| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW | @ | ||||||||||||||||||||
2 | I, ELLEN JAY P. LLENADO-BRIGOLE, commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the following targets in accordance with the indicated measures for the period JANUARY to JUNE 2023. | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | ELLEN JAY P. LLENADO-BRIGOLE | |||||||||||||||||||||
6 | Secretary to the Sanggunian | |||||||||||||||||||||
7 | Name & Signature of Department Head | |||||||||||||||||||||
8 | Date: ______________________________ | |||||||||||||||||||||
9 | Approved by: | |||||||||||||||||||||
10 | Date | |||||||||||||||||||||
11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | MARIANO S. ESCALADA, JR. | |||||||||||||||||||||
13 | Municipal Vice-Mayor | |||||||||||||||||||||
14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | 5 - Outstanding 4 - Very Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory 1 - Poor | |||||||||||||||||||||
16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
21 | MFO/PAP | Success Idicators (Targets + Measures) | Alloted Budget | Division/ Individuals Accountable | Targets & Accomplishments | Rating | Remarks | |||||||||||||||
22 | E | E | T | E1 | E2 | T3 | A4 | |||||||||||||||
23 | Target | Accomp | Target | Accomp | Target | Accomp | ||||||||||||||||
24 | CORE FUNCTIONS | |||||||||||||||||||||
25 | Legislative Services | 3.91 | ||||||||||||||||||||
26 | POLICY FORMULATION SYSTEM | 3.10 | ||||||||||||||||||||
27 | 1. Formulation of Ordinances | 3.60 | ||||||||||||||||||||
28 | 1.a. Referral of Proposed Policy/ Draft Ordinance | 100% of proposals under the Legislative Agenda were referred to the appropriate committee for policy research, study, and review. | Presiding Officer | 16 | 4 | 100% of the Proposed Policy under the LA were referred to the appropriate committee for research, study and review. | 90% of the Proposed Policy under the LA were referred to the appropriate committee for research, study and review. | 100% of the Proposed Policy under the LA were referred to the appropriate committee within a month upon receipt | 25% of the Proposed Policy under the LA were referred to the appropriate committee within a week | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.00 | reminder: ang counting diri na activity is tong sa LA lang; target is 16 as to LA | ||||||||
29 | Urgent or necessary Proposals were referred to the appropriate committee for policy research, study, and review. | - | 6 | Proposals for Policy support were referred to the appropriate committee for research, study and review. | Proposals for Policy support were referred to the appropriate committee for research, study and review. | urgent or necessary Proposals were referred to the appropriate committee within a month upon receipt | urgent or necessary Proposals were referred to the appropriate committee within the week | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.00 | reminder: ang counting diri na activity is tong sa tanan na dili included sa LA ; no target | ||||||||||
30 | 1.b. Conduct of Committee Meetings and Hearings (Policy research, study, and review) | 100% of referred proposals/Drafts were conducted a research, study, and review thru Committee meetings or hearings within 30 days upon referral. | SB Committees | 10 | 8 | 100% of the referred proposals/ Drafts under the LA were subject of Committee Meetings and/or hearings for research, study and review. | 100% of the referred proposals/ Drafts under the LA were subject of Committee Meetings and/or hearings for research, study and review. | 100% of the referred measures under the LA were acted upon by the committee within 30 days. | 80% of the referred measures under the LA were acted upon by the committee within 30 days. | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4.00 | reminder: ang counting diri na activity is tong sa tanan napolicies na narefer regardless if na include or wala sa LA; target is the total referral regardless if na include or wal sa LA | ||||||||
32 | 1.c. Preparation of Committee Reports (Policy Reccomendation) | 100% of draft or proposals were recommended by the committee for enactment thru a Committee Report, signed and submitted for adoption. | SB Committees | 10 | 8 | 100% Drafts/ Proposals under the LA were recommended by the Committee for enactment thru a committee Report noting its findings and observation duly signed and submitted for adoption | 100% Drafts/ Proposals under the LA were recommended by the Committee for enactment thru a committee Report noting its findings and observation duly signed and submitted for adoption | 100% of the Committee Reports were prepared and submitted within a month after the committee process process. | 80% of the Committee Reports were prepared and submitted within a month after the committee process process. | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4.00 | target is number of referrals na recommend/or na consider for / during the CH/CM (pa submit report of conducted hearings and meetings) | ||||||||
