Is the Action fully or partially assessed through this record?

Is this an over-arching assessment of progress under this Action?

Organization's Interpretation

Indicate the level of subjectivity of the status/progress assessment

Timing of next anticipated update:

Link to (online) documentation/materials (e.g. Dropbox) that verify status/progress

Acronym(s) or short name(s) of the project(s) that support the implementation of this action

Is the Action fully or partially assessed through this record?

Is this an over-arching assessment of progress under this Action?

Provide the organization's interpretation of the SAP Action's specific meaning

Indicate the level of subjectivity of the status/progress assessment

Timing of next anticipated update:

Link to (online) documentation/materials (e.g. Dropbox) that verify status/progress

Acronym(s) or short name(s) of the project(s) that support the implementation of this action

Is the Action fully or partially assessed through this record?

Is this an over-arching assessment of progress under this Action?

Provide the organization's interpretation of the SAP Action's specific meaning

Indicate the level of subjectivity of the status/progress assessment

Timing of next anticipated update:

Link to (online) documentation/materials (e.g. Dropbox) that verify status/progress

Acronym(s) or short name(s) of the project(s) that support the implementation of this action

Is the Action fully or partially assessed through this record?

Is this an over-arching assessment of progress under this Action?

Provide the organization's interpretation of the SAP Action's specific meaning

Indicate the level of subjectivity of the status/progress assessment

Timing of next anticipated update:

Link to (online) documentation/materials (e.g. Dropbox) that verify status/progress

Acronym(s) or short name(s) of the project(s) that support the implementation of this action

Is the Action fully or partially assessed through this record?

Is this an over-arching assessment of progress under this Action?

Provide the organization's interpretation of the SAP Action's specific meaning

Indicate the level of subjectivity of the status/progress assessment

Timing of next anticipated update:

Link to (online) documentation/materials (e.g. Dropbox) that verify status/progress

Acronym(s) or short name(s) of the project(s) that support the implementation of this action

Is the Action fully or partially assessed through this record?

Is this an over-arching assessment of progress under this Action?

Provide the organization's interpretation of the SAP Action's specific meaning

Indicate the level of subjectivity of the status/progress assessment

Timing of next anticipated update:

Link to (online) documentation/materials (e.g. Dropbox) that verify status/progress

Acronym(s) or short name(s) of the project(s) that support the implementation of this action

Is the Action fully or partially assessed through this record?

Is this an over-arching assessment of progress under this Action?

NoFilter - hidden

4.8 Operationalise and strengthen interlinked Decision Support Systems (DSSs) for the protection of reefs and associated ecosystems and for the sustainable management of associated living marine resources

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

https://www.unenvironment.org/cep/ratification-map-cartagena-convention-and-oil-spills-protocol

Facilitated throught the SPAW EBM Project funded by the Government of Italy

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnuc6dwrK57oQ6oFTg-ljtW_D9IViT-LEKbcrkTTQVczr1l8RAvb23gq435ywiXHFsEE

4.8 Operationalise and strengthen interlinked Decision Support Systems (DSSs) for the protection of reefs and associated ecosystems and for the sustainable management of associated living marine resources

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

https://www.unenvironment.org/cep/ratification-map-cartagena-convention-and-oil-spills-protocol

Facilitated throught the SPAW EBM Project funded by the Government of Italy

S3 - Regional Coordination

3.3 Adopt and operationalise the permanent regional policy coordination mechanism for shared Living Marine Resources (sLMR) governance

Completed implementation of the action would mean: (a) there is a functioning regional Ocean Coordination Mechanism, with as members the vast majority of States & Territories from the Wider Caribbean region/OCM MoU area, as well as all, or nearly all, eligible IGOs (see the OCM MoU and its Annex 1); (b) an OCM Work Plan has been adopted, has funds available for its implementation; (c) the Work Plan is under implementation; (d) sustained operations of the OCM are enabled for at least the short to medium term.

The text of a non-legally binding MoU that will enable the creation of the regional Ocean Coordination Mechanism was approved by countries and regional organizations participating in the Final and Special CLME+ Project Steering Committee Meeting celebrated in October 2021. Following a language reconciliation of the English, French and Spanish versions of the OCM MoU text, the MoU was formally opened for signature at a High-Level Ministerial Segment of the Cartagena Convention IGM/COP celebrated in Aruba, in October 2023. To date (16 August 2024), 11 countries and 7 IGO's have already signed the MoU. As per the conditions set under the MoU, 6 additional country signatures are now needed for the OCM to become formally established. Operationalization of the OCM before year end is currently being targetted. The UNDP/GEF PROCARIBE+ Project (2023-2028) brings funding to the region that will enable the functioning of the OCM, once established. In the mean time, the Interim Coordination Mechanism (IGOs only) continues to function. The ICM will cease to exist and be replaced by the OCM, once the latter becomes operational.

Before the end of 2024 / when the minimum amount of signatures required to operationalize the OCM has been obtained.

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1dIWDAMl3XHWN3hHyd4o-QMrAObeAEI1Ef5TJ5ZBLoaM/edit#response=ACYDBNhc-MmX5aIQZJ9SoNVfcJRsjGchiXpgCJg2v8uFmXQw9H1MjjiVmRTDmVR3Vh1Pgz8

3.3 Adopt and operationalise the permanent regional policy coordination mechanism for shared Living Marine Resources (sLMR) governance

Completed implementation of the action would mean: (a) there is a functioning regional Ocean Coordination Mechanism, with as members the vast majority of States & Territories from the Wider Caribbean region/OCM MoU area, as well as all, or nearly all, eligible IGOs (see the OCM MoU and its Annex 1); (b) an OCM Work Plan has been adopted, has funds available for its implementation; (c) the Work Plan is under implementation; (d) sustained operations of the OCM are enabled for at least the short to medium term.

The text of a non-legally binding MoU that will enable the creation of the regional Ocean Coordination Mechanism was approved by countries and regional organizations participating in the Final and Special CLME+ Project Steering Committee Meeting celebrated in October 2021. Following a language reconciliation of the English, French and Spanish versions of the OCM MoU text, the MoU was formally opened for signature at a High-Level Ministerial Segment of the Cartagena Convention IGM/COP celebrated in Aruba, in October 2023. To date (16 August 2024), 11 countries and 7 IGO's have already signed the MoU. As per the conditions set under the MoU, 6 additional country signatures are now needed for the OCM to become formally established. Operationalization of the OCM before year end is currently being targetted. The UNDP/GEF PROCARIBE+ Project (2023-2028) brings funding to the region that will enable the functioning of the OCM, once established. In the mean time, the Interim Coordination Mechanism (IGOs only) continues to function. The ICM will cease to exist and be replaced by the OCM, once the latter becomes operational.

Before the end of 2024 / when the minimum amount of signatures required to operationalize the OCM has been obtained.

S3 - Regional Coordination

3.3 Adopt and operationalise the permanent regional policy coordination mechanism for shared Living Marine Resources (sLMR) governance

Language reconciliation of the 3 language versions of the approved OCM MOU text by the UN Divsion of Conference Services, Nairobi

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1dIWDAMl3XHWN3hHyd4o-QMrAObeAEI1Ef5TJ5ZBLoaM/edit#response=ACYDBNjObfMH_kqcoZemN-PYJxe1GhZxJp_pKE9CGn7hbzH1Cs7yrdr7_NmUKDT-dLoLxm0

3.3 Adopt and operationalise the permanent regional policy coordination mechanism for shared Living Marine Resources (sLMR) governance

Language reconciliation of the 3 language versions of the approved OCM MOU text by the UN Divsion of Conference Services, Nairobi

1.1 Establish and operationalise a formal agreement for coordinated action with Brazil

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

Wider Caribbean Region (Convention Area comprising of GOM and Caribbean LMEs) and the North Brazil Shelf LME, which is currently outside of the legal geographic scope of the Cartagena Convention.

Brazil is not a signatory to the Cartagena Convention nor does it fall within the legal scope of the Convention Area. However there is strong connectivity between the North Brazil shelf LME and the Caribbean LME with transboundary pollution originating in Brazil affecting other parts of the Wider Caribbean Region as evidenced by nutrients and sediment run-off. This activity should result in a formal mechanism for cooperation between UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat and the Government of Brazil proposed initially through the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding between the Cartagena Convention Secretariat and the Government of Brazil. Once signed, consideration would be given to the expansion of the legal scope of the Cartagena Convention to include the North Brazil Shelf LME.

The UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat and the Brazilian Government have jointly worked on the content for the MoU to facilitate improved collaboration. This was preceded by formal missions and participation by delegates from the Government of Brazil at meetings of the Cartagena Convention Secretariat. Despite repeated efforts, the process is currently stalled due to what appears to be a lack of continued political interest by the Government of Brazil following a recent change in Administration. However, the Secretariat partnered with the University of Para in the development of the Regional Nutrients Pollution Reduction Strategy which includes the NE Brazil Shelf and Amazon Basin. It is hoped that this type of collaboration can continue through joint projects and activities while aiming to have a more formal legal agreement for cooperation. Discussions are ongoing with the UNEP Regional Office in Panama and national office in Brazil to assist with that process.

Immediately upon change in status/progress rating

www.unenvironment.cep/org

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnudL3EZ06BwK1HUEvQ-gcHGbdXDn6boLFmQl6xwt5ChqLN_q3ybGCQqSiiy8yxhH874

1.1 Establish and operationalise a formal agreement for coordinated action with Brazil

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

Wider Caribbean Region (Convention Area comprising of GOM and Caribbean LMEs) and the North Brazil Shelf LME, which is currently outside of the legal geographic scope of the Cartagena Convention.

Brazil is not a signatory to the Cartagena Convention nor does it fall within the legal scope of the Convention Area. However there is strong connectivity between the North Brazil shelf LME and the Caribbean LME with transboundary pollution originating in Brazil affecting other parts of the Wider Caribbean Region as evidenced by nutrients and sediment run-off. This activity should result in a formal mechanism for cooperation between UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat and the Government of Brazil proposed initially through the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding between the Cartagena Convention Secretariat and the Government of Brazil. Once signed, consideration would be given to the expansion of the legal scope of the Cartagena Convention to include the North Brazil Shelf LME.

The UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat and the Brazilian Government have jointly worked on the content for the MoU to facilitate improved collaboration. This was preceded by formal missions and participation by delegates from the Government of Brazil at meetings of the Cartagena Convention Secretariat. Despite repeated efforts, the process is currently stalled due to what appears to be a lack of continued political interest by the Government of Brazil following a recent change in Administration. However, the Secretariat partnered with the University of Para in the development of the Regional Nutrients Pollution Reduction Strategy which includes the NE Brazil Shelf and Amazon Basin. It is hoped that this type of collaboration can continue through joint projects and activities while aiming to have a more formal legal agreement for cooperation. Discussions are ongoing with the UNEP Regional Office in Panama and national office in Brazil to assist with that process.

Immediately upon change in status/progress rating

www.unenvironment.cep/org

5B.3 Strengthen the Region´s position in the ICCAT decision making process through enhanced intra-regional coordination and cooperation

In an attempt to strengthen collaboration between ICCAT and WECAFC for the management of large pelagics, ICCAT and WECAFC Secretariat are considering agreeing on an MoU for enhanced coorporation.

Further at the time of this update over 10 WECAFC countries were contracting parties to ICCAT.

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnufa6tHLlmLSxhS6fSK2XVRFouxcOCLQca6pD9y91Qv0fQouWyngVlnw3zzs_bgdlzw

5B.1 Establish key agreements and operationalise arrangements among organizations with a stake in large pelagics fisheries in order to implement EAF

To strengthen and formailse collaboration in the management of large pelagics, WECAFC and ICCAT Secretariats are considering signing a MoU. Further ICCAT is being invited to participate in Joint Working Group meetings in the WECAFC Region that address large pelagic species.

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnudNHY9l-JbAeO7ZeQkPDu5ooiBkAZWmWRacawpJkn0ncy5YesQ78DuB-U5hmxVsElk

S5 - Pelagic Subecosystem

5.6 Operationalise and further enhance an integrated, sub-regional decision support system (DSS) for the pelagic fisheries (linking large pelagics and flyingfish fisheries, and with additional linkages to DSSs for ecosystem/environmental protection, as relevant)

During WECAFC 17 the countries endorsed the establishment of a Joint Flyingfish and Dolphinfish Working Group. The first meeting of the Working Group where the Work Plan will be discusses is planned for December 2021.

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnuc6BTtdm4FZfNNw5NbOEej23_yGKWYiyCXgTgOZNCJO0t8MBxJSINRXDWvBMX4Wci4

S5 - Pelagic Subecosystem

5.1 Establish linkages between the sub-regional governance arrangements for the different types of pelagic fisheries in order to more fully implement the ecosystem approach (e.g.: prey–predator relationships)

At the 17 Session of WECAFC, in the USA, in July 2019, the Commission agreed to expand the mandate of the existing Joint Working Group on Flying Fish in the Eastern Caribbean to incorporate flying fish, dolphinfish and other pelagic species not managed by ICCAT. The first Meeting of the flyingfish and dolphinfish working group is expected to take place in December 2021.
In an attempt to strengthen collaboration FAO WECAFC and ICCAT are in the process of formalizing an MOU to support enhanced co-orperation.

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnuf9rpX_sQyEyhlv02cmr1puHiFipUwDqJJqxv9gXqs_F1qSzwBPRaLWsL2i7ffdlOU

S3 - Regional Coordination

3.6 Develop and coordinate integrated and sectoral sustainable financing strategies for the cost-effective implementation of broader ocean governance in the region, with a short and medium term focus on sLMR governance

Wider Caribbean Region/CLME+ region

During the Third PSC Meeting which took place in February 2021, the Steering Committee:
Indicated preliminary support for the following approach towards achieving short, medium and long-term sustainability of the Coordination Mechanism, while acknowledging the Steering Group of the Coordination Mechanism may revisit and adjust the approach, and taking into account that a number of States and Territories have voiced their opposition to mandatory financial contributions:

• Short & medium-term (2021/2-2027):
○ Coordination Mechanism Secretariat and other Organs operate (largely) with financial support from the PROCARIBE+ Project
○ PROCARIBE+ Project period used to demonstrate and evaluate CM added value
○ CM considers a range of options and decides, prior to PROCARIBE+ Project end, on post-Project financing mechanism(s)

• Long-term (2027 and beyond):
○ Deployment of sustainable financing mechanism(s) endorsed by the Coordination Mechanism Steering Group.

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnudjFo5lPhN797Oaju0obS4OEw-JomRvZAHWP8yqPOLYY4Q2Cuzbgipjyv3QBj0HAjE

3.6 Develop and coordinate integrated and sectoral sustainable financing strategies for the cost-effective implementation of broader ocean governance in the region, with a short and medium term focus on sLMR governance

Wider Caribbean Region/CLME+ region

During the Third PSC Meeting which took place in February 2021, the Steering Committee:
Indicated preliminary support for the following approach towards achieving short, medium and long-term sustainability of the Coordination Mechanism, while acknowledging the Steering Group of the Coordination Mechanism may revisit and adjust the approach, and taking into account that a number of States and Territories have voiced their opposition to mandatory financial contributions:

• Short & medium-term (2021/2-2027):
○ Coordination Mechanism Secretariat and other Organs operate (largely) with financial support from the PROCARIBE+ Project
○ PROCARIBE+ Project period used to demonstrate and evaluate CM added value
○ CM considers a range of options and decides, prior to PROCARIBE+ Project end, on post-Project financing mechanism(s)

• Long-term (2027 and beyond):
○ Deployment of sustainable financing mechanism(s) endorsed by the Coordination Mechanism Steering Group.

