| A | B | C | D | E | F | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2023 Peace and Order Council Performance Audit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | Indicator References for Provinces, Cities, and Municipalities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | Indicators | Parameters | Means of Verification | Points System | Remarks and Considerations / Conditions | Per Auditors' Orientation: HOW TO SCORE | PRE-ASSESSMENT | AUDIT PROPER | ADJUSTED PER GENERATED SCORE | |||||||||||||||||
5 | Status | Points | Remarks | Recommendations | Points Given | Remarks | Points Given | Remarks | ||||||||||||||||||
6 | Pillar 1 - Functionality Indicators (60%) (125 total points) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | 1. Organization (15 points) | a. Organization/ Creation of the POC for the term 2023-2025, as prescribed under Executive Order No. 773, s. of 2009, including the following: β’ Chairperson β Governor / Mayor β’ Vice Chairperson β Vice-Governor / Vice-Mayor β’ Sangguniang Panlalawigan / Panlungsod/ Pambayan (Committee Chair on Peace and Order and Public Safety β’ Three (3) Representatives from Civil Society Organizations (CSOs), with appropriate SecurityClearances β’ Representatives from the DILG, NICA, DND, DOJ, DA, DAR, DPWH, DTI, DSWD, DOH, DOTr, DEPED, DENR, PCOO, DDB, NCIP, OPAPRU, | i. EO, Local Ordinance, POC Resolution, or other similar local issuance creating or organizing the POC | 5 - complete 0- incomplete | (A) Points shall only be granted if the MOV provided covers all mandatory members as prescribed by EO 773. Incomplete MOVs SHALL NOT merit points. (B) Local counterparts of National Government Agencies shall only be included as members of the council as applicable. (C) Pursuant to DILG Memorandum Circular No. 2022 123, CSOs shall be appointed by the Chairperson and must have secured the appropriate Security Clearances from the concerned PNP Office. In cases wherein POCs have yet to secure Security Clearances for their member CSOs, an appropriate justification may instead be provided together with the Endorsement/Recommendation/Request from the POC Secretariat, signifying the POCβs initiation of the Security Clearance process. | 1. Evaluate the document on whether or not members are complete. It should include all mandatory members, all NGA counterparts that are applicable to the LGU, and all CSO Representatives 2. Members are ideally named, but positions may be considered, especially for representatives of NGAs that regularly rotate the personnel designated as the representative. 3. Civil Society Organizations must be covered by a Security Clearance. 4. Should there be no Security Clearance for any CSO, a Justification should be provided, together with the letter of endorsement from the POC Secretariat to signify that the POC has initiated the process of applying for the Security Clearance. | Full compliance | Executive Order (EO) / Local Ordinance on the reorganization of the POC | 5 | EO No. 36 s 2022 | 5 | EO No. 36 s 2022 | 5 | EO No. 36 s 2022 | ||||||||||||
8 | Conformed to prescribed members per EO 773 S2009 but, CSO/s has yet to secure security clearance | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | TRUE | Chairman: Mayor | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | TRUE | Co-Chairman: Vice-Mayor | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
11 | TRUE | SB Chair on Peace & Order and Public Safety | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | TRUE | 3 CSO Representatives | ASORB, KAAKIBAT CIVICOM INTERNATIONAL INC., PGBI | |||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | TRUE | PNP | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | TRUE | AFP | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | TRUE | MENRO, MAO, MSWDO, MEO, MHO, MARO, Trial Court, DILG, DepEd | Present: MARPO, City ENRO, DILG, DEPED, CEO, CSWDO, CHO, PSO, DOJ | |||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | TRUE | Expanded Members (if theres any, pls specify ) | PRESENT: PDEA, BFP, LTO, CDRRO, BJMP, LnB, SK pRES | |||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | b. Formulation of the Special Action Committee (SACs) as prescribed by the DILG MC No. 2019-143, for the term 2023 - 2025 | i. . Executive Order (EO), Local Ordinance, POC Resolution, or other similar local issuance creating the Special Action Committees | 5 β At least two SACs created 3 β 1 SAC created 0 β no SAC created | (A) A Special Action Committee is any committee, task force, or institution created under or through the POC to address and prevent specific peace and order and public safety issues as prescribed under the DILG MC 2019-143 and other similar issuances. | 1. Evaluate the document on whether or not two Special Action Committees have been created. 