34 | 1.d. Preparation of Committee Version of the Draft Ordinance or Proposal | 100% of the recommended draft or proposed policy under the LA were prepared in a committee version draft, signed and submitted for deliberation. | SB Committees | 10 | 8 | 100% of the reccomended proposals were prepared a committee version draft incorporating all of its amendments discussed and approved by the committee, duly signed and submitted for deliberation | 80% of the reccomended proposals were prepared a committee version draft incorporating all of its amendments discussed and approved by the committee, duly signed and submitted for deliberation | 100% of the reccomended proposals were prepared a committee version draft were submitted for deliberation within a week | 80% of the reccomended proposals were prepared a committee version draft were submitted for deliberation within a week | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4.00 | target is number of reports adopted | ||||||||
36 | 2. Formulation of Resolutions | 2.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
37 | 2.a. Referral of matters needing legislative action or authorization | 100% and above of matters needing legislative action or authorization were referred to the appropriate committee for study, scrutiny and review. | Presiding Officer | 50 | 44 | 100% and above of the matters needing legislative action were referred to the appropriate committee for study, scrutiny and review. | 88% of the matters needing legislative action were referred to the appropriate committee for study, scrutiny and review. | 100% of the matters needing legis action were referred to the appropriate committee within a month upon receipt | 88% of the matters needing legis action were referred to the appropriate committee within a week | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | |||||||||
38 | urgent matters needing legislative action or authorization were accomodated and acted upon immediately. | SB | - | 28 | Urgent matters needing legislative action were accomodated and acted upon immediately | Urgent matters needing legislative action were accomodated and acted upon immediately | Urgent matters needing legislative action were accomodated and acted upon immediately | Urgent matters needing legislative action were accomodated and acted upon immediately | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.00 | ||||||||||
39 | 2.b. Conduct of Committee Meetings and Hearings | 100% and above of referred matters were subject of the Committee Meetings and Hearings within 30 days upon referral | SB Committees | 44 | 38 | 100% of the referred matters were subject of Committee Meetings and/or hearings for study, scrutiny and review. | 53% of the referred matters were subject of Committee Meetings and/or hearings for study, scrutiny and review. | 100% of the referred matters were acted upon by the committee within 30 days | 53%of the referred matters were acted upon by the committee within 30 days | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | target is number of referred matters | ||||||||
40 | 2.c. Preparation of Committee Reports | 100% and above of reviewed/studied matters were prepared a report by the committee noting its finding and observations and recommendation, signed and submitted for adoption. | 44 | 38 | 100% and above of the reviewed, studied or scrutinized matters were reccomended for adoption thru a committee report. | 86% of the reviewed, studied or scrutinized matters were reccomended for adoption thru a committee report. | 100% and above of the committee reports were prepared and submitted a report within a month | 86% of the committee reports were prepared and submitted a report within a month | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | target is number of recommended during he CH/CM (pa submit report of conducted hearings and meetings) | |||||||||
41 | 2.d. Preparation of Draft Resolution | 100% and above of the recommended and adopted matters were prepared a draft resolution by the committee, signed and submitted for deliberation | 44 | 38 | 100% and above of the matters reccomended for deliberation were prepared a draf for deliberation | 86% of the matters reccomended for deliberation were prepared a draf for deliberation | 100% and above of the drafts were prepared and submitted within a month | 86% of the drafts were prepared and submitted within a month | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | target is number of adopted reports | |||||||||
