A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | AA | AB | AC | AD | AE | AF | AG | AH | AI | AJ | AK | AL | AM | AN | AO | AP | AQ | AR | AS | AT | AU | AV | AW | AX | AY | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | New Incentives – current states of operation | New Incentives – prospective states | New Incentives – prospective states | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | Nigeria | ||||||||||||
3 | Inputs | unit | type | Overall | Bauchi | Gombe | Jigawa | Kaduna - cohort 17 | Kano | Katsina | Kebbi | Sokoto | Zamfara | Abia | Adamawa | Akwa Ibom | Anambra | Bayelsa | Benue | Borno | Cross River | Delta | Ebonyi | Edo | Ekiti | Enugu | FCT | Imo | Kaduna | Kogi | Kwara | Lagos | Nasarawa | Niger | Niger - cohorts 32 & 36 | Niger - cohort 34 | Ogun | Ondo | Osun | Oyo | Plateau | Rivers | Taraba | Yobe | Source | GW analysis and discussion | ||||||
4 | Final cost-effectiveness estimate (pulled from "Main calcs" sheet for visibility) | xcash | calc | - | 19.9 | 9.9 | 18.0 | 8.9 | 12.5 | 16.7 | 28.8 | 38.3 | 31.1 | 1.7 | 3.9 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 2.6 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 5.2 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 3.2 | 7.3 | 8.7 | 5.3 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 6.3 | 11.4 | ||||||||
5 | Costs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | GiveWell costs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | Grant size | $ | input | $1,000,000 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Arbitrary value | |||||||
9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | Cost per child covered | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11 | Cost per infant enrolled in the program | $ | input | $16.26 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | New Incentives, Summary of Funding Gap Estimates (unpublished) | |||||||
12 | Adjustment for repeat enrollments | % | input | 10.72% | GW analysis | GW's analysis of New Incentives cost per infant immunized | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | Vaccine efficacy | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | Vaccine efficacy rates from meta-analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | BCG vaccine efficacy rate from Abubakar et al. 2013 | % | input | 66% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Abubakar et al. 2013 | |||||||
18 | DTP vaccine efficacy rate from the LiST meta-analysis (part of the Penta vaccine) | % | input | 94% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Lives Saved Tool (LiST) | |||||||
19 | Hib vaccine efficacy rate from Thumburu et al. 2015 (part of the Penta vaccine) | % | input | 82% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Thumburu et al. 2015 | |||||||
20 | PCV vaccine efficacy rate from the LiST meta-analysis | % | input | 48% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Cutts et al. 2005 and Klugman et al. 2003 | |||||||
21 | Rotavirus vaccine efficacy rate from the LiST meta-analysis | % | input | 46% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Lives Saved Tool (LiST) | |||||||
22 | Measles single dose vaccine efficacy rate from the LiST meta-analysis | % | input | 85% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Lives Saved Tool (LiST) | |||||||
23 | Measles two-dose vaccine efficacy rate, adjusted from the LiST meta-analysis | % | input | 90% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Lives Saved Tool (LiST) | |||||||
24 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
25 | Adjustment for geography-specific vaccine efficacy | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26 | Measles vaccine efficacy rate GiveWell infers from the results of IDinsight's biomarkers pilot, assuming the results are entirely explained by vaccine efficacy | % | input | 26% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | GW analysis | GW's analysis of the biomarkers pilot results for Nigeria | ||||||
27 | Measles vaccine efficacy rate implied by the results of Fowotade et al. 2015 | % | input | 69% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Fowotade et al. 2015 | |||||||
