety surrounding this event.Nope.AmbivalentDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalent
94
3/7/2016 21:37:36Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isFMOTQ is a super fun tradition, and students have worked hard to make it an inclusive, safe experience for everyone. Students should have the choice to attend; if someone is uncomfortable attending, then that person doesn't have to participate.AmbivalentDisagreeAmbivalentDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalent
95
3/7/2016 21:38:01Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalent
96
3/7/2016 21:38:21Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isTradition! Wackiness! Liberation! FMOTQ stands for what Stanford stands for, where the winds of freedom blow.AmbivalentDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalentAmbivalent
97
3/7/2016 21:38:37Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isAmbivalentAgreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalent
98
3/7/2016 21:38:57Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isI think FMOTQ does a good job of emphasizing that consent is important; you can go, but don't have to kiss if you don't want to. (Obviously people abuse the event and act inappropriately -- but the same could be said of literally any social event on any college campus at any time.) Also, there is food beforehand, and watching LSJUMB is fun, so it's a good social event even if you want to leave before kissing starts at midnight. I think as long as there are still people there handing out mouthwash and telling people not to participate if they're sick and emphasizing that bodily autonomy, as always, is incredibly important, the event should stay and be weird and fun.DisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAmbivalentAmbivalent
99
3/7/2016 21:39:30Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagree
100
3/7/2016 21:39:38Class of 2017I like FMOTQ as it isThought it was very well run this year, love the presence of shprc, PHEs, etc.I think FMOTQ is irreplaceable in the stanford experienceDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeDisagreeAgree