ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAAABACADAEAFAGAHAIAJAKALAMANAOAPAQARASATAUAVAWAXAYAZBABBBCBDBEBFBGBHBIBJBKBLBMBNBOBP
1
TypeAuthorAuthorDocumentAuthorDocumentAuthorAuthorManuscriptManuscriptDocumentAuthorAuthorCouncilAuthorDocumentAuthorCouncilAuthorAuthorCouncilAuthorAuthorCouncilAuthorCouncilManuscriptManuscriptAuthorAuthorAuthirAuthorAuthorCouncilAuthorDocumentAuthorAuthorAuthorAuthorAuthorDocumentAuthorAuthorAuthorAuthorAuthorAuthorAuthorAuthorAuthorAuthorAuthorCouncilAuthorAuthorAuthorAuthorCouncilConfessionConfessionDocumentDocumentDocumentDocumentDocumentDocumentDocument
2
AuthorSirachJosephusBryennios ListMelito of SardisMuratorian FragmentBabylonian TalmudOrigenCodex Vaticanus (B)Codex Sinaiticus (S)Codex ClaromontanusEusebius of CaesareaCyril of JerusalemSynod of LaodiceaHilary of PoitiersMommsen CatalogueAthanasius of AlexandriaApostolic Canons 85Amphilochius of IconiumGregory of NazianzusCouncil of RomeEpiphanius of SalamisJeromeCouncil of HippoAugustineThird Council of CarthageCodex Alexandrinus (A)Codex Ephraemi Rescriptus (C)Rufinus of AquileiaPope Innocent ICassiodorusLeontius of ByzantiumPope HormisdasDecree of GelasiusIsidore of SevilleCatalogue of the Sixty Canonical BooksJohn of DamascusRabanus MaurusStichometery of NicephorusHugh of St. VictorPeter the VenerableGlossa OrdinariaPeter BlensensisRichard of St. VictorJohn of Salisbury Petrus ComestorHugh of St. CherThomas AquinasNicholas of LyraWilliam of OckhamSt. Antoninus of FlorenceAlonso TostadoDenis the CarthusianCouncil of FlorenceJacobus Faber StapulensisJohannes DriedoThomas CajetanJohn Wild (Ferus)Council of Trent39 Articles of ReligionThe French ConfessionGeneva BibleBelgic Confession of FaithKing James BibleWestminster Confession of FaithSavoy Declaration of FaithThe Confession of Dositheus / Synod of Jerusalem1689 London Baptist Confession of Faith
3
Dates of list/author2nd c. B. C.94 - 100 AD100 - 150170170 / 2nd - 4th c.200 AD185 - 2544th c.4th c. (post 325)4th c.325 (pre)350363 (ca.)364-367365 (pre)367375 - 380380 (ca.)381 - 390382385 (ca.), 392390s - 4033933963975th c.5th c.404 (ca.)405485 - 585485 - 543514 - 523 (Pope)550 (ca.)560 - 6367th c.730 (ca.)780 - 8569th c.1096 - 11411092 - 115612th c.1130 - 12031173 (death)1110s - 11801178 (death)1200 – 12631225 - 12741270 - 13401287 - 13471389 - 14591410 – 14551402 - 147114421455 - 1536 (ca.)1480 - 15351469 - 15341497 - 15541546155315591560156116111646165816721677
4
RegionIsraelRomeEastEastEast/WestBabylonEastWestWestWestEastEastEastWestWestEastEastEastEastWestEastWestWest, AfricaWest, AfricaWest, AfricaEastEastWestWest, RomeWest, RomeWestWest, RomeWest, RomeWest, SpainEast/GreekEastWestEastWestWestWestWestWestWestWest, FranceWest, FranceWestWestWestWestWestWestWestWestWestWestWestWest, RomeWest, EnglandWest, FranceWest, GenevaWest, the NetherlandsWest, EnglandWest, EnglandWest, EnglandEastWest, England
5
Claim to the Fathers/Authority-Yes: "it is become natural to all Jews immediately...to esteem these books to contain Divine doctrines"-Yes: "I went East and came to the place where these things were preached and done, I learned accurately the books of the Old Testament"Yes: "these are held sacred in the esteem of the Church catholic for the regulation of ecclesiastical discipline"Yes: "The Sages taught"----Yes: the catalogue is "according to ecclesiastical tradition" and the NT apocrypha is rejected by "the succession of ecclesiastical writers"Yes: "Study earnestly these only which we read openly in the Church. Far wiser and more pious than thyself were the Apostles, and the bishops of old time, the presidents of the Church who handed down these books"-Yes: the books are "according to the traditions of our forebears "-Yes: the books were "delivered to the Fathers" and which are "the books included in the Canon, and handed down, and accredited as divine"Yes: claims to be from the Apostles and written by Clement--Yes: "Now indeed we must treat of the divine Scriptures, what the universal Catholic Church accepts and what she ought to shun"-Yes: partially; because he speaks of "the Church reads Judith, Tobit, and the books of Maccabees, but does not admit them among the canonical Scriptures"Yes: "the church across the sea should be consulted to confirm this canon"Yes: "follow the judgment of the greater number of catholic churches"Yes: "we have received from our fathers that those books must be read in the Church"--Yes: the books are "from the records of the fathers...in accordance with the tradition of our ancestors...handed down to the churches of Christ."