2. The issuance must cover the Members of the SAC who should be members of the POC as prescribed/required by the Omnibus Guidelines. Additional members may also be included provided core members have been identified. Duties and functions of the SAC must also be identified. | Full compliance | 5 | EO No. 39 s 2022 dtd 30 Sept 2022 Resolution No. 5 s 2022 dtd 30 Sept 2022 | 5 | EO No. 39 s 2022 dtd 30 Sept 2022 Resolution No. 5 s 2022 dtd 30 Sept 2022 | 5 | EO No. 39 s 2022 dtd 30 Sept 2022 Resolution No. 5 s 2022 dtd 30 Sept 2022 | ||||||||||||||
18 | TRUE | SAC on Anti-Criminality | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | TRUE | SAC on Anti-Insurgency and Preventing Violent Extremism | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
20 | TRUE | SAC on Public Safety | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
21 | TRUE | Crisis Management Committee | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
22 | FALSE | POPS TWG | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
23 | FALSE | Other Sub-Committees | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
24 | c. Organization of the POC Secretariat composed of the following members as prescribed by the DILG MC 2019-143: β’ Secretariat Head β DILG Provincial / City / Municipal Director β’ DILG Staff as focal persons β’ Regular Support Staff from the Office of the POC Chairperson β’ Research Analyst β’ InformationTechnology Staff β’ AdministrativeStaff β’ Any additionalpersonnel, subject to available funds and usual accounting and auditing rules and regulations | i. Executive Order (EO), Local Ordinance, POC Resolution, or other similar local issuance organizing the POC Secretariat | 5 β Present 0 β Absent | (A) A member of the POC Secretariat may perform more than one of the functions designated (i.e. Research Analyst and Admin Staff). Such scenarios must be specified in the issuance. (B) Names of Officials and Staff and their respective functions must be clearly indicated in the issuances. | 1. Evaluate the document on the completeness of the issuance with members prescribed. 2. The issuance must cover the names, as well as the duties and functions of each member of the secretariat. 3. A member of the POC Secretariat may perform more than one function | Full compliance | 5 | EO No. 36 s 2022 dtd 30 Sept 2022 EO No. 23 s 2024 dtd 21 March 2024 | 5 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||
25 | TRUE | C/MLGOO or DILG as Secreatriat Head | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
26 | TRUE | DILG Staff | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
27 | TRUE | Regular Support Staff from the Office of the POC Chairperson | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
28 | TRUE | Research Analyst | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
29 | TRUE | Information Technology Staff | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
30 | TRUE | AdministrativeStaff | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
31 | FALSE | Any additionalpersonnel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
32 | 2. Meetings (25 points) | a. Conduct of Four (4) or more Quarterly POC Meetings | i. Minutes of the Meeting (MOM) for 4 or more meetings, duly signed by the POC Secretariat and the POC Chairperson. Each MOM shall be accompanied by the following as attachments: a. Attendance Sheet b. Notice of Meeting/Invitation c. Proof of Receipt of Notice/Invitation | 20 β 4 or more meetings 15 β 3 meetings 10 β 2 meetings 5 β 1 meeting only 0 β no meetings conducted *each missing/invalid attachment shall warrant a demerit of 1 point to this indicatorβs score. *If a meeting is deemed invalid by the audit team, it shall not count towards the total points, regardless of the presence of attachments | (A) If two or more meetings are conducted in a quarter, it shall still only be considered as one (1) meeting. (B) Joint and Clustered meetings with LDCs, LDRRMCs, LADACs, LTF-ELCAC, and other local councils and special bodies may still be counted as one (1) meeting for the quarter, provided that the meeting highlighted matters concerning peace and order and public safety, and resolutions/actions were adopted to address said matters. (C) The Minutes of the Meeting shall be prepared by the POC Secretariat and approved, noted, or attested by the Presiding Officer. It must also signify that the Chairperson and/or Vice Chairperson attended and presided over the meeting