ACC Rubric 2.0


1	ACC Match Grading Rubric
2	The following Rubric is the standarized tool ACC Judges use when grading an ACC match. For more details on the ACC Rules and Guidelines, see the ACC Guide: https://goo.gl/MMY6nR
3	Disqualification will occur in the event that a writer: (A.) Does not meet the word minimum for a post; (B.) Exceeds word cap for a post; or (C.) Flagrantly plagerises another author's work.
4	Judges Rubric
5	Syntax (15%)
6	Proper use of grammar, syntax, tense, and formatting all factor into a writers Syntax score, as well as keeping the language both in-line with and approriate for the Star Wars universe.	Detractors	1	2	3	4	5
7		- The excessive use of chat speak such as "u" "ur" or "idk my bff Alaris?")	The posts are very difficult to read and show a poor general grasp of the English language, syntax, and how to format and use it to describe the actions that are taking place within the posts. Lack of effort in having the text proofread is evident.	The posts will have numerous, repeated errors in the basic aspects of syntax and grammar such as incorrect capitalization, lack of use of apostrophes or commas, as well as awkward and distracting formatting. The vocabulary used will also be very basic, repeatative and unvaried.	Average command of syntax. The posts are readable, but multiple errors in grammar, spelling and improper formatting distract from a fluid experience for the reader.	There are syntax errors present but none detract from the overall reading of each post. Repetitive language or a repeated grammatical error generally seperates a 4 in language from a 5.	There are no detected errors in spelling, grammar, or mechanics, and each post is properly formatted in every way, including dialogue. Formatting, where used, enhances the post without detracting in any way.
8		- Writing in the wrong point-of-view and tense
9		- Profanity not appropriate for the Star Wars universe such as slurs and swearing.
10	Story (40%)
11	Covers the who, what, where, when, why, and how of the match. If the events described were paraphrased to a third party, would that person want to read the actual match? This covers how well the writer explained the characters' motivations for fighting, as well as implications for the audience as to why they should care about the outcome.	Detractors	1	2	3	4	5
12		- Lack of "Action" illustrated to drive the "conflict" of the encounter between the writers' characters.	The posts contain severe structural issues from a literary standpoint. As written, the fighting could have taken place in a large featureless room, because interactions with the environment were nonexistant. The reader has no reason to care about what's happening, and that's probably because very little actually does happen except description of the action of the conflict. The posts seem rushed, and shortcuts were lazily exploited for convenience over narrative value. A score like this is usually accompanied with severe issues in other categories as well.	At this level, the story is generally very cliché or the outcome is abundently clear from the very begining. Posts might contain very little explanation for the fighting, or will completely fail to address why the characters are fighting in the first place. Often the venue environment of the match is largely ignored, giving no impact on the actions of the fight itself. Generally, with a story score lower than 3, the posts seem rushed, as the writer has not devoted enough time for anything significant to happen with the conflict between the characters.	The "average" ACC match. At this level, the writer generally provides an in-character reason for the conflict, as well as the character's motives and feelings, but the match itself won't feel unique. If paraphrased in a few sentences, the match would sound very similar to a large number of other ACC matches. While not overly cliché or boring, little stands out that would make this match unique from the countless other matches in the ACC. The story has the makings of a good initial draft that should have been fleshed out.	At this level, the fight becomes actually interesting to read. Generally, significant context is provided explaining the characters' motivations and purpose for being in the venue. The description of the fighting itself will also be varied. The features of the environment are highlighed in the descriptions and matter for the story.	At this level, the story is truly unique. The reader will care about the characters, and the match will provoke a true emotional response. At this level, the writer will succesfully employ literary techniques such as foreshadowing, dramatic irony, and plot twists.
13		- Using an NPC as a deus-ex machina (cop-out ending) or crutch.