-Yes: Jerome, Augustine, Hilary, Ambrose are among those who are referred to for various sections.-Yes: "The order of the Old Testament, which the holy and Catholic Roman Church receives and honors"Yes: "the holy and catholic Roman Church accepts and honors, summarized by blessed pope Gelasius I with seventy bishops"Yes: "the Church of Christ honors and preaches" the Apocrypha "among the divine books"--Yes: "these are the books of the Old Testament, which the leaders of the churches have handed down to be read and received"---Yes: Jerome; concerning the Apocrypha: "the church reads them and permits them to be read "Yes: "The Church of Christ proclaims these and honors them as divine books, even though the Jews separate them as Apocrypha" and "the Fathers, from whom the authority of the truth of Scriptures comes down to us in most clear and certain succession"-Yes: "I follow Jerome, teacher of the Catholic Church" and "It is the well-known and undoubted tradition of the Church that this is the number of the books which are accepted into the canon of the Holy Scriptures; which enjoy such great authority among all men"Yes: Jerome-Yes: concerning the Apocrypha he says: "the catholic church has received these books in the category of holy scriptures" contra JeromeYes: Jerome; "the truth is known in the writings handed down by Catholic teachers"; Tobit, Judith and the books of Maccabees are "not of the canon for Jews, nor for Christians"Yes: Jerome and Gregory that "the Church reads the books of Judith, Tobias, and Maccabees, but it does not accept them among the canonical scriptures"Yes: "Jerome says in his Prologue to Judith, that their authority is judged less suitable to strengthen those things that come into dispute… "; Nicholas of Lyra; Thomas AquinasYes: Jerome; concerning the Apocrypha "the Church does not place them in the canon of its books" and "such books the Church accepts, allowing individuals to read them...Yet it obligates nobody necessarily to believe what is contained there"Yes: Jerome; concerning Judith and Tobit "Mother Church has no doubts about its truth"Yes: “the holy Roman church, founded on the words of our Lord and Saviour”Yes: JeromeYes: concerning the Apocrypha he says, "the Christian Church, on account of the authority of certain ancient scriptures which are read to make use of evidence from stories of this kind, reads these same scriptures with pious faith"Yes: Jerome about whom he says, "For the words as well of councils as of doctors are to be reduced to the correction of Jerome"Yes: concerning the Apocrypha he says, "In the Church they are not read publically, nor is any of them rewarded with authority"Yes: Jesus Christ and Apostles: "the written books, and the unwritten traditions which, received by the apostles from the mouth of Christ himself, or from the apostles themselves, the Holy Ghost dictating, have come down even unto us, transmitted as it were from hand to hand..."Yes: Jerome------Yes: Council of Laodicea and eminent theologians; concerning the Apocrypha, "For ancient custom, or rather the Catholic Church, which has delivered to us as genuine the Sacred Gospels and the other Books of Scripture, has undoubtedly delivered these also as parts of Scripture, and the denial of these is the rejection of those"-
6
CommentsPrologue 1-2, 8-10, 24-25. Mentions the threefold division of the OT as something which is closed.22 books, from Moses to Artaxerxes (the time of Esther, ~ 400 BC). Because only the five books are named, that's why the rest of the books are in the category of "highly implied".Discovered in 1873. This is identical to the list given by Epiphanius in Of Weights and Measures, 23.Perserved by Eusebius. Has the whole OT except Esther (whether intentionally excluding it or accendentially whether by Melito or by Eusebius). He also includes the Wisdom of Solomon.Discovered in 1740. Various dates have been given and locations. The traditional location is that it was from the East, originally in Greek and then translated into Latin in the mid-4th century.24 books; the tradition was complied in 200 A. D. but most probably came way before. From Baba Bathra 14Commentary on Ps. 1 in 220s as cited by Eusebius in Eccl. Hist., 6:25. There are 22 covenanted books of the OT. In Homilies on Joshua 7.1 preserved by Rufinus