S3 - Regional Coordination

3.3 Adopt and operationalise the permanent regional policy coordination mechanism for shared Living Marine Resources (sLMR) governance

Caribbean and North Brazil Shelf LME

1. Core aspects (mandate, functions, structure,...) of the forthcoming Ocean Coordination Mechanism (CM) were agreed upon by the CLME+ Project Steering Committee at the June 2020 Special virtual CLME+ Project Steering Committee Meeting. 2. A drafting group was created by the Project Steering Committee to advance a draft text for the MoU (through which the CM will be created), for further negotiations at the October 2020 Special virtual CLME+ Project Steering Committee Meeting. 3. The October 2020 PSC Meeting achieved agreement on most of the proposed MOU text, with 3 outstanding parragraphs being separated for further negotiations. 4. During the Third PSC Meeting which took place in February 2021, the Steering Committee technically endorsed the content of the Memorandum of Understanding Enabling the Creation of a Coordination Mechanism to Support Integrated Ocean Governance in the Caribbean and North Brazil Shelf Large Marine Ecosystems and the associated Annex 1. A Special Project Steering Committee Meeting is planned for June 2021 to obtainl legal clearance of the MOU, and, once this is achieved, initiating the accession process (signing of the MOU by prospective CM members)

https://clmeplus.org/regional-coordination-mechanisms/#CM

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnueovBSapZZb0AOlfiaEJJtOeskyPIA681MrxMnYbCL5oofiuE3AnHt37TGpUUU96-o

3.3 Adopt and operationalise the permanent regional policy coordination mechanism for shared Living Marine Resources (sLMR) governance

Caribbean and North Brazil Shelf LME

1. Core aspects (mandate, functions, structure,...) of the forthcoming Ocean Coordination Mechanism (CM) were agreed upon by the CLME+ Project Steering Committee at the June 2020 Special virtual CLME+ Project Steering Committee Meeting. 2. A drafting group was created by the Project Steering Committee to advance a draft text for the MoU (through which the CM will be created), for further negotiations at the October 2020 Special virtual CLME+ Project Steering Committee Meeting. 3. The October 2020 PSC Meeting achieved agreement on most of the proposed MOU text, with 3 outstanding parragraphs being separated for further negotiations. 4. During the Third PSC Meeting which took place in February 2021, the Steering Committee technically endorsed the content of the Memorandum of Understanding Enabling the Creation of a Coordination Mechanism to Support Integrated Ocean Governance in the Caribbean and North Brazil Shelf Large Marine Ecosystems and the associated Annex 1. A Special Project Steering Committee Meeting is planned for June 2021 to obtainl legal clearance of the MOU, and, once this is achieved, initiating the accession process (signing of the MOU by prospective CM members)

https://clmeplus.org/regional-coordination-mechanisms/#CM

S2 - Sustainable Fisheries

2.1 Establish an interim arrangement for sustainable fisheries coordinated by FAO-WECAFC and including CRFM; OSPESCA; and OECS

WECAFC Area/Wider Caribbean Region/CLME+ region

MOU formally establishing the Interim Coordination Mechanism for Sustainable Fisheries (FICM) was established through an MOU signed by three Regional Fisheries Bodies (CRFM, OSPESCA and WECAFC-FAO) in January 2016. The MOU seeks to enhance the regional governance for sustainable fisheries. To date, 12 meetings of the FICM have taken place with the last meeting held in April 2021. In December 2020 the three Regional Fisheries Bodies agreed to a 5 year extension of the Fisheries ICM MOU to January 2026.

https://clmeplus.org/app/uploads/2019/09/160127-MoU-IFCM-signed-English.pdf; https://clmeplus.org/app/uploads/2020/12/SIGNED-MoU-CRFM-WECAFC-OSPESCA-December-3-2020.pdf

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnucMqKrJRVHJHkpTUljSLHW4mJLhNfKwpNSRDYmYU_M5iOwBjJiY7X9SOEyyqSBolyg

2.1 Establish an interim arrangement for sustainable fisheries coordinated by FAO-WECAFC and including CRFM; OSPESCA; and OECS

WECAFC Area/Wider Caribbean Region/CLME+ region

MOU formally establishing the Interim Coordination Mechanism for Sustainable Fisheries (FICM) was established through an MOU signed by three Regional Fisheries Bodies (CRFM, OSPESCA and WECAFC-FAO) in January 2016. The MOU seeks to enhance the regional governance for sustainable fisheries. To date, 12 meetings of the FICM have taken place with the last meeting held in April 2021. In December 2020 the three Regional Fisheries Bodies agreed to a 5 year extension of the Fisheries ICM MOU to January 2026.

https://clmeplus.org/app/uploads/2019/09/160127-MoU-IFCM-signed-English.pdf; https://clmeplus.org/app/uploads/2020/12/SIGNED-MoU-CRFM-WECAFC-OSPESCA-December-3-2020.pdf

S2 - Sustainable Fisheries

2.5 Establish and/or enhance the capacity of the regional, sub-regional and national fisheries institutions to develop and implement harmonized management and conservation measures, with special focus on Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing (IUU) and Monitoring, Control & Surveillance (MCS)

WECAFC Area/Wider Caribbean Region/CLME+ region

[implementation of the RPOA - how will/can this be measured?]

FAO WECAFC issued a questionnaire to its countries to determine the readiness of countries to implement the endorsed RPOA IUU. Results of the questionnaire should be available by mid 2021. The responses will also be utilised to support the preparation of a project concept to the GEF Secretariat in 2022 to support the implementation of the RPOA IUU

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnudKRKehxPy8MqP3siFVW8D4n7eAYsOiuLLHMvw0Qhw6cSOZRz-P3gn3CpsRGTAhWu4

2.5 Establish and/or enhance the capacity of the regional, sub-regional and national fisheries institutions to develop and implement harmonized management and conservation measures, with special focus on Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing (IUU) and Monitoring, Control & Surveillance (MCS)

WECAFC Area/Wider Caribbean Region/CLME+ region

[implementation of the RPOA - how will/can this be measured?]

FAO WECAFC issued a questionnaire to its countries to determine the readiness of countries to implement the endorsed RPOA IUU. Results of the questionnaire should be available by mid 2021. The responses will also be utilised to support the preparation of a project concept to the GEF Secretariat in 2022 to support the implementation of the RPOA IUU

S2 - Sustainable Fisheries

2.5 Establish and/or enhance the capacity of the regional, sub-regional and national fisheries institutions to develop and implement harmonized management and conservation measures, with special focus on Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing (IUU) and Monitoring, Control & Surveillance (MCS)

WECAFC Area/Wider Caribbean Region/CLME+ region

[development and adoption of RPOA on IUU, development of model NPOA IUU]

The Regional Plan of Action to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing (RPOA-IUU), which was produced by the WECAFC/CRFM/OSPESCA Regional Working Group on Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing was presented to the 17 Session of WECAFC, in July 2019, for their consideration. The Commission examined the RPOA-IUU and requested that some amendments be made to remove all language alluding to a legally binding character, the reference to non-existing or draft instruments and non-approved recommendations. With these edits, the Commission endorsed the RPOA-IUU, noting that its endorsement represented a significant advancement that will support strengthened legislation and policies. However, it was recognized that enforcement remained a challenge for WECAFC members and direct collaborative work among WECAFC members was encouraged. The Commission also recommended regular review of Members’ implementation of the RPOA-IUU to assess and advance progress. This could be undertaken at future intersessional meetings of the Regional Working Group on IUU Fishing.

http://www.fao.org/3/ca9457t/CA9457T.pdf

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnucqSg3uy_9GXWCy93DCvAhMc3k0AeJOdglBqTvC9TJTsvoDZMksVkzbV39sl_e-Me4

2.5 Establish and/or enhance the capacity of the regional, sub-regional and national fisheries institutions to develop and implement harmonized management and conservation measures, with special focus on Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing (IUU) and Monitoring, Control & Surveillance (MCS)

WECAFC Area/Wider Caribbean Region/CLME+ region

[development and adoption of RPOA on IUU, development of model NPOA IUU]

The Regional Plan of Action to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing (RPOA-IUU), which was produced by the WECAFC/CRFM/OSPESCA Regional Working Group on Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing was presented to the 17 Session of WECAFC, in July 2019, for their consideration. The Commission examined the RPOA-IUU and requested that some amendments be made to remove all language alluding to a legally binding character, the reference to non-existing or draft instruments and non-approved recommendations. With these edits, the Commission endorsed the RPOA-IUU, noting that its endorsement represented a significant advancement that will support strengthened legislation and policies. However, it was recognized that enforcement remained a challenge for WECAFC members and direct collaborative work among WECAFC members was encouraged. The Commission also recommended regular review of Members’ implementation of the RPOA-IUU to assess and advance progress. This could be undertaken at future intersessional meetings of the Regional Working Group on IUU Fishing.

http://www.fao.org/3/ca9457t/CA9457T.pdf

S2 - Sustainable Fisheries

2.3 Evaluate the needs and the options, agree on the mandate & operationalise a Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (RFMO) or alternative arrangement for the management of shared living marine resources (as applicable*)

The WECAFC reorientation process is under development and several actions have been taken with member countries and internally in order to catalyse the process. The First WECAFC Preparatory Meeting for the Transformation into a Regional Fisheries Management Arrangement was held in Bridgetown, Barbados, 25-26 March 2019 (http://www.fao.org/3/ca8259t/CA8259T.pdf). The participants reviewed the discussion paper prepared by an independent legal consultant in support of the WECAFC Strategic Reorientation Process and the relevant themes that needed to be addressed in considering institutional alternatives. A possible structure was discussed, the details of which would have to be worked out, of a new entity/arrangement that would have an advisory role in science, capacity building, technology transfer, and monitoring, control and surveillance (MCS), and where binding conservation and management measures (CMM) decisions could be made at the level of the Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction (ABNJ), with the possibility of retaining the option to include the EEZ in order to maintain flexibility for certain stocks/species, as it is done under the North Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) Convention. Other aspects that would need to be included would be the fight against IUU fishing and trade issues, such as traceability and catch documentation schemes. The entity/arrangement would also have to be consistent with the United Nations Law of the Sea Convention and other relevant international fisheries instruments. The summary report of the Preparatory Meeting was presented for review and endorsement at the 17th Session of the WECAFC that took place in Miami, USA, 15-18 July 2019 (http://www.fao.org/3/ca8748t/CA8748T.pdf). Member states endorsed the conclusions of the 1st Preparatory Meeting for the WECAFC reorientation process towards a more effective and viable arrangement. The next steps include a review of experiences by similar entities and arrangements, and discuss the most adequate system for the region. Members agreed on Terms of Reference for an Inter-Sessional Working Group that will review and provide options and recommendations for a 2nd Preparatory Meeting currently scheduled to take place before of the end of 2021. In collaboration with the WECAFC Secretariat a letter of agreement (LOA) with INFOPESCA has been signed in order to, among others, prepare relevant technical documents for the 2nd Preparatory Meeting, particularly to issue a brief on the WECAFC strategic reorientation and to prepare a comprehensive report on progress towards the development of a model for a regional fisheries management entity or arrangement. In this context a virtual meeting was held on 23 October 2020 in order, among others, to present and discuss the report on the findings of the questionnaire to gather priorities and experiences to inform the WECAFC Ad Hoc Intersessional Working Group to progress towards the developments of a model for a regional fisheries management entity or arrangement in the WECAFC Area.

http://www.fao.org/3/ca8259t/CA8259T.pdf; http://www.fao.org/3/ca8748t/CA8748T.pdf

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnud6s57qb1nWgTLALOp9MYHp1m_Mpfmaj5DimxIpFWaMihWT_zfr_6nfjejvUBKdl9k

2.3 Evaluate the needs and the options, agree on the mandate & operationalise a Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (RFMO) or alternative arrangement for the management of shared living marine resources (as applicable*)

The WECAFC reorientation process is under development and several actions have been taken with member countries and internally in order to catalyse the process. The First WECAFC Preparatory Meeting for the Transformation into a Regional Fisheries Management Arrangement was held in Bridgetown, Barbados, 25-26 March 2019 (http://www.fao.org/3/ca8259t/CA8259T.pdf). The participants reviewed the discussion paper prepared by an independent legal consultant in support of the WECAFC Strategic Reorientation Process and the relevant themes that needed to be addressed in considering institutional alternatives. A possible structure was discussed, the details of which would have to be worked out, of a new entity/arrangement that would have an advisory role in science, capacity building, technology transfer, and monitoring, control and surveillance (MCS), and where binding conservation and management measures (CMM) decisions could be made at the level of the Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction (ABNJ), with the possibility of retaining the option to include the EEZ in order to maintain flexibility for certain stocks/species, as it is done under the North Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) Convention. Other aspects that would need to be included would be the fight against IUU fishing and trade issues, such as traceability and catch documentation schemes. The entity/arrangement would also have to be consistent with the United Nations Law of the Sea Convention and other relevant international fisheries instruments. The summary report of the Preparatory Meeting was presented for review and endorsement at the 17th Session of the WECAFC that took place in Miami, USA, 15-18 July 2019 (http://www.fao.org/3/ca8748t/CA8748T.pdf). Member states endorsed the conclusions of the 1st Preparatory Meeting for the WECAFC reorientation process towards a more effective and viable arrangement. The next steps include a review of experiences by similar entities and arrangements, and discuss the most adequate system for the region. Members agreed on Terms of Reference for an Inter-Sessional Working Group that will review and provide options and recommendations for a 2nd Preparatory Meeting currently scheduled to take place before of the end of 2021. In collaboration with the WECAFC Secretariat a letter of agreement (LOA) with INFOPESCA has been signed in order to, among others, prepare relevant technical documents for the 2nd Preparatory Meeting, particularly to issue a brief on the WECAFC strategic reorientation and to prepare a comprehensive report on progress towards the development of a model for a regional fisheries management entity or arrangement. In this context a virtual meeting was held on 23 October 2020 in order, among others, to present and discuss the report on the findings of the questionnaire to gather priorities and experiences to inform the WECAFC Ad Hoc Intersessional Working Group to progress towards the developments of a model for a regional fisheries management entity or arrangement in the WECAFC Area.

http://www.fao.org/3/ca8259t/CA8259T.pdf; http://www.fao.org/3/ca8748t/CA8748T.pdf

S2 - Sustainable Fisheries

2.2 Review, and reform WECAFC as needed to clarify and strengthen its mandate and relationships with Regional Fisheries Bodies such as CRFM, OSPESCA and ICCAT

The WECAFC reorientation process is under development and several actions have been taken with member countries and internally in order to catalyse the process. The First WECAFC Preparatory Meeting for the Transformation into a Regional Fisheries Management Arrangement was held in Bridgetown, Barbados, 25-26 March 2019 (http://www.fao.org/3/ca8259t/CA8259T.pdf). The participants reviewed the discussion paper prepared by an independent legal consultant in support of the WECAFC Strategic Reorientation Process and the relevant themes that needed to be addressed in considering institutional alternatives. A possible structure was discussed, the details of which would have to be worked out, of a new entity/arrangement that would have an advisory role in science, capacity building, technology transfer, and monitoring, control and surveillance (MCS), and where binding conservation and management measures (CMM) decisions could be made at the level of the Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction (ABNJ), with the possibility of retaining the option to include the EEZ in order to maintain flexibility for certain stocks/species, as it is done under the North Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) Convention. Other aspects that would need to be included would be the fight against IUU fishing and trade issues, such as traceability and catch documentation schemes. The entity/arrangement would also have to be consistent with the United Nations Law of the Sea Convention and other relevant international fisheries instruments. The summary report of the Preparatory Meeting was presented for review and endorsement at the 17th Session of the WECAFC that took place in Miami, USA, 15-18 July 2019 (http://www.fao.org/3/ca8748t/CA8748T.pdf). Member states endorsed the conclusions of the 1st Preparatory Meeting for the WECAFC reorientation process towards a more effective and viable arrangement.

http://www.fao.org/3/ca8259t/CA8259T.pdf; http://www.fao.org/3/ca8748t/CA8748T.pdf

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnudCKIyityjsVnPI4-qXWTcmZxJ2exvDDZaJKgA8ewJQWraAcMM3seDSgzIW02aOVBE

2.2 Review, and reform WECAFC as needed to clarify and strengthen its mandate and relationships with Regional Fisheries Bodies such as CRFM, OSPESCA and ICCAT

The WECAFC reorientation process is under development and several actions have been taken with member countries and internally in order to catalyse the process. The First WECAFC Preparatory Meeting for the Transformation into a Regional Fisheries Management Arrangement was held in Bridgetown, Barbados, 25-26 March 2019 (http://www.fao.org/3/ca8259t/CA8259T.pdf). The participants reviewed the discussion paper prepared by an independent legal consultant in support of the WECAFC Strategic Reorientation Process and the relevant themes that needed to be addressed in considering institutional alternatives. A possible structure was discussed, the details of which would have to be worked out, of a new entity/arrangement that would have an advisory role in science, capacity building, technology transfer, and monitoring, control and surveillance (MCS), and where binding conservation and management measures (CMM) decisions could be made at the level of the Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction (ABNJ), with the possibility of retaining the option to include the EEZ in order to maintain flexibility for certain stocks/species, as it is done under the North Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) Convention. Other aspects that would need to be included would be the fight against IUU fishing and trade issues, such as traceability and catch documentation schemes. The entity/arrangement would also have to be consistent with the United Nations Law of the Sea Convention and other relevant international fisheries instruments. The summary report of the Preparatory Meeting was presented for review and endorsement at the 17th Session of the WECAFC that took place in Miami, USA, 15-18 July 2019 (http://www.fao.org/3/ca8748t/CA8748T.pdf). Member states endorsed the conclusions of the 1st Preparatory Meeting for the WECAFC reorientation process towards a more effective and viable arrangement.

http://www.fao.org/3/ca8259t/CA8259T.pdf; http://www.fao.org/3/ca8748t/CA8748T.pdf

4A.1 Establish, strengthen, and coordinate arrangements between the FAO-WECAFC, OSPESCA, UNEP-SPAW, and CRFM for harmonizing the spiny lobster fishery governance and management throughout the CLME+ region

Establish agreements (Memoranda and Agreements) that allow collaborating on issues of governance and management of Caribbean lobster fisheries on fisheries and environmental issues.

