| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | AA | AB | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DA | Location | Description | Documents | Key points suggested to mention in a submission | Council Officer | DA lodged | Close date | Portal link | Statement of Environmental Effects link | Notes | link to make a submission | # lodged submissions | Determination date | Determination | PRA monitor status | PRA key person | ||||||||||||
2 | DA2026/2022 | 17 Gallipoli Avenue, Blackwall | 3 Unit Multi Dwelling housing and demolish existing | Trees being removed, Unit 1 POS will receive virtually no sunlight, UNIT 2's POS will not be much better. Ditto for living areas. | https://eservices.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/ePathway/Production/Web/GeneralEnquiry/EnquiryDetailView.aspx?Id=1381528 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | DA505/2022 | 11D The Sanctuary, Ettalong Beach | New residential dwelling, spa, pool and detached studio. Removal of 29 trees. | The height as documented on Sheet no 16 of the public notification plans is obviously greater than the 8.5m allowed for R2 zoning. The setback on the Eastern boundary of 1200mm is calculated on a height of just 5.7m, this is clearly wrong according to their own drawings.The sheer bulk and scale of this structure is completely out of character and will cause visual pollution.The destruction of 29 trees is an environmental disaster for the Peninsula. Surely in these days of environmental enlightenment a cleverer more sympathetic design could have been found which did not result in "moonscaping" the site. Fear of bushfires is a reason to build somewhere else not turn a bushland site into a desert! | https://eservices.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/ePathway/Production/Web/GeneralEnquiry/EnquiryDetailView.aspx?Id=1311684 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | DA49986/2016 | 237 - 245 Ocean View Road ETTALONG BEACH NSW 2257 | Mixed Use Development (consisting of 52 shop top residential apartments and six commercial premises), swimming pool and demolition of existing commercial premises | 22/07/2016 | https://plan.s.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/Pages/XC.Track/SearchApplication.aspx?id=011.2016.00049986.001 | Center Link | 19 | 16/2/2018 | Under construction | Peter Gillis | |||||||||||||||||||
5 | DA52563/2017 | 211 - 213 West Street, Umina Beach | shop top housing development comprising 2 shops and 20 residential units and car parking | The sheer bulk and scale of this structure is completely out of character and will cause visual pollution. | 19/07/2018 | https://plan.s.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/Pages/XC.Track/SearchApplication.aspx?id=011.2017.00052563.001 | 72 | 13/2/2019 | Under construction | ||||||||||||||||||||
6 | DA56801/2019 | 1 Waratah Avenue WOY WOY NSW 2256 | Residential Flat Development Consisting of 12 Units Including Demolition of Existing Dwellings | Antonia Stuart | 3/7/2019 | https://plan.s.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/Pages/XC.Track/SearchApplication.aspx?id=011.2019.00056801.001 | 3 Stories. High density (7.1 FSR) due to affordable housing allowance. Balconies push set back limits | 5 | 10/02/2020 | Approved under Delegation | Under construction | ||||||||||||||||||
7 | DA57779/2019 | 227-233 Ocean View Road ETTALONG BEACH NSW 2257 | Development Application - Commercial Development & Shop Top Housing (26 units) & Demolition of Existing Buildings | The destruction of 29 trees is an environmental disaster for the Peninsula. Surely in these days of environmental enlightenment a cleverer more sympathetic design could have been found which did not result in "moonscaping" the site. Fear of bushfires is a reason to build somewhere else not turn a bushland site into a desert! | Fred Dobbs | 13/08/2021 | https://plan.s.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/Pages/XC.Track/SearchApplication.aspx?id=011.2019.00057779.001 | Fred Dobbs is the planner - only works 2 days pw - Mon & Tuesdays. Robert Eyre, Principal Development Planner, is escalation. 4325 8216 7/2/20 - spoke to Robert - we he will get admin to check if there is a problem on missing submissions and get them to get back to me, | https://search.s.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/forms/php/eforms.php?form=100&da=011.2019.00057779.001 | 88 | Pending LPP | ||||||||||||||||||
8 | DA61806/2021 | 75 Brick Wharf Road WOY WOY NSW 2256 | Residential Flat Building - 6 Units | 1. Height - this is over the current 11m limit. 2. Setbacks on more than one side do no meet current requirements. 3. Communal open space does not meet requirements and the local Austin Butler reserve is under threat of being sold - so may not exist as an option for the residents. 4. FSR of 0.65 is 9% over the agreed 0.6 5. Council are adopting a greener space strategy - especially since the the peninsula is 4o hotter on average due to the lack of green space. This DA provides almost no provision for increasing green space or tree shade. 6. whole structure needs to be smaller to fit in to current local planning limits. | Erin Murphy | 13/08/2021 | https://plan.s.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/Pages/XC.Track/SearchApplication.aspx?id=011.2021.00061806.001 | Due at LPP early 2022 | https://search.s.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/forms/php/eforms.php?form=100&da=011.2021.00061806.001 | Pending LPP 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||