to count as one (1) meeting for the quarter. (D) In the event that both the Chairperson and Vice Chairperson is unable to attend and preside over the meeting, the Meeting shall still be deemed valid as long as: (1) Quorum is met (50% of the total members + 1 is in attendance) and (2) a Temporary Presiding Officer from among the members of the council is duly designated either through the POCβs Internal Rules and Procedures or through a motion of the Council. Appropriate documents for the absence of the Chairperson and Vice Chairperson must be attached to earn full points for the meeting (e.g. Authorized Leave, Authorized Travel Authority, Authorization for Emergencies, etc.) (E) For meetings conducted online, attendance sheets generated through Google Forms or similar modes may be submitted in lieu of printed attendance sheets. (F) Proof of receipt of the Notice/Invitation may be in the form of a Formal Acknowledgement with appropriate stamp of date received, Screenshot of the text message or email, or similar lines of communication; and should the Secretariat employ online registration for the meeting, the screenshot of responses to such, with timestamps, is also valid. (G) If the scheduled meeting was postponed due to natural calamities, human-induced hazards, or any other similar emergencies, and was rescheduled to a date outside its intended quarter, it may still count as one (1) meeting provided that the POC Chairperson provides a formal justification of the cancellation, alongside a third-party report on the incident. (G) For meetings that were attended by higher authorities (i.e. Chairpersons/Vice Chairpersons of higher POCs, Cabinet Secretary Members, and other similar officials), particularly Joint/Cluster meetings presided by said higher authorities, the MOM shall signify the circumstances of such and shall still denote the POC Chairperson/Vice Chairpersonβs attendance and lead in the discussions concerning the POCβs mandate. (H) A quarterly meeting shall be considered invalid if it is either of the following: β’ Dated outside its intended quarter β’ Not presided by the POC Chairperson, Vice Chairperson, or a duly designated Presiding Officer β’ Quorum is not met (to meet Quorum, 50% of members +1 must be in attendance, inclusive of the Presiding Officer) β’ Any other inconsistencies or discrepancies, noted by the audit team, among the documents therein. | 1. Evaluate the Minutes of the Meeting for the conduct of at least one regular meeting per quarter. Further evaluate the consistency between the minutes and the attachments, such as, but not limited to, dates, quorum, attendance of members and presiding officers, etc. 2. Refer to the indicator references for further considerations and special circumstances on various meetings put forward by the POCs | 4 or more meetings | 20 | 20 | PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION ON CONDUCTED MEETINGS OUTSIDE SCHEDULE PER RESO | 20 | PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION ON CONDUCTED MEETINGS OUTSIDE SCHEDULE PER RESO | ||||||||||||||
33 | Quarterly Meetings | Complied as of 4.25.24 | Complied as of 4.25.24 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
34 | 1st Qtr Mtg | 23-Mar-2023 | March 23, 2023 with quorum | |||||||||||||||||||||||
35 | 2nd Qtr Mtg | 30-Jun-2023 | June 20, 2023-with quorum | 4th week of the last month of the quarter | 4th week of the last month of the quarter | |||||||||||||||||||||
36 | 3rd Qtr Mtg | 29-Sep-2023 | 29/09/2023-with quorum | |||||||||||||||||||||||
37 | 4th Qtr Mtg | 4-Dec-2023 | 04/12/2023- with quorum | 1st week of the last month of the quarter | 1st week of the last month of the quarter | |||||||||||||||||||||
38 | Notice of Meetings | 4 Notice of Meetings w/ agenda duly acknowledged/received by members | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
39 | Minutes of Meetings | 4 Minutes of the Meeting for 4/more quarterly/regular meeting duly signed by the POC Secretariat Head and attested by the POC Chairperson | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
40 | Attendance Sheets | 4/more attendance sheets with quorum | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
41 | Total Mtgs w/ quorum | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
42 | No. of Regular Members | 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
43 | Det. of Quorum | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
44 | QUORUM | 11 | Mrach 23, 2023 with quorum | |||||||||||||||||||||||
45 | QUORUM | 14 | June 20, 2023-with quorum | |||||||||||||||||||||||
46 | QUORUM | 14 | 29/09/2023-with quorum | |||||||||||||||||||||||