28 | Measles vaccine efficacy rate from Uzicanin and Zimmerman 2011 | % | input | 73% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Uzicanin and Zimmerman 2011 | |||||||
29 | Weight assigned to the vaccine efficacy rate from the LiST meta-analysis | % | input | 20% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | GW guesstimate | |||||||
30 | Weight assigned to the vaccine efficacy rate GiveWell infers from the results of IDinsight's biomarkers pilot | % | input | 10% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | GW guesstimate | |||||||
31 | Weight assigned to the vaccine efficacy rate implied by the results of Fowotade et al. 2015 | % | input | 35% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | GW guesstimate | |||||||
32 | Weight assigned to the vaccine efficacy rate from Uzicanin and Zimmerman 2011 | % | input | 35% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | GW guesstimate | |||||||
33 | Proportion of the adjustment for geography-specific measles vaccine efficacy that applies to other vaccines | % | input | 75% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | GW guesstimate | |||||||
34 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
35 | Vaccine coverage in trials | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
36 | Vaccination coverage rate in the trials informing our vaccine efficacy estimates | % | input | 95% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | GW guesstimate | |||||||
37 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
38 | Baseline vaccination coverage | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
39 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
40 | Populations targeted by New Incentives' coverage surveys | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
41 | Number of local government areas (LGAs) within the state | # | input | - | 20 | 11 | 27 | 6 | 44 | 34 | 21 | 23 | 14 | 17 | 21 | 31 | 21 | 8 | 23 | 27 | 18 | 25 | 12 | 18 | 16 | 17 | 6 | 27 | 23 | 21 | 16 | 20 | 13 | 25 | 12 | 6 | 20 | 18 | 30 | 33 | 17 | 23 | 16 | 17 | Local government areas of Nigeria | |||||||
42 | Number of LGAs surveyed by New Incentives' coverage surveys | # | input | - | 20 | 11 | 23 | 6 | 44 | 12 | 16 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 | GW analysis | GW's analysis of vaccination coverage found in New Incentives' rapid assessments | ||||||
43 | Starting year of New Incentives' coverage surveys | # | input | - | 2022 | 2022 | 2021 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2023 | 2022 | 2022 | 0 | 2023 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 2024 | New Incentives, data from coverage surveys | |||||||
44 | Ending year of New Incentives' coverage surveys | # | input | - | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | 2022 | 0 | 2023 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 2024 | New Incentives, data from coverage surveys | |||||||
45 | Adjustment for higher confidence in coverage survey results | % | input | 50% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | GW guesstimate | |||||||
46 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
47 | Baseline vaccination coverage found in New Incentives' coverage surveys | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
48 | Proportion of children reported to have received the BCG vaccine in New Incentives' coverage surveys | % | input | - | 55% | 73% | 61% | 64% | 61% | 42% | 40% | 35% | 21% | - | 89% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 77% | - | - | - | - | 66% | 62% | 76% | - | - | - | - | - | - | 76% | 63% | GW analysis | GW's analysis of vaccination coverage found in New Incentives' rapid assessments | ||||||
49 | Proportion of children reported to have received the 1st dose of the Penta vaccine in New Incentives' coverage surveys | % | input | - | 49% | 68% | 57% | 60% | 56% | 39% | 34% | 27% | 14% | - | 86% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 74% | - | - | - | - | 63% | 57% | 75% | - | - | - | - | - | - | 73% | 59% | GW analysis | GW's analysis of vaccination coverage found in New Incentives' rapid assessments | ||||||
