ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAAABACADAEAFAGAHAIAJAKALAMANAOAPAQARASATAU
1
1st DISECAttendanceTotal ScoreRankSpeech TotalSub(10) SpeechesComment TotalComments (5)Mod Caucus TotalModerated Caucus (5)Informal Caucus TotalInformal Caucus (5)Question TotalQuestions (3)DiplomacyCommentsTotal Rankings
2
10/3
3
CountryPts.RankNumber of Comments/Mods
4
Algeria10.230000010.10.04IraqPV72.51AZERBAIJAN0
5
United StatesPV69.2
6
Bangladesh10.230000010.10.06PakistanPV64.53AFGHANISTAN0
7
PanamaP64.4
8
BrazilP48.518776.53.53.521.53.543.5010.brings up paper, slight stuttering, stands firm on ban of LAWS, believes in strict regulations and mandatory oversight of LAWS, seems stiff hands at side, solution: wants mandatory human checks on LAWS, international 24/7 software, no implementation comment: maintains good tone and addresses solution in comment: wants stricter punishments on LAWS, wants punishments for violations 48.58MexicoPV63.55AUSTRALIA3
9
33.533.54CambodiaPV62.56
10
CambodiaPV62.5616810.53.53.53.53.522.5444010.Brings paper up, good tone used during speech however doesnt maintain good eye contact, supports clear international rules for the control of LAWS, wants standards for international security, wants more human responsibility, tries to include others, solution: 2 tier international framework wants global ban on LAWS, needs more implementation on how this would work, Sub Speech: humans need to control LAWS, comment: wants governmental logic and lethal oversight over military tech, Republic of KoreaP62.7BANGLADESH4
11
83.53.543Russian FederationPV61.8
12
Canada10.230000010.10.12ChinaPV60.9BRAZIL0
13
UkrainePV58.510
14
ChadPV54.51414.576.533.53.5203.53.53010.brought paper up, looks at paper during duration of speech, shows country envolvement of country in relation to UN resolutions, addresses concerns over laws, good emphasis on country policy, comment: wants protections on lethal autonomous weaponry, cuts speech short, focuses on accountability comment: wants humans always in charge of weapons, cuts speech short, wants regulations towards AI usage and training mod, wants semi-autonomous weapons to be used to JordanPV57.511BOLIVIA3
15
7.53.53.533.5FinlandPV56.512
16
Chile10.230000010.GuyanaPV56.13CZECH REPUBLIC0
17
ChadPV54.514
18
ChinaPV60.9157.5447.5423.54.543.5010.Brought paper up, hook: who is responsible for LAWS, addresses country policy wanting LAWS frameworks, strict regulating systems under human supervision, international cooperation for global security, frequently looks at paper but maintains good tone, wants more human regulation, wants peaceful ai usage, mod: wants to develop understanding over AI, speech: good tone maintained, good hand movement, needs more eye contact, wants clear accountability 60.18PeruP53.515COLOMBIA3
19
7.53.543.54United KingdomPV50.516
20
Czech RepublicP37.21603.53.517.5332010.no paper brought up, proposition to limit all laws, stop production of LAWS, until UN gives consensus on limtations of LAWS, how would you do this?implementation?, further safeguards need to be put into place to all semi-LAWS to be used and created so humnans have control of LAWS systems mod: wants humans to take control over LAWS37.2NigeriaP49.517CHINA1
21
633.53BrazilP48.518
22
Ecuador10.2300000010.10.22Israel48.518CANADA0
23
FranceP42.520
24
FinlandPV56.512178.573.54418.5333010.Good tone maintained, no paper brought up, addresses whole room, wants LAWS only to be used for navigation, wants LAWS in human hands, wants complying to humanitarian rules, wants people to come together to address this issue, slight time leftover, HRR solution: overseeing of LAWS, trained courses for operators to keep people safe, how would this be implemented HOP: trained operator to overlook autonomous weapons, clear international rules, speech: strong tone and hook, HOP human oversight protical to test all laws making sure they comply with humanitarian rights 56.74Czech RepublicP37.21CHAD4
25
8.53.503.533VietnamP32.22
26
FranceP42.520773.53.533193.53.53010.Brought paper up, lacks good eye contact, slight stuttering through speech, acknowledges country policy supports the utilization of LAWS however affirms the banning of LAWS needing to set a clear regulation in place. wants to use strategic use of AI, comment: thinks humans should take responsibility over LAWS comment: raises questions over Nigeria's solutions and the time frame given to implement the solution 42.76Algeria10.23CUBA2
27
333Bangladesh10.23
28
Germany10.230000010.10.28Canada10.23DENMARK0
29
Chile10.23
30
Greece10.230000010.10.3Ecuador10.23DJIBOUTI0
31
Germany10.23
32