The Fisheries Interim Coordination Mechanism was established in 2015. Since then 12 meetings have taken place, and the governance in the lobster fishery is included in the mechanism's work plan. This interim coordination mechanism is transitioning into a long-term coordination mechanism.

https://clmeplus.org/regional-coordination-mechanisms/

CLME (Subproject MASPLESCA), CLME+ (Sub-project Ecolangosta+)

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnueL5zKKHhiHiLBXRs0JSQ5XmDGH-mm7miCZA55YvxuLLvQtmMZnkVCQy_V3T7Izu1o

4A.1 Establish, strengthen, and coordinate arrangements between the FAO-WECAFC, OSPESCA, UNEP-SPAW, and CRFM for harmonizing the spiny lobster fishery governance and management throughout the CLME+ region

Establish agreements (Memoranda and Agreements) that allow collaborating on issues of governance and management of Caribbean lobster fisheries on fisheries and environmental issues.

The Fisheries Interim Coordination Mechanism was established in 2015. Since then 12 meetings have taken place, and the governance in the lobster fishery is included in the mechanism's work plan. This interim coordination mechanism is transitioning into a long-term coordination mechanism.

https://clmeplus.org/regional-coordination-mechanisms/

CLME (Subproject MASPLESCA), CLME+ (Sub-project Ecolangosta+)

4B.3 Develop, adopt and implement the sub-regional agreements for the management of the queen conch resource

The regional regional plan called for the establishment of three sub-groups, two of them have been established. It was decided not to create the third one.

The Statistical, Scientific and Technical Advisory Group, within the QC Working Group was established in 2018, at the third Working Group meeting. It continues to be functional. The Education and outreach Group initiated activities. Governance group would not be established directly, but will utilize the CLME+ Coordination Mechanism in place.

At the sixth Meeting of the QC Working Group.

http://www.fao.org/fishery/rfb/wecafc/en

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnuc2DhajKHvhCcdXLZw6M2d7hYr3DEicaSeh94tT31Li353wCmEJaRMDRI-IM_PFFis

4B.3 Develop, adopt and implement the sub-regional agreements for the management of the queen conch resource

4B.1 Establish, strengthen and coordinate the arrangements for the management and conservation of queen conch between all relevant organizations such as CFMC,FAO-WECAFC, CRFM, UNEP-SPAW, OSPESCA and CITES

The QC Working Group was established back in 2012 and since then had met five times, usually every other year. The sixth QC Working Group is currently being scheduled by December 2021, depending on current situation.

http://www.fao.org/fishery/rfb/wecafc/en

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnuf2jOEPFLLGQY0D42uzxoxxQQcb8mnJEE5DsCxqAT0iZjgsa3QBbDs-Nbr4t8DnYtA

4B.1 Establish, strengthen and coordinate the arrangements for the management and conservation of queen conch between all relevant organizations such as CFMC,FAO-WECAFC, CRFM, UNEP-SPAW, OSPESCA and CITES

5A.3 Operationalise and strengthen an integrated, sub-regional decision support system (DSS) for the flyingfish fisheries (in coordination with the large pelagics arrangements)

Southern Eastern CAribbean

Improved stakeholder access to data and information of relevance to application of the EAF assessment and management of eastern Caribbean flyingfish and improved availability of data and information to the global community through:
• updated, as well as broadened, multi-objective assessment of the eastern Caribbean flyingfish fisheries;
• comprehensive and gender-sensitive valuation (social and economic) of the current and potential future contribution of flyingfish and associated pelagic fisheries;
• options for value chain problem-solving; refined operational objectives, indicators and reference points for monitoring and evaluation of management measures, incorporating goals for achieving gender equality and youth development;
• recommendations made consistent with the revised sub-regional FMP, including provisions for further development of data collection systems;
• vessel census (as information is available) for quantifying existing fishing effort and fishing capacity;
• revising the Sub-regional Fisheries Management Plan for Flyingfish in the Eastern Caribbean, taking into account present and emerging management needs;
• evaluation of management performance at the national and regional levels;
• identification of key data and information requirements, associated sources of data and information and the mechanisms for data and information sharing at the regional, national, sectoral and local levels to inform development of a DSS;
• formulation of a proposal to inform development of a decision support system

All be done through the CLME+ subproject #3 EAF for flyingfish fisheries

CRFM portal when updated otherwise CLME+ subproject #3 EAF for flyingfish fisheries Final Technical Report

CLME+ Flyingfish Sub-Project

CLME+ subproject #3 EAF for flyingfish fisheries

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnueFwzyzztX5MwVqIWO2xrN7lFT1Defr2hWZQByn3uajD_7FlDu9XnHQkY9YtcElSTQ

5A.4 Strengthen the FAO-WECAFC and CRFM capacity to develop, adopt and implement management and conservation measures for the flyingfish fisheries (full policy cycle implementation)

Southern Eastern Caribbean

Carry out National stakeholder consultations for FMP monitoring and evaluation. As appropriate, propose new/updated management recommendations taking into account the need to incorporate present and emerging management needs, including the need to establish a limited vessel entry system, to reduce and eliminate IUU fishing practices, to reduce possible impacts of present fishing strategies on long-term flyingfish recruitment, and to improve resilience to climate change and climate variability impacts. Propose recommendations for further development of national data collection systems in support of the EAF assessment and management of the eastern Caribbean Flyingfish fishery. Propose model national vessel licensing regulations formulated for adoption in accordance with legislation.

These are all outputs of the CLME+ flyingfish sub project

CLME+ flyigfish subproject Final Technical Report (link to be provided once uploaded to CRFM Portal)

CLME+ Flyingfish Sub-Project

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnucpPf3jqrRxC1RNPlzyj5D4tg8JY2aRTA32jcSUEiqhTazpfeNHCqjRdk7_oT8hr_A

5A.6 Develop and implement education and awareness building initiatives to improve understanding and enhanced stakeholder commitment and participation in planning and decision-making in the flyingfish fisheries

Southern Eastern Caribbean

Develop and implement education and awareness building initiatives to improve understanding and enhanced stakeholder commitment and participation in planning and decision-making in the flyingfish fisheries

While these activities have been carried out and outputs produced, the outcomes will need to be facilitated through continued action by/with other organisations/entities

CLME+ Flyingfish Sub-Project

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnucBjll8ixGgUJd_2Sm83AQLF-1fv7751wTqv6O8Q1ba-pu1aH8NaSZaXoqxIcULOa0

S5 - Pelagic Subecosystem

Southern Eastern Caribbean

Regional Fisheries Bodies' capacity to cooperate with and build capacity among member States to implement the EBM/EAF approach, will be facilitated through (among other things), the updated sub-regional FMP, National Action Plans (NAPs), data/information management and analysis capacity, and operationalization of national intersectoral coordination and consultation mechanisms (incl. science-policy interfaces). This includes through teh development an ddissemination of lesons leatrned, experience notes, a mini-documentary an dother communications products. This also through consultative processes that in and of themselves serve to build capacity

While the flyingfish subproject has endeavoured to do these things and has produced tehproducts outlined above, this ongoing process needs to be taken further in-country and by other regional and sub-regional entities.

available through CRFM Portal when updated

CLME+ Flyingfish Sub-Project

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnuf1Hi_r2RQyWwPRBI4ebrKjamySehZwhXZa7Q8UvB1Py4OeJXQEIc1xI_vbzKit-6M

5A.1 Strengthen the FAO-WECAFC and CRFM sub-regional arrangement for the assessment and management of the flyingfish fisheries including the establishment of a decision-making capacity for management

Engender stakeholder empowerment (with special attention to gender considerations), through increased awareness of fisheries and environmental issues and related impacts on livelihoods, human well-being, poverty alleviation, food security and other socio-economic as well as ecological consequences is necessary to facilitate their informed participation in the management process. Develop management framework in support of this empowerment

Video-documentary on flyig-fish fishery; policy briefs targeting stakeholders; communication strategy; infographics developed. 2 KAP studies done in support of awareness building and gauge levels of awareness; stakeholder consultations held to build awareness of, and also solicit input into, (updated/revised) sub-regional flying-fish management plan. Compilation of Lessons learned from the CLME+ Flying-fish sub-project has been prepared. Training materials related to the identified business opportunities, specifically the enhancement of fisher organizations and implementation dockside monitoring have been developed. Training manuals for Board Governance and Data Collection have also been developed to support ongoing enhancement of fisher’s organizations operations. Sub-regional Management plan has been updated as "Eastern Caribbean Flyingfish Fisheries Management Plan 2020-2025"

lCRFM portal will be updated shortly to include documenattion

CLME+ Flyingfish Sub-Project

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnue2lEaiDxdtbNRE2kTh7gT3X1u8asLTxcvM7siWwYALbtRFdM1zKloUicxeNtd0uwg

5A.5 Implement the CRFM/FAO-WECAFC Sub-Regional Management Plan for flyingfish fisheries in the Eastern Caribbean

As well, a comprehensive evaluation of FMP performance will be undertaken and based on the findings, along with other outputs of the Sub-Project, management strategies will be adapted to better achieve sustained fishery resource; optimal use of the fishery for long-term benefit; and, sustained ecosystem health). The Sub-regional FMP updated to capture the new information generated, new and adapted management strategies as well as proposals for medium/long-term sustainable financing mechanism(s)/plans. This updated Sub-regional FMP, having undergone the review process at various governance levels, will be presented for endorsement by the CRFM Ministerial Sub-Committee on Flyingfish and approved by the CRFM Ministerial Council.

An evaluation of FMP performance was completed and based on the findings, along with other outputs of the Sub-Project, management strategies were proposed to achieve sustained fishery resource; optimal use of the fishery for long-term benefit; and, sustained ecosystem health). These were incorporated into the Sub-regional Fisheries Management Plan (“Eastern Caribbean Flyingfish Management Plan 2020-2025”) which has been endorsed by Caribbean Fisheries Forum; and approved by Ministerial-Sub-committee on Flyingfish

CLME+ Flyingfish Sub-Project

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnud5ejx2iEeRufjFUQTwMDfHQQ7N7XeLaNZrDKO14pm_qBSGACNhwmTaHBL8BD-Yxfk

5A.4 Strengthen the FAO-WECAFC and CRFM capacity to develop, adopt and implement management and conservation measures for the flyingfish fisheries (full policy cycle implementation)

Identifying and prioritizing national level activities and available resources for implementation. Review existing national fisheries legislation and to provide recommendations and options for the way forward, including model legislation. Estimate existing fishing effort and fishing capacity. Recommendations for further development of national data collection systems in support of the EAF assessment and management of the eastern Caribbean Flyingfish fishery. Model national vessel licensing regulations formulated for adoption in accordance with legislation, and census of flyingfish vessels

A review of existing national fisheries legislation has been carried out and model legislation including model national vessel licensing regulations have been formulated. Estimate of existing fishing effort and fishing capacity developed. Recommendations for further development of national data collection systems in support of the EAF assessment and management of the eastern Caribbean Flying-fish fishery have been approved. Model national vessel licensing regulations for adoption in accordance with legislation, and census of flying-fish vessels have been approved by CRFM Ministerial sub-committee on flying-fish

CLME+ Flyingfish Sub-Project

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnudUAiLMXyOTi3iC2W0XQAPUhA8hsLsM5MJdsil2UsRgf19WEbs0q5wAHBiSZEr4WEo

5A.3 Operationalise and strengthen an integrated, sub-regional decision support system (DSS) for the flyingfish fisheries (in coordination with the large pelagics arrangements)

Improve stakeholder access to data and information of relevance to application of the EAF assessment and management of eastern Caribbean flying-fish and improved availability of data and information to the global community. Produce a multi-objective assessment of the eastern Caribbean flying-fish fisheries. Carry out a gender-sensitive valuation of the current and potential future contribution of flying-fish and associated pelagic fisheries to food security, income and employment and ecosystem goods and services, with recommendations for enhancement of the livelihoods and improvement of the conditions of work for fishers and processors. Monitoring and evaluation of management performance at the national and regional levels. Identification of key data and information requirements, associated sources of data and information and the mechanisms for data and information sharing at the regional, national, sectoral and local levels to inform development of a DSS. Delivery of a sub-regional data policy that will impose an obligation on the part of Member States to share data and information to improve the knowledge base for management decision-making in the EAF context.

Stakeholder access to data and information of relevance to application of the EAF assessment and management of eastern Caribbean flyingfish and improved availability of data and information to the global community Improved by development of an on-line bibliographic database and data repository housed on the CRFM website. a multi-objective assessment of the eastern Caribbean flyingfish fisheries has been produced. A gender-sensitive valuation of the current and potential future contribution of flyingfish and associated pelagic fisheries to food security, income and employment and ecosystem goods and services, with recommendations for enhancement of the livelihoods and improvement of the conditions of work for fishers and processors, has been carried out. Evaluation of management performance at the national level for four Member States and at the regional level; and impact assessment tool have been developed to allow continuous monitoring of management effectiveness. Key data and information requirements, associated sources of data and information and the mechanisms for data and information sharing at the regional, national, sectoral and local levels have been identified, to inform development of a decision support system (DSS). A model DSS has been approved by the Ministerial Sub-Committee on Flyingfish and a sample one has been customized for one Member State. A sub-regional data policy that imposes an obligation on the part of Member States to share data and information to improve the knowledge base for management decision-making, has been approved by the Ministerial Sub-Committee on Flyingfish.

CLME+ Flyingfish Sub-Project

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnue7Lc5hiFguR1LA6ABD0sdwYc9jpYJDlxzqF431wSDO4N_kxNzDmw6pzZi-EyuCXoU

5A.1 Strengthen the FAO-WECAFC and CRFM sub-regional arrangement for the assessment and management of the flyingfish fisheries including the establishment of a decision-making capacity for management

The CRFM Ministerial Sub-Committee on Flying-fish takes an active role in reviewing and evaluating new information generated under the project and during implementation of the flying-fish management plan, and the views and suggestions of the range of stakeholders at varying levels in the context of the EAF, so as to propose updated management recommendations for approval by the CRFM Ministerial Council. Engagement of the range of stakeholders in meaningful dialogue, exchange of data and information and active engagement in the management process. Meetings of any existing NICs, FACs and/or other entities performing similar roles facilitated to discuss the EAF, critical issues pertaining to flyingfish management and development of National Management Plans.