47 | QUORUM | 12 | 04/12/2023- with quorum | |||||||||||||||||||||||
48 | b. Schedule of POC Meetings | i. Resolution or Minutes of the Meeting signifying the schedule of meetings for 2023 | 5 β Present 0 β Absent | (A) The document must be signed by the POC Chairperson (B) The schedule may be specific dates or general statements (i.e. βEvery 1st Week of the 2nd Month of every Quarter) | 1. Evaluate the document presented on whether or not the issuance properly covers the scheduleof POC Meetings for 2023. Issuances used and carried over from the previous term is alsoaccepted. | Present | Resolution on the Schedule of Quarterly/Regular Meetings | 5 | 5 | 3rd week of the last month of the quarter | 5 | 3rd week of the last month of the quarter | ||||||||||||||
49 | 3. Policies, Plans, and Budget (75 points) | a. Formulation of policies to address Peace and Order and Public Safety matters | i. At least one (1) Resolution per quarter aimed to address, maintain, and/or improve current Peace and Order and Public Safety situation of the POC (excluding resolutions for organization/reorganization) | 5 β 4 Quarters with at least one resolution passed 4 β 3 Quarters with at least one resolution passed 3 β 2 Quarters with at least one resolution passed 2 β 1 Quarter with at least one resolution passed 0 β No resolution passed | (A) A minimum of one (1) resolution per quarter is required. (B) Additional resolutions adopted/passed during a quarter cannot offset the lack of resolutions adopted/passed during another quarter. (C) For POCs that did not issue any resolutions in a given quarter, they may provide a justification on the specifics why a resolution was not issued or needed. | 1. Evaluate the documents presented and check if the POC was able to adopt at least oneresolution per quarter, as part of the outputs of their regular POC meetings and should coverPOPS situation (commendations, congratulations, and similar issuances are not accepted). 2. Should the POC provide a justification on why they were not able to adopt a resolution for the quarter, the Audit Committee shall evaluate its merits based on the discussions made during the meeting. | Full compliance | 4 Quarters with at least one resolution passed | 5 | 5 | some resolutions have the same reso no. | 5 | some resolutions have the same reso no. | |||||||||||||
50 | 1st Qtr Mtg | With Resolution aimed to address, maintain, and/or improve current POPS situation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
51 | 2nd Qtr Mtg | With Resolution aimed to address, maintain, and/or improve current POPS situation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
52 | 3rd Qtr Mtg | With Resolution aimed to address, maintain, and/or improve current POPS situation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
53 | 4th Qtr Mtg | With Resolution aimed to address, maintain, and/or improve current POPS situation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
54 | b. Compliance to the 2023-2025 Peace and Order and Public Safety (POPS) Planning Process, using the POPS Planning Guidebook | i. POPS Plan Chapters A - J generated from the POPS Plan for 2023-2025 | 5 β All Chapters present with no discrepancies 4 β 1 Chapter with discrepancies 3 β 2 Chapters with discrepancies 2 β 3 Chapters with discrepancies 1 β 4 or more chapters with discrepancies 0 β No POPS Plan | (A) A chapter is considered present with no discrepancies if it has been encoded accordingly to the POPSP-PCMS, following the prescribed template, and all data fields properly accomplished. (B) POCs may attach documentation of their planning process as further supporting documents. (C) Sample discrepancies are as follows: β’ Missing data fields β’ Missing Chapters β’ Incorrect certifications or supporting documents (D) The POPS Plan must adhere to the following steps as prescribed by the DILG MC No. 2022-118 and the POPS Plan Guidebook: β’ Chapter A β Review of Local Strategic Direction β’ Chapter B β Peace and Order and Public Safety Situation β’ Chapter C β Priority POPS Challenges β’ Chapter D β Objectives, Strategies, Targets, Indicators, and Baseline β’ Chapter E β Critical Policies, Programs, Projects, Services, Activities β’ Chapter F - Funding Requirements β’ Chapter G β Actual Allocation β’ Chapter H β Reporting Form 1 β’ Chapter I β Reporting Form 2 β’ Chapter J β POC Secretariat Report | 1. Evaluate each chapter of the POCβs POPS Plan and check for discrepancies in each chapter. Eachchapter must be fully complete, with no discrepancies in encoded data. 2. Refer to the POPS Planning Guidelines under the DILG Memorandum Circular No. 2022-118, the POPS Planning Guidebook, and any other reference documents provided by the POC. | Full compliance | 5 | 5 | Upload more readable MOVs (Chapter A-J) | 5 | Upload more readable MOVs (Chapter A-J) | |||||||||||||||
