RPCB Mentions
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
View only
 
 
Still loading...
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
OutletLinkMentions of B. Nosek
Mentions of E. Iorns
2
Washington Post
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2017/01/18/researchers-struggle-to-replicate-5-influential-cancer-experiments-from-top-labs/?utm_term=.cba0384735c6
40
3
Vox
http://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2017/1/23/14324326/replication-science-is-hard
10
4
TheScientist
http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/48031/title/Replication-Complications/
10
5
NPR
http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2017/01/18/510304871/what-does-it-mean-when-cancer-findings-cant-be-reproduced
80
6
UVA Today
https://news.virginia.edu/content/can-cancer-research-findings-be-replicated-its-complicated
70
7
Science News
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/cancer-studies-get-mixed-grades-redo-tests
30
8
Wired
https://www.wired.com/2017/01/fighting-cancers-crisis-confidence-one-study-time/
52
Mistakes B. Nosek as the lead who brough on E. Iorns
9
Gizmodo
https://www.gizmodo.com.au/2017/01/five-major-cancer-studies-are-proving-difficult-to-reproduce/
12
Mistakes COS as the lead
10
Stat News
https://www.statnews.com/2017/01/18/replication-cancer-studies/
31
11
PBS
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/next/body/cancer-biology-reproducibility/
03
12
Science
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/01/rigorous-replication-effort-succeeds-just-two-five-cancer-papers
03
13
The Atlantic
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/01/what-proportion-of-cancer-studies-are-reliable/513485/
04
14
15
total mentions3315
16
17
18
19
20
https://twitter.com/BrianNosek/status/822089669022273536
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
Loading...
 
 
 
Sheet1