he gives the list of the 27 NT canon. He included some apocryphal works such as the additions to Daniel and supposed that the Jews removed them because it criticized the leadership. He relies on the LXX as the Scripture of the Church and inspired.An important MSS containing the whole OT, NT as well as some of the deuterocanon.An important MSS containing some of the OT, the whole NT as well as some deuterocanonical books as well as the Shepherd and the Epistle of Barnabas.This is not the table of contents of the Codex, but a list contained in the codex which was discovered by Beza. Within this Codex Claromontanus, four pages separate Hebrews from Philemon, which someone has used to copy a Latin catalogue of books. OT canon matches mostly the Council of Trent.He uses three categories of books: encovenanted/accepted/undisputed, disputed and spurious. He discusses only the NT. Eusebius' objective in writing Eccl. Hist. is about "which of the orthodox writiers in each period used any of the doubtful books, and what they said about the encovenanted and accepted Scriptures and what about those which are not such (3:3:3).Contained in Catechesis 4.33-36. The number of the OT books is 22 of the LXX. He rejects the apocryphal writings (Cate., IV:33).Has a pretty traditional OT canon (except inclusion of Baruch and Ep. Of Jer.). In the NT, it omits Rev. as was usual in the East in the mid-fourth century (e.g., Cyril of Jerusalem).The canon of the OT consists of 22 books as the Jewish canon except additions to Jer. There is dependence on Origen.Also called Cheltenham List containing a list of books.Athanasius' OT canon basically conforms to the Jewish one with the exception of Esther and inclusion of Baruch and Ep. Of Jer. There is a constant distinction between the "so-called apocrypha" and "the divinely inspired Scriptures"This is a document coming from the Syrian church. This is the first list to include the complete Apocrypha (even books not accepted by RCC or EO). It purports to be from the actual Apostles. This document has also textual problems, see Canon Lists, pp. 134-136 (See pp. 140-141 for the Syriac versions)This is the cousin of the great Gregory N. His OT canon contains 38 books (except Esther) corresponding to the modern enumeration.His OT canon has 22 books, but excludes Esther.The Decree of the Council of Rome (AD 382) on the Canon of Scripture during the reign of Pope Damasus I (AD 366–384) reads thus, according to the later ‘Gelasian Decree’. This council accepts the traditional Apocrypha, as well as the complete canon of the OT and NT.Epiphanius gives 3 canon lists. He reckons the OT books as 27 but says that the Jews reckon them as 22. The places and dates of his canon are as follows: (1) Panarion 8.6.1-4, 76.22.5 (ca. 376), (2) Of Measures and Weights 4-5, 22-23 (392). He speaks in Panion 8.6 of the divine books being from the time of genesis to the time of Esther.He translated the OT into Latin. He gives his list of OT canon three different times as the Jewish canon of 22 books with no additions not even the additions to Jeremiah.Augustine was at this time a priest in Hippo. The Breviarium Hipponense 36, was accepted by the Council of Carthage and reaffirmed at later councils, including a subsequent Council of Carthage in 419. The list comes from the Council of Carthage in 419.In his On Christian Doctrine, ii:8 he gives a list. Augustine's canon is the exact that of the Council of Trent! He counts 44 books for the OT because he includes the deuterocanonical books and separates conjoined books (including the Twelve).This council reaffirms the list in Breviarium Hipponense 36 (Council of Hippo, 393). The primary source of information about the third Council of Carthage comes from the Codex Canonum Ecclesiae Africanae, which presents a compilation of ordinances enacted by various church councils in Carthage during the fourth and fifth centuries. The list comes from the Council of Carthage in 419.An important MSS containing the whole OT and NT, as well as a lot of OT apocrypha/pseudepigrapha and 1-2 Clement. This MSS also includes Athanasius, Epistle of Marcellinus; Eusebius, Hypothesis of Psalms.This MSS contains the whole NT.Translator of some important Greek theological works into Latin. Makes a distinction between canonical, ecclesiastical and apocryphal. The latter may not be read at church. Rufinus expressed his view on the canon after the Councils of Hippo and