42 | Policy Approval System | 4.04 | ||||||||||||||||||||
43 | 1. Enactment of Ordinances | 3.75 | ||||||||||||||||||||
44 | 1.a. Conduct of Public Hearing | 60% of finalized committee version draft were subjected to a Public hearing in consultation of sectors thay may be affected by the implementation of the ordinance, prior its enacment. | SB Committee/ SB Members | 4 | 0 | 100% regulatory policies were conducted a consultation among affected sectors thru a public hearing. | 0% regulatory policies were conducted a consultation among affected sectors thru a public hearing. | 100% of the public hearing were conducted prior enactment of the policy . | 0% of the public hearing were conducted prior enactment of the policy . | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.00 | 67% | target is number of enacted/reported policies needing PH | |||||||
45 | 1.b. Committee Reporting | 100% of committeed reports for draft/proposals were reported out and duly adopted. | SB Commitees | 10 | 8 | 100% of the submitted committee reports were reported out and duly adopted with complete documentation (endorsement, minutes, notice/invitation, attendance sheet) | 80% of the submitted committee reports were reported out and duly adopted with complete documentation (endorsement, minutes, notice/invitation, attendance sheet) | - | - | 4 | 4 | - | 4.00 | target is number of reccomended policies during the CH/CM (pa submit report of conducted hearings and meetings) | ||||||||
46 | 1.c. Floor Deliberation | 100% of committees' recommended draft/proposal were deliberated in the second reading | SB Members | 10 | 10 | 100% of the recommended policies were deliberated on the floor for the second reading | 125% of the recommended policies were deliberated on the floor for the second reading | - | - | 5 | 5 | - | 5.00 | target is number of CR adopted | ||||||||
47 | 1.d. Enactment | 100% of deliberated draft ordinances were enacted in the Third reading | 10 | 10 | 100% of the approved draft in the second reading were duly enacted in the third and final reading | 100% of the approved draft in the second reading were duly enacted in the third and final reading | - | - | 5 | 5 | - | 5.00 | target is number of 2nd reading | |||||||||
48 | 1. Adoption of Resolutions | 4.33 | ||||||||||||||||||||
49 | 1.a. Committee Reporting | 100% and above of committeed reports for matters needing legislative action were reported out and duly adopted. | SB Commitees | 38 | 38 | 100% and above of the submitted committee reports were reported out and adopted with complete documentation (endorsement, minutes, notice/invitation, attendance sheet) | 100% of the submitted committee reports were reported out and adopted with complete documentation (endorsement, minutes, notice/invitation, attendance sheet) | - | - | 5 | 3 | - | 4.00 | same targeting applies | ||||||||
50 | 1.b. Floor Deliberation | 100% and above of Committees' recommended matter were deliberated in the second reading | SB Members | 128 | 161 | 100% and above of the recommended matters were deliberated on the floor for the second reading | 244% of the recommended matters were deliberated on the floor for the second reading | - | - | 5 | 4 | - | 4.50 | |||||||||
51 | 1.c. Adoption | 100% and above of the deliberated Resolutions were passed | 161 | 161 | 100% and above deliberated matters in second reading were adopted | 100% deliberated matters in second reading were adopted | - | - | 5 | 4 | - | 4.50 | ||||||||||
52 | Advocacy | 2.40 | ||||||||||||||||||||
53 | 1. Promotion | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||
54 | 1.a. Promotion | 25% of the approved policies conducted IECs/information drive. | Sangguniang Bayan | 10 | 0 | 100% of the approved Policies have conducted IECs for public information | 0% of the approved Policies have conducted IECs for public information | 1 | 1 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||
55 | 2. Post Approval Actvities | 3.80 | ||||||||||||||||||||
56 | 2. a. attestation | 100% and above of enacted policies an adopted Resolutions were signed and attested. | Vice-Mayor and Secretary to the Sanggunian | 171 | 171 | 100% above of the enacted policies and adopted resolutions were duly attested. | 100% of the enacted policies and adopted resolutions were duly attested. | 100% and above of the approved ordinances and rsolutions were attested within a week after its enactment | 100% of the approved ordinances and resolutions were attested within a week after its enactment | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.00 | number of adopted/enacted reso or ord | ||||||||