55 | TRUE | Chapter A β Review of Local Strategic Direction | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
56 | TRUE | Chapter B β Peace and Order and Public Safety Situation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
57 | TRUE | Chapter C β Priority POPS Challenges | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
58 | TRUE | Chapter D β Objectives, Strategies, Targets, Indicators, and Baseline | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
59 | TRUE | Chapter E β Critical Policies, Programs, Projects, Services, Activities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
60 | TRUE | Chapter F - Funding Requirements | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
61 | TRUE | Chapter G β Actual Allocation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
62 | TRUE | Chapter H β Reporting Form 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
63 | TRUE | Chapter I β Reporting Form 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
64 | TRUE | Chapter J β POC Secretariat Report | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
65 | c. Adoption and funding of the POPS Plan | i. POC Resolution Adopting the POPS Plan ii. Appropriations Ordinance for the POPS Plan 2024 | 5 β Both documents present 3 β only one (1) of the documents is present 0 β no document present | (A) For the appropriations ordinance, upload only the first page containing the Ordinance number and total amount appropriated for the POPS Plan 2024 and the last page containing the signatures of key officials and the date. (B) If the POPS Plan was revised, upload the resolution revising the POPS Plan instead. | 1. Evaluate the documents presented. One of the documents must be the resolution adopting thePOPS Plan 2023-2025, and another must be the appropriations ordinance containing the appropriations for 2024, ensure that the POC has undergone the proper process in funding the POPS Plan. | Both documents present | 5 | 5 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||
66 | POC Resolution approving the POPS Plan for 2023-2025 | Joint CPOC-CADAC Resolution No. 01 S. 2022 | TRUE | |||||||||||||||||||||||
67 | Annual Appropriations Ordinance for FY 2024 | Appropriation Ordinance No. 16-0040-2023 | TRUE | |||||||||||||||||||||||
68 | Total amount appropriated for the POPS Plan 2024 | FALSE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
69 | d. Compliance to submission of Reports for the POPS Plan | i. Downloaded copy of the POPSP-PCMS Reporting Form 1 β1st Semester 2023 ii. Downloaded copy of the POPSP-PCMS Reporting Form 1 β2nd Semester 2023 iii. Downloaded copy of the POPSP-PPCMS Reporting Form 2 β Annual Reporting Form for 2023 | 5 β Three (3) Forms submitted on time 3 β Two (2) Forms submitted on time 1 β One (1) Form submitted on time 0 β No form submitted on time | (A) To be considered on time, the POPSP-PCS Reporting Form 1 β 1st Semester 2023 must be submitted to the DILG Central Office on or before August 31, 2023 (B) To be considered on time, the POPSP-PCS Reporting Form 1 β 2nd Semester 2023 must be submitted to the DILG Central Office on or before March 31, 2024 (C) To be considered on time, the POPSP-PCS Reporting Form 2 for 2023 must be submitted to the DILG Central Office on or before March 31, 2024 | 1. Refer to the timelines provided in the Indicator References and evaluate the documents presented. Each form should be submitted on or before the set deadline to count towards the score. 2. The status indicated in the forms must be denoted as βSubmitted to COβ. Following changes in the POPSP-PCMS, form status denoted as βReceived by RO/COβ is also accepted. | 3 Forms Submitted ON TIME | 5 | 5 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||
70 | POPS PCMS RF1 1st Sem | August 28, 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
71 | POPS PCMS RF1 2ND Sem | 30/3/2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
72 | POPS PCMS RF2 | March 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
73 | e. Accomplishment of financial targets | i. Copy of the Step H βAccomplishment Report Generated from the POPSP-PCMS | 15 β 80% and above 11 β 50% - 79.99% 7 β 30% - 49.99% 3 β 10% - 29.99% 0 β 0% - 9.99% | (A) Utilization must be computed using the actual utilization encoded in the Step H - Reporting Form 1 versus the encoded actual allocation πππ‘ππ π΄ππ‘π’ππ ππ‘ππππ§ππ‘πππ πππ 2023 πππ‘ππ π΄ππ‘π’ππ π΄ππππππ‘πππ πππ 2023 Γ 100 | 1. Examine the report submitted and evaluate the total actual utilization encoded for the year 2023 versus the total actual allocation that has been encoded. Percentages must be rounded off to two decimal places. | Percentage Utilization | 98.00% | 15 | 15 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||