Carthage.Innocent's canon is essential the same as Trent's (1546) and without any distinction just like Augustine.Cassiodorus was a Roman statesman, renowned scholar of antiquity, and writer serving in the administration of Theodoric the Great, king of the Ostrogoths. He refers to the "seventy-one canonical books" (as understood by Augustine). He mentions the canons of Jerome (bk. 1, ch. 12), Augustine (bk. 1, ch. 13) and the LXX (bk. 1, ch. 14).He numbers the OT books at 22.Has the deuterocanonicals too in the OT.The Decree of Gelasius (Decretum Gelasianum), which contains a list of canonical books, was so called because it was formerly ascribed to Pope Gelasius (in office from 492 to 496). Various recensions of the same decree were also ascribed to the earlier Pope Demasus (366-384) and the later Hormisdas (514-523), or to councils over which they presided. This list essentially reproduces the canon of the Council of Rome in 382 AD.Has the Jewish canon of 22 books and recognizes that the Jews exclude the Apocrypha, but "the Church of Christ honors and preaches among the divine books." He says that "There is a fourth section of the Old Testament among us, whose books are not in the Jewish canon."The list on the website is incomplete and lists only the rejected books. This list, which probably originated in the 7th century, and is transmitted in several manuscripts, reflects the view, widely held in the Greek Church at a later time, of the canon of 60 books (34 OT and 26 NT). There are only 26 NT books because the Revelation of John is missing. After the enumeration of the canonical books, there follows that of the writings 'outside the sixty' and the 'apocrypha'.He has a 22 book OT canon. His going over the Hebrew alphabet is similar to that of Epiphanius in Of Measures and Weights 4-5. He groups the OT in various Pentateuchs like Epiphanius: 5 x 5 + 2 = 27 booksThe canon list of Rabanus appears in his work De clericorum institutione, which is "an instructional manual for clerics to ensure they would have a proper foundation for the studies that would enable them to fulfill their ecclesiastical duties". He lists 45 OT books and includes the deuterocanonicals just like Trent. In total, he has 72 books.Nicephorus (Patriarch of Constantinople 806-815) drew up a Chronography reaching from Adam to the year of his death (829), to which he appended a canon catalogue, the origin of which has not been clearly settled, but which may perhaps be located in Jerusalem. Contains a lot more apocryphal books than here enlisted. It is essentially a catalogue of books not accepted by the church including Revelation. His list of OT books is 22 although Esther is not considered canonical.Hugh of St. Victor was a leading theologian of the twelfth century who had great influence on theologians of subsequent ages. He was the prior of the school of St. Victor from 1133 to 1141. George Tavard refers to him as ‘that greatest theological figure of the twelfth century.’ The OT has 22 books.Peter of Montboissier, was the abbot of the Benedictine abbey of Cluny. He has been honored as a saint but has never been formally canonized. He accepts the Jewish canon of the OT.This is a collection of biblical commentaries in the form of glosses. The glosses are drawn mostly from the Church Fathers, but the text was arranged by scholars during the twelfth century. The Glossa ordinaria was the official Biblical commentary used during the Middle Ages in all the theological centers for the training of theologians. Jerome is one of the primary influences. The Apocrypha is not for establishing doctrine or resolving controversy in the Church. The OT has 22 books and all apocryphal works said said to be non-canonical but nonetheless beneficial.Peter’s position on the canon was the same as Isidore and Rabanus Maurus. He wrote that the Hebrew canon consisted of 22 books, but that the Apocrypha have been received by the church: "The Church of Christ proclaims these and honors them as divine books, even though the Jews separate them as Apocrypha."He was a Medieval Scottish philosopher and theologian and one of the most influential religious thinkers of his time. OT books are 24.John of Salisbury (late 1110s – 25 October 1180), who described himself as Johannes Parvus ("John the Little"), was an English author, philosopher, educationalist, diplomat and bishop of Chartres. The canon of the OT consists of 22 books. In the NT, he adds