57 | 2.b. Sealing | 100% of approved policies sealed. | 171 | 164 | 100% of the approved policies and resolutions were properly sealed | 96% of the approved policies and resolutions were properly sealed | 100% and above of the approved ordinances and resolutions sealed after approval of the LCE | 96% of the approved ordinances and resolutions sealed after approval of the LCE | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4.00 | number of adopted/enacted reso or ord | |||||||||
58 | 2.c. posting/ publication | 100% of approved policies posted. | Secretary to the Sanggunian | 10 | 7 | 100% of the approved ordinances were posted in conspicuos places in the municipality with proper notice and/or published in a news paper with proper documents and a copy of the published issue. | 70% of the approved ordinances were posted in conspicuos places in the municipality with proper notice and/or published in a news paper with proper documents and a copy of the published issue. | 100% of the approved ordinances were posted/ published within 30 days after approval of the LCE | 70% of the approved ordinances were posted/ published within 30 days after approval of the LCE | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | number of enacted Ords | ||||||||
59 | 2.d. Submission for SP Review | 100% of approved policies were submitted for review of higher authority in compliance to the provision of R.A. 71.60. | 10 | 7 | 100% of the approved ordinances were transmitted for review of SP within 3 days after approval of the LCE | 70% of the approved ordinances were transmitted for review of SP within 3 days after approval of the LCE | 3 | - | 3 | 3.00 | number of enacted Ords | |||||||||||
60 | 2.e. Dissemination | 100% of approved policies transmitted and disseminated. | 171 | 164 | 100% of the approved ordinances and resolutions transmitted to concern offices, agencies and individuals for information and/or approriate action within 30 days after approval | 96% of the approved ordinances and resolutions transmitted to concern offices, agencies and individuals for information and/or approriate action within 30 days after approval | 4 | - | 4 | 4.00 | number of adopted/enacted reso or ord | |||||||||||
61 | Technical Assistance | 4.75 | ||||||||||||||||||||
62 | Review of Barangay Legislations | |||||||||||||||||||||
63 | 1. Referral of Submitted Barangay Legislations | 100% and above of Barangay ordinances or resolution were referred to the committee for review. | SB Committees | 62 | 65 | 100% and above of the submitted Barangay Legislations were referred to appropriate committee | 105% the submitted Barangay Legislations were referred to appropriate committee | 100% Barangay Legislations were referred to the appropriate committee within a month upon receipt | 105% Barangay Legislations were referred to the appropriate committee within a month upon receipt | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.00 | target for second sem is 31 Supplemental Budgets | note: for 1st sem 2023- 31 Annual Budgets, 31 SK budget and 4 regulatory ordinances; for 2nd sem 31 supplementa budgets and 5 regulatory ordinances | |||||||
64 | 2. Review of Barangay ordinances/ resolutions | 100% and above of the referred Barangay ordinance or resolution were processed/reviewed by the committee. | 65 | 70 | 100% and above of the referred Barangay legislation were processed/ reviewed by the Committee thru a conduct of a Committee Meeting/ hearing | 108% of the referred Barangay legislation were processed/ reviewed by the Committee thru a conduct of a Committee Meeting/ hearing with 1-2 minor lapses | 100% and above of the referred barangay legislations were processed by the committee within 30 days after referral | 108% of the referred barangay legislations were processed by the committee within 30 days after referral | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.00 | target is number of referred barangay ords/reso | |||||||||
65 | 3. Reccomendation (Preparation of the Committee Report | 100% above of the processed/reviewed Barangay Ordinance or resolution were a committee report signed and submitted for adoption. | 70 | 70 | 100% and above of reviewed Barangay Legislation were recommended by the committee thru a report with complete documentation and attachments (endorsement, minutes, notice/ invitation, attendance sheet) | 100% of reviewed Barangay Legislation were recommended by the committee thru a report with complete documentation and attachments (endorsement, minutes, notice/ invitation, attendance sheet) | - | - | 5 | 5 | - | 5.00 | target is number of reccomended barangay ords during the CH/CM (pa submit report of conducted hearings and meetings) | |||||||||