50 | Proportion of children reported to have received the 2nd dose of the Penta vaccine in New Incentives' coverage surveys | % | input | - | 45% | 63% | 52% | 51% | 48% | 37% | 24% | 26% | 13% | - | 79% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 67% | - | - | - | - | 53% | 46% | 65% | - | - | - | - | - | - | 66% | 48% | GW analysis | GW's analysis of vaccination coverage found in New Incentives' rapid assessments | ||||||
51 | Proportion of children reported to have received the 3rd dose of the Penta vaccine in New Incentives' coverage surveys | % | input | - | 35% | 50% | 40% | 41% | 37% | 30% | 15% | 19% | 9% | - | 70% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 58% | - | - | - | - | 39% | 34% | 50% | - | - | - | - | - | - | 56% | 38% | GW analysis | GW's analysis of vaccination coverage found in New Incentives' rapid assessments | ||||||
52 | Proportion of children reported to have received the 1st dose of the measles vaccine in New Incentives' coverage surveys | % | input | - | 35% | 49% | 37% | 32% | 32% | 26% | 23% | 21% | 14% | - | 59% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 54% | - | - | - | - | 36% | 31% | 45% | - | - | - | - | - | - | 51% | 35% | GW analysis | GW's analysis of vaccination coverage found in New Incentives' rapid assessments | ||||||
53 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
54 | Baseline vaccination coverage found in coverage surveys, adjusted for self-report bias | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
55 | Adjustment for self-report bias in New Incentives' coverage surveys | % | input | 0.06% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | GW analysis | GW's analysis of vaccination coverage found in New Incentives' rapid assessments | ||||||
56 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57 | Baseline vaccination coverage found in 2021 MICS coverage surveys | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
58 | Proportion of children reported to have received the BCG vaccine in the 2021 MICS survey | % | input | - | 49% | 59% | 64% | 78% | 60% | 57% | 64% | 34% | 51% | 91% | 84% | 86% | 84% | 79% | 82% | 65% | 93% | 84% | 99% | 92% | 99% | 99% | 95% | 95% | 78% | 92% | 72% | 94% | 79% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 72% | 75% | 93% | 83% | 88% | 90% | 71% | 75% | Nigeria MICS report, 2021 | |||||||
59 | Proportion of children reported to have received the 1st dose of the Penta vaccine in the 2021 MICS survey | % | input | - | 42% | 54% | 61% | 73% | 55% | 53% | 60% | 29% | 45% | 88% | 75% | 86% | 83% | 78% | 81% | 58% | 93% | 81% | 99% | 92% | 95% | 99% | 91% | 94% | 73% | 86% | 66% | 92% | 72% | 62% | 62% | 62% | 67% | 73% | 91% | 76% | 80% | 90% | 72% | 74% | Nigeria MICS report, 2021 | |||||||
60 | Proportion of children reported to have received the 2nd dose of the Penta vaccine in the 2021 MICS survey | % | input | - | 38% | 51% | 56% | 67% | 47% | 47% | 58% | 18% | 35% | 86% | 67% | 82% | 75% | 76% | 75% | 45% | 92% | 76% | 99% | 91% | 94% | 97% | 87% | 93% | 67% | 74% | 64% | 90% | 65% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 58% | 68% | 88% | 64% | 78% | 87% | 65% | 71% | Nigeria MICS report, 2021 | |||||||
61 | Proportion of children reported to have received the 3rd dose of the Penta vaccine in the 2021 MICS survey | % | input | - | 31% | 38% | 49% | 60% | 42% | 41% | 55% | 12% | 25% | 75% | 54% | 73% | 74% | 70% | 63% | 30% | 75% | 70% | 99% | 83% | 85% | 91% | 80% | 89% | 60% | 63% | 55% | 85% | 54% | 39% | 39% | 39% | 41% | 63% | 82% | 57% | 65% | 78% | 52% | 64% | Nigeria MICS report, 2021 | |||||||
62 | Proportion of children reported to have received the 1st dose of the PCV vaccine in the 2021 MICS survey | % | input | - | 42% | 52% | 61% | 72% | 54% | 52% | 60% | 22% | 46% | 89% | 75% | 84% | 83% | 77% | 79% | 54% | 93% | 79% | 99% | 90% | 96% | 99% | 91% | 94% | 72% | 85% | 64% | 92% | 71% | 58% | 58% | 58% | 65% | 72% | 91% | 75% | 79% | 90% | 71% | 72% | Nigeria MICS report, 2021 | |||||||
