| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Study | Condition_definition | Experimental.Context | Subject.type | N_small | N_large | Stimuli.type | No..of.items | Used.font.sizes | Selected.font.sizes | Font.size.comparison | Absolute.font.size.difference | Experiment.design | Study.time | JOL.type | Fluency.measure | Other.manipulations | Test.format | Belief.measure | Belief_instruction | Article.Type | Publication.status | gJOL | SEgJOL | Notes | ||
2 | Rhodes & Castel-2008-1 | laboratory | undergrad | 20 | 20 | UWL | 42 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 5s | immediate | no | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.79 | 0.242899156 | |||||
3 | Rhodes & Castel-2008-2 | laboratory | undergrad | 28 | 28 | UWL | 84 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 5s | immediate | no | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.38 | 0.07745966692 | |||||
4 | Rhodes & Castel-2008-3 | laboratory | undergrad | 28 | 28 | RWP, UWP | 96 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 5s | immediate | no | related vs. unrelated pair | cued recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.24 | 0.1048808848 | ||||
5 | Rhodes & Castel-2008-4 | laboratory | undergrad | 54 | 54 | UWL | 42 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 5s | immediate | no | free recall | post-recall questionnaire | no | journal article | published | 0.2 | 0.07071067812 | warning about font size illusion | ||||
6 | Rhodes & Castel-2008-5 | laboratory | undergrad | 18 | 18 | UWL | 42 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 5s | immediate | no | cycle 1 vs. cycle 2 | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.86 | 0.3361547263 | JOF was converted to JOL | |||
7 | Rhodes & Castel-2008-6-standard format | laboratory | undergrad | 20 | 20 | UWL | 54 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 5s | immediate | no | alternating vs. standard format | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.63 | 0.1341640786 | only data for standard format are included | |||
8 | Kornell et al.-2011-1 | online | Mturk participants | 83 | 83 | UWL | 36 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | self-paced | immediate | no | single vs. two study trials | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.44 | 0.07071067812 | data were collapsed across the first and second study trials because there was no interaction reported | |||
9 | Kornell et al.-2011-2 | online | Mturk participants | 84 | 84 | UWL | 36 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | self-paced | immediate | no | single vs. four study trials | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.47 | 0.08366600265 | only data for the first trial were included because there was an interaction between study trial and font size | |||
10 | Miele et al.-2011-2 | laboratory | undergrad | 41 | 41 | UWL | 26 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 4s | immediate | no | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.14 | 0.07745966692 | |||||
11 | Mcdonough & Gallo-2012-1 | laboratory | undergrad | 36 | 36 | UWL | 192 | 25, 125 | 25, 125 | intermediate | large | WS | 2s | immediate | no | word type | recognition | no | no | journal article | published | 0.3474090293 | 0.2374735809 | every studied word was presented twice; JOLs were ratings from the first presentation; words presented in both large and small fonts were excluded from the standard recognition results (hits) | |||
12 | Mcdonough & Gallo-2012-2-size | size-oriented | laboratory | undergrad | 40 | 40 | UWL | 192 | 25, 125 | 25, 125 | intermediate | large | WS | 2s | immediate | no | recognition | no | no | journal article | published | 0.4353711916 | 0.2262403047 | every studied word was presented twice; JOLs were ratings from the first presentation; words presented in both large and small fonts were excluded from the standard recognition results (hits) | |||
13 | Mcdonough & Gallo-2012-2-color | color-oriented | laboratory | undergrad | 40 | 40 | UWL | 192 | 25, 125 | 25, 125 | intermediate | large | WS | 2s | immediate | no | recognition | no | no | journal article | published | 1.019766915 | 0.2376962947 | every studied word was presented twice; JOLs were ratings from the first presentation; words presented in both large and small fonts were excluded from the standard recognition results (hits) | |||
14 | Mcdonough & Gallo-2012-3-CR | criterion recollection | laboratory | undergrad | 32 | 32 | UWL | 144 | 25, 125 | 25, 125 | intermediate | large | WS | 2s | immediate | no | other | no | no | journal article | published | 0.5210991123 | 0.2542074738 | every studied word was presented twice; JOLs were ratings from the first presentation; memory data was not included becase the criterial recollection test administered included both "large" and "small" tests, which are not comparable to standard memory tests | |||