The CRFM Ministerial Sub-Committee on Flyingfish had an active role in reviewing the updated flyingfish fisheries management plan, which incorporated new information generated under the project and the views and suggestions of the range of stakeholders who were engaged in dialogue at varying levels in the development of updated management recommendations. This fisheries management plan is to be carried forward for approval by the CRFM Ministerial Council. While no NICs, FACs are operational, other entities performing similar roles were facilitated in discussion of the EAF, critical issues pertaining to flyingfish management and development of Management Plans. Data policy approved and Ministerial Council decreed that this should be used as the basic
policy to be adapted for other fisheries as/when necessary.. Online bibliographic database/data repository for information sharing is operational on CRFM website. Stock assessment of flyingfish has been updated

CLME+ Flyingfish Sub-Project

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnucsmROpW75s8Aa4BqE2L70dyLIAa1rPADi_KLbfy-s8QW1n86S12x3Tzn76KOhgPO0

S6 - Continental Shelf Subecosystem

6.1 Strengthen the FAO-WECAFC-CRFM sub-regional arrangement for the management of the shrimp and groundfish fisheries, and establish a decision-making capacity for policy formulation and management

The WECAFC is at present a Regional Fisheries Body (RFB) and its recommendations are not binding for Member States. The transformation into an Regional Fisheries Management Arrangement/Entity should allow for improved management of the shared living marine resources in its area of competence. This is a country driven process that requires discussions and negotiations which are likely to take some time

The discussions on the reorientation of WECAFC have been going on for some time, since the WECAFC 14th Session in 2012. Strategic Reorientation Workshops were held in 2014 and 2015. At the 16th WECAFC Session in 2016 the Commission agreed to launch a process to establish a RFMO. A first preparatory workshop was held 25-26 March 2019 in Barbados with the participation of 23 WECAFC members as well as international organizations including representatives from 2 RFMOs. The recommendations from the meeting were presented at the 17th WECAFC Session held 15-18 July in Miami, USA. A roadmap for the process was agreed upon, an intersessional WG was designated and a 2nd Preparatory meeting was scheduled to take place in the first half of 2020. However, due to COVID 19 pandemic the meeting has postponed and it is now expected to take place in the first quarter of 2021.

http://www.fao.org/fi/static-media/MeetingDocuments/WECAFC/WECAFC2019/17/default.htm

FAO CLME+ Subproject on shrimp and groundfish of the NBSLME and REBYC-II LAC Project

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnuf1CZtUiHznmIkwY8RvAsZfM7-o09QgOsf6SyCS8LD2l0-0ekdhZwCIHlwwy48hcG8

S6 - Continental Shelf Subecosystem

6.8 Establish and/or the capacity of Regional Fisheries Bodies to cooperate with and build capacity among member States to implement the EBM/EAF approach, through National Action Plans (NAPs), data/information management & analysis capacity, and operationalisation of national intersectoral coordination and consultation mechanisms (incl. science-policy interfaces)

The management of shared fisheries resources requires an effective institutional framework at the national, sub-regional and national levels. On the other hand, stakeholder participation is integral to the EAF approach as it enhances policy and regulation buy-in. Consultation mechanisms (NICs) are required within countries to operationalize stakeholder participation. Finally, countries must be in capacity to collect, safeguard and analyze data and information on the fisheries sector for management advice

Capacity for data processing and analysis has been enhanced in the region with participation of fisheries officers and scientists from Brazil, French Guiana, Guyana, Suriname and Trinidad and Tobago. Workshops in data preparation (23-25 October 2018) and stock assessment (8-12 July 2019), as well as training in fish stock assessment (21-25 January 2019 and 26-30 August 2019) have been delivered. On the other hand, the REBYC-IILAC and Shrimp and Groundfish project collaborated to to a regional training and training of trainers on EAF in Costa Rica in December 27, 2019. As a result of this, REBYC-II LAC and Shrimp and Groundfish subproject provided EAF training to stakeholders in Brazil (26-30 November 2019) and Guyana, Suriname and Trinidad and Tobago. A Letter of Agreement was signed with CERMES in early 2019 for developing National EAF implementation plans in Guyana, Suriname and Trinidad and Tobago, and the national EAF Plan for Brazil is being developed in collaboration with REBYC II LAC project. A diagnostic of NICs in Guyana, Suriname and Trinidad and Tobago was undertaken in July 2019 and recommendations are being developed

FAO CLME+ Subproject on shrimp and groundfish of the NBSLME and REBYC-II LAC

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnueD7QmQ5G4GUeC3EwIExHoiECkS3lF4i0qjP9rhZXkg_y9SBWHdGxDMGj1r2I47-2U

S3 - Regional Coordination

3.6 Develop and coordinate integrated and sectoral sustainable financing strategies for the cost-effective implementation of broader ocean governance in the region, with a short and medium term focus on sLMR governance

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

Cartagena Convention Area

How do we contribute to sustainable financing initiatives in the region,

Through projects like CReW and CReW+, focus has been on developing national and local innovative financing mechanisms for wastewater management in collaboration with development banks. The new CEP Strategy incorporates a resource mobilization strategy and a strategy for engagement of the private sector. The Investment Strategy developed under CLME+ offers further opportunities for coordinated investment in oceans governance. While several draft frameworks are being established, there is a need for operationalization.

ACP MEA, CLME+, IWEco, CReW and CReW+

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnufDVmA-x1LVaZX8RE9TCXKt-KdkGvBUK-XOoMeg4dkhBD-qgW2sUKbrw2tTL9O5Dzc

3.6 Develop and coordinate integrated and sectoral sustainable financing strategies for the cost-effective implementation of broader ocean governance in the region, with a short and medium term focus on sLMR governance

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

Cartagena Convention Area

How do we contribute to sustainable financing initiatives in the region,

Through projects like CReW and CReW+, focus has been on developing national and local innovative financing mechanisms for wastewater management in collaboration with development banks. The new CEP Strategy incorporates a resource mobilization strategy and a strategy for engagement of the private sector. The Investment Strategy developed under CLME+ offers further opportunities for coordinated investment in oceans governance. While several draft frameworks are being established, there is a need for operationalization.

ACP MEA, CLME+, IWEco, CReW and CReW+

S6 - Continental Shelf Subecosystem

6.2 Explore and establish a sub-regional arrangement to address both marine and land-based sources of pollution within the context of the expanded framework for the protection of the marine environment built under Strategy 1

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

As part of the EBM project development in Guyana, Trinidad and Tobago & Suriname, mechanisms are being developed to characterize pollution sources and types and magnitude of impacts. Efforts are ongoing to identify effective governance arrangements for the mitigation of pollution.

Assessments of pollution hotspots is were undertaken during implementation of EBM projects in Guyana and Trinidad and Tobago. The assessments include overall impacts on provision of ecosystem goods and services, trends and extent of pollution impacts and suitable pollution abatement measures. Further focus on sub regional mechanisms needed.

Smartsheet CLME+ Report

CLME+ EBM UNEP Sub-Project on Pollution and Marine Habitat in the NBSLME

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnucMpVbzyU4beVbhMIs-fD7WNCcja7WMnjDujLYLRtqMs9kyQymFdrWDos2NwFYdpRg

S6 - Continental Shelf Subecosystem

6.6 Operationalise and further enhance an interlinked, sub-regional decision support systems (DSS) for sustainable fisheries and environmental protection in the Guianas-Brazil continental shelf

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

Mechanism established in the participating countries of Suriname, Guyana and Trinidad to enable greater coordination on issues relating to marine habitat protection, pollution prevention and fisheries management and to have a mechanism for sharing of experiences between the three countries and also with Brazil.as it relates to national and/or sub-regional decision support systems.

The EBM sub-project contributed to improved integration of habitat and pollution issues into decision making processes concerning sustainable fisheries.The lessons learned from activities in Trinidad and Tobago, Suriname and Guyana need to be now used to facilitate upscaling and for input into data bases and information management systems. The sub regional reports for the NBSLME prepared for the Regional Nutrients Pollution Reduction Strategy will further aid in these efforts. Further enhancement of national systems are needed that will feed into sub regional and regional systems. Links to multiple agency and project efforts.

Smartsheet clme+ Report

CLME+ EBM UNEP Sub-Project on Pollution and Marine Habitat in the NBSLME

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnufpgtmGiK3rAXBBW7g6-_otERWJqxE2VyFscoWGpRkybsAyVce7C0xZDK5edR8I5EM

S6 - Continental Shelf Subecosystem

6.3 Explore and establish a sub-regional arrangement to address the issue of coastal habitat degradation and destruction within the context of the expanded framework for the protection of the marine environment built under Strategy 1

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

Ecosystem rehabilitation of degraded coastal mangroves and mangroves will be done in the three pilot countries (Guyana, Suriname, Trinidad & Tobago) through the application and testing of EBM mechanisms and proposed ocean governance arrangements.

EBM plans will be further developed for the assessed marine wetlands and mangroves based on pollution and habitat assessments in pilot countries. Broad-based stakeholder input is currently being sought with the farmers in Trinidad and Tobago, private and public sector partnerships. Collaborative efforts are ongoing with stakeholders incl. WWF Mangrove Dept. & EPA in Guyana. Work will continue to foster institutional arrangements needed for effective management of marine wetlands.

Smartsheet CLME+ Report

CLME+ EBM UNEP Sub-Project on Pollution and Marine Habitat in the NBSLME

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnudFZ4oQ6nOSWjf1FSBt2bmNjORFmASVLegmLOX1bvN9r--kAe4JmErcu3qX7RV3qeA

4.7 Strengthen the capacity of Regional Fisheries Bodies to engage and build capacity among member States to implement the EBM/EAF approach, through National Action Plans (NAPs), data/information management and analysis, and operationalisation of national intersectoral coordination and consultation mechanisms that include science-policy interfaces

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

Joint work with organizations at regional and sub-regional level to establish governance measures and work plans

It works together with OIRSA for the implementation of the traceability standard of fishery products

Ecolangosta+, ResCA Langosta

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnucFpH9TvVHfN4eVsa7Sz4v2NXxRs-I1sU0cTeYk7X0rc6fDMTmSKhRvtz_aiXBtUqs

4.7 Strengthen the capacity of Regional Fisheries Bodies to engage and build capacity among member States to implement the EBM/EAF approach, through National Action Plans (NAPs), data/information management and analysis, and operationalisation of national intersectoral coordination and consultation mechanisms that include science-policy interfaces

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

Joint work with organizations at regional and sub-regional level to establish governance measures and work plans

It works together with OIRSA for the implementation of the traceability standard of fishery products

Ecolangosta+, ResCA Langosta

4.6 Establish and/or enhance the institutional structure and capacity of (sub-)regional and national arrangements for implementing management and conservation measures for reef ecosystems

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

https://www.unenvironment.org/cep/ratification-map-cartagena-convention-and-oil-spills-protocol

Through the revitalization of GCRMN_ICRI, the Secretariat has been able to finalize a set of guidelines to enhance monitoring along with continued steps for improved training and capacity building

https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/partnership/?p=14306

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnuf0GP8M3LYxSLGs-ycBTKn79t2XoJBekNrzjCZ8uKGPNuly-DOhZAEh0V48msEpRMg

4.6 Establish and/or enhance the institutional structure and capacity of (sub-)regional and national arrangements for implementing management and conservation measures for reef ecosystems

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

https://www.unenvironment.org/cep/ratification-map-cartagena-convention-and-oil-spills-protocol

Through the revitalization of GCRMN_ICRI, the Secretariat has been able to finalize a set of guidelines to enhance monitoring along with continued steps for improved training and capacity building

https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/partnership/?p=14306

S3 - Regional Coordination

3.7 Facilitate the preparation of data and information products and the uptake of monitoring and research outputs by (sub)regional and national science-policy interfaces

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

To what extent is the work of the Cartagena Convention Secretariat including from projects and activities being packaged and effectively disseminated to inform better decision making and policy setting.

The Secretariat has a Communications, Education, Training and Awareness Programme and a series of ongoing activities to capture lessons learned and best practices from its projects and to compile these as Case Studies, Policy Briefs, Fact Sheets and Video Clips that are presented to high level decision making fora. The Secretariat has been able to have representation at regional and sub-regional Ministerial Meetings but there needs to be greater collaboration and coordination to ensure consistent messages to these fora from multiple agencies involved in coeans governance. Analysis and recommendations have also been provided for the development and sustainable use of national and/or regional data bases and information platforms as well as reporting indicators.

As required - ongoing process.

www.unenvironment.org/cep

IWEco, CReW+, CLME+, ACP MEA

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnuezF_IlNZd2LPyIXk4GCY1-vBdiDyiXA8IWv_maWrs4yueHdofPORFB8xhUMEgTRLU

3.7 Facilitate the preparation of data and information products and the uptake of monitoring and research outputs by (sub)regional and national science-policy interfaces

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

To what extent is the work of the Cartagena Convention Secretariat including from projects and activities being packaged and effectively disseminated to inform better decision making and policy setting.

The Secretariat has a Communications, Education, Training and Awareness Programme and a series of ongoing activities to capture lessons learned and best practices from its projects and to compile these as Case Studies, Policy Briefs, Fact Sheets and Video Clips that are presented to high level decision making fora. The Secretariat has been able to have representation at regional and sub-regional Ministerial Meetings but there needs to be greater collaboration and coordination to ensure consistent messages to these fora from multiple agencies involved in coeans governance. Analysis and recommendations have also been provided for the development and sustainable use of national and/or regional data bases and information platforms as well as reporting indicators.

As required - ongoing process.

www.unenvironment.org/cep

IWEco, CReW+, CLME+, ACP MEA

1.6 Enhance the capacity within and among arrangements to undertake and mainstream lessons learned and findings from monitoring, science and research in regional, sub-regional and national decision-making

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

This involves the documentation, synthesis and capture of information that can be compiled and better used in decision making processes at all levels. Such scientific information is generated from ongoing projects and activities of the Secretariat and directly informed the decision making process at the Convention Level. This however, takes place at multiple levels.

The Secretariat has made a concerted effort to better document the results of monitoring, science and research from our projects and activities into fact sheetsm infographics, case studies, policy briefs, technical papers, experience notes and lessons learned including through videos. This is a requirement particularly when such activities are implemented within the framework of a GEF funded project. While these are used directly to inform the decision-making process at the level of the Convention (Regional), there are many of regional and sub-regional decision making processes where the dissemination of these results are more challenging due mainly to lack of resources.

www.unenvironment.org/cep

IWEco, CReW+, ACP MEA, CLME+

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnucHzbVZo_SBJEK0V-W9-Yw43c7qBnuErpzS5c-yvsjfichxw2BqUM0oND2cyEgdzrE

1.6 Enhance the capacity within and among arrangements to undertake and mainstream lessons learned and findings from monitoring, science and research in regional, sub-regional and national decision-making

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

This involves the documentation, synthesis and capture of information that can be compiled and better used in decision making processes at all levels. Such scientific information is generated from ongoing projects and activities of the Secretariat and directly informed the decision making process at the Convention Level. This however, takes place at multiple levels.

The Secretariat has made a concerted effort to better document the results of monitoring, science and research from our projects and activities into fact sheetsm infographics, case studies, policy briefs, technical papers, experience notes and lessons learned including through videos. This is a requirement particularly when such activities are implemented within the framework of a GEF funded project. While these are used directly to inform the decision-making process at the level of the Convention (Regional), there are many of regional and sub-regional decision making processes where the dissemination of these results are more challenging due mainly to lack of resources.

www.unenvironment.org/cep

IWEco, CReW+, ACP MEA, CLME+

1.5 Establish and/or enhance the capacity of the regional, sub-regional and national governance arrangements for the involvement of civil society in the implementation of the EBM/EAF approach (IGOs, NGOs, CBOs, private sector...)

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

UNEP including the Cartagena Convention Secretariat has been promoting greater integration of the work of the pollution and marine biodiversity sub-programmes including through the use of EBM Approaches, Marine Spatial Planning and Integrated watershed and coastal zone management. This speaks to our targeted efforts to include civil society.

Full engagement and involvement of civil society is a critical part of the work of UNEP and the Cartagena Convention Secretariat. External and Donor funded projects by the GEF and the EU require consultation and support of civil society in their development and implementation as well as in their Governance Mechanisms for example Steering Ctee Meetings. It is difficult to make an overall assessment as the level of civil society engagement is very variable country to country and even for specific projects. As a Secretariat, we have directly partnered with various civil society organization e.g. CANARI and CYEN who have supported our projects and activities.

