Contextualising Knowledge—Errata

	A	B	C	D
1	The printed version of Contextualising Knowledge contained errors. The ones I am aware of, I list here. If there's a future edition, I'll correct them then; in the meantime, they are listed here. Please feel free to email me (ichikawa@gmail.com) if you see something you think is an unlisted error. Or you can create a new entry suggestion directly in this document.
2	page number	printed version	should be	comment
3	4	The sentence to which fn 5 is attached	made grammatical	I think this sentence is missing an "is relevant" or some such, but it's just a super ugly sentence anyway and I'm sorry
4	15	(is it true at nearest worlds in which she did?)	(is it true at the nearest worlds in which she did?)
5	28	its being outside the c3 and c4 represents	its being outside the c3 and c4 circles represents
6	33	...invariantism about "knows" is perfectly consistent...	...contextualism about "knows" is perfectly consistent...	(Both are true, but it's the latter that I was talking about at the time.)
7	66	CC: A[]-> C if and only if C[]->A	CC: A[]-> C if and only if ~C[]->~A	MAJOR ERROR!
8	67	A []-> and C []-> A will have the same truth value	A []-> and ~C []-> ~A will have the same truth value	MAJOR ERROR!
9	80	...whether the evidence was consistent with...	...whether the evidence ruled out...
10	104	Tonic	Tonic	The title of this case, "Tonic", should be italicized, similar to the cases on the previous page
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100