15 | Mcdonough & Gallo-2012-3-2AFC | 2AFC | laboratory | undergrad | 32 | 32 | UWL | 144 | 25, 125 | 25, 125 | intermediate | large | WS | 2s | immediate | no | other | no | no | journal article | published | 0.7352458187 | 0.2583085971 | every studied word was presented twice; JOLs were ratings from the first presentation; memory data was not included becase the 2FAC test administered included both "large" and "small" tests, which are not comparable to standard memory tests | |||
16 | Soderstrom-2012-3 | laboratory | undergrad | 44 | 44 | UWL | 40 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 5s | immediate | no | free recall | no | no | thesis | unpublished | 1.63 | 0.2664582519 | JOLs were made on a 3-point scale | ||||
17 | Susser et al.-2013-1-mixed | mixed-list | laboratory | undergrad | 20 | 20 | UWL | 40 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 5s | immediate | no | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.44 | 0.1183215957 | ||||
18 | Susser et al.-2013-1-pure | pure-list | laboratory | undergrad | 19 | 19 | UWL | 40 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | BS | 5s | immediate | no | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | -0.3843955678 | 0.3274253622 | ||||
19 | Mueller et al.-2014-1-JOL | immediate JOL | laboratory | undergrad | 27 | 27 | UWL | 72 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 5s | immediate | no | word vs. non-word | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.31 | 0.07745966692 | participants were not instructed to recall non-words | ||
20 | Mueller et al.-2014-2-fixed | limited study time | laboratory | undergrad | 30 | 30 | UWL | 72 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 5s | immediate | no | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.55 | 0.1048808848 | ||||
21 | Mueller et al.-2014-2-self paced | self-paced | laboratory | undergrad | 30 | 30 | UWL | 72 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | self-paced | immediate | study time | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.4 | 0.1140175425 | ||||
22 | Mueller et al.-2014-4-immediate JOL | immediate JOL | laboratory | undergrad | 30 | 30 | UWL | 72 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 5s | immediate | no | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.39 | 0.1224744871 | ||||
23 | Ball et al.-2014-2 | laboratory | undergrad | 29 | 29 | related sentence | 40 | 24, 48 | 24, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | self-paced | immediate | study time | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | -0.36 | 0.264731484 | g converted from d | ||||
24 | Hu et al.-2015-1-learner | learner group | laboratory | undergrad | 20 | 20 | UWL | 40 | 9, 70 | 9, 70 | very small, intermediate | medium | WS | 4s | immediate | no | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.29 | 0.1183215957 | observer group's data were not included | |||
25 | Hu et al.-2015-2 | laboratory | undergrad | 25 | 25 | UWL | 40 | 9, 70 | 9, 70 | very small, intermediate | medium | WS | 4s | immediate | no | free recall | pre-study global differentiated predictions | no | journal article | published | 0.6039268152 | 0.1186575598 | |||||
26 | Price et al.-2016-1 | laboratory | undergrad, older adult | 88 | 88 | UWP | 240 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 5s | immediate | no | regular vs. italic vs. bold font styles | cued recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.1251722225 | 0.1509032284 | data were collapsed across regular, bold, italic font styles | |||
27 | Park-2015 | laboratory | undergrad | 66 | 66 | UWL | 32 | 8, 10, 12, 14, 46, 48, 50, 52, 82, 84, 86, 88, 120, 122, 124, 126 | 8, 82 | very small, intermediate | medium | WS | 4s | immediate | no | word length | free recall | no | no | thesis | unpublished | 0.5289922053 | 0.1770960272 | only data for 8pt and 82pt were included | |||
28 | Hu et al.-2016-1-delayed | delayed JOL | laboratory | undergrad | 28 | 28 | UWP | 48 | 9, 70 | 9, 70 | very small, intermediate | medium | WS | 4s | delayed | no | cued recall | no | no | journal article | published | -0.00590541413 | 0.1336824987 | only data for delayed JOL condition were included | |||
29 | Hu et al.-2016-2-delayed | delayed JOL | laboratory | undergrad | 34 | 34 | UWP | 48 | 9, 70 | 9, 70 | very small, intermediate | medium | WS | 4s | delayed | no | cued recall | no | no | journal article | published | -0.01048682869 | 0.0900352427 | only data for delayed JOL condition were included | |||