66 | 4. Preparation of the Draft Resolution | 100% and above of the reccomended Barangay Ordinance or resolution were prepared a draft Resolution, signed and submitted for deliberation. | 70 | 62 | 100% and above of reviewed Barangay Legislation were reported out and duly adopted by the Sanggunian | 100% of reviewed Barangay Legislation were reported out and duly adopted by the Sanggunian with 1 minor lapse | - | - | 4 | 4 | - | 4.00 | target is number of adopted reports | |||||||||
67 | Quasi-Judicial Services | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
68 | Hearing of Administrative Complaints against elected barangay officials | |||||||||||||||||||||
69 | 1. receiving of a verified complaint | 100% of the verified complaint were received in accordance to ordinance no. Ordinance No. 2006-016. | Committee of the Whole sitting as Quasi-judicial body | 0 | 1 | 100% of verified complaint were received in accordance to Ordinance No. 2005-016 | 100% of verified complaint were received in accordance to Ordinance No. 2005-016 | 5 | 5 | - | 5.00 | |||||||||||
70 | 2. Referral to and creation of the investigating committee | 100% of the verified complaint were properly refered and endorsed to the created investigation committee. | Committee of the Whole sitting as Quasi-judicial body | - | - | 100% of the verified complaint were properly referred and endorsed to the investigating committee | 100% of the verified complaint were properly referred and endorsed to the investigating committee | 100% of the verified compliant were refer within 7 days upon receipt of the Verified Complaint | 100% of the verified compliant were refer within 7 days upon receipt of the Verified Complaint | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.00 | |||||||||
71 | 3. conduct of Administrative case hearings | 100% of the administrative case/s were conducted investigation process and hearings. | Committee of the Whole sitting as Quasi-judicial body | - | - | 100% of the referred verified complaint were conducted preliminaries and hearings upon determination of prima facie case | the referred verified complaint were conducted preliminaries and hearings upon determination of prima facie case | 100% of the conducted admin case hearings is in accordance to the reglamentary period set forth in ordinance No.2005-016 | 100%of the conducted admin case hearings is in accordance to the reglamentary period set forth in ordinance No.2005-016 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.00 | |||||||||
72 | 4. Decision Making / Resolution of the Case | 100% of the administrative cases were resolved or decided upon. | Committee of the Whole sitting as Quasi-judicial body | - | - | 100% of Admin cases were resolved or decided upon after thorough investigation | 100% of Admin cases were resolved or decided upon after thorough investigation | 100% of the Admin cases were decided or resolved within 90 days upon its filing | 100% of the Admin cases were decided or resolved within 90 days upon its filing | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.00 | |||||||||
73 | Administrative Services | 4.19 | ||||||||||||||||||||
74 | SB Secretariat | 4.30 | ||||||||||||||||||||
75 | 1. Documentation, | 4.20 | ||||||||||||||||||||
76 | 1.a. Recording | 100% of legislative proceedings were recorded | MISPerlas | 26 | 24 | 100% and above of legislative activity were properly/ accurately recorded, in an audio and/ or written/ stenographic notes | 92% and above of legislative activity were properly/ accurately recorded, in an audio and/ or written/ stenographic notes | - | - | 4 | 4 | - | 4.00 | |||||||||
77 | 1.b. Documentation | 100% of legislative proceedings were documented | TCCercado | 26 | 24 | 100% of legislative proceedings were documented as to attestation of Attendance, minutes and journals | 92% of legislative proceedings were documented as to attestation of Attendance, minutes and journals | - | - | 4 | 4 | - | 4.00 | |||||||||
78 | 1.c. transcription | 100% of recorded legislative proceedings were transcripted into a journal of proceedings | TCCercado | 26 | 22 | 100% of recorded legislative proceedings were transcripted into a journal | 85% of recorded legislative proceedings were accurately transcripted into a journal | 100% of the journal of proceeding were submitted every week or the succeding session | 85% of the journal of proceeding were submitted every week or the succeding session | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4.00 | |||||||||
