Project rubric 2015
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
View only
 
 
Still loading...
ABCDEF
1
Topic
2
Studentsname of presentation
3
overall project (5pts)Collaboration (5pts) English Standards (5pts)
Presentation of Knowledge and Ideas (20 pts)Information required on project (5pts/piece of info)
4
overall criteria Overall apparent quality of the project (pictures, fonts, colors).Based on a combination of what was observed in class, by revision history, and/or by overall quality of the work.Technical writing criteria - correctly used scientific vocab, and proper spelling and grammarUsually broken down by the information required by the project information. (see next column)
5
1 not acceptableThe project is not acceptable given the time students had in class. No pictures that enhance the project. Did not share properly with each other and/or the teacher. Students were usually off task. Project was not complete by due date.Lack of scientific vocabulary or incorrect use of terms. Several spelling or grammar issues. Uses slang language. No References. Information and evidence lack key points or contain false or incomplete details. Background
6
2 poorMost of the project is NOT easy to read OR there is NO color OR appears messy/thrown together. No pictures that enhance the project. Had to be asked to share with each other or the teacher. Students were often not on task.Uses some relevant scientific vocabulary correctly. Uses slang language OR spelling or grammar issues. Only one reference OR incomplete references.Presents mostly correct information and evidence, HOWEVER several facts are missing OR incomplete in detail. Wiki-report - material is at middle school level, not high school.Clarity
7
3 needs improvement There are parts of the project not easy to read OR very little color OR appears a little messy/thrown together. No pictures that enhance the project. Contast issues, or other avoidable presentation errors. Properly shared with each other and with the teacher. Students had to be redirected to stay on task OR it is questionable on how on task they were from the quality of the work.Correctly applies and uses some relevant scientific vocabulary. Uses slang language OR spelling or grammar issues. References available.Presents 75% or more correct OR complete information and evidence (some details are lacking).
But the organization is difficult for listeners to follow.
Information
8
4 good Project is neat, colorful and easy to read. Everything is NOT typed out or written VERY neatly. Maybe some minor contrast issues or other avoidable presentation errors.Properly shared with each other and with the teacher. Students were usually on task. Correctly applies and uses most relevant scientific vocabulary, HOWEVER does not completely explain new terms. Uses proper English terms. References Available.Presents 85% or more correct OR complete info (lacking a few details) Evidence clearly and logically such that listeners can follow the reasoning and organization. Bonus - creativity, difficulty of subject
9
5 excellent Project is neat, colorful and easy to read. Everything is typed out or written VERY neatly.Properly shared with each other and with the teacher. Group members respect each other. Students excelled at staying on task. Group worked well together. Correctly applies and uses all relevant scientific vocabulary. Uses proper English terms. References appear complete and accurate.Presents 100% correct and complete information and evidence clearly , concisely, and logically such that listeners can follow the reasoning and organization.
10
totals
11
total points earned
12
/30
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Loading...
 
 
 
project
writing rubric