74 | Total Amount utilized | 26,353,030.60 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
75 | Amount allocated | 26,890,445.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
76 | f. Accomplishment of physical targets | i. Copy of the Step H βAccomplishment Report Generated from the POPSP-PCMS ii. Post Activity Report (PAR) or other similar instruments of documentation (photos, vouchers, etc.) for each PPA | 15 β 80% and above 11 β 50% - 79.99% 7 β 30% - 49.99% 3 β 10% - 29.99% 0 β 0% - 9.99% | (A) Physical accomplishment must be computed using the total number of PPAs marked as P or F versus the total number of PPAs marked as P, F, or NI πππ‘ππ πππ΄π ππππππ ππ π ππ πΉ πππ‘ππ πππ΄π ππππππ ππ π, πΉ,& ππΌ Γ 100 (B) Each PPA without a PAR or equivalent shall be considered NI (C) For POCs that have more than 10 PPAs, or MOVs that exceed the maximum file size of the POC Audit Portal, it is recommended to provide an online Drive Folder to their respective Audit Committee, copy furnished the DILG BLGS | 1. Examine the report submitted and evaluate the total number of PPAs that have been marked as Partially or Fully implemented versus the total number of PPAs that have been marked as Partially, Fully, or Not Implemented. 2. PPAs that are βC β Cancelledβ or βNA β Not for Implementation within the Periodβ are notcounted towards the denominator. 3. Each PPA must be accompanied by appropriate documentation, otherwise it shall be considered not implemented. | Percentage of Accomplsihment | 100.00% | 15 | 15 | 98.25% | 15 | 98.25% | ||||||||||||||
77 | Total Number of Physical Target | 57.00 | Crime % Disorder 18 targets | Crime % Disorder 18 targets | ||||||||||||||||||||||
78 | No. of Partially accomplished physical target | 0.00 | 57 | ADAC 16 Targets 15 accomplished; Public Safety 6 target | ADAC 16 Targets 15 accomplished; Public Safety 6 target | |||||||||||||||||||||
79 | No. of Fully accomplished physical target | 56.00 | 56 | conflict 8 targets; emergency/fire safety 9 target | conflict 8 targets; emergency/fire safety 9 target | |||||||||||||||||||||
80 | g. Accomplishment of Objectives | i. Copy of the Step I βAccomplishment of Objectives Report generated from the POPSP-PCMS ii. Certifications per objective signed by the appropriate Champion identified in Chapter D | 15 β 80% and above 11 β 50% - 79.99% 7 β 30% - 49.99% 3 β 10% - 29.99% 0 β 0% - 9.99% | (A) The computation of accomplishment shall be done using the following formula: (π‘ππ‘ππ ππ’ππππ ππ ππππππ‘ππ£ππ πππ‘/πππππππππ βππ) (π‘ππ‘ππ ππ’ππππ ππ ππππππ‘ππ£ππ π€ππ‘β π ππ‘ π‘πππππ‘π ) Γ 100 (B) An objective shall be considered βmet/accomplishedβ when the actual accomplishments encoded for 2023 of each indicator is equal or greater than the target set (C) Objectives without the appropriate certification shall be considered unmet. | 1. Examine the report submitted and evaluate the total number of objectives that have been met versus the total number of objectives. 2. To be considered met, the actual accomplishment for the year must equal or exceed the target set, and should be accompanied by an appropriate certification. | Percentage of Met Objectives | 40.00% | 7 | 7 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||
81 | Total no. of Objectives w/ set target | 5.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
82 | Total No. of Objectives Met | 2.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
83 | h. Compliance to the submission of the POC Secretariat Reports | i. 2023 POC Secretariat Reports downloaded from the POPSPοΏ½PCMS | 5 β Two (2) reports submitted on time 3 β One (1) reportsubmitted on time 0 β No report submitted on time | (A) To be considered on time, the 1st Semester 2023 POC Secretariat Report must be submitted to the DILG Central Office on or before August 31, 2023 (B) To be considered on time, the 2nd Semester 2023 POC Secretariat Report must be submitted to the DILG Central Office on or before March 31, 2024 | 1. Evaluate the documents presented and check the report submission deadlines. 2. Follow the same timelines and considerations as the Reporting Form 1 | POPS PCMS Secretariat Report 1st Sem | 2/8/2023 | 5 | 5 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||
