This bill would, among other things, require a deployer, as defined, and a developer of an automated decision tool, as defined, to, on or before January 1, 2025, and annually thereafter, perform an impact assessment for any automated decision tool the deployer uses that includes, among other things, a statement of the purpose of the automated decision tool and its intended benefits, uses, and deployment contexts.

This bill would enact the California AI-ware Act, which would establish, within the Department of Technology, the Office of Artificial Intelligence, and would grant the office the powers and authorities power and authority necessary to guide the design, use, and deployment of automated systems

This bill would provide that a provision in an agreement between an individual and any other person for the performance of personal or professional services is contrary to public policy and deemed unconscionable if the provision meets specified conditions relating to the use of a digital replica of the voice or likeness of an individual in lieu of the work of the individual or to train a generative artificial intelligence system

This bill dedicate funds to research the feasibility and risks of using advanced technology, such as artificial intelligence dialogue systems, to improve government services.

This bill would, until January 1, 2030, create the California Interagency AI Working Group to deliver a report to the Legislature, as prescribed, regarding artificial intelligence.

The bill would require the commission to explore, among other things, the persons and populations that use social media and the negative mental health risks associated with social media and artificial intelligence, as defined.

This measure would urge the United States government to impose an immediately moratorium on the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4 for at least 6 months to allow time to develop much-needed AI governance systems.

This measure would express the support of the Legislature for the 23 Asilomar AI Principles as guiding values for the development of artificial intelligence and of related public policy

This measure would affirm the California Legislature’s commitment to President Biden’s vision for a safe AI and the principles outlined in the “Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights” and would express the Legislature’s commitment to examining and implementing those principles in its legislation and policies related to the use and deployment of automated systems.

This bill mandates the Department of Technology to set up safety, privacy, and fairness guidelines for artificial intelligence (AI) services. Starting August 1, 2025, the state can only sign AI service contracts with providers that comply with these standards.

This bill proposes establishing the California AI Research Hub within the Government Operations Agency to foster partnerships among government, academia, and the private sector for AI advancement, emphasizing public good, privacy, security, and risk mitigation.

The Artificial Intelligence Accountability Act requires a report on generative AI's pros and cons for state use, risk assessments on AI threats to infrastructure, clear disclosure when state agencies use AI to communicate, and risk checks on automated decision systems before state agencies use them.

This bill would declare the intent of the Legislature to subsequently amend this bill to include provisions that would require California-based companies that are in the business of generative artificial intelligence to implement the Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity’s technical open standard and content credentials into their tools and platforms.

This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation that would create a disclosure requirement for content generated through artificial intelligence.

This bill would enact legislation in response to child pornogrophy generated by Artificial Intelligence.

This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation that would establish a mechanism to allow consumers to easily determine whether images, audio, video, or text was created by generative artificial intelligence.

This bill would additionally make a person guilty of a misdemeanor or a felony if the person knowingly develops, duplicates, prints, or exchanges any representation of information, data, or image, generated using artificial intelligence, that depicts a person under the age of 18 years engaged in an act of sexual conduct, as specified.

This bill mandates sellers or providers of AI technology that generates synthetic media, like images, videos, or voices, to issue a warning about potential legal risks of misuse. The Department of Consumer Affairs will detail the warning's specifics, and violations will incur civil penalties.

This bill mandates that by January 1, 2026, developers of AI systems or services offered in California must publish online documentation about the data used to train these AI tools, regardless of whether they are free or paid.

This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation relating to commercial algorithms and artificial intelligence-enabled medical devices.

This bill introduces the Safe and Secure Innovation for Frontier AI Systems Act, which obligates developers to assess the safety of AI models before training them, ensuring they don't have or approach hazardous capabilities, considering safety margins and potential post-training changes.

This bill mandates that creators and distributors of certain political ads must disclose if AI was used in their creation. It covers ads related to elections, candidates, and measures, and allows voters to seek legal action against non-compliant ads.