63 | Proportion of children reported to have received the 2nd dose of the PCV vaccine in the 2021 MICS survey | % | input | - | 38% | 47% | 56% | 65% | 47% | 44% | 57% | 14% | 36% | 85% | 67% | 82% | 75% | 75% | 71% | 38% | 92% | 73% | 99% | 86% | 90% | 96% | 87% | 91% | 65% | 72% | 61% | 89% | 63% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 57% | 66% | 83% | 63% | 69% | 85% | 62% | 68% | Nigeria MICS report, 2021 | |||||||
64 | Proportion of children reported to have received the 3rd dose of the PCV vaccine in the 2021 MICS survey | % | input | - | 31% | 37% | 48% | 59% | 40% | 39% | 54% | 10% | 27% | 67% | 54% | 71% | 74% | 67% | 56% | 31% | 73% | 69% | 99% | 77% | 83% | 91% | 80% | 86% | 59% | 62% | 53% | 80% | 51% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 61% | 69% | 57% | 61% | 79% | 50% | 63% | Nigeria MICS report, 2021 | |||||||
65 | Proportion of children reported to have received the 1st dose of the measles vaccine in the 2021 MICS survey | % | input | - | 31% | 37% | 56% | 57% | 41% | 44% | 63% | 19% | 46% | 75% | 61% | 72% | 67% | 66% | 68% | 39% | 80% | 73% | 92% | 80% | 95% | 80% | 90% | 75% | 57% | 72% | 64% | 86% | 57% | 55% | 55% | 55% | 56% | 66% | 80% | 61% | 70% | 85% | 65% | 71% | Nigeria MICS report, 2021 | |||||||
66 | Proportion of children reported to have received the 2nd dose of the measles vaccine in the 2021 MICS survey | % | input | - | 11% | 18% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 25% | 55% | 19% | 33% | 61% | 31% | 45% | 65% | 57% | 32% | 18% | 53% | 51% | 66% | 49% | 66% | 66% | 46% | 41% | 31% | 57% | 34% | 68% | 27% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 42% | 50% | 54% | 44% | 26% | 54% | 39% | 48% | Nigeria MICS report, 2021 | |||||||
67 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
68 | Baseline vaccination coverage found in 2017 MICS coverage surveys | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
69 | Proportion of children reported to have received the 1st dose of the Penta vaccine in the 2017 MICS survey | % | input | - | 35% | 45% | 20% | 44% | 28% | 28% | 20% | 9% | 15% | 82% | 57% | 80% | 90% | 61% | 68% | 73% | 84% | 76% | 80% | 89% | 87% | 85% | 88% | 88% | 44% | 64% | 71% | 94% | 56% | 36% | 36% | 36% | 71% | 76% | 83% | 69% | 70% | 82% | 36% | 18% | Nigeria MICS report, 2017 | |||||||
70 | Proportion of children reported to have received the 2nd dose of the Penta vaccine in the 2017 MICS survey | % | input | - | 25% | 29% | 9% | 33% | 21% | 18% | 17% | 5% | 10% | 69% | 50% | 73% | 82% | 50% | 60% | 64% | 77% | 64% | 66% | 86% | 80% | 79% | 72% | 72% | 33% | 48% | 61% | 86% | 45% | 31% | 31% | 31% | 59% | 71% | 66% | 65% | 57% | 73% | 20% | 11% | Nigeria MICS report, 2017 | |||||||
71 | Proportion of children reported to have received the 3rd dose of the Penta vaccine in the 2017 MICS survey | % | input | - | 19% | 25% | 7% | 30% | 16% | 12% | 11% | 3% | 9% | 55% | 38% | 68% | 76% | 43% | 57% | 48% | 70% | 57% | 54% | 75% | 72% | 74% | 66% | 66% | 30% | 38% | 49% | 80% | 35% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 52% | 66% | 60% | 54% | 45% | 66% | 16% | 9% | Nigeria MICS report, 2017 | |||||||
72 | Proportion of children reported to have received the BCG vaccine in the 2017 MICS survey | % | input | - | 41% | 54% | 26% | 51% | 34% | 29% | 23% | 16% | 19% | 87% | 67% | 82% | 89% | 66% | 66% | 81% | 88% | 81% | 83% | 97% | 87% | 93% | 88% | 96% | 51% | 73% | 72% | 93% | 64% | 38% | 38% | 38% | 80% | 83% | 88% | 77% | 80% | 82% | 40% | 16% | Nigeria MICS report, 2017 | |||||||
73 | Proportion of children reported to have received the 1st dose of the measles vaccine in the 2017 MICS survey | % | input | - | 22% | 32% | 10% | 43% | 24% | 21% | 26% | 10% | 16% | 70% | 49% | 64% | 75% | 52% | 54% | 58% | 74% | 64% | 58% | 86% | 80% | 81% | 76% | 75% | 43% | 65% | 67% | 88% | 50% | 31% | 31% | 31% | 59% | 72% | 67% | 53% | 65% | 71% | 29% | 15% | Nigeria MICS report, 2017 | |||||||
74 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