Ongoing process - as required.

www.unenvironment.org/cep

IWEco, CLME+, CReW+, ACP MEA

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnucoe1vkTAlAJRMVWG34d0EC3UvgPgZgFe6nwvO_-GWt_yu4Ra-WSLcPWdUviK6t-nM

1.5 Establish and/or enhance the capacity of the regional, sub-regional and national governance arrangements for the involvement of civil society in the implementation of the EBM/EAF approach (IGOs, NGOs, CBOs, private sector...)

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

UNEP including the Cartagena Convention Secretariat has been promoting greater integration of the work of the pollution and marine biodiversity sub-programmes including through the use of EBM Approaches, Marine Spatial Planning and Integrated watershed and coastal zone management. This speaks to our targeted efforts to include civil society.

Full engagement and involvement of civil society is a critical part of the work of UNEP and the Cartagena Convention Secretariat. External and Donor funded projects by the GEF and the EU require consultation and support of civil society in their development and implementation as well as in their Governance Mechanisms for example Steering Ctee Meetings. It is difficult to make an overall assessment as the level of civil society engagement is very variable country to country and even for specific projects. As a Secretariat, we have directly partnered with various civil society organization e.g. CANARI and CYEN who have supported our projects and activities.

Ongoing process - as required.

www.unenvironment.org/cep

IWEco, CLME+, CReW+, ACP MEA

1.9 Strengthen the capacity of the regional and sub-regional arrangements to support countries in becoming parties to relevant international and regional agreements and complying with their global and regional commitments towards the conservation of the marine environment (including the support to update and harmonize national legislation and regulations)

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

As a legally binding regional agreement for the protection and sustainable use of the Caribbean Sea, this is a core mandate and responsibility of the Secretariat. In that context, all of the progrqammes, projects and activities that are developed and implemented through the Secretariat directly support this SAP Action.

One of the core mandates of the Secretariat is to promote ratification and effective implementation of the Cartagena Convention and its Protocols as well as related MEAs, regional and global commitments on marine biodiversity and marine pollution. There has been an increased ratification of the Convention (only two countries are not parties - Suriname and Haiti) as well as for the Protocols. National Country Reports reflect greater efforts to implement the provisions of the Convention and the Protocol as well as related sub-regional, regional and global commitments.

Ongoing Process - as required.

www.unevironment.org/cep

IWEco, CReW+, CLME+, ACP MEA

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnueMPL7PkE2OifCdpwfnE9gflnhoKCgAgL6aFY5lbIqDy2Ld5aZPiu5CU9N0qtUgN0c

1.9 Strengthen the capacity of the regional and sub-regional arrangements to support countries in becoming parties to relevant international and regional agreements and complying with their global and regional commitments towards the conservation of the marine environment (including the support to update and harmonize national legislation and regulations)

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

As a legally binding regional agreement for the protection and sustainable use of the Caribbean Sea, this is a core mandate and responsibility of the Secretariat. In that context, all of the progrqammes, projects and activities that are developed and implemented through the Secretariat directly support this SAP Action.

One of the core mandates of the Secretariat is to promote ratification and effective implementation of the Cartagena Convention and its Protocols as well as related MEAs, regional and global commitments on marine biodiversity and marine pollution. There has been an increased ratification of the Convention (only two countries are not parties - Suriname and Haiti) as well as for the Protocols. National Country Reports reflect greater efforts to implement the provisions of the Convention and the Protocol as well as related sub-regional, regional and global commitments.

Ongoing Process - as required.

www.unevironment.org/cep

IWEco, CReW+, CLME+, ACP MEA

1.11 Establish and/or enhance the capacity of the regional, sub –regional and national governance arrangements for the monitoring, assessment and reporting on the state of the marine environment.

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

Supporting countries and partner organizations at all levels to enhance monitoring, assessment and reporting specifically on Marine Biodiversity and Marine Pollution. This could take the form of the development and implementation of national monitoring programmes, enhancing the capacity of institutions at national and regional level for monitoring and assessment and to support reporting to the Cartagena Convention and other relevant MEAs and reporting frameworks.

In the development of reports such as CEP Technical Report 33, 52 and more recently with the development of the State of Marine Pollution Report and Marine Habitat Report, many countries remained challenge to provide quality and timely data and information. With the support of RACs and specialized agencies who form part of the RAC and through multiple projects, the Secretariat has provided technical support to design national monitoring and assessment programmes, in the development of national and regional data bases and information management platforms, in the development of harmonized methodologies for monitoring and assessment and identification of parameters for inclusion in future monitoring programmes including consideration of indicators and targets.

As requeired. This is an ongoing process.

www.unevironment.org/cep

IWEco, CLME+, ACP MEA, CReW+

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnuf60i8FJfily8t7mm6PG7nSRcwXEa_Df6wOanNJgC76nRu5vSpnRogjAKRcIOF30HE

1.11 Establish and/or enhance the capacity of the regional, sub –regional and national governance arrangements for the monitoring, assessment and reporting on the state of the marine environment.

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

Supporting countries and partner organizations at all levels to enhance monitoring, assessment and reporting specifically on Marine Biodiversity and Marine Pollution. This could take the form of the development and implementation of national monitoring programmes, enhancing the capacity of institutions at national and regional level for monitoring and assessment and to support reporting to the Cartagena Convention and other relevant MEAs and reporting frameworks.

In the development of reports such as CEP Technical Report 33, 52 and more recently with the development of the State of Marine Pollution Report and Marine Habitat Report, many countries remained challenge to provide quality and timely data and information. With the support of RACs and specialized agencies who form part of the RAC and through multiple projects, the Secretariat has provided technical support to design national monitoring and assessment programmes, in the development of national and regional data bases and information management platforms, in the development of harmonized methodologies for monitoring and assessment and identification of parameters for inclusion in future monitoring programmes including consideration of indicators and targets.

As requeired. This is an ongoing process.

www.unevironment.org/cep

IWEco, CLME+, ACP MEA, CReW+

1.4 Enhance the compliance and enforcement capacity of the regional, sub-regional and national governance arrangements

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

Supporting Governments within the legal scope of the Cartagena Convention Secretariat to comply with their obligations under the Convention and the Protocols as well as related regional and global commitments including the SDGs.

Most of the projects and activities support Contracting Parties in enhancing the institutional, policy, institutional and legal frameworks in order to comply with specific national obligations for the Convention, its Protocols and related MEAs. These form an integral part of all of the projects developed by the Secretariat including those funding by the GEF and is an ongoing process. This includes through institutionalized, formal, informal and online training, development of tool boxes, development of model legislation and regulations, as well as laboratory and field exercises. This is an ongoing process and reflected either in the achievement of project targets or in national country reports provided by Contracting Parties to the Secretariat every two years.

Ongoing Process - as Required.

www.unenvironment.org/cep

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnucbV63A8t51EIoFhvM9yKxR0W_IOSVZ6wruCGe542AXWmS3gXHKgMKciYyb2tq4s6Y

1.4 Enhance the compliance and enforcement capacity of the regional, sub-regional and national governance arrangements

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

Supporting Governments within the legal scope of the Cartagena Convention Secretariat to comply with their obligations under the Convention and the Protocols as well as related regional and global commitments including the SDGs.

Most of the projects and activities support Contracting Parties in enhancing the institutional, policy, institutional and legal frameworks in order to comply with specific national obligations for the Convention, its Protocols and related MEAs. These form an integral part of all of the projects developed by the Secretariat including those funding by the GEF and is an ongoing process. This includes through institutionalized, formal, informal and online training, development of tool boxes, development of model legislation and regulations, as well as laboratory and field exercises. This is an ongoing process and reflected either in the achievement of project targets or in national country reports provided by Contracting Parties to the Secretariat every two years.

Ongoing Process - as Required.

www.unenvironment.org/cep

1.3 Evaluate expansion and strengthening of the mandate of organizations to effectively address issues relating to habitat degradation and pollution in the marine environment

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

The mandate of the Cartagena Convention and its Protocols focus substantially on the two thematic areas of marine biodiversity and pollution. In this regard, our role is to raise this issue among partner agencies in particular high level Ministerial and Decision-Making fora so that these issues are a high priority item.

The Secretariat is working to have other IGOs and Regional NGOs recognize the importance of addressing habitat degradation and pollution reduction and control through a variety of mechanisms including: (1) Knowledge Management Products - Development of State of Convention Area Report on Pollution and Marine Habitat including associated Regional Habitat and Nutrients Pollution Reduction Strategies; (2) Design and implementation of national projects focusing on habitats and pollution including integrated Ecosystem Based Management Approaches; (3) Webinars and presentations at high level Ministerial Fora including Meetings of Ministers with responsibility for Water, Solid Waste and the LAC Ministerial Fora; (4) Partnerships with other organizations that may not have had habitat restoration and pollution as a high priority activity. In that regard, several agencies including TNC, IUCN, among others are now focusing on wastewater and plastics pollution, UNECLAC is working on reporting on SDG 6 and integrated water and wastewater management and many other organizations are considering how to add the issue of pollution and habitat to the core agenda especially the Fisheries bodies such as FAO, CRFM, OSPESCA, WECAFC

As required - this is an ongoing process.

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnuc-AO5cv2GLzAGfx_twd8OUoMX9WVpNRC7UfSNBsBRTPMBpFyk1xpv8do0mp_bBCA4

1.3 Evaluate expansion and strengthening of the mandate of organizations to effectively address issues relating to habitat degradation and pollution in the marine environment

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

The mandate of the Cartagena Convention and its Protocols focus substantially on the two thematic areas of marine biodiversity and pollution. In this regard, our role is to raise this issue among partner agencies in particular high level Ministerial and Decision-Making fora so that these issues are a high priority item.

The Secretariat is working to have other IGOs and Regional NGOs recognize the importance of addressing habitat degradation and pollution reduction and control through a variety of mechanisms including: (1) Knowledge Management Products - Development of State of Convention Area Report on Pollution and Marine Habitat including associated Regional Habitat and Nutrients Pollution Reduction Strategies; (2) Design and implementation of national projects focusing on habitats and pollution including integrated Ecosystem Based Management Approaches; (3) Webinars and presentations at high level Ministerial Fora including Meetings of Ministers with responsibility for Water, Solid Waste and the LAC Ministerial Fora; (4) Partnerships with other organizations that may not have had habitat restoration and pollution as a high priority activity. In that regard, several agencies including TNC, IUCN, among others are now focusing on wastewater and plastics pollution, UNECLAC is working on reporting on SDG 6 and integrated water and wastewater management and many other organizations are considering how to add the issue of pollution and habitat to the core agenda especially the Fisheries bodies such as FAO, CRFM, OSPESCA, WECAFC

As required - this is an ongoing process.

1.2 Establish and strengthen regional institutional coordination and cooperation arrangements

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

The development and implementation of the biennial work plan and budget of the Cartagena Convention Secretariat requires partnerships at both a strategic level and through collaboration which supports the execution of projects and activities. These are reflected in Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs), Project Cooperation Agreements (PCAs), and other contractual agreements (SSFAs)

The Secretariat has formalized Host Agreements with the Government of France, Curacao and Trinidad and Tobago for hosting of Regional Activity Centres to the Convention. A host agreement with the Government of Cuba is being finalized. An agreement was made with the Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute (GCFI) to co0-host the Regional Caribbean Marine Litter Node. Other formal MOUs have been finalized with several regional and extra regional institutions including the OSPAR Commission, GCFI, CATHALAC, INVERMAR, Ocean Foundation and being reviewed for CARIBMEPA and CARPHA. Cooperation is ongoing with Global MEAs in particular as a member of the Plastics Working Group of the BASEL Convention and in support of the Convention on Biological Biodiversity, RAMSAR and CITES. RAC REMPEITC, the Regional Activity Centre for Oil Spills facilitates cooperation with the IMO and all the maritime conventions in particular MARPOL, London and Ballast Water. Direct partnership with a number of regional agencies to facilitate project implementation including CARICOM/CARPHA, OECS, CANARI, CWWA, CAWASA, NOAA, GCFI, IUCN, TNC, IDB, World Bank, CDB and in the production of joint reports.

When additional partnerships are developed.

Core work of the Secretariat as well as projects s such as CLME+, CReW+, IWEco and ACP MEA

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnuf24XTlxTcjSTUa27gJ_Pux4GsWypzTzvvJx7SYOraECTH5dRktkzQeptaeq40tfAo

1.2 Establish and strengthen regional institutional coordination and cooperation arrangements

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

The development and implementation of the biennial work plan and budget of the Cartagena Convention Secretariat requires partnerships at both a strategic level and through collaboration which supports the execution of projects and activities. These are reflected in Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs), Project Cooperation Agreements (PCAs), and other contractual agreements (SSFAs)

The Secretariat has formalized Host Agreements with the Government of France, Curacao and Trinidad and Tobago for hosting of Regional Activity Centres to the Convention. A host agreement with the Government of Cuba is being finalized. An agreement was made with the Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute (GCFI) to co0-host the Regional Caribbean Marine Litter Node. Other formal MOUs have been finalized with several regional and extra regional institutions including the OSPAR Commission, GCFI, CATHALAC, INVERMAR, Ocean Foundation and being reviewed for CARIBMEPA and CARPHA. Cooperation is ongoing with Global MEAs in particular as a member of the Plastics Working Group of the BASEL Convention and in support of the Convention on Biological Biodiversity, RAMSAR and CITES. RAC REMPEITC, the Regional Activity Centre for Oil Spills facilitates cooperation with the IMO and all the maritime conventions in particular MARPOL, London and Ballast Water. Direct partnership with a number of regional agencies to facilitate project implementation including CARICOM/CARPHA, OECS, CANARI, CWWA, CAWASA, NOAA, GCFI, IUCN, TNC, IDB, World Bank, CDB and in the production of joint reports.

When additional partnerships are developed.

Core work of the Secretariat as well as projects s such as CLME+, CReW+, IWEco and ACP MEA

1.11 Establish and/or enhance the capacity of the regional, sub –regional and national governance arrangements for the monitoring, assessment and reporting on the state of the marine environment.

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

Countries of the Wider Caribbean (Secretariat Convention Area)

Provision of capacity building support directly from the Secretariat or through its networks of Regional Activity Centers, Regional Nodes, Platforms and Partnerships that have been established under specific programs and/or projects to improve national capacity for data collection, storage, analysis, interpretation and dissemination including development of specific information products to guide more informed decision making on marine pollution and marine biodiversity issues. This includes enhancement of national and/or regional monitoring and assessment programmes, development of harmonized monitoring methodology, identification of emerging issues, greater engagement with the research and academic community and greater use of citizen science.

The Cartagena Convention Secretariat has developed several reports relating to marine biodiversity and pollution. With support of the CLME+, IWEco, CReW and other project interventions, more comprehensive State of Marine Pollution and State of Marine Habitat reports were developed for the first time. At the same time, projects have been designed to build national capacity for monitoring and assessment including the development of methodologies, guidelines and providing technical and capacity building support for the development and implementation of national monitoring programs. Harmonized Methodology for Marine Litter monitoring was developed and recommendations for monitoring parameters. Several countries still lack national capacity for monitoring and assessment and the use of scientific data to inform policy and decision-making processes. The findings from the GCFI Research Agenda developed from CLME+ Project and the recommendations from the State of Reports need to be implemented.

Core Mandate, CLME+, IWEco, CReW, CReW+, ACP MEA

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnudxhbv6NPF3decaZDMzfgePIuhEsVGCCLXF9W--tBO6SwP4dWKUOhPxmA0tQCUrPg0

1.11 Establish and/or enhance the capacity of the regional, sub –regional and national governance arrangements for the monitoring, assessment and reporting on the state of the marine environment.