the epistle to the Laodiceans!In his work Historia Scholastica, Peter aligned himself with Jerome in separating the Apocrypha from the canonical books of the Old Testament. The books of the OT are 22.In the Prologue to his commentary on the book of Joshua, Hugh gave a listing of the books of the Old Testament according to the Hebrew canon, indicating that the entirety of the Old Testament was comprised in the specific books listed. The books of the OT are 22. He also mentions the books in the Apocrypha and categorizing them as doubtful.Acknowledges Jerome's canon, but says that the books which he called Apocrypha have been accepted by the catholic church. Doesn't give an explicit list.He was one of the most highly regarded and influential theologians of the Middle Ages, surpassing even Thomas Aquinas in authority as a biblical commentator. He was included in the Glossa ordinaria. His running commentary on the entire Scriptures, Postillae perpetuae super totam Bibliam, was the first of its kind to be printed. He was a Hebrew scholar who endorsed the Hebrew canon according to the judgment of Jerome. He places the apocryphal works outside of the canon. In his Dialogues, Ockham wrote that the Church did not receive the books of the Apocrypha as canonical and were therefore not used for the confirmation of doctrines of the faith. He mentioned Judith, Tobit, Maccabees, Ecclesiasticus and Wisdom by name in this regard. He referred to the authority of Jerome and Gregory the Great as confirmation of this view. He rejects the Apocrypha as only for edification, but does not list the rest of the canon although at this time it was pretty much agreed uponAntoninus wrote that the Apocryphal books were not considered canonical by the Church and were therefore not authoritative for the confirmation of doctrines of the faith. He numbered the canonical books of the Old Testament at 22, thereby indicating that he followed the Hebrew canon and cited Jerome and Nicholas of Lyra as authorities for his position.Tostado taught that the books of the Apocrypha were non-canonical and, as such, were not authoritative for establishing points of doctrine. He also affirmed that the Church allowed the books to be read and studied for the purpose of edification. The church " obligates nobody necessarily to believe what is contained" in the Apocrypha. He makes a fine distinction between books in Holy Scripture and books in the Canon. The Church reads the Apocrypha and counts them among her books, but they're not canonical.In his Commentary on Genesis, Denys commented on the books of the canon. He gave a list of the canonical books of the Old Testament repeating Jerome’s Prologue to the book of Kings in which he listed the canonical Old Testament books as corresponding to the Hebrew canon and comprising 22 in number.The Council of Florence is the seventeenth ecumenical council recognized by the Catholic Church, held between 1431 and 1449. It was convoked as the Council of Basel by Pope Martin V shortly before his death in February 1431. The canon lists is the same as Trent's.Jacobus Faber Stapulensis was a sixteenth century theologian and Doctor at the University of Paris. In referring to the Apocrypha he followed Jerome in stating that those particular books were not considered part of the canon and consequently did not possess the authority of the canonical Scriptures, though they were useful for the edification of believers.Jean Driedo was a sixteenth century theologian and member of the faculty of the Catholic University at Louvain who condemned Luther’s teachings in 1519. He stated that the Apocryphal books were not considered part of the Old Testament canon. The Church used them for the purposes of edification but they did not carry the same authority as the canonical books, which alone were used for the confirmation of the doctrines of the faith.He is the one who privately interrogated Luther in 1518. He was a defender of the authority of the Pope. Cajetan wrote a commentary on all the canonical books of the Old Testament which he dedicated to the pope. The Apocrypha is not canonical following the precedent of Jerome. He held other statements of councils or doctors to be corrected by Jerome! They can only be called canonical for edification.In his book, The Examination of Those Who Were to Be Ordained for the Sacred Ministry of the Church, John Ferus listed the books of which he says comprised the Old