30 | Hu et al.-2016-3-immediate | immediate-JOL | laboratory | undergrad | 25 | 25 | UWP | 48 | 9, 70 | 9, 70 | very small, intermediate | medium | WS | 4s | immediate | no | cued recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.0833691975 | 0.07517073702 | data for immediate JOL conditino instead of delayed JOL condition was included because a SDT was added between study and delayed JOL to increase familiarity of small font size | |||
31 | Price & Harrison-2017-2 | laboratory | undergrad | 156 | 156 | RWP, UWP | 240 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 5s | immediate | no | order of JOL type | cued recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.1604583717 | 0.1134097609 | prestudy JOL also administered | |||
32 | Price & Harrison-2017-3 | laboratory | undergrad | 74 | 74 | RWP, UWP | 240 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 5s | immediate | no | information vs. no information | cued recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.1260640684 | 0.1645621971 | prestudy JOL also administered | |||
33 | Blake-2018-2-congruent framing | large-easier-to-learn instruction | online | Mturk participants | 28 | 28 | UWL | 90 | 16, 32, 48 | 16, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 3s | immediate | no | value-framing | free recall | no | intuitive | journal article | published | 0.5375597865 | 0.272045337 | only data for 16pt and 48pt are included | ||
34 | Blake-2018-2-incongruent framing | small-easier-to-learn instruction | online | Mturk participants | 28 | 28 | UWL | 90 | 16, 32, 48 | 16, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 3s | immediate | no | value-framing | free recall | no | counterintuitive | journal article | published | -0.2695739271 | 0.2684723666 | only data for 16pt and 48pt are included | ||
35 | Blake-2018-2-control | control | online | Mturk participants | 28 | 28 | UWL | 90 | 16, 32, 48 | 16, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 3s | immediate | no | value-framing | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.3037383178 | 0.2687978689 | only data for 16pt and 48pt are included | ||
36 | Blake & Castel-2018-1A | laboratory | undergrad | 88 | 88 | UWL | 42 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 4s | immediate | no | low vs. medium vs. high intensity of instruction | free recall | post-recall questionnaire | no | journal article | published | 0.6622513382 | 0.1548329088 | ||||
37 | Blake & Castel-2018-1B | online | Mturk participants | 78 | 78 | UWL | 42 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 4s | immediate | no | low vs. medium vs. high intensity of instruction | free recall | post-recall questionnaire | no | journal article | published | 0.1153888573 | 0.1602613509 | ||||
38 | Blake & Castel-2018-2-congruent framing | large-easier-to-learn instruction | online | Mturk participants | 31 | 31 | UWL | 42 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 4s | immediate | no | free recall | post-recall questionnaire | intuitive | journal article | published | 0.3430065963 | 0.2558611885 | ||||
39 | Blake & Castel-2018-2-incongruent framing | small-easier-to-learn instruction | online | Mturk participants | 31 | 31 | UWL | 42 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 4s | immediate | no | free recall | post-recall questionnaire | counterintuitive | journal article | published | 0.1380582474 | 0.2543026531 | ||||
40 | Luna, Martín-Luengo et al.-2018-1 | laboratory | undergrad | 20 | 20 | UWL | 34 | 40, 40-bold, 74 | 40, 74 | intermediate | small | WS | 5s | immediate | no | recognition | no | no | journal article | published | 0.35 | 0.0894427191 | hit rates were used; words were eveny divided into small, large, bold fonts | ||||
41 | Luna, Martín-Luengo et al.-2018-2 | laboratory | undergrad | 23 | 23 | UWP | 98 | 30, 30-bold, 74 | 30, 74 | intermediate | medium | WS | 5s | immediate | no | cued recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.3 | 0.158113883 | words were eveny divided into small, large, bold fonts; JOL followed by restudy decisions | ||||
42 | Luna, Martín-Luengo et al.-2018-3 | laboratory | undergrad | 24 | 24 | UWL | 64 | 18, 18-bold, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 3s | immediate | no | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.86 | 0.2323790008 | words were eveny divided into small, large, bold fonts; JOL followed by restudy decisions | ||||
43 | Luna, Martín-Luengo et al.-2018-4 | laboratory | undergrad | 32 | 32 | UWL | 44 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 3s | immediate | no | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.28 | 0.0894427191 | bold font size removed; JOL followed by restudy decisions | ||||