14	Realism (25%)
15	Covers the adherence to the Character Sheets, the ACC Guidelines, and keeping with the theme and style of the Star Wars expanded universe. Mechanics such as the use of Force Powers, Skills, and Feats mix with realistic depictions of injury, interaction with the environment, and the ability to use suspension of disbelief properly without taking a reader out of the story. It also covers the adherence to the venue and the information listed in paramaters of the match such as weapons and "mode".	Detractors	1	2	3	4	5
16		Major	Two major detractors or related issues were found by the judge.	The judge noted at least one major detractor and one other noticible minor detractor that aide in breaking suspension of disbelief.	One large detractor, or several small detractors caused for a break in the readers' suspension of disbelief.	One to two small detractors that the judge noted.	No errors were found by the judge.
17		-Godmodding
18		- Ignoring Skills, Force Powers, or Aspects relative to a member's Character Sheet
19		- Using Skills, Force Powers, or Feats not listed on a member's Character Sheet
20		- Writing a character 'out of character'
21		Minor
22		Writing a weapon that is not listed in the match details or innorganic to the venue
23		- Misapplication of a skill, feat or Force Power that is found on the character sheet
24		- Creative license stretches the laws of physics as we know them and how they could apply in the SW Universe, including weapon-type damage
25	Continuity (20%)
26	Covers the attention to the details of a match. It covers the adherence to what appears or transpires in previous posts by both the writer and their opponent.	Detractors (Details)	1	2	3	4	5
27		Major	Two Major details were ignored. Extremely obvious that the author did not read his or her opponent's posts at all.	The judges noted one major detail and one or more minor details that were ignored or ommited from the writers posts.	The judge spotted either a single major or multiple noticeable, but minor, omissions of elements that could have made a difference in the conflict.	One or two small details are missing to transition the posts together.	No errors were found by the judge, posts flowed seamlessly from one to another.
28		- Ignoring damage established in a previous post.
29		- Randomly changing the venue between posts.
30		- Randomly changing the venue between posts.
31		Minor
32		-Small character details that aren't consistent from post to post (ie: red lightsaber in one post, blue lightsaber in the next post)
33


1	The following is an expanded breakdown of things that judges take into consideration when grading an ACC Match. This information is for the benefit of the members and is intended to help add a layer of transparency into the subtler nuances that judges consider when making decisions.
2	Every ACC Match is graded against itself. A judge will apply the same critera to both writers' posts, but grade points given in one match should not be used for comparison in another match.
3	Examples of both major and minor detractors include but are not limited to the details outlined on the rubric.
4	Syntax
5	With Syntax, each writer starts at a 5, with each subsequent set of errors counting against and lowering the score between tiers.
6	Language	The writer demonstrates a command of the English language and incorporates writing techniques such as alliterations, metaphors, parallel structures and more in the correct manner.
7	Story
8	With Story, each writer works their way towards a 5 by demonstrating skill in this category.
9	Conflict, Action, Humor	While "Combat" literally sits at the center and of the Antei Combat Center, the real draw to a duel between writers and their characters comes from the story of the conflict that ultimately invests a readers intention into the fight. While combat writing is important, a good ACCer can weave dialogue, humor, and dramatic tension with clear and visualy stimulating description of the actions taking place. That said, if a post contains no actual combat or engagement between the two fighters, this will be considered a detractor to Story scoring.
10	Realism
11	With Realism and Continuity, each writer starts at a 5, with each subsequent set of errors counting against and lowering the score between tiers.
12	Suspension of disbelief	Refers to a writer's ability to infuse "human interest and a semblance of truth" into a fictional tale in a manner that allows a reader to suspend judgement concerning the implausibility of the narrative. The Star Wars universe is a mixture of science fiction and fantasy, but has rules and guidelines that create a realistic adhesion to the universe. Writing in the ACC highlights a conflict between two individuals, such that neither character is clearly the protagonist. When impropable events compound in favor of one character over the other, the suspension of disbelief is broken.
13	Continuity
14	Details are Detractor points	Continuity details include, but are not limited to: lightsaber colors, character handedness, and consistency with objects and obstacles established in previous posts. If a table is broken in post 1, it should be broken in later posts.