9 | DA59732/2020 | 302-306 Ocean View Road, Cnr Ferry road | Demolition of existing and Construction of mixed Use Development including Ground Floor Retail, Shop Top Housing and Serviced Apartments | 12 apartments. Rooftop pool No underground parking, as required for new developments Over height and this does not include stairs, planter boxes and any pool shading structures - this is approximately 13.5% over height limits. Large bulky development merging 3 lots, out of character with the precinct Substantially over the maximum Floor Space Ratio, 10.13% over. Massive reduction in commercial space, with only about 37% remaining. 23 parking spaces will enter/exit onto Ferry road, which is already extremely busy Traffic analysis was only 4 hours Ettalong is the 2nd most densely populated suburb in the Central coast, we do not need more high density living Ettalong is the hottest suburb on the central coast ---- update 11/Feb - retail area is now ~135m, now 22 parking places, no substantial change in plans. Some extra plans in elevation | Ailsa Prendergast | 13/08/2021 | https://plan.s.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/Pages/XC.Track/SearchApplication.aspx?id=011.2020.00059732.001 | https://search.s.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/forms/php/eforms.php?form=100&da=011.2020.00059732.001 | LPP 28th October | Approved at LEC - 29/11/2022. The LEC decision can be seen here - https://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au/decision/184a7fb7c31ce68ac064c316 | Approved | ||||||||||||||||||
10 | DA59732/2020 - Feb 2022 | 302-306 Ocean View Road, Cnr Ferry road | Demolition of existing and Construction of mixed Use Development including Ground Floor Retail, Shop Top Housing and Serviced Apartments | 12 apartments. Rooftop pool No underground parking, as required for new developments Over height and this does not include stairs, planter boxes and any pool shading structures - this is approximately 13.5% over height limits. Large bulky development merging 3 lots, out of character with the precinct Substantially over the maximum Floor Space Ratio, 10.13% over. Massive reduction in commercial space, with only about 37% remaining. Submission is claiming under clause 4.6 that the non-compliances be allowed. This bulk is certainly not in the public interest and there are no special circumstances that would warrant exemption to the current planning limits. 22 parking spaces will enter/exit onto Ferry road, which is already extremely busy Traffic analysis was only 4 hours Ettalong is the 2nd most densely populated suburb in the Central coast, we do not need more high density living Ettalong is the hottest suburb on the central coast ---- update 11/Feb - retail area is now ~135m, now 22 parking places, no substantial change in plans. Some extra plans in elevation | Ailsa Prendergast | 13/08/2021 | https://datracker.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/webgrid/?s=WebGridPublishingDA&container=DA%2f59732* | https://datracker.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/webgrid?s=WebGridPublishingDA&container=DA%2f59732*&ga=download&gdu=26914470 | https://search.s.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/forms/php/eforms.php?form=100&da=011.2020.00059732.001 | LPP 28th October | Pending LPP | ||||||||||||||||||
11 | DA42454/2012 | 1 Marloo Road, Koolewong. | https://plan.s.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/Pages/XC.Track/SearchApplication.aspx?id=011.2012.00042454.001 | ACE Building Approvals are the certifier for the site and can be contacted on 0402 343 678. The certifier is responsible for ensuring the building is completed in accordance with the approved consent. It is also noted on council files that the site was investigated back in 2016. Engineers reports were prepared and the site footings and slab were found to be compliant with relevant standards. Please let me know if you require further information in this matter. Yours Faithfully Mark Jennett | Development Control Officer | 31/08/2021 | For Info | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | DA42454/2012.2 | 1 Marloo Road, Koolewong. | https://plan.s.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/Pages/XC.Track/SearchApplication.aspx?id=011.2012.00042454.002 | Amendments | For Info | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | DA63084/2021 | 42 Bogan Road BOOKER BAY NSW 2257 | Development Application - Multi Dwelling Housing 3 Units & Demolition of Existing Structures | 1) Shadowing is a massive problem with this development. 3.3.3.5-Solar Access - incorrectly states this is compliant. Evident from ", the neighbouring properties would be overshadowed during the winter months " 2) 3) | Erin Murphy | 25/10/2021 | https://plan.s.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/Pages/XC.Track/SearchApplication.aspx?id=011.2021.00063084.001 | https://plan.s.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/Common/Integration/FileDownload.ashx?id=26727966&ext=PDF&filesize=561273 | https://search.s.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/forms/php/eforms.php?form=100&da=011.2021.00063084.001 | Open for comment | Frank Swiffen | ||||||||||||||||||