84 | POPS PCMS Secretariat Report 2ND Sem | 13/2/2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
85 | i. Compliance to Confidential Fund Reporting | i. Annex C β Quarterly Accomplishment Report on the Utilization of Confidential Funds with stamped or formal receipt from the DILG *POCs without allocation of CF may also submit an Annex C indicating no allocation of CF | 5 β Four (4) Confidential Fund Quarterly Utilization Reports submitted on time 4 β Three (3) Confidential Fund Quarterly Utilization Reports submitted on time 3 β Two (2) Confidential Fund Quarterly Utilization Reports submitted on time 2 β One (1) Confidential Fund Quarterly Utilization Report Submitted on time 0 β No Confidential Fund QuarterlyUtilization Report Submitted on time | (A) Pursuant to Section 5.2.1. of the COA-DBM Joint Circular No. 2015-01, all LGUs which released CF shall submit the Quarterly Accomplishment Report on the Use of CF, duly certified by the Head of Agency, not later than the 15th day of the first month of the succeeding quarter (B) If the concerned POC did not allocate any Confidential Funds for the year, a Certification of NonοΏ½Allocation may be issued to get a score of 5, signed by the Budget Officer and Accountant, and attested by the POC Chairperson (C) If the total CF allocated by the LGU exceeds 30% of the total amount allocated for Peace and Order Programs, a copy of the authorization from the Secretary of the Interior and Local Government must also be attached | 1. Evaluate the documents presented on whether they have been submitted and received by the DILG (any level) on or before the set deadline, 15th of the first month of the succeeding quarter, and must be certified by the Head of Agency (Mayor/Governor as the POC Chair and HOA) 2. Non-allocation / Non-utilization of CF is considered a complete score, provided that the POC has provided justification/certifications. | Full compliance | 5 | 5 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||
86 | CF Allocation | 7076400 | report with stamped received of City DILG Level | report with stamped received of City DILG Level | ||||||||||||||||||||||
87 | CF Utilization | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
88 | % Utilization | #DIV/0! | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
89 | 4. General Supervision (5 Points) | a. Compliance of Lower POCs to the POC Performance Audit | i. POC Performance Audit Results via the POC Audit Portal Consolidated Reporting Form or BPOC Functionality Results via the National Barangay Operations Office | For Provinces: 5 β 90% of component POCs and above rated at least Moderate Performing 4 β 60% - 89.99% of component POCs rated at least Moderate Performing 3 β 40% - 59.99% of component POCs rated at least Moderate Performing 2 β 20% - 39.99% of component POCs rated at least Moderate Performing 1 β 1% - 19.99% of component POCs rated at least Moderate Performing 0 β No component POCs are rated at least Moderate Performing For Cities/Municipalities: 5 β 90% of BPOCs are rated as Functional 4 β 60% - 89.99% of BPOCs are rated as Functional 3 β 40% - 59.99% of BPOCs are rated as Functional 2 β 20% - 39.99% of BPOCs are rated as Functional 1 β 1% - 19.99% of BPOCs are rated as Functional 0 β No BPOCs are rated as Functional | (A) For City and Municipal POCs, the results of the BPOC Functionality Assessment through the SGLGB shall be communicated through a separate issuance. (B) For Provinces, kindly upload the respective Consolidated Report Forms, APPROVED and SIGNEDby the respective Audit Committees | 1. For Provinces: evaluate the presented Consolidated Reporting Form covering the results, which must be signed and approved by the respective audit committees 2. For City/Municipality: Evaluate the documents presented covering the results of the 2023 BPOC assessment | NBOO TO SUPPLY DATA | 4.67 | ||||||||||||||||||
90 | 5. Innovation/s (5 Points) | a. Unique Innovation/s implemented by POCs to address specific Peace and Order and Public Safety Issues within their locality | i. Pertinent documents related to the innovation that signify its formulation, implementation, and accomplishments. The following documents may be presented: β’ Activity Design β’ Post Activity Reports β’ Accomplishment Reports and Documentations β’ Concept Notes and Proposals β’ Other reports covering results and accomplishments of the initiative | 5 β Complete 0 β Absent | (A) Innovations are new approaches, strategies, frameworks, implemented and initiated by Peace and Order Councils, which address specific local peace and order and public safety issues.Innovations must: β’ be implemented during 2023 β’ address a specific