44 | Luna, Martín-Luengo et al.-2018-5 | laboratory | undergrad | 24 | 24 | UWP | 98 | 30, 30-bold, 74 | 30, 74 | intermediate | medium | WS | 5s | immediate | no | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.32 | 0.1095445115 | words were eveny divided into small, large, bold fonts; delayed restudy decisions with only cues presented | ||||
45 | Luna, Martín-Luengo et al.-2018-6 | laboratory | undergrad | 22 | 22 | UWP | 98 | 30, 30-bold, 74 | 30, 74 | intermediate | medium | WS | 5s | delayed | no | cued recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.37 | 0.1516575089 | words were eveny divided into small, large, bold fonts; delayed JOL and restudy decisions with only cues presented | ||||
46 | Luna, Martín-Luengo et al.-2018-7 | laboratory | undergrad | 13 | 13 | UWL | 64 | 18, 18-bold, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 3s | delayed | no | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.26 | 0.1048808848 | words were eveny divided into small, large, bold fonts; JOL and restudy decision delayed after four math problems (on average 25s) following each word, without re-presenting the word | ||||
47 | Luna, Martín-Luengo et al.-2018-8 | laboratory | undergrad | 29 | 29 | UWL | 44 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 3s | delayed | no | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.28 | 0.09486832981 | bold font size removed; JOL and restudy decision delayed after four math problems (on average 54s) following each word, without re-presenting the word | ||||
48 | Luna, Martín-Luengo et al.-2018-9 | laboratory | undergrad | 26 | 26 | UWL | 44 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 3s | delayed | no | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.19 | 0.0632455532 | bold font size removed; JOL and restudy decision delayed after four math problems (on average 58s) following each word, without re-presenting the word | ||||
49 | Halamish-2018-1 | laboratory | undergrad | 32 | 32 | UWL | 48 | 5, 18, 48 | 5, 48 | very small, intermediate | medium | WS | 5s | immediate | no | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.7066579427 | 0.1897738506 | only data for 5 pt and 48pt were included; retention interval: 5 min | ||||
50 | Halamish-2018-2 | laboratory | undergrad | 30 | 30 | UWL | 48 | 5, 18, 48 | 5, 48 | very small, intermediate | medium | WS | 5s | immediate | no | recognition | no | no | journal article | published | 0.6401695357 | 0.1831989388 | only data for 5 pt and 48pt were included; retention interval: 2-5 hours | ||||
51 | Halamish-2018-3 | laboratory | undergrad | 30 | 30 | UWL | 48 | 5, 18, 48 | 5, 48 | very small, intermediate | medium | WS | 0.5s | immediate | no | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.8391262572 | 0.2488243294 | only data for 5 pt and 48pt were included; retention interval: 10s | ||||
52 | Halamish-2018-4 | laboratory | undergrad | 42 | 42 | UWL | 48 | 5, 18, 48 | 5, 48 | very small, intermediate | medium | WS | 0.5s | immediate | no | recognition | no | no | journal article | published | 0.8231059455 | 0.2080891821 | only data for 5 pt and 48pt were included; retention interval: 10s | ||||
53 | Halamish-2018-11A | laboratory | undergrad | 72 | 72 | UWL | 48 | 5, 18, 48 | 5, 48 | very small, intermediate | medium | WS | 0.5s | immediate | no | recognition | no | no | journal article | published | 0.7109731014 | 0.1550288271 | only data for 5 pt and 48pt were included; retention interval: 10s | ||||
54 | Halamish et al.-2018 | laboratory | elementary school children | 120 | 120 | UWL | 24 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 8s | immediate | no | first vs. fifth vs. sixth grades | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.3736795587 | 0.0913026549 | JOLs were made on a child-friendly five-point scale | |||
55 | Undorf, Söllner et al.-2018-1 | laboratory | undergrad | 53 | 53 | UWL | 60 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 3s | immediate | no | number of study presentation | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.3950158962 | 0.06937924731 | only JOLs for the last presentation was included | |||
56 | Undorf, Söllner et al.-2018-3 | laboratory | undergrad | 50 | 50 | UWL | 68 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 3s | immediate | no | number of study presentation, concreteness, emotion | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.2650017859 | 0.06298468441 | only JOLs for the last presentation was included | |||
57 | Undorf, Söllner et al.-2018-4 | laboratory | undergrad | 48 | 48 | UWL | 68 | 18, 21, 24, 27, 31, 36, 41, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 3s | immediate | no | concreteness, emotion | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.2817752922 | 0.08075211043 | only data for 18pt and 48pt were included | |||