14 | DA60728/2021 | 42 South Street | -5 units -Re Underground carpark: The geotechnical report states, Provision should be made to pump out any seepage water in case of unexpected rise in groundwater pressures. -For this to happen, a pump will need to be working and will emit noise to neighbouring properties. There could also be an impact on near neighbours with engineering works. Think Opal Towers. -This DA sets a dangerous precedent. Never done before. -Impact on groundwater. -Overshadowing of southern neighbour getting less that the 3 hours of sunlight - non compliant. -Consultant Clarke & Dowdle report states that South Street accommodates low traffic demands adjacent to the site. This must be disputed. -Bunnings creates traffic build up. Adding the movement of 10 cars has an impact. -Gosford DCP Development Standard 3.3.3.4.2- Articulation -Requires Max width and depth of building 25m -For this DA 40.38m is proposed = Non compliant by 15.38 -This is greater than the previous submission. This demonstrates a total disregard for our DCP. -3 units would allow for parking on site and would be in character with the rest of the street. | Karen Hanratty | 29/10/2021 | https://plan.s.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/Pages/XC.Track/SearchApplication.aspx?id=011.2021.00060728.001 | https://plan.s.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/Common/Integration/FileDownload.ashx?id=26754564&ext=PDF&filesize=2305549 | 29/9/21 - 22+ Submissions the first time. Now developer has come back with updated SEE and plans Open for comments 8/Oct to 29/oct | https://search.s.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/forms/php/eforms.php?form=100&da=011.2021.00060728.001 | 33 - first round | Open for comment 18/Aug - On agenda for LPP on 24thAugust. | Debbie Sunartha | |||||||||||||||||
15 | PP-2021-5713 | 18 Macleay Avenue, Woy Woy | Planning Proposal to rezone part of land R1 General Residential for 18 Macleay Avenue | https://www.planningportal.nsw.gov.au/ppr/under-assessment/planning-proposal-rezone-part-land-r1-general-residential-18-macleay-avenue-woy-woy | n/a | CCC submission to DPIE to re-zone Was also reported in the PenNews - http://peninsula.news/2021/0615/ | Monitoring | ||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | DA62934 | 34 Warrah Street ETTALONG BEACH NSW 2257 | Demolition Residential, Residential Flat Building (New) | - Gun barrel development, inefficient use of land. - Articulation – this is 39.5m, well over the 25m allowed under the DCP - Site is 730.45msq, which is under the required size for this type of DA 750msq - 516 msq will be covered soil - which is 70.7% of the site - this is well under the 326msq DCP requirement to allow 6 meter front and back and 2m along side - The setbacks do not comply on 3 sides of the plot - some by a considerable amount. - Ettalong is the 2nd most densely populated suburb on the central coast - There are other large approved developments in Ettalong of over 134 units, and building in progress of over 50 of these, which will have a massive impact on the local village, infrastructure and services | Susana Machuca | 11/10/2021 | https://plan.s.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/Pages/XC.Track/SearchApplication.aspx?id=011.2021.00062934.001 | https://plan.s.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/Common/Integration/FileDownload.ashx?id=26707054&ext=PDF&filesize=1037346 | https://search.s.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/forms/php/eforms.php?form=100&da=011.2021.00062934.001 | 15 | Closed for comment | Frank Wiffen | |||||||||||||||||
17 | DA62725 | Booker bay | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | DA63260/2021 | 16 Sydney Avenue, Umina Beach | Dual Occupancy Attached & Demolition of Existing Structures | - building envelope limit is breached by a significant amount. - rear setback is only 1m - at only 33% of the required 3m. Would put extra parking pressure on the rear lane. - Continuous wall of 17.6m that is over 200% of the allowed 8m - - no space for trees or green space, in an area that experiences large heat island effect. - not in the public interest to increase population in an already populated area - Private Open Space for each of the 2 proposed dwellings are below the prescriptive 75sqm (Unit 1 65sqm & Unit 2 70sqm) - Overshadowing significant, and totally overbearing as it is along the northern boundary of number 18 Sydney Avenue. - Number 18 Sydney Avenue have had an application to DA with Central Coast Council since BEFORE number 16 Sydney Avenue lodgement, yet Number 16 Sydney Avenue has gotten through to this stage before number 18 has been considered by council. - The plans show the overshadowing of number 18 in its current form, not in the proposed development of number 18 (a single storey family home). The overshadowing plan currently shows drastic overshadowing of the existing structure, yet alongside the proposed new development for number 18 it would be even more impactful. - Length of wall is a major issue, proposed 17.6m length stretching block from front to rear, more than twice the allowable length. - Waste Management, I am not a professional, but I cannot see in the plans how Unit 2 which will be accessed via Lesley Knock Lane will have access to Sydney Avenue for rubbish collection.... and therefore, begs me to ask the questions, are they considering a garbage truck coming down Lesley Knock Lane, which would be another significantly negative impact on our neighbourhood. - And finally, this development goes against everything stated in the Central Coast vision and character, future integrity of our seaside community at Umina Beach. | 26/11/2021 | https://plan.s.