GuyanaPV56.1314.57447.53.520443010.Brings paper up, decent eye contact used, addresses problems of LAWS such as armed drone strikes, wants to ensure ethicality for LAWS framework, left 15 seconds on speech time, solution: monthly examinations for LAWS, needs more implmentation, Speech: wants to ban ai, trace supply chains, place penalties, wants ai engineers to have monthly inspections, central public data base, needs implementation on how ai would be banned as the majoirity of the world uses it, cuts speech short, 56.32Greece10.23EHTIOPIA3
33
7.54333Hungary10.23
34
Hungary10.230000010.10.34India10.23EGYPT0
35
Indonesia10.23
36
India10.230000010.10.36Japan10.23FRANCE0
37
Kenya10.23
38
Indonesia10.230000010.Libya10.23GERMANY0
39
New Zealand10.23
40
IraqPV72.5118914543.53.52754.54.5010.Good pace maintained through speech, slight stuttering through speech, good use of stats, Comment: wants production safeguards mandate, videos and data logged by stats, stopped right on time, comment: good tone, authorized attack zone plan, gives operator full control over LAWS to minimize LAWS systems, speech: good hook used, pushed for ban of LAWS solution: delegate life and death decisions to humans, whenever AI launched an attack, control will be given to the operator, operators must take a test to validate that they are able to address LAWS, must get approval by senior operators mod: teaches dangers of LAWS through board games leading to eventual and future bans spreading awareness72.9South Africa10.23GHANA4
41
95454Sudan10.23
42
Israel48.5187446.53213.53.53010.raises question over accountability of LAWS, mod: doesn't want to ban LAWS, wants LAWS to be legal, wants a neutral committee48.92Turkey10.23INDIA3
43
73.5344Uganda10.23
44
Japan10.230000010.10.44Venezuela10.23INDONESIA0
45
46
JordanPV57.51114.57.510.53.53.53.53.519243010.brings post it note up, addresses the need to not trust AI to make decisions on LAWS, slight stuttering and frequent look at post it, urges UN to make strict guidelines for concrete system of accountability on war systems, raises questions on viability of solution (Iraq), comment: supports US solution, speech: wants stronger training ans safety standards, strong human control over LAWS and someone to hold accountable, mod: wants testing to differentiate humans vs targets, mod: funny hook, doesn't want an outright ban, wants strict oversight to be able to trust Ai57.96IRAN4
47
73.5343
48
Kenya10.230000010.10.48IRELAND0
49
50
Libya10.230000010.10.5JAPAN0
51
52
MexicoPV63.5515.57.5956.5322.53.544010.brings paper up, brings up resolution signed to support its stance on country policy, wants to address the use of lethal force through laws, wants human accountability to address humanitarian principles, left 10 seconds left on speech time, Solution: wants an international committee to over look LAWS, needs more implementation leaves more then half the time to the chair speech: international committee to stop escalation at the source and limit use of AI that helps international support of military comment: 64.02KENYA4
53
843.543.53.5
54
New Zealand10.230000010.10.54LIBYA0
55
56
NigeriaP49.5171376.53.53.53.516.53.533010.Brings computer up, good tone maintained, calls for strict regulation of LAWS, calls for resources to be used to address laws, wants international safety usage of LAWS, wants strict regulations, solution: strict regulations, comment: violators given 3 months to discontiue any out of line laws to ensure global safety50.06LEBANON3
57
63223
58
PakistanPV64.5316.58.514.543.5023.5443.5010.brings paper up, but maintains good use of tone and good hand motions to not appear stiff, wants humans to decide use of LAWS, calls for countries to follow international humanitarian law, leaves time to chair, believes AI should only assist humans, comment: wants strict training and legal reviews before deployment along with a self destruct option should ai make attempts to make decisions without human interaction speech: clear international rules to give humans all power to decide how LAWS systems works to be able to stop systems at any time, brought paper up, lacking eye contact, urges all delegates to act on LAWS addressal comment:legal reviews of weaponry, 65.08MEXICO4
59
843444
60
PanamaP64.4188953324434.5010.Maintains good tone and speaking voice doesnt bring paper up, slight stutter addresses the whole room bringing an emphasis on the topic, adopted 11 guiding principles to support its country policy, addresses the need to regulate the use of LAWS, cuts del off, comment: strong voice used, wants to properly test LAWS, wants standards for reliability before putting LAWS into use, good use of tone for speech, proposes: central american autonomous weapons registry, (1995) treaty for global transparency, report basic info on AWS, reports human oversight required for its use, mod: funny hook, wants high risk laws prohibitation, not a lot of content detailed needs more implementation 64.6NIGERIA3