Testament canon. He included the books of the Apocrypha among that list. In so doing he made a distinction between those that were truly canonical and authoritative and the Apocrypha which he said was not canonical but was useful for private reading in one’s own home.Session 4, on 8 April 1546. This is the dogmatic and universal canonization of the apocryphal books for the Roman Catholic Church. An anathema is placed upon those who do not accept this canon: "But if any one receive not, as sacred and canonical, these same books entire with all their parts, as they have been used to be read in the Catholic Church, and as they are contained in the old Latin vulgate edition; and knowingly and deliberately despise the traditions aforesaid; let him be anathema."Beliefs of the Anglican Church written under the direction of Thomas Cranmer. Lists the Apocryphal books and recommends them for edification, but not doctrine following Jerome.Drawn up by John Calvin. Distinguishes between the canonical books and the ecclesiastical books, but does not name which ecclesiastical books are meant.Includes the Apocrypha in a section between the OT and NT.Drawn up by Guide de Bres and represents Reformed churches adhering to the Three Forms of Unity. Article 4 lists the traditional Protestant canon and article 6 lists the apocrypha and says that they're useful to read.The original KJV includes the books of the Apocrypha in a section between the OT and NT called "The Bookes called Apocrypha."Westminster Confession of Faith for the Presbyterians. The Apocrypha is not in the Canon and thus should be treated as merely a human work.Savoy Declaration of Faith for the English Congregationalists. The Apocrypha is not in the Canon and thus should be treated as merely a human work.Eastern orthodox position. A Synod of Eastern Orthodox Churches was called in Jerusalem in 1672 to refute the position of Cyril Lucaris, Patriarch of Constantinople, who had published a Confession in which he attempted to express Orthodox beliefs in terms of the predestinarian beliefs of Calvinism.The Second London Baptist Confession of Faith for the English Particular Baptists. The Apocrypha is not in the Canon and thus should be treated as merely a human work.
7
-
8
GenesisThe text does not deal with the Law, but it was always undisputedUndisputed at this point of timeUndisputed at this point of timeUndisputed at this point of timeUndisputed at this point of time
9
Exodus
10
Leviticus
11
Numbers
12
Deuteronomy
13
Joshua
14
Judges"Judges and Ruth, among them in one book""a seventh of Judges and Ruth""Then they add Sopthim, that is, the book of Judges, and to it they join Ruth, because the story is narrated as having happened in the days of the Judges.""the book of Judges together with Ruth"probably included under the title "Octateuch ""Ruth is joined on to Judges""Judges with which they place the book of Ruth"
15
Ruth"the book of Judges, including Ruth, counted as seventh"
16
1 SamuelHe probably includes these books under "Kings (in two books)" where 1-2 Sam. were considered one as well as 1-2 Kings were considered one book.
17
2 Samuel
18
1 Kings
19
2 Kings
20
1 Chronicles
21
2 Chronicles
22
Ezra"Desdra: Esdras A. Dadesdra: Esdras B."included under 'Esdras i, ii, in one, Ezra, that is "Helper"'"Esdras B""Esdras B""First and Second Ezra""words of the days of Esdras in the eleventh""First and Second Esdras, likewise as one""two of Ezra" or "two of Esdras""first Esdras, then the second""Last you have Esdras""twenty-fifth Esdras I, twenty-sixth Esdras II""eighth Ezra, which is also itself divided into two books similarly among Greeks and Latins""Of Ezra, two books""two books of Esdras""Esdras B""two books of Ezra, which the Hebrews reckon one""three books of Ezra (we add there that one of them is very apocryphal…)""the first book of Esdras"
23
Nehemiahprobably subsumed under "of Esdras"probably subsumed under "of Esdras"
24
Estheromission may be accendential either by Melito or Eusebius"not received as canonical but having been appointed by our fathers to be read...""Some include Esther in addition to these."Seeing he ends his poem with "If there is any outside of these, they are not among the genuine", it is most probable that he rejected Esther."Further, it should be known that in the book of Esther, only those words are in the canon up to that place where we have inserted: the end of the book of Esther, as far as it is in Hebrew."
