ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
Papers
2
First AuthorYearTitleDOI
3
Allensworth2017
The Educational Benefits of Attending Higher Performing Schools: Evidence From Chicago High Schools
https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716672039
4
Deming2014
School choice, school quality, and postsecondary attainment
https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.3.991
5
Dobbie2014
The Impact of Attending a School with High-Achieving Peers: Evidence from the New York City Exam Schools
https://doi.org/10.1257/app.6.3.58
6
Abdulkadiroğlu2014
The Elite Illusion: Achievement Effects at Boston and New York Exam Schools
https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA10266
7
8
9
Data
10
KeySchool TestSchool GraduationSchool Black4-Year College EnrollmentSelective College Enrollment
11
PaperComparisonSourceTestDeltaSourceDeltaSourceDeltaSourceRaw DeltaDeltaSESlope estSlope SESourceRaw DeltaDeltaSESlope estSlope SE
12
AllensworthSelective v TopTable 1ACT6.05Table 111.73%Table 24.40%Table 70.33-0.010.024-0.030.07
Table 7 - "highly selective"
0.380.020.0630.050.17
13
AllensworthTop v MiddleTable 1ACT2.45Table 110.90%Table 2-11.70%Table 70.1850.020.0220.110.12
Table 7 - "highly selective"
0.020.020.0151.000.75
14
AllensworthTop v BottomTable 1ACT3.325Table 130.63%Table 2-33%Table 70.4550.040.0250.090.05
Table 7 - "highly selective"
0.050.060.0151.200.30
15
AllensworthMiddle v BottomTable 1ACT0.875Table 119.73%Table 2-21.30%Table 70.270.040.0180.150.07
Table 7 - "highly selective"
0.030.020.0070.670.23
16
DobbieStuyvesant v Bronx ScienceTable 1SAT123.549Table 11.90%Table 1-2%Table 1, Table 20.006-0.0230.017-3.832.83
Table 1, Table 2 - "SAT > 1300"
0.1980.0070.0210.040.11
17
DobbieBronx Science v Brooklyn TechTable 1SAT139.611Table 14%Table 1-9%Table 1, Table 20.057-0.0030.012-0.050.21
Table 1, Table 2 - "SAT > 1300"
0.192-0.0180.014-0.090.07
18
DobbieBrooklyn Tech v othern/an/a?n/a?n/a?Table 1, Table 20.343-0.0010.0120.000.03
Table 1, Table 2 - "SAT > 1300"
0.0835-0.0140.008-0.170.10
19
DemingMagnet v Non-Magnetn/an/a?n/a?n/a?Table 2, Table 30.06930.020.0580.290.84Table 3?0.0420.019?n/a
20
AbdulkadiroğluLatin School v Boston public schoolsTable A.1English test0.687n/a?Table A.1-8.90%
Table VI - "Nonparametric"
?-0.0560.044?n/a
Table VI - "Competitive", "Nonparametric"
?0.1010.049?n/a
21
Abdulkadiroğlu
Latin Academy v Boston public schools
Table A.1English test0.934n/a?Table A.1-18.20%
Table VI - "Nonparametric"
?0.060.035?n/a
Table VI - "Competitive", "Nonparametric"
?0.0520.044?n/a
22
AbdulkadiroğluO’Bryant v Boston public schoolsTable A.1English test1.218n/a?Table A.1-28.30%
Table VI - "Nonparametric"
?0.1010.04?n/a
Table VI - "Competitive", "Nonparametric"
?-0.10.045?n/a
23
24
meta estmeta semeta estmeta se
25
0.036649868760.02456522812-0.0076827278190.04695512624
26
27
28
Notes:
29
* Several of the cells above are estimated from the data in the paper and may not be perfectly accurate
30
* The model I'm using is that if the change in average outcome at a school changes by 1pp, then the causal effect of attending the school is K pp. The "Slope est" columns are estimates of K.
31
32
33
34
35
36
page 3 from
37
https://sci-hubtw.hkvisa.net/10.1257/aer.104.3.991
38
Moving to Opportunity (MTO) Experiment
39
(Kling, Liebman, and Katz 2007), as well as many recent studies in school settings (e.g., Hastings, Kane, and Staiger 2006; Anderson 2008; Angrist, Lang, and
40
Oreopoulos 2009; Angrist and Lavy 2009; Jackson 2010; Lavy and Schlosser 2011;
41
Lavy, Silva, and Weinhardt 2011; Legewie and DiPrete 2012)
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100