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/Pages/XC.Track/SearchApplication.aspx?id=011.2021.00063260.001 | https://plan.s.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/Common/Integration/FileDownload.ashx?id=26759483&ext=PDF&filesize=648563 | https://search.s.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/forms/php/eforms.php?form=100&da=011.2021.00063260.001 | 4 | Lucy Quinlan | |||||||||||||||||||
19 | https://datracker.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/webgrid?s=WebGridPublishingDA&container=DA%2f63260%2f2021*&ga=download&gdu=26759483 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20 | DA/63718/2021 | 66 Webb Road, Booker Bay | Multi Dwelling Housing (3 units) & Demolition of Existing Dwelling | - Non compliant minimum lot size is too small by over 7% and developer is trying to use clause 4.6 - this is not in the public interest to have more development and less green areas on the peninsula - one of the most densely populated suburbs on the central coast. - boundaries and setbacks are less than minimum requirements under 3.3.3.2-Setbacks - this is also not in the interest of neighbours and the neighbourhood - building exceeds the maximum length by over 13m - that’s 53% over the standard. - using previous non-compliant but allowed development is not an acceptable practice. Each development should be assessed in its own rights against the standards and policies. - Council has adopted a greening policy in 2021- this development does not support that policy - The open space is well below the minimum. - The heat island effect of the peninsula will only be increased by this development - make the area more difficult to live in. - Quote from the recently departed Director Cox is incomplete, mis-leading and it is not attributable to this development. | Erin Murphy | 23/11/21 | https://datracker.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/webgrid/?s=WebGridPublishingDA&container=DA%2f63718%2f2021* | https://datracker.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/webgrid?s=WebGridPublishingDA&container=DA%2f63718%2f2021*&ga=download&gdu=26834278 | https://eservices.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/ePathway/Production/Web/GeneralEnquiry/ApplicationResponse.aspx?TypeCode=OBJCT&ApplicationId=890518 | ||||||||||||||||||||
21 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22 | DA63926/2021 | 1 Corrong Close, umina beach | Dwelling Alterations & Additions & Detached Garage, Removal of Trees | https://datracker.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/webgrid/?s=WebGridPublishingDA&container=DA%2f63926* | https://eservices.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/ePathway/Production/Web/GeneralEnquiry/EnquiryDetailView.aspx?Id=891761 | https://datracker.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/webgrid?s=WebGridPublishingDA&container=DA%2f63926%2f2021*&ga=download&gdu=26859231 | https://eservices.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/ePathway/Production/Web/GeneralEnquiry/ApplicationResponse.aspx?TypeCode=OBJCT&ApplicationId=891761 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
23 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24 | DA146/2022 | 275 Ocean view road, Ettalong | 5 Storey Mixed Use Building 23 apartments 35 underground parking | https://datracker.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/webgrid/?s=WebGridPublishingDA&container=DA%2f146%2f2022 | Traffic analysis was only for 4 hours in total and does not take into account the large number of other approve and in-construction buildings. Off Street parking will be impacted by the increase, in spite of the 35 places provided. | https://datracker.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/webgrid?s=WebGridPublishingDA&container=DA%2f146%2f2022*&ga=download&gdu=26912852 | https://eservices.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/ePathway/Production/Web/GeneralEnquiry/EnquirySummaryView.aspx | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25 | DA/2017/2020 | 117 The Esplanade, Ettalong. | 4 Unit Multi Dwelling Housing, Swimming Pool & Demolition of Existing | https://datracker.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/webgrid/?s=WebGridPublishingDA&container=DA%2f2017%2f2021* | https://datracker.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/webgrid?s=WebGridPublishingDA&container=DA%2f2017%2f2021*&ga=download&gdu=26885604 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