This bill would ban the use of AI as a substitute for community college faculty in teaching and student interaction, allowing its use only as a support tool for tasks like course development, assessment, and tutoring.

Support the state’s efforts in meeting the challenges posed by urgent and critical issues such as climate change, cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, and workforce shortages

This bill would expand that definition of “automatic dialing-announcing device” to include calls made using an artificial voice, as specified.

This bill would require a health care service plan or health insurer to ensure that a licensed physician supervises the use of artificial intelligence decisionmaking tools when those tools are used to inform decisions to approve, modify, or deny requests by providers for authorization prior to, or concurrent with, the provision of health care services to enrollees or insureds.

This bill calls for the Superintendent and the State Board of Education to set up a group by January 1, 2025, to study the use of AI in education, its future potential, and to create guidelines to ensure these technologies enhance education and critical skills without undermining staff roles.

This bill would provide that a provision in an agreement between an individual and any other person for the performance of personal or professional services is contrary to public policy and deemed unconscionable if the provision meets specified conditions relating to the use of a digital replica of the voice or likeness of an individual in lieu of the work of the individual or to train a generative artificial intelligence system.

This bill mandates a public higher education institution to form a group focused on AI and deepfakes, to assess their effects and advise lawmakers and the public. This group will include diverse representatives and key officials, and must report its findings annually starting January 1, 2026.

This bill mandates the Superintendent, with the State Board of Education, to form a group to review AI in education and report their recommendations to the Legislature.

This bill indicates the Legislature's plan to mandate that legal professionals disclose if they've used AI or machine learning in creating court documents in this state.

This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation to define the term ”artificial intelligence.”

Bill Text - AB-2876 Pupil instruction: media literacy: artificial intelligence literacy: curriculum frameworks: instructional materials. (ca.gov)

The bill would also require the commission to consider incorporating Artificial Intelligence (AI) literacy content into the mathematics, science, and history-social science curriculum frameworks

This bill would require a property and casualty insurer to disclose to an applicant or insured when it has used artificial intelligence to make decisions on, or make decisions that affect, applications and claims review, as specified.

This bill would prohibit a deployer from using an automated decision tool in a manner that results in algorithmic discrimination, which the bill would define to mean the condition in which an automated decision tool contributes to unjustified differential treatment or impacts disfavoring people based on their actual or perceived race, color, ethnicity, sex, religion, age, national origin, limited English proficiency, disability, veteran status, genetic information, reproductive health, or any other classification protected by state law.

This bill would prohibit a person, committee, or other entity from knowingly distributing an advertisement or other election communication, as defined, that contains certain materially deceptive and digitally altered or digitally created images or audio or video files, as defined, with the intent to influence an election or solicit funds for a candidate or campaign, subject to specified exemptions.

This bill would provide that an AI-generating entity or individual that creates a deepfake using a person’s name, voice, signature, photograph, or likeness, in any manner, without permission from the person being depicted in the deepfake, is liable for the actual damages suffered by the person or persons as a result of the unauthorized use.

This bill would declare the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation relating to artificial intelligence.

This bill would state that it is the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation to promote economic security and stability for California residents by creating a universal basic income program for residents whose employment is replaced by artificial intelligence.

This bill would require data digesters to register with the agency, pay a registration fee, and provide specified information, prescribe penalties for a failure to register as required by these provisions

This bill mandates that health entities using AI to generate patient communications must include a disclaimer about the AI's use and provide instructions for direct contact with a health care provider. Non-compliance won't result in disciplinary, civil, or criminal liabilities.

Starting February 1, 2025, the California Provenance, Authenticity, and Watermarking Standards Act mandates AI system providers to embed hard-to-detect, durable watermarks with provenance data in AI-generated content. Providers must report any AI system vulnerabilities or failures to the Department of Technology and inform other providers within 24 hours. Additionally, conversational AI systems must clearly inform users when they are interacting with synthetic content.