58 | Yang et al.-2018-1 | laboratory | undergrad | 28 | 28 | UWL | 100 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | self-paced | immediate | continuous identification task | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.267253863 | 0.06992838707 | |||||
59 | Yang et al.-2018-3 | laboratory | undergrad | 29 | 29 | UWL | 100 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | self-paced | immediate | continuous identification task | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.3825314419 | 0.265003746 | an observation task added between study and test | ||||
60 | Su et al.-2018-1 | laboratory | undergrad | 44 | 44 | UWL | 40 | 9, 70 | 9, 70 | very small, intermediate | medium | WS | self-paced | immediate | study time | free recall | ease of reading or each word | no | journal article | published | 0.3768318907 | 0.1135589174 | |||||
61 | Su et al.-2018-2a | laboratory | undergrad | 30 | 30 | UWL | 40 | 9, 70 | 9, 70 | very small, intermediate | medium | WS | self-paced | immediate | study time | free recall | pre-study global differentiated predictions; ease of reading or each word | no | journal article | published | 0.5717938939 | 0.1713122595 | |||||
62 | Su et al.-2018-2b | laboratory | undergrad | 30 | 30 | UWL | 40 | 9, 70 | 9, 70 | very small, intermediate | medium | WS | 5s | immediate | no | free recall | pre-study global differentiated predictions; ease of reading or each word | no | journal article | published | 0.7113068027 | 0.1996417858 | ease of reading ratings administered after study phase | ||||
63 | Dalot-2018 | laboratory | undergrad | 60 | 60 | UWL | 64 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 5s | immediate | no | free recall | no | no | thesis | unpublished | 0.2566833705 | 0.1833244659 | |||||
64 | Magoulas-2018 | laboratory | undergrad | 60 | 60 | UWL | 20 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 2s | immediate | no | English vs. Greek groups | free recall | pre-study global differentiated predictions; post-study global differentiated predictions | no | thesis | unpublished | 0.5428230105 | 0.09990874421 | ||||
65 | Double-2019-1-JOL | JOL | online | Mturk participants | 40 | 40 | RWP | 60 | 12, 48 | 12, 48 | very small, intermediate | small | WS | 8s | immediate | no | free recall | no | no | preprint | unpublished | -0.01081525187 | 0.04316901648 | ||||
66 | Double-2019-2-JOL | JOL | online | Mturk participants | 40 | 40 | UWP | 60 | 12, 48 | 12, 48 | very small, intermediate | small | WS | 8s | immediate | no | free recall | no | no | preprint | unpublished | 0.04316370423 | 0.05687279945 | ||||
67 | Double-2019-3-JOL | JOL | online | Mturk participants | 40 | 40 | RWP | 60 | 12, 48 | 12, 48 | very small, intermediate | small | WS | self-paced | immediate | no | free recall | no | no | preprint | unpublished | 0.1042708731 | 0.04292390768 | ||||
68 | Undorf & Zimdahl-2019-1 | laboratory | undergrad | 62 | 62 | UWL | 52 | 48 different font sizes between 6 point and 500 point | 29, 294 | intermediate, very large | large | WS | 2s | immediate | lexical decision task | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.8847586473 | 0.1795294229 | only data for 29pt and 294pt were included | ||||
69 | Undorf & Zimdahl-2019-2-with chin rest | chin-rest | laboratory | undergrad | 27 | 27 | UWL | 52 | 9, 29, 93, 294 | 29, 294 | intermediate, very large | large | WS | 2s | immediate | lexical decision task | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 1.338263004 | 0.2724417345 | only data for 29pt and 294pt were included; lexical decision task administered after test | |||
70 | Undorf & Zimdahl-2019-2-no chin rest | no chin-rest | laboratory | undergrad | 30 | 30 | UWL | 52 | 9, 29, 93, 294 | 29, 294 | intermediate, very large | large | WS | 2s | immediate | lexical decision task | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.8783157853 | 0.2060523283 | only data for 29pt and 294pt were included; lexical decision task administered after test | |||
71 | Undorf & Zimdahl-2019-3-belief before study | belief-before-study | laboratory | undergrad | 30 | 30 | UWL | 52 | 9, 29, 93, 294 | 29, 294 | intermediate, very large | large | WS | 2s | immediate | lexical decision task | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.8944781168 | 0.1686946251 | only data for 29pt and 294pt were included; lexical decision task administered after test | |||
72 | Undorf & Zimdahl-2019-3-belief after study | belief-after- study | laboratory | undergrad | 31 | 31 | UWL | 52 | 9, 29, 93, 294 | 29, 294 | intermediate, very large | large | WS | 2s | immediate | lexical decision task | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 1.079492943 | 0.2282468217 | only data for 29pt and 294pt were included; lexical decision task administered after test | |||