26 | DA/61493/2021 | 95 Paton Street, Woy Woy | Multi Unit Housing & Retention of Existing Dwelling (3 Units) | https://datracker.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/webgrid/?s=WebGridPublishingDA&container=DA%2f61493* | - Good sense to keep existing house - Has made some changes after feedback | Erin Murphy | 8/4/21 | https://eservices.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/ePathway/Production/Web/GeneralEnquiry/EnquiryDetailView.aspx?Id=1018595 | https://datracker.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/webgrid?s=WebGridPublishingDA&container=DA%2f61493%2f2021*&ga=download&gdu=26454887 | https://eservices.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/ePathway/Production/Web/GeneralEnquiry/ApplicationResponse.aspx?TypeCode=OBJCT&ApplicationId=1018595 | |||||||||||||||||||
27 | DA/287/2022 | 32 Kourung Street, ETTALONG BEACH NSW 2257 | Dwelling, Demolition | https://datracker.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/webgrid/?s=WebGridPublishingDA&container=DA%2f287%2f2022* | DA intends to remove a mature street tree - support low rise building | Robert Williams | 22/2/22 | ?? | https://eservices.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/ePathway/Production/Web/GeneralEnquiry/EnquiryDetailView.aspx?Id=1296633 | https://datracker.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/webgrid?s=WebGridPublishingDA&container=DA%2f287%2f2022*&ga=download&gdu=26927309 | https://eservices.centralcoast.nsw.gov.au/ePathway/Production/Web/GeneralEnquiry/ApplicationResponse.aspx?TypeCode=OBJCT&ApplicationId=1296633 | ||||||||||||||||||
28 | DA/1927/2022 | 24 Waratah St Woy Woy | Street tree to b e removed | Brian McCourt | 26/08/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
29 | DA/2686/2022 | 113 Springwood Street, Ettalong beach | Multi-dwelling housing (4 low rise townhouses) | Generally seems to want to keep trees, especially the street trees, which is good. 3 trees subject to removal Many trees marked as “Retain and protect” - subject to root assessment. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
30 | DA/2115/2022 | 83 Booker Bay road, Booker bay | Current street tree will be removed to make way for the 2nd driveway. This is a significant and mature tree and based on a Melbourne valuation is worth $20,000. If this has to be removed, can we mandate that 2 replacement trees are planted as part of conditions. | Brad Deane | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
31 | DA/12696/2022 | 4 Gross Avenue, Umina Beach | Dual occupancy | This is a new DA under the new CCLEP/DCP The site completely maximises the block pushing most limits to the max. However it does remain compliant. In line with greener spaces strategy - we would encourage that street trees ‘MUST' be planted as part of conditions of consent. | Amy Magurren | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
32 | DA/661/2022 | 47 Patong drive | This zoning is currently a Deferred Matter - approving this will set a precedence for neighbouring blocks. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
33 | DA/1761/2022 | 451 Ocean Beach Road, Umina | local copy here https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1uexzfFhGIBQem1RFj7n6-_1GR0keJRRe?usp=sharing | Rear lane access will create extra traffic issues Read set back is only 1m - non compliant. The proposed FSR is 0.53:1 (6.2% exceedance). Considerable over shadowing for southern neighbour. No tree planting is mandated. Not in the public interest to cram such dense building into an already busy street. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
34 | DA2041/2022 | 121 Broken bay Rd, Ettalong beach | 2-storey multi-dwelling development consisting of 3 dwellings | copy of some files here | -Removal of street tree (Jacaranda) -Non compliant side set back on upper floor by 27% (2.2m instead of 3m) -Non compliant rear setback on ground floor by 57% (1.95 instead of 4.5m) -Appears proximity of buildings is too close for any maintenance access. -Private open space are minimal and below required 45m2 -Replacement of the street tree to be removed is not specific as to the number, variety and maturity. -see submission from Debbie | Karen Hanratty | 7/11/2022 | 08/12/2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||
35 | DA/3195/2022 | 64 Broken Bay Road, ETTALONG BEACH NSW 2257 | Demolition and erection of 2 storey building | copy of files here | James Sammut | 13/11/2022 | 09/12/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
36 | DA/3381/2022 | 41 Bogan Road, BOOKER BAY NSW 2257 | construction of three x two storey townhouses with ground level decks and courtyards, and inground pool. | copy of some files here | -exceeds FSR by 7.9% -tries to justify under clause 4.6 - this is not in the public interest -driveway will not have required 2m setback at boundary per 2.2.8.2.2 of DCP | Karen Hanratty | 31/10/2022 | 13/12/2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||