25
Job"Job, which some thought to be the composition of Josephus"
26
Psalm"four books containing hymns to God, and precepts for the conduct of human life""151 Psalms of David""Of David Psalms, 151""Book of One-Hundred-and-Fifty-One Psalms"
27
Proverbs"Proverbs which is also Wisdom" "Of Solomon"; see commentsee comment"Of Solomon, five books""three books of Solomon, viz., Proverbs, Song of Songs, and Ecclesiastes""Solomon gave three books to the churches, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, and Song of Songs"
28
Ecclesiastes
29
Song of Songs
30
Isaiahprobably included under the "Prophets" or "Prophecies"
31
Jeremiah"Jeremiah, with Lamentations and the epistle in one"Jeremiah probably includes Lamentations, Baruch, and the Epistles of Jeremiah"Jeremiah one, including Baruch and Lamentations and the Epistle""Jeremiah and Baruch, Lamentations and the Epistle""then Jeremiah with Baruch, Lamentations and the Epistle, one book""And the sympathetic Jeremiah""Jeremiah, the one called from infancy""twenty-second Jeremiah the prophet with the Lamentations and Epistles, both his own and Baruch's""So also five books are considered by
many to be doubled:...Jeremiah with Cinoth, that is, his Lamentations."		"Jeremiah""The Book of Jeremiah, with Cinoth, i.e., his Lamentations""Jeremiah one book
with Cinoth i.e. his lamentations"
32
Lamentationsprobably subsumed under Jer.
33
Ezekiel
34
Danielprobably includes the additions because he uses the LXX"Likewise in Daniel, only those words are in the canon up to that place where we have inserted: The prophet Daniel ends. What follows afterward is not in the canon."
35
Hosea"the Twelve prophets"The Twelve are not explicitly mentioned but this is probably an unintentional omission either by Origen or Eusebius.
36
Joel
37
Amos
38
Obadiah
39
Jonah
40
Micah
41
Nahum
42
Habakkuk
43
Zephaniah
44
Haggai
45
Zechariah
46
Malachi
47
-
48
1 Esdras / 3 Ezra / Esdras Aunclarity on the discussion about the identification of the names of this book"Esdras A""Esdras A"3 Ezra"three books of Ezra (we add there that one of them is very apocryphal…)"the Esdras referred to is simply the book of Ezra"The Third Book of Esdras""the third book of Esdras"
49
2 Esdras / 4 Ezra / Esdras B4 Ezra"The Fourth Book of Esdras"
50
2 Esdras / Ezra-Nehemiah
51
1 Maccabees"And outside of these [books enlisted] are the Maccabees" Jerome has seen a Hebrew copy of it (Pref. to Kings)is in a fourth section and is acknowledged to be rejected by the Jews"The Church of Christ proclaims these and honors them as divine books, even though the Jews separate them as Apocrypha"
52
2 Maccabees
53
3 Maccabeesaccedential omission probably
54
4 Maccabees
55
Tobit "the Jews do not use… the Churches use Tobias" (To Africanus, 13)"to some it seems good to add Tobit and Judith in order to enumerate twenty-four books"; see comment"not received as canonical but having been appointed by our fathers to be read to those just approaching and wishing to be instructed in the word of godliness""the Church reads Judith, Tobit, and the books of Maccabees, but does not admit them among the canonical Scriptures""one book of Tobias omitted by others"is in a fourth section and is acknowledged to be rejected by the Jews"The Church of Christ proclaims these and honors them as divine books, even though the Jews separate them as Apocrypha"
56
Judith A horizontal stroke appears before its listing.Some texts include "of Judith, one"
57
Additions to Esther"Further, it should be known that in the book of Esther, only those words are in the canon up to that place where we have inserted: the end of the book of Esther, as far as it is in Hebrew."
58
Additions to Daniel (Bel & Dragon, Three Children, Susanna)acknowledges that it is only contained in the LXX"Likewise in Daniel, only those words are in the canon up to that place where we have inserted: The prophet Daniel ends. What follows afterward is not in the canon."based on reliance on the Vulgate version of Daniel which contains these additionsbased on reliance on the Vulgate version of Daniel which contains these additions
59
Odes of Solomon"Odes"
60
Psalms of SolomonNot included in the text, but the table of contents of the MSS.