73 | Undorf & Zimdahl-2019-3-belief after test | belief-after-test | laboratory | undergrad | 29 | 29 | UWL | 52 | 9, 29, 93, 294 | 29, 294 | intermediate, very large | large | WS | 2s | immediate | lexical decision task | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.6985316128 | 0.1650339662 | only data for 29pt and 294pt were included; lexical decision task administered after test | |||
74 | Undorf & Zimdahl-2019-4 | laboratory | undergrad | 30 | 30 | UWL | 104 | 9, 29, 93, 294 | 29, 294 | intermediate, very large | large | WS | 2s | immediate | lexical decision task | word vs. non-word | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.4362766285 | 0.1321634894 | only data for 29pt and 294pt were included; data for non-words are not included; lexical decision task administered during study | |||
75 | Bröder & Undorf-2019-5-dichotomous fonts | dichotomous | laboratory | undergrad | 33 | 33 | UWL | 68 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 3s | immediate | no | concreteness, emotion | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.2367666873 | 0.08612584289 | |||
76 | Bröder & Undorf-2019-5-continuous fonts | continuous | laboratory | undergrad | 34 | 34 | UWL | 68 | 18, 21, 24, 27, 31, 36, 41, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 3s | immediate | no | concreteness, emotion | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.3647018298 | 0.1426089403 | only data for 18pt and 48pt were included | ||
77 | Luna, Albuquerque et al.-2019-1-unrelated | unrelated sentence | laboratory | undergrad | 24 | 24 | unrelated sentence | 44 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 4s | immediate | no | cued recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.4503316098 | 0.2923111669 | restudy choice beneath the JOL; The subject was used as the cue and the rest of the sentence as the target | |||
78 | Luna, Albuquerque et al.-2019-1-related | related sentence | laboratory | undergrad | 26 | 26 | related sentence | 44 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 4s | immediate | no | cued recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.2559074067 | 0.2784829887 | restudy choice beneath the JOL; The subject was used as the cue and the rest of the sentence as the target | |||
79 | Luna, Albuquerque et al.-2019-2-unrelated | unrelated sentences | laboratory | undergrad | 30 | 30 | unrelated sentence | 60 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | other | immediate | no | cued recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.07531361949 | 0.2582904073 | The first sentence acted as the cue and the second as target | |||
80 | Luna, Albuquerque et al.-2019-2-related | related sentences | laboratory | undergrad | 30 | 30 | related sentence | 60 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | other | immediate | no | cued recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.2071928478 | 0.2588907246 | The first sentence acted as the cue and the second as target | |||
81 | Luna, Albuquerque et al.-2019-3-short setence | short setence | laboratory | undergrad | 68 | 68 | unrelated sentence | 40 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | other | immediate | no | short vs. long sentence | cued recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.1661517 | 0.1717942 | Only data for short sentence is included because sentence length was manipulated within subjects and there was a setence length x font size interaction. The subject was used as the cue and the rest of the sentence as the target | ||
82 | Luna, Albuquerque et al.-2019-4-high load | high cognitive load | laboratory | undergrad | 42 | 42 | unrelated sentence | 40 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 5s | immediate | no | cued recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.02439053487 | 0.2182260037 | dot-memory task before study and JOL | |||
83 | Luna, Albuquerque et al.-2019-4-low load | low cognitive load | laboratory | undergrad | 42 | 42 | unrelated sentence | 40 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 5s | immediate | no | cued recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.1723561276 | 0.2186226723 | dot-memory task after study and JOL | |||
84 | Luna,Nogueira et al.-2019-1 | laboratory | undergrad | 42 | 42 | UWL | 68 | 18, 48, 250 | 18, 250 | intermediate, very large | large | WS | 2s | immediate | no | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.4681238973 | 0.221186465 | only data for 18-pt and 250-pt words were included | ||||
