ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAA
1
Details / sub-tasksAssigneeIn progress?TargetProgress
2
Data migration for existing metering storesmine the meters/resources collections and map to analogous data in gnocchi, discarding unused metadata (perhaps use proposed synchronization API?) ?Nokilo-3
3
mine the samples event_type metadata to reconsturct events+traits if not already stored, in order to emulate the resource state timeline formerly persisted in the resource_metadata
4
document guidance for running gnocchi in parallel with classic datastore, before completely switching overfabiogNo
5
6
Ceilometer alarming rebased on the gnocchi get measures APIrestrict alarm constraints to strongly typed resource attributessilehtYeskilo-3
7
redefine alarm periods to be wall-clock clampedidegtiarovNo
8
restrict alarm periods to the granularities exposed in the ArchivePolicy of the corresponding metric_elena_Yeskilo-3https://review.openstack.org/#/c/159837/
9
allow new aggregate functions to be used in alarms (stdev etc.)silehtI think sileht is working on that too.
10
create heat resources for this alarmssilehtYeskilo-3There are patches on Heat waiting to be merged
11
12
Ceilometer v3 API to address mismatches/ impedence with v2 statistics/samples APIno arbitrary periodization support (defined up front in the ArchivePolicy)?Nokilo-3
I don't think this is an item to do. It's just a documentation issue at worst.
13
periods clamped to wall-clock boundaries instead of being anchored on NOW
I don't think this is an item to do. It's just a documentation issue at worst.
14
no groupby support
I don't think this is an item to do. It's just a documentation issue at worst.
15
incomplete aggregate function support (no selectable cardinality aggregate)lemming-*
16
no arbitrary metadata constraints
I don't think this is an item to do. It's just a documentation issue at worst.
17
18
Ceilometer/gnocchi dispatcher improvementsallow ArchivePolicy used for individual metric types to be configurable (e.g. map cpu_util to "high", disk.write.bytes to "low")pradYeskilo-3https://review.openstack.org/#/c/156617/
19
allow gnocchi storage driver to be delpoyed in-process in the collectorlemming-*
20
21
Extend python-ceilometerclient to support v3 API and/or provide python-gnocchiclientallow transitional queries to span both classic and gnocchi datastores?jdYeskilo-3jd is writing patch in python-openstacksdk and some got merged
22
23
Performance profiling / storage footprint measurement to demosntrate benefits of gnocchipublish comparison of classic ceilometer versus gnocchi metric ingestion and query performance (for a subset of storage drivers, e.g. mongodb versus carbonara+swift & mongodb versus influx)sileht?NoRC1
24
publish comparison of storage footprint classic ceilometer (e.g. mongodb) versus gnocchi for a given cloud size
jd
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100