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

Countries of the Wider Caribbean (Secretariat Convention Area)

Provision of capacity building support directly from the Secretariat or through its networks of Regional Activity Centers, Regional Nodes, Platforms and Partnerships that have been established under specific programs and/or projects to improve national capacity for data collection, storage, analysis, interpretation and dissemination including development of specific information products to guide more informed decision making on marine pollution and marine biodiversity issues. This includes enhancement of national and/or regional monitoring and assessment programmes, development of harmonized monitoring methodology, identification of emerging issues, greater engagement with the research and academic community and greater use of citizen science.

The Cartagena Convention Secretariat has developed several reports relating to marine biodiversity and pollution. With support of the CLME+, IWEco, CReW and other project interventions, more comprehensive State of Marine Pollution and State of Marine Habitat reports were developed for the first time. At the same time, projects have been designed to build national capacity for monitoring and assessment including the development of methodologies, guidelines and providing technical and capacity building support for the development and implementation of national monitoring programs. Harmonized Methodology for Marine Litter monitoring was developed and recommendations for monitoring parameters. Several countries still lack national capacity for monitoring and assessment and the use of scientific data to inform policy and decision-making processes. The findings from the GCFI Research Agenda developed from CLME+ Project and the recommendations from the State of Reports need to be implemented.

Core Mandate, CLME+, IWEco, CReW, CReW+, ACP MEA

1.4 Enhance the compliance and enforcement capacity of the regional, sub-regional and national governance arrangements

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

Countries of the Wider Caribbean (Secretariat Convention Area)

Develop and implement programs and projects with dedicated capacity building activities for strengthening the compliance/enforcement capacity of national governments relating to marine protected areas, species and land-based sources of pollution. This includes informing the design of other bilateral or multilateral programs, projects and activities by donors to ensure that such capacity building is considered.

In the design of new programmes, projects and activities as well as new internal and thematic strategies for the Secretariat, greater focus has been on strengthening governance mechanisms for enforcement. This has focussed on thematic issues such as wastewater, water resources management, marine protected areas, and solid waste and plastics management. Emphasis in the past has been also on developing model laws and guidelines. Future projects are taken a more integrated approach as far as enforcement and to provide specific support for updating national legislation and regulations as well as enforcement capacity.

IWEco, CReW+, ACP MEA, Government of Germany/Plastics

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnufZP97DyYwI0igkY-YeJqhT339isNfZiQATeFgUKeq8k5PqdyO1cr3s_igh9JoFinM

1.4 Enhance the compliance and enforcement capacity of the regional, sub-regional and national governance arrangements

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

Countries of the Wider Caribbean (Secretariat Convention Area)

Develop and implement programs and projects with dedicated capacity building activities for strengthening the compliance/enforcement capacity of national governments relating to marine protected areas, species and land-based sources of pollution. This includes informing the design of other bilateral or multilateral programs, projects and activities by donors to ensure that such capacity building is considered.

In the design of new programmes, projects and activities as well as new internal and thematic strategies for the Secretariat, greater focus has been on strengthening governance mechanisms for enforcement. This has focussed on thematic issues such as wastewater, water resources management, marine protected areas, and solid waste and plastics management. Emphasis in the past has been also on developing model laws and guidelines. Future projects are taken a more integrated approach as far as enforcement and to provide specific support for updating national legislation and regulations as well as enforcement capacity.

IWEco, CReW+, ACP MEA, Government of Germany/Plastics

1.10 Establish and/or enhance the data and information quality and collection and management capacity of the regional, sub-regional and national governance arrangements for the protection of the marine environment, including through the establishment of public-private partnerships

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

Countries of the Wider Caribbean (Secretariat Convention Area)

Support to national, sub-regional, and regional frameworks that provide relevant reports such as on SDGs, MEAs and other regional and global reports requiring compilation and assessment of information relevant to the protection of the marine environment.

This is an ongoing process in collaboration with several regional and sub-regional agencies and projects to enhance quality of environmental data and identification of appropriate indicators. Through projects such as CLME+, IWEco, CReW, CReW+ and in collaboration with UNEP Regional office, efforts continue with environment and statistical departments to enhance State of Environment Reports and other regional GEO Reports either on thematic issues of specific to a region. Much work needs to be done in the area of public-private partnerships. In 2021, the Secretariat through the IWEco project conduced an assessment of relevant indicators as well as data bases and platforms. Efforts are also ongoing to enhance national, sub-regional and regional databases and information platforms that will facilitate improved reporting particularly for SDGs 6 and 14.

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnudIUdRG4xf4XaQIPeBI8sTwtU_hnqs9l5Rv4CxaOQwNznXs2_THPdjvn3KxwFUYbXA

1.10 Establish and/or enhance the data and information quality and collection and management capacity of the regional, sub-regional and national governance arrangements for the protection of the marine environment, including through the establishment of public-private partnerships

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

Countries of the Wider Caribbean (Secretariat Convention Area)

Support to national, sub-regional, and regional frameworks that provide relevant reports such as on SDGs, MEAs and other regional and global reports requiring compilation and assessment of information relevant to the protection of the marine environment.

This is an ongoing process in collaboration with several regional and sub-regional agencies and projects to enhance quality of environmental data and identification of appropriate indicators. Through projects such as CLME+, IWEco, CReW, CReW+ and in collaboration with UNEP Regional office, efforts continue with environment and statistical departments to enhance State of Environment Reports and other regional GEO Reports either on thematic issues of specific to a region. Much work needs to be done in the area of public-private partnerships. In 2021, the Secretariat through the IWEco project conduced an assessment of relevant indicators as well as data bases and platforms. Efforts are also ongoing to enhance national, sub-regional and regional databases and information platforms that will facilitate improved reporting particularly for SDGs 6 and 14.

1.9 Strengthen the capacity of the regional and sub-regional arrangements to support countries in becoming parties to relevant international and regional agreements and complying with their global and regional commitments towards the conservation of the marine environment (including the support to update and harmonize national legislation and regulations)

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

Countries of the Wider Caribbean (Secretariat Convention Area)

There are several regional and global MEAs administered by IMO and UNEP concerning marine biodiversity protection and the control, reduction and prevention of pollution from land and marine-based sources. The Cartagena Convention and its Protocols both complement and directly support these Global MEAs. Capacity building support would be either directly to countries through projects, technical and high level political missions and facilitating national consultations for ratification of these agreements. Providing informing of the importance of such MEAs to existing regional and sub-regional IGOs would also support country ratification. Associated with ratification would be support provided to countries to comply with their new obligations through institutional, policy, legislative and regulatory reforms. This would involve targeted capacity building workshops at multiple scales and for different target audiences depending on the specific MEA and obligation. Several projects executed or co-executed by the Secretariat provide direct support for this for participating countries.

The Cartagena Convention Secretariat continues to build capacity of countries through financial and technical support from projects addressing the transboundary issue of habitat degradation and community restoration as well as pollution control, prevention and reduction. MOUs have been signed with Global MEAs, knowledge management products have been developed about the benefits of ratification and several national, sub-regional and regional capacity building workshops and webinars conducted.

IWEco, CReW+, ACP MEA Core Mandate with focus on Pollution and Marine Biodiversity related MEAs

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnufzpiHwTpn6As432-CEL_qPCqGMJydUKc-2mNUZUXiy4aF5zfV5yq27UKjG0sn7bqU

1.9 Strengthen the capacity of the regional and sub-regional arrangements to support countries in becoming parties to relevant international and regional agreements and complying with their global and regional commitments towards the conservation of the marine environment (including the support to update and harmonize national legislation and regulations)

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

Countries of the Wider Caribbean (Secretariat Convention Area)

There are several regional and global MEAs administered by IMO and UNEP concerning marine biodiversity protection and the control, reduction and prevention of pollution from land and marine-based sources. The Cartagena Convention and its Protocols both complement and directly support these Global MEAs. Capacity building support would be either directly to countries through projects, technical and high level political missions and facilitating national consultations for ratification of these agreements. Providing informing of the importance of such MEAs to existing regional and sub-regional IGOs would also support country ratification. Associated with ratification would be support provided to countries to comply with their new obligations through institutional, policy, legislative and regulatory reforms. This would involve targeted capacity building workshops at multiple scales and for different target audiences depending on the specific MEA and obligation. Several projects executed or co-executed by the Secretariat provide direct support for this for participating countries.

The Cartagena Convention Secretariat continues to build capacity of countries through financial and technical support from projects addressing the transboundary issue of habitat degradation and community restoration as well as pollution control, prevention and reduction. MOUs have been signed with Global MEAs, knowledge management products have been developed about the benefits of ratification and several national, sub-regional and regional capacity building workshops and webinars conducted.

IWEco, CReW+, ACP MEA Core Mandate with focus on Pollution and Marine Biodiversity related MEAs

1.8 Establish and/or increase the capacity of (sub-)regional organizations and countries for integrating the management of terrestrial drainage basins with the management of the marine recipient basins and coastal development (CLME and NBSLME)

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

Countries of the Wider Caribbean (Secretariat Convention Area)

Promote through targeted training and capacity building concepts such as "Ridge to Reef", "Integrated Watershed and Coastal Zone Management", "Source to Sea" , "Ecosystem Based Management" and "Marine Spatial Planning" and "Integrated Land Use Management". This is well understood within a SIDS context and efforts may focus more on continental countries as far as promotion of the concept.

This has been the core focus of multiple GEF and other projects particularly in SIDS. While the concept is well understood and appreciated in SIDS, more work is needed in continental countries and in the establishment and operationalization of transboundary commissions. More integration is needed between Land Use Planning, Marine Spatial Planning and Ecosystem Based Management approaches. The development of the Regional Nutrients Pollution Reduction Strategy and integration of Freshwater Resources Management into the Cartagena Convention will facilitate greater integrated approaches.

IWECO, ACP MEA, CReW+, CLME+

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnueq7fVTnqrFJCP-yzOh6JyPIP3JgRGb4gURF5rN9qxcaHFU641Qnpd8sc9sdLflcro

1.8 Establish and/or increase the capacity of (sub-)regional organizations and countries for integrating the management of terrestrial drainage basins with the management of the marine recipient basins and coastal development (CLME and NBSLME)

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

Countries of the Wider Caribbean (Secretariat Convention Area)

Promote through targeted training and capacity building concepts such as "Ridge to Reef", "Integrated Watershed and Coastal Zone Management", "Source to Sea" , "Ecosystem Based Management" and "Marine Spatial Planning" and "Integrated Land Use Management". This is well understood within a SIDS context and efforts may focus more on continental countries as far as promotion of the concept.

This has been the core focus of multiple GEF and other projects particularly in SIDS. While the concept is well understood and appreciated in SIDS, more work is needed in continental countries and in the establishment and operationalization of transboundary commissions. More integration is needed between Land Use Planning, Marine Spatial Planning and Ecosystem Based Management approaches. The development of the Regional Nutrients Pollution Reduction Strategy and integration of Freshwater Resources Management into the Cartagena Convention will facilitate greater integrated approaches.

IWECO, ACP MEA, CReW+, CLME+

1.7 Establish and/or enhance the capacity within and among arrangements to undertake and mainstream valuation of ecosystem goods and services in regional, sub-regional and national decision-making and policy development

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

Countries of the Wider Caribbean (Secretariat Convention Area)

Facilitate training and capacity building in valuation of ecosystem goods and services at local, national, sub-regional and regional levels (as part of ongoing or planned programmes, projects and activities) and to encourage the use of such data and information for more informed decision-making and policy development. This could be through guidelines, tool boxes and incorporation into decision-making processes.

The Cartagena Convention Secretariat through the GEF CReW project conducted resource valuation in Trinidad and Tobago and Panama regarding the connections between wastewater treatment, human and ecosystem health. Further effort is ongoing to enhance capacity within the Wider Caribbean region for utilize the economic valuation approach. This was most recently facilitated through a Virtual webinar under the GEF IWEco Project and training during their 2020 Project Steering Committee. New projects under development continue to promote training and use of economic valuation methods.

http://gefcrew.org/images/media

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnudo8AlwTER3ikDyP_1UHlqTuKBKHIHpGL4ZJCSpNMXBaOl1e8hQVGRXWVtrVi69de0

1.7 Establish and/or enhance the capacity within and among arrangements to undertake and mainstream valuation of ecosystem goods and services in regional, sub-regional and national decision-making and policy development

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

Countries of the Wider Caribbean (Secretariat Convention Area)

Facilitate training and capacity building in valuation of ecosystem goods and services at local, national, sub-regional and regional levels (as part of ongoing or planned programmes, projects and activities) and to encourage the use of such data and information for more informed decision-making and policy development. This could be through guidelines, tool boxes and incorporation into decision-making processes.

The Cartagena Convention Secretariat through the GEF CReW project conducted resource valuation in Trinidad and Tobago and Panama regarding the connections between wastewater treatment, human and ecosystem health. Further effort is ongoing to enhance capacity within the Wider Caribbean region for utilize the economic valuation approach. This was most recently facilitated through a Virtual webinar under the GEF IWEco Project and training during their 2020 Project Steering Committee. New projects under development continue to promote training and use of economic valuation methods.

http://gefcrew.org/images/media

1.6 Enhance the capacity within and among arrangements to undertake and mainstream lessons learned and findings from monitoring, science and research in regional, sub-regional and national decision-making

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

Countries of the Wider Caribbean (Secretariat Convention Area)

Ensure documentation of case studies and lessons learned from monitoring, science and research activities coordinated by the Secretariat and promote the dissemination of these results to inform more science-based decision making and policy formulation processes at national, sub-regional and regional levels.

The Secretariat has documented case studies from past and ongoing GEF Projects such as IWCAM, REPCar, CReW, IWCAM, CLME, CLME+, IWEco and CReW+ as well as experiences in the development of reports such as CEP TR 33 and 52 to document experiences from monitoring and assessment. Several fact sheets and policy briefs have been developed from the State of Marine Pollution and State of Marine Habitat Reports as well as the Regional Nutrients Pollution Reduction Strategy, Regional Habitat Restoration Strategy and their associated Action Plans. Presentations are made to regularly regional technical fora such as CWWA, GCFI, Ministerial Fora at the regional and sub-regional levels and through Technical Meetings and Conferences of Parties of the Cartagena Convention. Several policy guidelines, tool boxes, case studies, experience notes and lessons learned documents have been produced with support of IW Learn and others. Future focus needs to be on the actual use of these tools in policy setting and decision making. Specific focus has been on sargassum, plastics and wastewater management including compendium of best practices for plastics management in the tourism sector.

www.unenvironment.cep/org

CLME+, IWEco, CReW+, ACP MEA

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnucrEv9RAElsyVNh7PEP19Z2-XZrNAPS7kc0BZg1SEw-0lN5rdVSimAEpgoUrl80W7Q

1.6 Enhance the capacity within and among arrangements to undertake and mainstream lessons learned and findings from monitoring, science and research in regional, sub-regional and national decision-making

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

Countries of the Wider Caribbean (Secretariat Convention Area)

Ensure documentation of case studies and lessons learned from monitoring, science and research activities coordinated by the Secretariat and promote the dissemination of these results to inform more science-based decision making and policy formulation processes at national, sub-regional and regional levels.

The Secretariat has documented case studies from past and ongoing GEF Projects such as IWCAM, REPCar, CReW, IWCAM, CLME, CLME+, IWEco and CReW+ as well as experiences in the development of reports such as CEP TR 33 and 52 to document experiences from monitoring and assessment. Several fact sheets and policy briefs have been developed from the State of Marine Pollution and State of Marine Habitat Reports as well as the Regional Nutrients Pollution Reduction Strategy, Regional Habitat Restoration Strategy and their associated Action Plans. Presentations are made to regularly regional technical fora such as CWWA, GCFI, Ministerial Fora at the regional and sub-regional levels and through Technical Meetings and Conferences of Parties of the Cartagena Convention. Several policy guidelines, tool boxes, case studies, experience notes and lessons learned documents have been produced with support of IW Learn and others. Future focus needs to be on the actual use of these tools in policy setting and decision making. Specific focus has been on sargassum, plastics and wastewater management including compendium of best practices for plastics management in the tourism sector.

www.unenvironment.cep/org

CLME+, IWEco, CReW+, ACP MEA

1.5 Establish and/or enhance the capacity of the regional, sub-regional and national governance arrangements for the involvement of civil society in the implementation of the EBM/EAF approach (IGOs, NGOs, CBOs, private sector...)