37 | DA/1743/2022 | 324 Ocean View Road, Ettalong Beach | 3-storey mixed-use building. | sample submission and copy of some files here | - proposal is 3 storey in an area zoned for 2 storey -Breaches height limit 9.35 (should be 8.5m) non compliant by 10% -FSR is also over - proposed 0.66 (should be 0.6) -Should be assessed under CCLEP(2022) and -CCDCP(2022) not the GLEP (2014) -Clause 4.6 - financial interests of the developer is not in the public interest and thus 4.6 should not apply. -Removal of the 5 trees should be avoided. Some of these are indeed part of the UCSW a threatened species, specially the Cheese Tree. Where is the arborist report and who is the qualified arborist. - previous non compliance should not be used as a president - building will cause excessive shadowing - road report does not take into account impact other local large DA's already approved by CCC. - road report does not provide survey data sample dates or details. - there is insufficient local infrastructure to cope with increase in traffic and parking needs for any retail outlets. - the proposed 1.48 front setback does not comply with the 6m requirement of clause 3.2.3.2.2 of the CCDCP - Ettalong does not need extra retail space, when the existing is struggling to remain occupied and viable. Comment: Looks like a Soviet era block of flats. 3 Storey with tiny undefined “commercial tenancy” at the bottom and plunge pool on the roof | Karen Hanratty | 18/11/2022 | 20/01/2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||
38 | DA2807/2022 | 36 Kourung St, Ettalong Beach | Multi Dwelling (3) | copy of some of files here | -There are no shadow diagrams showing the impact of neighbours -There is not enough information provided in the plans and the SEE (Statement of Environmental Effects) for neighbours to assess this development and ensure calculations, like FSR (Floor Space Ratio) are correct. The SEE is very basic. -The updated notification plans are only 1 page and difficult to find enough details. -There is no indication of any tree preservation -The POS (Private Open Space) for unit 1 seems to be located on the front setback contrary to CCDCP 2.2.7.3.e -The POS for unit 3 does not have the minimum of 45m2. -There seems to be no allocated visitor parking as required under 2.2.8.1.g -Generally trying to get 3 units onto this parcel of land does not seem possible within current guidelines and this DA should be rejected. | 13/01/2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
39 | DA3526/2022 | 34 Picnic Parade, Ettalong Beach | Multi Dwelling (3) | copy of some of files here | -Will overshadow the neighbour providing less than 50% solar access in their POS. -Parking is not enough, should provide 6, whereas only 5 are provided. Relying on street parking should not be enough mitigation. -POS for unit1 is on the front setback - this is not normally allowed. -Design of all the POS’s will be in shadow from the building to the north. | 13/01/2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
40 | DA3831/2022 | 27 King St, Umina Beach | Multi Dwelling (3) | sample submission and a copy of some of the file here | -Should have 6 space - No visitor parking included. Should not rely on off street parking, especially with similar DA's in the locality -Rear set back is only 1.3m and should be 4.5m. The rear ‘dunny lane’ lane is not suitable for extra traffic. -Crams in 2 garages 1.33m from rear boundary. -The removal of the street tree should be avoided and council should ensure that a replacement street tree is indeed planted. | 13/01/2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
41 | DA3931/2022 | 124-126 Broken Bay Road, Ettalong | Nine Units | A sample submission and a copy of some of the files here | Report in PN http://peninsula.news/2023/0109/default.aspx?item=124Broken - This site has been the subject of previous DA’s for 8 units (refused) DA/3857/2010 and then 7 units approved - Mostly under 8.5m apart from the lift over run and portion of a roof section - 8% (400m) over limit. A request to seek exemption under Clause 4.6 is included in the SEE Appendix A - Excavations for the basement carpark will be 300m below the water table and have been recommended in the geotech report that will require tanking of the basement. This may also cause impact to ground water and likely to impact stability of the neighbouring blocks. Water levels likely to change +/- 1.0m with tide. A basement subject to flooding will result in residents parking on the street. This area is not suitable for basement parking (Umina Woolworths and basement at Ora units, 211 West Street, are examples of recent build basements that flood regularly) - The neighbours will require a dilapidation report due to the excavations. - The one page plans are difficult to read to any level of accuracy. - Shadow diagrams do not seem to be displayed in the available DA documents for neighbours to be able to assess impact. - The traffic report does not take into account other recently approved DA’s which will also increase local traffic demands. - It is good to see the retention of 3 trees and the introduction of 37 new trees. | 06/02/2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
42 | DA3337/2022 | 16 Sydney Avenue, Umina Beach | Dual Occupancy Attached & Demolition of Existing Structures | A sample submission and a copy of some of the files here | > This is a re-submission of DA63260/2021 which was rejected by the LPP, however now based on newer CCLEP/DCP(2022) > Featured in Peninsula News - http://peninsula.news/2023/0123/default.aspx?item=16Sydney - Rear setback is not compliant at 1m - should be 4.5m - Wall length & articulation - some areas over 10m -in length - notably 17.6m - Plans don’t reflect change of sill heights for neighbouring properties. - SEE refers to “2.2.5(b) - see discussion below” but this is not present in the document - Shadowing impact is significant even during noon at mid winter. All the north windows of the neighbour will be in shadow impacting the outdoor and indoor area. - The shadowing of the building will also impact the solar panels on the neighbours. - RL for 18 is 5.85m - RL for this DA is 6.42m - which will add to the over-shadowing impact. - Difference in RL may cause issues with the fence height on neighbouring properties. - The examples given are not an equal comparison. - Set back exemptions are also not valid and not comparing valid structures. | 06/02/2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
