Possible issues for 1.1
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
$
%
123
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
|
 
Still loading...
ABCDEFG
1
IDVotesType/MemberMilestonePriOwnerSummary/Comments
2
3
Nominations are open for issues to be assigned to 1.1. To vote on an issue, put "yes" or "no" in the milestone column. If you vote "yes" please also put the suggested owner and priority within 1.1 in the respective columns. We already have over 30 issues slated for 1.1; please be conservative in your recommendations.
4
Issues with consensus have had a comment added to specify the consensus. Issues without consensus have had the title line set in bold so that they will stand out. There's a ridiculous amount of consensus; only a handful of issues need to be discussed.
5
6
14680DEFECT1.xP1stevenknightSUN C compiler
7
consensusCONSENSUS: yes, p3, Ludwig or Greg.
8
9
Bill
10
Brandon
11
David
12
Garyyesp3easy, why not (just apply patch, no testcase/doc)
13
Gregyesp3not StevenI'll take it if nobody else is volunteered. Maybe Ludwig?
14
Jim
15
Ken
16
Sohail
17
Stevenyesp3anyone
18
19
16730ENHANCEMENT1.xP1garyoCheckLib autoadd should prepend, not append
20
consensusCONSENSUS: yes, p3, Gary
21
22
Bill
23
Brandon
24
David
25
Garyyesp3garyosure.
26
Gregyesp3garyoAbout time for this.
27
Jim
28
Ken
29
Sohail
30
Stevenyesp3garyo
31
32
19100DEFECT1.xP1stevenknightRecursive flag ignored in dictionary based scanners
33
consensusCONSENSUS: no
34
35
Bill
36
Brandon
37
David
38
Garynoafter 1.1, plenty to do already
39
GregnoNext release.
40
Jim
41
Ken
42
Sohail
43
Stevenno
44
45
19160PATCH1.xP1cournapeCheckCC and CheckCXX, to check whether CC and CXX work
46
consensusMOOT, already done (is it closed?)
47
48
Bill
49
Brandon
50
David
51
Garyalready done.
52
Gregyesp3DavidGo for it.
53
Jim
54
Ken
55
Sohail
56
Stevendone
57
58
19450DEFECT1.xP1stevenknightscons should not cache implicit dependnecy found from a directory scanner
59
consensusDECISION: Ask Ludwig if he can take it for 1.1 p3, otherwise defer to 1.2
60
61
Bill
62
Brandon
63
David
64
Garyyes, ifp3... if we get a test case from submitter and Ludwig wants to do it. I think this may be the root cause of some of my weird build failures when I delete files from scanned dirs.
65
Gregmaybep4Ludwig?If Ludwig is willing to take it on, then we can try it in 1.1. This is similar to the dir.get_contents() thing he did, so he's got the background.
66
Jim
67
Ken
68
Sohail
69
Stevenyes, ifp3agree w/garyo
70
71
20050DEFECT1.xP1stevenknightscons enters infinite loop if python is in unusual place
72
consensusDECISION: yes, p1, Steven
73
74
Bill
75
Brandon
76
David
77
Garynoannoying if it happens but only ever happened to 1 person so far. Defer.
78
Gregno
79
Jim
80
Ken
81
Sohail
82
Stevenyesp1anyoneeasy to fix, get it off the plate
83
84
20440DEFECT1.xP1stevenknightUNC path in C/C++ include directive leads to abort
85
consensusDECISION: yes, p2, Benoit (along with 1420)
86
87
Bill
88
Brandon
89
David
90
Garymaybethis has to be easy. Someone's just looping on parent forever.
91
GregnoOnly if someone else can take it. @Gary: finding it will probably be easy, but I'm not so sure about fixing it.
92
Jim
93
Ken
94
Sohail
95
Stevenmaybereally like to get UNC paths cleaned up, but who?
96
97
20500DEFECT1.xP1belleySCons child processes are hanging immediately after forking
98
consensusCONSENSUS: no
99
100
Bill
Loading...
 
 
 
Sheet 1