79 | 1.d. minutes | 100% of recorded legislative proceedings/transcripted journal of proceedings were summarized into minutes and submitted for adoption in the succeeding session | MISPerlas | 26 | 22 | 100% of the recorded legislative proceedings were summarized into a minutes | 85% of the recorded legislative proceedings were summarized into a minutes | 100% of the minutes of proceedings were submitted every week or the succeding session | 85% of the minutes of proceedings were submitted every week or the succeding session for adoption | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4.00 | |||||||||
80 | 1.e. finalization of Enacted Ordinances and Adopted Resolutions | 100% and above of enacted ordinances and adopted resolutions were finalized, edited, and and prepared into a final copy for attestation | EJPLBrigole | 66 | 146 | 100% and above of enacted ordinances and adopted resolutions were finalized, encoded, and printed with acuracy | 221% and above of enacted ordinances and adopted resolutions were finalized, encoded, and printed with acuracy | 100% and above of enacted ordinances and adopted resolutions were finalized, encoded, and printed within the week | 221% and above of enacted ordinances and adopted resolutions were finalized, encoded, and printed within the week | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.00 | |||||||||
81 | 2. Database Management System | 4.25 | ||||||||||||||||||||
82 | 2.a. Data entry and generation of documents from LMIS/LTS | 100% of legislative data were properly entried to/generated from LMIS/LTS. | referrals, agenda | GOGNayre | 416 | 338 | 100% of identified data were properly entried to and/or generated from the LMIS/LTS | 81% of identified data were properly entried to and/or generated from the LMIS/LTS | - | - | 4 | 4 | - | 4.00 | tasked was performed by a CEW | |||||||
83 | 2.b. e-session management | 100% of session's agenda were properly uploaded one day before the scheduled session. | uploading of agenda and its attachments | JPFuerte | 26 | 24 | 100% of agenda and its pertinent documents were properly uploaded for the e-session | 92% of agenda and its pertinent documents were properly uploaded for the e-session | 100% of agenda uploaded one day before the scheduled session | 92% of agenda uploaded one day before the scheduled session | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4.00 | tasked was performed by a CEW | |||||||
84 | 2.c. scanning and labeling of session's agenda and pertinent documents | 100% of agenda and its pertinent documents were properly and accurately scanned and labelled for the particular session. | JPFuerte | 468 | 360 | 100%and above of session's agenda and pertinent attachments were properly scanned and labeled | 77%and above of session's agenda and pertinent attachments were properly scanned and labeled | 4 | 4 | - | 4.00 | tasked was performed by a CEW | ||||||||||
85 | 2.d. Reports and other Compliances | 100% of reports and other compliances prepared and submitted | EJPLBrigole | 6 | 8 | 100% of reports and other compliances accurately prepared and submitted | 133% of reports and other compliances accurately prepared and submitted | 100% of repordt and compliances were submitted on time | 133% of repordt and compliances were submitted on time | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.00 | |||||||||
86 | 3. Records and Archives | 5.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||
87 | 3.a. Manual Tracking System | 100% of matters needing legislative action were accurately recorded in the manual tracking form | Reso and Ord | EJPL-Brigole EMTanggan | 232 | 232 | 100% and above of matters needing legislative action accurately recorded in the manual tracking form | 100% and above of matters needing legislative action accurately recorded in the manual tracking form with 1 minor lapse | 100% and above of matters needing legislative action accurately recorded in the manual tracking form every week | 100% and above of matters needing legislative action accurately recorded in the manual tracking form every 2 weeks | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.00 | ||||||||
88 | 3.b. filing | 100% of legislative (session) documents were filed properly | CR, Reso, Ord, Minutes, Journal, Agenda, | EJPL-Brigole EMTanggan MISPerlas | 468 | 468 | 100% and above of session documents properly filed | 100% and above of session documents properly filed | - | - | 5 | 5 | - | 5.00 | ||||||||
89 | 3.c. archiving | 100% of legislative documents were properly kept and maintained | Reso, Ord., CRs, Agenda, | EJPL-Brigole EMTanggan | 468 | 468 | 100% and above of legislative documents properly kept and maintained | 100% and above of legislative documents properly kept and maintained | - | - | 5 | 5 | - | 5.00 | ||||||||