43 | DA3322/2022 | 57 Breeze Street | Dual occupancy & subdivision | copy of some of the files here | 4 trees being removed - can we ensure replacements are put in. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
44 | DA4112/2022 | 15 Allfield Road, Woy Woy | 4 Town Houses | copy of some of the files here | As a local resident I wish to object to this DA4112/2022 – 15 Allfield Road, Woy Woy.
- POS for each unit is below the minimal 45m2. This will not be a comfortable building to live in and allows for minimal outdoor and solar access. - Rear setback is less than 50% compliant at its minimum of 2.13 instead of the 4.5m required. - There does not seem to be any shadow diagrams to enable to neighbours to assess the impact of this rather large building. - There is not enough off-street parking to comply that includes the visitor parking. The area is becoming very densely developed and parking for any new developments must be self-contained. Relying on street parking defeats the objective of this planning regulation. - It is not valid to compare previous allowances under older DCP. This DA should be considered against the current standards requested. - The FSR should be actually calculated, rather than inferred as being compliant. - Such large blocks being completely covered with building and impermeable driveways will not help water drainage and flooding issues which are well known in this area and currently under review by council. - There is clearly not enough space on this block to accommodate the density of building proposed. It is not in the public interest and should be rejected. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
45 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
46 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
47 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
48 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
49 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
50 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
51 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
52 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
53 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
54 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
55 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
56 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
58 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
59 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
60 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
61 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
62 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
63 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
64 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
65 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
66 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
67 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
68 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
69 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
70 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
71 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
72 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
73 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
74 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
75 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
76 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
77 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
78 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
79 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
80 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
81 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
82 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
83 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
85 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
86 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
87 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
88 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
89 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
90 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
91 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
92 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
93 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
94 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
95 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
96 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
97 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
98 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
99 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
100 |