75 | Self-report adjustments for MICS surveys | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
76 | Proportion of positive responses that came from self-report in the 2021 MICS survey | % | input | 22% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | GW analysis | GW's analysis of self-report bias in vaccine coverage sources for New Incentives | ||||||
77 | Proportion of positive responses that came from self-report in the 2017 MICS survey | % | input | 44% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | GW analysis | GW's analysis of self-report bias in vaccine coverage sources for New Incentives | ||||||
78 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
79 | Estimated change in counterfactual vaccination coverage over time | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
80 | Estimated change per year in the proportion of children that are unvaccinated, in the absence of New Incentives | % | input | -5% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | GW guesstimate | |||||||
81 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
82 | Weighting of coverage estimates from different sources for the rotavirus vaccine | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
83 | Weight placed on estimated coverage for the Penta vaccine for estimating rotavirus vaccine coverage | % | input | 50% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | GW guesstimate | |||||||
84 | Weight placed on estimated coverage for the PCV vaccine for estimating rotavirus vaccine coverage | % | input | 50% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | GW guesstimate | |||||||
85 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
86 | Baseline coverage for the rotavirus vaccine | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
87 | Proportion of people under age 5 represented in GBD 2021 disease burden estimates who received the 1st dose of the rotavirus vaccine | % | input | 0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | GW guesstimate | |||||||
88 | Proportion of people under age 5 represented in GBD 2021 disease burden estimates who received the 2nd dose of the rotavirus vaccine | % | input | 0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | GW guesstimate | |||||||
89 | Proportion of people under age 5 represented in GBD 2021 disease burden estimates who received the 3rd dose of the rotavirus vaccine | % | input | 0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | GW guesstimate | |||||||
90 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
91 | Weighting of vaccination coverage estimates from different sources for the measles vaccine | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
92 | Weight placed on the results of New Incentives' coverage surveys for estimating measles vaccine coverage | % | input | 0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | GW guesstimate | |||||||
93 | Weight placed on the results of the 2021 MICS survey for estimating measles vaccine coverage | % | input | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | GW guesstimate | |||||||
94 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
95 | Proportion of vaccine efficacy provided by individual doses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
96 | Proportion of total Penta vaccine efficacy provided by the 1st dose | % | input | 35% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | GW guesstimate | |||||||
97 | Proportion of total Penta vaccine efficacy provided by the 2nd dose | % | input | 55% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | GW guesstimate | |||||||
98 | Proportion of total Penta vaccine efficacy provided by the 3rd dose | % | input | 10% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | GW guesstimate | |||||||
99 | Proportion of total PCV vaccine efficacy provided by the 1st dose | % | input | 35% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | GW guesstimate | |||||||
100 | Proportion of total PCV vaccine efficacy provided by the 2nd dose | % | input | 55% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | GW guesstimate |