90 | 4. Other Administrative Support | 4.25 | ||||||||||||||||||||
91 | 4.a. receiving | 100% of matters needing legislative action were properly received; attachments and references were checked and scrutinized with respect to the request presented . | GOGNayre | 364 | 314 | 100% of matters were properly received; attachments and references were checked and scrutinized | 86% of matters were properly received; attachments and references were checked and scrutinized | 100% of matters received within 1-5 minutes | 86% of matters received within 2 minutes | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4.00 | tasked was performed by a CEW | ||||||||
92 | 4.b. Outgoing and logbooking | 100% of sb documents were properly logged and released or transmitted to identified concern office or individual. | GOGNayre | 776 | 1076 | 100% of sb documents were released or transmitted properly with receipt to identified concern office or individual | 139% of sb documents were released or transmitted properly with receipt to identified concern office or individual | 5 | 4 | - | 4.50 | tasked was performed by a CEW | ||||||||||
93 | 4.c. sealing | 100% of legislative documents and issuances were properly sealed. | reso, ord, certificates, others | GOGNayre | 116 | 177 | 100% of legislative documents and issuances were properly sealed | 153% of legislative documents and issuances were properly sealed | 5 | 5 | - | 5.00 | tasked was performed by a CEW | |||||||||
94 | 4.d. posting | 100% of notice of posting for approved ordinances were posted in conspicuous/designated places. | posting of copies of ords in places | EMTanggan | 80 | 50 | 100% of notice of posting for approved ordinances were posted in conspicuous/ designated places | 63% of notice of posting for approved ordinances were posted in conspicuous/ designated places | 3 | 3 | - | 3.00 | tasked was performed by a CEW | |||||||||
95 | 4.e. Preparation, encoding and printing | 100% of transmittals, endorsements, notices and communications were prepared, encoded and printed accurately. | notice of posting, transmittals, communications, endorsements | GOGNayre | 776 | 1076 | 100% of transmittals, endorsements, notices and communi-cations were prepared encoded and printed accurately | 139% of transmittals, endorsements, notices and communi-cations were prepared encoded and printed accurately | 5 | 4 | - | 4.50 | tasked was performed by a CEW | |||||||||
96 | 4.f. planning and preparation | 100% of admistrative and financial documents and activities were accurately planned, processed and facilitated. | spms, arta, compliances/ ppmp, designs, budget proposals, PRs | JPG-Casiple | 30 | 85 | 100% of administrative and financial documents and activities were were accurately planned, processed and facilitated | 283% of administrative and financial documents were were accurately planned, processed and facilitated | 5 | 4 | - | 4.50 | ||||||||||
97 | 5. Messengerial and utility services | 3.80 | ||||||||||||||||||||
98 | 5.a. maintenance of SB Offices and premises | SB Office and premises were maintained daily. | JTMaluya | - | - | maintain the cleanliness and sanitation of SB Offices and Premises | maintain the cleanliness and sanitation of SB Offices and Premises with 2-3 minor lapses | offices and surroundings maintained thrice daily | offices and surroundings maintained once a day | - | 3 | 4 | 3.50 | |||||||||
99 | 5.b. waste segregation and disposal | SB waste were properly segregated and disposed daily. | JTMaluya | - | - | office wastes segregated daily | office wastes segregated twice a week | - | - | 3 | 3.00 | |||||||||||
100 | 5.c. reservation and scheduling | 100% of usage of SB facilities are well reserved and prepared scheduled use | MISPerlas | 44 | 73 | 100% of activities were scheduled and reserved appropriately, equipments are well provided and monitored during the usage | 125% of activities were scheduled and reserved appropriately, equipments are well provided and monitored during the usage | 5 | 4 | - | 4.50 | |||||||||||
101 | 5.d. maintenance and equipment | SB equipments were properly kept and maintained | JPFuerte | - | - | maintain the operation of SB electronic equipments and appliances | maintain the operation of SB electronic equipments and appliances | - | 4 | - | 4.00 | task was performed by a CEW | ||||||||||
102 | 5.e. delivery of SB Documents | 100% of SB Documents were delivered to concern offices or individuals with receipt. | EMTanggan | 580 | 855 | 100% of SB Documents were delivered to concern offices with receipt | 147% of SB Documents were delivered to concern offices with receipt | - | - | 4 | 4 | - | 4.00 | |||||||||
103 | Vice-Mayor's Office | 3.75 | ||||||||||||||||||||