SD2GB_mini_wheezy
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

View only
 
 
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRST
1
2
here we compare benchmarks for raspberry PI
3
4
using a berryboot installation of raspbian ( and already modified for camera use... )http://www.berryterminal.com/doku.php/berryboot
5
6
using a mini wheezy from darkbasic also upgraded with RPICAM on a 2GB SDhttp://www.linuxsystems.it/raspbian-wheezy-armhf-raspberry-pi-minimal-image/
7
8
running both without and with CPU tuning
9
10
config.txt#gpu_mem_512=256
11
#arm_freq=850
12
#core_freq=400
13
#sdram_freq=400
14
#gpu_freq=300
15
16
17
tests:./whetstonePiA6
18
./dhrystonePiA6
19
./liverloopsPiA6
20
21
22
data:see sheet speedtestdata ! PATH ! FILENAME !https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Aq8nIzK4W18zdHh2QlVHanQtVWNpSklyZE5wbTEzcUE&usp=drive_web#gid=3
23
results:looks like the mini wheezy not react on the tuning ( but rececked )
24
and also looks like the old raspbian tuned is much faster!
25
26
27
whetstone MWIPSdhrystone per seclivermore avg
28
raspbiannotuned227149532756.9
29
tuned332183908064.9
30
tuned_noCAM running328184331879.9
31
mini wheezynotuned276151658865.9
32
tuned274150943465.9why not faster??
33
34
35
36
37
forumhttp://www.raspberrypi.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=467742&sid=e7a296e0848460eff2505d115f940f73#p467742
38
39
40
41
bloghttp://kll.engineering-news.org/kllfusion01/articles.php?article_id=59
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
Loading...