|Scoring Tool - All Organizations|
|Click on "File" then "Make a copy...". A new text box will open, at which time you: 1) name the file as you like and 2) save it to your folder of choice.||ORGANIZATIONS|
|For questions rated on a 0-5 scale, 0 means not at all, 1-2 means somewhat, 3-4 means mostly and 5 means absolutely.|
For questions rated on a 0-10 scale, 0 means not at all, 1-4 means somewhat, 5-8 means mostly and 9-10 means absolutely.
For questions on a 0-3 scale, 0 means not at all, 1-2 means somewhat and 3 means absolutely.
For questions on a 0-2 scale, 0 means not at all, 1 means somewhat, and 2 means absolutely.
|Section 2, A: Community Challenges
*Note these are community challenges, not the challenges of the organization.
|The organization clearly defines and understands the community challenge(s).||5|
|Clearly states how many individuals, households or organizations are impacted within Buncombe County.||5|
|Section 2, B: Strategy |
*Strategy can be a methodology or program the organization provides to carry out their mission.
|*If the applicant included more than one strategy, choose your rating based on BOTH responses. Click here for the document to help determine the score. Use the tab labeled Strategy Only.|
|The strategy(ies) align with community challenge(s).||5|
|The strategy(ies) is responsive to the community participants and their particular needs.||5|
|There is compelling narrative about the success of the strategy(ies) over the past 12 months.||5|
|The strategy(ies) is based on best and/or evidence-based practices. If not, clearly explains reasoning.||5|
|Section 2, C: Reducing the Impact of Poverty
*UWABC is defining poverty not by the federal poverty guidelines, but in a broader context including not just those whose income does not allow them to meet basic needs such as food, clothing and shelter, but also taking into consideration levels of inequality in society.
|The strategy(ies) clearly align and support reducing the impact of poverty.||10|
|Section 2, D: Community Voice|
|The organization collects and uses feedback from the community members to support the development, implementation and evaluation of organization's activities. If not using, clearly explains why.||5|
|Section 2, E: Achievements|
|The organization provided a substantive answer to what they are most proud of and why.||3|
|The organization clearly describes what it has done, is currently doing, or planning to do to make the organization stronger.||5|
|Section 2, F: Critical Organizational Relationships|
|The organization collaborates and forms meaningful partnerships to achieve the mission.||5|
|Section 3, C: Internal Equity Support|
|If interested in additional funding, the organization provides a clear and realistic explanation for use of funds.||Y/N or N/A|
|Section 4, Results|
|*If the applicant included more than one result, choose your rating based on BOTH responses. Click here for the document to help determine the score. Use the tab labeled Results Only.|
|Section 4, Result(s) a & b: Participant Result|
|The organizational-level results & indicators clearly address one or more community-level results. Unless “other” is selected, this item should automatically be scored a “3”. If "other" is selected, provide a score based on your assessment.||3|
|Section 4, Result(s) c: Describe Indicator|
|The indicators for the organization's results are specific, clear and measurable.||3|
|Section 4, Result(s) d & e: Measurement Tool|
|The measurement tools are clearly explained, appropriate and enable the organization to determine if the results/indicators were achieved.||3|
|Section 4, Result(s) f: Describe Participants Supported|
|The explaination of the participant population is clear.||3|
|Section 4, Result(s) g & h: Number of Participants Supported & Successful|
|The number of participants supported and success rate is appropriate||3|
|5. BUDGET & BUDGET NARRATIVE|
|Section 5, Budget|
|Budget is complete and contains all required information.||2|
|The organization operates with revenues meeting or exceeding expenditures/ OR If the organization has a deficit, they understand their financial situation and have a plan for improvement.||2|
|Based on my review of the application, this organization should be considered for funding for the upcoming year.||Y/N|