61
Wisdom of Solomon"written by the friends of Solomon in his honor"see comment"not received as canonical but having been appointed by our fathers to be read to those just approaching and wishing to be instructed in the word of godliness"see commentThe Jews dispute "Wisdom of Sirach and the one of Solomon"; see comment"Of Solomon, five books"believes that they're written by ben Sirach. See commentsee commentis in a fourth section and is acknowledged to be rejected by the Jews"These are virtuous and noble, but are not counted nor were they placed in the ark."Fourth is the book of Wisdom, which almost all hold that Philo of Alexandria, a most learned Jew, wrote.""The Church of Christ proclaims these and honors them as divine books, even though the Jews separate them as Apocrypha"
62
Ecclesiasticus/Sirachsee comment
63
Baruchmay be included with Jeremiahprobably included under Jeremiah"of Jeremiah one, including Baruch and Lamentations and the Epistle""Jeremiah and Baruch, Lamentations and the Epistle""Jeremiah with Baruch, Lamentations and the Epistle, one book"see comment"twenty-second Jeremiah the prophet with the Lamentations and Epistles, both his own and Baruch's"; see commentprobably included under "Jeremiah"
64
Letter of Jeremiah"Jeremiah, with Lamentations and the epistle in one""Jeremiah with Lamentations and the Epistle"see comment
65
Prayer of Manasseh
66
Psalm 151Some manuscripts have "of the Maccabees, three" instead of "four"
67
Jubilees
68
Enoch
69
The Assumption of Moses
70
-
71
Matthewthe fragment begins its listing of texts with "The third book of the Gospel is that according to Luke"Undisputed at this point of timeUndisputed at this point of timeUndisputed at this point of timeUndisputed at this point of timeUndisputed at this point of timeUndisputed at this point of timeUndisputed at this point of timeUndisputed at this point of timeUndisputed at this point of timeUndisputed at this point of timeUndisputed at this point of timeUndisputed at this point of timeUndisputed at this point of timeUndisputed at this point of timeUndisputed at this point of time
72
Mark
73
Luke
74
John
75
Acts
76
Romans"Paul’s fourteen epistles are well known and undisputed" (3.3.5)
77
1 Corinthians
78
2 Corinthians
79
Galatians
80
Ephesians
81
Philippians
82
Colossians
83
1 Thessalonians
84
2 ThessaloniansNot found among the remaining fragments, though it was surely included.
85
1 Timothy
86
2 Timothy
87
Titus
88
Philemon
89
Hebrews"some have rejected the Epistle to the Hebrews" (see 3.3.5, 3.38), but he's doesn't dispute it"Some call that to the Hebrews spurious, but they say it not well; for the grace is genuine."places this oustide of "the thirteen epistles of St Paul"; see comment
90
Jamesaffirmed in comm. on Josh. 7.1although its authenticity has been disputed, yet it is used in most churches (see 2.23.25)
91
1 PeterA horizontal stroke appears before its listing.
92
2 Peteraffirmed in comm. on Josh. 7.1"we have learned that his extant second Epistle does not belong to the canon; yet, as it has appeared profitable to many, it has been used with the other Scriptures" (3.3.1)The words "una sola" after "Iohannis III" and "Petri II" appear in the Cheltenham manuscript, but not in the manuscript of St. Gall.
93
1 John"Moreover, the Epistle of Jude and two of the above-mentioned (or, bearing the name of) John are counted (or, used) in the catholic [Church]"
94
2 JohnJohn "left also an epistle of very few lines; perhaps also a second and third; but not all consider them genuine"The words "una sola" after "Iohannis III" and "Petri II" appear in the Cheltenham manuscript, but not in the manuscript of St. Gall.Not found among the remaining fragments, though it was surely included.
95
3 John
96
Judeaffirmed in comm. on Josh. 7.1although its authenticity has been disputed, yet it is used in most churches (see 2.23.25)"of the apostle Judas the Zealot one letter"
97
Revelation"the blessed apostle Paul himself, following the example of his predecessor John, writes by name to only seven churches"codex cut shortalthough it belongs among the accepted writings, some people dispute it (see 3.25.2-4)see commentAfter the letters of Paul and before the letters of Clement, the Ethiopic has the Apocalypse of John."And the Apocalypse of John again. Some accept, but the majority indeed. Say it is spurious."see comment
98
-
99
1 Clement
100
2 Clement