ABCDEFG
1
˜
2
Meeting Link (ZOOM): https://uniroma1.zoom.us/my/tectonic.erc
3
Meeting Time: Mondays, 16.30 CEST
4
Past seminars: https://www.youtube.com/@tectonic_erc_marone/playlists
5
To sign up for seminar announcements please complete this short form: https://forms.gle/e25VUS8hYjed21g88
6
7
This week. Current talk
8
9
The Monday Seminars on Earthquake Physics are organized by Chris Marone as part of his ERC project: TECTONIC. The Monday Seminars on Earthquake Physics are organized by Chris Marone as part of his ERC project: TECTONIC. The seminars began in 2020 as a collaboration between ERC-TECTONIC (Marone) and ERC-FEAR (PIs Massimo Cocco, Domenico Giardini, Stefan Wiemer & Florian Amann)
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
DatePresenterPresentation TitleLinks / Slides
25
2020
26
06-04-2020Lauro Chiaraluce
27
13-04-2020David Mencin2020 Italy ERC Seminar Strain 101
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ehoo5wsyfgis1qu/2020%20Italy%20ERC%20Seminar%20%20Strain%20101.key?dl=0
28
20-04-2020Srisharan ShreedharanThe physics of elastic precursors to laboratory earthquakes
https://psu.box.com/s/78jguys4wosbkiib5n0n022wgb3a4mkp
29
27-04-2020Chas Bolton
30
04-05-2020Samson Marty
31
11-05-2020Claudia Hulbert & Bertrand Rouet-Leduc
32
18-05-2020Adriano Gualandi
33
1 June 2020Greg McLaskey + Earthquake Nucleation, the source of AE energy in lab foreshocks, & expectations for precursory changes in physical properties
34
Wu & McLaskey 2019;
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pISUuznrc_kgSvhpWwUP_67TeIfi8_EI/view?usp=sharing
35
McLaskey, JGR 2019;
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TjvqeBEF1AgGBUZF0Qhyg76YiIpKdUUB/view?usp=sharing
36
Bolton et al., 2020, submitted
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FHg-hAdubE9zqT_70onhn8T9NcTXmvNg/view?usp=sharing
37
Marty et al., GRL 2019;
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UoNNFZN0mQT6oBhDfFaeCSn6v6etip4x/view?usp=sharing
38
8 JuneMarco Scuderi
39
15 JuneClaudio ChiarabbaSeismic velocity precursors and the preparatory phase of the 2009 L'Aquila and 2016 Norcia Earthquakes
40
22 JuneMassimo CoccoPast and present paradoxes in earthquake source mechanics
41
29 JuneIan McBreartyLocating Laboratory Earthquakes and Using ML Techniques to Track Their Spatio-temporal Evolution During the Lab Seismic Cycle
42
13 JulyRoberg GuyerEvent Rates and Frequency Magnitude statistics for lab earthquakes.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CeN844QFLXRVlZ0uDexUrQwK9EbIibcc/view?usp=sharing
43
20 JulyGiulio Poggiali and Lauro ChiaraluceSeismicity and Multidisciplinary Time Series Analysis from the Northern ApenninesSeismicity and Multidisciplinary Time Series Analysis from the Northern Apennines
44
27 JulyDavid KammerArrest of Contained Laboratory-Generated Earthquakes
45
46
14 SepChris JohnsonCharacterizing emergent and impulsive non-tectonic signals in seismic waveforms
47
21 SepYves GuglielmiFault Reactivation Experiments and Modeling Highlight Aseismic Fault Leakage in Caprock Analogue and the Risk of Induced Seismicity
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XsfZ9YtBpn1_rvBsCu1LLqnsa8XzOUgM/view?usp=sharing
48
28 SepPiero PoliObservation of complex foreshocks sequences in normal faults
49
5 OctNo talk
50
12 Oct.Léonard SeydouxClustering earthquake signals and background noises in continuous seismic data with unsupervised deep learning
Paper in Nature Comm:https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-17841-x
51
Slides from the talk: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Ab0hVYa356HGSjQsmnxUITMm6ENJcUZk/view?usp=sharing
52
19 Oct.Luca Dal ZilioExploring slow-slip events and their scaling in 3D simulations of fault slip
A paper of interest: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2020GL087477
53
26 Oct.Bill EllsworthPreslip or Cascade -- 25 years onFrom foreshocks to mainshocks: mechanisms and implications for earthquake nucleation and rupture propagation
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1O8sLaNSABGGxhwDFGntMS_mF0j2FJef9/view?usp=sharing
54
2 Nov.Holiday, No Seminar
55
9 Nov.Fabio CorbiPredictability of lab-quakes: insights from analog models and Machine Learning analysis
56
16 Nov.Martijn van den EndeWhat's wiggling? Using fibre-optic cables as an alternative to nodal seismometer arrays
Paper in press: https://se.copernicus.org/preprints/se-2020-157
57