POPS issue or challenge β’ be sustainable for continuous implementation and development β’ have accomplishments and results directly contributing to the improvement of POPS issues and challenges Examples: β’ Development of information databases, IT systems, and other similar digital platforms β’ Adoption of new and emerging technologies in emergency response β’ Development of interconnected CCTV Systems for general surveillance, ease of criminal investigation, and emergency response β’ Introduction of platforms for citizen participation in the maintenance of community peace and order Introduction of cost-cutting measures, process streamlining, and other similar new frameworks that directly contribute to workload efficiency in the POC | 1. Evaluate the documents presented by the POC and examine the concept of the innovation, its implementation, and the accomplishments/results/impacts that it has achieved on the POPS situation of the POC. 2. The BLGS has provided some examples and criteria for evaluating innovations in the indicator references, but evaluation ultimately rests with the Audit Committees. These innovations must be unique and crafted with the intention of resolving specific POPS issues in the locality. 3. Generally, these are measures and strategies that are outside the usual activities conducted by POCs. Innovations may be carried over from previous iterations of the audit, so long as it has been implemented in 2023. | Full compliance | 5 | 5 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||
91 | TRUE | Innovation is carried over from previous iterations of the audit and was implemented in 2023. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
92 | Name of Innovation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
93 | Supporting docs submitted | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
94 | TOTAL POINTS - Pillar 1 - Functionality Indicators (60%) (125 total points) | 0.5376 | 53.7600 | 56.0016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
95 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
96 | Pillar 2 - Development Indicators (40%) (60 Points Total) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
97 | 1. Addressing Criminality (30 Points) | a. Percentage change in Total Peace and Order Indicator (POI) | i. PNP Statistical Report on Total POI 2022 ii. PNP Statistical Report on Total POI 2023 | 15 β 5% or greater decrease in the Total POI 12.5 β 2.5% - 4.99% decrease in the Total POI 10 β 0.01% to 2.49% decrease in the Total POI 7 β No Change in the Total POI 0 β 1% or greater increase in the Total POI | (A) The change in Total POI be computed using the following formula: 2023 πππΌ β 2022 πππΌ 2022 πππΌ π₯ 100% A positive (+) result indicates an increase while a negative (-) indicates a decrease. (B) Should a POC achieve a record of 0 POI, they shall automatically receive a score of 15 | 1. Evaluate the reports presented and calculate the percentage change from 2022 to 2023. Increase from 0.01% to 0.99% is rounded down to No change. 2. Maintaining a record of 0 POI (no room for improvement) shall be given full points. | Percentage Change of POI from 2022-2023 | 40.73% | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
98 | POI 2022 | 496 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
99 | POI 2023 | 698 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
100 | b. Percentage change in Crime Solution Efficiency Rate | i. PNP Statistical Report on Crime Solution Efficiency Rate 2022 ii. PNP Statistical Report on Crime Solution Efficiency Rate 2023 | 15 β 5% or greater increase in Crime Solution Efficiency 12.5 β 2.5% - 4.99% increase in Crime Solution Efficiency 10 β 0.01% to 2.49% increase in Crime Solution Efficiency 7 β No Change in Crime Solution Efficiency 0 β 1% or greater decrease in Crime Solution Efficiency | (A) The change in Crime Solution Efficiency shall be computed using the following formula: 2023 πΆππΈ β 2022 πΆππΈ 2022 πΆππΈ π₯ 100% A positive (+) result indicates an increase while a negative (-) indicates a decrease. (B) Should a POC achieve a record of 100% CSE, they shall automatically receive a score of 15 | 1. Evaluate the reports presented and calculate the percentage change from 2022 to 2023. Decrease from 0.01% to 0.99% is rounded down to No change. 2. Achieving a record of 100% CSE (no room for improvement) shall be given full points. | Percentage change in Crime Solution Efficiency Rate | 32.93% | 0 | 32.93% | 15 | 180.18% increase in the POI based on the issued PNP Certification | 15 | 180.18% increase in the POI based on the issued PNP Certification | |||||||||||||