61
104444.5
62
PeruP53.5156.56.56.53103.53.520.53.533010.Lacks projection, brought paper & read, good info. 2-tier approach and oversight, solution: wants restrictions and accountability, doesnt believe ai should be in control, comment: brings up loopholes of US solution to truly limit potential bigger issues. mod: educate civilians on technology to make them aware of the situation and test the AI and show different ways of combat, teaching AI and humans, mod: NEW ZEALAND5
63
3.533.54.53
64
Republic of KoreaP62.7157.584842144.53.5010.Funny hook, frequently looking at paper, good tone maintained, good use of stats $2 trillion used on AI tech between US and China, solution: wants records on actions and deployments, can't give weapons power to make decisions, how would this be enforced? comment: wants records of basic information of drones in combat to make states accountable for their actions, speech: AI use in military requires afeguards (BTS) boundaries transpareny safety, taking accountability for weapons and be able to deactivate LAWS should the software malfunction,(SoftKillerRobots NGO), records of what LAWS have done, enforce regulation of LAWS, comment: make sure LAWS are able to comply to international laws, 62.64NORWAY4
65
7.544333
66
Russian FederationPV61.81687.547.54203.53.53.5010.No paper brought up, hands at side during speech, uses good tone , cites CtVT, addresses how countries failed to sign resolutions, wants states to come together and make a framework, toime left over, calls for strict regulations of weaponry, comment: wants a fine on LAWS, doesn't include implementation on how this would happen, comment: brings up question on how to enforce it doesn't bring up a solution to address it, mod: believes LAWS should have operators to control LAWS, mod: doesnt want to ban LAWS, wants severe regulations 61.66PAKISTAN4
67
83.53.5333.5
68
South Africa10.230000010.10.68PHILIPPINES0
69
70
Sudan10.230000010.10.7PORTUGAL0
71
72
Turkey10.230000010.10.72REPUBLIC OF CONGO0
73
74
Uganda10.230000010.10.74RUSSIA0
75
76
UkrainePV58.510157.573.54422.5444010.brings paper up, good use of background to show impact of LAWS without human interaction, believes humans should decide use of LAWS, calls for strict regulations, believes country's have the right to defend themselves, calls upon all member states to hold humans acountable over states speech: does not maintain eye contact during committee, wants human responsibility, prohibiting systems that don't comply with humanitarian law, wants regulations on exports, cuts speech short comment: wants to temporarily restrict development of LAWS till total control is gained mod: wants to suspend development of AI bots to identify LAWS vs humanRWANDA3
77
7.53.543.53
78
United KingdomPV50.516157.544021.5443.5010.Brings paper up, good tone through the speech, needing to adhere to humanitarian law, calls upon human interaction of LAWS, wants to combat the use of LAWS without human interaction, calls for non fully LAWS mod: wants regulation, shows country policy on topic pushing for stronger regulations, speech: mentions UN resolution to build upon international humanitarian law, algorithmic biases to target those in charge of LAWS, mandatory legal inspection system, REPUBLIC OF KOREA1
79
7.5433
80
United StatesPV69.2168.5441244274.554.5010.Post it note brought up, good tone to address the room, addresses the Kargu-2 drone strikes used in topic synopsis, encourages development of defensive autonomous system, addresses previous US program as country, wants accountability of LAWS to keep the people safe, immediateky takeds control of unmod, solution: maintains good tone, no solution proposed other then UN actions previously done comment: good tone, doesn't call for a total ban rather proposes and agency to regulate LAWS but still be able to be used for country security speech: agency to investigate how training procedures are done for laws and accuracy of weapons, to protect as many civilian lives as possible, still be under regulations, mod: educating operators on conditions and LAWS of war to train themSUDAN4
81
7.5444.54.5
82
Venezuela10.230000010.SOUTH SUDAN0
83
84
VietnamP32.227.57.53.53.501143.53.5010.brings paper up, pacing, could use a higher speaking voice but addresses need to have humans look over LAWS, no previous actions mentioned comment: cuts speech short, wants ai to be bannedSPAIN1
85
86
SOUTH AFRICA0
87
88
DIRECTOR DIRECTOR THAILAND0
89
MODERATOR MODERATOR
90
ASST MODERATOR ASST MODERATOR UNITED STATES0
91
92
UNITED KINGDOM0
93
94
UAE0
95
96
UGANDA0
97
98
VIETNAM0
99
100
1.VENEZUELA0