23 Nov.23 Nov.Inconsistencies and Lurking Pitfalls in the Magnitude–Frequency Distribution of High-Resolution Earthquake CatalogsSlides for the talk. See also their SRL paper in press and this paper by Marzocchi et al. How to be fooled searching for significant variations of the b-value; https://doi.org/10.1785/0220200337
58
30 Nov.Luca MalagniniSeismic attenuation monitoring of a critically stressed crust: a study of the San Andreas fault at Parkfield, and preliminary results from the Central ApenninesSeismic attenuation monitoring of a critically stressed San Andreas fault, GRL2020, 10.1029/2020GL089201Modulation of Seismic Attenuation at Parkfield, Before and After the 2004 M6 Earthquake
59
7 Dec.AGU, No Seminar
60
61
2021
62
11 Jan. Holiday, No Seminar
63
18 Jan.Georg DresenSeismic moment evolution during hydraulic stimulations in EGS projects - insights from lab and field tests
64
25 Jan.Qingkai KONGMachine learning powers the smartphone seismic network
65
1 Feb.Rachel AbercrombieUsing Small Earthquakes to Probe the Controls on Earthquake Source ProcessesAbercrombie, 2021, ..stress drop and energy release, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A
66
8 Feb.David MarsanRe-assessing the occurrence of foreshock sequences in California using the QTM dataset
67
15 FebJessica HawthorneWhich fault zone processes could cause slow earthquakes? Constraints from scaling, modulation, and location
68
22 FebStefan WiemerThe influence of a mainshock on the size-distribution of subsequent earthquakes: Implications for earthquake forecasting
69
1 MarJessica McBeckPredicting the timing of catastrophic system-scale failure using local strain fields and fracture networks
70
8 MarJosipa MajstorovicDesigning convolutional neural network pipelines for near-fault earthquake catalog extension using single-station waveforms
71
15 MarElisa TintiConstraining families of dynamic models with strong ground motion, geodesy and geology: Mw 6.5, 30 October 2016, Norcia earthquake, Italy
72
22 MarCamilla CattaniaHow do earthquakes begin? Numerical and theoretical insights into the nucleation process of small and large earthquakes
73
29 MarBertrand Rouet-LeducAutonomous Extraction of Millimeter-scale Deformation in InSAR Time Series Using Deep Learning
74
5 AprGreg BerozaDeep Learning for Earthquake Monitoring
75
12 AprWarner MarzocchiEarthquake forecasting, quo vadis? Notes on the current forecasting performances and obstacles, the physics behind the forecasting models, and future perspectives
76
19 Apr --SSA and EGU; no talk --
77
26 AprMostafa MousaviChallenges and progress in AI-based monitoring of earthquakes
78
3 MayFrancois PasselegueThe scale dependence in the dynamics of rupture: fracture energy vs slip dependent breakdown work
79
10 MayJoerg RennerHydro-mechanics of fractures: Modeling of results from field experiments in Reiche Zeche (STIMTEC)
80
17 MayFrantišek GallovičAnatomy of earthquake rupture by dynamic source inversion: A case
study of the 2020 Mw 6.8 Elazığ earthquake
81
24 MayMargarita SegouAdvances on Physics-based Earthquake Forecasts
82
31 MayNo talk; holiday
83
7 JuneThomas GöbelWhy do earthquakes occur far from injection wells in California and Oklahoma?
84
14 JuneSrisharan ShreedharanThe sound of friction: Active seismic monitoring of laboratory faults for earthquake precursors and prediction.
85
21 JuneMarie ViolayEffect of Pore Fluid Pressure on Earthquake Nucleation and Propagation
86
28 JuneZhongwen ZhanGeophysical sensing on submarine cables: a cocktail for two communities
87
5 JulyNo talk; holiday
88
12 JulyJoan GombergSleuthing slip on the seafloor
89
19 JulySummer Break, No Seminar
90
13 SepNo Seminar
91
20 SepNo Seminar
92
27 SepNo SeminarNo Seminar
93
4 OctNo Seminar
94
Meeting link (zoom): https://uniroma1.zoom.us/my/tectonic.erc
95
11 OctJean Paul (Pablo) AmpueroThe dynamics of very large earthquakes (elongated ruptures): continuum of speeds and rupture arrest
96
18 OctDaniel TrugmanWhat controls the frequency dependence of earthquake radiation patterns? Insights from a dense array50th talk
97
25 OctPaul SegallRepeating Caldera Collapse Events Constrain Fault Friction at the Kilometer Scale
98
1 NovNo Seminar; Holiday
99
8 NovKyungjae (KJ) ImA model for slow slip and tremor - friction velocity dependence and inertia
100
15 Nov Parisa ShokouhiDeep learning can accurately predict laboratory earthquakes from time-lapse active source ultrasonic data