85 | Luna,Nogueira et al.-2019-2 | laboratory | undergrad | 40 | 40 | UWL | 48 | 18, 250 | 18, 250 | intermediate, very large | large | WS | 2s | immediate | lexical decision task | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.4317266361 | 0.2261966496 | lexical decision task was administerred in experiment 3 | ||||
86 | Kelly-2019-1 | laboratory | undergrad | 30 | 30 | UWL | 69 | 18, 48, 140 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 5s | immediate | response time | free recall | no | no | thesis | unpublished | 0.2329062635 | 0.2590727911 | participants were required to read each word aloud; only data for 18pt and 48pt were included | ||||
87 | Kelly-2019-2 | laboratory | undergrad | 28 | 28 | UWL | 68 | 48, 160 | 48, 160 | intermediate, very large | large | WS | 5s | immediate | response time | free recall | no | no | thesis | unpublished | 0.2081558924 | 0.2679840226 | participants were required to read each word aloud | ||||
88 | Chen et al.-2019-1-incongruent framing | small-more-fluent-instruction | laboratory | undergrad | 22 | 22 | UWP | 120 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 5s | immediate | no | cued recall | no | counterintuitive | journal article | published | -0.01236386781 | 0.3015142252 | ||||
89 | Chen et al.-2019-1-congruent framing | large-more-fluent-instruction | laboratory | undergrad | 22 | 22 | UWP | 120 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 5s | immediate | no | cued recall | no | intuitive | journal article | published | 0.2919298416 | 0.3031130721 | ||||
90 | Chen et al.-2019-1-control | control | laboratory | undergrad | 25 | 25 | UWP | 120 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 5s | immediate | no | cued recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.1345626073 | 0.2831626228 | ||||
91 | Chen et al.-2019-2-congruent framing | large-more-fluent-better-memory-instruction | laboratory | undergrad | 27 | 27 | UWP | 120 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 5s | immediate | no | cued recall | no | intuitive | journal article | published | 0.5767836884 | 0.2777668791 | ||||
92 | Chen et al.-2019-2-incongruent framing | large-more-fluent-irrelevant-instruction | laboratory | undergrad | 27 | 27 | UWP | 120 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 5s | immediate | no | cued recall | no | counterintuitive | journal article | published | 0.01364636548 | 0.2721686947 | ||||
93 | Chen et al.-2019-2-control | control | laboratory | undergrad | 23 | 23 | UWP | 120 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 5s | immediate | no | cued recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.2157206563 | 0.2957403275 | ||||
94 | Smith-2019-2 | laboratory | undergrad | 104 | 104 | UWP | 60 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 5s | immediate | no | cued recall | no | no | thesis | unpublished | 0.0780763534 | 0.1387278735 | Participants studied word pairs in the first study cycle and a third word was added to each word pair in the second study cycle; participants were to recall both targets; JOLs were made on a 7-pt scale | ||||
95 | Peynircioglu &Tatz-2019-1-visual | laboratory | undergrad | 20 | 20 | UWL | 40 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 5s | immediate | no | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.6843363104 | 0.2862161113 | |||||
96 | Peynircioglu &Tatz-2019-2-visual | laboratory | undergrad | 20 | 20 | UWL | 40 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | BS | 5s | immediate | no | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.4472730412 | 0.3201572499 | |||||
97 | Peynircioglu &Tatz-2019-4 | laboratory | undergrad | 20 | 20 | UWL | 40 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | WS | 5s | immediate | no | loud vs. quiet | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 1.056740395 | 0.2142295125 | data were collapsed across the conditions of the other variable because there was no interaction reported. | |||
98 | Peynircioglu &Tatz-2019-5-loud | loud | laboratory | undergrad | 20 | 20 | UWL | 40 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | BS | 5s | immediate | no | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.09615770512 | 0.3164104594 | ||||
99 | Peynircioglu &Tatz-2019-5-quiet | quiet | laboratory | undergrad | 20 | 20 | UWL | 40 | 18, 48 | 18, 48 | intermediate | small | BS | 5s | immediate | no | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | -0.3193469409 | 0.3182369885 | ||||
100 | Zhao et al.-2020-1 | laboratory | undergrad | 26 | 26 | UWL | 56 | 9, 70 | 9, 70 | very small, intermediate | medium | WS | self-paced | immediate | continuous identification task | free recall | no | no | journal article | published | 0.9847131993 | 0.2936779385 | continuous identification task administered before JOL |