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

Countries of the Wider Caribbean (Secretariat Convention Area)

Promoting greater engagement of civil society in existing governance arrangement of the Secretariat including encouraging participation at meetings of the STACs, COPs, IGM, promote participation as members of Project Steering Ctees, National Project Intersectoral Committees and other relevant project committees and working groups implemented/executed through UNEP CEP. This also includes direct engagement of NGOs/CBOs to support implementation of EBM related programmes, projects and activities.

For programmes, projects and activities e.g. In the development of UNEP CLME+ EBM sub-project and its ongoing implementation, civil society groups in Trinidad and Tobago, Suriname and Guyana have been actively engaged. Efforts are ongoing to ensure greater participation and representation of civil society in Secretariat organized meetings and to ensure that any material developed is effectively disseminated. EBM approaches to habitat degradation and pollution prevention are relatively new and more work is required at all levels to more effectively engage private sector and civil society in integrated planning processes. The new Strategy for the Secretariat promotes this integrated approach through tools such as Nature Based solutions, Marine Spatial Planning and Circular Economy. A new Strategic objective of the Secretariat on Ocean-Based or Blue Economies offers further opportunities for both EBM approaches and civil society and private sector involvement as well as the new Investment Plan developed under the CLME+ project.

CLME+, IWEco, CLME+, ACP MEA, Core Mandate

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnufF8YDblFYhCDElsUx5ed0ZxZ8YWQ1ZPeJJCGLWaqQvjs-w75CXjsBEVb-BO30TjaU

1.5 Establish and/or enhance the capacity of the regional, sub-regional and national governance arrangements for the involvement of civil society in the implementation of the EBM/EAF approach (IGOs, NGOs, CBOs, private sector...)

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

Countries of the Wider Caribbean (Secretariat Convention Area)

Promoting greater engagement of civil society in existing governance arrangement of the Secretariat including encouraging participation at meetings of the STACs, COPs, IGM, promote participation as members of Project Steering Ctees, National Project Intersectoral Committees and other relevant project committees and working groups implemented/executed through UNEP CEP. This also includes direct engagement of NGOs/CBOs to support implementation of EBM related programmes, projects and activities.

For programmes, projects and activities e.g. In the development of UNEP CLME+ EBM sub-project and its ongoing implementation, civil society groups in Trinidad and Tobago, Suriname and Guyana have been actively engaged. Efforts are ongoing to ensure greater participation and representation of civil society in Secretariat organized meetings and to ensure that any material developed is effectively disseminated. EBM approaches to habitat degradation and pollution prevention are relatively new and more work is required at all levels to more effectively engage private sector and civil society in integrated planning processes. The new Strategy for the Secretariat promotes this integrated approach through tools such as Nature Based solutions, Marine Spatial Planning and Circular Economy. A new Strategic objective of the Secretariat on Ocean-Based or Blue Economies offers further opportunities for both EBM approaches and civil society and private sector involvement as well as the new Investment Plan developed under the CLME+ project.

CLME+, IWEco, CLME+, ACP MEA, Core Mandate

1.3 Evaluate expansion and strengthening of the mandate of organizations to effectively address issues relating to habitat degradation and pollution in the marine environment

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

Assess capacity and mandate of existing regional and sub-regional organizations to address issues relating to habitat degradation and marine pollution, evaluate the potential for expanding those mandates, as appropriate, as well as the capacity implications associated with these enhanced roles. This would include documenting how other agencies are supporting habitat degradation and pollution prevention to ensure synergies and reduce overlap and duplication. This could be achieved through mutual participation at decision making fora of these organizations and their potential for participation in joint projects and activities.

Many regional and sub-regional agencies - including several NGOs are working to support marine biodiversity conservation and habitat degradation with varying mandates. As far as the control, reduction and prevention of pollution, much fewer agencies are working on this in an integrated matter with many focusing on only a few waste streams. In that regard, the Cartagena Convention Secretariat is focusing less on promoting the expansion of mandates but facilitating greater cooperation and synergies. The development of Regional Activity Centers and Networks in support of the Convention and Protocol and other networks such as between multiple networks of MPAs including CAMPAM supports this process. With the increasing impact of plastics, sargassum, and ocean acidification in particular, more agencies are involved in plastics projects such as IUCN as well as the promotion of nature based solutions such as TNC.

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnuearcbjmmibnQSBBREcFs0iqGFrXonSvVcdoGJDY7cxBWye3hSb2WeWeHfJm0mQ9Wo

1.3 Evaluate expansion and strengthening of the mandate of organizations to effectively address issues relating to habitat degradation and pollution in the marine environment

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

Assess capacity and mandate of existing regional and sub-regional organizations to address issues relating to habitat degradation and marine pollution, evaluate the potential for expanding those mandates, as appropriate, as well as the capacity implications associated with these enhanced roles. This would include documenting how other agencies are supporting habitat degradation and pollution prevention to ensure synergies and reduce overlap and duplication. This could be achieved through mutual participation at decision making fora of these organizations and their potential for participation in joint projects and activities.

Many regional and sub-regional agencies - including several NGOs are working to support marine biodiversity conservation and habitat degradation with varying mandates. As far as the control, reduction and prevention of pollution, much fewer agencies are working on this in an integrated matter with many focusing on only a few waste streams. In that regard, the Cartagena Convention Secretariat is focusing less on promoting the expansion of mandates but facilitating greater cooperation and synergies. The development of Regional Activity Centers and Networks in support of the Convention and Protocol and other networks such as between multiple networks of MPAs including CAMPAM supports this process. With the increasing impact of plastics, sargassum, and ocean acidification in particular, more agencies are involved in plastics projects such as IUCN as well as the promotion of nature based solutions such as TNC.

1.2 Establish and strengthen regional institutional coordination and cooperation arrangements

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

https://www.unenvironment.org/cep/ratification-map-cartagena-convention-and-oil-spills-protocol

This includes all cooperative arrangements for protecting the marine environment, at the wider regional level and/or across the 3 CLME+ sub-ecosystem types. For cross-sectoral arrangements, see also SAP Strategy 3. For arrangements targeting a particular sub-ecosystem (coral / pelagic / continental shelf), see resp. SAP Strategies 4, 5 and 6.There are several IGO's and Institutions in the region that have a mandate to work on the marine environment. UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat as the lead organization for SAP Strategy would strive to establish formal and/or informal collaborative arrangements, in the form of bilateral MoUs, Letters of Agreement, working through the Secretariat's Regional Activity Centres and Regional Activity Networks and in direct partnership arrangements for project/programme development and implementation.

UNEP through the Cartagena Convention Secretariat has signed MoUs with the following organizations: CRFM, Sargasso Sea Commission, BASEL Convention Secretariat, OECS, CARICOM (under development), IMO, CBD, CITES, RAMSAR and IAEA. UNEP is also part of the ICM under the CLME+ Project and is expected to play a key role in the Coordinating Mechanism. During the implementation of the CLME+ Project, new cooperation agreements were developed with GCFI to co-host the Caribbean Regional Marine Litter Node, The Ocean Foundation, CATHALAC, INVEMAR and the OSPAR Commission. Host Country agreements for the Convention's Regional Activity Centres have been completed with France for SPAW RAC, Trinidad and Tobago for the LBS RAC IMA and with Government of Curacao for RAC REMPEITC on Oil Spills. Negotiations are ongoing to finalize such an agreement with the Government of Cuba for LBS RAC CIMAB. Other agencies such as CWWA, CAWASA, UWI, CANARI, TNC, IUCN, NOAA, US EPA, CDB, World Bank and IDB have collaborated on joint projects and publications.

As Required - This process is ongoing.

www.unenvironment.org/cep

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnucLvvDULNkpyy7FSFTm1Gkd9ySbep4pihgtxQkUXFH6vVh0e60AUiFB_cVf3OulIDw

1.2 Establish and strengthen regional institutional coordination and cooperation arrangements

UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat

https://www.unenvironment.org/cep/ratification-map-cartagena-convention-and-oil-spills-protocol

This includes all cooperative arrangements for protecting the marine environment, at the wider regional level and/or across the 3 CLME+ sub-ecosystem types. For cross-sectoral arrangements, see also SAP Strategy 3. For arrangements targeting a particular sub-ecosystem (coral / pelagic / continental shelf), see resp. SAP Strategies 4, 5 and 6.There are several IGO's and Institutions in the region that have a mandate to work on the marine environment. UNEP Cartagena Convention Secretariat as the lead organization for SAP Strategy would strive to establish formal and/or informal collaborative arrangements, in the form of bilateral MoUs, Letters of Agreement, working through the Secretariat's Regional Activity Centres and Regional Activity Networks and in direct partnership arrangements for project/programme development and implementation.

UNEP through the Cartagena Convention Secretariat has signed MoUs with the following organizations: CRFM, Sargasso Sea Commission, BASEL Convention Secretariat, OECS, CARICOM (under development), IMO, CBD, CITES, RAMSAR and IAEA. UNEP is also part of the ICM under the CLME+ Project and is expected to play a key role in the Coordinating Mechanism. During the implementation of the CLME+ Project, new cooperation agreements were developed with GCFI to co-host the Caribbean Regional Marine Litter Node, The Ocean Foundation, CATHALAC, INVEMAR and the OSPAR Commission. Host Country agreements for the Convention's Regional Activity Centres have been completed with France for SPAW RAC, Trinidad and Tobago for the LBS RAC IMA and with Government of Curacao for RAC REMPEITC on Oil Spills. Negotiations are ongoing to finalize such an agreement with the Government of Cuba for LBS RAC CIMAB. Other agencies such as CWWA, CAWASA, UWI, CANARI, TNC, IUCN, NOAA, US EPA, CDB, World Bank and IDB have collaborated on joint projects and publications.

As Required - This process is ongoing.

www.unenvironment.org/cep

5B.1 Establish key agreements and operationalise arrangements among organizations with a stake in large pelagics fisheries in order to implement EAF

WECAFC Area/Wider Caribbean Region/CLME+ region

At the 17 Session of WECAFC, in the USA, in July 2019, the Commission agreed to expand the mandate of the existing Joint Working Group on Flying Fish in the Eastern Caribbean to incorporate flying fish, dolphinfish and other pelagic species not managed by ICCAT

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnufSruxhRv3XqkvQrS7qggVvnZK46hy6qAjGeQ3-vjepfPJW45P5jnEJYPTHixsUQts

S2 - Sustainable Fisheries

2.13 Establish and/or enhance the data and information quality and collection and management capacity of the regional, sub-regional and national fisheries governance arrangements, including through the establishment of public-private partnerships

"Bearing in mind the need for improvements in basic information on fishery data and statistics and that the need to develop and implement agreed data sharing policies to support decision-making was noted as a chief impediment to strong and effective management of marine resources in the region (WECAFC 14, WECAFC 15), the FIRMS partnership was endorsed by WECAFC 15. The overarching aim of the FIRMS partnership is to provide decision-makers with sufficient and reliable information to develop effective fisheries policies in accordance with the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries. FAO provides the secretariat for the FIRMS partnership.

Activities undertaken achievements during phase I and II of the partnership were presented in WECAFC/SAG/VII/2015/7, WECAFC/SAG/VIII/2017/8 and WECAFC/SAG/IX/2018/11. The 2016-2017 (WECAFC-FIRMS phase I) achievements included strengthening national data collection through completion of inventories of stocks and fisheries in support of the three FMPs published in FIRMS; development of a prototype Regional Data Base (RDB); developing a Plan for identifying needs and building capacity and strengthening of selected national data collection systems; identifying minimum data needs for monitoring and stock assessment; translation of the FIRMS website into Spanish; and aregional data workshop convened in Barbados in January of 20162.

Under WECAFC-FIRMS phase II project, activities undertaken were primarily to support the
mandate of the Working Group on Fisheries Data and Statistics (FDS-WG), agreed by the
Members during the 16 Commission Session of WECAFC, in Guadeloupe in June 2016.
The Phase II project support focused on agreements regarding minimum data requirements for
fisheries under management plans, and on the governance and operationalization of the WECAFC Regional Database, including development of a regional data collection reference framework (DCRF) and documentation of best practices for logbooks and data sharing policies and guidelines. The 2017-2018 (WECAFC-FIRMS phase II) achievements included development of Data Collection Reference Framework document (DCRF) and associated Regional Data Access and Sharing Policies; draft Regional Logbook Guidelines; 1 st meeting of the WECAFC Fisheries Data and Statistics Working Group (FDS WG); intersessional FDS-WG Work Plan for 2018-2019 and WECAFC Regional Database fully functional.

At the 17 Session of WECAFC, the convener of the Fisheries Data and Statistics WG and WECAFC-FIRMS Regional Focal point, presented an update of the activities on data and statistics taking place under the WECAFC-FIRMS partnership, particularly a result of this collaborative platform which sets the framework for data collection and information sharing systems to support scientific and decision making processes and the connected capacity building activities. The Commission commended the WG for the hard work and enthusiasm invested in the development of such a robust framework (Data Collection Reference Framework – DCRF). The EU indicated that this work was outstanding, that it considered as a high priority to have such a system in place in the Region and that was the main reason for
supporting this initiative, including financially. The Commission emphasized the usefulness of the regional database for improving data collection, data management, including visualization and sustainable management of fisheries resources.

The Commission requested that some modifications be made to the draft recommendation on the DCRF, in particular the reference to RFMO and to the reporting requirements to ICCAT in the DCRF were considered unnecessary. The Commission adopted the recommendation as an Interim Data Collection Reference Framework, pending additional technical edits to be provided intersessionally, in order to adopt the Data Collection Reference Framework at the next plenary meeting of WECAFC."

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnueKV5RdQ02VKPyzQ26vbWavGx0W6uzJA4RKOnq6r_LryYB3AEB1vVWm7OB-0qBo6jY

2.13 Establish and/or enhance the data and information quality and collection and management capacity of the regional, sub-regional and national fisheries governance arrangements, including through the establishment of public-private partnerships

"Bearing in mind the need for improvements in basic information on fishery data and statistics and that the need to develop and implement agreed data sharing policies to support decision-making was noted as a chief impediment to strong and effective management of marine resources in the region (WECAFC 14, WECAFC 15), the FIRMS partnership was endorsed by WECAFC 15. The overarching aim of the FIRMS partnership is to provide decision-makers with sufficient and reliable information to develop effective fisheries policies in accordance with the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries. FAO provides the secretariat for the FIRMS partnership.

Activities undertaken achievements during phase I and II of the partnership were presented in WECAFC/SAG/VII/2015/7, WECAFC/SAG/VIII/2017/8 and WECAFC/SAG/IX/2018/11. The 2016-2017 (WECAFC-FIRMS phase I) achievements included strengthening national data collection through completion of inventories of stocks and fisheries in support of the three FMPs published in FIRMS; development of a prototype Regional Data Base (RDB); developing a Plan for identifying needs and building capacity and strengthening of selected national data collection systems; identifying minimum data needs for monitoring and stock assessment; translation of the FIRMS website into Spanish; and aregional data workshop convened in Barbados in January of 20162.

Under WECAFC-FIRMS phase II project, activities undertaken were primarily to support the
mandate of the Working Group on Fisheries Data and Statistics (FDS-WG), agreed by the
Members during the 16 Commission Session of WECAFC, in Guadeloupe in June 2016.
The Phase II project support focused on agreements regarding minimum data requirements for
fisheries under management plans, and on the governance and operationalization of the WECAFC Regional Database, including development of a regional data collection reference framework (DCRF) and documentation of best practices for logbooks and data sharing policies and guidelines. The 2017-2018 (WECAFC-FIRMS phase II) achievements included development of Data Collection Reference Framework document (DCRF) and associated Regional Data Access and Sharing Policies; draft Regional Logbook Guidelines; 1 st meeting of the WECAFC Fisheries Data and Statistics Working Group (FDS WG); intersessional FDS-WG Work Plan for 2018-2019 and WECAFC Regional Database fully functional.

At the 17 Session of WECAFC, the convener of the Fisheries Data and Statistics WG and WECAFC-FIRMS Regional Focal point, presented an update of the activities on data and statistics taking place under the WECAFC-FIRMS partnership, particularly a result of this collaborative platform which sets the framework for data collection and information sharing systems to support scientific and decision making processes and the connected capacity building activities. The Commission commended the WG for the hard work and enthusiasm invested in the development of such a robust framework (Data Collection Reference Framework – DCRF). The EU indicated that this work was outstanding, that it considered as a high priority to have such a system in place in the Region and that was the main reason for
supporting this initiative, including financially. The Commission emphasized the usefulness of the regional database for improving data collection, data management, including visualization and sustainable management of fisheries resources.

The Commission requested that some modifications be made to the draft recommendation on the DCRF, in particular the reference to RFMO and to the reporting requirements to ICCAT in the DCRF were considered unnecessary. The Commission adopted the recommendation as an Interim Data Collection Reference Framework, pending additional technical edits to be provided intersessionally, in order to adopt the Data Collection Reference Framework at the next plenary meeting of WECAFC."

S2 - Sustainable Fisheries

2.12 Strengthen the capacity of the regional and sub-regional arrangements to support countries in becoming parties to relevant international and regional agreements and complying with their global and regional commitments towards the sustainable use and conservation of the marine environment and associated living resources (including the support to update and harmonize national legislation and regulations)

FAO/WECAFC has been providing support to countries within the CLME+ region to enable them to become parties to the PSMA and implement it. At the 17 Session of WECAFC, in July 2019, the Commission acknowledged the proportion of the number of parties to the FAO Agreement on Port State Measures to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate IUU Fishing (PSMA), in the WECAFC area, one of the highest in the world, stressed the importance of further increasing that number, and took note of the decision of Trinidad and Tobago to accede to the PSMA and related efforts by Jamaica.

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnucMyqyeGRs32bpR2xPOlekAcXJoZYeGEAhPXGrGytIuMI98DbCNhdBuSqqz8J2H_-k

2.12 Strengthen the capacity of the regional and sub-regional arrangements to support countries in becoming parties to relevant international and regional agreements and complying with their global and regional commitments towards the sustainable use and conservation of the marine environment and associated living resources (including the support to update and harmonize national legislation and regulations)

FAO/WECAFC has been providing support to countries within the CLME+ region to enable them to become parties to the PSMA and implement it. At the 17 Session of WECAFC, in July 2019, the Commission acknowledged the proportion of the number of parties to the FAO Agreement on Port State Measures to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate IUU Fishing (PSMA), in the WECAFC area, one of the highest in the world, stressed the importance of further increasing that number, and took note of the decision of Trinidad and Tobago to accede to the PSMA and related efforts by Jamaica.

5A.2 Establish and operationalise a formal agreement between the CRFM and France on the management of the flyingfish fisheries

Although CRFM Member States, through endorsement of the sub-regional FMP, are committed to collaboration in the conservation, management and sustainable use of the flyingfish resources and associated ecosystems, the absence of a mechanism for collaboration between the CRFM and France may hamper full application of an ecosystem approach to assessment and management of flyingfish fisheries in the region. The CRFM Ministerial Council, in October 2014, endorsed establishing a formal CRFM-France relationship within the context of a broader CARICOM-wide cooperation initiative Attempts to negotiate an agreement for collaboration between the CRFM and France in the sustainable use, conservation and management of the flyingfish resources and other shared fisheries resources and in combating IUU fishing are to be facilitated.

Several steps to enhance the partnership between CRFM and France with regards to Eastern Caribbean flyingfish fisheries have taken place. A draft (technical/management) Cooperation Agreement with France (Martinique) has been developed) and is included as Annex E to the Eastern Caribbean Flyingfish Fishery Management Plan 2020-2025. The CRFM Ministerial Council has approved the process going forward toward its final negotiation, approval and signature, noting that this process may, perforce, have to continue post-subproject. The subproject hosted meetings where stakeholders provided input and feedback on the partnership development process and other subproject outputs; including a special meeting of the WECAFC Working Group on Flyingfish (in October 2018,(including representatives of the French authorities/agencies) and a regional consultation of flyingfish (in May 2019, also attended by representatives of the French authorities/agencies), as well as supporting the 3rd Meeting of the CRFM’s Ministerial Sub-Committee on Flyingfish (MSCFF). Ongoing work will seek to continue post sub project to strengthen collaboration.

CRFM Portal will be updated shortly

Draft Cooperation Agreement with France (Martinique)

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnudEdUM1ugxqardWOCa34efrAtEOM2ZCiwU1VDxgDbNflWMMGJLOUktB5SLvGnd8v6k

S3 - Regional Coordination

3.7 Facilitate the preparation of data and information products and the uptake of monitoring and research outputs by (sub)regional and national science-policy interfaces

The Action calls for steps to be undertaken to facilitate data/information-driven ocean governance and ecosystem-based management of the living marine resources in the Caribbean and North Brazil Shelf LME's. This is a broad, multi-facetic action. The present record documents progress towards the creation of a formal, collaborative, regional integrated reporting mechanism on the "State of the Marine Environment and associated Socio-Economics" (SOMEE).

1. In 2017 an "Interim Coordination Mechanism" (CLME+ ICM), consisting of 8 IGO's with a marine-related mandate in the wider Caribbean region was created. The ICM has among its core functions: "Collaborative development of a State of the Marine Ecosystems and associated Economies" reporting mechanism, and the active promotion of its institutionalization as a means to bridge the science-policy gap.
2. In the coming years (2021-2022), the ICM is expected to transit into, or be replaced by a formally established, long-term ocean coordination mechanism for the Caribbean and North Brazil Shelf Large Marine Ecosystems. This "PROCARIBE" (currently proposed name) Coordination Mechanism has as part of its proposed core functions: "Providing a platform for cyclical Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis/Strategic Action Programme (“TDA/SAP”) processes, including
the coordination of the periodic assessment of and reporting on the state of the marine environment and associated economies in the MOU Area and the monitoring, periodic evaluation and revision of MoU Area SAPs".
3. The UNDP/GEF CLME+ Project (2015-2021) has facilitated the development, by selected IGO members and with the contributions of others, and in alignment with each IGO's formal mandate, of a number of sub-reports, as well as a number of "thematic briefs", which, taken together, are now considered to constitute a first practical delivery on the "SOMEE" concept. These sub-reports, of which the production of their first-ever edition has been facilitated by the CLME+ Project, and which have also helped e.g. UNEP CEP fulfil its formal reporting obligations under the LBS and SPAW Protocols, are seen as the building blocks for what is to become a regular, periodic integrated SOMEE reporting effort, coordinated by the (I)CM Secretariat and co-owned by its Membership (a partial, prototype integrated "SOMEE" report is currently under development through the CLME+ Project). The SOMEE reporting efforts are meant to support the development, and monitoring and evaluation of implementation progress, of regional and sub-regional Strategic Action Programmes and Plans, and associated IGO Work Programmes.
4. Major challenges faced in the context of the "SOMEE" efforts relate to the absence of a consolidated marine data infrastructure in the region that would facilitate access to key data sets, as well as to the persistence of important data and information gaps. The CLME+ Project Coordination Unit is currently in the process of elaborating the Terms of Reference for a baseline study aimed at supporting the progressive development of a solid "Marine Data/Information Infrastructure" for the region; such ehanced infrastructure will be key to enhanced decision-making, and associated reporting efforts.

https://clmeplus.org/regional-coordination-mechanisms/#ICM; https://clmeplus.org/somee-content/;

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnueog6asPSzcm4Upg3K93kBqrTub0E3kz5-d7f1EZKWbuTO3aAA_o1Xtjsvy1OPCfJI

3.7 Facilitate the preparation of data and information products and the uptake of monitoring and research outputs by (sub)regional and national science-policy interfaces

The Action calls for steps to be undertaken to facilitate data/information-driven ocean governance and ecosystem-based management of the living marine resources in the Caribbean and North Brazil Shelf LME's. This is a broad, multi-facetic action. The present record documents progress towards the creation of a formal, collaborative, regional integrated reporting mechanism on the "State of the Marine Environment and associated Socio-Economics" (SOMEE).

1. In 2017 an "Interim Coordination Mechanism" (CLME+ ICM), consisting of 8 IGO's with a marine-related mandate in the wider Caribbean region was created. The ICM has among its core functions: "Collaborative development of a State of the Marine Ecosystems and associated Economies" reporting mechanism, and the active promotion of its institutionalization as a means to bridge the science-policy gap.
2. In the coming years (2021-2022), the ICM is expected to transit into, or be replaced by a formally established, long-term ocean coordination mechanism for the Caribbean and North Brazil Shelf Large Marine Ecosystems. This "PROCARIBE" (currently proposed name) Coordination Mechanism has as part of its proposed core functions: "Providing a platform for cyclical Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis/Strategic Action Programme (“TDA/SAP”) processes, including
the coordination of the periodic assessment of and reporting on the state of the marine environment and associated economies in the MOU Area and the monitoring, periodic evaluation and revision of MoU Area SAPs".
3. The UNDP/GEF CLME+ Project (2015-2021) has facilitated the development, by selected IGO members and with the contributions of others, and in alignment with each IGO's formal mandate, of a number of sub-reports, as well as a number of "thematic briefs", which, taken together, are now considered to constitute a first practical delivery on the "SOMEE" concept. These sub-reports, of which the production of their first-ever edition has been facilitated by the CLME+ Project, and which have also helped e.g. UNEP CEP fulfil its formal reporting obligations under the LBS and SPAW Protocols, are seen as the building blocks for what is to become a regular, periodic integrated SOMEE reporting effort, coordinated by the (I)CM Secretariat and co-owned by its Membership (a partial, prototype integrated "SOMEE" report is currently under development through the CLME+ Project). The SOMEE reporting efforts are meant to support the development, and monitoring and evaluation of implementation progress, of regional and sub-regional Strategic Action Programmes and Plans, and associated IGO Work Programmes.
4. Major challenges faced in the context of the "SOMEE" efforts relate to the absence of a consolidated marine data infrastructure in the region that would facilitate access to key data sets, as well as to the persistence of important data and information gaps. The CLME+ Project Coordination Unit is currently in the process of elaborating the Terms of Reference for a baseline study aimed at supporting the progressive development of a solid "Marine Data/Information Infrastructure" for the region; such ehanced infrastructure will be key to enhanced decision-making, and associated reporting efforts.

https://clmeplus.org/regional-coordination-mechanisms/#ICM; https://clmeplus.org/somee-content/;

5A.2 Establish and operationalise a formal agreement between the CRFM and France on the management of the flyingfish fisheries

Agreement on cooperative arrangements for management of the flyingfish resources, to inform elements of a related Memorandum of Understanding or cooperation agreement.

Draft coperation agreement for the management of living marine resources (including flyingfish) has been developed with input from stakeholders (including some French) and approved by CRFM Ministerial Council for final negotiation to proceed

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnud6yK5OJr89kv_eL47VNIieDBCZ2f2L_cTsda9mEFZD38p45FBs5SUHza8CLGI0nOE

S3 - Regional Coordination

3.3 Adopt and operationalise the permanent regional policy coordination mechanism for shared Living Marine Resources (sLMR) governance

Carribean and North Brazil Shelf LME

During a virtual meeting of the CLME+ PSC which took place in June 2020, the PSC endorsed in principle core aspects of the Coordination Mechanism, including scope and functions

Decision available on CLME+ Project Website intranet: www.clmeproject.org

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnucUTWpG7kn40lddBrIc0qmoAQ4oLfvAg5FkDpM3c5DqBHrD2Ri8QbEm3sUxFwAjDLs

3.3 Adopt and operationalise the permanent regional policy coordination mechanism for shared Living Marine Resources (sLMR) governance

Carribean and North Brazil Shelf LME

During a virtual meeting of the CLME+ PSC which took place in June 2020, the PSC endorsed in principle core aspects of the Coordination Mechanism, including scope and functions

Decision available on CLME+ Project Website intranet: www.clmeproject.org

S6 - Continental Shelf Subecosystem

6.6 Operationalise and further enhance an interlinked, sub-regional decision support systems (DSS) for sustainable fisheries and environmental protection in the Guianas-Brazil continental shelf

Management of national shrimp and groundfish resources requires readily available and updated information on the state of catches, the state of fisheries, fisheries trends and status of exploited stocks

With support from the Fisheries Statistics Branch at FAO HQ and international consultants the data collection protocols and systems of T&T and Suriname are being enhanced. This includes the creation of observer programmes and improved data collection for bottom trawling fleets as well as the development of a statistical storage system software that fits the needs and requirements of each country

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnufUTb9tHBMTIoRg-ehdUdj6H8_hEOyimJuyyoZO5_XXA_fzlJBzp-a6OhVrYIwKezE

S6 - Continental Shelf Subecosystem

6.6 Operationalise and further enhance an interlinked, sub-regional decision support systems (DSS) for sustainable fisheries and environmental protection in the Guianas-Brazil continental shelf

Management of marine fisheries resources requires readily available and updated information on fisheries trends and status of exploited stocks.

With support from the Fisheries Statistics Branch at FAO HQ and international consultants the DSS is being developed under the iMarine platform (Data e-Infrastructure Initiative for Fisheries Management and Conservation of Marine Living Resources). The DSS is being tailored to provide updated information on fisheries and stocks and with capacity to conduct some stock assessment methods.

FAO CLME+ Subproject on shrimp and groundfish of the NBSLME

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnufo7cilhjcZQy4jfVSfDix8sVl42JX-BBO0i7XQu2zSbRL6FNC6mhl-b_4Pa9kQFLM

4B.5 Operationalise and strengthen a DSS for the queen conch fisheries (including linkages to the DSS for the protection and sustainable management of reefs and associated living marine resources)

The queen conch fishery integrates fisheries management and conservation policies and activities greatly due to the inclusion of this species in CITES. This is also a SPAW species, but this organization is not yet actively participating in the management of this valuable resource.

The Scientific, Statistical and Technical Advisory Group of the CFMC/OSPESCA/WECAFC/CRFM/CITES Queen Conch Working Group was held 23-26 Apr, 2019. One of the conclusions coming out of this meeting was that WECAFC is expected to coordinate the structure of a research proposal to attend to some of the priority actions identified as relevant to the sustainability of the fishery.

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnud5V2W6TC4qGRmZ-MtbsbTFiKiXgHouWIFPogjtA0Kq6iD7ZdgIXda5Qm5SShhXYSc

4B.5 Operationalise and strengthen a DSS for the queen conch fisheries (including linkages to the DSS for the protection and sustainable management of reefs and associated living marine resources)

4B.5 Operationalise and strengthen a DSS for the queen conch fisheries (including linkages to the DSS for the protection and sustainable management of reefs and associated living marine resources)

One of the overall objectives of the Plan is to improve the collection and integration of the scientific data needed to determine the overall queen conch population as the basis for the application of ecosystem-based management.

Next Meeting of the Working Group tentatively scheduled for Oct, 2020.

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnufogL0H3DUi_sil6zWZCgsuTh28fDdvPOid7Zka_tXhH5rQ1NAY-KgR47oDYXQbIXo

4B.5 Operationalise and strengthen a DSS for the queen conch fisheries (including linkages to the DSS for the protection and sustainable management of reefs and associated living marine resources)

4A.4 Operationalise and strengthen a DSS for the spiny lobster fisheries (including linkages to the DSS for the protection and sustainable management of reefs and associated living marine resources)

Have the generation of data and information that provide sufficient knowledge to make better decisions in the management of lobster fisheries.

Support to countries in the methodology for data collection and analysis for the evaluation of Caribbean lobster stocks (MARPLESCA Plan), and its implementation in a computer platform. With support from OIRSA, we work on the traceability standard of fishery products and the computer platform.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GdUIrQhGfWmJkuzm-51xXS6r6WTXJNkg/view?usp=sharing

Ecolangosta+, ResCA Langosta

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZBD_19RyDtHFjLy8JydmwNHdHdtj3BQjnLmMOPVvrRd8AAA/viewform?edit2=2_ABaOnufIDpNWFRm6c9UX31euBZs-YWpX2MJ5xBhymN9ll5xz-TUeVK3WJCN6YwWWM0STYxs